Научная статья на тему 'ECONOMIC IMPACT OF EDIBLE OFFAL REJECTION AT EL-QUREIN SLAUGHTERHOUSE, EGYPT'

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF EDIBLE OFFAL REJECTION AT EL-QUREIN SLAUGHTERHOUSE, EGYPT Текст научной статьи по специальности «Животноводство и молочное дело»

CC BY
0
0
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
slaughterhouse / carcass / economic loss / offal rejection / parasitic diseases

Аннотация научной статьи по животноводству и молочному делу, автор научной работы — Refaat Ras, Abdallah Fikry A. Mahmoud, Abd El-Salam E. Hafez, Emad Eldin Ibrahim Ghazaly, Rania Helmy M. Shata

The thorough examination of animal carcasses and organs intended for human consumption is crucial for food safety. However, it is not always conducted adequately due to time constraints during the slaughter process. A cross-sectional study was undertaken to identify the key reasons for the rejection of edible offal in slaughtered animals at El-Qurein slaughterhouse in Sharkia province, Egypt, and to evaluate the associated economic losses during the period from August, 2020 till July, 2021. The study examined 1,218 organs (406 livers, 406 lungs, and 406 hearts) from various animals (cattle, buffaloes, camels, sheep and goats), among which 138 organs (78 livers, 38 lungs, and 22 hearts) were rejected, primarily due to lesions caused by Cysticercus ovis, fascioliasis, Cysticercus tenuicollis, pneumonia, and hydatid cysts. The financial loss at the slaughterhouse due to organs rejection over the twelve-month period totaled 1,113,905.24 Egyptian pounds (equivalent to 71,865 USD). The high frequency of meat rejection and resulting financial impact exceeded the region’s local revenue. This study highlights the persistent prevalence of parasitic diseases, resulting in significant detrimental economic repercussions in Sharkia province, Egypt. Furthermore, the present work underscores the necessity for the development of an effective control program addressing the causes of meat rejection in the region.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «ECONOMIC IMPACT OF EDIBLE OFFAL REJECTION AT EL-QUREIN SLAUGHTERHOUSE, EGYPT»

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2024-9-2-145-152

Received 08.04.2024 Accepted in revised 19.06.2024 Accepted for publication 20.06.2024

Available online at https://www.meatjournal.ru/jour Original scientific article Open Access

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF EDIBLE OFFAL REJECTION AT EL-QUREIN SLAUGHTERHOUSE, EGYPT

Refaat Ras12, Abdallah Fikry A. Mahmoud3, Abd El-Salam E. Hafez3, Emad Eldin Ibrahim Ghazaly3, Rania Helmy M. Shata3, Ahmed S. El-tahlawy3*

1 Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Badr University in Cairo, Cairo, Badr City, Egypt 2 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt 3 Food Hygiene, Safety, and Technology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

Keywords: slaughterhouse, carcass, economic loss, offal rejection, parasitic diseases Abstract

The thorough examination of animal carcasses and organs intended for human consumption is crucial for food safety. However, it is not always conducted adequately due to time constraints during the slaughter process. A cross-sectional study was undertaken to identify the key reasons for the rejection of edible offal in slaughtered animals at El-Qurein slaughterhouse in Sharkia province, Egypt, and to evaluate the associated economic losses during the period from August, 2020 till July, 2021. The study examined 1,218 organs (406 livers, 406 lungs, and 406 hearts) from various animals (cattle, buffaloes, camels, sheep and goats), among which 138 organs (78 livers, 38 lungs, and 22 hearts) were rejected, primarily due to lesions caused by Cysticercus ovis, fascioliasis, Cysticercus tenuicollis, pneumonia, and hydatid cysts. The financial loss at the slaughterhouse due to organs rejection over the twelve-month period totaled 1,113,905.24 Egyptian pounds (equivalent to 71,865 USD). The high frequency of meat rejection and resulting financial impact exceeded the region's local revenue. This study highlights the persistent prevalence of parasitic diseases, resulting in significant detrimental economic repercussions in Sharkia province, Egypt. Furthermore, the present work underscores the necessity for the development of an effective control program addressing the causes of meat rejection in the region.

For citation: Ras, R., Mahmoud, A.F.A., Hafez, A. El-S.E., Ghazaly, E.E.I., Shata, R.H.M., El-tahlawy, A.S. (2024). Economic impact of edible offal rejection at El-Qurein slaughterhouse, Egypt. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing, 9(2), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.21323/2414-438X-2024-9-2-145-152

Acknowledgements:

The authors express gratitude for the support received from the Department of Food Hygiene, Safety, and Technology at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University.

Introduction

The sustainable rise in the global number of human population necessitates a corresponding proportional increase in the production of animal-derived food products, fostering a balanced growth in both developed and developing countries [1]. In Egypt, cattle, camels, sheep, and goats are the vital sources of red meat, offering crucial protein for human diets [2,3]. Acknowledged for its nutrient richness, red meat contains high-quality proteins, trace elements, and vitamins, contributing significantly to dietary balance [4]. Additionally, the edible offal like livers, kidneys, and tongues despite their lower consumption rates compared to meat, hold the considerable economic value and gastronomic appeal [5]. However, persistent challenges arise from infectious diseases and climate change, thus hindering the meat industry's efforts to maintain red meat's dietary importance [6].

