CC BY
40
Experimental diabetology
www
Û
с/)
Компьютерная валидация эффективности метаболитов микроводорослей против сахарного диабета
© Gurudeeban Selvaraj, Satyavani Kaliamurthi, Zeynep Elibol Qakmak, Turgay Qakmak
istanbul Medeniyet Univerity, Стамбул, Турция I
Цель. Компьютерное моделирование эффективности применения метаболитов микроводорослей в качестве лиган-дов для антидиабетических таргетных белков, а именно глюкокиназы, фруктозы-1, 6-бисфосфатазы, киназы гли-когенсинтазы, цитохрома Р450, белка множественной лекарственной устойчивости и у-рецептора, активируемого пролифераторами пероксисом (PPARy).
Материалы и методы. Трехмерные структуры метаболитов микроводорослей были получены из базы данных химических соединений и смесей PubChem и содержали минимальное количество энергии. Активный участок таргетного белка был определен при помощи суммы Банка белковых структур. Молекулярная стыковка метаболитов микроводорослей выполнялась с помощью сервера Hex 8.0 и DockThor.
Результаты. Стыковка посредством Hex выявила, что связывающее взаимодействие фукоксантина было выше с фруктозой 1.6 бис-фосфатазой (-298,31), белком множественной лекарственной устойчивости человека 1 (-369,67) и PPARy (-404,18). Стыковка посредством DockThor показала, что зеаксантин с глюкокиназой вырабатывает более высокий уровень общей энергии (111,23 ккал/моль) и энергии взаимодействия (-99 ккал/моль). Лютеин с фруктозой 1,6 бис-фосфатазой, белком множественной лекарственной устойчивости человека, киназой гликоген-синтазы, PPARy и цитохромом р450 вырабатывал более высокий уровень общей энергии и энергии взаимодействия. Заключение. В ходе дальнейших исследований будут оцениваться антидиабетический эффект каротиноидов микроводорослей, особенно лютеина, зеаксантина и фукоксантина.
Ключевые слова: каротиноид; сахарный диабет; DockThor; глюкокиназа; микроводоросли.
@0®@
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
In silico validation of microalgal metabolites against Diabetes mellitus
© Gurudeeban Selvaraj, Satyavani Kaliamurthi, Zeynep Elibol Çakmak, Turgay Çakmak
istanbul Medeniyet Unverity, istanbul, Turkey I
Aim. Present study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of microalgal metabolites as ligands for anti-diabetic target proteins viz., glucokinase, fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase, glycogen synthase kinase, cytochrome P450, multi drug resistant protein, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-y (PPARy) via computational approach.
Matherials and methods. Three-dimensional structures of microalgal metabolites were retrieved from PubChem database and were energy minimized. The active site of target protein was predicted through PDB sum. Molecular docking was performed with microalgae metabolites by using Hex 8.0 and DockThor server.
Results. Hex docking revealed that the binding interaction of fucoxanthin was higher with fructose 1.6 bis-phosphatase (-298.31), human multidrug resistant protein 1 (-369.67), and PPARy (-404.18). DockThor docking indicated that zeaxanthin with glucokinase produced higher total energy (111.23 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-2.99 kcal/mol). Lutein with fructose 1.6 bis phosphatase, human multidrug resistant protein, glycogen synthase kinase, PPARy and cytochrome p450produced higher total energy and interaction energy.
Conclusion. Further studies will assess the anti-diabetic effect of carotenoids of microalgae especially lutein, zeaxanthin and fucoxanthin.
Key words: carotenoid; diabetes mellitus; DockThor; glucokinase; microalgae
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex disorder incorporating severe insulin dysfunction in conjunction with gross variations from the norm in glucose homeostasis, lipid and protein digestion system. In the World, number of people with type II DM and its complication is assumed to increase three times by the end of 2025 [1]. Type II DM predominantly influences more es-
tablished people in developed countries, while in developing nations like Turkey; it is affecting the youthful populace in the prime of their working lives and subsequently represents a considerably more prominent risk to the wellbeing of these people [2]. There are different target receptors involved in the regulation of glucose and fatty acid metabolism reported by number of researchers which include aldose reductase,
Received: 10.11.2016. Accepted: 11.09.2017.
© Russian Association of Endocrinologists, 2017
Experimental diabetology
cytochrome P450, fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase, glucoki-nase, multidrug resistant protein and PPAR y. The inhibitory action of these receptors is an alternative treatment to diabetes mellitus [3].
