CC BY
127
Direct Molecular Fishing of New Protein Partners for Human Thromboxane Synthase
A. V. Svirid1, P. V. Ershov2, E. O. Yablokov2, L. A. Kaluzhskiy2, Yu. V. Mezentsev2*, A. V. Florinskaya2, T. A. Sushko1,3, N. V. Strushkevich1, A. A. Gilep1, S. A. Usanov1, A. E. Medvedev2, A. S. Ivanov2
institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Akad. Kuprevicha Str. 5/2, Minsk, 220141, Belarus
institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaya Street 10, bldg. 8, Moscow, 119121, Russia 3Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan
*E-mail: yu.mezentsev@gmail.com
Received: April 20, 2017; in final form October 11, 2017
Copyright © 2017 Park-media, Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT Thromboxane synthase (TBXAS1) catalyzes the isomerization reaction of prostaglandin H2 producing thromboxane A2, the autocrine and paracrine factor in many cell types. A high activity and metastability by these arachidonic acid derivatives suggests the existence of supramolecular structures that are involved in the regulation of the biosynthesis and directed translocation of thromboxane to the receptor. The objective of this study was to identify TBXAS1 protein partners from human liver tissue lysate using a complex approach based on the direct molecular fishing technique, LC-MS/MS protein identification, and protein-protein interaction validation by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). As a result, 12 potential TBXAS1 protein partners were identified, including the components regulating cytoskeleton organization (BBIP1 and ANKMY1), components of the coagulation cascade of human blood (SERPINA1, SERPINA3, APOH, FGA, and FN1), and the enzyme involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics and endogenous bioregulators (CYP2E1). SPR validation on the Biacore 3000 biosensor confirmed the effectiveness of the interaction between CYP2E1 (the enzyme that converts prostaglandin H2 to 12-HHT/thromboxane A2 proantagonist) and TBXAS1 (Kd = (4.3 ± 0.4) x 10-7 M). Importantly, the TBXAS1-CYP2E1 complex formation increases fivefold in the presence of isatin (indole-2,3-dione, a low-molecular nonpeptide endogenous bioregulator, a product of CYP2E1). These results suggest that the interaction between these hemoproteins is important in the regulation of the biosynthesis of eicosanoids. KEYWORDS Thromboxane synthase (CYP5A1, TBXAS1), cytochrome P450, surface plasmon resonance, direct molecular fishing, protein partners, isatin.
ABBREVIATIONS Protein-protein interaction (PPI), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), association rate constant (kon), dissociation rate constant (koff), equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd).
INTRODUCTION
Human thromboxane synthase (TBXAS1) belongs to the cytochrome P450 superfamily (CYP5A1). However, it functions differently from "classical" cytochromes P450, which catalyze various monooxygenase reactions, involving redox partners as the electron donors [1]. TBXAS1 catalyzes the reaction of prostaglandin H2 (PGH2) isomerization, which requires no redox partners and produces thromboxane A2 (TXA2)[2]. The latter acts as a paracrine and autocrine regulator and is an important mediator of platelet aggregation and contraction of blood vessels, which contributes to increase in blood pressure.
Apart from PGH2 isomerization, TBXAS1 catalyzes the alternative PGH2 transformation reaction, resulting in its cleavage to 12-hydroxy-5,8,10-heptatrienic acid (12-HHT) and malondialdehyde (MDA) [3]. There is currently no accurate information on the functional role of MDA and 12-HHT. MDA can form adducts with the protein amino groups or polar groups of phospholip-ids and thus plays a role in the molecular mechanisms of atherosclerosis, cancer, and some genetic diseases [4, 5]. 12-HHT and its metabolites can block the action of leukotriene receptors and act as a partial TXA2 antagonist by enhancing the synthesis of prostacyclin and antagonizing the thromboxane receptor (TXAR) [6, 7]. It
is possible that TBXAS1 also performs other functions: catalyze monooxygenase reactions characteristic of cytochrome P450 and involving redox partners.
TBXAS1 was first isolated from human platelets [3] and pig lungs [8]. TBXAS1 is mostly synthesized in pro-thrombocytes and monocyte precursor hematopoietic stem cells, leukocytes, and macrophages, where TXA2 is involved in the regulation of cell differentiation [9]. Synthesis of TBXAS1 was also detected in the cells of lungs, kidneys, the stomach, intestine, spleen, thymus, pancreas, and the liver [10]. TXAR, which belongs to the class of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), is expressed in many tissues (lung, spleen, liver, uterus, placenta, aorta, heart muscle, intestine, thymus, kidney, brain, and spinal cord) [11]. This may be indicative of other possible functions of TBXAS1 or the versatility of the mechanisms underlying its basic function.
