SYNTHESIS AND STUDY OF NEW N-SUBSTITUTED HYDRAZONES OF NI(II) COMPLEXES OF β-OCTAETHYLPORPHYRIN AND COPROPORPHYRIN I TETRAETHYL ESTER Текст научной статьи по специальности «Химические науки»

Porphyrins nop$upuHbi

Макрогэтэроцмклы

http://macroheterocycles.isuct.ru

Paper Статья

DOI: 10.6060/mhc171148z

Synthesis and Study of New N-Substituted Hydrazones of Ni(II) Complexes of ^-Octaethylporphyrin and Coproporphyrin I Tetraethyl Ester

Alena O. Shkirdova,ab Ilya A. Zamilatskov,a@ Nadezhda M. Stanetskaya,a Victor A. Tafeenko,c Vladimir S. Tyurin,a Vladimir V. Chernyshev,ac Gelii V. Ponomarev,d and Aslan Yu. Tsivadzea

aA.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russian Federation

b'Moscow Technological University, Institute of Fine Chemical Technologies, 119571 Moscow, Russian Federation cChemical Department, Moscow State University, 119899 Moscow, Russian Federation dResearch Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, 119121 Moscow, Russian Federation @Corresponding author E-mail: joz@mail.ru

N-Substituted hydrazones of nickel complexes of fi-octaethylporphyrin and tetraethyl ester of coproporphyrin I were obtained. These compounds can serve as intermediate compounds for the preparation ofmeso-functionalized derivatives ofporphyrins by means of various reactions. In the first stage Vilsmeier-Haack reaction was carried out by the interaction of nickel complexes offi-octaethylporphyrin and tetraethyl ester of coproporphyrin I with N,N-dimethylformamide and phosphorus(V) oxochloride forming the so-called "phosphorus complex ", which was hydrolyzed with saturated solution of sodium acetate. The corresponding meso-formyl derivatives of metal porphyrins were obtained as a result. Synthesis of the hydrazones was carried out by the reactions of meso-formyl derivatives with the hydrazines using trifluoroacetic acid as a catalyst. The result of the reaction was formation of hydrazones in the form of a mixture of E- and Z-isomers, which were separated using preparative thin layer chromatography. Thus a series of hydrazones with different substituents at the nitrogen atom was obtained. The structures of all obtained compounds were determined using the methods of NMR spectroscopy, electronic absorption spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. For nickel complex of tosylhydrazone derivative of fi-octaethylporphyrin the crystal structure was determined using X-ray diffraction. X-ray analysis shows that porphyrin molecules in the crystal form dimers bonded by two hydrogen bonds between the hydrogen atom of the NH-group of hydrazone and the oxygen atom of the sulfonate groups.

Keywords: Octaethylporphyrin, coproporphyrin, porphyrin hydrazones, nickel complexes, Vilsmeier-Haack reaction.

Introduction

Porphyrins and their structural analogues are a vital chemical unit, they are necessary for numerous biologically significant processes, such as photosynthesis, transportation and storage of oxygen in tissues of living organisms. Porphy-rins and metalloporphyrins are widely distributed in nature, the aromatic system of porphyrin bonds makes them very promising for use in various fields of science and technology. Due to their unique photophysical and photochemical properties, porphyrins and metalloporphyrins are used as various sensors in bioanalysis,[1,2] active substances of drugs in the diagnosis and therapy of cancer.[3]

The fundamental task, addressed by numerous studies in the fields of bioorganic and medical chemistry, is the creation of new drugs based on porphyrin conjugates with vari-

ous biologically active compounds and other functional frag-ments,[4-7] having specified properties, such as low toxicity, hydrophilicity, high selectivity of accumulation and distribution in affected cells and tissues. Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions are widely used to produce various functionalized derivatives of mono- and oligoporphyrins, which possess practically useful properties.[8-10] Most of such reactions are associated with the combination of halogenated porphyrins with various reagents. At the same time, the preparation of mono-meso-halogenated derivatives of y#-alkyl substituted porphyrins is not an easy task. Reactions of meso-formyl derivatives of porphyrins can serve as alternative approach to the preparation of meso-functionalized derivatives.