Microalgae are rich source of high value added compounds including pigments, carotenoids, fatty acids, sterols, and proteins. These metabolites were identified from different microalgae and cyanobacteria including Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Arthrospira, Porphyridium, Dunaliella salina, Haematococcus pluvialis, Chlorella protothecoides, Prorocen-trum minimum, Lyngbya majuscula, and Synechococcus [4]. Microalgal metabolites exhibit various pharmacological activities viz., anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-viral, dietary supplement antioxidants and anti-tumour agents [5]. To the best of our knowledge, there is so far no information on microalgae specific metabolites in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Structure-based drug design is an essential study to scrutinize the lead compounds to prevent the drug withdrawn from the clinical and development process [6]. Predicting the target sites of molecules using bioinformatics tools would be highly beneficial and time efficient in pharmaceutical applications to make a confident elimination avoid costly late-stage pre-clinical and clinical failures. It covers the identification of lead candidate, binding pocket, determination of target structure, and evaluation of the potential lead candidate [7]. The present study aimed to evaluate inhibitory action of microalgae metabolites to some target protein related to glucose metabolism and diabetes mellitus.
Materials and methods
Tools and software
The present study was performed by using bioinfor-matics tools, biological databases like Protein Data Bank (www.rcsb.org/), PubChem (http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/), Chimera, 3DLigandStie (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac. uk/3dligandsite/) and software's like Open Babel 2.3.1., DruLiTo, Hex 8.0 and DockThor (http://dockthor.lncc.br/).
Selection of ligands
The bioactive metabolites of microalgae such as carot-enoids, PUFA, sterols, alkaloids, and proteins were used as ligands (Table 1). The two-dimensional (2D) chemical structures of the ligands were downloaded from the PubChem database as .sdf format. The 2D structures of the selected ligands were converted into their 3D formats using Chem Sketch and it saved as .mol format. Further, the selected .mol format of lead structures were converted into a .pdb format using Open Babel 2.3.1. Sub-atomic adaptability was taken into account by considering every ligand as a gathering of conformers communicating to various zones of the conformational space available to the particle inside of a given energy range. This approach helped to explore for adoption of the best conformer in Chimera, which is based on the generalized CHARMM force field implementation with default parameters. This program uniformly identifies the best three-dimensional arrangements of ligands, exploring the activity variations across the target receptors.
Preparation of receptors
The PDB was used to download the target proteins Gluco-kinase (PDB ID: 1V4S), Fructose 1, 6 bisphosphatase (PDB ID: 2JJK), Human multidrug resistance protein (PDB ID: 2CBZ), and Cytochrome P450 (PDB ID: 3LC4), PPARy (PDB ID: 1ZGY), glycogen synthase kinase (PDB ID: 1H8F). The structure was visualized by using a molecular graphics program PyMol for the structural visualization of proteins.
Drug-likeness predictions
DruLiTo was used to determine selected microalgae metabolites as a lead like candidate based on eight filters namely Lipinski's rule, MDDR-like rule, Veber rule, Ghose filter, BBB rule, CMC-50 like rule, weighted and unweighted Quantitative Estimate of Drug-likeness.
Active sites prediction
3DLigandStie is an online tool to predict the binding site of a protein. It utilizes the idea of interaction energy between the protein and Vander Waals test to find enthusiastically good binding pockets. Energetically favourable probe sites clustered according to their spatial proximity and clusters then ranked according to the sum of interaction energies for sites within each cluster. These clusters were placed in rank request of the probability of being a binding site as indicated by total binding energies for each cluster.
Docking via Hex
The docking analysis of target proteins with microalgae metabolites was carried out by using HEX 8.0, which calculates and displays possible docking poses of protein and ligand. Docking determines the ligand with best scores and identifying the drug-receptor complex with lowest free energy. The generated metabolites were docked with the receptor by using following parameters.
1. Correlation type — Shape + Electrostatics
FFT Mode - 3D
Post Processing — MM Energies
Grid Dimension — 0.6
Receptor range — 180
Ligand range — 180
Twist range — 360
Distance Range — 40
Docking using DockThor server
The best scores and lowest free energy of the metabolite of Hex docking was further studied with DockThor program. DockThor® employs a multiple solution genetic algorithm as the search method [8] and the MMFF94S force field as the scoring function for ranking the generated poses (http://dock-thor.lncc.br/). The main steps of the ligand and protein set up are available on DockThor Portal, being possible to change the amino acid residues protonation states and include cofactors (e.g. structural water molecules, metals, organic molecules) as rigid entities. Grid size 34 A°, dimension x-17;y-17;z-17 and discretization 0.35 was used. Hydrogen bond contacts, lipo-philic interactions and non-bonded contacts were calculated using LIGPLOT [9].