One approach to elucidating the unknown functions of a protein is based on studying its interactions with other proteins whose functions are known [12]. This approach is based on the concept that the functions of the interacting protein partners must be either interrelated or form a single protein complex that performs interrelated functions. The substrate and product of the reaction catalyzed by TBXAS1 are extremely short-living and active lipophilic molecules, whose diffuse transport is complicated, while the TXA2 receptor is located on the outside of the plasma membrane. This suggests the existence of a specific transport mechanism or, most likely, an interaction with the associated protein complexes responsible for the transportation of these short-living compounds.
To date, information on experimental validation of protein-protein interactions (PPI) involving TBXAS1 remains scarse. The BioGRID database includes only two records of identified PPIs involving TBXAS1 (https://thebiogrid.org/112778/summary/homo-sa-piens/tbxas1.html?sort=bait): (1) interaction with an eukaryotic elongation factor 1 a-2 (EEF1A2) citing unpublished data [13], and (2) interaction with ubiquitin C (UBC) [14]. It is most likely that both these interactions are nonspecific, since the same BioGRID database includes records of 132 potential interactions of EEF1A2 with 124 partners and 2,332 interaction of UBC with 1,440 partners. In 2016, Meling D.D. cited in the abstract of his dissertation (Protein-protein interactions and mechanistic insights for CYP2J2 and TBXAS1) unpublished data on interaction between TBXAS1 and cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) (http://hdl.handle. net/2142/ 90774), which undoubtedly may be functionally significant, since CPR is a known protein partner of the microsomal cytochromes P450.
Previously, we developed an integrated approach to the discovery of novel protein partners interacting
with a target protein which is based on the use of direct molecular fishing on the affinity sorbent with the immobilized target protein (or peptide) as a ligand, mass spectrometric identification of the isolated proteins, and validation of the potential PPIs by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [15-17].
The objective of the present study was to search for novel potential TBXAS1 protein partners in the human liver tissue lysate using this approach. As a result, 12 potential TBXAS1 protein partners were isolated on the affinity column with immobilized TBXAS1 using a LC-MS/MS-analysis, one of which was cytochrome P450 (CYP2E1). SPR validation confirmed its interaction with TBXAS1 immobilized on the optical chip and identified another potential protein partner (CYP11B2). SPR experiments with five control cytochromes P450 (CYP2C19, CYP11A1, CYP11B1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5) were negative, indicating the high specificity of the detected PPIs. Since CYP2E1 is involved in the metabolism of various indole derivatives [18], we further investigated the possible influence of the well-known endogenous bioregulator isatin (indole-2,3-dione) [1922] on the interaction of CYP2E1 and CYP11B2 with TBXAS1. We found that isatin results in a fivefold increase in affinity of the TBXAS1 • CYP2E1 interaction and does not affect the TBXAS1 • CYP11B2 interaction.
EXPERIMENTAL
Protein preparations
Highly purified (> 95% according to denaturing po-lyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)) preparations of the recombinant proteins, TBXAS1, cytochromes P450 (limonene 6-monooxygenase (CYP2C19), steroid-20,22-lyase (CYP11A1), ster-oid-11P-hydroxylase (CYP11V1), aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2), taurochenodeoxycholate-6a-monooxy-genase (CYP3A4), cyclic hydrocarbon hydroxylase (CYP3A5), 4-nitrophenol-2-hydroxylase (CYP2E1), microsomal cytochrome b5 (CYB5A), NADPH-cy-tochrome-P450-reductase (CPR), NADPH-adrenodox-in reductase (ADR), adrenodoxin (ADX), and ferroche-latase (FECH), SMAD4, RAB27B) were prepared at the Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry (Republic of Belarus) by molecular cloning and heterologous expression in a bacterial system (E. coli), followed by purification using metal-affinity and ion exchange chromatography [23, 24]. The preparation of retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) was obtained from Cayman chemical (USA).
Human liver tissue lysate
Human liver tissue samples were obtained from the ILSbio LLC (www.ilsbio.com). The lysate was prepared
by homogenization of a 100-mg tissue liver sample in a Potter mortar with 1 mL of the CellLytic Mammalian Tissue Lysis/Extraction Reagent (Sigma, USA) and 10 of a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, USA). After centrifugation at 13,400 g and 4°C for 25 min, the supernatant was collected, glycerol was added to a final concentration of 25%, and the resulting solution was stored at -80°C. The total protein concentration in the lysate samples was 10-20 mg/mL, as determined spec-trophotometrically using a Bradford assay.