Earlier, we obtained azomethine derivatives of palladium complexes of ^-octaethylporphyrin and coproporphyrin I,[11-13] as well as ruthenium complexes of coproporphy-

Синтез и исследование новых N-замещенных гидразонов Ni(II) комплексов jft-октаэтилпорфирина и тетраэтилового эфира копропорфирина I

A. О. Шкирдова,а,ь И. А. Замилацков,а@ Н. М. Станецкая,а В. А. Тафеенко,с

B. С. Тюрин,а В. В. Чернышев,ас Г. В. Пономарев^ А. Ю. Цивадзеа

аИнститут физической химии и электрохимии имени А.Н. Фрумкина РАН, 119071 Москва, Россия ъМосковский технологический университет, Институт тонких химических технологий, 119571 Москва, Россия Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова, Химический факультет, 119991 Москва, Россия АНаучно-исследовательский институт биомедицинской химии имени В.Н. Ореховича, 119121 Москва, Россия @E-mail: joz@mail.ru

Были получены N-замещенные гидразоны никелевых комплексов в-октаэтилпорфирина и тетраэтилового эфира копропорфирина I. Такие соединения могут быть использованы для получения мезо-функционализирован-ных производных порфиринов при помощи различных реакций. На первом этапе по реакции Вильсмейера-Хаака путем взаимодействия никелевых комплексов в-октаэтилпорфирина и тетраэтилового эфира копропорфирина I с Ы,Ы-диметилформамидом и оксохлоридом фосфора(У) образовался так называемый «фосфорный комплекс», который гидролизовали насыщенным раствором ацетата натрия. В результате были получены соответствующие мезо-формилпроизводные металлопорфиринов. Синтез гидразонов проводили путем реакции полученных мезо-формилпроизводных с гидразинами, используя трифторуксусную кислоту в качестве катализатора. В результате реакции происходило образование гидразонов в виде смеси E- и Z-изомеров, которые разделяли при помощи препаративной тонкослойной хроматографии. Таким образом был получен ряд гидразонов с различными заместителями у атома азота. Строение всех полученных соединений установлено с помощью методов ЯМР спектроскопии, электронной спектроскопии поглощения, а также масс-спектрометрии. Для никелевого комплекса тозилгидразонового производного в-октаэтилпорфирина установлена структура при помощи рентгеноструктурного анализа. Обнаружено, что молекулы в кристалле образуют димеры, связанные двумя водородными связями между атомами водорода NH-группы гидразона и атомом кислорода сульфогруппы.

Ключевые слова: Октаэтилпорфирин, копропорфирин, порфириновые гидразоны, комплексы никеля, реакция Вильсмейера-Хаака.

rin I.[14-15] The reaction between pyropheophorbide a methyl ester and hydrazine hydrate has been studied and the optimal conditions for the selective synthesis of corresponding hydrazones and azines have been found. In continuation of the work on meso-fuctionalized porphyrins we carried out the synthesis of previously unknown ^-substituted hydra-zones of Ni(II) complexes of jff-octaethylporphyrin and tet-raethyl ester of coproporphyrin I.[16] Such porphyrins can be precursors of the variety of meso-functionalized porphyrins including meso-(2-iodvinyl)porphyrins[17] being a convenient substrate for the synthesis of porphyrin conjugates via catalytic cross-coupling reactions.

Experimental

Measurements

UV-Vis electronic absorption spectra were registered using U-2900 (Hitachi) spectrophotometer and quartz rectangular cells of 1-10 mm path length. 'H (600 MHz) NMR spectra were recorded at T = 298 K with a Bruker Avance III 600 spectrometer in CDCl3. Chemical shifts 5 are quoted in parts per million (ppm) downfield

of tetramethylsilane. Coupling constants are given in Hz. 13C (150 or 75 MHz) NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 600 or Bruker AVANCE I 300 in CDCl3, respectively. The LDI-TOF mass-spectra were obtained on a Ultraflex-II mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) in a positive ion mode using reflection mode (20 mV target voltage) without matrix. The m/z values are given for the major isotope of nickel (Ni-58).

Materials

All commercial reagents were purchased and used without further purification. Solvents were purified by standard procedures: CH2Cl2 and 1,2-dichloroethane were distilled over calcium hydride under argon.

All reactions were performed under protection from direct light under argon and monitored using electronic absorption spectroscopy and by TLC Macherey-Nagel Alugram SIL G/UV254 silica gel 60 UV254. Silica gel 40/60 (Merck) was used for column and flash chromatography. Silica gel 60 (Merck) at 20x20 cm plates with a layer thickness of 1 mm was used for preparative TLC. A mixture of solvents: methylene chloride - methanol was used as an eluent.

