Научная статья на тему 'Heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelid heliozoa from littoral and supralittoral zones of the Black Sea (the Southern part of the Crimea)'

Heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelid heliozoa from littoral and supralittoral zones of the Black Sea (the Southern part of the Crimea) Текст научной статьи по специальности «Биологические науки»

CC BY
312
50
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Журнал
Protistology
Область наук
Ключевые слова
heterotrophic flagellates / centrohelid heliozoa / protists / species diversity / morphology / Black Sea / Crimea

Аннотация научной статьи по биологическим наукам, автор научной работы — Kristina I. Prokina, Anton A. Mylnikov, Alexander P. Mylnikov

Species composition and morphology of heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelid heliozoa in littoral and supralittoral zones of the Black Sea in the Southern part of the Crimea were studied. Overall, 68 species of heterotrophic flagellates and 2 species of centrohelids were encountered in this survey, of which 44 species are the first records for the Black Sea. Many species are widespread and known not only from marine but also from freshwater and soil habitats. Most observed species feed on bacteria, 14 species consume other protists (heterotrophic flagellates, algae, and naked amoebae). Micrographs and morphological descriptions of 20 species (Multicilia marina, Salpingoeca abyssalis, Salpingoeca infusionum, Stephanoeca diplocostata, Paraphysomonas cylicophora, Clathromonas butcheri, Protaspa tegere, Protaspa verrucosa, Helkesimastix marina, Heteronema ovale, Petalomonas labrum, Gweamonas unicus, Pendulomonas adriperis, Platychilomonas psammobia, Zoelucasa sablensis, Planomonas cephalopora, Planomonas melba, Amastigomonas muscula, Choanocystis aff. minima, Raineriophrys raineri) are given.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelid heliozoa from littoral and supralittoral zones of the Black Sea (the Southern part of the Crimea)»

Protistology 11 (3), 143-169 (2017)

Protistology

Heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelid heliozoa from littoral and supralittoral zones of the Black Sea (the Southern part of the Crimea)

Kristina I. Prokina, Anton A. Mylnikov and Alexander P. Mylnikov

Papanin Institute for Biology ofInland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Russia

| Submitted September 26, 2017 | Accepted October 10, 2017 |

Summary

Species composition and morphology of heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelid heliozoa in littoral and supralittoral zones of the Black Sea in the Southern part of the Crimea were studied. Overall, 68 species of heterotrophic flagellates and 2 species of centrohelids were encountered in this survey, of which 44 species are the first records for the Black Sea. Many species are widespread and known not only from marine but also from freshwater and soil habitats. Most observed species feed on bacteria, 14 species consume other protists (heterotrophic flagellates, algae, and naked amoebae). Micrographs and morphological descriptions of 20 species (Multicilia marina, Salpingoeca abyssalis, Salpingoeca infusionum, Stephanoeca diplocostata, Paraphysomonas cylicophora, Clathromonas butcheri, Protaspa tegere, Protaspa verrucosa, Helkesimastix marina, Heteronema ovale, Petalomonas labrum, Gweamonas unicus, Pendulomonas adriperis, Platychilomonas psammobia, Zoelucasa sablensis, Planomonas cephalopora, Planomonas melba, Amastigomonas muscula, Choanocystis aff. minima, Raineriophrys raineri) are given.

Key words: heterotrophic flagellates, centrohelid heliozoa, protists, species diversity, morphology, Black Sea, Crimea

Introduction

Heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelid heliozoa play an important role in the microbial food web, which transforms a significant part of carbon and other nutrients in water ecosystems (Pomeroy, 1974; Sherr et al., 1982; Porter et al., 1985; Stensdotter-Blomberg, 1998; Arndt et al., 2000). Precise identification of species is essential for ecological researches and their reliability. Most

species of heterotrophic flagellates were described in late XIX and early XX centuries and need to be revised. Intense investigations of centrohelid heliozoans began only in the recent 30-40 years with the development of electron microscopy methods, and they are still in progress. These groups of protozoans remain the least studied components of aquatic ecosystems and precise morphological and ecological investigations using modern methods of light and electron microscopy are required.

doi:10.21685/1680-0826-2017-11-3-2 © 2017 The Author(s)

Protistology © 2017 Protozoological Society Affiliated with RAS

In particular, very little is known about distribution of heterotrophic flagellates and heliozoans. Biogeography of protists is subject to lively debate but many questions are still unresolved. Current investigations show, that most morphospecies of free-living heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelids are cosmopolites (Azovsky et al., 2016; Leonov, 2012; Lee, 2015) and their distribution depends mostly on the type of habitats, rather than on geographic location (Finlay, 1998; Finlay et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 1998, 2000; Al-Qassab et al. 2002). But these results could be strongly affected by such factors as underestimation of cryptic diversity, misidentifications, under-sampling and under-exploration of some regions (Azovsky et al., 2016).

Particularly, the diversity of heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelid heliozoans of the Black Sea is poorly studied and reports on their observations are limited to a few papers (Ostroumov, 1917; Valkanov, 1940, 1970; Moiseev, 1980; Mikrjukov and Mylnikov, 1998; Mikrjukov, 1999; Leonov, 2010; Tikhonenkov, 2006). The aims of our study were to identify species composition and investigate details of the morphology of heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelids from the Black Sea (the Southern part of the Crimea) by methods of light and electron microscopy.

Material and methods

Benthic and periphytonic samples were collected from littoral and supralittoral zones ofthe Black Sea near Sevastopol (the Crimea peninsula) by Ilya S. Turbanov in May 8—17, 2017. The bays Kazachya (14 samples), Solenaya (2 samples), Kamyshovaya (1sample), Karantinnaya (3 samples), Kruglaya (3 samples) and Streletskaya (2 samples) were investigated. Water samples with bottom detritus or scrapings ofperiphyton were placed in 15-ml plastic tubes and transported to a laboratory at 4 °C. In the laboratory, samples were transferred into Petri dishes and enriched with a suspension of Pseudomonas fluorescens Migula bacteria for bacterivorous flagellate growth as well as by Procryptobia sorokini (Zhukov, 1975) Frolov et al., 2001 cell culture for heliozoan and predatory flagellate development. Organisms were cultured in Petri dishes at 22 °C in darkness and observed for 10 days to identify the cryptic species diversity. The light microscope AxioScope A1 (Carl Zeiss, Germany) with DIC and phase contrasts and water immersion objectives (to-

tal magnification 1120 x) was used for observations of living cells. Videorecording was made by the analog AVT HORN MC1009/S video camera. Electron microscopy preparations for studying protists with external cell elements were carried out according to the described methods (Moestrup and Thomsen, 1980; Mikrjukov, 2002). Organisms were observed in transmission (JEM-1011) and scanning (Joel JSM-6510 LV) electron microscopes. Dendrogram of similarity ofwater bodies by species composition was drawn on the basis of the Bray-Curtis similarity index using the single linkage algorithm in the PAST software package.

Results

Descriptions of the sampling sites are listed in Table 1. Water temperature during the collection period varied within 16—20 °C, salinity ranged 16—18%c.

In total, 68 species and forms of heterotrophic flagellates and 2 species of centrohelids from four eukaryotic supergroups (Amoebozoa, Opisthokonta, SAR, and Excavata) were revealed. Eight species were identified only to genus level and eighteen species were of uncertain systematic position. Complete list of observed heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelids with descriptions of the morphology of 20 species is presented below. The current macrosystem of eukaryotes (Adl et al., 2012) was used; asterisks indicate ranks of taxa.

AMOEBOZOA Lühe, 1913 emend. Cavalier-Smith, 1998

*Multicilia Cienkowsky, 1881

Multicilia marina Cienkowsky, 1881 [syn.: Polymastix sol Gruber, 1884; Tetraciliaparadoxa Valkanov, 1970] (Fig. 1 a-d).

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Ka-rantinnaya (samples 6-8, 12, 16, and 20).

Cell body is roundish, rarely oblong or irregular with slight swelling at the base of each flagellum. Diameter of the cell body is 3-15 ^m. Unusually thick flagella are 1.5-3.5 times as long as the cell body, evenly distributed over the surface ofthe body and their number varies from 2 to 30. Flagella make very weak, slow, irregular movements without visible coordination. Small granules and large vacuoles are present in the cytoplasm. Round nucleus located medially. Several cell forms (stages of cell development) with different size and shape of the

Table 1. Characteristics of sample collection sites.

Sample # Date Characteristics of samples Distance from waterfront, m Depth, m Number of species

Bay Kazachya, 44034'18.8''N 33024'40.2''E

1 08.05 Littoral, scraping from a single stone 2 2 16

2 08.05 Littoral, sand 0.5 0.1 6

3 08.05 Littoral, sand 1.5 0.5 8

4 08.05 Littoral, scraping from the rock 1 0.2 15

5 08.05 Supralittoral, storm emissions at the waterfront - - 4

б 08.05 Littoral, scraping from the base of the metal pier 3 1.5 22

7 11.05 Littoral, sand and sludge 0.5 0.1 7

8 11.05 Littoral, among thickets of Phragmites australis 0.3 0.2 15

9 11.05 Littoral, sand and sludge 2 0.2 11

10 14.05 Littoral, scraping from the Cystoseira barbata 2 0.5 10

11 14.05 Littoral, scraping from the Ulva sp. 1 0.2 5

12 14.05 Littoral, sand 20 0.5 15

13 14.05 Supralittoral, Native Miocene clays (waterfront) - - 1

14 14.05 Littoral, scraping from stones 3 0.3 5

Bay Solenaya, 44034'31.4''N 33024'13.8''E

15 10.05 Littoral, detritus among thickets of Phragmites australis 0.5 0.1 4

1б 10.05 Littoral, sludge 0.2 0.05 20

Bay Kamyshovaya, 44034'59.8''N 33025'27.1''E

17 10.05 Littoral, sand and sludge 0.1 0.05 5

Bay Karantinnaya, 44036'44.3''N 33029'58.1''E

18 13.05 Littoral, sand and sludge 0.2 0.05 16

19 13.05 Littoral, scraping from the Zostera marina 5 0.3 6

20 13.05 Littoral, sand and sludge 0.5 0.2 3

Bay Kruglaya, 44036'06.1''N 33026'41.4''E

21 17.05 Littoral, sand and sludge 0.5 0.5 16

22 17.05 Supralittoral, (waterfront) - - 7

23 17.05 Littoral, sludge 5 0.3 10

Bay Streletskaya, 44036'13.0''N 33028'09.5''E

24 17.05 Littoral, sand 0.5 0.2 5

25 17.05 Supralittoral, (waterfront) - - 2

cell body, size ofthe nucleus, and number offlagella were observed in the samples.

Biflagellar cells (fig. 1a) — elongate oval, its size is 3—6x1.5—3.0 ^m. Flagella insert from different "poles" of the cell and directed to opposite sides. Cells slowly gliding along the substrate toward the direction of one of the flagella. Direction of movement can abruptly change to the opposite without turning the cell, and the anterior end becomes the posterior one.

Cells with 5—7 flagella (Fig. 1 b) — roundish with pronounced swellings. Diameter of the cell body is 5—8 ^m. Movement of the cell is slightly faster than that of the biflagellar form. Provisional anterior

flagellum looks more direct compared with other flagella, and only its tip can slightly coil. Remaining flagella can slowly turn to different directions and smoothly squirm.

Multiflagellar cells (Fig. 1 c—d) — more roundish in comparison with other forms, 8—15 ^m in diameter, and with about 30 long flagella. Sometimes cells bear also short flagella (2—4 ^m long). Nucleus is well visible, 1.5—3.0 ^m in diameter.