Direct molecular fishing
An affinity sorbent with covalently immobilized TBXAS1 as the bait protein was prepared by covalent protein binding to CNBr-Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. It was found that the 0.5 mg/1 g protein to sorbent ratio was optimal for binding of the used TBXAS1 preparation to the sorbent. The remaining active groups of the sorbent were inactivated by incubation in a buffer containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 150 mM NaCl. Direct molecular fishing was carried out in the original microcol-umn (volume 200 |1L) filled with the affinity sorbent. In the control experiments, a similar microcolumn filled with "empty" (no bait protein) inactivated CNBr-Sepha-rose 4B was used. HBS-EP+ buffer (10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.05% Tween 20) passed through the microcolumn at a flow rate of 50 |xL/min at 15°C was used as a running buffer. Affinity isolation of the TBXAS1 protein partners was carried out by passing 2 mL of lysate (0.5 mg/mL of protein) twofold diluted with the running buffer through the column for 80 minutes using the 10 AKTA Purifier (GE Healthcare, USA) system. Proteins from the lysate bound to the sorbent were eluted with 4% HCOOH (pH 2.5) at a flow rate of 50 |xL/min for 100 min. The total protein content in the eluates determined by the Bradford assay was 25-35 ^g/mL (average value 30 ^g/mL). The experiments on the affinity isolation of potential TBXAS1 protein partners were repeated in triplicates.
LC-MS/MS-analysis
Special sample preparation was used for the mass-spectrometric identification of the proteins. An aliquot containing 30 of total protein was sampled from each chromatographic fraction and subjected to the standard trypsinolysis procedure with preliminary reduction and alkylation of the sulfhydryl groups of the proteins. All procedures were carried out in Vivaspin 500 Centrifugal Concentrators, 10 kDa MWCO (GE Healthcare, USA) using the FASP method [25]. A ly-ophilized trypsin preparation obtained from porcine pancreas (activity 15600 IU/mg, V5111, Promega, USA) was used for trypsin digestion of the proteins.
Mass-spectrometric analysis of the samples was carried out in three technical replicates using a Agilent 1200 chromatograph and Agilent 6300 mass-detector with Ion Trap LC/MS (Agilent Technologies, USA). Peptides were separated using a reversed-phase HPLC-column ZORBAX Extend-C18 (2.1 x 150 mm, 1.8 ^m) (Agilent Technologies, USA) in a gradient of solvent A (0.2% formic acid in water) and Solvent B (0.2% formic acid in acetonitrile) for 55 min at a flow rate of 350 |xL/min. The sample volume applied to the column was 15 ^L (~ 7-8 mg of material). The gradient was as follows: from 0 to 20% of solvent B in 5 minutes, from 20 to 80% in 40 minutes, from 80 to 95% in 5 min, and 95% for 5 min. Column temperature was 50°C. Mass spectra were acquired in the positive ionization mode (APESI-ionization) with the following parameters: gas temperature 400°C, gas flow rate 9 L/min, capillary voltage 2 kV, and fragmentor voltage 360 V. The mass analyzer was operated in the auto-MS/MS-mode with the following parameters: m/z range from 50 to 2200 m/z, fragmentation energy was calculated according to the following formulas: (3.1(m/z)/100 + 1.0) V for z = 2 and (3.6(m/z)/100 - 4.8) V for z > 3. The proteins were identified using the Mascot software (www.ma-trixscience.com) and SwissProt database (www.uniprot. org). The following search parameters were used: pro-teolytic enzyme trypsin, acceptable mass deviation of monoisotopic peptides ± 2.6 Da, acceptable MS/MS deviation ± 0.6 Da, acceptable number of omitted trypsin cleavage sites is 2, variable modification - "oxidized methionine," and fixed modifications - "carbamidome-thyl." The resulting list of reliably detected proteins included only those proteins which were identified in three technical replicates with a significance of 0.01 and Mascot Score > 50.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
PPIs were analyzed on the four-channel optical biosensor Biacore 3000 (GE Healthcare, USA), whose operation is based on the surface plasmon resonance effect controlled by the Biacore Software v. 1.0. Biosensor signals were recorded in resonance units, RU (1 RU corresponds to binding of about 1 pg of the protein on the optical chip surface). The values of the equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd), association rate constants (fc ), and dissociation rate constants (koff) of the complexes were calculated using the BiaEvaluation v. 4.1 software package.
TBXAS1 was immobilized by the formation of cova-lent bonds between the carboxyl groups on the surface of the optical chip CM5 and the free amino groups of the protein. For this purpose, we used the Amine Coupling Kit (GE Healthcare, USA). The TBXAS1 sample (50 ^g/mL) in 10 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was inject-
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of TXA2 biosynthesis supplemented by our experimental results. PLC - phospholipase C, PLA2 - phospholipase A2, COX - cyclooxygenase. Biosynthesis of TXA2 begins with the release of arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids assisted by PLA2. Then, COX catalyzes the transformation of arachidonic acid into prostaglandin H2, which is then metabolized by TBXAS1 to form TXA2, 12-HHT, and MDA. At the same time, prostaglandin H2 is transformed by CYP2E1 to 12-HHT and MDA. TXA2 binding to TXAR causes signal transmission via the inositol phosphate pathway with PLC activation and mobilization of intracellular Ca2+, which has a stimulating effect on PLA2. Further, 12-HHT is metabolized by 15-hydroxyprostaglan-din dehydrogenase to form 12-keto-HHT, which has a partial antagonistic effect on TXAR. TBXAS1 also presumably interacts with BBIP1, which is a component of the protein transport complex of cilia (BBSome). BBIP1 can influence the stability of the microtubulin cytoskeleton, indirectly inhibiting HDAC6 (microtubule deacetylase).
ed at a flow rate of 5 ^L/min for 20 min. The TBXAS1 immobilization level in the working channel of the optical biosensor averaged 7,500 RU (7.5 ng/mm2).
