Научная статья на тему 'Symbiotic potential of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on biological products in agrocoenosis of the Right-Bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine'

Symbiotic potential of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on biological products in agrocoenosis of the Right-Bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine Текст научной статьи по специальности «Биологические науки»

CC BY
182
39
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Журнал
Ukrainian Journal of Ecology
Область наук
Ключевые слова
Snap beans / agrocenosis / tuberous bacteria / symbiotic productivity / yield

Аннотация научной статьи по биологическим наукам, автор научной работы — S.A. Vdovenko, G.V. Pantsyreva, I.I. Palamarchuk, H.V. Lytvyniuk

The topicality of the research is determined to the search for new approaches to the development of technological techniques for growing beans, taking into account the soil-climatic conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine. The research on the dynamics of the formation and the symbiotic apparatus functioning has been carried out; the influence of the nodule bacterium’s new strains on the activity of the symbiotic apparatus formation in the snap bean agrocenosis (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has been investigated. It is proved that the use of biopreparations provides an increase in interphase periods. At the same time, the influence of the complex application of inoculation with bacterial preparations of Azotophyte-l, Biomag, Biocomplex-BTU-l on the basic symbiotic productivity indexes of snap bean crops, in particular the number and weight of active bulbils, the active symbiotic potential and yield of beans long pod of sorts of early ripeness group were studied. It was established that the use of the bacterial preparation of Biocomplex-BTU-l contributes to the increase of the number and the mass of bulb formations on the root system of the Zironka sort. The usage of a bacterial preparation Biocomplex-BTU-l contributes to receiving 18.4 t/ha or 9.4 t/ha of crop rise, and the correlation between yield and studied indexes were determined. The usage of Azotophyte-l and Biomag for pre-crop preparations of bean seeds is ineffective.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Symbiotic potential of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on biological products in agrocoenosis of the Right-Bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine»

Ukrainian Journal of Ecology

Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2018,8(3), 309-314

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Symbiotic potential of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on biological products in agrocoenosis of the Right-

Bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine

S.A. Vdovenko, G.V. Pantsyreva, I.I. Palamarchuk, H.V. Lytvyniuk

Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Sonyachna str. 3, Vinnytsia, 21000, Ukraine. E-mail: apantsyreva@ukr.net

Received: 18.07.2018. Accepted: 20.08.2018

The topicality of the research is determined to the search for new approaches to the development of technological techniques for growing beans, taking into account the soil-climatic conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine. The research on the dynamics of the formation and the symbiotic apparatus functioning has been carried out; the influence of the nodule bacterium's new strains on the activity of the symbiotic apparatus formation in the snap bean agrocenosis (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has been investigated. It is proved that the use of biopreparations provides an increase in interphase periods. At the same time, the influence of the complex application of inoculation with bacterial preparations of Azotophyte-l, Biomag, Biocomplex-BTU-l on the basic symbiotic productivity indexes of snap bean crops, in particular the number and weight of active bulbils, the active symbiotic potential and yield of beans long pod of sorts of early ripeness group were studied. It was established that the use of the bacterial preparation of Biocomplex-BTU-l contributes to the increase of the number and the mass of bulb formations on the root system of the Zironka sort. The usage of a bacterial preparation Biocomplex-BTU-l contributes to receiving 18.4 t/ha or 9.4 t/ha of crop rise, and the correlation between yield and studied indexes were determined. The usage of Azotophyte-l and Biomag for pre-crop preparations of bean seeds is ineffective. Keywords: Snap beans; agrocenosis; tuberous bacteria; symbiotic productivity; yield

