CC BY
92023, Scienceline Publication
Worlds Veterinary Journal
World Vet J, 13(1): 200-204, March 25, 2023
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.54203/scil.2023.wvj21
Detection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Salmonella spp. Isolated From Commercial Eggs in Tiaret Province, Algeria
Rachid Merati* and Abdellatif Boudra
Laboratory of Hygiene and Animal Pathology, University of Tiaret, 14000, Tiaret, Algeria *Corresponding author's Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Salmonellosis is a significant public health problem worldwide. The current study aimed to investigate the presence of Salmonella spp. in commercial eggs of Tiaret province, Algeria, and evaluate the susceptibility of isolated strains to different antimicrobial agents. A total of 180 commercial eggs collected from various retail outlets (groceries, butchers, wholesalers, street vendors) were analyzed by conventional methods, and 13 Salmonella spp. isolates were tested on a panel of 7 antimicrobial agents using the disc diffusion method. Of 180 chicken egg content samples examined, the findings indicated that 13 (7.22%) were positive for Salmonella spp. Regarding the collection site, 2 (1.11%), 4 (2.22%), and 7 (3.88%) of Salmonella spp. isolates were detected from butchers, wholesalers, and street vendors, respectively. Most antibiotic discs have demonstrated widespread resistance with an incidence rate of 100%, including amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ampicillin, nalidixic acid, and erythromycin. However, colistin sulfate, gentamycin, and tetracycline were more effective against Salmonella isolates. It can be concluded that the highest detection rate of Salmonella spp. was observed for street vendors, and the highest resistance was recorded for commonly used antibiotics in poultry production.
Keywords: Antimicrobial, Chickens, Commercial eggs, Salmonella, Tiaret INTRODUCTION
Salmonellosis is considered one of the most common foodborne diseases. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported 94 million cases of non-typhoid Salmonella gastroenteritis worldwide, with annual deaths reaching 500,000 in 2018 (WHO, 2018). Furthermore, the incidence and severity of cases of salmonellosis have increased significantly in both developed and developing countries (WHO, 2014). In Algeria, over 5000 human cases are reported yearly, but the real number of infections is likely higher (Fourar, 2019).
Poultry products are the most incriminated in most traceable foodborne diseases caused by Salmonella (Thorns, 2000). Chicken eggs, in particular, are considered the most potent food vectors of this bacterium for humans (Finstad et al., 2012). The contamination of eggshells and egg contents can occur during egg formation in the reproductive tract of laying hens or during processing and distribution due to poor hygienic practices (Moosavye et al., 2015).
Salmonella bacterium is a Gram-negative rod genus belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family. Within two main species Enterica and Bongoli, over 2500 serotypes or serovars have been identified to date. Enterica species with serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium are considered to be the most common foodborne species that cause human salmonellosis (Bahness et al., 2015).
Over the past decade, antimicrobial resistance has become a severe public health problem worldwide (Ali and Mohamed, 2020; Mirzaei et al., 2022). Several researchers have reported the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from poultry products (Almashhadany, 2019; Xie et al., 2019; Merati et al., 2020). Antimicrobial resistance is a natural consequence of adapting infectious agents to exposure to antimicrobials in medicine and food animals. Therefore, an increase in the resistance, particularly of Salmonella, to commonly used antimicrobials has been noted in both public health and veterinary sectors, and multidrug-resistant phenotypes have been increasingly described among Salmonella species worldwide (Castro-Vargas et al., 2020). Monitoring antibiotic resistance among Salmonella isolates and controlling its health risk is essential.
Due to the lack of updated and accurate data in Tiaret Province, Algeria, about the antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella spp. associated with commercial eggs, the present study investigated the presence of Salmonella spp. in the commercial eggs in Tiaret Province, Algeria, and evaluated the susceptibility of isolated strains to different antimicrobial agents.
ISSN 2322-4568
> R i.
e i
P v
e ft
d :
m 2 4
3 OO 6 M a 8
c| 2
oo§ § 2 0 — 3 1
0
1 —
G
HH
N A L
A R
T —
C L
E
200
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethical approval
This research was performed following the Veterinary Sciences Institute, University of Tiaret, Algeria guidelines.