Interactions of test proteins with the immobilized TBXAS1 were recorded in real time mode while injecting protein samples at a concentration ranging from 50 nM to 5 ^M through the control channel (without the protein) and then through the channel with immobilized TBXAS1 for 10 min at a flow rate of 5 ^L/min. Each measurement was followed by a regeneration of the optical chip surface by injecting buffer containing 2 M NaCl and 0.4% CHAPS for 30 s at a flow rate of 20 ^L/min. All measurements were performed at least 4 times, which provided adequate accuracy and reproducibility (CV value was less than 10%). In the experiments assessing the possible impact of nonpeptide low-molecular-weight endogenous bioregulator isatin (2,3-dioxoindole) on PPIs involving TBXAS1, isatin was added to the samples of analyzed proteins at a final concentration of 100 and the mixture was incubated for 15 min.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
An integrated approach based on direct molecular fishing on an affinity sorbent with a 4B target protein immobilized on CNBr-Sepharose, mass-spectromet-ric identification of isolated proteins, and validation
of PPIs with SPR enables the isolation and identification of 12 potential TBXAS1 protein partners from the lysates of human liver tissue (Table). To date, the scientific literature still provides no information on the interaction between these proteins and TBXAS1. However, some assumptions about their possible functional relationship with TBXAS1 can be made. For example, the BBIP1 protein (BBSome component of the transport protein complex of cilia) is involved in the regulation of cellular cytoskeleton stability [26, 27]. Information on ANKMY1 is available only at the transcript level. However, its structure includes ankyrin repeats, which form one of the most common interfaces for PPIs. These repeats were found in proteins characterized by various functions [28]. Based on this fact, we assumed that ankyrin repeats of ANKMY1 can specifically recognize certain structural motifs of TBXAS1, facilitating interaction between these proteins.
However, it should be noted that proteins identified by direct molecular fishing can only be considered as potential protein partners of TBXAS1, since not only real partner proteins, but also simultaneously "fished" extraneous proteins composing micelles or supramolec-ular complexes may be isolated from the lysate due to the features of this techniques [17]. Among our "fished" proteins (table), these are SERPINA1, SERPINA3, APOH, FGA, and FN1, which are involved in the blood
Running buffer
D
R
; 300-
<D
n
O
a
w
e R
100 J
-100
0.2 pM
CYP2E1
Fig. 2. Typical sensorgrams of the interaction between various concentrations of CYP2E1 and TBXAS1 immobilized on a CM5 optical chip
200
Running buffer
400
Time, s
600 500
D
R, 400
,e
I 300
a
es 200
R
100 0
-100
0.50 pM 0.25 pM
0.10 pM 0.05 pM
200
400 600 Time, s
800
1000
600
0.8
0.6
0.4
Fig. 3. Typical sensorgrams of the interaction between various concentrations of CYP11B2 and TBXAS1 immobilized on a CM5 optical chip
clotting cascade [29, 30], as well as serum proteins (HP, SAA1, CP), which can have a high nonspecific adsorption level.