Synthesis

The coproporphyrin I was obtained according to the method described by K. Smith.[18] ¿8-Octaethylporphyrin was obtained

by monopyrrole condensation described by Johnson.[19] Ni(II) complexes of coproporphyrin I tetraethyl ester and /-octaethylporphyrin were prepared according to procedure described by K. Smith.[20]

A typical procedure for synthesis of Ni(II) formyl derivatives of porphyrins. To a solution of Ni(II) porphyrin complex (0.073 mmol) in 10 ml of dry 1,2-dichloroethane the Vilsmeier reagent, in situ formed from POCl3 (1.5 ml, 21.5 mmol) and N,N-dimethyl-formamide (1.5 ml, 25.9 mmol), was added at 60 oC. The resulting mixture was stirred for 2 hours at the same temperature and the reaction was monitored by TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH = 100:4). Then the solvent was evaporated in vacuum and the residue obtained was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (50 ml) and washed with H2O (50 ml) then 20 ml of saturated solution of sodium acetate was added and stirred at 50 oC for 2 hrs monitoring by TLC. After that the organic layer was separated, washed by water (2x10 ml), dried with sodium sulfate and the solvent was evaporated in vacuum and the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel) with eluent CH2Cl2:MeOH = 100:1 to afford the Ni(II) complex of meso-formyl substituted porphyrins.

Ni(II) complex of meso-formylcoproporphyrin I tetraethyl ester (7). Yield 78 %. LDI-TOF MS m/z: 851.6. Calcd. for [M+H]+ 851.3. UV-Vis Xmax (CHCl3) nm: 401, 423, 560, 645. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 278 K) 5H ppm: 1.17-1.18 (6H, m, OCH2CH3), 1.21 (3H, t, 3J=7.25, OCH2CH3), 1.32 (3H, t, 3J=7.26, OCH2CH3), 2.84 - 3.11 (8H, m, /-CH2), 3.10 (3H, s, /-CH3), 3.35 (3H, s, /-CH3), 3.41 (6H, s, /-CH3), 3.95 (2H, q, 3J=7.90, /-CH2), 4.14-4.27 (14H, m, OCH2CH3+/-CH2), 9.55 (1H, s, 15CH), 9.56 (2H, s, 5,20CH), 10.71 (1H, s, CH in CH=O).

Ni(II) complex of meso-formyl-/-octaethylporphyrin (2). Yield 74 %. LDI-TOF MS m/z: 619.5. Calcd. for [M+H]+ 619.3. UV-Vis Xmax (CHCl3) nm: 402, 423, 526, 561, 652. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 278 K) 5^7 ]ppm: 1.(59-1.79 (24H, m, CH2CH3), 3.73-3.81 (16H, m, CH,CH3), 9.33 (2H, s, 5,20CH), 9.36 (1H, s, 15CH), 11.92 (1H, s, CH=O). The spectra correspond to the published data within the limits of insignificant deviations.[21]

A typical procedure for synthesis of Ni(II) hydrazone derivatives of porphyrins 3-5, 9. To a solution of Ni(II) complex of meso-formylporphyrins (2 or 7) (0.05 mmol) in 16 ml of dry dichloro-methane p-tosylhydrazine (0.05 mmol) and trifluoroacetic acid (0.05 mmol) were added. The resulting mixture was stirred for 4 hours at 45 oC monitoring by TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH = 100:4). Then the solvent was evaporated in vacuum and the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel) with eluent CH2Cl2 to afford a mixture of E- and Z-isomers of Ni(II) complexes of meso-hydra-zone derivatives of porphyrins.

Ni(II) complex of meso-hydrazone derivative of /-octa-ethylporphyrin (3). Yield 58 %. LDI-TOF MS m/z: 633.5. Calcd. for [M+H]+ 633.3. UV-Vis Xmax (CHCl3) nm: 401, 526, 562. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 278 K) 5H ppm: 163 (6H, t, 3J=7.42, CH2CH3), 1.74 (6H, t, 3J=7.63, CH2CH3), 1.78 (12H, t, 3J=7.78, CH2CH3), 2.23 (2H, s, NH2), 3.73-3.78 (4H, m, CH,CH3), 3.82-3.87 (12H, m, CH,CH3), 9.51 (1H, s, 15CH), 9.52 (2H, s, 5,20CH), 10.87 (1H, s, CH=N).