Table 1
Physiochemical properties of selected microalgae metabolites
No. of ligands Name of the ligand Molecular Weight (g/mol) logP Hydrogen bond acceptor Hydrogen bond donor
Ligand 1 Astaxanthin 596.39 9.696 4 2
Ligand 2 Arachidonic acid 304.24 В.349 2 1
Ligand 3 Brassicasterol 39В.35 10.50 1 1
Ligand 4 p-Stigma sterol 412.37 11.07 1 1
Ligand 5 p-Carotene 536.44 14.73 0 0
Ligand 6 Canthaxanthin 564.4 10.7В 2 0
Ligand 7 Docosahexaenoic acid 32В.24 В.В33 2 1
Ligand 8 Eicosapentaenoic acid 302.22 В.022 2 1
Ligand 9 Fucoxanthin 65В.42 9.В74 6 2
Ligand 10 Y-amino butyric acid 103.06 -0.66 3 2
Ligand 11 Y-linolenic acid 27В.22 7.53В 2 1
Ligand 12 Lutein 56В.43 11.2В 2 2
Ligand 13 Lycopene 536.44 14.5В 0 0
Ligand 14 Microcolin A 747.4В 4.643 14 2
Ligand 15 Okadoic acid В04.47 2.973 13 5
Ligand 16 Zeaxanthin 56В.43 10.56 2 2
Table 2
Drug likeness properties of selected microalgae metabolites
No. of ligand Alogp TPSA AMR n RB n Atom nAcidic Group RC nRigidB nArom Ring nHB SAlerts
Ligand 1 7.624 74.6 196.2 10 96 0 2 35 0 6 1
Ligand 2 1.264 37.3 94.09 14 54 1 0 7 0 3 2
Ligand 3 1.933 20.2 122.21 4 75 0 4 2В 0 2 1
Ligand 4 1.257 20.2 125.29 5 7В 0 4 2В 0 2 1
Ligand 5 В.935 0 1В9.29 10 96 0 2 31 0 0 1
Ligand 6 В.92В 34.1 193.53 10 94 0 2 33 0 2 1
Ligand 7 2.933 37.3 111.27 14 56 1 0 9 0 3 1
Ligand 8 2.115 37.3 99 13 52 1 0 В 0 3 2
Ligand 9 6.631 96.4 202.15 12 106 0 3 3В 0 В 6
Ligand 10 -1.231 63.3 23.61 3 16 1 0 3 0 5 0
Ligand 11 0.446 37.3 В1.В2 13 50 1 0 6 0 3 2
Ligand 12 В.621 40.5 195.47 10 9В 0 2 33 0 4 2
Ligand 13 11.573 0 19В.04 16 96 0 0 23 0 0 2
Ligand 14 -2.604 173.9 192.В9 24 11В 0 2 30 0 16 3
Ligand 15 -3.194 1В2.В 1В9.23 10 125 1 7 53 0 1В 1
Ligand 16 В.49 40.5 195.39 10 9В 0 2 33 0 4 1
Notes: AlogP: compound's Hydrophilicity, TPSA: The Polar Surface Area Prediction, AMR: molculear refractivity, nRB: number of Rotatable Bonds, nAtom: number of Atom, nAcidicGroup: number of acidic groups, RC: Rotatable bond count, nRigidB: number of rigid bond, nAtomRing: number of Atom Ring, nHB: number of Hydrogen Bond, SAlerts:Structure alerts
Results
Prediction of physiochemical and Drug—likeness properties of ligands
The physiochemical property includes molecular weight, number of hydrogen bond acceptor and donor of selected microalgae metabolites are shown in Table 1. The drug likeness properties such as compound's hydrophilicity, the polar surface area prediction, molecular refractivity, number of rotatable bonds, number of atom, number of acidic groups, ro-tatable bond count, number of rigid bond, number of atom ring, number of hydrogen bonds, structure alerts are explained in Table 2.
Prediction of active sites residues in receptor
Computational approaches screen the possibilities of microalgae metabolites (ligand) to treat diabetes and its complication. Glucokinase have the following residues in the active sites GLU 256, PHE 152, PRO 153, THR 168, SER 151, GLY 229, GLU 290, ASP 205, GLC 500, LYS 169, ASN 204, and ASN 231. Fructose 1,6 bis phosphatase have THR 31, ALA 24, GLY 28, ARG 22, MET 18, ARG 22, ALA 24, VAL 17, THR 31, LEU 30, GLY 28, and THR 27. Human multidrug resistant proteins have GLN 713, LYS 684, VAL 680, GLY 681, THR 660, SER 686, TRP 653, ATP 1873, CYS 682 and. Cytochrome P450 have ASN 367, PHE 470, PHE 429, HIS 370, GLY 438, THR 307, TRP 128, ARG 109, HIS 109
Figure 1. Predicted binding site residues of glycogen synthase kinase using LigandStie
Table 3
Molecular Docking of Microalgae metabolites ligands using Hex
S.No Total energ y (kcal/mol)
FBP GK CP450 MDRP 1 PPARy GSK
Ligand 1 -255.35 -380.75 -379.21 -371.2б -3б0.17 -275.43
