CC BY
12у
Соотношение (11) может служить теоретическим обоснованием рассмотрения энтропийных и эпсилон-энтропийных свойств баз знаний экспертных систем, связанных с понятием неопределенности [10, с. 383]. Практическим следствием выражения (11) может служить формирование динамических баз знаний, обладающих максимальной неопределенностью. Они позволяют выводить наиболее достоверные заключения в рамках решаемых проблем. Возможно применение (11) в муль-тиагентном моделировании систем, когда ситуационные стратегии поведения интеллектуальных агентов проявляются в их реакции на изменения состояния других агентов и среды в текущей ситуации. В наиболее простом случае рефлексивное поведение агентов определяется ситуационной стратегией «условие-действие» с продукционными правилами «если-то-иначе» [1]. Динамика рефлексивного поведения агентов зависит от последовательных условных событий и связана с изменением целого ряда факторов.
Список литературы:
1. Ивашкин Ю.А. Агентные технологии и мультиагентное моделирование систем: учебное пособие - М.: МФТИ, 2013 - 268с.
2. Краус М., Вошни Э. Измерительные информационные системы. - М.: мир, 1975 - 310с.
3. Куприянов В.В. Энтропия и информация: учебное пособие, Ч.1. - М.: МГГУ 2000 - 90с.
4. Куприянов В.В. Современные вопросы управления на основе системного подхода и теории информации. ГИАБ.-2014 -№2 - С.273-280
5. Куприянов В.В. вычислительные системы: учебное пособие. - М.: НИТУ «МИСиС», 2015 -45с.
6. Марасанов В.В. Современные методы анализа и синтеза автоматических систем/ В.В. Марасанов, Б.А. Марчуков, Б.В. Суворов, В.В. Куприянов - Кишинев: Изд-во: «Штинца», 1976 -126с.
7. Петров В.В., Усков А.С. основы динамической точности автоматических информационных устройств и систем - М.: Машиностроение, 1976 - 216с.
8. Шеннон К. Работы по теории информации и кибернетике - М.: ИИЛ, 1963 - 829с.
9. Kupriyanov V.V., Fomicheva O.E. Integra-tional technology methodologies and artificial intelligence// Proceed of 2 Inter. Conf. on transition to Advanced Market Economics, Warsaw, Poland, 1992 -pp. 134-136.
10. Kupriyanov V.V., Fedunec N.I., Fomicheva O.E. Expertize of complex object on the principles of knowledge bases// Proceed of 12 Inter. Conf. on Production Research, Lappeenranta, Finland, 1993 - pp. 383-384.
1Goncharova M. A., 2Brinck I. Yu., 3Dmitrienko N. A.
1Graduate student, Don state technical university, 2Dr.Sci.Tech., professor, Don state technical university, 3'Associate professor, Don state technical university,
STANDARD LEGAL APPLICATION TO WORKS AT HIGH CONDITIONS AS A METHOD OF INDUSTRIAL MOUNTAINEERING
In article the existing standard legislation which can be used to works at heights, is carried out by method of industrial mountaineering. The method is considered and analyzed. The main documents containing application is advisable measures for work safety conditions as labor protection procedure for industrial users for work under high conditions. On the basis of the analysis being incomplete and indirect action of documentary system providing the standard legislation in the sphere of labor protection of the industrial climbers was found out. Necessary requirements to regulating documents allowing people to regulate activities of industrial climbers are formulated.
Keywords: the regulatory basis, industrial mountaineering, works at height, safe engineering, individual protection equipment, labor protection.
There is no federal law regulating activities of industrial climbers on the territory of the Russian Federation, as well as they do not exist at sufficient level of standard providing this direction of works at height though the status of a working profession was officially approved in 2001 by the Ministry of Labor of the Russian Federation in the Resolution No. 40 which brought in ETKS specialty by No. 277a "The industrial climber is a worker of 5, 6 and 7 categories" [1]. The analysis of the regulatory base of a certain activity is rather informative and important procedure, determining the priority areas of work formulated in regulating documents on initial stage of scientific activities
and orientation to opportunities of a further research analyses.