Z-isomer of the Ni(II) complex of meso-tosylhydrazone derivative of /-octaethylporphyrin (4a). Yield 64 %. LDI-TOF MS m/z: 787.2. Calcd. for [M+H]+ 787.3. UV-Vis Xmax (CHCl3) nm: 401, 527, 565. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 278 K) 5H ppm™!^ (6H, t, 3J=7.42, CH2CH3), 1.76 (6H, t, 3J=7.73, CH2CH3), 1.84 (6H, t, 3J=7.52, CH2CH3), 1.85 (6H, t, 3J=7.49, CH2CH3), 2.46 (3H, s, CH3(Tos)), 3.54 (2H, m, CH,CH3), 3.68 (2H, m, CH,CH3), 3.77 (2H, m, CH,CH3), 3.92 (10H, m, CH,CH3), 6.03 (1H, s, NH), 7.17-7.19 (2H, m, AA' part of AA'XX' spin system, C(2)H and C(6)H in 4-MeC6H4), 7.39-7.40 (2H, m, XX' part of AA'XX( spin system, C(3)H and C(5)H in 4-MeC6H4), 9.59 (2H, s, 10,20CH), 9.62 (1H, s, 15CH), 9.933 (1H, s, CH=N).

E-isomer of the Ni(II) complex of meso-tosylhydrazone derivative of /-octaethylporphyrin (4b). Yield 16 %. LDI-TOF MS m/z: 787.2. Calcd. for [M+H]+ 787.9. UV-Vis Xmax (CHCl3) nm: 400, 526, 566. 1H NMR (CDCl 278 K) 5H ppmm1.41 (6H, t, 3J=7.68,

CH2CH3), 1.72 (6H, t, 3J=7.72, CH2CH3), 1.80 (12H, t, 3J=7.75, CH2CH3), 2.28 (3H, s, CH3(Tos)), 3.44 (4H, q, 3J=7.73, CHfH), 3.71 (4H, q, 3J=7.73, CH2CH3), 3.85 (8H, q, 3J=7.75, CHfH), 7.04-7.05 (2H, m, AA' part of AA'XX' spin system, C(2)H and C(6) H in 4-MeC6H4), 7.60-7.61 (2H, m, XX' part of AA'XX' spin system, C(3)H and C(5)H in 4-MeC6H4), 8.57 (1H, s, NH), 9.50 (2H, s, 10,20CH), 9.51 (1H, s, 15CH), 10.11 (1H, s, CH=N).

Ni(II) complex of meso-2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative of ß-octaethylporphyrin (major isomer) (5a). Yield 63 %. LDI-TOF MS m/z: 799.6. Calcd. for [M+H]+ 799.3. UV-Vis Xmax (CHCl3) nm: 399, 527, 564. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 278 K) 5H ppm:"".68 (6H, t, 3J=7.60, CH2CH3), 1.73 (6H, t, 3J=7.84, CH2CH3), 1.81 (6H, t, 3J=7.72, CH2CH3), 1.85 (6H, t, 3J=7.72, CH2CH3), 3.77-3.95 (16H, m, CH2CH3), 7.98-8.00 (1H, m, MX part of AMX spin system, C(6) H in 2,4-dinitroC6H3), 8.21-8.23 (1H, m, AX part of AMX spin system, C(5)H in 2,4-dinitroC6H3), 8.55-8.56 (1H, m, AM part of AMX spin system, C(3)H in 2,4-dinitroC6H3), 9.45 (1H, s, NH), 9.60 (2H, s, 5,20CH), 9.(63 (1H, s, 15CH), 10.211 (1H, s, CH=N).

Ni(II) complex of meso-tosylhydrazone derivative of coproporphyrin I tetraethyl ester (major isomer) (9a). Yield 75 %. LDI-TOF MS m/z: 1019.3. Calcd. for [M+H]+ 1019.4. UV-Vis Xmax (CHCl3) nm: 400, 525, 561. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 278 K) SH ppm: 1m2ü-1.23 (6H, m, OCH2CH3), 1.46 (6H, t, 3J=7.16, OCH2CH3), 2.28 (3H, s, CH3(Tos)), 3.01-3.04 (4H, m, ß-CH2), 3.05 (3H, s, ß-CH3), 3.09-3.14 (4H, m, ß-CH2,), 3.35 (3H, s, ß-CH3), 3.45 (6H, s, ß-CH3), 4.11-4.22 (14H, m, OCH2CH3 + ß-CH2), 4.39 (2H, q, 3J=7.20, OCH2CH3), 7.00-7.02 (2H, m, AA' part of AA'XX' spin system, C(2)H find C(6)H in 4-MeC6H4), 7.57-7.59 (2H, m, XX' part of AA'XX' spin system, C(3)H and C(5)H in 4-MeC6H4), 9.52 (1H, s, NH), 9.57 (1H, s, 15CH), 9.59 (1H, s, 20CH), 9.61 (1H, s, 5CH), 10.23 (1H, s, CH=N).