Also tetraflagellar, giant multi-flagellar (with up to 200 flagella), branching or horseshoe-shaped forms, developing in culture after sharp salinity decrease, have been described (Mikrjukov and Mylnikov, 1998). Cells feed on small naked amoebae

Fig. 1. Light microscopy of heterotrophic flagellates (DIC): a-d - Multicilia marina (a - biflagellar cell, b -5-flagellar cell, c-d - multi-flagellar cells); e-g - Salpingoeca abyssalis; h-i - S. infusionum; j - Stephanoeca diplocostata; k-m - Protaspa tegere; n-o - P. verrucosa; p - Helkesimastix marina; q-t - Heteronema ovale (r - pellicular striation, s-t - metaboly). Scale bars: a-b, e-k, p - 5 ^m; c-d, l-o, q-t - 10 ^m.

and capture a prey by the ventral side of the body, remaining motionless for a short time, until food is absorbed (Nikolaev et al., 2006). Morphology of observed cells is in agreement with previous studies, but Mikrjukov and Mylnikov (1998) described larger cells (up to 40 ^m in diameter in culture), while the largest cells observed in our investigation were 15 ^m. This species is very easily distinguished from other flagellates because ofits unusual morphology. It differs from other freshwater species of the genus (M. lacustris Lauterborn, 1901 and M. palustris Penard, 1903) by the ability to live in marine habitats.

Previously reported from marine waters of USA (Jones, 1974), White Sea (Cienkowski, 1881; Mikrjukov and Mylnikov, 1998; Tikhonenkov, 2006), Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Mikrjukov and Mylnikov, 1998), Black Sea (Mikrjukov and Mylnikov, 1998; Tikhonenkov, 2006).

OPISTHOKONTA Cavalier-Smith, 1987 emend. Adl et al., 2005 *Holozoa Lang et al., 2002 **Choanomonada Kent, 1880 ***Craspedida Cavalier-Smith, 1997 emend. Nitsche et al., 2011

Codosiga botrytis (Ehrenberg, 1838) James-Clark, 1866 [bas.: Epistylis botrytis Ehrenberg, 1838].

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 8). See morphological descriptions by Vors (1992), Ekelund and Patterson (1997), and Shatilovich et al. (2010).

Previously reported from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); White Sea, Pechora Sea, Black Sea, South China Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006; Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017), Siberia (Shatilovich et al., 2010), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006), Tailand (Charubhun and Charubhun, 2000), Japan (Takamura et al., 2000), Australia (Lee et al., 2005); from soils of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov et al., 2010), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Australia (Ekelund and Patterson, 1997).

Salpingoeca abyssalis Nitsche et al., 2007 (Fig. 1 e-g).

Found in the bays Kazachya and Solenaya (samples 12 and 16).

Cell body oval, without neck, completely fills the transparent lorica; its size is 3-4x2.0-2.5 ^m.

Large collar well developed, the same length as the lorica or slightly longer (Fig. 1 e). Flagellum is about 2 lengths of the lorica. Stalk is of the same length as the lorica, developed on attached cells (Fig. 1 f). Floating forms, known for this species (Nitsche et al., 2007), were not observed.

Morphology of observed cells is in congruence with the first description from the Atlantic Ocean, from the depth of 5038 m (Nitsche et al., 2007). Species is similar to S. infusionum Kent, 1880. But lorica of S. infusionum narrows posteriorly and stalk is almost 1.2—2 times longer than the cell. S. abyssalis, unlike S. infusionum, occupies the whole space of the lorica. Also S. abyssalis is similar to S. marina James-Clark, 1867, but S. marina has narrowed anterior margin of the lorica, and the anterior end of the cell body has a neck. And conversely, expanded anterior margin of the lorica is typical for such species as S. inquillata Kent, 1880, S. curvipes Kent, 1880, S. ringens Kent, 1880, and S. eurystoma Stokes, 1886, which, possibly, are synonyms (Lee and Patterson, 2000).

Salpingoeca amphoridium James-Clark, 1868.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 7). See morphological descriptions by Vors (1992), Ekelund and Patterson (1997), and Prokina et al. (2017a).

Previously reported from marine waters of Australia (Lee, 2015); White Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Red Sea (Tikho-nenkov, 2009); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006; Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Germany (Auer and Arndt, 2001), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006), Ethiopia (Prokina et al., 2017a); from soils of China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Australia (Ekelund and Patterson, 1997).

Salpingoeca infusionum Kent, 1880 (Fig. 1 h—i).

Found in the bays Kazachya and Kruglaya (samples 7, 21, and 23).

Cell body is oval, 3—6 ^m in length, occupies 2/3 ofthe lorica; the basal part ofthe lorica is empty. Protoplasmatic outgrows emerge at the posterior end of the cell body and attached to the inner side of the lorica (Fig. 1 h). Lorica is 4—9 ^m in length, slightly tapers at the base, truncates anteriorly. Collar is equal to cell body length. Flagellum is 3 times longer than the lorica, stalk is 1.5—2 times longer than the lorica.

Morphology of observed cells corresponds to previous descriptions. However, some authors

described a shorter stalk (Lee and Patterson, 2000; Lee, 2002). Tong (1993) described very long flagellum (5—7 times longer than the cell body). On the contrary, Lee (2002) described very short flagellum, equal to cell body length. It is possible that a total length of flagella is difficult to estimate in living cells with light microscopy. Tong (1993) notes a spherical swelling at the base of the lorica, which we did not observe. Nevertheless, she mentioned that this morphological character was not observed in all cells and it was difficult to see in a light microscope. Some authors (Griessmann, 1913; Boucaud-Camou, 1967) consider S. infusionum as a synonym of S. marina, but we agree with Tong (1997a), that these organisms are different species; the main difference is a narrowing anterior margin of the lorica of S. marina, forming a short neck.

Previously reported from marine and brackish waters of the Northern Europe (Griessmann, 1913; Boucaud-Camou, 1967; Tong, 1993, 1997a), Korea (Lee, 2002), USA (Norris, 1965), Australia (Lee and Patterson, 2000; Lee et al., 2003), the Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997), White Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009).

Salpingoeca megacheila Ellis, 1929.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 1). See morphological descriptions by Tong et al. (1998) and Lee et al. (2003).

Previously reported from marine waters of Australia (Tong et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2015); White Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006); from soils of China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012).

***Acanthoecida Norris, 1965 emend. Cavalier-Smith, 1997 emend. Nitsche et al., 2011.

Stephanoeca diplocostata Ellis, 1930 (Figs 1 j, 3 a).

Found in the bays Kazachya, Kamyshovaya, Karantinnaya, and Kruglaya (samples 6—7, 17, 19, and 21).

Cell body is oval, narrowed posteriorly and truncated anteriorly. Size of the cell body is 4—6 x3.5—4 ^m. Collar size is equal to cell body length. Lorica subdivided into a narrowed proximal part (with the cell body) and distal extended part (with the collar). Length of the lorica is 11 — 16 ^m, breadth of widened part is 6.5—8 ^m. Cell attached to the substrate with stalk. Lorica has longitudinal

and transverse costae, visible in a light microscope. However, for a precise species identification electron microscopy was used. On the TEM micrographs, 13—18 longitudinal and 4—5 transverse costae are visible. Transverse costae arranged in pairs in extended part of the lorica (Fig. 3 a).

Morphology of observed cells is similar to previous descriptions. However, Thomsen et al. (1991) noted a longer lorica — up to 20 ^m in length. Some authors described different numbers of costae: 18 longitudinal and 2 transverse (Thomsen et al., 1991); 10—13 longitudinal and 7 transverse (Leadbeater, 1973); 16—20 longitudinal and 5 transverse (Soto-Liebe et al., 2007). Leadbeater (1979) showed that number of costae and development of the stalk depend on a phase of the life cycle. Size of the cell body increases closer to the interphase, shape of the protoplast varies from round to almost rectangular. Flagellum may disappear during the division. This species is similar to S. pedicellata Leadbeater, 1972. The main difference is an arrangement of transverse costae of S. diplocostata in pairs. Both species differ from others in genus Stephanoeca by shape of the lorica and an arrangement of the costae.

Previously reported from marine waters of Yugoslavia (Leadbeater, 1973), USA (Thomsen et al., 1991), Chile (Soto-Liebe et al., 2007), Hawaii (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Tong, 1997c; Lee and Patterson, 2000); White Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992; Ikàvalko, 1998), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009); from brackish waters of Eastern Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002).

Stephanoeca sp.

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Karantinnaya (sample 6—9, 16, and 18).

SAR

*Stramenopiles Patterson, 1989 emend. Adl et al., 2005

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

**Bicosoecida Grasse, 1926 emend. Karpov, 1998

Bicosoeca gracilipes James-Clark, 1867.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 8). See morphological descriptions by Tong (1997b), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), Lee et al. (2003), and Lee (2007).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Australia (Tong et al., 1998; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2007, 2015).

Bicosoeca maris Picken, 1841 [syn.: Bicosoeca griessmanni (Griessmann, 1914) Bourrelly, 1951].

Found in the bay Karantinnaya (sample 18). See morphological descriptions by Tong (1997b), Tong et al. (1998), and Lee et al. (2003).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b) and Australia (Tong et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2003); from brackish waters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006).

Caecitellus parvulus (Griessmann, 1913) Patterson et al., 1993 [bas.: Bodo parvulus Griessmann, 1913]

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Kruglaya (samples 10—11, 16, and 23). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), Lee et al. (2003), and Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from marine waters of Denmark (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), U.K. (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Tong, 1993, 1997b), Greenland (Vors, 1993a), Belize (Vors, 1993b), Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong, 1997c; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2007, 2015); White Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Mediterranean Sea (Arndt et al., 2003), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Patterson et al., 1993), equatorial Pacific Ocean (Vors et al., 1995); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002).

Cafeteria marsupialis Larsen et Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bays Kazachya, Kruglaya, and Streletskaya (samples 12, 21—23, and 25). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Ekebom et al. (1995), Tong (1997b), Lee and Patterson (2000), and Lee et al. (2003).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006); White Sea, Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); from freshwaters of Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006).

Cafeteria roenbergensis Fenchel et Patterson, 1988.

Found in all observed bays, except the bay

Kruglaya (samples 1-6, 8, 10-12, 14-17, 19, and 24-25). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Ekebom et al. (1995), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), Lee et al. (2003), and Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Greenland (Vors, 1993a), Korea (Lee, 2002), Belize, Tenerife (Vors, 1993b), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong, 1997c; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015), Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997); White Sea, Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Kara Sea (Tikhonenkov et al., 2015), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Mediterranean Sea (Arndt et al., 2003), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); from freshwaters of Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006).

**Chrysophyceae Pascher, 1914

Paraphysomonas cylicophora Leadbeater, 1972 (Fig. 3 b-d).

Found in the bay Karantinnaya (sample 19).

Cell body is covered by one type of siliceous scales. Scales have round plate base 0.7-0.9 ^m in diameter, with radial, some times bifurcate ribs. Perforated cup with a dense marginal rim located on a small thick neck (0.12-0.15 ^m in diameter) in the center of the base.

This species is easily identifiable by the peculiar form of siliceous scales, which can be visible only with electron microscope. Size and shape of scales agree well with previous descriptions (Tong et al., 1997; 1998).

Previously reported from marine waters of Norway (Leadbeater, 1972), Australia (Tong et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2003), Antarctica (Tong et al., 1997); Baltic Sea (Thomsen, 1975; Vors, 1992).

Clathromonas butcheri (Pennick et Clarke, 1972). Scoble et Cavalier-Smith, 2014 [bas.: Paraphy-somonas butcheri Pennick et Clarke, 1972; syn.: Paraphysomonas inconspicula Takahashi, 1976] (Fig. 3 e-h).