According to the paper [2] a special technology of accomplishment of high-rise works is known to be as industrial and other facilities in case the working place is reached by means of rising or descending a man on a rope or with the help of other climbing methods of moving as industrial mountaineering climber. The main difference among the majority of the known professions is the absence of a support means. Specifications of industrial mountaineering are that the applied climbing equipment is used not only for moving to a workplace, but for protection against falling, and for the purpose of accomplishing labor
transactions. Shop advertising orders are performed in a flexible suspension position when a working operation is done after achieving a workplace at height, when a person is hanging doing his job for considerable time with the help of safety equipment or using wooden sitting which is limited, remote sites, in case
of mobility and maneuverability [3-4]. The absence of the regulatory base, involves impossibility of providing safety requirements, labor protections and it is difficult to providing legal and social guarantees to workers, as special privileges and compensations.
STATE STANDARDS
COST P EH 363-2007 "Individual protection equipment from fall from height. Safety systems".
GOST P EH 355-2008 "Individual protection equipment from fall from height. Shock-absorbers".
GOST P EH 353-2-2007 "Individual protection equipment from fall from height of polzunkov type on the flexible anchor line. Part 2".
GOST P EH 358-2008 "Individual protection equipment from fall from height. Leashes and hoisting slings for deduction and positioning".
GOST P EH 362-2008 "Individual protection equipment from fall from height. Connecting elements".
GOST P EH 353-1-2008 "Individual protection equipment from fall from height of polzunkovy type on the tough anchor line. Part 1".
GOST P EH 361-2008 "Individual protection equipment from fall from height. Safety leashes".
GOST P 12 4.206-99 "SSBT. Individual protection equipment from fall from height. Test methods".
The regulating documents obligatory to
execution, applicable to works, carried out at height by method of industrial mountaineering
TECHNICAL REGULATION OF CI M OMS UNION
TR TC 019/2011
"About safety of individual protection equipment"
INTERINDUSTRY RULES
PM-012-2000 SWEAT "Interindustry rules on labor protection during the work at height".
The rules on labor protection during the work at height approved by the order from 3/28/2014, No. 155H
The rules on labor protection during the work at height approved by the order from 6/17/2015, No. 383H
The rules on labor protection in construction approved by the order from 6/1/2015, No. 336H
Figure 2 - The regulating documents recommended for execution applicable to works, carried out at height by
method of industrial mountaineering
The documents regulating various extent of work at height can be subjected to the following gradation: state standards in individual protection equipment, in case of accomplishing high-rise works; cross-industry rules in labor protection; instructions for labor protection; The Technical regulation of the Customs union, etc., provided in the figure 1. In addition, it should be noted that regulating documents have status of obligatory and can be recommended documents for application (Figure 1, 2).
Safe engineering and labor protection are key questions in industrial mountaineering. Having studied special literature and works of scientists [5-8], we also have analyzed the conditions of industrial traumatism when accomplishing works at height it is possible to conclude that a third of accidents as a total quantity of incidents, including death, are usually occurred due to falling from high-rise works [9]. High level of injury rates during the work at height are not registered due to the lack of the regulatory basis and it concerns a problem of workers' safety in methods of industrial mountaineering. At least the main problem is the ways of creating comfortable conditions performing work-
ing climbers at height so it must be provided with using corresponding equipment and special clothes [10] which are important.
When carrying out works with the help of industrial mountaineering method we need to refer to the Cross-industry rules PM-012-2000 [11] SWEAT and Rules on labor protection as the works at height are approved by the order No. 155H of 28.03.2014 (in edition of the Order of Ministry of Labor of Russia of 17.06.2015, No. 383H) [12].
Let us consider basic provisions of accomplishing such works according to new Rules on labor protection doing the work at height (in edition of the Order of Ministry of Labor of Russia of 17.06.2015, No. 383H). Criteria of working conditions, are the most suitable for industrial mountaineering marked in the gray color in the figure 3.
Paying attention to the considered figure 3, and as it follows from the analysis [13,14] that industrial mountaineering activities are conducted in a flexible suspension position without paving a point of support using climbing methods as insurance and ropes system. It is also established that in case of being in safe-
ty equipment worker's legs can slip connected with squeezing by their hip straps of safety equipment. It negatively influences not only the conditions of per-
forming works, but also negatively affects the health state of workers [10].