A one-pot procedure for synthesis of Ni(II) non-substituted hydrazone derivatives of coproporphyrin I tetraethyl ester. To a solution of Ni(II) coproporphyrin I tetraethyl ester (6) (25 mg, 0.029 mmol) in 10 ml of dry 1,2-dichloroethane the Vilsmeier reagent, in situ formed from POCl3 (1 ml, 10.5 mmol) and N,N-dimethylformamide (1 ml, 13 mmol), was added at 60 oC. The resulting mixture was stirred for 2 hours at the same temperature and the reaction was monitored by TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH = 100:4). Then the solvent was evaporated in vacuum and the residue obtained was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (50 ml) and washed with H2O (50 ml) then dried with sodium sulfate and the solvent was evaporated in vacuum and the residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (30 ml) and 0.1 ml of hydrazine hydrate was added and the reaction was monitoring by TLC (CH2Cl2:MeOH = 100:1). After the end of the reaction the reaction mixture was washed by water (2x10 ml), dried with sodium sulfate and the solvent was evaporated in vacuum and the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel) with eluent CH2Cl2:MeOH = 100:1 to afford 22 mg (90 %) of the Ni(II) complex of meso-hydrazone derivative of copropor-phyrin I tetraethyl ester (8).

Ni(II) complex of meso-hydrazone derivative of coproporphyrin I tetraethyl ester (8). LDI-TOF MS m/z: 864.2. Calcd. for [M+H]+ 865.6. UV-Vis Xmax (CHCl3) nm: 400, 523, 559. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 278 K) SH ppm: U9-1.25 (9H, m, OCH2CH3), 1.36 (3H, t, 3J=7.21, OCH2CH3), 2.95 (2H, t, 3J=8.59, ß-CH2), 3.05 (2H, t, 3J=7.92, ß-CH2), 3.11 -3.14 (4H, m, ß-CH2), 3.25 (3H, s, ß-CH3), 3.42 (3H, s, ß-CH3), 3.43 (3H, s, ß-CH3), 3.44 (3H, s, ß-CH^, 4.03-4.06 (2H, m, ß-CH2), 4.16-4.23 (12H, m, OCH2CH3+ß-CH^, 4.31 (2H, q, 3J=7.23, OCH2CH3), 9.55 (1H, s, 15CH), 9.58 (1H, s, 20CH), 9.59 (1H, s, 5CH), 9.95 (1H, s, CH=N).

X-Ray diffraction study

Single-crystal X-ray data of 4a were collected by using STOE diffractometer Pilatus100K detector, focusing mirror collimation CuKa (1.54086 A) radiation, rotation method mode. STOE X-AR-EA software was used for cells refinement and data reduction. Data

collection and image processing was performed with X-Area 1.67 (STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany, 2013). Intensity data were scaled with LANA (part of X-Area) in order to minimize differences of intensities of symmetry-equivalent reflections (multiscan method).

Cell parameters: a=13.8720(9) A, ¿=16.7480(10) A, c=18.8310(11) A, a=108.132(7)°, p=108.132(7)°, y=103.986(8)°; V=3899.5(5) A3, Z=4, dcalc=1.342. Crystal class is triclinic, space group P-1.

The crystal structure was solved and refined with SHELX[22] program. The non-hydrogen atoms were refined by using the anisotropic full matrix least-square procedure.

All hydrogen atoms were placed in the calculated positions and allowed to ride on their parent atoms [C-H 0.93-0.98; Uiso (H) = 1.2 Ueq(parent atom)].

Refinement was made against 13038 reflections, 998 parameters were refined using 6 restraints. The final R 0.052 against 4935 F2>2a(F2), Rw = 0.119. Molecular geometry calculations were performed with the SHELX program, and the molecular graphics were prepared by using DIAMOND[23] software.

CCDC-1558823 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam. ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Results and Discussion

The goal of this work is the synthesis of meso-func-tionalized Ni(II) complexes of /-octaethylporphyrin and tet-raethyl ester of coproporphyrin I. It is known that /-alkyl substututed meso-functionalized porphyrins and their metal complexes can be easily further transformed[24-27] to compounds with significant bathochromic shift of the absorption bands even up to the nearest IR region. meso-Fuctionaliza-tion of porphyrins was carried out using the Vilsmeier-Haack reaction which has a wide application for the introduction of formyl group which can be further transformed to various other functions.[28]