The presence of CYP2E1, which belongs to the cytochromes P450 superfamily, in the list of "fished" proteins is of particular interest. A functional relationship between CYP2E1 and TBXAS1 may be important in the context of the complementary enzymatic conversion reactions of common substrates. As it is known, CYP2E1 is characterized by broad substrate specificity and a broad tissue localization profile, including the liver [31]. For example, CYP2E1 can oxidize arachidonic acid (via œ-1-hydroxylation) and prostaglandin H2 [32] to form side metabolites, which, in turn, are formed in the prostaglandin H2 to thromboxane A2 isomeriza-tion reactions. 12-keto-HHT is a further metabolite of
0.2
800
□ Isatin (-)
□ Isatin (+)
1000
CYP2E1
CYP11B2
Fig. 4. Diagram representation of equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) values of the TBXAS1CYP2E1 and TBXAS-CYP11B2 complexes in the absence and presence of 100 pM of isatin; M ± m, n = 3
one of the reaction products and can influence TXA2 by increasing prostacyclin production and antagonistic action on TXAR [4, 5]. Therefore, colocalization of TBXAS1, synthesizing thromboxane A2, and CYP2E1 could serve as an additional mechanism regulating the effectiveness of enzymatic conversion of common sub-
0
0
0
Mass-spectrometric identification of the proteins in eluates from chromatographic microcolumns filled with an affinity sorbent
S/N Gene Protein MW, Da Uniprot number a Scoreb Peptidesc emPAId
Sorbent with immobilized thromboxane (only Test). (TBXAS1 potential protein partners)
1 FGA Fibrinogen alpha chain 95656 P02671 97 19 (2) 0.04
2 FN1 Fibronectin 266052 P02751 95 14 (2) 0.01
3 CP Ceruloplasmin 122983 Q24478 85 10 (5) 0.03
4 SERPINA3 Alphal-antichymotrypsin 47792 P01011 67 9 (3) 0.08
5 SAA1 Serum amyloid A1 protein 13581 P0DJI8 67 7 (3) 0.29
6 CYP2E1 Cytochrome P450 2E1 56849 P05181 61 11 (4) 0.12
7 ANKMY1 Ankyrin repeat and MYND domain-containing protein 1 107101 Q9P2S6 59 25 (7) 0.03
8 ACTB Actin, cytoplasmic 1 42052 P60709 56 17 (2) 0.13
9 BBIP1 BBSome-interacting protein 1 10557 A8MTZ0 54 10 (4) 0.38
10 SERPINA1 Alpha 1-antitrypsin 46878 P01009 50 3 (3) 0.13
11 APOH Beta2-glycoprotein 1 39584 P02749 52 3 (3) 0.09
12 HP Haptoglobin 45861 Q61687 50 42 (6) 0.21
Sorbent without protein immobilization (only Control)
1 ACY1 Aminoacylase-1 46084 Q03154 59 17 (3) 0.08
2 ADH1A Alcohol dehydrogenase 1A 40745 P07327 189 85 (19) 0.42
3 SLC25A4 ADP/ATP translocase 1 33271 P12235 59 16 (5) 0.24
4 SLC25A5 ADP/ATP translocase 2 33059 P05141 71 27 (5) 0.11
5 MAOB Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] B 59238 P27338 147 31 (8) 0.20
6 ASL Argininosuccinate lyase 51910 P04424 89 9 (3) 0.07
7 ASS1 Argininosuccinate synthase 46786 P00966 59 48 (6) 0.17
8 ATP5B ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrial 56525 P25705 108 27 (4) 0.07
9 ATP5C1 ATP synthase subunit gamma, mitochondrial 33032 P36542 95 16 (4) 0.24
10 CALR Calreticulin 48283 P27797 68 10 (4) 0.25
11 HSPD1 60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial 61187 P10809 126 28 (7) 0.13
12 CPS1 Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase [ammonia], mitochondrial 165975 P31327 249 119 (27) 0.17
13 DEFA1 Neutrophil defensin 1 10536 P59665 58 8 (5) 0.38
14 FBP1 Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1 37218 P09467 78 4 (3) 0.10
15 FABP1 Fatty acid-binding protein, liver 14256 P07148 184 29 (17) 1.08
16 GAPDH Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 36201 P04406 169 23 (5) 0.22
17 AGL Glycogen debranching enzyme 176819 P35573 77 18 (7) 0.06
18 SHMT1 Serine hydroxymethyltransferase, cytosolic 53619 P34896 88 16 (5) 0.14
19 HSPA5 78 kDa glucose-regulated protein 72402 P11021 75 19 (4) 0.11
20 GSTA1 Glutathione S-transferase A1 25672 P08263 94 74 (13) 1.29
21 IDH1 Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP] cytoplasmic 46915 O75874 274 15 (9) 0.17
22 IDH2 Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP], mitochondrial 51333 Q8IQA7 105 10 (4) 0.15
23 LDHA L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain 36950 P00338 240 9 (8) 0.21
24 NONO Non-POU domain-containing octamer-binding protein 54311 Q15233 102 27 (6) 0.14
25 PGM1 Phosphoglucomutase-1 61696 P36871 120 10 (6) 0.12
26 SFPQ Splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich 76216 P23246 106 27 (7) 0.10
27 ACAT1 Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial 45456 P24752 60 11 (4) 0.17
28 TPI1 Triosephosphate isomerase 31057 P60174 150 12 (4) 0.26
29 UGT2B10 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B10 61190 P36537 55 8 (3) 0.06
30 UGP2 UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase 57076 Q16851 72 15 (4) 0.13
Control - upper line, Test - bottom line
1 UGP2 Alcohol dehydrogenase 1B 40684 P00325 408 117 (34) 1.02
90 53 (6) 0.30
2 ADH4 Alcohol dehydrogenase 4 41108 P08319 222 36 (16) 0.42
85 13 (8) 0.30
3 ALB Serum albumin 71317 P02768 2790 360 (150) 1.90
959 186 (50) 0.66