Introduction

The history of discovering the tuberous bacteria is closely connected with studying legumes used by people. The first mentions about growing legumes date from 4-5 millennia BC (Parmar et al., 1999, Figueiredo et al., 2007, Rajendran et al., 2012). Symbiosis with tuberous bacteria is one of the most effective systems of biological nitrogen fixation, which is of great ecological significance. In the bean-nodule symbiosis, a combination of two biochemical processes-nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis is received, with a help of which the nitrogen-carbohydrate balance of the plant organism stabilizes (Albinus, 2008; Beneduzi, 2012; Figueiredo et al., 2010). Microorganisms introduced into the root zone are capable to form active vegetative-bacterial associations, activate the processes of nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis, stimulate the development of the root system, increase the absorption capacity of the root system, which in general has a positive effect on the degree of plant absorption of nutrients from the soil (Patika, 1999; Chen, 1994). That's why the study of biological and biochemical features of the fixation of molecular nitrogen process by microorganisms gets a paramount importance. The most practical significance in the enrichment of the soils with nitrogen, due to its absorption from the air, has groups of soil microorganisms-tuberous bacteria which fix molecular nitrogen in symbiosis with leguminous plants. The representatives of the family of tuberous bacteria, namely Bradyrhizobium, Rhizobium Mezorhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Azorhizobium and Allorhizobium, are soil microorganisms which, in addition to free-living heterotrophic organisms, have a stage of symbiotic reciprocity with legumes plants (Martyniuk et al., 2012; Mohamed et al., 2009). The important role in the relationships of micro-and macrosymbiote is devoted to the genetic nature of the strain and the plant sort. The stresses plants and bacteria fall under (low and high temperatures, lack of moisture or overwatering, low acidity of the soil) can negatively affect bean nodule symbiosis (Antipchuk, 1994; Margeson, et al., 1980). Optimal conditions for effective action of bacterial fertilizers are: 20-25 °C, pH 6.5-7.5, 60-70% of total moisture content (Volkogon, 2011; Kloepper et al., 1980).

Bean vegetable is considered as one of the most important legumes in the world agriculture, which accumulates biological nitrogen with a help of symbiosis with tuberous bacteria. Along with the traditional bean sorts, it is a valuable high-protein plant whih is used for human nutrition. The high level of protein and minerals makes it essential in overcoming the problem of plant protein in Ukraine and the world (Scheer, 2004; Tahmasebpour et al., 2013; Watson et al., 2012). In agricultural production, the positive role of legumes depends on the life of tuberous bacteria with which these plants are in close symbiotic relationships. It can be considered that their productivity, the yield, the accumulation of biological nitrogen and vegetable proteins to a greater extent depend on the nature of the relationship between these two organisms formed in

each individual case. In the event of the active complex "legume plant-nodule bacteria", which is useful for both organisms for coexistence-a symbiosis is formed in the process of which the energy of the sun is used to bind the biological nature of atmospheric nitrogen (Kots, 2007; Jangu et al., 2011; Kalra, 1995).

One of the new environmental trends in modern agricultural science is the development of measures which increase the biological fixation of nitrogen and the mobilization of phosphorus and potassium on dropping legumes, which is essential for increasing the yields, for the decrease of the prime cost of agricultural products and energy consumption for its production, and environmentalizing the agriculture. In developed countries, the interest to the problem of biological nitrogen has increased significantly because of that. Currently, there are two main ways of increasing nitrogen fixation in agro-ecosystems. The first is the activation of the natural population of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms activity in the rhizosphere and on the roots, and the second is the inoculation of legumes seeds with high-act^ strains of nitrogen-fixating and phosphate-mobilizing microorganisms (Derevyansky, 2012; Petrichenko, 2012; Gamalero et al., 2011). The inoculation of seeds before sowing with active strains of nitrogen fixators is effective to increase the symbiotic and associative nitrogen fixation in ecosystems, which significantly compensates lack of nitrogen and increases plant productivity (Volkogon, 2008). Microorganisms associated with plants are considered as the factors of stimulating growth and development of plant (Schwartz, 2013; Derevyansky, 2012; Li et al., 2008). Taking to account the literary sources, it has been established that the biological method of growing leguminous plants, in the results of the usage of which the clean environment, environmentally safe high-quality products are received, the natural fertility of soils reproduces in the agricultural production, and it should become one of the main ways to improve agricultural production (Hamaoui et al., 2001; Osoro et al., 2014; Hung et al., 2004). Nitrogen fixing potential of legumes symbiosis with nodule bacteria in the soil is often limited with a low nitrogen-fixing activity of bacteria or a lack of their number in the zone of coming up seeds (Gupta et al., 2000; Hosseinpur et al., 2012). Due to this, an obligatory element of the growing legumes technology is the pre-sowing treatment of seeds with biopreparations based on selective strains of nodule bacteria, which do not only increase the productivity of plants, but also further the introduction of highly effective tuberous bacteria strains into the soil microbiocenosis (Budwina, 1997; Duparque, 1996).

