CC BY
18
iE!
International Journal of Endocrinology
Орипнальж доcлiджeння
/Original Researches/
UDC 616.441-008.61-63+616.441-089.87:615.211+615.212.3 DOI: 10.22141/2224-0721.14.6.2018.146064
S.O. Tarasenko, S.O. Dubrov, O.O. Tovkay, P.O. Lishhynskyi, D.M. Kvitka, M.V. Kunatovskyi Ukrainian Research and Practical Centre of Endocrine Surgery, Transplantation of Endocrine Organs and Tissues of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Personalized approach to perioperative anaesthetic management of thyroidectomy in patients with thyrotoxicosis
For cite: Miznarodnij endokrinologicnij zurnal. 2018;14(6):555-560. doi: 10.22141/2224-0721.14.6.2018.146064
Abstract. Background. The multiplicity of target organ damages among the patients with thyrotoxicosis, indecisive benefits of inhalation anaesthesia (IA) or total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in thyroidectomy, advantages or disadvantages of using regional anaesthesia, the lack of data about the IA and TIVA effects on central haemo-dynamics in thyrotoxicosis patients during thyroid surgery require further research, improvement of anaesthetic management in the perioperative period, and the development of a patient-oriented approach. The purpose of the study was to improve the results of anaesthesia organisation in surgical treatment of thyrotoxicosis patients by choosing the anaesthesia method and optimizing perioperative anaesthesia. Materials and methods. At the first stage, the study concentrated on retrospective (2015) and prospective analysis (2016-2017) of 440 cases and anaesthetic maps of thyrotoxicosis patient who underwent thyroid surgery in 2015-2017 in order to identify the type of concomitant pathology and its incidence, the specific features of general anaesthesia depending on the type of anaesthesia (TIVA or IA) and its complications. The second stage included a prospective study involving 175 thyrotoxicosis patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Results. The evidence from this study suggests that the overwhelming majority of thyrotoxicosis patients undergoing thyroidectomy (67.7 %) are the persons with diffuse toxic goitre (DTG), 23.6 % — with multinodular goitre (MNG) and thyrotoxicosis syndrome; 5.0 % — with toxic thyroid adenoma; the rest were the patients with recurrent DGT or MNG and individuals with combined thyroid pathology (thyroid cancer due to DGT or toxic MNG). According to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) only 105 patients (23.9 %) of the total amount had a minimal anaesthetic risk — ASA I, the rest — ASA II-IV. The number of patients with ASA III was as follows: 33.7 % in the MNG group, 50.0 % in the MNG group with papillary cancer and 13.8 % in the group with DTG. Conclusions. The results of this study indicate that thyrotoxicosis deteriorates the physical status of the patient according to ASA. 76.1 % of 440 patients with thyrotoxicosis had ASA II-IV. 21.1 % of patients were at high risk — ASA III and IV. The study shows the negative impact of IA with sevoflurane and TIVA with propofol on the hemodynamics and oxygen delivery. Our investigations in this field seem likely to confirm the hypothesis that combined anaesthesia with bilateral superficial cervical plexus block performed as a pre-emptive analgesia using minimal flow inhalation anaesthesia with sevoflurane or TIVA with propofol provides statistically (p < 0.05) significant improvement in pain relief compared to monoanaesthesia.
Keywords: thyrotoxicosis; anaesthetic management; balanced analgesia; bilateral superficial cervical plexus block; inhalation anaesthesia; total intravenous anaesthesia
Introduction
Excessive amount of thyroid hormones in the blood leads to disturbances in various organs and systems as well as to the clinical manifestations of thyrotoxicosis. The main clinical symptoms of thyrotoxicosis are due to increased secretion of thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3), enhanced sensitivity to catecholamines. Excessive
synthesis of T4 and T3 causes an increase in body metabolism, caloric effect, and fat and protein catabolism, which leads to numerous clinical signs, as it predominantly affects the cardiovascular system (heart rhythm disorders, tachycardia, atrial fibrillation) [1, 2]. The heart rate increases to 90—150 bpm (even at rest and asleep). Thyro-toxicosis is accompanied by resistance arterioles dilation
© «Ммнародний ендокринолопчний журнал» / «Международный эндокринологический журнал» / «International Journal of Endocrinology» («Miznarodnij endokrinologicnij zurnal»), 2018 © Видавець Заславський О.Ю. / Издатель Заславский А.Ю. / Publisher Zaslavsky O.Yu., 2018
Для кореспонденци: Тарасенко Серий Олександрович, Укра'шський науково-практичний центр ендокринноТхiрургii, трансплантаци ендокринних оргашв i тканин МОЗ УкраТни, Кловський y3Bi3, 13а, м. Ки!'в, 01021, Украша; е-mail: [email protected]
For correspondence: S. Tarasenko, Ukrainian Research and Practical Centre of Endocrine Surgery, Transplantation of Endocrine Organs and Tissues of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Klovsky Descent, 13а, Kyiv, 01021, Ukraine; e-mail: [email protected]
OpMriHaAbHi AOCAÍA^eHHA /Original Researches/
and blood circulation decentralization. It has been proved by I. Klein and S. Danzi [3] that hyperthyroidism negatively affects cardiovascular haemodynamics and results in heart failure with high cardiac output, and, at late stages, in dilated cardiomyopathy. The work of P.M. Osuna et al. [4] shows that early and effective hyperthyroidism treatment can prevent congestive heart failure; the atrial fibrillation management and prevention of thrombo-embolic events are essential aspects of hyperthyroidism treatment. According to meta-analysis [5] total thyroid-ectomy has advantages over the antithyroid therapy for the long-term thyrotoxicosis management.
