11Innovative Technologies in Teaching Foreign Languages and Learner Assessment in Online Education Chirchik State Pedagogical Institute of Tashkent region
INTERACTION OF ORAL AND WRITTEN FORMS OF SPEECH IN INTERNET COMMUNICATION IN ONLINE TEACHING
Dildor Abdullaevna Mukhamadieva
Astrakhan State Technical University in Tashkent region, English language teacher
ABSTRACT
This article discusses the interaction between oral and written English in online communication. At the same time, the application and importance of oral and nonverbal skills in a foreign language in modern information technologies was discussed.
Keywords: Internet, oral speech, writimg skill, grammar, punctuational, rules, communication.
INTRODUCTION
Of the 7 billion people on earth, there are an estimated 6 billion phones, more than 2 billion computers and nearly 2.5 billion Internet users. All this testifies to the constant need for communication, and the Internet makes it almost incessant.
Today, virtual communication is becoming more popular than real communication, and it is generally recognized that a special form of speech arises in the process of Internet communication. The purpose of the article is to comprehend the features of the interaction of oral and written forms of speech that have appeared along with the ability to exchange instant messages on the Internet. Specialists in various fields work at a high level with foreign partners, so they are in great demand for language learning.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Oral speech - speech in oral form, consisting of a complex ability to understand sound (listening) and the ability to produce speech in sound form (speaking). Oral speech is carried out with direct contact of the interlocutors, while the communication process is accompanied by the use of non-verbal means of communication, statements are made out using intonation. Oral speech is also characterized by such characteristics as, on the one hand, redundancy (the presence of repetitions, clarifications, explanations), on the other hand, the economy of speech means (with conversationalists may not name something, if it's easy to guess).
Written speech, in turn, is a form of speech associated with the expression and
perception of thoughts in graphic form. It is believed that written speech is the most
difficult as a form of communication. If oral speech is free and allows for repetitions Google Scholar Scientific Library of Uzbekistan
Academic Research, Uzbekistan 466 www.ares.uz
Innovative Technologies in Teaching Foreign Languages and Learner Assessment in Online Education Chirchik State Pedagogical Institute of Tashkent region
and omissions, then written speech presupposes skillful construction of sentences, literacy of writing, a complex structure, organization and logical connection. As you know, many changes in society are associated with the Internet: technological, psychological, and social. Changes have also occurred in the speech of users of the global network.
These changes have become especially noticeable in connection with the emergence of various programs that allow virtual communication in real time. Chat rooms, forums, and other online conversational formats involve text messaging, which means written speech is involved. However, the communicative context of online communication corresponds to the oral format: conducting a dialogue in real time, exchanging quick remarks, the need to save time and speech efforts, both of your own and of your interlocutor.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Thus, a new autonomous form of speech emerged, possessing features of both oral and written forms, as well as additional ones that exist only in the virtual space, such as the use of computer slang, pictograms denoting emotions, etc. Designation of the status of this new form of speech, as well as the study of its features is an urgent linguistic task. At the moment, there are several characteristic properties of Internet communication, indicating a tendency for the mutual influence of oral and written forms of speech.
Let's analyze this process, based on the materials of the social network "Vkontakte". We have collected about 70 texts of correspondence of users aged 16 to 20 years as the audience most receptive to new trends. We selected those messages that most clearly demonstrate the tendency to mix the forms of oral and written communication.
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
Researchers have noted the inherent disregard of the rules of spelling and punctuation inherent in modern Internet users, when speech is built on the principle of "how you hear it, so you write it", and the graphic form approaches the sound one: "Yes, I'll make as u", "in short, give the number", "And why are you sitting here rubbing your trousers and there is nothing positive about you?".
In our opinion, this testifies to the perception of correspondence as a real conversation: usually we imagine that we are talking, but we only have to "speak" through writing. To save time, online interlocutors do not correct mistakes and typos, being sure that they will remain understood.
Google Scholar Scientific Library of Uzbekistan
Academic Research, Uzbekistan 467 www.ares.uz
Innovative Technologies in Teaching Foreign Languages and Learner Assessment in Online Education Chirchik State Pedagogical Institute of Tashkent region
The syntactic features of Internet communication also indicate the process of mutual influence of oral and written forms of speech. So, researchers note the inherent ease of Internet communication, that is, the absence of participial and adverbial phrases in written speech, a passive voice, which, according to some experts, creates an atmosphere of presence, that is, brings correspondence closer to oral communication, in which the speaker avoids complex sentences and syntactic complications.
Probably for the same reason, Internet interlocutors ignore the rules of punctuation: often in Internet correspondence, there are no commas, periods, question marks and exclamation marks. The desire of Internet users to give written correspondence the status of a real dialogue, with the observance of pauses, demonstration of emotional reaction, speed and loudness of speech, determines the use of punctuation marks not for their intended purpose, but as parameters of the tempo and loudness of speech.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONS
The conducted review of the features of network communication allows us to conclude that we are witnesses and participants in the process of functioning of a separate network form of speech - "written colloquial", that is, written speech proceeding at the pace of oral in the conditions of Internet communication.
As examples show, the main linguistic means of correspondence are spoken and spoken elements, and their use is especially vividly realized in chats, groups, forums. The style of communication adopted by users on the Internet flows into common everyday vocabulary, significantly influencing the speech characteristics of a person, opening up the potential and unclaimed possibilities of the language, the study of which is a subject for further research.
REFERENCES
1. Johnson, K. E. The Sociocultural Turn and Its Challenges for Second Language Teacher Education. // TESOL Quarterly., - London., 2006: - 235- bet.
2. Harmer J. The Practice of English Language Teaching. - London., 2001: - 64-bet.
3. Jalolov J. Chet tili o'qitish metodikasi. - Toshkent., 2012: - 48-bet.
4. Yusupova, M. A. (2020). Successful way of being a skilled English teacher. Science and Education, 1 (Special Issue 2), 198-203.
5. Makhmatkulov, K., Gaziyeva, S., & Ashirova, M. (2020). LANGUAGE INTERFERENCE IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH. nternational Journal for Innovative
Google Scholar
Academic Research, Uzbekistan
Scientific Library of Uzbekistan www.ares.uz
Innovative Technologies in Teaching Foreign Languages and Learner Assessment in Online Education Chirchik State Pedagogical Institute of Tashkent region
Engineering and Management Research A Peer Reviewed Open Access International Journal, 09(09), 198-201.
6. Khakimova, K. B. (2020). THE SUBJECT AND PLACE OF TOPONYMICS IN THE SYSTEM OF SCIENCES. Science and Education, 1 (Special Issue 2).
7. Gazieva, S. T. (2020). MODERN TECHNOLOGY IN LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGES. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 1 (3), 1272-1275.
8. Khakimova, K. B. (2020). BASIC PRINCIPLES OF CONVERSATION OF TOPONYMS ON GEOGRAPHIC MAPS. Scienticif-methodical journal of SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS, (Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2021).
Google Scholar
Academic Research, Uzbekistan
Scientific Library of Uzbekistan www.ares.uz