Ligand 2 -190.95 -2бб.б4 -27б.99 -221.88 -284.43 -2б4.93
Ligand 3 -199.54 -312.94 -300.23 -2б0.21 -299.89 -2б1.81
Ligand 4 -218.84 -288.89 -30б.25 -271.8б -30б.48 -307.37
Ligand S -250.02 -3б7.48 -3б3.17 -357.48 -3б5.б8 -299.81
Ligand б -254.87 -378.28 -388.87 -372.98 -355.12 -275.58
Ligand 7 -171.82 -285.18 -29б.2б -232.31 -277.52 -253.б1
Ligand 8 -191.82 -2б2.72 -255.94 -230.14 -28б.б9 -299.б2
Ligand 9 -298.31 -385.3б -377.89 -3б9.б7 -404.18 -28б.01
Ligand 10 -191.95 -131.б8 -138.12 -122.75 -144.5б -129.83
Ligand 11 -172.49 -2б9.41 -297.б5 -235.28 -247.04 -242.52
Ligand 12 -248.41 -371.49 -402.54 -3б1.9б -373.б2 -2б8.8
Ligand 13 -270.11 -349.8б -257.95 -343.28 -344.42 -382.39
Ligand 14 -279.б1 -349.92 -340.97 -359.49 -3бб.0б -339.б2
Ligand 15 -289.19 -3б3.81 -3бб.84 -359.49 -391.88 -331.52
Ligand 1б -247.55 -404.38 -409.42 -3б7.59 -373.34 -259.2
Notes: C P450 - cytochrome P450; FBP - fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase; GK - glucokinase; GSK - glycogen synthase kinase; MDRP1 - multidrug resistance proteinl; PPARy- peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor y;
residues in their active site. PPARy have HIS 323, PHE 282, LEU 469, HIS 449, TYR 327, ILE 326, CYS 285, MET 364 and Glycogen synthase kinase have 28ILE, 33PHE, 36VAL, 49ALA, 51LYS, 76VAL, 99ASP, 100TYR, 101VAL, 104THR, 151GLN, 152ASN, 154LEU, 165CYS, 166 ASP residues in their active site (Fig. 1).
Docking of microalgae metabolites with receptors
Hex server based docking results of the aldose reductase, cytochrome P450, glucokinase and fructose-1, 6-bisphospha-tase, permeability glycoprotein, PPARy with ligands of microalgae metabolites interaction energy are shown in the Table 3. The binding interaction of fucoxanthin simulated higher total binding energy with fructose 1,6 bis-phosphatase, multidrug resistant protein 1, and PPARy. Lutein simulated more total binding energy with glycogen synthase kinase, and zeaxan-thin simulated higher total binding energy with glucokinase and cytochrome p450. Amongst 16 major microalgae metabolites, fucoxanthin, lutein and zeaxanthin were simulated as higher binding energy with anti-diabetic target proteins. DHA, gamma linolenic acid, EPA and GABA exhibited least binding energy with target proteins compared to carotenoids. Microcolin A and okadaic acid were simulated higher binding energy with target proteins compared to fatty acids (Table 3).
DockThor simulation was carried out to confirm binding interaction of target proteins with fucoxanthin, lutein, zea-xanthin, microcolin A and okadaic acid. Table 4 indicates the results of total energy and interaction energy. Docking simulation of lutein with fructose 1,6 bis phosphatase produced higher total energy (145.66 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-23.01 kcal/mol) on the first run. Lutein with multidrug resistant protein produced higher total energy (1, 48,085 kcal/
mol) and interaction energy (-8.531 kcal/mol) on the 8th run. Zeaxanthin with glucokinase produced higher total energy (111.23 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-2.99 kcal/mol) on the 25th run. Lutein with glycogen synthase kinase produced higher total energy (1, 59, 766 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-0.018 kcal/mol) on the 11th run. Lutein with PPARy produced higher total energy (135.38 kcal/mol) and interaction energy (-30.604 kcal/mol) on the 8th run. Lutein with cytochrome p450 produced higher total energy (137.113 kcal/ mol) and interaction energy (-30.279 kcal/mol) on the 10th run. Fig. 2 indicated the molecular interaction of lead candidates with target receptor.