4 ALDH2 Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial 56859 P05091 400 33 (15) 0.29
94 7 (3) 0.07
5 ALDOB Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B 39961 P05062 167 25 (8) 0.31
220 28 (8) 0.09
6 APOA1 Apolipoprotein A-I 30759 P02647 98 12 (6) 0.42
53 25 (6) 0.59
7 ATP5F1 ATP synthase subunit b, mitochondrial 28947 P24539 192 17 (10) 0.45
97 13 (5) 0.28
8 ATP5L ATP synthase subunit g, mitochondrial 11421 O75964 265 7 (6) 0.35
157 5 (5) 0.35
9 DCXR L-xylulose reductase 26182 Q7Z4W1 194 27 (6) 0.15
161 8 (5) 0.15
10 DECR1 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase, mitochondrial 36330 Q16698 250 24 (11) 0.22
222 13 (8) 0.10
11 HSD17B4 Peroxisomal multifunctional enzyme type 2 80092 P51659 1754 179 (87) 1.26
112 16 (5) 0.09
12 SORD Sorbitol dehydrogenase 38927 Q00796 171 17 (13) 0.44
73 7 (4) 0.10
13 CES1 Liver carboxylesterase 1 62766 P23141 88 28 (4) 0.06
83 20 (4) 0.06
14 HBA1 Hemoglobin subunit alpha 15305 P69905 70 48 (10) 2.90
82 16 (6) 0.25
15 HBB Hemoglobin subunit beta 16102 P68871 153 30 (11) 0.54
222 29 (14) 0.54
16 HMGCS2 Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase, mitochondrial 57113 P22791 249 26 (13) 0.37
98 10 (3) 0.07
17 HRG Histidine-rich glycoprotein 60510 P04196 60 14 (6) 0.13
52 9 (5) 0.13
18 PHB2 Prohibitin-2 33276 Q99623 107 11 (4) 0.11
99 7 (3) 0.11
19 ACAA2 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial 42354 P42765 82 20 (6) 0.18
71 15 (3) 0.18
20 TF Serotransferrin 79294 P02787 138 20 (6) 0.15
142 22 (7) 0.20
21 SLC25A1 Tricarboxylate transport protein, mitochondrial 34333 P53007 70 9 (4) 0.23
54 10 (3) 0.23
a - Numbers in the Uniprot database (http://www.uniprot.org). b - The reliability of peptide identification by mass spectrometry (MASCOT score). c - The number of MASCOT peptides; the number of unique peptides (in parentheses). d - emPAl, Exponentially Modified Protein Abundance Index.
The names of the identified proteins are listed in the same form as they appear in the Uniprot database used for their identification.
strates. On the other hand, oligomerization of various cytochromes P450 can also lead to change in the catalytic parameters of enzymatic reactions: e.g., the affinity of the enzymes to the substrate [33]. Schematic representation of a TXA2 biosynthesis system complemented by our experimental data is shown in Fig. 1.
We confirmed the formation of the heteromer-ic TBXAS1 • CYP2E1 complex in direct SPR experiments (Fig. 2). The specificity of the TBXAS1 and CYP2E1 interaction was tested by running control SPR experiments using both microsomal (CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP3A5) and mitochondrial (CYP11A1, CYP11B1, CYP11B2) cytochromes P450 as analytes. Other well known cytochrome P450 protein partners (CYB5A, CPR, ADR, ADX) and several proteins unrelated to the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase system (FECH, SMAD4, RAB27B, RBP4) were also used for the specificity test. It was shown that all protein analytes, except for CYP11B2 (Fig. 3), did not bind to TBXAS1 immobilized on the optical chip even at micromolar concentrations. A similar control experiment using TBXAS1 as a protein analyte showed no dimerization or oligomerization process. Thus, we can confidently state that the interaction of CYP2E1 and CYP11B2 with TBXAS1 is highly specific.
The calculated K values of TBXAS1 • CYP11B2
d
and TBXAS1 • CYP2E1 complex formation were (6.9 ± 0.3) x 10-7 M and (4.3 ± 0.4) x 10-7 M, respectively. These values are comparable to Kd of the complexes of various cytochromes P450 with their functional partners (CPR, CYB5A, ADX) [23, 34-37]. It is important to note that, while the difference in the K values of complex formation is about twofold, TBXAS1 • CYP11B2 and TBXAS1 • CYP2E1 interactions are very different in their kinetic parameters. Association and dissociation of TBXAS1 • CYP2E1 occur about an order of magnitude slower compared to TBXAS1 • CYP11B2. Association rate constants (k ) are at a 10-fold difference,
1 on7 '
and dissociation rate constants of the complexes (koff) are at a 15-fold difference.
The revealing of specific TBXAS1 • CYP11B2 complex formation was a new and unexpected result, since CYP11B2 was not identified as a protein partner of TBXAS1 used as a bait in the experiments on molecular fishing from liver tissue lysate (Table). These data are quite comparable, they are not due to the false-negative results of molecular fishing, and can be explained in terms of the tissue-specific CYP11B2 expression profile (preferential expression in the adrenal tissue), which appears from the information in the open Internet resources Proteinatlas (http://www.protein-atlas.org) and Genecards (http://www.genecards.org) and publications [38]. It is currently difficult to deduce the functional consequences and causes of this PPI, so this
paper reports only on the fact of experimental confirmation of a direct interaction between TBXAS1 and CYP11B2.