Found in the bays Kazachya, Karantinnaya, and Kruglaya (samples 3, 19, and 21).

Cell body is covered by two types of siliceous scales. The first type - round or oval plate mesh scales (Fig. 3 g) with 12-16 hollows at the first

(external) row, 7—11 holes at the second (inner) row, and irregular holes at the center part ofthe scale. Size of plate mesh scales is 0.4—0.9x0.4—0.7 ^m. The second type of scales — crown-scales (Fig. 3 h) with 5 columns and 5 oval holes between them. Anterior end of crown-scales is reticulate with small holes. Diameter of the second type of scales is 0.5—0.7 ^m.

This species was originally described as Para-physomonas butcheri, however, after phylogenetic studies, Scoble and Cavalier-Smith (2014) transferred it to a new genus Clathromonas. Number of holes and sizes of scales may vary at different cells (Bergesch et al., 2008). Size of scales of observed cells corresponds to previous descriptions (Tong et al., 1998; Scoble and Cavalier-Smith, 2014). However, Scoble and Cavalier-Smith (2014) pointed out that crown-scales can be observed with both five and six columns. Some species of the genus Clathromonas (C. caroni Scoble et Cavalier-Smith, 2014; C. cribosa (Lukas, 1968) Scoble et Cavalier-Smith, 2014; C. homolepis (Preisig et Hibberd, 1882) Scoble et Cavalier-Smith, 2014; C. tongi Scoble et Cavalier-Smith, 2014) have similar plate mesh scales. Therefore, identification of the species by observation of several scales is impossible. C. butcheri differs from C. cribosa and C. homolepis by shape of crown-scales. Studied organism differs from C. caroni and C. tongi by the size of scales and the number of hollows. C. tongi have fewer number of hollows in plate mesh scales (5—9 at the external row, 2—6 at the inner row), and is characterized by angular shape of hollows of crown-scales. C. caroni has larger size of scales of both type and shorter columns of crown-scales.

Previously reported from marine waters of Brazil (Bergesch et al., 2008), U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Australia (Tong et al., 1998), USA (Scoble and Cavalier-Smith, 2014), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992); from freshwaters of Great Britain (Preisig and Hibberd, 1982).

**Dictyochophyceae Silva, 1980 ***Pedinellales Zimmermann et al., 1984

Actinomonas mirabilis Kent, 1880 [syn.: Actino-monas marina Kufferath, 1952; Actinomonas pusilla Kent, 1880; Actinomonas radiosa Roskin, 1981; Pteridomonas scherffelii Lemmermann, 1914].

Found in the bays Kazachya and Karantinnaya (samples 1, 3, 8, and 18). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990) and Tong (1997b).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Korea (Lee, 2002), Australia (Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2015), Fiji, Hawaii, Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997); White Sea, Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017), Germany (Auer and Arndt, 2001), Japan (Takamura et al., 2000).

Pteridomonas danica Patterson et Fenchel, 1985. Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Kruglaya (samples 3—4, 6, 16, and 21). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Patterson and Simpson (1996), and Tong (1997b, 1997c).

Previously reported from marine waters of Denmark, Baltic Sea (Patterson and Fenchel, 1985), U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong, 1997c; Tong et al., 1998; Lee, 2007, 2015), Fiji, Hawaii, Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990); White Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Kara Sea (Tikhonenkov et al., 2015), equatorial Pacific Ocean (Vors et al., 1995); freshwaters of Germany (Auer and Arndt, 2001), Brazil (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006).

*Alveolata Cavalier-Smith, 1991 **Incertae sedis Alveolata Colponema sp.

Found in bays Karanyinnaya and Kruglaya (samples 18 and 23).

*Rhizaria Cavalier-Smith, 2002

**Cercozoa Cavalier-Smith, 1998 emend. Adl et

al., 2005

***Metromonadea Cavalier-Smith, 2007 emend. Cavalier-Smith, 2011

Metopion fluens Larsen et Patterson, 1990. Found in the bays Kazachya, Kruglaya, and Streletskaya (samples 1, 21, and 23—24). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Tong (1997b), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Lee et al. (2003).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Korea (Lee, 2002), Tenerife (Vors, 1993b), Fiji, Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015); White Sea,

Pechora Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Kara Sea (Tikhonenkov et al., 2015), Baltic Sea (Vors,

1992), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009), equatorial Pacific Ocean (Vors et al., 1995).

Metromonasgrandis Larsen et Patterson, 1990

Found in the bays Solenaya and Karantinnaya (samples 16 and 18). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from marine waters of Korea (Lee, 2002), Fiji, Hawaii, Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee, 2006, 2015); White Sea, Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al.,

1993).

Metromonas simplex (Griessmann, 1913) Larsen et Patterson, 1990 [bas.: Phyllomonas simplex Griessmann, 1913].

Found in the bay Solenaya (sample 16). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Vors (1992), Tong (1997b), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Lee et al. (2003).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Tong, 1997b), Korea (Lee, 2002), Fiji, Hawaii, Brazil, Denmark (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Canada, Greenland (Vors, 1993a), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015), Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997); White Sea, Pechora Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Mediterranean Sea (Hausmann et al., 2002), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Germany (Auer and Arndt, 2001); from soils of China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012).

Micrometopion nutans Cavalier-Smith in Howe et al., 2011 (Fig. 1 k)

Found in the bay Kruglaya (samples 21 and 23). See the morphological description by Howe et al. (2011).

Previously reported from the White Sea (Howe et al., 2011).

***Imbricatea Cavalier-Smith, 2011 ****Spongomonadida Hibberd, 1983 Spongomonas sp.

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 1 and 6).

***Granofilosea Cavalier-Smith et Bass, 2009 Massisteria marina Larsen et Pattersen, 1990. Found in the bays Kazachya and Karantinnaya (samples 1-2, 4, 6, 12, and 18). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Vors (1992), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), Lee et al. (2003), and Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Korea (Lee, 2002), Fiji, Panama, Hawaii, Brazil, Denmark (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong, 1997c; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015); White Sea, Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Kara Sea (Tikhonenkov et al., 2015), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Mediterranean Sea (Hausmann et al., 2002; Arndt et al., 2003), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993), equatorial Pacific Ocean (Vors et al., 1995); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002).

***Thecofilosea Cavalier-Smith, 2003 emend. Cavalier-Smith, 2011 ****Cryomonadida Cavalier-Smith, 1993

Protaspa simplex (Vors, 1992) Cavalier-Smith in Howe et al., 2011 [bas.: Protaspis simplexVors, 1992].

Found in the bay Kruglaya (sample 21). See morphological descriptions by Vors (1992), Ekelund and Patterson (1997), Tong (1997b), and Lee et al. (2005).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Australia (Tong et al., 1998); White Sea, Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Kara Sea (Tikhonenkov et al., 2015), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Mediterranean Sea (Arndt et al., 2003); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006; Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Germany (Auer and Arndt, 2001), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Australia (Lee et al., 2005), Ethiopia (Prokina et al., 2017a); from

soils of Siberia (Shatilovich et al., 2010), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Australia (Ekelund and Patterson, 1997).

Protaspa tegere (Larsen et Patterson, 1990) Cavalier-Smith in Howe et al., 2011 [bas.: Protaspis tegere Larsen et Patterson, 1990] (Fig. 1 k—m).

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Karantinnaya (samples 6, 16, and 18).

Cell body is oval, 10-13x6.5-9.0 ^m, flattened in dorsoventral direction, and covered by small granules. Flagella emerge from subapical depression on the ventral side of the cell. Anterior flagellum is equal to cell body length; posterior flagellum is twice as long as cell body length. Pseudopodia produced from the longitudinal groove. Large round nucleus (4-6 ^m in diameter) with nucleus caps (Fig. 1 m) located anteriorly. Cells gliding at the substrate, anterior flagellum makes a flapping movement.

This species is very similar to P. glans (Skuja, 1939) Cavalier-Smith in Howe et al., 2011. The main difference from P. glans is presence of nucleus caps. According to Aydin and Lee (2012), nucleus caps can be overlooked in a light microscope. Location of nucleus of these species is different, but Lee and Patterson (2000) notice that nucleus can change location with aging of the cell. Therefore, these features are unclear, and two species can be synonyms. Size of observed cells is smaller if compared to previous descriptions (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Aydin and Lee, 2002; Lee, 2015). There is no mention of granules on the surface of the body in the original description; however, many authors point out this feature (Ekebom et al., 1995; Lee, 2002). Lee and Patterson (2000) noticed that some cells can lack such granules.

Previously reported from marine waters of Korea (Lee, 2002), Australia (Ekebom et al., 1995; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015), Fiji, Hawaii (Larsen and Patterson, 1990); Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012).

Protaspa verrucosa (Larsen et Patterson, 1990) Cavalier-Smith in Howe et al., 2011 [bas.: Protaspis verrucosa Larsen et Patterson, 1990] (Fig. 1 n-o).

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 12).

Cell body is flattened in dorsoventral direction, oblong-oval, its size is 14-15x6-7 ^m. Subapical depression located on the ventral side of the cell body. Thin flagella emerge from the subapical

depression. Anterior flagellum is equal to cell body length; posterior flagellum is slightly longer. The deep longitudinal ventral groove runs along the entire body. Surface of the cell body is covered by well-marked granules. Large round nucleus (3.5—4 ^m) without nucleus caps located anteriorly. Feeds on diatoms and green algae, as well as cysts of flagellates Pseudopedinella (Vors, 1992).

Observed cells almost completely correspond to morphological descriptions of other authors (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Vors, 1992; Tong et al., 1998). However, Vors (1992) and Tong et al. (1998) described smaller cell body length (5—10 ^m).

Previously reported from marine waters of Fiji, U.K. (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Canada, Greenland (Vors, 1993a), Australia (Tong et al., 1998), White Sea, Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006).

**Incertae sedis Rhizaria

Helkesimastix marina Cavalier-Smith et al., 2009 (Fig. 1 p).

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 1).

Cell body is oval, 6.0—6.5 ^m long, rounded anteriorly and tapered posteriorly. Cell body is covered by numerous granules. Anterior flagellum is short and located under the cell; it can be overlooked, but is clearly visible when cell rotates. Posterior flagellum is long (twice as long as the cell body), pasted to the cell and bears an acroneme.

First record of this species was from marine habitats of Belize (Cavalier-Smith et al., 2009). Organism differs from the better-known freshwater H. faecicola Woodcock et Lapage, 1915 by several features. Anterior flagellum of H. marina is not visible in light microscope. There is no contractile vacuole in H. marina. Cavalier-Smith et al. (2009) adapted this species to low salinity and appearing contractile vacuole did not have a permanent localization (contractile vacuole of H. faecicola is located posteriorly); size of the vacuole was always greater than in H. faecicola.

EXCAVATA Cavalier-Smith, 2002 emend. Simpson, 2003

*Discoba Simpson in Hampl et al., 2009 **Discicristata Cavalier-Smith, 1998 ***Euglenozoa Cavalier-Smith, 1981 emend. Simpson, 1997

****Euglenida Bütschli, 1884 *****Heteronematina Leedale, 1967

Anisonema acinus Dujardin, 1841.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 12). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), Lee et al. (2005), and Al-Yamani and Saburova (2010).

Previously reported from marine waters of Kuwait (Al-Yamani and Saburova, 2010), Fiji (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003); Danish Wadden Sea (Larsen, 1987), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Japan (Takamura et al., 2000), China (Tong et al., 1998), Australia (Schroeckh et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2005).