Materials and methods of research

Researches on the study of the symbiotic potential of snap beans, depending on the biological preparations in vegetable agrocenosis, were conducted in 2016-2017 on the experimental field of the Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. Gray forest soli, medium loam soil, are characterized with the following indicators: humus content-medium (2.4%), P2O5 (271.2 mg/kg) and K2O (220.0 mg/kg) content is very high. Acidity of the soil is close to neutral. Field experiments were laid out with randomized blocks, a four-time repetition. During the research, the experimental scheme was developed in accordance with the existing methodology in the experimental case, and general observations, records, calculations with the snap beans Zironka sort were carried out.

The following preparations of biological origin were used in the experiment: Azotophyte-l, Biomag, Biocomplex-BTU-l The control variant was one in pre-sowing of which the seed cultivation was not used. During the experimental work field, statistical and laboratory methods of research were used, where the beginning and large appearance of button, the phase of budding, mass flowering, the beginning of technical ripeness and the end of the growing season were marked. During the growing season snap beans the number and weight of the tuberous bacteria were determined; the fruits were collected selectively, as they formed in accordance to the requirements of the current standard "DSTU 4794: 2007 Beans. The growing technology. General requirements (Gosstandart of Ukraine, 2009). The weight of the fruits from each area was determined separately with the weighing method. The results of snap bean yields indexes received in the researches were treated with the method of dispersion analysis (Bondarenko et al., 2001).

Results and discussion

The analysis of the number of bulbils and the weight of snap bean showed that the seed inoculation of Zironka sort promoted to increasing the total number of tuberous on the root system of the plant (Table 1).

In the phase of mass flowering, the largest number of tuberous was formed in the variant with the usage of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l-28.5 pc/plant, which was in 9.3 pc more than the control version. Biopreparations of Azotophyte-l contributed to the formation of tuberous in the amount of-23.6 pc/plant, which exceeded the variant without pre-sowing seed treatment at 4.4 pt/plant. The smallest increase, in comparison to control, among the used biopreparations was provided with Biomag, was 21.1 pc/plant, but in 2.5 pc per plant was less than the one used for Azotophyte-l and in 7.4 pc/plant less in comparison to the usage of Biocomplex-BTU-l.

The usage of biopreparations also affected on the mass of tuberous. It was the biggest in the variant with application of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l-0.62 g/plant. The usage of Azotophyte-l or Biomag contributed to receiving a smaller mass of tuberous in comparison to the variant with using Biocomplex-BTU-l, but the indicators were higher in comparison to the control variant. Thus, the application of Azotophyte-l and Biomag contributed to the formation of tuberous mass at the levels of 0.35 and 0.48 g/plant, which exceeded control variant in accordance in 0.12 and 0.25 g/plant.

Table 1. Effectiveness of symbiotic productivity of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on biopreparations, Zironka

sort (average for 2016-2017 year)._

Variant The number of bulbils, pc./plant Mass of bulbils, gram/plant

Phase of mass bloom

Symbiotic potential of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

311

Without pre-sowing cultivation (C*) 19.2 0.23

Azotophyte-l 23.6 0.48

Biomag 21.1 0.35

Biocomplex-BTU-l 28.5 0.62 Note: C*-control

The general symbiotic potential of snap beans in the Zironka sort determined its dependence on the biopreparations and bacteria which are the part of their basis (Table 2).