It is known that indole is oxidized to isatin by some cytochromes P450 (CYP2A6, CYP2C19, and CYP2E1) which are responsible for the metabolism of various xenobiotics [18]. Isatin is an endogenous bioregulator with a wide range of biological and pharmacological activities which are implemented when it interacts with many intracellular isatin-binding proteins [1922, 39-41]. Since CYP2E1 turned out to be one of the proteins that interact with TBXAS1, we assumed that isatin can affect TBXAS1 • CYP2E1 complex formation. This hypothesis was tested via SPR analysis of the interaction between TBXAS1 and CYP2E1 in the absence and presence of isatin. We found that isatin really affects TBXAS1 • CYP2E1 complex formation, but it has no effect on the TBXAS1 • CYP11B2 interaction (Fig. 4) used as a control. The effect of the fivefold increase in the affinity of TBXAS1 • CYP2E1 in the presence of isatin is due to both a twofold increase in k
on
values and a 2.5-fold decrease in k .
off
CONCLUSION
TBXAS1 potential protein partners were isolated from a human liver tissue lysate by direct molecular fishing and mass-spectrometric identification. Using the SPR biosensor technique, it was for the first time shown that TBXAS1 interacts with cytochrome P450 CYP2E1 and CYP11B2, while the affinity of TBXAS1-CYP2E1 complex formation is fivefold higher in the presence of low-molecular-weight nonpeptide endogenous bioregulator isatin (2,3-dioxindole). Overall, our results suggest that TBXAS1 has other functions, such as participation in the functioning of the cytoskeleton and regulation of the biosynthesis of biologically active molecules.
Preparation of recombinant proteins was carried out at the Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Belarusian Academy of Sciences and supported by the Belarusian
Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research (Grant No X16P-062). The studies on molecular fishing
and identification of potential TBXAS1 protein partners were carried out at the Institute of Biomedical Chemistry and supported by the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research (grant No 16-54-00097 Bel_a), and the study of the effect of isatin on PPI involving TBXAS1 was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No 16-14 -10327). LC-MS/MS protein identification was performed using equipment from the "Human Proteome" Core Facilities of the Institute of Biomedical Chemistry (Russia)
REFERENCES
1. Waterman M.R., Pikuleva I.A. Encyclopedia of Molecular Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH., 2006. 716 p.
2. Hamberg M., Svensson J., Samuelsson B. // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1975. V. 72. № 8. P. 2994-2998.
3. Haurand M., Ullrich V. // J. Biol. Chem. 1985. V. 260. P. 15059-15067.
4. Uchida K. // Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 1999. V. 9. № 5. P. 109-113.
5. Chaudhary A.K., Nokubo M., Reddy G.R., Yeola S.N., Morrow J.D., Blair I.A., Marnett L.J. // Science. 1994. V. 265. № 5178. P. 1580-1582.
6. Sadowitz P.D., Setty B.N., Stuart M. // Prostaglandins. 1987. V. 34. № 5. P. 749-763.
7. Ruf A., Mundkowski R., Siegle I., Hofmann U., Patscheke H., Meese C.O. // Br. J. Haematol. 1998. V. 101. № 1. P. 59-65.
8. Shen R.F., Tai H.H. // J. Biol. Chem. 1986. V. 261. № 25. P. 11592-11599.
9. Ullrich V., Nüsing R. // Stroke. 1990. V. 21. № 12 Suppl. P. IV 134-138.
10. Nüsing R., Sauter G., Fehr P., Dürmüller U., Kasper M., Gudat F., Ullrich V. // Virchows Arch. A. Pathol. Anat. His-topathol. 1992. V. 421. № 3. P. 249-254.
11. Huang J.-S., Ramamurthy S.K., Lin X., Le Breton G.C. // Cell. Signal. 2004. V. 16. № 5. P. 521-533.
12. Ivanov A.S., Zgoda V.G., Archakov A.I. // Russ. J. Bioor-ganic Chem. 2011. V. 37. № 1. P. 4-16.
13. Huttlin E.L., Ting L., Bruckner R.J., Gebreab F., Gygi M.P., Szpyt J., Tam S., Zarraga G., Colby G., Baltier K., et al. // Cell. 2015. V. 162. № 2. P. 425-440.
14. Nathan J.A., Kim H.T., Ting L., Gygi S.P., Goldberg A.L. // EMBO J. 2013. V. 32. № 4. P. 552-565.
15. Ershov P., Mezentsev Y., Gnedenko O., Mukha D., Yantse-vich A., Britikov V., Kaluzhskiy L., Yablokov E., Molnar A., Ivanov A., et al. // Proteomics. 2012. V. 12. № 22. P. 32953298.