Discussion
Hex is an interactive modern molecular graphics program can calculate protein-ligand docking, protein —protein docking and protein— nucleotides docking modes. Assuming that the ligand is rigid, ligand docking can superpose pairs of three dimensional structures of molecules [10]. The superpose can be used as spherical polar fourier (SPF) correlation to accelerate the calculations. It encodes surface shape, electrostatic charge, and potential distribution. This feature allows each property to be represented by a coefficient vector. In the present study, the electrostatic charge distribution of microalgae metabolites with the surface of target receptors was calculated. The surface states of proteins utilizing a two-term surface skin in addition to van der Waals steric thickness model, though the electrostatic model is gotten from traditional electrostatic hypothesis [11]. The DockThor Portal, developed by the group GMMSB/LNCC, is a free receptor-ligand docking server. The implemented program is a flexible-ligand and rigid-receptor
Table 4
Molecular Docking of Selected ligands using DockThor Server
Figure 2. Docking interaction of lutein and zeaxanthin with target
receptors predicted by LigPlot (blue line - ligand bonds; red line - non ligand bonds; dotted lines - hydrogen bonds and its length; half red circle - non ligand residues involved in the hydrophobic contacts; black dots - corresponding atoms involved in the hydrophobic contacts). (a) The atomic interaction between HE21 atom of the GLN267 (red colour) in the cytochrome p450 receptor and an oxygen atom of lutein; (b) The atomic interaction between OD2 atom of the ASP199 (red colour) in the fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase and oxygen atom of Lutein; (c) The atomic interaction between oxygen atom of the PRO312 and PHE 62 (red colour) in the glucokinase receptor and a hydrogen atom of zeaxanthin; (d) The atomic interaction between HN, HH21 atom of the ARG96 and ARG144 (red colour) in the glycogen synthase kinase receptor and an oxygen atom of lutein; (e) The atomic interaction between oxygen atom of the ARG 780 (red colour) in the human multidrug resistant protein and a hydrogen atom of lutein; (f) The atomic interaction between oxygen atom of the ALA300 (red colour) in the PPARy receptor and a hydrogen atom of lutein.
grid based method that employs a multiple solution genetic algorithm along the MMFF94S molecular force field scoring function. The main steps of the ligand and protein set up are available on the DockThor Portal, being possible to change the amino acid residues protonation states and include cofactors (e.g. structural water molecules, metals, organic molecules) as rigid entities. In the present study, the active site amino acid residues of target proteins were changed to confirm the binding affinity with ligands.
Depending on the stress condition applied, a wide range of polyunsaturated fatty acids, carotenoids, carbohydrates, and sterols were produced from microalgae in a non-toxic manner [12]. Taouis et al. showed that food supplements enriched with omega 3-unsaturated fats expanded the cell plasticity and reduced insufficient insulin action caused by the accumulation of high fatty acids [13]. There is a strong relationship between controlling blood glucose level and prevention rate of microvascular complications (diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy) (Zoungas, 2014). In the present study,
Receptor Ligand Run Total energy (Kcal/mol) Interaction energy (Kcal/mol)
Ligand 9 28 91.21 -22.31
Fructose 1,6 bisphosphatase Ligand 12 1 145.66 -23.51
Ligand 14 18 56.72 -25.24
Ligand 15 18 56.72 -25.25
Ligand 16 28 96.11 -19.99
Ligand 9 10 103.49 -2.58
Ligand 12 9 101.2 -2.07
Glucokinase Ligand 14 3 75.52 -3.66
Ligand 15 1 76.71 -3.97
Ligand 16 25 111.23 -2.99
Ligand 9 26 98,172 -10,209
Human Multidrug resistant protein Ligand 12 8 1,48,085 -8,531
Ligand 14 18 67,357 -13,554
Ligand 15 18 67,357 -13,554
Ligand 16 20 1,07,047 -7,888
Ligand 9 20 1,06,039 -0.016
Glycogen synthase kinase Ligand 12 11 1,59,766 -0.018
Ligand 14 8 79,959 -0.033
Ligand 15 8 79,959 -0.033
Ligand 16 14 1,14,133 -0.014
Ligand 9 12 94.671 -22.822
Peroxisome Ligand 12 8 135.384 -30.604
proliferator Ligand 14 18 49.631 -32.991
activated receptor Ligand 15 18 49.631 -32.991
Ligand 16 28 96.111 -19.995
Ligand 9 8 81.088 -27.564
Ligand 12 10 137.113 -30.279
Cytochrome P450 Ligand 14 30 52.591 -27.459
Ligand 15 30 52.591 -27.459
Ligand 16 13 88.041 -27.111
sixteen different microalgae metabolites including Astax-anthin, Arachidonic acid, Brassicasterol, p-Stigma sterol, P-Carotene, Canthaxanthin, Docosahexaenoic acid, Eicosa-pentaenoic acid, Fucoxanthin, y-linolenic acid, y-amino butyric acid, Lutein, Lycopene, Microcolin A, Okadaic acid and Zeaxanthin were evaluated in their inhibitory action against target proteins.