Table 2. The general symbiotic potential of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on biopreparations of Zironka sort (average for 2016-2017 y.), thousand kilo day/ha._

Variant Interphase periods of plants, thousand kilo day/ha

Mass Mass appearance- Mass appearance-the Mass appearance-the end

appearance of mass flowering beginning of technical ripeness of growing period

budding

Without pre-sowing 1.2 2.5 13.4 19

cultivation (C*)

Azotophyte-l 1.5 3.1 15.3 21.1

Biomag 1.3 2.7 14.9 20.4

Biocomplex-BTU-l 1.8 4.2 18.7 26.3

Note: C*-control

It is noted that the maximum index of the total symbiotic potential of beans is formed during the period of vegetation "mass appearance-budding" with the usage of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l-1.8 thousand kg, days/ha in the variant without the usage of biopreparations, the magnitude of the total symbiotic potential was 1.2 thousand kg, days/ha, which was less than the mentioned variant in 0.6 thousand kg. days/ha. At the same time, it was noted that the usage of Azotophyte-l or Biomag contributed to the increase in the formation of the general symbiotic potential, where the index was 1.5 and 1.3 thousand kg, days/ha.

With the onset of the next interphase periods, the general symbiotic potential during the vegetative period of the snap bean grew. The regularity between the studied variants in all interphase periods did not changed. Thus, the greatest potential was received with the usage of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l, in particular in the interphase period, "mass appearance - the end of vegetation", where the shown period was the highest and was 26.3 thousand kg day/ha, which exceeded the control variant in 7.3 thousand kg day/ha. The smallest increase in comparison to the variant, where the biopreparations were used, was with the usage of biopreparations Biomag-20.4 thousand kg, days/ha.

It was established that the magnitude of the active symbiotic potential increased gradually during the growing vegetative mass and vegetation period of snap beans (Figure 1). Thus, during the period of "mass appearance - budding" the active symbiotic potential varied depending on the studied variant. Application of biopreparations Biocomplex-BTU-l contributed to the formation of active symbiotic potential at the level of 6,7 thousand kg. days/ha, which is in 6,1 thousand kg. days/ha more than the control variant. The usage of Azotophyte-l or Biomag biopreparations also contributed to an increase of the active symbiotic potential of the plant. In the interphase period "mass appearance-mass flowering" the index was at the level of 0.72.0 thousand kg, days/ha. In the next interphase periods, the increase of the researched indicator was observed. In the interphase periods, "mass apearance-the beginning of technical ripeness" and "mass appearance-the end of the vegetation," the indicators varied in the following limits: with the usage of biopreparation Azotophyte-l it was 7.9-12.4 thousand kg. days/ha, and with Biomag-6.6-9.7 thousand kg, days/ha. It was established that the most propitious conditions for the formation of the maximum magnitude of the active symbiotic potential were noted in the variant with using Biocomplex-BTU-l-10.5-16.8 thousand kg, days/ha, which exceeded the variant where the pre-sowing seed preparation was not used.

Figure 1. Dynamics of the active symbiotic potential of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on the biopreparations in the Zironka sort (average for 2016-2017), ths, Kg, days/ha. C*-control.

On average, during the years of the research the significant impact of biopreparations on the yield of snap beans has been established. The maximum magnitude was received from the variant where the Biocomplex-BTU-l was used (Table 3).

Table 3. The yield of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Zironka sort depending on the usage of biopreparations,

tons/hectare._

Variant The yield, tons/hectare % ± before the control, tons/hectare %

2016 y. 2017 y. average

Without pre-sowing cultivation (C*) 12.9 19.2 16.1 -

Azotophyt-l 16.7 25.3 21 4.9

Biomag 19.1 23 21.1 5

Biocomplex-BTU-l 25.5 32.7 29.1 13

NIR05 0.98 0.83 - -

Note: C*-control.

At the same time, the yield was 29.1 t/ha and exceeded the control version in 13.0 t/ha. Also at the same time, the mathematical analysis has determined that the applied biopreparations affect both the yield of snap beans, the mass of tuberous and the biometric indixes of the plant. As a result of the usage of Azotophyte-l, the yield of beans is closely related to the mass of tuberous, where the correlation coefficient was r=0.99 and the total number of beans per plant and their length. The application of Biomag and Biocomplex-BTU-l also determined the close dependence of yields on the total number of beans and their length, but the magnitude of the correlation was somewhat lower and was r=0.61 -0.67. As a result of the application of Azotophyte-l, which is based on the nitrogen-fixing bacteria Azotobacter chroococcum and because of their active activity, contributed to the fact that the total number of beans, their length is closely related to the mass of the tuberous with the magnitude of the correlation coefficient r=-0.99 and r=-0.82 respectively. Because of the usage of Biomag or Biocomplex-BTU-l, the dependence of the number of beans on the mass of tuberous was also quite high and was r=0.69 and r=0.94.