Meat and edible offal often harbor various contaminants, including pathogens, posing health risks and potential negative impacts [7,8]. Widespread bacteria in food of animal origin pose transmission risks to humans during meat handling, preparation, cooking and consumption, as well as during rejection procedures at the slaughterhouse

[9]. Diseases like bovine tuberculosis, and parasitic infections such as cysticercosis, hydatidosis, and fascioliasis further threaten human health and meat safety [10,11,12, 13,14]. Consequently, ensuring meat safety and hygiene is a critical concern for all parties concerned, including producers, distributors, and consumers.

In developing countries, the slaughterhouses play a crucial role in providing data on disease prevalence, public health importance, and financial losses due to organ rejection [15,16]. Stringent meat inspection regulations, that include pre- and post-slaughter analyses, are vital for protecting consumers from foodborne hazards [17,18]. Veterinarians conduct thorough examinations to assess carcass quality and safety, addressing potential health risks [19]. However, certain diseases, like fasciolosis, hydatidosis, and cysticercosis, inflict significant economic losses through partial organ or carcass rejection, impacting both public health and the economy [20].

In Egypt, numerous studies have been conducted at various slaughterhouses across various regions of the country, with a primary focus on the epidemiological aspects of specific disease conditions such as parasitic and bacterial diseas-

Copyright © 2024, Ras et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

es [21,22]. Nevertheless, there is currently a lack of available data on the primary causes of rejection and the corresponding economic losses in Sharkia province slaughterhouses in Egypt. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to identify the major causes of total edible organs (lungs, liver, and heart) rejection and to assess the associated direct financial losses as a result of total edible organs rejection at El-Qurein slaughterhouse in Sharkia province, Egypt.

Objects and methods

Samples collection and preparation

The present research was carried out at El-Qurein slaughterhouse in Sharkia province, Egypt at the period from August, 2020 till July, 2021. Sharkia province is situated in the eastern region of the Nile delta in Egypt, with geographical coordinates ranging from approximately 30.7 °N to 31.63 °E. Furthermore, it has the second-largest agricultural area within the country, following Beheira province, boasting a cultivated plant area covering 824,098 acres.

Research project

The cross-sectional study was carried out to determine the major causes of lungs, livers, and heart rejection and to evaluate the direct financial losses. In total 220 randomly selected cattle, in particular: 89 buffaloes, 40 camels, 47 sheep, and 10 goats were subjected to ante-mortem and postmortem examinations following the guidelines outlined in Ministerial Decision No. 517/1986 issued by the Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation (MALR) [23].

Antemortem inspection

All animals were observed while resting and moving within the lairage pens. Furthermore, their general behavior, visual cleanliness, symptoms of diseases, nutritional status, and any other irregularities were monitored according to standard ante-mortem inspection procedures. Animals deemed suitable for slaughter, being free from any diseases or abnormalities, were then sent for slaughter [24].

Postmortem meat inspection

The thorough postmortem examination was carried out, involving visual inspection, palpation, and systematic incision of each internal organ, with particular attention given to the liver, lungs, and heart, in order to detect cysts, various types of adult parasites, and any other abnormalities.

Assessment of financial loss

As local visceral organs such as lungs, livers, and hearts were assessed for rejection, only the direct losses associated with rejection were calculated. Meanwhile, the average prevailing market prices of each organ were determined by surveying the prices in the shops of the various butchers who purchase the meat from the slaughterhouse. These variables were then input into the following formula to determine the annual financial loss resulting from rejection of the organs deemed unsuitable for human consumption due to gross pathological lesions [25].

Thus, the estimated annual economic loss (EL) due to organ/carcass rejection from local market was defined by the following formula:

EL = S x C x R (1)

rx oy oz

Where,

Srx — annual animal slaughter rate of the slaughterhouse;

Coy — average cost of each liver/lung/heart/carcass;

Rz — rejection rates of liver/lung/heart/carcass.

Ethics statement

The search protocol has been revised and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Zagazig University, Egypt, with an approval number (ZU-IACUC/2F/286/2022).

Statistical analysis

The data of infected organs were analyzed with Chi-square (y2) tests using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software version 21. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Rejection rate of edible organs of the slaughtered

animals

According to the findings outlined in the Table 1, a total of 1,218 edible organs were examined, consisting of 406 livers, 406 lungs, and 406 hearts sourced from various slaughtered animals including cattle, buffaloes, camels, sheep, and goats. Among these organs, 138 were deemed unsuitable for consumption, with 78 livers, 38 lungs, and 22 hearts being rejected. This resulted in rejection rates of 0.19 (19%), 0.09 (9%), and 0.05 (5%) for rejected livers, lungs, and hearts, respectively, attributed to various lesions.

Table 1. Rejection rate of edible organs of animals slaughtered at El-Qurein slaughterhouse during 2020 and 2021

Animal NO. OI examined edible organs No. of rejected edible Organs Rejection rate, (%)

species Liver Lung Heart Liver Lung Heart Liver Lung Heart

Cattle 220 220 220 52 3 5 0.24 (24%) 0.01 (1%) 0.02 (2%)

Buffaloes 89 89 89 11 26 2 0.12 (12%) 0.29 (29%) 0.02 (2%)

Camels 40 40 40 2 9 2 0.05 (5%) 0.23 (23%) 0.05 (5%)

Sheep 47 47 47 12 0 13 0.26 (26%) 0.00 0.28 (28%)

Goats 10 10 10 1 0 0 0.10 (10%) 0.00 0.00

Total 406 406 406 78 38 22 0.19 (19%) 0.09 (9%) 0.05 (5%)

The recent study indicates that there were no reasons for rejection noted during the antemortem inspection of the animals prior to slaughter. However, all rejections were attributed to diseases identified during postmortem

inspection. Table 2 provides a summary of the postmortem findings from the animals inspected and slaughtered at El-Qurein slaughterhouse in the years 2020 and 2021.