Glucokinase and fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase are the most important enzymes to regulate blood glucose level in human liver. The activities of these enzymes enhanced production of glucose through glycerol or gluconeogenic amino acids [14]. The constant formation of glucose affected serious non-insulin dependent diabetic conditions. The analogues of lutein and zeaxanthin reported to have significant binding affinity with glucokinase and glycogen synthase [15]. Similar results were observed in glucokinase, glycogen synthase and fructose 1,6 bis phosphatase with three different carotenoids lutein, fucoxanthin and zeaxanthin. Permeability of glycopro-tein causes genetic variations in transporter proteins which lead to decrease in the level of high-density lipoprotein, increase in blood glucose level, cystic fibrosis, acute damage to retina and kidney of diabetic patients [16]. Cytochrome P450
3i
o^sSSSSSSSSS
Сахарный диабет. 2017;20(4):301-307 doi: 10.14341/DM8212 Diabetes Mellitus. 2017;20(4):301-307
Experimental diabetology
enzyme involved in the regulation of ADME properties of endogenous and exogenous compounds through activating or deactivating drug molecules [17]. Surprisingly, a severe hy-perglycemic condition associated with free radical formation leads to hepatocellular damage and elevated level of CYP450 dependent monooxygenase enzyme in diabetic rats [18]. The dietary fucoxanthin showed greater decrease in blood glucose level, plasma insulin concentration and increase in the activity of enzymatic antioxidants in diabetic/obese KK-A mice model
[19]. It showed more potential DPPH free radical scavenging activity than other carotenoids under anaerobic condition
[20]. In our study, docking of fucoxanthin with cytochrome P450, glucokinase and MDRP-1 showed potential binding interaction. Liu et al. reported that fucoxanthin purified from an edible marine seaweed undaria Pinnatifida could diminish the rifampin-affected Cytochrome P450 3A4 and multiple drug resistance 1 expression through attenuation of Human pregnane X receptor mediated by CYP3A4 promoter activation
[21]. Earlier reports showed that fucoxanthin and fucoxanthi-nol has the potential to reduce body fat and lipid accumulation via inhibition of 3T3-L1 adipocyte cells differentiation by down regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor A [22]. Combined effect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma ligands such as fucoxanthin and tro-glitazone which potentially decreased the viability of colon cancer Caco-2 cells. Additionally the purified fucoxanthine ligand showed significant DNA fragmentation in Caco-2 colon cancer cell lines when compared to astaxanthin and beta carotene [23]. Kohno et al. reported that azoxymethane and dextran sodium sulfate induced colon tumorigenesis was significantly inhibited by troglitazone PPAR ligand molecules [24]. Therefore, fucoxanthin may represent a therapeutic target in the treatment of diabetes-induced oxidative stress and hyperlipidemic condition.
Glycogen synthase kinase is a type of serine or threonine kinase enzyme which is involved in the glycogen and protein synthesis [25]. However over expression of glycogen synthase kinase leads to insulin inability which causes huge amount of glucose deposition in respective muscles. There are valuable reports on acceleration of insulin dependent glycogen synthase kinase inhibition and glucose metabolism in skeletal muscles of type II DM patients [26]. In the present study, lutein showed high binding energy with Glycogen synthase kinase. In silico findings might provide new insights into treatment of type II DM. Reduced level of lutein and zeaxanthin in the dietary supplement cause age related macular degeneration diseases in humans which generally affect the individual central vision. Bone et al. reported that the graded doses treatment of lutein (2.4 to 30 mg/d) and zeaxanthin significantly increased the level of serum concentration and macular pigment density in the human subjects [27]. Prolonged hyperglycemic conditions decreased the level of antioxidants, nitro tyrosine and increased apoptotic conditions in the retina cells. The vision loss
in diabetic rats was significantly reduced by oral administration of 0.5 mg/kg of lutein up to 12 weeks [28]. Also the lutein adjuvant therapies need further studies to improve effective drug molecules. Lutein could diminish the deleterious outcomes of cerebral I/R in stroke patients [29]. The present study was supported by this information which explains the inhibitory action of aldose reductase by lutein and zeaxanthin. Overproduction of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress are closely associated with various health issues such as progression of atherosclerosis, hypercholesterolemia, ischemic reperfusion, and diabetes with advanced glycation products, hyperlipidemia, foot ulcer complications, cardiovascular diseases and further endothelial dysfunction [30]. PPAR y is also called as gli-tazone receptor, which are involved in the regulation of fatty acid storage and glucose metabolism in humans. Remarkably, the PPAR-y concerned in the pathology of various diseases including diabetes mellitus, obesity and atherosclerosis [31]. As keto-carotenoids, astaxanthin and canthaxanthin are abundant in algae while they are rarely seen in plants [32]. Previous studies showed that the antioxidant activity of astaxanthin is approximately higher than zeaxanthin, lutein, canthaxanthin, beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol [33]. Oral administration of astaxanthin significantly reduces the plasma glucose level in alloxan-induced diabetic mice [34]. The dietary intake of 0.1% fucoxanthin significantly reduced lipid hydro-peroxide levels of the liver, abdominal white adipose tissue and blood glucose levels of KK-Ay mice [35].
In conclusion, this study reveals that some special micro-algal carotenoids; particularly lutein, fucoxanthin and zea-xanthin represent excellent source for the development of the novel antidiabetic drugs. As revealed by docking analyses in this study, the binding interaction of fucoxanthin is considerably high with fructose 1,6 bis-phosphatase, human multidrug resistant protein 1, and PPARy. Moreover, lutein with fructose 1,6 bis phosphatase, human multidrug resistant protein, glycogen synthase kinase, PPARy and cytochrome p450 produce higher total energy and binding interaction. Lastly, zeaxanthin with glucokinase produces remarkably high total energy and interaction energy. Further experimental studies will confirm the therapeutic efficacy of these carotenoids for development of novel antidiabetic drugs.
