CC BY
5
УДК 371.311
Avdeeva A.N., candidate of technical sciences, associate professor
associate professor
Department of Materials Science and Mechanical Engineering
Tashkent State Transport University Uzbekistan, Tashkent Ablyalimov O.S., candidate of technical sciences
professor
Department "Locomotives and locomotive economy" Tashkent State Transport University Uzbekistan, Tashkent Tursunov N.K., candidate of technical sciences
associate professor "Materials Science and Mechanical Engineering" Tashkent State Transport University Uzbekistan, Tashkent Tursunov Sh.E. senior lecturer
Department of Materials Science and Mechanical Engineering
Tashkent State Transport University Uzbekistan, Tashkent Erkinov S.M. assistant
Tashkent State Technical University named after Islam Karimov
Uzbekistan, Tashkent
SHARING FRONT, COLLECTIVE AND INDIVIDUAL WORK AT PRACTICAL CLASSES ON THE DISCIPLINE "METROLOGY AND
STANDARDIZATION"
Abstract: the authors of the article considered various forms of organization of classroom work in the discipline "Metrology and standardization": frontal, individual, collective and combined. The article provides specific examples of the joint and phased use of the considered forms of education. It is concluded that individual collective and frontal work activates the learning process, and makes it not only interactive, but also improves learning.
Key words: collective form of work, frontal form of work, individual form of work, self-learning group, collective form of work, interactive learning.
In the Republic of Uzbekistan, a clear concept for the development of the higher education system has been developed, according to which a "phased transition from education, the curricula of which are aimed at obtaining
theoretical knowledge, to an education system aimed at developing practical skills" is necessary [1].
Indeed, it is very difficult to overestimate the importance of practical work. Lichtenberg G.K., a German philosopher, wrote: "A person cannot be taught anything. He has to learn everything himself' [2].
Modern, innovative forms of organization of practical classes are collective work. The founder of the theory of "collective way of learning" V. K. Dyachenko, identified four main forms: individual, pair, group and collective, from which, like bricks, fundamentally different things can be built [3]. Let's consider the joint use of individual and frontal forms.
The frontal form of learning requires the teacher to be able to manage the learning process of the entire audience, when all students are working on the same task. The effectiveness of the frontal form of work directly depends on the competence of the teacher, his ability to keep the entire audience in his field of vision. The result of frontal work increases if the lecturer creates a favorable atmosphere of creativity. The frontal form of work can be used in any classroom lesson. But since the frontal work is focused on the average level of knowledge of students, practical work must necessarily be supplemented by group and individual work.
The main weapon of a teacher of a technical university in practical classes is problem solving. On the basis of the theoretical material covered, received at the lecture, the teacher selects the number of individual examples necessary for the group. When choosing tasks, it is preferable to use a differentiated approach, forming at least three levels of difficulty: high, medium and low. Differentiation of students is not a discrimination of their potential, rather, it is a deeper process of individualization of learning.
Most often, students use the "template" method of completing assignments, therefore, to activate the audience, the teacher should solve the first example himself, using the "problem" method [4], or the "question and answer method" [5], organizing the front view of the work. In carrying out his task, the student develops the skills of independent understanding and critical thinking, analysis and synthesis, reflection and responsibility for decision-making. But so, he can work outside the classroom, without the control of the teacher, coming only for consultations. The task of a professional is to organize "mutual learning", the so-called "self-learning", in Dyachenko's terminology, a group.
You can start small - place the task on a presentation slide so that everyone can see all the options at the same time - this saves classroom time and creates a trusting contact, as one of the components of interactivity.
The second step is to invite those who wish to solve the example on the board, but at the same time, call only those who can definitely cope. If there are no worthy students among those who wish, then, using manipulations [6], force them. The third step is to invite the entire audience to monitor the progress of
the decision, with accompanying comments. The effect of collectivization can be accelerated by calling two or three participants at once to the board.
As teaching experience shows, when trying to find an error in the solution on the board, the whole group is included in a single, according to the definition of V.K. Dyachenko, the collective process of "mutual learning", when "everyone teaches everyone, and everyone teaches everyone."
Thus, individual work moves to the frontal and turns into a "collective" one, with the realization that "the more I teach others, the more and better I know myself" [3]. The "self-educational" process, not only does not exclude the control of the teacher - it requires highly qualified pedagogical knowledge, skills and abilities.
References:
1. «Концепция развития системы высшего образования Республики Узбекистан до 2030 года» опубликована на сайте УзА. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://kun.uz/ru/news/2019/10/09/shavkat-mirziyoyev-utverdilkonsepsiyu-razvitiya-sistemy-vysshego-obrazovaniya-do-2030-goda
2. Цитаты известных личностей. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https ://ru.citaty.net/avtory/georg-kristof-likhtenberg/
3. Дьяченко В.К. Сотрудничество в обучении: О коллективном способе учебной работы. -М.: Просвещение, 1991. -191 c.
4. Авдеева Анна Николаевна Принципы построения и проведения интерактивной лекции // Вестник науки и образования. 2020. №8-1 (86). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsipy-postroeniya-i-provedeniyainteraktivnoy-lektsii(дата обращения: 26.10.2021).
5. Авдеева Анна Николаевна НЕКОТОРЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ МЕТОДА ПОСТАНОВКИ ВОПРОСОВ И ОТВЕТОВ ПРИ ПРОВЕДЕНИИ АУДИТОРНЫХ ЗАНЯТИЙ // Вестник науки и образования. 2020. №20-2 (98). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n7nekotorye-aspekty-metodapostanovki-voprosov-i-otvetov-pri-provedenii-auditornyh-zanyatiy(дата обращения: 26.10.2021).
6. Avdeeva Anna Nikolaevna DISPUTED KINDS OF INFLUENCE IN THE PROCESS OF LEARNING AT THE UNIVERSITY // EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR). - 2020. - Volume: 6 Issue: 10 October. - P. 496 - 498.
7. Турсунов Н. К. и др. Метрология и стандартизация: роль и место дисциплины в подготовке специалистов железнодорожного транспорта республики узбекистан //Academic research in educational sciences. - 2022. -Т. 3. - №. TSTU Conference 1. - С. 140-145.
8. Авдеева А. Н. Взаимодействие с проблемными студентами в процессе аудиторного обучения //НАУЧНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ И РАЗРАБОТКИ 2020 ГОДА. - 2020. - С. 57-60.
9. Nikolayevna A. A. et al. EXTRA-CURRICULUM STUDENTS'INDEPENDENT TASKS ON THE DISCIPLINE"
METROLOGY" //Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal. -2022. - T. 3. - №. 6. - C. 147-151.
10. Avdeeva A. N., Filimonova L. Y. Interdisciplinary binary lecture as a method of teaching at Technical University //ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. - 2021. - T. 11. - №. 4. - C. 1385-1389.