Basic provisions when performing high-rise works
31
Ak
The risks connected with work at height
л
sg
I a
о
<D О
iS £
<D
53
СЛ СЛ
О
a
si
T3
<u
0
<D <D
S ^н
1 a
» I
^ Я
СЛ та
• e a S «>
л
ад
I й
о %
■3
(D (D
о
X (D
<а сл
'Й £
й о
(D *
О
iS £
н
□Е
л л
(D ТЗ
И
о
с
<D
cd й о
■й
ад
I й
о %
<D <D О
<D
а „
(D о - £
о г-
(D ТЗ
- (D
И ад
Я
H
■й
ад
I а
о
(D *
t *
ï> <U
« CS
S si
ад я !
^ О
1! 1 > тз тз S
<u cd о о
« ja
Я
О О
о сз
M •й
£ н
Performance of works depending on conditions of production is possible
Ж
ÊP
1 a л
S
I
V
ÊP
1 a
и ^
о о a
й
Groups of workers at work at height share:
3Ï
a
л
<D
0
iS
1
a s
s
M
й g
р
g g>
-S
сл g
1
а s
2 -а «л g
гч .й
•а
1 л
О
сл
О
<d
53
СЛ ГТ 1
S3 W
о со
а w
и ^
р й
«
«
0
£
1
а
2 *
S- (D
M <Н W g
О
<D
а
Systems of safety at height
m
я £
н
Я •a о
сл О а сл а о
О сл а (D сл fr it
сл ^ СО
<D Й О
сл
Й О
<D
té
а й о
и Л
^ >
со Б
Systems of safety consist from
-0- -0- -a:
(D
о
(D ТЗ
m
•с
я
<
£
сл
л
(D
Й О
О
ц
а
(D ТЗ
jga
о £ D Î?
й ^
H m
rÂe figure 3 - Basic provisions when working at height, it agrees [12]
For creating favorable and safe conditions for such- workers based on method of industrial mountaineering with safety equipment and special clothes as individual protection equipment (IPE) are supposed to determine.
On IPE in "Rules ..." there is a specific item (item 95) that points out that the employer must provide regular check of serviceability of safety systems for workers operating at height according to instructions in their operational documentation, but dynamic and static testing data of IPE about cases of falling people from height with the loadings are not carried
out. It means that the requirement to testing a static load safety belts may not be obligatory observed.
Having considered the existing state standard specifications on IPE, and also using data from the figure 3 it is possible to come to the conclusion, that the most optimum means during the work at height as method of industrial mountaineering are the means specified in Rules on labor protection during the work at height, approved by the order No. 155H of 28. 03. 2014 (in edition of the Order of Ministry of Labor of Russia of 17. 06. 2015, No. 383H) that states the safety systems, must be based on the leashes with shoulder straps highlighted in the color in table 1 act.
Wschodnioeuropejskie Czasopismo Naukowe (East European Scientific Journal) #14, 2016 _Systems of safety of works at height [12]_
Table 1
Name of system of safety
Graphic scheme of system of _safety_
The explanation to the graphic scheme
1
2
3
The holding system
1 - the holding leash (a belt safety strapless) covering a trunk of the person and consisting of separate details.
2 - the opening device (carbine) for connection of components.
3 - anchor point of fastening.
4 - the sling of adjustable length which is in the tense state for deduction of the worker.
5 - height difference more than 1,8 m.
The system of positioning allowing the worker to work with support with which falling is prevented
1 - a zone belt for support of a body which covers a body for a waist;
2 - the sling of adjustable length which is in the tense state for working positioning.
3 - a sling with the shock-absorber.
4 - safety leash.
The worker when using system of positioning has to be always attached to safety system._
The safety system consisting of the safety leash and a subsystem attached for an insurance
1 - a structural anchor on each end of the anchor line;
2 - the anchor line from a flexible rope or a cable between structural anchors to which it is possible to fix individual protection equipment;
3 - sling;
4 - shock-absorber;
5 - safety leash (belt safety straps)
The system of rescue and evacuation using means of protection of the involving type with the built-in winch
1 - anchor rigid line,
2 - means of protection of the involving type with the built-in winch;
3 - the saving leash including straps, a fitting, buckles or other elements;
4 - sling;
5 - shock-absorber;
6 - safety leash.
The considered rules on labor protection must have advisory character, but at the same time are obligatory to executing. At the entities, internal instructions on HSE can be developed and be applied. It is widespread everywhere, but a problem is that an essence of these rules sometimes are rather strongly to be separated from each other as there are no high standards and rules to make them uniform as act serv-
ing as a reference point for developing regulating documents.