The multiplicity of target organ damages among the patients with thyrotoxicosis, indecisive benefits of inhalation anaesthesia (IA) or total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in thyroidectomy, advantages or disadvantages of regional anaesthesia, such as bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) [6—8], the lack of data about the IA and TIVA effects on central haemodynamics in thyrotoxicosis patients during thyroid surgery require further research, improvement of anaesthetic management in the perioperative period, and the development of a patient-oriented approach [9].
The purpose of the study: to improve the results of anaesthesia organisation in surgical treatment of thyro-toxicosis patients by choosing the anaesthesia method and optimizing perioperative anaesthesia. To achieve this aim, the following tasks were accomplished: analysis of the anaesthetic risks, the incidence of concomitant cardiac and non-cardiac pathology, the anaesthesia organisation peculiarities and the course of anaesthesia in patients with thyrotoxicosis who underwent thyroi-dectomy in a specialised endocrinology centre by analysing the patient's history and anaesthetic maps; analysis of the parameters of central haemodynamics in patients with thyrotoxicosis during thyroidectomy with the use of IA and TIVA; comparison of the combined BSCPB anaesthesia techniques with the use of minimal flow anaesthesia (MFA) (sevoflurane) or TIVA (propofol) and monoanaesthesia; evaluation of the pharmacoeconomic aspects of minimal flow anaesthesia/low flow anaesthesia (LFA) with sevoflurane or TIVA with propofol.
Materials and methods
The research has been carried out at the scientific department of Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Centre of Endocrine Surgery, Transplantation of Endocrine Organs and Tissues in two stages. At the first stage, the study concentrated on retrospective (2015) and prospective analysis (2016—2017) of 440 cases and anaesthetic maps of thyrotoxicosis patients who underwent thyroid surgery in 2015— 2017 in order to identify the type and incidence of concomitant pathology, the specific features of general anaesthesia depending on the type of anaesthesia (TIVA or IA) and its complications. The second stage included a prospective study for the period from January 2016 to September 2017 involving 175 thyrotoxicosis patients who underwent thy-roidectomy. 175 patients were randomized into 2 groups (adaptive randomization). 88 patients formed a group of balanced analgesia (BA), where a balanced (multimodal) analgesia (BMMA) was used with the mandatory imple-
_iEI
mentation of the BSCPB as a component of BA [10]. The control group consisted of 87 patients with thyrotoxicosis who underwent thyroidectomy with the traditional method of general anaesthesia. Depending on the type of anaesthesia, the group of balanced analgesia and control group were finally divided into the following subgroups: balanced analgesia-sevoflurane (BA-S) — 44 patients, balanced analgesia-propofol (BA-P) — 44, control-sevoflurane (C-S) — 46, control-propofol (C-P) — 41 individuals. Surgical interventions were performed under general anaesthesia with mechanical ventilation in the form of LFA or MFA with sevoflurane or using traditional method — TIVA with propofol. The anaesthetic depth control was performed by bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in the BA-S and BA-P subgroups, in the control subgroups — over the clinical course and the anaesthetic inhalation concentration at the end of the exhalation (C-S subgroup).
The perioperative stage was divided into the following parts: 1 — primary examination by an anaesthesiologist; 2 — the patient arrival at the operating room (the patient is on the operating table connected to the monitor); 3 — immediately after anaesthesia induction and tracheal intubation; 4 — surgery start; 5 — thyroid removal; 6 — after wound suturing (end of surgery); 7 — 24 hours after surgery.