In the investigated slaughterhouse, out of a total of 220 cattle slaughtered, the rejection rates for liver, lung, and heart were 0.24 (24%), 0.01 (1%), and 0.02 (2%), respectively. According to the study, the highest proportion of liver rejection was caused by fasciolosis, accounting for 20.45%, while abscesses were the least common cause, accounting at 3.18%. Cysticercus bovis was identified as the primary cause for heart rejection, accounting for 2.27%, and hydatidosis was the leading cause for lung rejection, with a portion of 0.91%. Additionally, this research indicated that the incidence of liver rejection in buffaloes was 0.12 (12%), while for lungs and hearts, it was 0.29 (29%) and 0.02 (2%), respectively. The study identified fasciolo-sis as the primary cause of liver rejection, accounting for 7.87% of cases. Pneumonia was identified as the predominant reason for lung rejection, constituting 15.73% of cases, while pericarditis was the leading cause of heart rejection, representing 2.25% of cases.

Moreover, the primary reasons for rejecting the camel edible organs such as the liver, lung, and heart were hydatid cyst and abscess (2.5% each), hydatid cyst (12.5%), and Cysticercus dromedary (5%), respectively.

Regarding sheep carcasses, the primary reasons for liver, lung, and heart rejection were Cysticercus tenuicollis, accounting for 17.02% of liver rejections, and Cysticercus ovis, responsible for 27.66% of heart rejections. Lungs showed no signs of lesions.

Concerning goat carcasses, Cysticercus tenuicollis (10%) was the primary reason for liver rejection, whereas the lungs and heart showed no abnormalities.

The rejection rate of cattle liver was significantly higher than lung and heart (P-values < 0.05). Moreover, the rejection rate of liver in goats was significantly higher than lung and heart (P-values < 0.05).

Causes of liver rejection

In the recent research, it was observed that the liver manifested the most significant number of abnormal conditions, totaling 78 cases. Among the various animals studied, cows had 52 liver lesions, buffaloes had 11, camels had 2, sheep had 12, and goats had 1. The main reasons for liver rejection were identified as fasciolosis (accounting for 28.32%), Cysticercus tenuicollis (27.02%), necrosis (6.55%), abscess (3.62%), and hydatid cyst (2.5%). Lower obtained rate of fascioliasis in cattle was recorded by Tembo and Nonga [26] in Tanzania (4.5%) and Assefa and Tesfay [27] in Ethiopia (9.26%). Moreover, in the study of Jaja et al. [28], the prevalence of fascioliasis among cattle carcasses in South Africa was equal to 5.95%, 4.48%, and 2.7% for the years 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively. While, according to Denbarga et al. [29], Mohammed et al. [16] in Ethiopia, Cadmus and Adesokan [30] in Western Nigeria, and Dukundane et al. [31] in Gicumbi districts of Rwanda,

the higher prevalence of fasciolosis in cattle carcasses with percentages of 86.4%, 36.06%, 29.44%, and 90%, respectively was noted.

Fasciolosis significantly contributes to the onset of various liver conditions in buffaloes, such as bile duct hyperplasia, hepatitis, and fatty degeneration. The prevalence of fascioliasis in Egyptian slaughterhouses is notable, likely due to the abundance of larvae and favoring climatic conditions. This parasitic infection is widespread across several African nations and typically doesn't result in mortality in livestock. However, it does lead to diminished productivity in animals and the discard of infected livers in slaughterhouses [32].

Concerning Cysticercus tenuicollis, lower rates of 7.81%, 5.73%, and 0.71% were observed in sheep liver through the investigation of Bayu et al. [33], Mandefro et al. [34], and Dejene et al. [35] in Ethiopia, respectively. The presence of Cysticercus tenuicollis is linked to the extent of pasture contamination caused by unrestricted dogs' movement and the husbandry practices as well as grazing habits of these animals. These factors play a role in facilitating the transmission cycle among ruminants, dogs, and other wild canines [33].

Causes of lung rejection

The combined total of 38 lesions were identified in the lungs. Specifically, cows had 3 lesions, buffaloes had 26 lesions, and camels had 9 lesions. The primary reasons for lung rejection included pneumonia (20.73%), hydatid cysts (17.9%), tuberculosis (9.44%), and abscesses (5%). These results were nearly similar to the previous studies conducted by Mummed and Webb [36], and Cadmus and Adesokan [30] who documented that the prevalence of pneumonia cases among cattle carcasses in Ethiopia and Western Nigeria was equal to 22.68% and 21.38%, respectively. Lower prevalence of pneumonia cases was detected in Nigeria by Raji et al. [15] with a rate of 8.79%. In another study performed by Jaja et al. [37], lower rates of pneumonia (1.09%, 2.21%, and 0.77%) were recorded at three Namib-ian slaughterhouses. In contrast to that, Abdel-Rassol et al. [38] showcased a greater proportion of 47.4% in Egypt.

Hydatidosis prevalence rates vary across various regions, as evidenced by studies conducted in Tanzania by Tembo and Nonga [26], in Kenya by Kere et al. [39], in Tanzania by Komba et al. [40], and in Egypt by Abd El-Aziz et al. [41] who reported lower incidence rates of 3.1%, 5.3%, 0.04%, and 0.038%, respectively. In contrast, Kerala et al. [19] found a significantly higher prevalence in Southern Ethiopia (23.04%), along with Denbarga et al. [29] (82.5%) and Mulatu et al. [42] (20.05%) in other parts of Ethiopia. This variance in occurrence could be attributed to factors such as geographical location, the population of dogs, and the standards of the livestock sanitation [43,44].