Conclusion. As it follows from the carried- analysis the regulation on safety conditions and labor protection of industrial climbers are insufficiently regulated by standard legislative documents. The choice of necessary regulating documents, for ensuring working
y
process, is complicated ones due to the most documents are approximate in the fact and in content.
It is possible to conclude that industrial climber is not safe protected job ensured by legislative level as a certain subject. Therefore, for further developing safety conditions for hazardous occupation as industrial mountaineering, it is necessary to ensure safety at national level through adopting the documents regulating:
• labor protection and safety of works in case of doing them as method of industrial mountaineering in the same conditions without support;
• level of staff training having obligatory licensing of training centers for this type of activities;
• Creating comfortable conditions which are provided with usage of the corresponding equipment and special clothes;
• the separate class of special protective clothes, individual protection materials appropriate for industrial mountaineering workers;
• time of carrying out various works at height and complexity under various weather conditions without damage for health, preventing occupational diseases of industrial climbers;
• providing special privileges, compensations, medical insurance taking into account weight and degree of worker's damage .
THE USED SOURCES:
1. The resolution of Ministry of Labor of the Russian Federation of May 17, 2001 No. 40 "About entering of addition into the Single tariff job evaluation catalog of works and professions of workers, release 1".
2. Provisional rules of safety in industrial mountaineering. Are approved at a meeting of the Interdepartmental commission on certification abnormally -rescue forming, rescuers and educational institutions on their preparation. The protocol No. 2 of June 09, 2001. 179 Rescue center of Emercom of Russia.
3. Sopelnikova, N. G. Study and development of initial information when designing means of individual protection / N. G. Sopelnikova, E. E. Rudenko, N. L. Ushakov//Young scientists - to development of textile and light industry: interuniversity sb.nauch.trud. Ch.2. SEARCH - 2004. - Ivanovo: IGTA, 2004.
4. Beytuganov, M. G. Study and development of remedies of the building constructions working from fall from height in case of installation: synopsis. yew ....candidate. technical sciences / M. G. Beytuganov. -M, 1982.
5. Fil, E.S. Regulatory base of industrial mountaineering / Construction-2014. Problems and prospects of development of modern engineering-ecological systems / E.S. Fil//Materials of the international scientific and practical conference. - Rostov-on-Don, 2014, - S. - 56-58.
6. Sopelnikova, N. G. Labor safety in industrial mountaineering / N. G. Sopelnikova, E. E. Rudenko, Yu. E. Chertov//Labor safety in the industry//N. G. Sopelnikova, E. E. Rudenko, Yu. E. Chertov. - Labor safety in the industry. - 2008. No. 2. - Page 25-27.
7. Mikhaylova, M. S. Prospects and problems of development of industrial mountaineering in Russia / M. S. Mikhaylova, M. N. Pereverzev//- the Bulletin of the international academy of industrial mountaineering in Russia. - 2008. T 11. - No. 2. - Page 27-31.
8. Stupakov, A. A. Organization, the equipment and safety of high-rise works in a construction and operation of high rise buildings and constructions / A. A. Stupakov//Mechanization of a construction. - 2013. No. 12 (834). Page 45-48.
9. Sopelnikova, N. G. K to a problem of safe engineering of steeplejack and high-rise works / N. G. Sopelnikova, E. E. Rudenko, Yu. V. Kobzar//Clothing industry. - 2005. No. 3. Page 31-32.
10. Sopelnikova, N. G. Study and development of a protective suit for performance of works by methods of industrial mountaineering based on biomechanical characteristics of the person: yew.... Cand.Tech.Sci.: 05.19.04. Shakhty: RGB, 2007.
11. MPOT RM 012-2000. Cross-industry rules on labor protection during the works at height. The Resolution of October 04, 2000 No. 68 is approved by the Ministry of Labour and social development of the Russian Federation.
12. The rules on labor protection during the work at height approved by the order No. 155H from 28.3.2014 of g (in edition of the Order of Ministry of Labor of Russia of 17.06.2015 No. 383H).
13. Sopelnikova, N. G. K to a question of use of safety systems when carrying out a wrecking / N. G. Sopelnikova//the Construction in coastal areas: material of the 2nd scientific and practical conference; under the prof. K. N. Makarov / M-in formations of the Russian Federation, - Sochi: RIO SGUTIKD, 2003. -Page 99-101.
14. Martynov, A. I. Promalp (industrial mountaineering) / A. I. Martynov. - M.: TVT Division, 2004 - 272 pages.