Study area
The study was performed in Tiaret province, in Western Algeria. Geographically, the study site is located at a latitude of 35° 22' 15.71" N and a longitude of 1° 19' 1.16" E, and at an elevation average of 978 m above sea level.
Egg samples collection
A total of 180 unwashed chicken eggs were collected at random from different retail outlets (groceries [45], butchers [45], wholesalers [45], and street vendors [45]), located in Tiaret Province, under sterile hygienic conditions from January to May 2021. The samples were aseptically transported in an ice box to the hygiene and animal pathology laboratory, Tiaret, Algeria, for immediate bacteriological analysis.
Culture of Salmonella
Isolation procedures for Salmonella were carried out according to the recommendations of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 6579, 2002). To collect the egg content, the surface of each chicken egg was disinfected with 75% alcohol, the shell was cracked with a sterile knife and carefully removed, each egg's content was mixed thoroughly and 25 g of the mixed egg content was inoculated into 225 ml of peptone broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After the overnight incubation, 1 ml of the pre-enrichments broth was transferred aseptically into a tube containing 9 ml of Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth and incubated at 37°C overnight. Following incubation, a loopful of the broth was streaked onto one plate of xylose lysine desoxycholate agar (XLD; Biokar, France) and another plate of Salmonella-Shigella agar (SS; Biokar, France), and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. Presumptive colonies for Salmonella isolates were then transferred onto nutrient agar (Oxoid, UK) and incubated aerobically at 37°C overnight (ISO, 2002).
Biochemical test
Salmonella suspected isolates were inoculated into triple sugar iron agar (TSI) slopes (Sigma-Aldrish, US) and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. Typical Salmonella phenotypes were further confirmed with Analytic Profile Index (API) 20 E test strips (BioMerieux, France; Yang et al., 2015). All isolated strains were stored in peptone-glycerol solutions at -20°C for subsequent analysis.
Antibiotics susceptibility testing
The susceptibility of Salmonella isolates to antibiotics was examined by using the agar disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton Agar (MH; Biokar, France) according to the Standardization of Susceptibility to the National Scale Human and Veterinary (SSNSHV, 2011) guidelines. The following antibiotics manufactured for the analytical purpose were tested, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (AMC: 30 ^g; CYPRESS DIAGNOSTICS, Belgium), ampicillin (AM: 10 ^g; CYPRESS DIAGNOSTICS, Belgium), tetracycline (TE: 30 ^g; CYPRESS DIAGNOSTICS, Belgium), gentamycin (CN: 10 ^g; Liofilchem, Italy), nalidixic acid (NA:30 ^g; Liofilchem, Italy), erythromycin (E: 15 ^g; Liofilchem, Italy), and colistin sulfate (CS:10 ^g; Liofilchem, Italy).
Three to four colonies were suspended in 10 ml of 0.9% NaCl from a pure culture of each Salmonella isolate. The suspension was adjusted to match the turbidity standard of 0.5 McFarland units. Approximately 1 x 108 colony-forming units were streaked on MH agar plates using a sterile cotton swab, and the antibiotic discs were applied at the indicated doses. After aerobic incubation at 35°C for 20 h, the interpretation of the zones of inhibition was performed, and results were expressed as sensitive (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) according to the recommendation of SSNSHV (2011). An isolate was multidrug-resistant if it was resistant to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes (Zhang et al., 2018).
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were performed to compare proportions. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016 (USA).
RESULTS
Bacteriological and biochemical examination
Out of 180 chicken egg samples examined, 13 (7.22%) were found positive for Salmonella spp. Regarding the collection site, 2 (1.11%), 4 (2.22%), and 7 (3.88%) of Salmonella spp. isolates were identified from butchers, wholesalers, and street vendors, respectively (Table 1). The isolates produced typical red-colored colonies with black
201
centers on the XLD agar medium. Colorless colonies with black centers were also produced on SS agar medium. Biochemical characterization performed on API 20 E revealed that all the isolates were positive for lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, hydrogen sulfide, glucose, mannose, sorbitol, rhamnose, melibiose, and arabinose. In contrast, o-nitrophenyl-b-D-galactopyranoside, arginine dihydrolase, citrate, urease, Tryptophan deaminase, Indole, Voges-Proskauer test, gelatinase, inositol, sucrose, and amygdalin tests were negatives.
Antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. isolates
Salmonella isolates were tested against seven antibiotics. The results of susceptibility testing are illustrated in Table 2. All the isolates were resistant to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ampicillin, nalidixic acid, and erythromycin and immediately resistant to tetracycline. However, colistin sulfate and gentamycin were more effective against Salmonella isolates with 100% sensitivity. Regarding the multidrug-resistance results, all the isolates were resistant to three antimicrobial classes (Macrolide, Beta-lactam, and Quinolone); this means that 100% of the isolates were multidrug-resistant.
Table 1. Percentage of detected Salmonella spp. in different outlets isolated from commercial eggs in Tiaret, Algeria Collection site Number of examined samples Number of Positive (%)
Groceries 45 00 Butchers 45 2 (1.11) Wholesalers 45 4 (2.22) Street vendors 45 7 (3.88) Total_180_13 (7.22)_
Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility results for 13 Salmonella spp. isolated from commercial eggs in Tiaret, Algeria
Antimicrobial agent Disc concentration (^g) S Salmonella spp. isolates (n=13) I R Percentage of resistance
Ampicillin 5 0 0 13 100
Amoxicillin + acide Clavulanique 10 0 0 13 100
Tetracycline 30 0 13 0 0
Gentamycin 10 13 0 0 0
Nalidixic acid 30 0 0 13 100
Erythromycin 15 0 0 13 100
Colistin sulfate 10 13 0 0 0
S: Sensitive, I: Intermediate, R: Resistant.
DISCUSSION
Salmonella has been the primary cause of the foodborne salmonellosis pandemic in humans over the last 20 years, during which egg products were the most often identified vehicle of the infection (Moosavy et al., 2015; Long et al., 2017). Over the past decades, the improper and uncontrolled use of antibiotics has allowed the appearance of strains of Salmonella with multiple drug resistance in many countries (Ben Salem et al., 2012; Nacer et al., 2022; Samy et al., 2022). For that reason, the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella has become a matter of concern worldwide due to the significant threat that can present to public health (Wu and Hulme, 2021).
Considering the overall number of eggs collected, the results of the present study demonstrated that, of the 180 samples analyzed, 13 isolates of Salmonella spp. were detected at the rate of 7.22%. This partially agrees with the results shown by Hossain et al. (2019), who reported that the overall prevalence of Salmonella in the Naogaon district of Bangladesh was recorded as 7.78%, whereas 5.56% was on eggshell surfaces and 2.22% was on egg contents. In addition, Xie et al. (2019) found that 7.6% and 3.2% of farm and market egg samples were contaminated with Salmonella in Guangdong, China. In contrast, to the present findings, Zubair et al. (2017) reported that out of the 350 eggs analyzed, 17 (4.85%) samples of eggshells were found contaminated with Salmonella spp. and none of the egg content samples were contaminated with this bacterium. The same results were reported by Mansour et al. (2015) who recorded a total absence of Salmonella in the egg content samples. These observed variations can be explained by the different approaches used for the choice of samples (eggshell or egg content), and the methods used to isolate and identify the microorganism.
Regarding the detection rate of the bacterium with retail outlets, the street vendors presented the highest rate of salmonella contamination in relation to other outlets at 3.88%, followed by wholesalers and butchers at 2.22% and 1.11%, respectively. However, a complete absence of bacteria was noticed in grocery stores. It was suggested that street vendors' poor storage and marketing conditions may be the cause of the high level of egg contamination. Indeed, the egg's duration and storage temperature may have a disproportionate impact on subsequent contamination (Gantois et al., 2009).
202
Antimicrobial susceptibility results of Salmonella spp. isolated from table eggs marketed in the Tiaret area revealed that all strains (100%) were resistant to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ampicillin, nalidixic acid, and erythromycin. Several studies have reported different resistance rates; Islam et al. (2018) recorded that 94.44% and 77.78% of the Salmonella strains isolated from table eggs were resistant to amoxicillin and ampicillin, respectively. Likewise, Hossain et al. (2019) demonstrated resistance rates of 92.86% and 71.42% for amoxicillin and ampicillin, respectively. Unlike the present results, Xie et al. (2019) reported in a study carried out in China lower resistance rates of 12.96%, 37.04%, and 59.26% against nalidixic acid, amoxicillin, and ampicillin, respectively. The high rate of resistance found in this study can be related to the improper and uncontrolled use of these drugs in treating and controlling respiratory and digestive infections in poultry.