Tetraethyl ester of coproporphyrin I and /-octa-ethylporphyrin were selected as objects for the modification as they represent two different types of porphyrins with free meso-positions: natural derivative (coproporphyrin) and fully

synthetic compound (/-octaethylporphyrin). Synthetic /-octaethylporphyrin is lipophilic, well soluble in organic solvents and often used as a model compound. Coproporphyrin is more hydrophilic due to four carboxyl groups increasing its solubility in aqueous media and its tetraethyl ester is also well soluble in organic solvents. Porphyrins were used in a form of nickel complexes due to the enhanced reactivity of the metal complexes compared to the free bases porphyrins in electrophilic substitution reactions.[8,29] It is also known that nickel complexes are subjected to of Vilsmeier-Haack formylation with the highest reaction rate.[30]

Synthesis

To obtain ^-substituted hydrazones of metal complexes of /-octaethylporphyrin and coproporphyrin I we used a method based on the interaction of meso-formyl derivatives of metal porphyrins with ^-substituted hydrazines. meso-Formyl metal porphyrin derivatives were synthesized by formylation with the Vilsmeier-Haack reaction (Scheme 1). Nickel complex of OEP 1 was formylated using Vilsmeier reagent, which was formed by the interaction of ^,^-dimethylformamide (DMF) with phosphorus(V) oxochloride POCl3 leading to the formation of the so-called "phosphorus complex".[28,31-33]

Next "phosphorus complex" was hydrolyzed with saturated solution of sodium acetate, resulting in nickel complex of the meso-formyl-/-octaethylporphyrin 2. It should be noted that the reactions proceeded without the formation of byproducts and target products were obtained with high yields 78-80 %.

The next step was the interaction of the nickel complex of meso-formyl-/-octaethylporphyrin 2 with the corresponding ^-substituted hydrazines in the presence of tri-fluoroacetic acid as a catalyst (Scheme 1). From the nickel complex of /-octaethylporphyrin thus hydrazone derivatives of the following hydrazines were obtained: hydrazine (3), tosylhydrazine (4) and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (5). 'H NMR of the products contained all peaks confirming their structures. It should be noted that the ^-substituted hydra-

3: R = NH2 4: R = NHTs

Scheme 1. Synthesis of meso-hydrazones of /-octaethylporphyrin (A) and tetraethyl ester of coproporphyrin I (B). Макрогетер0циmbl /Macroheterocycles 2017 70(4-5) 480-486

zones were formed as mixtures of Z, ^-isomers in 4:1 ratio according to *H NMR containing doubling signals of less intensity. Chromatography separation mostly allowed obtaining the major isomers as the minor isomers were transforming to the major ones on the silica. For the tosylhydrazone derivative 4 we succeeded in isolation of the minor ^-isomer 4b along with the major Z-isomer 4a.

Mass spectra of the hydrazones contain several clusters possessing two major distinctive peaks with a difference of 2 units with a heavier peak of lower intensity. This is typical pattern corresponding to the presence of nickel atom reflecting its isotopic composition. The m/z values are given for the major isotope of nickel (Ni-58). The clusters of the spectra are quite complicated reflecting presence of the products of the transformations of the starting porphyrin leading to additional peaks to the cluster. For example, peaks

of lower masses (M-2, M-4) are related to the consequent hydrogen loss from the condensed cycle and ethyl sub-stituents leading to conjugated C=C double bonds. Cluster peaks in the mass spectra partially correspond to protonated molecules and ionization of the hydrazones were probably achieved via protonation which could be occur with the help of other molecules of the compound. Thus, the substance in the mass-spectrometer could play a role of the matrix for itself. The most intense cluster is related not to a molecular ion of the product 4 (m/z 787.2) being the third intensive, but it is the peak of the protonated molecular ion with a mass corresponding to a cyclization product (m/z 603.3) (Figure 1). The such cyclization product was not originally present in the reaction mixture. This fact reflects that the condensed cyclopentaneporphyrin could be formed in the conditions of thermolysis of hydrazone porphyrins under laser

Figure 1. Mass spectrum of 4a,b.

Figure 2. Mass spectrum of 8.

irradiation in the mass-spectrometer similar to the known thermolysis of schiff bases of meso-formylporphyrins.[34"35] The second intense peak belongs to the product or loss of the tosyl group (m/z 631.3). Loss of NH from the latter and (or) loss of TsNH from 4 possibly gave the peak with m/z 616.15 corresponding to the protonated nitrile. The condensed cyclopentaneporphyrin (m/z 603.3) could also lose acetylene to give a peak 577.3.

Synthesis of hydrazone derivatives of coproporphy-rin I was carried out analogously (Scheme 1). Formylation of nickel complex of tetraethyl ester of coproporphyrin I 6 led to the meso-formyl derivative 7 and following reaction with hydrazines gave the corresponding coproporphyrin hy-drazones 8 and 9. The latter was also obtained as the mixture of Z,¿-isomers 9a,b.