Anisonema trepidium Larsen, 1987.

Found in the bays Kazachya and Kruglaya (samples 1, 10, and 23). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Ekebom et al. (1995), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Lee (2008).

Previously reported from marine waters of Korea (Lee, 2002), Fiji, Hawaii, Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee, 2008, 2015); White Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Danish Wadden Sea (Larsen, 1987); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017), Australia (Schroeckh et al., 2003).

Dinema sp.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 6).

Heteronema exaratum Larsen et Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, Kamy-shovaya, and Kruglaya (samples 8, 16-17, and 22). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), Lee et al. (2003, 2005), Al-Yamani and Saburova (2010), and Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from marine waters of Korea (Lee, 2002), Kuwait (Al-Yamani and Saburova, 2010), Fiji (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2008, 2015); White Sea, Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012); from freshwaters of

the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Australia (Schroeckh et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2005).

Heteronema ovale Kahl, 1928 (Fig. 1 q—t).

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 6).

Cell body is oval, 12.0-20.0x8.5-11.0 ^m, flattened, highly metabolic. Cell body with pellicular striations following a S-helix, with small irregular granules along striations (Fig. 1 r). Flagella emerge subapically from a flagellar pocket. Anterior fla-gellum slightly longer than the cell body, posterior flagellum about 1.5 times as long as the cell body, with knob at the base. Metabolical cells can strar-ching into an oval cylinder or, as opposite, can compress (Fig. 1 s-t). Nucleus located at the anterior part of the cell body. Ingestion organelle is well developed. Consumes diatoms (Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002).

Morphology of observed cells agreed well with previous descriptions (Ekebom et al., 1995; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee, 2002); however, some authors notice a larger size of the cell body — 20-33 ^m (Lee, 2002; Aydin and Lee, 2012). This species is similar to H. exaratum by cell size. It differs by more vigorous squirming movements of a cell; lack of pointed posterior end of a cell body; as well as a characteristic feature of posterior flagellum of H. exaratum, which coils up at motionless cells. In addition, this species have the same pellicular striation on ventral and dorsal sides of cells (H. exaratum has more developed dorsal striation than ventral).

H. ovale is similar to H. larseni, which was originally defined and described as H. exaratum (Larsen, 1987), and then separated into a new species (Lee and Patterson, 2000). H. larsenidiffers by pointed posterior end of a cell body. This feature can also appear in H. exaratum, but only at metaboly (Al-Quassab et al., 2002).

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

Previously reported from marine waters of Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002), Fiji (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Kuwait (Al-Yamani and Saburova, 2010), Korea (Lee, 2002), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012); from freshwaters ofthe European part of Russia (Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017).

Notosolenus tamanduensis Larsen et Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bays Kruglaya and Streletskaya (samples 22 and 24). See morphological descriptions

by Larsen and Patterson (1990), and Lee and Patterson (2000).

Previously reported from marine waters of Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Lee and Patterson, 2000); from freshwaters of Australia (Schroeckh et al., 2003).

Notosolenus urceolatus Larsen et Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bays Kazachya and Karantinnaya (samples 1, 3-4, 6, 9, and 18). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Lee et al. (2003).

Previously reported from marine waters of Korea (Lee, 2002), Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2008, 2015); Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Australia (Schroeckh et al., 2003).

Notosolenus sp.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 7).

Petalomonas labrum Lee et Patterson, 2000 (Fig. 2 a, b).

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Kruglaya (samples 6, 16, and 21).

Cell body is oval with elongated posterior end, slightly curved to the right. Size of the cell body is 12-15x6.5-9 ^m. Ventral side is slightly concave. Anterior end is round, with wide opening of the flagellar pocket, which has a dense marginal rim (Fig. 2 b). Single flagellum approximately equal to cell body length or slightly longer. Nucleus on the right-hand side. Cells gliding, while the posterior end of the body raised above the substrate.

Morphology of observed cells almost completely corresponds to the original description (Lee and Patterson, 2000). This species similar to P. poosilla; however, P. labrum differs by larger body size, narrowed posterior end of the body, and a wide dense marginal rim of an opening offlagellar pocket.

Previously reported from marine waters of Australia (Lee and Patterson, 2000; Schroeckh et al., 2003) and White Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006).

Petalomonas minor Larsen and Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Kruglaya (samples 2, 10, 16, and 21). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990),

Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Al-Yamani and Saburova (2010).

Previously reported from marine waters of Korea (Lee, 2002), Kuwait (Al-Yamani and Saburova, 2010), Fiji (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002); White Sea, Pechora Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006, Prokina et al., 2017b), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Australia (Schroeckh et al., 2003); from soils of China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012).

Petalomonas minuta Hollande, 1942 [syn.: Petalomonas minutula Christen, 1962].

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 4 and 9). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Vors (1992), Lee and Patterson (2000), and Lee et al. (2003, 2005).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Korea (Lee, 2002), Fiji, Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee, 2015); White Sea, Pechora, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Danish Wadden Sea (Larsen, 1987), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Mediterranean Sea (Arndt et al., 2003), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Japan (Takamura et al., 2000), Australia (Schroeckh et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2005).

Petalomonas poosilla (Skuja, 1948) Larsen et Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, Karantinnaya, and Kruglaya (samples 5—6, 10—11, 14, 16, 20—21, and 23). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Vors (1992), Tong (1997b), Lee and Patterson (2000), and Lee et al. (2003, 2005).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Korea (Lee, 2002), Fiji, Hawaii, Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Belize, Tenerife (Vors, 1993b), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab

Fig. 2. Light microscopy of heterotrophic flagellates (DIC): a, b - Petalomonas labrum; c-e - Gweamonas unicus (d - turning of the cell, e - pellicular striation); f-g - Pendulomonas adriperis; h-j - Platychilomonas psammobia; k-m - Zoelucasa sablensis; n-o - Planomonas cephalopora; p-q - P. melba; r-t - Amastigomonas muscula (s - turning of the cell). Scale bars: a,b, h-j - 10 ^m; c-g, k-t - 5 ^m.

et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2008, 2015); White Sea, Pechora Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Danish Wadden Sea (Larsen, 1987), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Mediterranean Sea (Arndt et al., 2003), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006, Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), Siberia (Romanov, 2005), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Japan (Takamura et al., 2000), Australia (Schroeckh et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2005), Ethiopia (Prokina et al., 2017a); from soils of Australia (Ekelund and Patterson, 1997).

Ploeotia oblonga Larsen et Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 8). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Lee and Patterson (2000), and Al-Yamani and Saburova (2010).

Previously reported from marine waters of Kuwait (Al-Yamani and Saburova, 2010), Fiji (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Lee, 2008, 2015); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia and China (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Australia (Schroeckh et al., 2003).

Urceolus cristatus Larsen et Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 4). See the morphological description by Larsen and Patterson (1990).

Previously reported from marine waters of Fiji (Larsen and Patterson, 1990).

Urceolus pasheri Skvortzow, 1924.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 6). See morphological descriptions by Vetrova (1980), Larsen (1987), and Romanov (2005).

Previously reported from White Sea (Tikho-nenkov, 2006), Danish Wadden Sea (Larsen, 1987); from freshwaters of Siberia (Romanov, 2005), Ukraine (Vetrova, 1980), Japan (Takamura et al., 2000).

****Kinetoplastea Honigberg, 1963 *****Metakinetoplastina Vickerman in Moreira et al., 2004

******Neobodonida Vickerman in Moreira et al., 2004

Neobodo curvifilus (Griessmann, 1914) Moreira et al., 2004 [bas.: Bodo curvifilus Griessmann, 1913].

Found in the bay Solenaya (sample 15). See morphological descriptions by Tong et al. (1997), Lee et al. (2003), and Shatilovich et al. (2010).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Greenland (Vors, 1993a), Australia (Lee and Patterson, 2000; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2015), Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997); White Sea, Pechora Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Mediterranean Sea (Arndt et al., 2003), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006, Prokina, Mylnikov, 2017), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Antarctic (Butler et al., 2000); from soils of Siberia (Shatilovich et al., 2010).

Neobodo designis (Skuja, 1948) Moreira et al., 2004 [bas.: Bodo designis Skuja, 1948].

Found in the bays Kazachya, Kamyshovaya, Karantinnaya, and Kruglaya (samples 1—2, 4, 6, 8—12, 17—18, and 23). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Vors (1992), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Lee et al. (2003).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Tong, 1997b), Greenland (Vors, 1993a), Korea (Lee, 2002), Belize, Tenerife (Vors, 1993b), Fiji, Hawaii, Panama, Brazil, Danish Wadden Sea (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong, 1997c; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015), Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997); White Sea, Pechora Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Mediterranean Sea (Hausmann et al., 2002; Arndt et al., 2003), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009), South China Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993), equatorial Pacific Ocean (Vors et al., 1995); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006, Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), Siberia (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), U.K. (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Mongolia (Kopylov et al.,

2006), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Ethiopia (Prokina et al., 2017a), Australia (Lee et al., 2005), Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997; Butler et al., 2000); from soils ofSiberia (Shatilovich et al., 2010), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012; Tikhonenkov, 2006).

Rhynchomonas nasuta (Stokes, 1888) Klebs, 1893 [bas.: Heteromita nasuta Stokes, 1888].

Found in all observed bays (samples 2-8, 13-19, 22, and 24). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Lee et al. (2005).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Canada (Vors, 1993a), Korea (Lee, 2002), Fiji, Hawaii, Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015), Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997); White Sea, Pechora Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Kara Sea (Tikhonenkov et al., 2015), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992; Ikävalko, 1998), Mediterranean Sea (Hausmann et al., 2002), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993), equatorial Pacific Ocean (Vors et al., 1995); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006, Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Germany (Auer and Arndt, 2001), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012, Tikhonenkov, 2006, Tong et al., 1998), Japan (Takamura et al., 2000), Thailand (Charubhun and Charubhun, 2000), Ethiopia (Prokina et al., 2017a), Australia (Lee et al., 2005), Antarctic (Butler et al., 2000); from soils of Australia (Ekelund and Patterson, 1997).

******Parabodonida Vickerman in Moreira et al., 2004

Parabodo caudatus (Dujardin, 1841) Moreira et al., 2004 [bas.: Amphimonas caudata Dujardin, 1841; syn.: Diplomastixcaudata Kent, 1880; Bodo caudatus (Dujardin, 1841) Stein, 1878].

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 5 and 11). See morphological descriptions by Al-Quassab et al. (2002) and Lee et al. (2005).

Previously reported from marine waters of Australia (Al-Quassab et al., 2002); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Prokina and Myl-

nikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Japan (Takamura et al., 2000), Australia (Lee et al., 2005); from soils of China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012).

Parabodo nitrophilus Skuja, 1948.

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 2 and 4). See the morphological description by Mylnikov et al. (2002).

Previously reported from White Sea (Tikho-nenkov, 2006); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012); from soils of China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012).

******Eubodonida Vickerman in Moreira et al., 2004

Bodo saltans Ehrenberg, 1832.

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 8). See morphological descriptions by Vors (1992), Patterson and Simpson (1996), Tong et al. (1997), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Lee et al. (2005).

Previously reported from marine waters ofBelize (Vors, 1993b), Australia (Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong et al., 1998; Al-Quassab et al., 2002), Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997); White Sea, Pechora Sea, South China Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Mediterranean Sea (Hausmann et al., 2002; Arndt et al., 2003), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006, Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Germany (Auer and Arndt, 2001), U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012, Tikhonenkov, 2006), Japan (Takamura et al., 2000), Thailand (Charubhun and Charubhun, 2000), Ethiopia (Prokina et al., 2017a), Australia (Lee et al., 2005), Antarctic (Butler et al., 2000).