However, the results of the current study showed that all isolates were susceptible to gentamycin, tetracycline, and colistin sulfate. Several studies have reported different resistance rates to these antibiotics; Islam et al. (2018) recorded a resistance rate of 22.22% for gentamycin. In addition, Xie et al. (2019) reported low resistance to gentamycin with a rate of 18.52%, and higher resistance to tetracycline, with a rate of 42.59%. In contrast, the Zubair et al. (2017) group isolated 17 Salmonella strains from 350 analyzed table eggs and showed that all isolated strains were susceptible to gentamycin and colistin sulfate. These differences could be explained by the fact that each country has applied various policies and interventions to control the use of antibiotics in poultry production.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the current study's findings showed, firstly, that Salmonella spp. is detected in table eggs marketed in the area of Tiaret, and the highest detection rate was observed for street vendors. Therefore, significant attention should be paid to guaranteeing good quality eggs to the consumer, as Salmonella is considered one of the most important causes of human foodborne illness. Secondly, all Salmonella spp. isolates were resistant to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ampicillin, and nalidixic acid, while they were all susceptible to gentamycin, tetracycline, and colistin sulfate. The current study's authors suggest that the highest rate of resistance was observed for commonly used antibiotics compared to those used in specific poultry production cases. The overuse and misuse of antibiotics should be avoided in layer farms, as they are considered the main factors in the development of antibiotic resistance.
DECLARATIONS Funding
The laboratory of hygiene and animal pathology, university of Tiaret, Algeria, financially supported this work. Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the staff of the laboratory of hygiene and animal pathology, university of Tiaret, for their excellent technical support.
Authors' contributions
Rachid Merati contributed to the conception, design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Abdellatif Boudra contributed to the editing and writing the final draft of the manuscript. All authors approved the analyzed data and the last revised article.
Competing interests
The authors confirm that the data presented do not represent any conflict of interest. Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Ethical consideration
Ethical issues (including plagiarism, consent to publish, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and submission, and redundancy) have been checked by all the authors.
REFERENCES
Ali NM and Mohamed FM (2020). Association of antiseptic resistance gene (qacEAl) with class 1 intégrons in Salmonella isolated from broiler chickens. Journal of World's Poultry Research, 10(2S): 214-222. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.36380/iwpr.2020.27 Almashhadany DA (2019). Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolates from grilled chicken meat sold at retail outlets in Erbil City, Kurdistan region, Iraq. Italian Journal of Food Safety, 8(2): 8233. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4081/iifs.2019.8233
Bahness MM, Fathy A, and Alamin MA (2015). Identification of human and animal Salmonella spp. isolated in Nigeria region and
203
control of it. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(1): 1014-1022. Available at: http://www.iournaliiar.com/uploads/833 IJAR-4895.pdf
Ben Salem I, Mzoughi R, and Aouni M (2012). Laboratory typing methods for diagnostic of Salmonella Strains, the old organism that continued challenges. In: B. M. S. Mahmoud (Editor), Salmonella a dangerous foodborne pathogen. InTech., Croatia. pp. 350372. Available at: https://b2n.ir/u08569
Castro-Vargas RE, Herrera-Sánchez MP, Rodríguez-Hernández R, and Rondón-Barragán IS (2020). Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry: A global overview. Veterinary World, 13(10): 2070-2084. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.2070-2084
Finstad S, O'Bryan CA, Marcy JA, Crandall PG, and Ricke SC (2012). Salmonella and broiler processing in the United States: Relationship to foodborne salmonellosis. Food Research International, 45(2): 789-794. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/i.foodres.2011.03.057 Fourar D (2019). Intoxications alimentaires. Algerie Presse Service. Article de presse 5 Juin 2019. Available at: https://fr.allafrica.com/stories/201906060791.html
Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, Gast R, Humphrey TJ, and Van Immerseel F (2009). Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 33(4): 718-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/n574-6976.2008.0016Lx