At all stages the physical assessment was done according to the requirements of American Society of Anaes-thesiologists (ASA), the same as the haemodynamic parameters, namely: systolic (BPsys), diastolic (BPdia) and mean (MBP) blood pressure, pulse pressure (PP), heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, stroke volume and cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), oxygen delivery (DO2), etc. [11, 12]. The pain level was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) 3, 6, 12, 24 hours after surgery [13]. The analgesic consumption, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) syndrome were also evaluated [14]. The time from the end of the surgery to extubation and eye opening was evaluated. The pharma-coeconomic analysis was applied to compare the cost of general anaesthesia with sevoflurane in different fresh gas flows (FGF) and propofol dosed with BIS monitoring or the stepdown regime technique [15—18].
Results
The evidence from this study suggest that the overwhelming majority of thyrotoxicosis patients undergoing thyroidectomy (67.7 %) are persons with diffuse toxic goitre (DTG), 23.6 % — with multinodular goitre (MNG) and thyrotoxicosis syndrome; 5.0 % — with toxic thyroid adenoma; the rest were the patients with recurrent DGT or MNG and individuals with combined thyroid pathology (thyroid cancer due to DGT or toxic MNG). According to ASA only 105 patients (23.9 %) of the total amount had a minimal anaesthetic risk — ASA I, the rest — ASA II-IV. The number of patients with ASA III was as follows: 33.7 % in the MNG group, 50.0 % in the MNG group with papillary cancer and 13.8 % in the group with DTG. Among 440 procedures of general anaesthesia, 349 (79.3 %) were performed in the form of low or minimal flow anaesthesia with sevoflurane, 91 (20.7 %) — TIVA with propofol. It was analyzed that anesthesiologists performed systemic
ÏFJ
OpuriHOAbHi AOCAÎA^eHHA /Original Researches/
haemodynamic and cardiac rhythm correction by administering antihypertensive, antiarrhythmic, sympathomimetic drugs in 202 (45.9 %) cases, of which 160 (45.8 %) - IA with sevoflurane, 42 (46.2 %) - TIVA with propofol (p = 0.551, no statistically significant difference). Bradycardia occurred in 9.5 and 2.2 % of cases of IA and TIVA, respectively (p < 0.05). Additionally, it should be noted that arterial hypertension was detected in 18 (78.3 %) of 23 cases with IA, 9 (75.0 %) of 12 cases with TIVA (p > 0.05). Perioperative hypertension, which required medication, arose in 26.1 % and 25.3 % of cases with IA and TIVA, respectively (p > 0.05). 76.1 % of 440 patients with thyrotoxicosis had ASA II—IV class. 21.1 % of patients were at high risk — ASA III and IV. The most common concomitant disease in DTG was dismetabolic cardiomyopathy — 55.0 %, and patients with MNG and thyrotoxicosis had symptomatic hypertension or arterial hypertension — 64.3 %. The most frequent indicators were perioperative hypertension — 26.1 and 25.3 %, arterial hypertension — 6.6 and 13.2 % during IA and TIVA, respectively, bradycardia during IA with sevoflurane — 9.5 %, and hypersalivation during TIVA — 61.5 %.
The results indicate that both IA with sevoflurane and TIVA with propofol have an effect on hemodynamic parameters. The highest depression of haemodynamic parameters (BPsys, BPdia, MBP, PP, CO, CI, general peripheral vascular resistance (GPVR)) was noted at the stage 3 — after anaesthesia induction, tracheal intubation and the initiation of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol.
The evidence was found that IA and TIVA negatively affect DO2. Statistical discrepancies were obvious at stages 3-6. Thus, at stage 3, the highest values of DO2 were noted in the BA-P subgroup; at stages 4-6 — in the BA-S subgroup, which had statistical significance with other subgroups.
A significant difference (p < 0.01) was also observed between the BA-S and C-S subgroups, which is due to more aggressive induction of sevoflurane in the C-S subgroup. The study ensures that both LFA and MFA do not result in tissue hypoxia with the indicated FGF. There is a definite correlation between CO, CI and GPVR obtained while using Doppler echocardiography and estimated continuous cardiac output. It was found that in the subgroups of IA with sevoflurane, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.01) decrease in CO compared to TIVA at the stages of induction and beginning of the surgery. The use of the initial FGF = 2000 ml/min and MFA with FGF = 400 ml/min with basic IA in subgroup BA-S reduces DO2 to a lesser extent compared to FGF = 4000 ml/ min and LFA with FGF = 500-700 ml/min in the C-S subgroup. Dosed TIVA by BIS suppresses CO to 3-4 degrees and reduces DO2 to a lesser extent (Tables 1-4).