Conclusions

On the base of carried out researches, the following conclusions can be drawn 1. The amount of accumulation of biological nitrogen is directly influenced with soil-climatic conditions and applied biopreparations 2. The maximum realization of the symbiotic potential of snap bean plants of Zironka sort is created with the usage of Biocomplex-BTU-l at a dose of 0.5 l/ha, 3. Treating snap beans seeds with Azotophyte-l with a dose of 0.5 liters per hectare or Biomag is ineffective.

References

Schwartz, A., Ortiz, I., Maymon, M., Herbold, C., Fujishige, N., Vijanderan, J., William, V., Kayoko, H., Andrew, D., Erin, R. S., DeMason, D. & Ann, M. H. (2013). Bacillus simplex-a little known PGPB with anti-fungal activity-alters pea legume root architecture and nodule morphology when coinoculated with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae. Agronomy, 3(4), 595-620. Chen, C., Bauske, E. M., Musson, G., Rodriguez-Kabana, R., & Kloepper, J. W. (1995). Biological control of Fusarium wilt on cotton by use of endophytic bacteria. Biological control, 5(1), 83-91.

Hamaoui, B., Abbadi, J., Burdman, S., Rashid, A., Sarig, S., & Okon, Y. (2001). Effects of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense

Symbiotic potential of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) 313

on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) and faba beans (Vicia faba) under different growth conditions. Agronomie, 21 (6-7), 553-560. Osoro, N. O., Kawaka, F., Naluyange, V., Ombori, O., Muoma, J. O., Amoding, A., & Maingi, J. M. (2014). Effects of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [mart.] solms) compost on growth and yield of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Lake Victoria Basin. Eur Int J Sc Tech, 3, 173-186.

Li, J. H., Wang, E. T., Chen, W. F., & Chen, W. X. (2008). Genetic diversity and potential for promotion of plant growth detected in nodule endophytic bacteria of soybean grown in Heilongjiang province of China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(1), 238246.

Figueiredo, M. D. V. B., Seldin, L., de Araujo, F. F., & Mariano, R. D. L. R. (2010). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: fundamentals and applications. In Plant growth and health promoting bacteria (pp. 21 -43). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Figueiredo, M. V. B., Martinez, C. R., Burity, H. A., & Chanway, C. P. (2008). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving nodulation and nitrogen fixation in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24(7), 1187-1193.

Petrychenko, V. F., Tihonovich, I. A., & Kots, S. J. (2012). Agricultural microbiology and balanced development of agro-ecosystems. Journal of Agricultural Science, (8), 5-11.

Petrychenko, V. F., Tihonovich, I. A., & Kots, S. J. (2012). Agricultural microbiology and balanced development of agro-ecosystems. Journal of Agricultural Science, (8), 5-11.

Antipchuk, A. F. (1994). Ecological aspects of selection of rhizobia and increase of the effectiveness of symbiosis. Physiology and Biochemistry of Crop Plants, 26(4), 315-333.

Beneduzi, A., Ambrosini, A., & Passaglia, L. M. (2012). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genetics and molecular biology, 35(4), 1044-1051.

Volkogon, V. V., Nadkernych, O. V., Krutyl, D. V., Kovalevskaya, T. M., Bondarenko, G. L. (2001). Biopreparations on the basis of tuber bacteria for increasing the yield of legumes. Methodology of Experimental Case in Vegetable and Melons. Kh, Osnov, p: 369.

Budwina, O. Y. (1997). Highly competitive strains of nodule bacteria-the basis of the effectiveness of biopreparations. Microbial Journal 59(4), 123-131.