Additional information
Compliance with ethical standards
No conflict of interested. The authors did not receive any fund for this work.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK -2216) for researcher grant and the Research fund of Istanbul Medeniyet University for financial support (Project#FBA-2012-185)
Список литературы | References
1. Li RX, Yiu WH, Wu HJ, et al. BMP7 reduces inflammation and oxidative 2. Malhan S, Öksüz E, Babineaux SM, et al. Assessment of the Direct Medical
stress in diabetic tubulopathy. Clin Sci (Lond). 201 5;1 28(4):269-280. Costs of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications in Turkey Türkiye ' de
doi:10.1042/CS20140401 Tip 2 Diabetes Mellitus ve Komplikasyonlarinin Dogrudan Tibbi Maliyetine
Сахарный диабет. 2017;20(4):301-307
doi: 10.14341/DM8212
-К
Diabetes Mellitus. 2017;20(4):301-307
Experimental diabetology
íl¡§k¡n Degerlendirme. Turkish J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18(2):39-43. doi:10.4274/tjem.2441
3. Balamurugan R, Stalin A, Ignacimuthu S. Molecular docking of Y-sitosterol with some targets related to diabetes. Eur J Med Chem. 2012;47:38-43. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.10.007
4. Guedes AC, Amaro HM, Malcata FX. Microalgae as sources of high added-value compounds-a brief review of recent work. Biotechnol Prog. 2011;27(3):597-613. doi:10.1002/btpr.575
5. Raposo MF de J, de Morais RMSC, Bernardo de Morais AMM. Bioactivity and applications of sulphated polysaccharides from marine microalgae. Mar Drugs. 2013;11(1):233-252. doi:10.3390/md1 1010233
6. Udenigwe CC, Mohan A. Mechanisms of food protein-derived antihypertensive peptides other than ACE inhibition. J Funct Foods. 2014;8:45-52. doi:10.1016/i.iff.2014.03.002
7. Arora A, Kumar N, Agarwal T, Maiti S. Retraction: Human telomeric G-quadruplex: targeting with small molecules. FEBS J. 2010;277(5):1345-1345. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07461.x
8. Magalhaes CS de, Barbosa HJC, Dardenne LE. A genetic algorithm for the ligand-protein docking problem. Genet Mol Biol. 2004;27(4):605-610. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572004000400022
9. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 1995;8(2):127-134. doi: 10.1093/protein/8.2.127
10. Mavridis L, Hudson BD, Ritchie DW. Toward high throughput 3D virtual screening using spherical harmonic surface representations. J Chem Inf Model. 47(5):1787-1796. doi:10.1021/ci7001507
11. Ritchie DW, Kozakov D, Vajda S. Accelerating and focusing proteinprotein docking correlations using multi-dimensional rotational FFT generating functions. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(1 7): 1 865-1 873. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn334
12. Ryckebosch E, Muylaert K, Foubert I. Optimization of an Analytical Procedure for Extraction of Lipids from Microalgae. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2012;89(2):189-198. doi:10.1007/s1 1746-01 1-1903-z
13. Taouis M, Dagou C, Ster C, et al. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids prevent the defect of insulin receptor signaling in muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002;282(3):E664-71. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00320.2001
14. Zarzycki M, Kotodziejczyk R, Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska E, et al. Structure of E69Q mutant of human muscle fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2011 ;67(Pt 12):1028-1 034. doi:10.1107/S090744491104385X
15. Middha SK, Goyal AK, Faizan SA, et al. In silico-based combinatorial pharmacophore modelling and docking studies of GSK-3p and GK inhibitors of Hippophae. J Biosci. 2013;38(4):805-814. doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9367-y
16. Quezada C, Alarcón S, Cárcamo JG, et al. Increased expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) in kidney glomeruli of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Biol Chem. 2011;392(6):529-537. doi:10.1515/BC.2011.052
17. Guengerich FP. Cytochrome p450 and chemical toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008;21(1):70-83. doi:10.1021/tx700079z
18. Chen TL, Chang HC, Chen TG, Tai YT, Chen RM. Modulation of cytochrome P-450 dependent monooxygenases in streptozotocin-induced diabetic hamster: I. Effects of propofol on defluorination and cytochrome P-450 activities. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2000;38(1):15-21.