The intraoperative consumption of analgesics, in particular fentanyl, is significantly (p < 0.05) statistically lower when MFA/LFA with sevoflurane is administered than in combined anaesthesia using BSCPB. The comparison of monoanaesthesia and TIVA with propofol showed the same results. BMMA with BSCPB in addition to anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol reduces the need for
Table 1. Indicators of central hemodynamics and oxygen delivery in the BA-S subgroup
(M ± m)
Indicators Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7
CO, l/min 5.95 ± 0.17 6.00 ± 0.18 4.88 ± 0.16*, ** 5.20 ± 0.14*, ** 5.35 ± 0.13*, ** 5.42 ± 0.15* 5.35 ± 0.14*
CI, l/min • m2 3.23 ± 0.09 3.26 ± 0.10 2.75 ± 0.09*, ** 2.91 ± 0.07*, ** 3.00 ± 0.06*, ** 3.03 ± 0.07* 3.00 ± 0.07*
DO2, ml/min • m2 544.4 ± 12.2 549.5 ± 11.8 478.1 ± 13.1*, ** 505.8 ± 12.0*, ** 521.5 ± 10.5*, ** 498.9 ± 10.7*, ** 495.6 ± 13.9*
Notes (here and in Tables 2-4): * — statistically significant difference with stage 1, p < 0.05 according to the Wilcoxon criterion; ** — statistically significant difference with previous stage, p < 0.05 according to the Wilcoxon criterion.
Table 2. Indicators of central hemodynamics and oxygen delivery in the BA-P subgroup (M ± m)
Indicators Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7
CO, l/min 5.85 ± 0.17 5.91 ± 0.18 4.80 ± 0.16*, ** 5.15 ± 0.14*, ** 5.36 ± 0.13*, ** 5.45 ± 0.16* 5.51 ± 0.14*
CI, l/min • m2 3.20 ± 0.09 3.23 ± 0.10 2.62 ± 0.09*, ** 2.82 ± 0.07*, ** 2.93 ± 0.06*, ** 2.98 ± 0.07* 3.01 ± 0.07*
DO2, ml/min • m2 533.8 ± 10.1 537.6 ± 11.5 446.8 ± 8.4*, ** 480.6 ± 10.2*, ** 499.6 ± 9.2*, ** 489.4 ± 7.9*, ** 489.1 ± 9.6*
Table 3. Indicators of central hemodynamics and oxygen delivery in the C-S subgroup (M ± m)
Indicators Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7
CO, l/min 5.94 ± 0.17 6.02 ± 0.18 5.25 ± 0.16*, ** 5.14 ± 0.14* 5.45 ± 0.14* 5.47 ± 0.16* 5.38 ± 0.16*
CI, l/min • m2 3.19 ± 0.09 3.23 ± 0.10 2.82 ± 0.09*, ** 2.76 ± 0.07* 2.93 ± 0.06* 2.93 ± 0.07* 2.89 ± 0.07*
DO2, ml/min • m2 542.3 ± 17.1 549.1 ± 17.1 498.9 ± 14.1*, ** 483.8 ± 11.1*, ** 513.7 ± 10.4*, ** 481.2 ± 10.0*, ** 480.2 ± 9.9*
Table 4. Indicators of central hemodynamics and oxygen delivery in the C-P subgroup (M ± m)
Indicators Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7
CO, l/min 5.84 ± 0.17 5.86 ± 0.18 4.99 ± 0.16*, ** 5.11 ± 0.14* 5.34 ± 0.14* 5.38 ± 0.16* 5.25 ± 0.16*
CI, l/min • m2 3.18 ± 0.09 3.19 ± 0.10 2.72 ± 0.09*, ** 2.78 ± 0.07* 2.91 ± 0.06* 2.93 ± 0.07* 2.86 ± 0.07*
DO2, ml/min • m2 532.73 ± 16.8 534.4 ± 16.9 474.2 ± 14.2*, ** 484.6 ± 11.2*, ** 507.3 ± 11.7*, ** 483.5 ± 11.5*, ** 485.2 ± 12.1*
OpMNHOAbHi AOCAÎA^eHHA /Original Researches/
iEI
Table 5. Assessment of pain syndrome on a visual analogue scale in the first 24 hours after surgery, mm (M ± m)
Postoperative time BA-S (n = 44) BA-P (n = 44) C-S (n = 46) C-P (n = 41) р < 0.05
3 hours 18.7 ± 1.4* 25.0 ± 2.5* 44.9 ± 1.2* 47.5 ± 1.4* 1 vs 2 1 vs 3 2 vs 3 1 vs 4 2 vs 4
6 hours 22.8 ± 0.9*' ** 26.1 ± 1.4* 31.0 ± 0.9* ** 32.3 ± 0.9* ** 1 vs 2 1 vs 3 1 vs 4 2 vs 3 2 vs 4
12 hours 23.7 ± 0.9*' ** 25.0 ± 1.0* 27.8 ± 0.8* ** 28.6 ± 0.9* ** 1 vs 3 1 vs 4 2 vs 4
24 hours 19.8 ± 1.1** 20.7 ± 1.4** 21.3 ± 0.7** 20.8 ± 0.6** NS
Notes: * — statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference between subgroups according to the Wilcoxon criterion; ** — statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the subgroup compared with the previous measurement; NS (not significant) — there is no statistical difference between subgroups.