Derevyansky, V. P. (2012). Efficiency of limestone fertilizers, microbial preparations and macro- and microelements on plant

resistance to diseases and soybean yield. Forages and Fodder Production. 72, 68-76.

DSTU 4794 (2007). Bean, Growing technology. General terms. K Gosstandart of Ukraine, p: 10.

Duparque, M. (1996). Main history steps of the pea improvement. Grain Legum, 12, 18.

Auxtero, E., Madeira, M., & Parker, D. (2012). Extractable Al and soil solution ionic concentrations in strongly leached soils from Northwest Iberia: effects of liming. ISRN Soil Science, 2012.

Kots, S. Y., Berehovenko, S. K., Kirichenko, E. V. (2007). Features of the interaction of plants and nitrogen fixing microorganisms. NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics. K Science Opinion, p: 315.

Gamalero, E., & Glick, B. R. (2011). Mechanisms used by plant growth-promoting bacteria. In Bacteria in agrobiology: Plant nutrient management (pp. 17-46). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Gupta, A., Gopal, M., & Tilak, K. V. B. (2000). Mechanism of plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria.

Hosseinpur, A. R., & Zarenia, M. (2012). Evaluating chemical extractants to estimate available potassium for pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in some calcareous soils. Plant Soil and Environment, 58(1), 42-48.

Hung, P. Q., & Annapurna, K. (2004). Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria in soybean (Glycine sp.). Omonrice, 12, 92-101.

Jangu, O. P., & Sindhu, S. S. (2011). Differential response of inoculation with indole acetic acid producing Pseudomonas sp. in green gram (Vigna radiata L.) and black gram (Vigna mungo L.). Microbiology Journal, 1(5), 159-173.

Kalra, Y. P. (1995). Determination of pH of soils by different methods: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 78(2), 310-324.

Kloepper, J. W., Schroth, M. N., & Miller, T. D. (1980). Effects of rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on potato plant development and yield. Phytopathology, 70(11), 1078-1082.

Margeson, J. H., Suggs, J. C., & Midgett, M. R. (1980). Reduction of nitrate to nitrite with cadmium. Analytical Chemistry, 52(12), 1955-1957.

Martyniuk, S., & Oron, J. (2008). Populations of rhizobia in some Polish soils not planted with legumes. Ekologija, 54(3). Volkogon, V. V., Zaryshniak, A. S., Grinyk, I. V. (2011). Methodology and practice of the use of microbial drugs in crop cultivation technologies. Kyiv: Agrarian Science. p: 153.

Mohamed, Z. K., El-Sayed, S. A., Radwan, T. E. E., & Abd, E. W. (2009). Potency evaluation of Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas fluorescens as biocontrol agents for root-knot nematodes in Egypt. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, (January), 93-102.

Parmar, N., & Dadarwal, K. R. (1999). Stimulation of nitrogen fixation and induction of flavonoid-like compounds by

rhizobacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 86(1), 36-44.

Patika, V. P. (1999). Microorganisms and alternative agriculture. Kyiv: Harvest, 176.

Rajendran, G., Patel, M. H., & Joshi, S. J. (2012). Isolation and characterization of nodule-associated Exiguobacterium sp. from the root nodules of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) and their possible role in plant growth promotion. International journal of microbiology, 2012.

Scheer, H. (2004). Chlorophylls and carotenoids. Encyclopedia of Biological Chemistry, 430-437.

Tahmasebpour, B. (2013). The effects of helping bacteria (Pseudomonas spp.) in nitrogen green beans fixation and nodulation

Ukarinian Journal of Ecology 314

with Rhizobium leguminosarumby phaseoli. International Journal of Science Inventions Today, 2(2), 556-566. Watson, M., & Mullen, R. (2007). Understanding soil tests for plant-available phosphorus. Unpublished.

Citation: Vdovenko, S.A., Pantsyreva, G.V., Palamarchuk, 1.1., Lytvyniuk, H.V. (2018). Symbiotic potential of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on biological products in agrocoenosis of the right-bank forest-steppe of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8(3), 309-314. I work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. License

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.