19. Maeda H, Hosokawa M, Sashima T, Miyashita K. Dietary combination of fucoxanthin and fish oil attenuates the weight gain of white adipose tissue and
decreases blood glucose in obese/diabetic KK-Ay mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(19):7701-7706. doi:10.1021/jf071569n
20. Nomura T, Kikuchi M, Kubodera A, Kawakami Y. Proton-donative antioxidant activity of fucoxanthin with 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1997;42(2):361-370. doi: 10.1080/15216549700202761
21. Liu C-L, Lim Y-P, Hu M-L. Fucoxanthin attenuates rifampin-induced cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and multiple drug resistance 1 (MDR1) gene expression through pregnane X receptor (PXR)-mediated pathways in human hepatoma HepG2 and colon adenocarcinoma LS174T cells. Mar Drugs. 2012;10(1):242-257. doi:10.3390/md10010242
22. Maeda H, Hosokawa M, Sashima T, et al. Fucoxanthin and its metabolite, fucoxanthinol, suppress adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. Int J Mol Med. 2006;18(1):147-152. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.18.1.147
23. Hosokawa M, Kudo M, Maeda H, et al. Fucoxanthin induces apoptosis and enhances the antiproliferative effect of the PPARgamma ligand, troglitazone, on colon cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1675(1-3):1 13-1 19. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.08.012.
24. Kohno H, Yoshitani S, Takashima S, et al. Troglitazone, a ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, inhibits chemically-induced aberrant crypt foci in rats. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2001;92(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2001.tb01108.x
25. Henriksen EJ, Dokken BB. Role of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Curr Drug Targets. 2006;7(11):1435-1441. doi: 10.2174/1389450110607011435
26. Nikoulina SE, Ciaraldi TP, Mudaliar S, et alR. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3 improves insulin action and glucose metabolism in human skeletal muscle. Diabetes. 2002;51(7):2190-2198. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2190
27. Bone RA, Landrum JT, Guerra LH, Ruiz CA. Lutein and zeaxanthin dietary supplements raise macular pigment density and serum concentrations of these carotenoids in humans. J Nutr. 2003;133(4):992-998.
28. Arnal E, Miranda M, Johnsen-Soriano S, et al. Beneficial effect of docosahexanoic acid and lutein on retinal structural, metabolic, and functional abnormalities in diabetic rats. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34(1 1 ):928-938. doi:10.3109/02713680903205238.
29. Li S-Y, Yang D, Fu ZJ, et al. Lutein enhances survival and reduces neuronal damage in a mouse model of ischemic stroke. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;45(1):624-632. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2011.10.008
30. Dzau VJ, Antman EM, Black HR, et al. The cardiovascular disease continuum validated: clinical evidence of improved patient outcomes: part I: Pathophysiology and clinical trial evidence (risk factors through stable coronary artery disease). Circulation. 2006;1 14(25):2850-2870. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATI0NAHA.106.655688
31. Jones JR, Barrick C, Kim K-A, et al. Deletion of PPARgamma in adipose tissues of mice protects against high fat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;1 02(17):6207-6212. doi:10.1073/pnas.0306743102
32. Takaichi S. Carotenoids in algae: distributions, biosyntheses and functions. Mar Drugs. 2011;9(6):1101-1118. doi:10.3390/md9061101
33. Naguib YM. Antioxidant activities of astaxanthin and related carotenoids. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48(4):1150-1154. doi: 10.1021/jf991106k
34. Wang J, Chen Z, Lu W. Hypoglycemic effect of astaxanthin from shrimp waste in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. Med Chem Res. 2012;21(9):2363-2367. doi:10.1007/s00044-011-9765-3
35. Iwasaki S, Widjaja-Adhi MAK, Koide A, et al. In Vivo Antioxidant Activity of Fucoxanthin on 0bese/Diabetes KK-Ay Mice. Food Nutr Sci. 2012;3(1 1):1491-1499. doi:10.4236/fns.2012.311194
Информация об авторах [Authors Info]
Turgay Qakmak, MD, PhD; address: Dumlupinar Mahallesi, D-100 Karayolu No:98; e-mail: [email protected]
Selvaraj Gurudeeban, PhD in Marine Biotechnology; ORCID: http:// orcid.org/0000-0002-7223-3853; e-mail: [email protected]. Satyavani Kaliamurthi, PhD; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3604-8810; e-mail: [email protected]. Zeynep Elibol Qakmak, PhD in Biology; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6772-5570; e-mail: [email protected].
Цитировать:
Бекага] С., КаНатиг^ Б., ЕНЬо1 фактак I., фактак Т. Компьютерная валидация эффективности метаболитов микроводорослей против сахарного диабета // Сахарный диабет. - 2017. - Т.20. - №4. - С. 301-307. 10.14341/РМ8212
To cite this article:
Selvaraj G., Kaliamurthi S., Elibol Çakmak Z., Çakmak T. In silico validation of microalgal metabolites against Diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus. 2017;20(4):301-307. doi: 10.14341/DM8212
3
Сахарный диабет. 2017;20(4):301-307 doi: 10.14341/DM8212 Diabetes Mellitus. 2017;20(4):301-307