Concerning lung tuberculosis prevalence, Okeke et al. [45] found a comparable bovine tuberculosis rate of 9.1% in Nigeria. Furthermore, in Tanzania, Komba et al. [40]

detected a lower prevalence of 1.87%. Moreover, Shitaye et al. [46] reported that the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in slaughterhouses across various regions of Ethiopia varied from 3.5% to 5.2%. In another study conducted by Woldemariyam et al. [47], the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle carcasses slaughtered at the Debre Birhan municipality slaughterhouse in Ethiopia was recorded at 4.7%. Alternatively, Dechassa [48] reported a greater incidence of bovine tuberculosis at rates of 24.7% in Ethiopia, while Cleaveland et al. [49] observed a rate of 20% in Tanzania.

Causes of heart rejection

The combined heart lesions observed in cows, buffaloes, camels, and sheep totaled 22 cases, with respective occurrences of 5, 2, 2, and 13. The primary reasons for heart rejection were cysticercosis, accounting for 34.93% of cases, and pericarditis, which constituted 2.25% of cases. In comparison with the obtained results, a decreased occurrence of cysticercosis (0.27%) was identified at the Adigrat municipal slaughterhouse in the northern part of Ethiopia by As-sefa and Tesfay [27], while EDO et al. [50] reported a lower rate (0.9%) in Adama municipal slaughterhouse, Ethiopia. Furthermore, Dyab et al. [51] documented a prevalence of 12.6% in El-Minia governorate slaughterhouses, Egypt, between June 2017 and May 2018. On the other side, Aziz et

Table 2. Major causes of rejection of each edible organs of the animals slaughtered at El-Qurein slaughterhouse during 2020 and 2021.

Livestock species Rejected organs Disease Infection rate (%)

Liver (52/220) Fascioliasis (45/220) 20.45%

Necrosis (7/220) 3.18%

Cattle Lung (3/220) Hydatid cyst (2/220) Tuberculosis (1/220) 0.91% 0.45%

Heart (5/220) Cysticercus bovis (5/220) 2.27%

Fascioliasis (7/89) 7.87%

Liver(11/89) Necrosis (3/89) Abscesses (1/89) 3.37% 1.12%

Buffaloes Pneumonia (14 /89) 15.73%

Lung (26/89) Localized Tuberculosis (8/89) Hydatid cysts (4/89) 8.99% 4.49%

Heart (2/89) Pericarditis (2/89) 2.25%

Liver (2/40) Hydatid cysts (1/40) Abscesses (1/40) 2.5% 2.5%

Camels Abscesses (2/40) 5.0%

Lung (9/40) Hydatid cysts (5/40) Pneumonia (2/40) 12.5% 5.0%

Heart (2/40) Cysticercus dromedary (2/40) 5.0%

Liver(12/47) Cysticercus tenuicollis (8/47) 17.02%

Sheep Necrosis (4/47) 8.51%

Lung (0/47) 0 0

Heart (13/47) Cysticercus ovis (13/47) 27.66%

Liver (1/10) Cysticercus tenuicollis (1/10) 10%

Goats Lung (0/10) 0 0

Heart (0/10) 0 0

al. [52] conducted a study in various slaughterhouses located in Sohag governorate, Egypt, which revealed a higher prevalence rate of 64.43%. Similarly, Rabi and Jegede [53] observed a higher prevalence rate of cysticercosis in the heart, reaching 66%, within the Kano slaughterhouse, Nigeria. As for pericarditis, a lower incidence rate (1.6%) was reported by EDO et al. [50] on the basis of bovine carcasses slaughtered at Adama municipal slaughterhouse, Ethiopia. However, other studies by Mummed and Webb [36], Ahmed et al. [54], Raji et al. [15], and Madzingira et al. [55] observed higher prevalence rates of pericarditis (4.59%, 8%, 17.06%, and 19.7%) in various regions including Ethiopia, Egypt, Nigeria, and Namibia, respectively.

Financial losses due to rejections

The total economic impact resulting from the rejection of meat over the span of a year was assessed to be 1,113,905.24 Egyptian pounds, equivalent to USD 71,865 as detailed in the Table 3. In a study performed by Ciui et al. [56], the combined monetary losses stemming from the rejection of edible parts over a two-year period were calculated to be EUR4,021,717.3 at a cattle slaughterhouse located in southeastern Germany. In addition, Mohammed and Maky [11] undertook a study that lasted for two years (2017-2018) in both northern and southern regions of Egypt. Their investigation revealed a financial deficit of 4,529,010 Egyptian pounds (USD 383,063) attributable to meat rejection across three slaughterhouses. The primary factors leading to meat rejection were tuberculosis, icterus, pneumonia, hydronephrosis, parasitic cysts, and fasciolia-sis. The economic impact observed in this study surpasses the results reported in a previous study conducted in Egypt by Ahmed et al. [54], where they estimated an annual financial loss of 36,480 Egyptian pounds resulting from the rejection of organs from slaughtered male cattle at the Is-mailia slaughterhouse. Moreover, Yibar et al. [1] undertook a survey within the slaughterhouses located in Bursa province, Turkey, revealing a financial deficit of USD 245,483 due to the rejection of organs and carcasses over a span of six months in two slaughterhouses. Hydatidosis and fas-ciolosis served as the primary factors for organ rejection, whereas tuberculosis and jaundice were identified as the primary causes leading to carcass rejection. Furthermore, Amuamuta et al. [57] conducted the research at the Ba-hir Dar municipal slaughterhouse in Ethiopia, determining that the rejection of liver and lung tissues resulted into a substantial economic loss amounting to USD 9,257.914. Primary reasons for rejection included fasciolosis and hy-datidosis, which inflicted significant economic losses due to their prevalence. Furthermore, a yearly financial deficit amounting to USD 11,155.52 linked to zoonotic meta-cestodes found in cattle slaughtered at Yabello municipal slaughterhouse in Ethiopia during the timeframe spanning December 2017 to March 2018 was documented by Bey-ene and Hiko [58], where Cysticercus bovis and hydatidosis were the predominant causes of organ rejection. Moreover,