Hossain MS, Hossain KM, Sarker MM, and Hamid SA (2019). Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella from chicken eggs in Naogaon district of Bangladesh. Journal of Advances in Microbiology, 19(2): 1-6. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.9734/iamb/2019/v19i230187 Islam M, Sabrin MS, Kabir MHB, and Aftabuzzaman M (2018). Antibiotic sensitivity and resistant pattern of bacteria isolated from table eggs of commercial layers considering food safety issue. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 4(4): 323329. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3329/aimbr.v4i4.40103 ISO (2002). Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuff-horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella, ISO 6579: 2002, Geneva. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/29315 .html
Long M, Yu H, Chen L, Wu G, Zhao S, Deng W, Chen S, Zhou K, Liu S, He Li et al. (2017). Recovery of Salmonella isolated from eggs and the commercial layer farms. Gut Pathogens, 9: 74. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0223-8
Mansour AFA, Zayed AF, and Bacha OAA (2015). Contamination of the shell and internal content of table eggs with pathogens during different storage periods. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal, 61(146): 8-15. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.21608/avmi.2015.169765
Merati R, Boudra A, Hammoudi A, and Aggad H (2020). Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens affected by colibacillosis in Tiaret province. Journal of the Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 44(2): 75-80. DOI: https://www. doi. org/10.13041 /ipvm.2020.44.2.75
Mirzaei A, Razavi SA, Babazade D, Laven R, Saeed M (2022). Roles of probiotics in farm animals: A review. Farm Animal Health
and Nutrition, 1(1): 17-25. Available at: https://fahn.rovedar. com/article 160928.html Moosavy MH, Esmaeili S, Bagheri Amiri F, Mostafavi E, and Zahraei Salehi T (2015). Detection of Salmonella spp. in commercial eggs in Iran. Iranian Journal of Microbiology, 7(1): 50-54. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670468/
Nacer S, El Ftouhy FZ, Derqaoui S, Khayli M, Nassik S, and Lkhider M (2022). Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from broiler chicken meat in modern and traditional slaughterhouses of Morocco. World's Veterinary Journal, 12(4): 430-439. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.54203/scil.2022.wvi53
Samy AA, Arafa AA, Hedia RH, and Ibrahim ES (2022). Multiple drug resistance Salmonella and antibiotic residues in Egyptian animal products. World's Veterinary Journal, 12(4): 363-373. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.54203/scil.2022.wvi46
Standardization of susceptibility to the national scale human and veterinary (SSNSHV) (2011). Algerian network monitoring the resistance of bacteria to antibiotics with the collaboration of world health organization, 6th Edition. p. 192. Available at: https://docplayer.fr/27601032-Standardisation-de-l-antibiogramme-a-l-echelle-nationale.html
Thorns CJ (2000). Bacterial foodborne zoonoses. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 19(1): 226239. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.20506/rst. 19.1.1219
World health organization (WHO) (2014). Antimicrobial resistance: Global report on surveillance. Geneva: World health organization. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/112642
World health organization (WHO) (2018). Salmonella (non-typhoidal). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-
sheets/detail/salmonella-(non-typhoidal) Wu S and Hulme JP (2021). Recent advances in the detection of antibiotic and multi-drug resistant Salmonella: An update.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(7): 3499. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/iims22073499 Xie T, Wu G, He X, Lai Z, Zhang H, and Zhao J (2019). Antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica from eggs. Food Science & Nutrition, 7(9): 2847-2853. DOI: https://www. doi. org/10. 1002/fsn3.1126
Yang X, Huang J, Wu Q, Zhang J, Liu S, Guo W, Cai S, and Yu S (2015). Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Salmonella isolated from retail ready-to-eat foods in China. Food Control, 60: 50-56. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/i.foodcont.2015.07.019
Zhang L, Fu Y, Xiong Z, Ma Y, Wei Y, Qu X, Zhang H, Zhang J, and Liao M (2018). Highly prevalent multidrug-resistant Salmonella from chicken and pork meat at retail markets in Guangdong, China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9: 2104. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02104 Zubair AI, Al-Berfkani MI, and Issa AR (2017). Prevalence of Salmonella species from poultry eggs of local stores in Duhok. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(6): 2468-2471. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.iirms20172430
204