16. Ivanov A.S., Medvedev A., Ershov P., Molnar A., Mezentsev Y., Yablokov E., Kaluzhsky L., Gnedenko O., Buneeva O., Haidukevich I., et al. // Proteomics. 2014. V. 14. № 20.
P. 2261-2274.
17. Ivanov A.S., Ershov P.V., Molnar A.A., Mezentsev Y.V., Kaluzhskiy L.A., Yablokov E.O., Florinskaya A.V., Gneden-ko O.V., Medvedev A.E., Kozin S.A., et al. // Russ. J. Bioor-ganic Chem. 2016. V. 42. № 1. P. 14-21.
18. Gillam E.M., Notley L.M., Cai H., De Voss J.J., Guengerich F.P. // Biochemistry. 2000. V. 39. № 45. P. 13817-13824.
19. Medvedev A.E., Clow A., Sandler M., Glover V. // Bio-chem. Pharmacol. 1996. V. 52. № 3. P. 385-391.
20. Medvedev A., Igosheva N., Crumeyrolle-Arias M., Glover V. // Stress. 2005. V. 8. № 3. P. 175-183.
21. Medvedev A., Buneeva O., Glover V. // Biologics. 2007. V. 1. № 2. P. 151-162.
22. Pandeya S.N., Smitha S., Jyoti M., Sridhar S.K. // Acta Pharm. 2005. V. 55. № 1. P. 27-46.
23. Sergeev G.V., Gilep A.A., Usanov S.A. // Biochemistry (Moscow). 2014. V. 79. № 5. P. 406-416.
24. Dormeshkin D.O., Svirid A.V., Gilep A.A., Usanov S.A. // Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences of Belarus. 2015. V. 59. № 2. P. 53-60.
25. Wisniewski J.R., Zougman A., Nagaraj N., Mann M. // Nat. Methods. 2009. V. 6. № 5. P. 359-362.
26. Loktev A.V., Zhang Q., Beck J.S., Searby C.C., Scheetz T.E., Bazan J.F., Slusarski D.C., Sheffield V.C., Jackson P.K., Nachury M.V. // Dev. Cell. 2008. V. 15. № 6. P. 854-865.
27. Cerecedo D. // Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis. 2013. V. 24. P. 798-808.
28. Mosavi L.K., Cammett T. J., Desrosiers D.C., Peng Z. // Protein Sci. 2004. V. 13. № 6. P. 1435-1448.
29. Moussavi-Harami S.F., Annis D.S., Ma W., Berry S.M., Coughlin E.E., Strotman L.N., Maurer L.M., Westphall M.S., Coon J.J., Mosher D.F., et al. // J. Proteome Res. 2013. V. 12. № 7. P. 3393-3404.
30. Pankov R., Yamada K.M. // J. Cell Sci. 2002. V. 115. Pt 20. P. 3861-3863.
31. Lu Y., Cederbaum A.I. // Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008. V. 44. № 5. P. 723-738.
32. Arnold C., Konkel A., Fischer R., Schunck W.-H. // Pharmacol. Rep. 2010. V. 62. № 3. P. 536-547.
33. Davydov D.R., Davydova N.Y., Sineva E. V, Halpert J.R. // J. Biol. Chem. 2015. V. 290. № 6. P. 3850-3864.
34. Gnedenko O.V., Yablokov E.O., Usanov S.A., Mukha D.V., Sergeev G.V., Bulko T.V., Kuzikov A.V., Moskaleva N.E., Shumyantseva V.V., Ivanov A.S., et al. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2014. V. 593. P. 40-44.
35. Bridges A., Gruenke L., Chang Y.T., Vakser I.A., Loew G., Waskell L. // J. Biol. Chem. 1998. V. 273. № 27. P. 1703617049.
36. Strushkevich N., MacKenzie F., Cherkesova T., Grabovec I., Usanov S., Park H.-W. // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011. V. 108. № 25. P. 10139-10143.
37. Lewis D.F., Hlavica P. // Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000. V. 1460. № 2-3. P. 353-374.
38. Fallo F., Pezzi1 V., Barzon L., Mulatero P., Veglio F., Sonino N., Mathis J. M. // Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2002. V. 147. P. 795802.
39. Buneeva O.A., Kopylov A.T., Tikhonova O. V., Zgoda V.G., Medvedev A.E., Archakov A.I. // Biochemistry (Moscow). 2012. V. 77. № 11. P. 1326-1338.
40. Buneeva O., Gnedenko O., Zgoda V., Kopylov A., Glover V., Ivanov A., Medvedev A., Archakov A. // Proteomics. 2010. V. 10. № 1. P. 23-37.
41. Medvedev A.E., Buneeva O.A., Kopylov A.T., Gnedenko O.V., Medvedeva M.V., Kozin S.A., Ivanov A.S., Zgoda V.G., Makarov A.A. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014. V. 16. № 1. P. 476-495.