*****Incertae sedis Kinetoplastea

Bordnamonas tropicana Larsen et Patterson, 1990

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Kruglaya (samples 1, 6, 9, 16, and 21-22). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), Lee et al. (2003), and Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Tong, 1997b), Korea (Lee, 2002), Belize (Vors, 1993b), Fiji, Panama, Brazi, Danish Wadden Sea (Larsen and

Patterson, 1990), Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015); White Sea, Pechora Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Mediterranean Sea (Hausmann et al., 2002), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993), equatorial Pacific Ocean (Vors et al., 1995); from freshwaters ofthe European part of Russia (Prokina, Mylnikov, 2017).

Incertae sedis EUKARYOTA

Developaella elegans Tong, 1995.

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 1 and 8). See morphological descriptions by Tong (1997b), Lee and Patterson (2000), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1993, 1997b), Korea (Lee, 2002), Australia (Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong, 1997c; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee, 2006, 2007, 2015); Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012).

Discocelis punctata Larsen et Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Karantinnaya (samples 1, 9, 16, 18). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Tong et al. (1998), Lee and Patterson (2000), and Lee (2002).

Previously reported from marine waters of Korea (Lee, 2002), Fiji, Brazil (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Australia (Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000).

Gweamonas unicus Lee, 2002 (Fig. 2 c—e).

Found in the bays Kazachya and Karantinnaya (samples 6, 9, and 18).

Cell body is oval, 5—6x3—3.5 ^m. Single flagellum is half as long as cell body length, directed posteriorly and coils up when the cell stops moving. Flagellum lies in a longitudinal groove, which is located on the ventral side of the cell body. Surface of the cell body with pellicular striations (Fig. 2 e). Cells glides slowly and often change direction of movement. When a cell turns, flagellum can leave the longitudinal groove (Fig. 2 d).

This species was originally described from marine waters of Australia (Lee, 2002). All features (size, cell morphology and behavior) correspond to the original description.

Kiitoksia ystava Vors, 1992

Found in the bays Kazachya, Solenaya, and Karantinnaya (samples 6, 16, and 18). See morphological descriptions by Vors (1992), Tong (1997b), Lee et al. (2003), and Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Canada (Vors, 1993a), Australia (Tong et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015); White Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Mediterranean Sea (Hausmann et al., 2002), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); from freshwaters of Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008).

Pendulomonas adriperis Tong, 1997 (Fig. 2 f—g).

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 4 and 8).

Cell body is oval, 4—5x3—4 ^m, with small subapical depression on the ventral side. Flagella emerge from small prominence, located in the upper third part of the ventral side of cell body (Fig. 2 g). Cell attached to the substrate by the posterior flagellum, which periodically cowers. Anterior flagellum directed anteriorly and slightly vibrates. Length of flagella is approximately equal to the length of the cell body. Large nucleus located near flagella emergence. Cells can swim (Tong, 1997b, 1997c; Al-Quassab et al., 2002), but only attached cells were observed.

These species were originally described from marine waters of U.K. and Australia (Tong, 1997b). Morphology of observed cells almost completely corresponds to the first description, except for a narrowed posterior end of a cell body. Many authors described both narrowed and rounded posterior ends of a body (Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee, 2002; Lee et al., 2003). Lee et al. (2003) described larger cell body sizes (7—10 ^m). P. adriperis similar to species from the genus Cafeteria Fenchel et Patterson, 1988. However, flagella of Cafeteria emerge apically, while flagella of Pendulomonas emerge subapically. Moriya et al. (2000) described a very similar species Wobblia lunata Moriya et al., 2000 without references to P. adriperis. According to most researchers, W. lunata is ajunior synonym of P. adriperis (Karpov et al., 2001; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Japan ([as Wobblia lunata] Moriya et al., 2000), Australia (Tong, 1997b; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee, 2002; Lee et al., 2003); Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009).

Platychilomonas psammobia Larsen et Patterson, 1990 (Fig. 2 h-j).

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 10).

Cell body is flattened in dorsoventral direction, 11-14x7-10 ^m, oval with slightly narrowed anterior and posterior ends. Cells attached to the substrate by posterior flagellum, distal part ofwhich lies entirely on the substrate and folds into several turns of a spiral (Fig. 2 j). Anterior flagellum makes rhythmic beats, straightens out and collapses, slightly twisting the front end of the body (Fig. 2 h-i). Cells slightly swaying. Flagella emerge from the right-hand side of the cell and lie at the longitudinal groove. Row of extrusomes lies along the groove. Nucleus situated in the posterior part of the cell body.

Morphology of observed cells corresponds to known descriptions (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Yamani and Saburova, 2010). However, the size of observed cells was slightly smaller. Consumers of algae (Lee and Patterson, 2000).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K., Fiji (Larsen and Patterson, 1990), Korea (Lee, 2002), Kuwait (Al-Yamani and Saburova, 2010), Australia (Lee and Patterson, 2000; Lee, 2006), Danish Watt Sea (Larsen and Patterson, 1990).

Zoelucasa sablensis Nicholls, 2012 (Fig. 2 k-m).

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 12 and 14).

Cell body is ovoid, 8-10x5-7 ^m, with elongated posterior and slightly narrowed anterior end. Cell body fills a lorica and is covered by large round siliceous scales with diameter 3-4 ^m. Large flagellar pocket situated at the anterior part of the cell body. Flagella emerge from a small depression at the anterior end of the cell body and positioned in parallel (Fig. 2 l). Anterior flagellum is short (2-3 ^m), directed anteriorly and makes weak flapping movements. Posterior flagellum is slightly longer than the cell body (Fig. 2 m). Cells gliding slowly. Empty lorica of dead cells were also observed in samples.

This species was originally described from Atlantic Ocean (Nicholls, 2012) and apparently is very rare. Morphology of observed cells corresponds to the original description.

*Ancyromonadida Cavalier-Smith, 1998

Ancyromonas sigmoides Kent, 1880.

Found in all observed bays, except the bay Kamyshovaya (samples 1, 3-4, 6, 8-10, 12, 14-16,

18, 22, and 24). See morphological descriptions by Vors (1992), Tong (1997b), Al-Quassab et al. (2002), and Lee et al. (2003, 2005).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1993, 1997b), Greenland, Canada (Tong et al., 1997), Tenerife (Vors, 1993b), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Korea (Lee, 2002), Australia (Ekebom et al., 1995; Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong, 1997c; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Lee, 2006, 2015), Antarctic (Tong et al., 1997); White Sea, Pechora Sea, Black Sea, South China Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Kara Sea (Tikhonenkov et al., 2015), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Mediterranean Sea (Arndt et al., 2003), Red Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2009), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993), equatorial Pacific Ocean (Vors et al., 1995); from brackish waters of Siberia (Kopylov et al., 2002); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006, Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), Siberia (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006), Ethiopia (Prokina et al., 2017a), Australia (Lee et al., 2005), Antarctic (Butler et al., 2000); from soils of China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Australia (Ekelund and Patterson, 1997).

Ancyromonas sp.

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 1 and 4).

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

Planomonas cephalopora (Larsen et Patterson, 1990) Cavalier-Smith in Cavalier-Smith et al., 2008 [bas.: Bodo cephalopora Larsen et Patterson, 1990; syn.: Ancyromonas cephalopora (Larsen et Patterson, 1990) Heiss et al., 2010] (Fig. 2 n-o).

Found in the bays Kazachya, Karantinnaya, and Kruglaya (samples 12, 16, and 21).

Cell body is roundish with flattened ventral side and truncated anterior end. Size of the cell body is 4-6x3.5-5 ^m. Two rows of extrusomes located in the wide rostrum (Fig. 2 n). Anterior flagellum is equal to cell body length, thin and weakly visible, and makes flapping movements. Posterior flagellum twice as long as the cell body, and bears acroneme. There are several large vacuoles in the posterior part of the cell.

This species differs from other species of the genera Planomonas and Ancyromonas by a larger size of a cell body, wide rostrum with two rows of extrusomes and large vacuoles in a posterior part of a cell. But sometimes the second row of extrusomes can be very difficult to see. Organism

was originally described as Bodo cephaloporus (Larsen and Patterson, 1990). However, the authors made a notice that placement of a new species in Kinetoplastida Honigberg, 1963 is questionable due to lack of electron microscopic studies, and assumed the change of a systematic position of this species in future.

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K., Fiji, Hawaii, Panama, Australia, Northern Atlantic (Larsen and Patterson, 1990).

Planomonas melba (Patterson et Simpson, 1996). Cavalier-Smith in Cavalier-Smith et al., 2008 [bas.: Ancyromonas melba Patterson et Simpson, 1996] (Fig. 2 p-q).

Found in the bay Kruglaya (sample 21).

Cell body is oval, dorsoventrally flattened, with slightly concave ventral side. Size of the cell body is 5-6x3.5-4.5 ^m. Ventral groove is located at the anterior lateral part of the body and turns into a longitudinal depression along the ventral side of the body (Fig. 2 q). Rostrum exits into the ventral groove and carries extrusomes. Anterior flagellum emerges from the base of the rostrum; it is equal in length to the cell body, and in thickness corresponds to the posterior flagellum (Fig. 2 p). Posterior flagellum is acronematic, 1.5-2 times of cell body length, emerges from the ventral groove.

This species resembles the widespread A. sig-moides (Kent, 1880) Heiss et al., 2010. It can be distinguished from A. sigmoides (as well as from other species of Ancyromonas and Planomonas) by thick anterior flagellum, which is equal in thickness to posterior one. Also, P. melba is longer than A. sigmoides and their ventral side of a body concaved stronger. Some authors pointed out a complete reduction of an acronema of posterior flagellum (Tong et al., 1997), but it was observed in our investigation. Tong et al. (1998) mistakenly used the name A. magna, when described A. melba. However, A. magna Zhang et al., 1993 is a completely different species.

Previously reported from hypersaline waters of Australia (60-150%c) (Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Al-Quassab et al., 2002); from marine waters ofAntarctica (Patterson and Simpson, 1996; Tong et al., 1997), Australia ([as A. magna] Tong et al., 1998).

Planomonas micra Cavalier-Smith in Cavalier-Smith et al., 2008 [syn.: Ancyromonas micra (Cavalier-Smith in Cavalier-Smith et al., 2008) Heiss et al., 2010.

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 2 and 3). See the morphological description by Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from the Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012).

*Apusomonadidae Karpov et Mylnikov, 1989

Amastigomonas caudata Zhukov, 1975

Found in the bays Kazachya, Karantinnaya, and Kruglaya (samples 4, 9-10, 12, 18-19, and 22). See the morphological description by Prokina and Mylnikov (2017).

Previously reported from the White Sea, Black Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006; Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012).

Amastigomonas muscula Mylnikov, 1999 (Fig. 2 r-t).

Found in the bay Kazachya (sample 4).

Cell body is oval, 4-5 ^m long. Anterior end of the cell body is tapered and slightly curved, forming a small proboscis. Posterior end of the cell body is rounded. Anterior flagellum is short, poorly visible. Posterior flagellum extends beyond the cell, 6.5-7 ^m in length. Anterior one third of the body separated from posterior two thirds by the constriction, which is well visible during cell rotation (Fig. 2 s). There are many small granules in the cytoplasm. Flagellates move fast and directly.

This species was originally described from the Baltic Sea with salinity 8-9%o (Mylnikov, 1999). Mophology of observed cells almost completely corresponds to the original description, but the author specified cell sizes almost 2 times larger. Nevertheless, we consider this fact as intraspecific variability

*Cryptophyceae Pascher, 1913 emend. Schoenichen, 1925 emend. Adl et al., 2012 **Goniomonas Stein, 1878 [Goniomonadales No-varino et Lucas, 1993]

Goniomonas amphinema Larsen et Patterson, 1990.