intraoperative opioid use, in particular fentanyl, compared to controls. The combination of dexketoprofen with cyclooxygenase-3 inhibitors (paracetamol or metamizole) in the BA-S and BA-P subgroups maintained long-term anaesthetic and analgesic effects of BSCPB and allowed the use of a significantly (p < 0.05) lower dose of dexketoprofen: according to the Wilcoxon criterion the use of dexketoprofen was significantly lower (p < 0.05) during the first 24 postoperative hours in the BA-S (124.6 ± 4.8 mg) and BA-P (122.4 ± 4.6 mg) subgroups compared to controls, where it was 146.8 ± 6.5 and 142.5 ± 5.8 mg in the C-S and C-P subgroups, respectively.
The BMMA using BSCPB, dexamethasone and dexketoprofen was more effective than traditional mul-ticomponent anaesthesia with narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics in control subgroups, regardless the basic anaesthesia type (inhalation or TIVA). The BA-S subgroup had the best postoperative anaesthesia level, a significantly (p < 0.05) lower pain score (VAS) in the first 6 hours compared with other subgroups; significant (p < 0.05) difference in Wilcoxon criterion regarding the pain level by VAS remained in the BA and control subgroups for 12 hours after surgery (the level of VAS was lower in the BA subgroups) (Table 5).
Discussion
Thus, the BA-S subgroup had the best level of postoperative anaesthesia with significantly (p < 0.05) lower pain (VAS) in the first 6 hours compared to other subgroups; significant (p < 0.05) difference in VAS score (Wilcoxon test) maintained between the BA and C-S and C-P subgroups for 12 hours after surgery (VAS score was lower in both BA subgroups). Better nociceptive monitoring with combined anaesthesia contributes to significantly lower intraoperative blood loss — 44.03 ± 3.71 ml compared to 69.57 ± 4.47 ml in monoanaesthesia. The best antiemetic scheme was proved to be the use of BA combined with basic anaesthesia with propofol in the BA-P subgroup with the addition of metoclopramide before anaesthesia induction. The highest number of patients who did not experience PONV was 77.3 %. BSCPB use leads to lower incidence of PONV. The lowest PONV values were no-
ted in the BA-P subgroup — the overall rate of PONV was 22.7 %, clinically significant PONV — only 9.1 %. The difference in the PONV frequency in the BA-P subgroup was statistically insignificant, but was clinically lower (by 4.6 %) than the overall PONV frequency in the BA-S subgroup (27.3 %). The lowest incidence of clinically significant PONV was 9.1 %, the lowest overall PONV score was 0.36 ± 0.11 (all indicators were significantly lower than in the control subgroups, C-S and C-P). The findings confirmed that both the time before extubation and the time before eye opening in the subgroups were statistically significant (p < 0.001) in TIVA compared to IA, both with BIS monitoring and without it. Indicators of both extuba-tion and eye opening time in subgroups were significantly (p < 0.001) statistically lower in TIVA compared to IA, with BIS monitoring and without it. It has been investigated that in BIS monitoring compared with the end-tidal anaesthetic concentration monitoring, the average time from wound suturing to extubation and time to eye opening after extubation were significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the BA-S subgroup (9.21 ± 0.73 min and 3.21 ± 0.12 min, respectively) compared to C-S (12.63 ± 0.62 min and 6.34 ± 0.15 min). In TIVA subgroups, while using BIS monitoring, the mean time from wound suturing to extubation was 8.63 ± 0.62 min and 11.41 ± 0.82 min in the BA-P and C-P subgroups, respectively (the difference was significant, p = 0.0083). The time of eye opening after extubation was 2.81 ± 0.14 min in the BA-P subgroup and 4.56 ± 0.13 min in the C-P subgroup (the difference was significant, p < 0.0001).
