CC BY
1REPROCESSING SIMULATION ELEMENTS IN THE RENDERING
SECTION FOR THE FUNDAMENTALS OF POWER SUPPLY Rakhmonov I.U.1, Kurbonova R.Sh.2, Shayumova Z.T.3, Ganiev Sh.R.4
1Rakhmonov Ikromjon Usmonovich - Doctor of Science (DSc), Head DEPARTMENT OF POWER SUPPLY, TASHKENT STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY,
TASHKENT,
Kurbonova Raykhona Shakhobiddin kizi - assistant
DEPARTMENT OF WESTERN LANGUAGE, TASHKENT ORIENTAL UNIVERSITY,
TASHKENT,
3Shayumova Zamira Tursunboyeva - Doctor of Philosophy in Technical Sciences (PhD),
assistant professor,
DEPARTMENT OF POWER SUPPLY, TASHKENT STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY,
TASHKENT, 4Ganiev Shahruz Rajabovich- Deputy Dean, BUKHARA INSTITUTE OF NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT NRU "TIIMSKH";
BUKHARA, REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Abstract: this study explores the enhancement of educational simulations in the "Fundamentals of Power Supply" course through advanced rendering techniques and pedagogical integration, aiming to improve engagement and understanding of electrical engineering concepts. A combined approach of literature review, tool evaluation, development of rendering techniques, and educational psychology underpins the research, focusing on user-centered design and iterative refinement with feedback from students and educators. Results show significant boosts in student engagement and comprehension, demonstrating the value of interactive simulations in connecting theory with practice. The paper underscores the need to marry technical improvements with educational goals and considers the expansion of these methods to other disciplines. It concludes by suggesting future research into emerging technologies like VR and AR to further elevate engineering education's quality and accessibility.
Keywords: simulation-based learning, electrical engineering education, visual fidelity, rendering techniques, pedagogical principles, interactive learning environments, user-centered design, iterative refinement.
The advancement of educational methodologies in engineering, particularly through the use of simulation-based learning environments, offers significant benefits in teaching complex concepts like those found in the "Fundamentals of Power Supply" course. These simulations, crucial for enhancing the practical skills and foundational knowledge of future electrical engineers, depend heavily on their visual and functional fidelity, which in turn is influenced by rendering techniques [1, 2]. High-quality rendering within these simulations is essential for accurately depicting electrical phenomena, enabling a more immersive and intuitive learning experience for students. This paper focuses on optimizing the rendering section of educational modules to improve both the engagement and comprehension of students in electrical engineering principles.
To enhance the educational value of simulation elements, our methodology integrates a comprehensive review of current simulation tools, feedback from educators and students, and the development of advanced rendering techniques. By focusing on improving visual fidelity and incorporating pedagogical principles, such as active learning and feedback loops, into the simulation design, we aim to create a more effective and interactive learning environment. Experimentation with rendering algorithms like ray tracing and rasterization, alongside usability testing, forms the backbone of our approach, ensuring that the simulations are both visually engaging and pedagogically aligned.
21
The reprocessing of simulation elements has led to notable improvements in the educational impact of simulations, making complex electrical engineering concepts more accessible and engaging for students. Technical advancements in rendering have enhanced the visual quality of simulations, while the integration of educational design principles has improved learning outcomes [3, 4]. This iterative process, informed by continuous feedback, highlights the importance of combining advanced rendering techniques with thoughtful pedagogical design to enhance the effectiveness of simulation-based learning tools in engineering education.
The flowchart outlines a structured process for rendering, beginning with the initial step labeled "Begin." The process diverges into two distinct paths: one for handling Markdown content and another for HTML content. For the Markdown path, the content may be passed through a Content Rendering Module (CRM), where it is determined whether specific features such as emojis, footnotes, and task lists need to be processed by their respective Emoji, Footnote, and Task List Rendering Modules (ERMs). This suggests a modular approach to processing different elements within the Markdown content. Meanwhile, HTML content bypasses the CRM and is directly processed by Media Player and PlantUML ERMs, implying that embedded media and UML diagrams are rendered here. After both paths process their respective content types, they converge at a "Result" step, indicating the completion of the rendering process and the production of fully formatted content [5, 6]. The process concludes at the "End" step, signifying that the content is now ready for display or further use, with all interactive and visual elements properly integrated. This flowchart depicts a comprehensive system designed to handle multiple content types and their unique rendering requirements, ensuring a rich and interactive user experience.
This study on enhancing simulation elements for an electrical engineering course underscores the effectiveness of user-centered design and iterative refinement based on usability feedback in educational technology. By integrating advanced rendering techniques with educational principles, the research has improved student engagement and understanding of complex concepts, showcasing the value of high-quality, interactive simulations in engineering education. The process has emphasized the importance of aligning technical enhancements with pedagogical goals, ensuring simulations are not just technologically superior but also educationally relevant.
The findings advocate for continuous collaboration between developers, educators, and learners to refine educational tools, with potential applications across various disciplines [7, 8, 9]. Future research directions include leveraging emerging technologies like virtual and augmented reality, promising to further transform educational simulations. Overall, this study contributes to the dialogue on educational technology, advocating for a blend of technical innovation and educational acumen to enrich learning experiences.
References
1. Kurbonov N.N., Rakhmonov I. U. Simulation of the power supply system using industrial 4.0 wireless tools // "Тинчуринские чтения - 2022 «энергетика и цифровая трансформация" Международная молодежная научная конференция. Казан, 27-29 апреля 2022 г. 14-17 с.
2. Rakhmonov I.U., Kurbonov N.N., Bijanov A.K. Types of simulators and their efficient architectures //Вестник науки и образования ISSN 2312-8089. № 9 (129). 2022 PP. 13-19.
3. Рахмонов И.У., Ушаков В.Я., Ниёзов Н.Н. Определение факторы, влияющие на потребления электроэнергии предприятиями машиностроения при прогнозирование // «Проблемы современной науки и образования» ISSN 24134635, № 8 (177), 2022. 19-24 с.
4. Matthews S., Uribe-Quevedo A., & Theodorou A. (2020). Rendering Optimizations for Virtual Reality Using Eye-Tracking. In 2020 22nd Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR 2020) (pp. 398-405). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SVR51698.2020.00066
5. Dai D., Shi X., Wang L., & Li X. (2022). Interactive Mixed Reality Rendering on Holographic Pyramid. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR 2022) (pp. 483-492). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR51125.2022.00068
6. Casado-Coscolla A., Sanchez-Belenguer C., Wolfart E., & Sequeira V. (2023). Rendering massive indoor point clouds in virtual reality. Virtual Reality, 27(3), 18591874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00766-3
7. Fink L., Hensel N., Markov-Vetter D., Weber C., Staadt O., & Stamminger M. (2019). Hybrid Mono-Stereo Rendering in Virtual Reality. In 2019 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (pp. 88-96). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/vr.2019.8798283
8. Fukuda T., Novak M., Fujii H., & Pencreach Y. (2021). Virtual reality rendering methods for training deep learning, analysing landscapes, and preventing virtual reality sickness. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 19(2), 190-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077120957544
9. Kalarat K., & Koomhin P. (2019). Real-Time Volume Rendering Interaction in Virtual Reality. International Journal of Technology, 10(7), 1307-1314. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i7.3259