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 4 and 6). See morphological descriptions by Larsen and Patterson (1990), Vors (1992), Lee and Patterson (2000), and Al-Quassab et al. (2002).

Previously reported from marine waters of Korea (Lee, 2002), Belize, Tenerife (Vors, 1993b), Fiji, Panama, U.K. (Larsen and Patterson, 1990),

Australia (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Tong et al., 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2002; Lee, 2006, 2015); White Sea, Pechora Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Kara Sea (Tikhonenkov et al., 2015), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), Mediterranean Sea (Hausmann et al., 2002), Northern Atlantic Ocean (Patterson et al., 1993); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006).

Goniomonas truncata (Fresenius, 1858) Stein, 1878 [bas.: Monas truncata Fresenius, 1858].

Found in the bays Kazachya and Solenaya (samples 1, 6, 8, 12, and 16). See morphological descriptions by Vors (1992), Ekelund and Patterson (1997), Lee et al. (2005), and Prokina et al. (2017).

Previously reported from marine waters of Belize (Vors, 1993b); Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992); from freshwaters of the European part of Russia (Tikhonenkov, 2006; Prokina and Mylnikov, 2017; Prokina et al., 2017b), Siberia (Romanov, 2005; Tikhonenkov, 2006), Hungary (Kiss et al., 2008), Germany (Auer and Arndt, 2001), Mongolia (Kopylov et al., 2006), China (Tikhonenkov, 2006; Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Ethiopia (Prokina et al., 2017b), Australia (Lee et al., 2005); from soils of Siberia (Shatilovich et al., 2010), China (Tikhonenkov et al., 2012), Australia (Ekelund and Patterson, 1997).

**Kathablepharidae Vors, 1992

Kathablepharis remigera (Vors, 1992) Clay et Kugrens, 1999 [bas.: Leucocryptos remigera Vors, 1992].

Found in the bay Kazachya (samples 9 and 10). See morphological descriptions by Vors (1992), Tong (1997b), Lee and Patterson (2000), and Aydin and Lee (2012).

Previously reported from marine waters of U.K. (Tong, 1997b), Greenland, Canada (Vors, 1993a), Australia (Lee and Patterson, 2000; Lee, 2006); White Sea (Tikhonenkov, 2006), Baltic Sea (Vors, 1992; Ikävalko, 1998), Aegean Sea (Aydin and Lee, 2012), equatorial Pacific Ocean (Vors et al., 1995).

Kathablepharis sp.

Found in the bays Kazachya and Karantinnaya (samples 9 and 18).

*Centroplasthelida Febvre-Chevalier et Febvre, 1984 **Pterocystida Cavalier-Smith, 2012 ***Choanocystidae Cavalier-Smith et von der Heyden, 2007

Choanocystis aff. minima Zlatogursky, 2010 (Fig. 3 i-l).

Found in the bays Kazachya, Karantinnaya, and Kruglaya (samples 12, 20, and 21).

Cell body is covered by two types of siliceous scales. Radial scales with hollow shaft and heart-shaped flattened base. Slightly curved shaft is 3.5-6.0 ^m in length and 0.05-0.07 ^m in diameter, departs from the excavation of base. Base is 0.8-1.0x0.5-0.7 ^m, with a dense marginal rim and 25-30 radial, sometimes branching ribs (Fig. 3 l). Ovoid plate scales are 3.5-4.5x1.5-2.0 ^m, with wide longitudinal depression.

The species C. minima was originally described from freshwater lake in the European part of Russia (Zlatogursky, 2010). Morphology of observed cells is similar to the original description of C. minima: size of scales is completely consistent. However, we observed some differences in morphology: base of a shaft of C. minima with thin margin, without dense marginal rim, and without radial ribs; plate scales flattened, without longitudinal depression. Radial ribs on a base of shaft are known for C. ebelii Wujek et Elsner, 1992, but these species are different in many other aspects (size of radial scales of C. ebelii is larger; plate scales larger and with more elongated shape, possess subparallel ribs) (Wujek and Elsner, 1992; Mikrjukov, 2002). Morphology of C. lepidula Penard, 1904 is similar to observed cells, but size of scales in C. lepidula is larger, and its plate scales ornamented with granules (Siemensma and Roijackers, 1988; Mikrjukov, 2002). C. rossica (Mikrjukov, 1995) Mikrjukov, 2002 has larger size of scales, which are characterized by different morphology: shaft of radial scales expands to a base; base of radial scales with straight thin margin; plate scales flattened, with medial constriction (Mikrjukov, 2002).

***Pterocystidae Cavalier-Smith et von der Heyden, 2007

Raineriophrys raineri (Siemensma et Roijackers, 1988) Mikrjukov, 2001.

Found in the bays Kazachya and Kruglaya (samples 12 and 21).

Cell body is covered by two types of siliceous scales. Radial scales with cylindrical hollow shaft and rounded flattened base. Shaft ofradial scales is 3.84.5 ^m in length, 0.05-0.07 ^m in diameter. Apex of shaft slightly tapers, with two teeth. Proximal part of the shaft strongly curved, connected to the base with lateral membranes, and forms deepening. Base of the shaft is 0.5-0.7 ^m in diameter. Plate scales

Fig. 3. Electron microscopy of heterotrophic flagellates and centrohelid heliozoans (a—h, k—p — TEM; i—j — SEM). a — Stephanoeca diplocostata; b—d — Paraphysomonas cylicophora; e—h — Clathromonas butcheri (g — plate mesh scales; h - crown-scale); i-l - Choanocystis aff. minima (j - radial scale; l - base of radial scale); m-p - Raineriophrys raineri (o - plate scales; p - radial scale). Scale bars: a, e- f, i, k, m-o - 5 ^m; b-c - 3 ^m; d, g-h, j, p - 1 ^m; l - 0.5 ^m.

oval shaped, 2.0-2.4x1.1-1.9 ^m, with longitudinal depression.

R. raineri was originally described from fresh-waters of the Netherlands (Siemensma and Roi-jackers, 1988). Morphology of observed cells corresponds to the original description. Leonov and Mylnikov (2012) notice larger size of radial scales (6-8 ^m) and plate scales (2.4-2.9x1.8-2.1 ^m). This species is similar to R. erinaceoides (Petersen and Hansen, 1960) Mikrjukov, 2001 and differs by larger scales, ovate form of plate scales and strong curve of the proximal part of the shaft.

Previously reported from freshwaters of the Netherlands (Siemensma and Roijackers, 1988), the European part of Russia (Leoniv and Mylnikov, 2012); from saline inland water bodies of the European part of Russia (Gerasimova and Plotni-kov, 2015).

Discussion

Among observed organisms, only 18 species have been indicated previously in the Black Sea (Mikrjukov and Mylnikov, 1998; Tikhonenkov, 2006). Forty-four species were found here for the first time. Most species are common and widespread, known not only from marine, but also from fresh-water habitats (35 species): Actinomonas mirabilis, Amastigomonas caudata, Ancyromonas sigmoides, Anisonema acinus, A.trepidium, Bodo saltans, Bordnamonas tropicana, Cafeteria marsupialis, C. roenbergensis, Clathromo-nas butcheri, Codosiga botrytis, Goniomonas amphi-nema, G. truncata, Heteronema exaratum, H. ovale, Kiitoksia ystava, Metromonas simplex, Neobodo curvifilus, N. designis, Notosolenus tamanduensis, N. urceolatus, Parabodo caudatus, P. nitrophilus, Petalomonas minor, P. minuta, P. poosilla, Ploeotia oblonga, Protaspa simplex, P. verrucosa, Pteridomonas danica, Raineriophrys raineri, Rhynchomonas nasuta, Sal-pingoeca amphoridium, S. megacheila, Urceolus pasheri. Fourteen species are also known from soils: Ancyromonas sigmoides, Codosiga botrytis, Goniomonas truncata, Metromonas simplex, Neobodo curvifilus, N. designis, Parabodo caudatus, P. nitrophilus, Petalomonas minor, P. poosilla, Protaspa simplex, Rhynchomonas nasuta, Salpingoeca ampho-ridium, S. megacheila (Ekelund and Patterson, 1997; Shatilovich et al., 2010; Tikhonenkov et al., 2010, 2012). The data obtained here confirm the euryhalinity and ubiquity of the most observed flagellate and centrohelid morphospecies. But some species are known only from marine habitats, 11 of

which (Amastigomonas muscula, Bicosoeca maris, Gweamonas unicus, Helkesimastix marina, Multicilia marina, Pendulomonas adriperis, Planomonas ce-phalopora, P. micra, Platychilomonas psammobia, Salpingoeca abyssalis, Zoelucasa sablensis) are rare and probably poorly studied.

Most of observed species are common in different geographical zones from all continents. More than a half of studied species (50 species) were previously found in Australia. This is an indicator of a good study ofthe region, rather than greater species diversity in comparison with other continents. Thus, for a better understanding of the biogeography of protists, studies of species composition of protozoa throughout the world are necessary. The distribution of some species has not yet been studied, since they have recently been described, they are very rare or difficult to identify (Gweamonas unicus, Helkesimastix marina, Micrometopion nutans, Salpin-goeca abyssalis, Zoelucasa sablensis).

Most common species (found in more than a half of observed samples) were Cafeteria roenbergensis (17 samples), Rhynchomonas nasuta (16 samples) and Ancyromonas sigmoides (15 samples). Twenty two species were rare and found only in one sample (Amastigomonas muscula, Anisonema acinus, Bicosoeca gracilipes, B. maris, Bodo saltans, Codosiga botrytis, Dinema sp., Helkesimastix marina, Heteronema ovale, Neobodo curvifilus, Notosolenus sp., Metromonas simplex, Paraphysomonas cylico-phora, Planomonas melba, Platychilomonas psammo-bia, Ploeotia oblonga, Protaspa simplex, P. verrucosa, Salpingoeca amphoridium, S. megacheila, Urceolus cristatus, U. pasheri).

Most of observed species are bacterivorous, but 14 species consume eukaryotes. Heterotrophic and phototrophic flagellates are consumed by 11 species: Actinomonas mirabilis; Choanocystis aff. minima; Colponema sp.; Goniomonas amphinema; G. truncata; Kathablepharis remigera; Kathablepharis sp.; Paraphysomonas cylicophora; Platychilomonas psammobia; Pteridomonas danica; Raineriophrys raineri (Vors, 1992; Lee and Patterson, 2000). Nacked amoebae are consumed by Multicilia marina (Nikolaev et al., 2006). Diatoms are consumed by Heteronema exaratum and H. ovale (Lee and Patterson, 2000; Al-Quassab et al., 2006).

Morphology of observed cells of 18 species of heterotrophic flagellates and 2 species of heliozoans is consistent with previous descriptions; however, some variations in size of cell bodies, lorica, flagella, and stalks were observed. Cell bodies of Multicilia marina, Protaspa tegere, Pendulomonas adriperis,

Amastigomonas muscula and Heteronema ovale were smaller than described earlier (Larsen and Patterson, 1990; Ekebom et al., 1995; Mikrjukov and Mylnikov, 1998; Mylnikov, 1999; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Lee, 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Aydin and Lee, 2012). While observed cells of Protaspa verrucosa are characterized by larger size than previously reported (Vors, 1992; Tong et al., 1998).