Individual approach to the inhaled and intravenous anaesthetic administration and correction under the control of BIS monitoring give an opportunity to personalize general anaesthesia.
The study also demonstrated a statistically significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the intraoperative analgesic consumption in MFA/LFA with sevoflurane (BA-S — 283.4 ± 12.4 |g/per operation and C-S — 376.9 ± 12.9 |g) compared to TIVA with propofol (BA-P — 353.4 ± 15.4 |g and C-P — 443.7 ± 19.0 |g, respectively). The values ofthe lowest (BA-S subgroup) and the highest (C-P subgroup) fentanyl consumption were significantly different in 3 other
i El_
subgroups. The anaesthetic costs were lowest in the BA-S subgroup, where the minimum FGF was 400 ml/min, and the initial FGF = 2000 ml/min, the cost of anaesthesia was 170.2 ± 4.2 UAH (Dion's equation), 183.3 ± 4.1 UAH (EMM calculation). The low-flow IA in the C-S subgroup (FGF = 500 ml/min) costed 186.2 ± 6.6 UAH (Dion's equation) and 203.8 ± 7.8 UAH (EMM calculation), and have significant economic advantages (p < 0.05) compared to TIVA with propofol. When using FGF = 700 ml/min, the expenses for IA (Dion's equation — 226.8 ± 8.6 UAH, EMM — 258.2 ± 7.8 UAH) and TIVA with propofol (231.4 ± 5.1 UAH and 238.8 ± 5.2 UAH, respectively, in the BA-P and C-P subgroups, p = 0.3808) did not show a statistically significant difference. In the C-S subgroup with the use of FGF = 700 ml/min (n = 21), the costs were 226.8 ± 8.6 UAH (Dion's equation), and 258.2 ± 7.8 UAH (EMM).
Conclusions
The study provides considerable evidence for the modern thyroid surgery. The findings confirm the improvement of surgical treatment in thyrotoxicosis patients by choosing the method of anaesthesia and optimizing the perioperative anaesthesia. The new reliable data obtained allowed solving the current problem of anaesthesia management in thyrotoxicosis patients. The evidence from this study points towards the idea of a personified approach to the general anaesthesia and perioperative anaesthesia choice using a combination ofbalanced analgesia and modern methods for anaesthesia control.
The results of this study indicate that thyrotoxicosis deteriorates the physical status of the patient according to ASA. 76.1 % of 440 patients with thyrotoxicosis had ASA II—IV class. 21.1 % of patients were at high risk — ASA III and IV.
The study highlights the negative impact of IA with sevoflurane and TIVA with propofol on the hemody-namics and oxygen delivery.
Our investigations in this field seem likely to confirm the hypothesis that combined anaesthesia with BSCPB performed as a pre-emptive analgesia using MFA with sevoflurane or TIVA with propofol provides statistically (p < 0.05) significant improvement in pain relief compared to monoanaesthesia.
The study also demonstrates that the intraoperative analgesic consumption is significantly lower in MFA/ LFA with sevoflurane compared to TIVA with propofol.
Conflicts of interests. Authors declare no conflicts of interests that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.
References
1. Pankiv VI. Practical thyroidology. Donetsk: PH Zaslavskiy; 2011. 224p. (in Ukrainian).
2. Cherenko MS. The current opinion on management and treatment of hyperthyroidism and other forms of thyrotoxicosis: review of the latest Guidelines of American Thyroid Association (2016). Clinical endocrinology and endocrine surgery. 2016;(56):87-93. doi: 10.24026/1818-
OpuriHOAbHi AOCA¡AweHHfl /Original Researches/
1384.4(56).2016.87324. (in Ukrainian).
3. Klein I, Danzi S. Thyroid disease and the heart. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2016 Feb;41(2):65-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cp-cardiol.2015.04.002.
4. Osuna PM, Udovcic M, Sharma MD. Hyperthyroidism and the Heart. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017 Apr-Jun;13(2):60-63. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-2-60.
5. Sundaresh V, Brito JP, Wang Z, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Therapies for Graves ' Hyperthyroidism: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Sep;98(9):3671-7. doi: 10.1210/ jc.2013-1954.