Table 3. Rejection rates, price, and annual financial loss of rejected organs of the livestock slaughtered at El-Qurein slaughterhouse during 2020 and 2021.

a si ^ Annual

•| pR 1 J t«a loss

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

S estimation

& 2 -<-3 2 (EL) Cattle liver 8 200 1600 0.24 1,849 710,016

Buffalo liver 8 Q 200 ЛЛП 1600 1 ¿лл 0.12 Л ПС 143 1 1f\Q 27,456 1 "ZiZ ¿лп

Camel liver Ovine liver 8 1.2 л Û 200 210 О 1 л 1600 252 1 QQ 0.05 0.26 Л 1 л 1,/08 47 1 л 136,640 3,079.44 1 QQ

Caprine liver Cattle lung 0.9 8 Q 210 60 189 480 л оп 0.10 0.01 л щ 10 1,849 1 189 8,875.2 1 о nnc с.

Buffalo lung Camel lung 8 8 1 л 60 60 480 480 0.29 0.23 Л ЛП 143 1,708 Л'7 19,905.6 188,563.2 л

Ovine lung Caprine lung 1.2 1.2 л с 60 60 /2 72 1 СП 0.00 0.00 л лл 47 10 1 Q Л(\ 0 0 С С АН

Cattle heart Buffalo heart 2.5 2.5 о с 60 60 150 150 1 сл 0.02 0.02 Л ПС 1,849 143 1 1f\Q 5,547 429 1 О Q1 Л

Camel heart Ovine heart 2.5 0.5 60 60 150 30 0.05 0.28 1,708 47 12,810 394.8

^imcuctUL u.j Total estimated loss OU JV U.UU 1U V 1,113,905.24 EGP (71,865 USD)

(a) Price: Average price of organs at the local market (Egyptian pound/kg);

(b) Cost (Coy): Average cost of organs at the local market (Egyptian pound), calculated as Average weight x Price; (c) Rejection rate (Roz): The proportion of organs rejected during inspection; (d) Annual slaughter rate (Srx): The number of animal species slaughtered annually at El-Qurein slaughterhouse; (EL) Annual loss estimation: The financial loss due to rejected organs, calculated as Annual slaughter rate x Cost x Rejection rate.

1 US dollar was equal to 15.50 Egyptian pounds

Abd Elaziz et al. [41] reported financial losses amounting to approximately EGP 11,712.5 for fascioliasis, EGP

32,940.0 for cysticercosis, and EGP 2,410 for hydatidosis, resulting from the rejection of liver and lung tissues at a local Egyptian slaughterhouse situated in Cairo governorate. Differences in economic losses across the studies may stem from the variations in factors such as livestock numbers, disease occurrence rates, estimation methods, the scope of loss items analyzed, disparities in livestock productivity and market prices.

Conclusion

Substantial financial losses have been incurred to the Egyptian slaughterhouses due to various pathological conditions. The research highlights fascioliasis, parasitic infections, and pneumonia as the predominant ailments significantly impacting the Egyptian economy. It's evident that implementing preventative measures such as regular administration of anti-parasitic drugs and stringent monitoring of sanitation protocols, especially in Sharkia province, is imperative. Ensuring the thorough meat inspection and proper disposal of rejected meat are essential for safeguarding of the public health. Focus should be directed towards dealing with frequently identified illnesses in the slaughterhouses. Implementing the anti-parasite monitoring programs at farms is crucial for minimizing the risk of infectious diseases spreading and reducing financial losses. Furthermore, the construction of well-equipped slaughterhouses and comprehensive training for the slaughterhouse staff are the essential steps. Finally, more research is needed for better understanding the causes of pathological findings, particularly at the slaughterhouse level, to enhance our understanding of the zoonotic risks posed to the consumers.

Item

a s

¡Я

us

о и

REFERENCES

1. Yibar, A., Selcuk, O., Senlik, B. (2015). Major causes of organ/carcass condemnation and financial loss estimation in animals slaughtered at two abattoirs in Bursa Province, Turkey. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 118(1), 28-35. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.11.012

2. Morshdy, A.E.M.A., El Bayomi, R.M., Abd El Galil, G.M., Mahmoud, A.F.A. (2018). Heavy metal concentrations and their risk assessment in marketed slaughtered animals in Sharkia governorate, Egypt. Slovenian Veterinary Research, 55(20), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.26873/svr-635-2018

3. Morshdy, A. E. M. A., El-Tahlawy, A. S., Hafez, A. E., Mahmoud, A. F. A., El-Bayomi, R. M., Hussein, M. A. (2022). Evaluation of the hygienic status at El-Qurein abattoir in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Zagazig Veterinary Journal, 50(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.21608/zvjz.2022.121512.1172

4. Pighin, D., Pazos, A., Chamorro, V., Paschetta, F., Cunzo-lo, S., Godoy, F. et al. (2016). A contribution of beef to human health: A review of the role of the animal production systems. The Scientific World Journal, 2016, Article 8681491. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8681491