Some morphological features (size and shape of body cells, siliceous scales and costae of lorica) can vary in different specimens due to intraspecific variability, influence of environmental parameters, or even variations within the same organism in different periods of ontogenesis (Leadeater, 1979; Mikrjukov and Mylnikov, 1998; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Bergesch et al., 2008; Cavalier-Smith et al., 2009; Scoble and Cavalier-Smith, 2014). Changing of the water salinity can affect shape and size of the cell body of Multicilia marina (Mikrjukov and Mylnikov, 1998), as well as formation of contractile vacuoles and movement change in Helkesimastix marina (Cavalier-Smith et al., 2009). Studies ofthe life cycle in clonal cultures have shown changes of some morphological features in ontogenesis. E.g., number of ribs, size and shape of the cell body of Stephanoeca diplocostata, size of siliceous scales and numbers of hollows in scales of Clathromonas butcheri, localization of the nucleus in Protaspa tegere (Leadeater, 1979; Lee and Patterson, 2000; Bergesch et al., 2008; Scoble and Cavalier-Smith, 2014).

Different authors use different approaches for systematics of heterotrophic flagellates and species identification and also interpret differently a morphological variability in cells, presence or absence of some features. For example, Salpingoeca marina differs from Salpingoeca infusionum by such a doubtful feature like narrowed anterior end of the lorica. Difference of S. inquillata, S. curvipes, S. ringens and S. eurystoma from S. infusionum is the widened anterior end of the lorica. As the result, different authors have different opinions on whether these organisms should be considered as different species or they need to be reduced to synonyms. For a better understanding of intraspecific variability, molecular phylogenetic and morphological studies in clonal cultures are needed.

Among the studied sites of the Black Sea, the greatest species richness was observed in scrapings from the base of the metal pier in the bay Kazachya (sample 6 — 22 species) and in sludge from the bay Solenaya (sample 16 — 20 species). Among all six observed bays, most species were found in the

bay Kazachya (60 species), which may be caused by the larger number of samples taken in this bay in comparison with other bays. Only one species (Rhynchomonas nasuta) was found in all the observed bays.

Analysis of the similarity of flagellate communities by species composition in different types of habitats reveals four groups of microbiotopes with more than 50% similarity (Fig. 4). However, the most noticeable is the cluster of 5 samples with the similarity of more than 65%: (1) storm surges at the waterfront (the bay Kazachya, sample 5); (2) scrapings with Ulva sp. (the bay Kazachya, sample 11); (3) scrapings from stones (the bay Kazachya, sample 14); (4) detritus among thickets of Phragmites australis (the bay Solenaya, sample 15); (5) littoral sand (the bay Streletskaya, sample 24). There is no relationship between these microbiotopes (type of bottom sediment, distance from a shore, or a depth). Probably, there is not enough data for such analysis of species distrubituon within the microbiotopes and further researches are needed.

A total of 68 species of heterotrophic flagellates and 2 species of centrohelid heliozoans were encountered in this survey, ofwhich 44 species are the first records for the Black Sea. Many species are known not only from marine but also from freshwater and soil habitats; many of them have a cosmopolitan distribution. Most observed species feed on bacteria, 14 species consume other protists (heterotrophic flagellates, algae, and naked amoebae). Morphology of observed cells almost completely corresponds with previous descriptions. New details of the structure and behavior of cells obtained during this study have complemented our knowledge of intraspecific variability of these organisms.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (17-04-00565, 15-2902518). We are grateful to Ilya S. Turbanov for the sampling, and Denis V. Tikhonenkov for the discussions of the present paper and valuable suggestions.

References

Adl S.M., Simpson A.G.B., Lane C.E., Lukes J., Bass D. et al. 2012. The revised classification of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryotic Microbiol. 59, 429-493.

25 8 2 17 19

4 3

5 11 15 14 24 10 22 23

16 9 18 1

13 21 12 7 20

~i—

30

~I—

40

i—

50

i

60

i

70

i—

80

i

90

—r

100

Fig. 4. Dendrogram showing the Bray-Curtis similarity (%) between observed sites (numbering in accordance with Table 1).

Al-Quassab S., Lee W.J., Murray S., Simpson A.G.B. and Patterson D.J. 2002. Flagellates from stromatolites and surrounding sediments in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Acta Protozool. 41, 91—144.

Al-Yamani F.Y. and Saburova M.A. 2010. Illustrated guide on the flagellates of Kuwaits intertidal soft sediments. Kuwait: Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research.

Arndt H., Dietriech D., Auer B., Cleven E.-J., Grafenhan T., Wietere M. and Mylnikov A.P. 2000. Functional diversity of heterotrophic flagellates in aquatic ecosystems. In: The flagellates: Unity, diversity and evolution. (Eds: Leadbeater B.S.C. and Green J.C.). Taylor and Francis, London and New York, pp. 240-268.

Arndt H., Hausmann K. and Wolf M. 2003. Deep-sea heterotrophic nanoflagellates of the Eastern Mediterranean sea: qualitative and quan-

titative aspects of their pelagic and benthic occurrence. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 256, 45—56.

Auer B. and Arndt H. 2001. Taxonomic composition and biomass of heterotrophic flagellates in relation to lake trophy and season. Freshwater Biol. 46, 959-972.

Aydin E.E. and Lee W.J. 2012. Free-living heterotrophic flagellates from intertidal sediments ofSaros Bay, Aegean Sea (Turkey). Acta Protozool. 51, 119-137.

Azovsky A.I., Tikhonenkov D.V. and Mazei Yu.A. 2016. An estimation ofthe global diversity and distribution of smallest eukaryotes: biogeography of marine benthic heterotrophic flagellates. Protist. 167, 411-424.

Bergesch M., Odebrecht C. and Moestrup 0. 2008. Nanoflagellates from coastal waters of Southern Brazil. Bot. Mar. 51, 35-50.

Boucaud-Camou E., 1967. Les Choanoflagel-lates des cotes de la Manche: I. Systematique. Bulletin de la societe linneenne de Normandie. 10, 191-209 (in French).

Butler H.G., Edworthy M.G. and Ellis-Evans J.C. 2000. Temporal plankton dynamics in an oligotrophic maritime Antarctic lakes. Freshwater Biology. 43, 215-230.

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

Cavalier-Smith T., Lewis R., Chao E.E., Oates B. and Bass D. 2009. Helkesimastix marina n. sp. (Cercozoa: Sainouroidea superfam. n.) a gliding zooflagellate of novel ultrastructure and unusual ciliary behavior. Protist. 160, 452-479.

Charubhun B. and Charubhun N. 2000. Biodiversity offreshwater protozoa in Thailand. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 34, 486-494.

Cienkowski L. 1881. An account of the White Sea excursion in 1880. Proc. St.-Petersb. Imp. Soc. Nat. 12, 130-171 (in Russian).

Ekebom J., Patterson D.J. and Vors N. 1995. Heterotrophic flagellates from coral reef sediments (Great Barier Reef, Australia). Arch. Protistenkd. 146, 251-272.

Ekelund F. and Patterson D.J. 1997. Some heterotrophic flagellates from a cultivated garden soil in Australia. Arch Protistenkd. 148, 561-479.

Finlay B.J. 1998. The global diversity of protozoa and other small species. Intern. J. Parasitol. 28, 29-48.

Finlay B.J., Esteban G.F. and Fenchel T. 1998. Protozoan diversity: converging estimates of the global number of free-living ciliate species. Protist. 149, 29-37.

Gerasimova E.A. and Plotnikov A.O. 2015. Diversity of amoeboid protists in saline water bodies of the Orenburg region. Vestnik OSU. 10 (185), 130-133 (in Russian).

Griessmann K. 1913. Über marine Flagellaten. Arch. Protistenkd. 32, 1-78 (in German).

Hausmann K., Hülsmann N., Polianski I., Schade S. and Weitere M. 2002. Composition of benthic protozoa communities along a depth transect in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Deep-Sea Research. 49, 1959-1970.

Howe A.T., Bass D., Scoble J.M., Lewis R., Vickerman K., Arndt H. and Cavalier-Smith T. 2011. Novel cultured protists identity deep-branching environmental DNA clades ofCercozoa: new genera Tremula, Micrometopion, Minimassisteria, Budifila, Peregrinia. Protist. 162, 332-372.

Ikävalko J. 1998. Further observations on flagellates within sea ice in Northern Bothnian Bay, the Baltic Sea. Polar Biol. 19, 323-329.

Jones E.E. 1974. Tre protozoa of Mobile Bay, Alabama. University of South Alabama, Monographs .1 (1).

Karpov S.A., Sogin M.L. and Silberman J.D. 2001. Rootlet homology, taxonomy, and phylogeny of bicosoecids based on 18S rRNA gene sequences. Protistology. 2, 34-48.

Kiss A.K., Acs E., Kiss K.T. and Torok J.K. 2008. Structure and seasonal dynamics of the protozoan community (heterotrophic flagellates, ciliates, amoeboid protozoa) in the plankton of a large river (River Danube, Hungary). Europ. J. Protistol. 45, 121-138.

Kopylov A.I., Kosolapov D.B., Romanenko A.V. and Degermendzhy A.G. 2002. Structure of planktonic microbial food web in a brackish stratified Siberian Lake. Aquatic Ecology. 36, 179-204.

Kopylov A.I., Mylnikov A.P. and Amgaabazar E. 2006. Heterotrophic flagellates in rivers and lakes of Mongolia: species composition, abundance, biomass, and production. Biologia Vnutrennikh Vod. 1, 57-66 (in Russian with English summary).

Larsen J. 1987. Algal studies of the Danish Wadden Sea. IV. A taxonomic study of the inter-stidial euglenoid flagellates. Nord. J. Bot. 7, 589607.

Larsen J. and Patterson D.J. 1990. Some flagellates (Protista) from tropical marine sediments. J. Nat. Hist. 24, 801-937.

Leadbeater B.S.C. 1972. Paraphysomonas cylicophora sp. nov., a marine species from the coast of Norway. Norw. J. Bot. 19, 179-185.

Leadbeater B.S.C. 1973. External morphology of some marine Choanoflagellates from the coast of Jugoslavia. Arch. Protistenk. 115, 234-252.

Leadbeater B.S.C. 1979. Developmental studies on the loricate choanoflagellate Stephanoeca diplocostata Ellis. II. Cell division and lorica assembly. Protoplasma. 98, 311-328.

Lee W.J. 2002. Some free-living heterotrophic flagellates from marine sediments of Inchon and Ganghwa Island, Korea. Korean J. Biol. Sci. 6, 125-143.

Lee W.J. 2006. Some free-living heterotrophic flagellates from marine sediments oftropical Australia. Ocean Sci. J. 41, 75-95.

Lee W.J. 2007. Free-living heterotrophic stra-menopile flagellates from Gippsland basin, SouthEastern Australia. Algae. 22, 23-29.

Lee W.J. 2008. Free-living heterotrophic eugle-nids from marine sediments of the Gippsland basin, Southern Australia. Marine Biology Research. 4, 333-349.

Lee W.J. 2015. Small free-living heterotrophic flagellates from marine sediments of Gippsland basin, South-Eastern Australia. Acta Protozool. 54, 53-76.

Lee W.J., Brandt S.M., Vmrs N. and Patterson D.J. 2003. Darwin's heterotrophic flagellates. Ophelia. 57, 63-98.

Lee W.J. and Patterson D.J. 1998. Diversity and geographical distribution of free-living heterotro-phic flagellates - analysis by PRIMER. Protist. 149, 229-243.

Lee W.J. and Patterson D.J. 2000. Heterotrophic flagellates (Protista) from marine sediments of Botany Bay, Australia. J. Nat. Hist. 34, 483-562.