6. Kale S, Shipra A, Vineet S, Chintamani. Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Thyroid Surgery: A Comparison of Presurgical with Postsurgical Block. Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):1196-200. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1244-5.
7. Hall GM, Hunter JM, Cooper MS, eds. Core Topics in Endocrinology in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2010. 202 p.
8. Bajwa SJS, Sehgal V. Anesthesia and thyroid surgery: The never ending challenges. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013Mar;17(2):228-34. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.109671.
9. Purdon PL, Zhou DW, Akeju O, Brown EN. The electroencephalogram: a missing piece in personalized anesthesia care. Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep;123(3):725-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000794.
10. Larin OS, Cherenko SM, Tarasenko SO, Dubrov SO, Horobeyko MB, Kulish IO. Anaesthetic management of thyroidectomy in patients with thyrotoxicosis: the optimization of opioid-sparing effect and antiemetic component. Bil', zneboluvanna i intensivna terapia. 2016;(75):5-18. doi: 10.25284/2519-2078.2(75).2016.83981. (in Ukrainian).
11. Permpikul C, Leelayuthachai T. Non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output (escCO) during severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitation. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Mar;97 Suppl 3:S184-8.
12. Terada T, Oiwa A, Maemura Y, Robert S, Kessoku S, Ochiai R.. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modi-fiedpulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 0ct;30(5):621-7. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9772-x.
13. Boswell MV, Cole BE, eds. Weiner's pain management: a practical guide for clinicians. 7th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press: 2005; 1648 p.
14. Apfel CC, Laara E, KoivurantaM, Greim CA, Roew-er N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999 Sep;91(3):693-700. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022.
15. Lisnyy II, Zakalska KhA, Stryepetova OV. The economic components of different types of anesthesia. Hirurgia Ukraini. 2016;(1):103-108. (in Ukrainian).
16. Biro P. Calculation of volatile anaesthetics con-
Орипнальш дослiдження /Original Researches/
sumption from agent concentration and fresh gas flow. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Sep;58(8):968-72. doi: 10.1111/ aas.12374.
17. Dion P. The cost of anaesthetic vapours. Can J An-aesth. 1992 Jul;39(6):633. doi: 10.1007/BF03008331
18. Tarasenko SO, Dubrov SO, Kunatovskiy MV, Smo-
liar VA. The volatile anesthetic consumption: the evaluation methods and correlation between them Bil', zneboluvanna i intensivna terapia. 2017;(78):54-66. doi: 10.25284/2519-2078.1(78).2017.103518. (in Ukrainian).
Received 24.08.2018 ■
Тарасенко С.О., Дубров С.О., Товкай О.А., Лщинський П.О., Кв'тка Д.В., Кунатовський М.В.
Укранський науково-практичний центр ендокринноi xipyprii, трансплантацИ ендокринних opmHiB i тканин МОЗ Украни, м. Ки1в, Украна
Персоыфкований niAxiA до перюперацшного анестезюлопчного менеджменту тиреоТдектомш у паценлв i3 синдромом тиреотоксикозу
Резюме. Актуальтсть. Робота присвячена виршенню актуального завдання сучасно! тиреощно1 ирургГ! — по-лшшенню результата хгрурпчного лшування пащенпв iз синдромом тиреотоксикозу. Мета до^дження — розро-бити персошфжований пiдхiд до вибору методу загально! анестезГ! (ЗА) та перюперацшного знеболювання iз засто-суванням комплексу збалансовано! аналгезГ! та сучасних метсдав контролю за перебГгом анестезГ!. Матерiалu та методы. На першш стадГ! проведено ретроспективний Г проспективний аналГз (2016—2017) 440 випадшв Г карт пащенпв з тиреотоксикозом, якг перебували на стацюнар-ному лГкуванш з приводу тирео'!дектомГ! в 2015—2017 рр., для ГдентифГкацГ! супутньо'! патологи, визначення особли-востей загально'! анестезГ! залежно вГд виду анестезГ! та и ускладнень. Друга стадГя полягала в проспективному до-слГдженш за участю 175 пащенпв Гз тиреотоксикозом тс-ля тиреощектомГ!. Результаты. Синдром тиреотоксикозу погГршуе фГзичний статус пацГента за критерГями Аме-рикансько! асощацГ! анестезюлопв. Як шгаляцшна, так Г тотальна внутршньовенна анестезГя негативно впливають на показники гемодинамГки та доставку кисню. Встанов-лено, що поеднана анестезГя Гз бшатеральною блокадою поверхневого шийного сплетення на тлГ застосування