5. Mahmoud, A.F.A., Ikenaka, Y., Yohannes, Y.B., Darwish, W.S., Eldaly, E.A., Morshdy, A.E.M.A. et al. (2016). Distribution and health risk assessment of organo chlorine pesticides (OCPs) residue in edible cattle tissues from northeastern part of Egypt: High accumulation level of OCPs in tongue. Chemosphere, 144, 1365-1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/jj.chemosphere.2015.10.016

6. Garcla-Dlez, J., Saraiva, S., Moura, D., Grispoldi, L., Cenci-Goga, B. T., Saraiva, C. (2023). The importance of the slaughterhouse in surveilling animal and public health: A systematic review. Veterinary Sciences, 10(2), Article 167. https://doi. org/10.3390/vetsci10020167

7. Mahmoud, A.F.A., Darwish, W.S., Morshdy, A.E.M.A., Eldaly, E.A., Ikenaka, Y., Ishizuka, M. (2013). Determination of organo chlorine pesticides (OCPs) in the edible offal of Egyptian buffalo. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 61 (Suppl), S58- S63.

8. Lianou, A., Panagou, E.Z., Nychas, G.J.E. (2023). Meat safety — I foodborne pathogens and other biological issues. Chapter in a book: Lawrie's meat science. Woodhead Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85408-5.00015-7

9. Abuseir, S. (2019). Major Causes and associated economic losses of carcass and organ condemnation in cattle and sheep in the northern part of Palestine. World's Veterinary Journal, 9(4), 317-323. https://doi.org/10.36380/scil.2019.wvj40

10. Thoen, C., LoBue, P., de Kantor, I. (2006). The importance of Mycobacterium bovis as a zoonosis. Veterinary Microbiology, 112(2-4), 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-.vetmic.2005.11.047

11. Mohammed, E. S., Maky, M. A. (2020). Meat condemnations and economic importance in the Northern and Southern Egyptian abattoirs. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 8(1), 96-107. http://doi.org/10.17582/journal. aavs/2020/8.1.96.107

12. Tamirat, B., Tamirat, H., Gebru, M.-u. (2018). Prevalence, financial impact and public health significance of Cysticercus bovis at Bahir Dar municipal abattoir, Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 10(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.5897/JVMAH2017.0650

13. Ras, R. A., Mahmoud, A.F.A., El-Ghazaly, E., Mohamed, F.M., Ahmed, B.A. (2019). Parasitic and bacterial assessment of edible offal of slaughtered animals at Sharkia abattoirs, Egypt. Egyptian Veterinary Medical Society of Parasitology Journal, 15(1), 64-88. http://doi.org/10.21608/evmspj.2019.80823

14. Youssef, A. I., Uga, S. (2014). Review of parasitic zoonoses in Egypt. Tropical medicine and health, 42(1), 3-14. https://doi. org/10.2149/tmh.2013-23

15. Raji, M. A., Salami, S. O., Ameh, J. A. (2010). Pathological conditions and lesions observed in slaughtered cattle in Zaria abattoir. Journal of Clinical Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 1(2), 9-12.

16. Mohammed, N., Hailemariam, Z., Mindaye, S. (2012). Major causes of liver condemnation and associated financial loss at Kombolcha Elfora abattoir, South Wollo, Ethiopia. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(4), 140-145.

17. Mahmoud, A. F. A., Hafez, A. E.-S. E., Shata, R. H. M., Ghazaly, E. I., El-Bayomi, R. M., Ras, R. A. M. et al. (2023). Carcasses and offal condemnation at Kom-Elnour abattoir in Dakahlia province, Egypt: Major causes and economic loss. Slovenian Veterinary Research, 60(25-Suppl), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.26873/svr-1584-2022

18. Tenaw, M., Feyera, T., Abera, B. (2015). Major causes of organ condemnation in camels slaughtered at Akaki Abattoir, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Animal Health and Production, 3(1), 14-20. http://doi.org/10.14737/journal.jahp/2015/3.1.14.20

19. Kerala, F., Hussien, D., KifleYohannes, T. (2021). Major parasitic causes of edible offal condemnation and financial loss estimation in slaughtered cattle at Butajira municipal abattoir, Southern Ethiopia. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 7(1), Article 1876344. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2021.1876344

20. Achollah, A. M., Karanja, D. N., Ng'ang'a, C. J., Bebora, L. C. (2020). Causes of organ condemnations in cattle at slaughter and associated financial losses in Siaya County, Kenya. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 12(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.5897/JVMAH2019.0779

21. El-Tahawy, A. S., Bazh, E. K., Khalafalla, R. E. (2017). Epidemiology of bovine fascioliasis in the Nile Delta region of Egypt: Its prevalence, evaluation of risk factors, and its economic significance. Veterinary World, 10(10), 1241-1249. https://doi.org/10.14202%2Fvetworld.2017.1241-1249

22. Ahmed, A. M., Ismail, S. A. S., Dessouki, A. A. (2013). Pathological lesions survey and economic loss for male cattle slaughtered at Ismailia abattoir. International Food Research Journal, 20(2), 857-863.

23. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation (MALR) (1986). The Ministerial Decision No. 517/1986 of the Minister of Agriculture and Food Security regarding the slaughter of animals, the meat trade, and the rules of meat inspection. Cairo, Egypt. Retrieved from https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ egy208080.pdf Accessed March 12, 2024 (In Arabic)

24. Herenda, D., Chambers, P.G., Seneviratna, P., da Silva, T.J.P. (1994). Manual for meat inspection for developing countries, FAO, Rome Italy, 1994.