Lee W.J., Simpson A.G.B. and Patterson D.J. 2005. Free-living heterotrophic flagellates from freshwater sites in Tasmania (Australia), a field survey. Acta Protozool. 44, 321-350.

Leonov M.M. 2010. Heliozoans (Heliozoa, Sarcodina, Protista) of fresh and marine waters of the European part of Russia: species composition, morphology, and distribution. Inland Water Biology. 3 (4), 244-355.

Leonov M.M. 2012. Species diversity and morphology of heliozoa in water bodies and watercourse of the European part of Russia. PhD thesis. Borok (in Russian).

Leonov M.M. and Mylnikov A.P. 2012. Centro-heliozoa from southern Karelia. Zool. Zhurn. 91 (5), 515-523 (in Russian with English summary).

Mikrjukov K.A. 1999. Interesting findings of heliozoan (Protista) in the Black Sea and Crimea: data on the similarity of sea ans freshwater fauna of these organisms. Rus. J. Zool. 3 (2), 240-249.

Mikrjukov K.A. 2002. Centrohelid heliozoans (Centroheliozoa). KMK Sci. Press, Moscow (in Russian with English summary).

Mikrjukov K.A. and Mylnikov A.P. 1998. The fine structure of a carnivorous multiflagellar protest, Multicilia marina Cienkowski, 1881 (flagellate incer-tae sedis). Europ. J. Protistol. 34, 391-401.

Moestrup 0. and Thomsen H.A. 1980. Preparations of shadow cast whole mounts. In: Handbook of Phycological Methods. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. pp. 385-390.

Moiseev E.V. 1980. Zooflagellates of the open part of the Black Sea. Eco-systems of the Black Sea pelagic. Nauka, Moskow, pp. 174-178 (in Russian).

Moriya M., Nakayama T. and Inouye I. 2000. Ultrastructure and 18S rDNA sequence analysis of Wobblia lunata gen. et sp. nov., a new heterotrophic flagellate (stramenopiles, insertae sedis). Protist. 151, 41-55

Mylnikov A.P. 1999. New brackish water amoeboid flagellates of the genus Amastigomonas (Apusomonadida, Protozoa). Zool. Zh. (Moscow). 78 (7), 771-777 (in Russian with English summary).

Nicholls K.H. 2012. Zoelucasa sablensis n. gen. et n. sp. (Cercozoa, incertae sedis), a new scale-covered flagellate from marine sandy shores. Acta Protozool. 51, 113-117.

Nikolaev S.I., Berney C., Petrov N.B., Mylnikov A.P., Farhni J.F. and Pawlowski J. 2006. Phylogenetic position of Multicilia marina and the evolution of Amoebozoa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56, 1449-1458.

Nitsche F., Weitere M., Scheckenbach F., Hausmann K., Wylezich C. and Arndt H. 2007. Deep sea records of Choanoflagellates with a description of two new species. Acta Protozool. 46, 99-106.

Norris R.E. 1965. Neustonic marine Craspe-domonadales (Choanoflagellates) from Washington and California. J. Protozool. 12, 589-602.

Ostroumov A.A. 1917. On a new heliozoan species (Acanthocystis wiasemskii) from marine plankton. Trudy Karadagsk. Biol. St. im. T.I. Vyazemskogo. 1, 62-65.

Patterson D.J. and Fenchel T. 1985. Insights into the evolution of Heliozoa (Protozoa, Sarcodina) as provided by ultrastructural studies on a new species of flagellate from the genus Pteridomonas. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 24, 381-403.

Patterson, D.J., Nygaard K., Steinberg G. and Turley C.M. 1993. Heterotrophic flagellates and other protists associated with oceanic detritus throughout the water column in the mid North Atlantic. J. Mar. Biol. As. U.K. 73, 67-95.

Patterson D.J. and Simpson A.G.B. 1996. Heterotrophic flagellates from coastal marine and hypersaline sediments in Western Australia. Europ. J. Protistol. 32, 423-448.

Pomeroy L. 1974. The ocean's food web, a changing paradigm. BioScience. 24, 499-504.

Porter K.G., Sherr E.B., Sherr B.F., Pace M. and Sanders R.W. 1985. Protozoa in planktonic food webs. Protozool. 32 (3), 409-415.

Preisig H.R. and Hibberd D.J. 1982. Ultrastructure and taxonomy of Paraphysomonas (Chry-sophyceae) and related genera. 2. Nord. J. Bot. 2, 601-638.

Prokina K.I. and Mylnikov A.P. 2017. Heterotrophic flagellates of Sphagnum bogs and lakes in Usman Pine Forest, Voronezh oblast, Russia. Inland Water Biology. 10 (2), 182-191.

Prokina K.I., Mylnikov A.P. and Zelalem W.

2017a. First data on heterotrophic flagellates and heliozoans of Ethiopia. Zool. Zh. (Moscow). 95 (2), 127—143 (in Russian with English summary).

Prokina K.I., Mylnikov A.P., Galanina O.V. and Philippov D.A. 2017b. First data on heterotrophic flagellates in the mires of Arkhangelsk oblast', Russia. Zool. Zh. (Moscow). 96 (5), 499-510 (in Russian with English summary).

Romanov R. 2005. The findings of rare heterotrophic algae species in rivers and lakes ofSouth-west Siberia (Upper Ob' Basin, Russia). Turczaninowia. 8 (3), 48-59 (in Russian with English summary).

Schroeckh S., Lee W.J. and Patterson D.J. 2003. Free-living heterotrophic euglenids from freshwater sites in mainland Australia. Hydrobiologia. 493, 131-166.

Scoble J.M. and Cavalier-Smith T. 2014. Scale evolution in Paraphysomonadida (Chrysophyceae): sequence phylogeny and revised taxonomy of Paraphysomonas, new genus Clathromonas, and 25 new species. Europ. J. Protistol. 50, 551-592.

Shatilovich A.V., Mylnikov A.P. and Stoopin D.V. 2010. The fauna and morphology of hete-rotrophic flagellates and heliozoans from late Pleistocene fossil rodent burrows (Kolyma Lowland). Zool. Zh. (Moscow). 89, 387-397.

Siemensma F.J. and Roijackers R.M.M. 1988. A study of new and little-known Acanthocystid heliozoeans, and a proposed division of the genus Acanthocystis (Actinopoda, Heliozoa). Arch. Protistenkd. 135, 197-212.

Soto-Liebe K., Collantes G. and Kuznar J. 2007. New records of marine Choanoflagellates of the Chilean coast. Invest. Mar., Valparaiso. 35, 113-120.

Sherr B.F., Sherr E.B. and Berman T. 1982. Decomposition of organic detritus: A selective role for microflagellate protozoa. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27, 765-769.

Stensdotter-Blomberg U. 1998. Factors controlling pelagic populations of ciliates and heliozoans -late summer investigations in an acidic lake before and after liming. J. Plankton Res. 20, 423-442.

Takamura N., Shen Yu. and Xie P. 2000. Species richness of protozoa in Japanese lakes. Limnology. 1, 91-106.

Thomsen H.A. 1975. An ultrastructural survey of the chrysophycean genus Paraphysomonas under natural conditions. Br. Phycol. J. 10, 113-127.

Thomsen H.A., Buck K.R. and Chavez F.P. 1991. Choanoflagellates of the Central California waters: taxonomy, morphology and species assemblages. Ophelia. 33, 131-164.

Tikhonenkov D.V. 2006. Fauna, morphology and community structure offree-living heterotrophic flagellates from different types of freshwater and marine habitats. PhD thesis. Borok (in Russian).

Tikhonenkov D.V. 2009. Benthic heterotrophic flagellates from the Red Sea littoral (the gulf of Suez, Egypt). Zool. Zh. (Moscow). 88 (11), 1291-1297 (in Russian with English summary).

Tikhonenkov D.V., Burkovsky I.V. and Mazei Yu.A. 2015. Free-living heterotrophic flagellates of the sublittoral and bathyal zones of the Kara Sea. Rus. J. Mar. Biol. 41 (3), 194-202.

Tikhonenkov D.V. and Mazei Y.A. 2013. Distribution of benthic heterotrophic flagellates along salinity gradient: correlation between active and cryptic species diversity in the White Sea estuary. Usp. Sovrem. Biol. 133 (2), 178-190 (in Russian with English summary).

Tikhonenkov D.V., Mazei Yu.A. and Embulaeva E.A. 2010. Effect of ecosystem type on soil hetero-trophic flagellate communities under forest-steppe conditions. Protistology. 6, 188-203.

Tikhonenkov D.V., Mylnikov A.P., Gong Y.C., Feng W.S. and Mazie Yu. 2012. Heterotrophic flagellates from freshwater and soil habitats in subtropical China (Wuhan Area, Hubei Province). Acta Protozool. 51, 63-77.

Tong S.M. 1993. Heterotrophic flagellates in Southampton water. PhD thesis.

Tong S.M. 1997a. Choanoglagellates in Southampton Water, including the description of three new species. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 77, 929-958.

Tong S.M. 1997b. Heterotrophic flagellates and other protists from Southampton water, UK. Ophelia. 47, 71-131.

Tong S.M. 1997c. Heterotrophic flagellates from the water column in Shark bay, Western Australia. Marine Biology. 128, 517-536.

Tong S.M., Nygaard K., Bernard C., Vors N. and Patterson D.J. 1998. Heterotrophic flagellates from the water column in Port Jackson, Sydney, Australia. Europ. J. Protistol. 34, 162-194.

Tong S.M., Vors N. and Patterson D.J. 1997. Heterotrophic flagellates, Centrohelid heliozoan and filose amoebae from marine and fresh water sites in the Antarctic. Polar Biol. 18, 91-106.

Valkanov A. 1940. Die Heliozoan und Pro-teomyxien. Artbestand und sonstige kritische Bemerkungen. Arch. Protistenkd. 93, 225-254 (in German).

Valkanov A. 1970. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Protozoen des Schwarzen Meeres. Zool. Anz. 84 (3/4), 241-290 (in German).

Vetrova Z. I. 1980. Colorless euglenid algae of the Ukraine. Kiev: Nauk. Dumka. 184 p. (in Russian).

Vors N. 1992. Heterotrophic amoebae, flagellates and heliozoan from the Tvärminne area, gulf of Finland, in 1988 - 1990. Ophelia. 36, 1-109.

Vors N. 1993a. Heterotrophic amoebae, flagellates and heliozoan from Arctic marine waters (North West Territories, Canada and West Greenland). Polar Biol. 13, 113-126.

Vors N. 1993b. Marine heterotrophic amoebae, flagellates and heliozoan from Belize (Central America) and Tenerife (Canary Island), with descriptions of new species, Luffisphaera bulbochaete n. sp., L. longihastisn. sp., L. turriformisn. sp., and

Paulinella intermedia n. sp. J. Eukar. Microbiology. 40, 272-287.

Vors N., Buck K.R., Chavez F.P., Eikrem W., Hansen L.E., 0stengaard J.B. and Thomsen H.A. 1995. Nanoplankton of the equatorial Pacific with emphasis on the heterotrophic protists. Deep-Sea Research II. 42 (2-3), 585-602.

Wujek D.E. and Elsner P.R. 1992. Pterocystis ebelii, a new species of Heliozoa from India. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 111, 143-148.

Zlatogursky V.V. 2010. Three new freshwater species of centrohelid heliozoans: Acanthocystis crescent sp. nov., A. kirilli sp. nov., and Choanocystis minima sp. nov. Europ. J. Protistol. 46, 159-163.

Address for correspondence: Kristina I. Prokina. I.D. Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters of Russian Academy of Sciences, 109, Borok, Nekouzskiy district, Yaroslavskaya Oblast', 142742, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.