Mass spectrum of compound 8 was in main features similar to the compound 4 and also contained clusters corresponding to molecular ions of hydrazone (m/z 864.3), the cyclopentaneporphyrin (m/z 835.3) and product of loss of NH2 (protonated nitrile) (m/z 848.3) (Figure 2). Therefore, the thermolytic cyclization of porphyrin hydrazones proceeding with different porphyrins is general reaction leading to condensed cyclopentaneporphyrins.

X-Ray diffraction study

due to the presence of bulky substituent at meso-position. It should also be noted that the bond lengths of the nickel with all four nitrogens are different.

Figure 3. Crystal structure of 4a. The hydrogen atoms (except for hydrogen atoms at nitrogen) are omitted for clarity. Hydrogen and n-bonds are shown with thin dashed lines. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at 50 % probability level.

Some hydrazine derivatives of porphyrins were crystallized and the crystal structure was investigated via single crystal X-ray diffraction. X-Ray structure of the major isomer of 4a is presented at Figure 3. The asymmetric part of the unit cell contains two independent molecules, the atoms of which are designated as NN and NNA (Figure 3). In the crystal, the molecules NN and NNA differ from each other. Namely, the direction of methyl groups of ethyl substituents is not the same. In the NN molecule, five methyl groups, among of eight, have the same, as the tosyl fragment, direction with respect to the plane of the porphyrin core. Among the molecules of the NNA, seven methyl groups are located in the same mode as in the NN molecule and only one methyl group (C35A/C53A) is disordered over two positions with the atom occupancy of 0.52/0.48. Porphyrin cores in both molecules exhibit severely distorted saddle-shaped macrocycle conformations. Figure 4 shows the deviation (•103 A) of the atoms of the porphyrin in the molecules of NN and NNA from the rms plane drawn through the nitrogen atoms N1-N2-N3-N4 and N1A-N2A-N3A-N4A, respectively. The conformation of the porphyrin rings is affected by the interaction of the nickel atom (NN//NNA) with the n-system of the benzene cycle of the neighboring molecule (NNA//NN) (see Figure 3). The distances between the nickel atom Ni1A and the carbon atoms C39-C44 lie in the range from 3.707 to 3.787 A, that is, practically all distances are the same, while the distances between the nickel atoms Ni1 and C39A-C44A differ significantly - 3.517 A is the shortest distance Ni1-C44A, and 4.180 A is the largest distance between Ni1 and carbons atoms C39A-C44A. In addition, the molecules NN and NNA are linked together by hydrogen bonds N5H5-O1A and N5AH5A-O1, thus, in the crystal, molecules NN and NNA form dimers. The porphyrin ring of 4a apparently is not flat (Figure 4). This can be partly

Figure 4. Top view of the two crystallographically independent NN and NNA of Ni(II) porphyrins cores of 4a. Numbers give the deviation of the macrocycle atoms from the least-squares plane of the four nitrogen atoms (in Â-103).

Conclusions

The method of meso-functionalization based on meso-formylation following reaction with hydrazine leads to the corresponding meso-hydrazone derivatives of porphyrins. This method was shown to be easy and convenient by the successfully carried out synthesis of ^-substituted hydrazones of nickel complexes of /-octaethylporphyrin and tetraethyl ester of coproporphyrin I. Such porphyrins can serve as precursors to various photosensitizers due to the significant influence of the meso-substituents on the electronic absorption spectra allowing to tune photosensitizing properties by variation of meso-substituents. This approach can also be used to obtain porphyrin conjugates with other fragments via further transformations of porphyrins hydrazones. The X-ray study of the crystal structure of the nickel complex of tosyl

hydrazone derivative of /-octaethylporphyrin revealed that the porphyrin molecules form dimers bonded by two hydrogen bonds between the hydrogen atom of the NH-group of hydrazone and the oxygen atom of the sulfonate group. Investigations of the further transformation of the hydrazone functional group of the obtained porphyrins to the meso-(2-iodvinyl) function are currently in progress.

Acknowledgements. The X-ray part of this study was supported by the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation, grant No. RFMEFI61616X0069. The access to STOE diffractometer Pilatus100K was granted by the M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University Program of Development. The other measurements were performed using equipment of CKP FMI IPCE RAS.