шгаляцшно1 низькопотоково! або тотально! внутршньо-венно! анестезГ! забезпечуе кращий рГвень знеболювання порГвняно з моноанестезГею. Найкращою антиеметичною схемою е використання ЗА на тлГ базово! анестезГ! про-пофолом Гз додаванням метоклопрамГду перед шдукщею анестезГ!. 1ндивГдуалГзацГя подання та корекцГя дози газового або внутршньовенного анестетишв пГд контролем ВК-мошторингу дають змогу досягнути персошфшацГ! загально! анестезГ!. НайбГльш економГчно доцГльним е ви-користання 1А севофлураном за мтмально-потоковим контуром (FGF = 400 мл/хв). Висновки. Розроблено алгоритм анестезГологГчного менеджменту в пацГентГв Гз синдромом тиреотоксикозу при тиреощектомГях Гз обГрунту-ванням використання ГнгаляцГйно! низькопотоково! або тотально! внутршньовенно1 анестезГ!. Отримаш новГ вГро-гщш даш дозволили розробити персошфшований пГдхГд до вибору методу загально! анестезГ! та перюперацшного знеболювання Гз застосуванням комплексу ЗА та сучасних методГв контролю за перебГгом анестезГ!. Ключовi слова: тиреотоксикоз; анестезюлопчний менеджмент; збалансована аналгезГя; бГлатеральна блокада поверхневого шийного сплетення; шгаляцшна анестезГя; тотальна внутршньовенна анестезГя
Тарасенко С.А., Дубров С.А., Товкай А.А., Лищинский П.А., Квитка Д.В., Кунатовский М.В.
Украинский научно-практический центр эндокринной хирургии, трансплантации эндокринных органов и тканей МЗ Украины, г. Киев, Украина
Персонифицированный подход к периоперационному анестезиологическому менеджменту тиреоидэктомий у пациентов с синдромом тиреотоксикоза
Резюме. Актуальность. Работа посвящена решению актуальной задачи современной тиреоидной хирургии — улучшению результатов хирургического лечения пациентов с синдромом тиреотоксикоза. Цель исследования — разработать персонифицированный подход к выбору метода общей анестезии (ОА) и периоперационного обезболивания с применением комплекса сбалансированной аналгезии и современных методов контроля за ходом анестезии. Материалы и методы. На первой стадии проведен ретроспективный и проспективный анализ (2016—2017) 440 случаев и карт пациентов с тиреотоксикозом, которые находились на стационарном лечении по поводу тиреоидэктомии в 2015— 2017 гг., для идентификации сопутствующей патологии, определения особенностей общей анестезии в зависимости от вида анестезии и ее осложнений. Вторая стадия заключалась в проспективном исследовании при участии 175 пациентов с тиреотоксикозом после тиреоидэктомии. Результаты. Синдром тиреотоксикоза ухудшает физический статус пациента согласно критериям Американской ассоциации анестезиологов. Как ингаляционная, так и тотальная внутривенная анестезия негативно влияет на показатели гемодинамики и доставку кислорода. Установлено, что комбинированная анестезия с билатеральной блокадой поверхностного шейного сплетения на фоне применения инга-
ляционной низкопотоковой или тотальной внутривенной анестезии обеспечивает лучший уровень обезболивания по сравнению с моноанестезией. Лучшей антиэметической схемой является использование ОА на фоне базовой анестезии пропофолом с добавлением метоклопрамида перед индукцией анестезии. Индивидуализация подачи и коррекция дозы газового или внутривенного анестетиков под контролем ВК-мониторинга позволяют достичь персонификации общей анестезии. Наиболее экономически целесообразным является использование ИА севофлураном по минимально-потоковому контуру (FGF = 400 мл/мин). Выводы. Разработан алгоритм анестезиологического менеджмента у пациентов с синдромом тиреотоксикоза при тиреоидэктомиях с обоснованием использования ингаляционной низкопотоковой или тотальной внутривенной анестезии. Полученные новые достоверные данные позволили разработать персонифицированный подход к выбору метода общей анестезии и периоперационного обезболивания с применением комплекса ИА и современных методов контроля за ходом анестезии.
Ключевые слова: тиреотоксикоз; анестезиологический менеджмент; сбалансированная аналгезия; билатеральная блокада поверхностного шейного сплетения; ингаляционная анестезия; тотальная внутривенная анестезия