25. Kebede, T., Mekonnen, K. (2020). Prevalence and economic significance of hydatidosis in cattle slaughtered at Dodo-la Municipality Abattoir, West Arsi Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. European Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(4), 128-138.

26. Tembo, W., Nonga, H. E. (2015). A survey of the causes of cattle organs and/or carcass condemnation, financial losses and magnitude of foetal wastage at an abattoir in Dodoma, Tan-

zania. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 82(1), Article a855. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v82i1.855

27. Alembrhan, A., Haylegebriel, T. (2013). Major causes of organ condemnation and economic loss in cattle slaughtered at Adi-grat municipal abattoir, Northern Ethiopia. Veterinary World, 6(10), 734-738. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2013.734-738

28. Jaja, I. F., Mushonga, B., Green, E., Muchenje, V. (2017). A quantitative assessment of causes of bovine liver condemnation and its implication for food security in the Eastern Cape Province South Africa. Sustainability, 9(5), Article 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050736

29. Denbarga, Y., Demewez, G., Sheferaw, D. (2011). Major causes of organ condemnation and financial significance of cattle slaughtered at Gondar ELFORA abattoir, northern Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria, 7(5), 487-490.

30. Cadmus, S. I. B., Adesokan, H. K. (2009). Causes and implications of bovine organs/offal condemnations in some abattoirs in Western Nigeria. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41, 1455-1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9334-7

31. Dukundane, B., Uyisenga, J., Rugwiro, P., Tuyishimire, A., Mubashankwaya, I., Munyandamutsa, F. et al. (2022). Conditions Responsible for Meat Condemnations in Cattle Slaughtered in Bugesera, Gicumbi and Rwamagana districts of Rwanda. European Journal of Animal Health, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.47672/ejah.903

32. Alizadeh, R., Amniattalab, A. (2019). Pathology and prevalence of hepatic lesions of Azeri buffaloes (bubalus bubalis) slaughtered at Urmia Abattoir, Northwest Iran. Journal of Food Safety and Hygiene, 5(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh. v5i1.3883

33. Bayu, Y., Asmelash, A., Zerom, K., Ayalew, T. (2013). Prevalence and economic importance of liver parasites: Hydatid cyst, Fasciola species and Cysticercus tenuicolis in sheep and goats slaughtered at Addis Ababa abattoir enterprise in Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 5(1), 1-7.

34. Mandefro, A., Aragaw, K., Hailu, B., Alemayehu, G., Chala, G. (2015). Major cause of organ and carcass condemnation and its financial loss at Bishoftu Elfora Export Abattoir. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 4(3), 364372. http://doi.org/10.11648/j-.ijnfs.20150403.24

35. Dejene, S., Abebe, B., Degefu, H. (2013). Study on the Major Health Problems That Causes Carcass and Organs Condemnation at Hashim's Export Abattoir, Debrezeit, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria, 11(4), 362-371.

36. Mummed, Y. Y., Webb, E. C. (2015). Causes of beef carcass and organ condemnations in Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10(4), 147-160. https://doi. org/10.3923/ajava.2015.147.160

37. Jaja, I. F., Mushonga, B., Green, E., Muchenje, V. (2016). Prevalence of lung lesions in slaughtered cattle in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 87(1), Article a1362. https://doi. org/10.4102/jsava.v87i1.1362

38. Abdel-Rassol, A. M. A.-A., Ahmed, A. M., Sobhy, H. M., Ab-delgayed, S. S., Hekal, S. H. A. (2022). Prevalence of lung lesions in imported cattle slaughtered at Abu Simble Abattoir, Egypt. International Journal of Veterinary Science, 11(3), 396399. https://doi.org/10.47278/journal.ijvs/2021.117

39. Kere, O. J., Joseph, E., Jessika, B. L., Maina, K. J. (2019). Prevalence and monetary loss due to cystic Echinococcosis in slaughterhouse livestock: A case study of Migori County, Kenya. Parasite Epidemiology and Control, 5, Article e00105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00105

40. Komba, E. V. G, Komba, E. V., Mkupasi, E. M., Mbyuzi, A. O., Mshamu, S., Mzula, A. et al. (2012). Sanitary practices and occurrence of zoonotic conditions in cattle at slaughter

in Morogoro Municipality, Tanzania: Implications for public health. Tanzania Journal of Health Research, 14(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v14i2.6

41. Abd Elaziz, O., Hassanin, F., Shaltout, F., Mohammed, O. (2021). Prevalence of some foodborne parasitic affection in slaughtered animals in local Egyptian abattoir. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, 41(1), 111-114. https://doi.org/10.21608/ bvmj.2021.80316.1432

42. Mulatu, M., Mekonnen, B., Tassew, H., Kumar, A. (2013). Bovine hydatidosis in eastern part of Ethiopia. Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science, 5(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.4314/ mejs.v5i1.85334

43. Ahmed, A. B., Ras, R., Mahmoud, A. F., El-Ghazaly, E., Widmer, G., Dahshan, H. et al. (2021). Prevalence and bacterial isolation from hydatid cysts in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) slaughtered at Sharkia abattoirs, Egypt. Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 45(1), 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12639-020-01300-x

44. Azami, M., Anvarinejad, M., Ezatpour, B., Alirezaei, M. (2013). Prevalence of hydatidosis in slaughtered animals in Iran. Turkiye Parazitol Derg, 37(2), 102-106. https://doi. org/10.5152/tpd.2013.24