References

1. Papkovsky D.B., O'Riordan T.S. Journal of Fluorescence 2005, 15, 569-584.

2. Dolphin D. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4151-4202.

3. Manivannan E., Yihui C., Penny J., Ravindra K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 340-362.

4. Liu F., SohA., Ni Ya., Lim Yi., Mohanram H., Bhattacharjya S., Xing. B. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 1639-1647.

5. Tam N.C.M., McVeigh P.Z., MacDonald T.D., Farhadi A., Wilson B.C., Zheng G. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 1726-1730.

6. Dosselli R., Gobbo M., Bolognini E., Campestrini S., Reddi E. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 35-38.

7. Gianferrara T., Bergamo A., Bratsos I., Milani B., Spagnul C., Sava G., Alessio E. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 4678-4690.

8. Tyurin VS., Uglov A., Beletskaya I.P., Stern C., Guilard R. Survey of Synthetic Routes for Synthesis and Substitution in Por-phyrins. In: Handbook of Porphyrin Science, Vol. 23 (Kadish K.M., Smith K.M., Guilard R., Eds.), Singapore: World Scientific, 2012. p. 81-279.

9. Averin A.D., Yakushev A.A., Beletskaya I.P. Macroheterocy-cles 2016, 9, 108-120.

10. Hiroto S., Miyake Yo., Shinokubo H. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 2910-3043.

11. Volov A.N., Zamilatskov I.A., Mikhel I.S., Erzina D.R., Pono-marev G.V., Koifman O.I., Tsivadze A.Yu. Macroheterocycles 2014, 7, 256-261.

12. Tyurin V.S., Erzina D.R., Zamilatskov I.A., Chernyadyev A.Yu., Ponomarev G.V., Yashunskiy D.V., Maksimova A.V., Krasnovskiy A.A., Tsivadze A.Yu. Macroheterocycles 2015, 4, 376-383.

13. Erzina D.R., Zamilatskov I.A., Kurochkina N.M., Ponomarev G.V., Tafeenko V.A. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 2017, 73(2), 68-71.

14. Andreev S.V., Zverev S.A., Zamilatskov I.A., Kurochkina N.M., Ponomarev G.V., Fitch A.N., Chernyshev V.V Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 2017, 73(1), 47-51.

15. Zverev S.A., Andreev S.V., Zamilatskov I.A., Kurochkina N.M., Tyurin V.S., Senchikhin I.N., Ponomarev G.V., Erzina D.R., Chernyshev V.V. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 91, 14621467.

16. Lonin I.S., Belyaev E.S., Tsivadze A.Yu., Ponomarev G.V., Lonina N.N., Fitch A.N., Chernyshev V.V. Macroheterocycles 2017, 10, 474-479.

17. Shastin A.V., Korotchenko V.N., Varseev G.N., Nenaidenko V.G., Balenkova E.S. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 39, 403-407.

18. Smith K.M. J. Chem. Soc, Perkin Trans. 1 1972, 1471-1475.

19. Sessler J.L., Mozaffari A., Johnson M.R. Org. Synth. 1992, 70, 68-75.

20. Shelnutt J.A., Medforth C.J., Berber M.D., Barkigia K.M., Smith K.M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4077-4087.

21. Arnold D., Johnson A.W., Winter M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1977, 1643-1647.

22. Sheldrick G.M. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112-122.

23. Brandenburg K. DIAMOND, Release 2.1d; Crystal Impact GbR: Bonn, Germany, 2000.

24. Inhoffen H.H., Fuhrhof J.-H., Voigt H., Brockmann H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1966, 695, 133-143.

25. Brockmann Jr. H., Bliesener K., Inhoffen H.H. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1968, 718, 148-161.

26. Ponomarev G.V., Evstigneeva R.P., Preobrazhenskiy N.A. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1967, 3, 303.

27. Torpey J.W., Montellano P.R.O. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 60, 21952199.

28. Ponomarev G.V. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1994, 30, 14441465.

29. Schlozer R., Fuhrhop J.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1975, 14, 363.

30. Buchler J.W., Dreher C., Herget G. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1988, 43-54.

31. Ponomarev G.V., Evstigneeva R.P., Stromnov V.N., Preo-brazhenskii N.A. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1967, 2, 479-480.

32. Ponomarev G.V. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1996, 32, 12631280.

33. Ponomarev G.V., Yashunskiy D.V., Moskovkin A.S. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1997, 33, 271-275.

34. Ponomarev G.V., Shul'ga A.M. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1984, 20, 383-388.

35. Ponomarev G.V., Shul'ga A.M., Rozynov B.V. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1993, 29, 155-162.

Received 28.11.2017 Accepted 28.12.2017