45. Okeke, L. A., Fawole, O., Muhammad, M., Okeke, I. O., Ngu-ku, P., Wasswa, P. et al. (2016). Bovine tuberculosis: A retrospective study at Jos abattoir, Plateau State, Nigeria. Pan African Medical Journal, 25, Article 202. https://doi.org/10.11604/ pamj.2016.25.202.5669

46. Shitaye, J. E., Tsegaye, W., Pavlik, I. (2007). Bovine tuberculosis infection in animal and human populations in Ethiopia: A review. Veterinarni Medicina, 52(8), 317-332. https://doi. org/10.17221/1872-vetmed

47. Woldemariyam, F. T., Markos, T., Shegu, D., Abdi, K. D., Pae-shuyse, J. (2021). Evaluation of postmortem inspection procedures to diagnose bovine tuberculosis at Debre Birhan municipal abattoir. Animals, 11(9), Article 2620. https://doi. org/10.3390/ani11092620

48. Dechassa, T. (2014). Gross pathological lesions of bovine tuberculosis and efficiency of meat inspection procedure to detect-infected cattle in Adama municipal abattoir. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 6(2), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.5897/jvmah12.015

49. Cleaveland, S., Shaw, D. J., Mfinanga, S. G., Shirima, G., Ka-zwala, R. R., Eblate, E. et al. (2007). Mycobacterium bovis

in rural Tanzania: Risk factors for infection in human and cattle populations. Tuberculosis, 87(1), 30-43. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tube.2006.03.001

50. EDO, J. J., PAL, M., Rahman, T. (2014). Investigation into major causes of organs condemnation in bovine slaughtered at Adama municipal abattoir and their economic importance. Haryana Veterinarian, 53(2), 139-143.

51. Dyab, K. A., Hassanein, R., Hussein, A. A. A., Metwally, S. E., Gaad, H. M. (2005). Hydatidosis among man and animals in Assiut and Aswan Governorates. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 35(1), 157-166.

52. Abdel Aziz, A., Abd-Alrahman, N., El-Seify, M. and Sultan, K. (2022). Cysticercus bovis at Sohag Province: Prevalence, morphological and molecular characterizations. Sohag Journal of Junior Scientific Researchers, 2(3), 23-32. https://doi. org/10.21608/sjyr.2022.228695

53. Rabi, B., Jegede, O. (2010). Incidence of bovine cysticercosis in Kano state, northwestern, Nigeria. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 3(1), 100-103. https://doi.org/10.4314/ bajopas.v3i1.58729

54. Ahmed, A. M., Ismail, S. A. S., Dessouki, A. A. (2013). Pathological lesions survey and economic loss for male cattle slaughtered at Ismailia abattoir. International Food Research Journal, 20(2), 857-863.

55. Madzingira, O., Chinyoka, S., Yule, J., Mwenda, E. N., Kan-diwa, E., Samkange, A. et al. (2018). A retrospective study of carcass and organ condemnations at a beef abattoir in Namibia. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 59(1), 3442. https://doi.org/10.5455/ajvs.277323

56. Ciui, S., Morar, A., Tirziu, E., Herman, V., Ban-Cucerzan, A., Popa, S. A. et al. (2023). Causes of Post-Mortem Carcass and Organ Condemnations and Economic Loss Assessment in a Cattle Slaughterhouse. Animals, 13(21), Article 3339. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13213339

57. Amuamuta, A., Akalu, B., Chanie, M., Ethiopia, G. (2012). Major causes of lung and liver condemnation and financial impact in cattle slaughter at Bahir Dar Municpial Abattior. African Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4 (5), 165-171.

58. Beyene, T., Hiko, A. (2019). Zoonotic metacestodes and associated financial loss from cattle slaughtered at Yabello municipal abattoir, Borana-Oromia, Ethiopia. Parasite Epidemiology and Control, 5, Article e00096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. parepi.2019.e00096

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Relaat Ras, Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Badr University in Cairo. Badr City 11829, Cairo, Egypt. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University. El-Zeraa str. 114, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. Tel.: +20-100-468-01-14, E-mail: refaatef2018@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5291-3360

Abdallah Fikry A. Mahmoud, Professor of Meat Hygiene, Safety and Technology, Food Hygiene, Safety, and Technology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University. El-Zeraa str. 114, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. Tel.: +20-100-422-9085, E-mail: afmahmoud@vet.zu.edu.eg ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6995-0336

Abd El-Salam E. Hafez, Professor of Meat Hygiene, Safety and Technology, Food Hygiene, Safety, and Technology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University. El-Zeraa str. 114, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. Tel.: +20-109-833-44-67, E-mail: AAHafez@vet.zu.edu.eg ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5153-734X

Emad Eldin Ibrahim Ghazaly, PhD, Department of Food Hygiene, Safety, and Technology, Zagazig University. El-Zeraa str. 114, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. Tel.: +20-112-953-96-19, E-mail: emad.ghazaly21@vet.zu.edu.eg ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2973-5599

Rania Helmy M. Shata, PhD, Department of Food Hygiene, Safety, and Technology, Zagazig University. El-Zeraa str. 114, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. Tel.: +20-155-303-07-30, E-mail: rh.shata18@vet.zu.edu.eg ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4339-2962

Ahmed S. El-tahlawy, PhD, Teaching Assistant, Department of Food Hygiene, Safety, and Technology, Zagazig University. ElZeraa str. 114, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. Tel.: +20-127-361-64-80, E-mail: aseltahlawy@vet.zu.edu.eg ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-0168 * corresponding author

All authors bear responsibility for the work and presented data. All authors made an equal contribution to the work.

The authors were equally involved in writing the manuscript and bear the equal responsibility for plagiarism. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.