CC BY
82023, Scienceline Publication
World's Veterinary Journal
World Vet J, 13(1): 167-174, March 25, 2023
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.54203/scil.2023.wvj17
Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli and Salmonella Species Isolated from Table Eggs in Morocco
Fatima Zahra El Ftouhy1'2'* Abdelaziz Hmyene1 © , Sabrine Nacer2'3 © , Ahlam Kadiri © , Nadia Charrat
©
Asma Fagrach © , Sophia Derqaoui © , and Saadia Nassik2
'Laboratory of Biochemistry, Environment and Agri-food, Faculty of Science and Technology Mohammedia, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco
2Avian Pathology Unit, Department of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Hassan II Agronomic and Veterinary Institute, Rabat, Morocco 3Laboratory of Virology, Oncology, Biosciences, Environment, and New Energies, Faculty of Science and Technology Mohammedia, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco
4Microbiology Immunology and Contagious Diseases Unit, Department of Veterinary Pathology and Public Health, Hassan II Agronomic and Veterinary Institute, Rabat, Morocco
5Department of Food and Environmental Microbiology of the Royal Gendarmery, Rabat, Morocco *Corresponding author's Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The development of antimicrobial resistance has become a severe global public health emergency. Foods of animal origin are considered possible drivers of resistant bacteria, including Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Salmonella spp. It is associated with the indiscriminate use of antibiotics, resulting in the inability to treat patients infected with antibiotic-resistant pathogens and a high risk of transmission of these resistant pathogens. The current study aimed to determine the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of E. coli and Salmonella spp. in raw table eggs in Morocco. A total of 870 table eggs resulting from 290 samples (3 eggs = 1 sample), were purchased from ambulatory sellers, street vendors, kiosks, and neighborhood markets from different cities in Morocco and transferred to the laboratory in the Hassan II Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine Institute of Rabat, Morocco. The egg shells and contents were tested separately then the isolation and identification of bacterial pathogens were performed according to the Moroccan Standard Norms. The bacterial isolates were tested for susceptibility to six commonly used antibiotics, namely nalidixic acid (30 ^g), kanamycin (30 ^g), gentamycin (15 ^g), ciprofloxacin (15 ^g), tetracycline (30 ^g), and amoxicillin (10 ^g). The findings revealed that 38 samples (13%) tested positive for E. coli of which 9% were on egg shells, and 4% were in egg content, while for Salmonella enteritidis (S. enteritidis), 5 samples (2%) tested positive and only in the egg contents. Escherichia coli showed the highest resistance to amoxicillin, followed by tetracycline and nalidixic acid with 92.10%, 84.21%, and 50%, respectively, and was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (84.21%), kanamycin (65.79%), and gentamicin (60.54%). Salmonella enteritidis had the highest resistance against tetracycline (80%), followed by ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid with 40% each. The highest sensitivity rates of S. enteritidis were for gentamicin, amoxicillin, and kanamycin at 80%, 80%, and 40%, respectively. Given that these resistant bacteria could potentially be transferred to humans through eggs or egg products, it is necessary to employ strict hygiene measures and provide a wise and legal use of antibiotics in animal breeding.
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis, Table egg INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the world's most challenging problems today (WHO, 2021). The inappropriate use of antibiotics, including their use in animal production systems as growth promoters and their overuse in clinical treatments, has created selective pressure on bacteria in recent years leading to defense systems against these antibiotics and a therapeutic impasse (Zhao et al., 2012; Roca et al., 2015; Zwe et al., 2018). It is estimated that AMR leads to the annual death of approximately 700,000 people worldwide (Clifford et al., 2018). These resistant bacteria may contaminate humans directly through cross-contamination or/and handling of contaminated food or indirectly when contaminated food or food products are consumed (Collignon et al., 2016; Lambrecht et al., 2018).
Among the foods responsible for AMR transmission, poultry, and poultry products act as the primary vector for transferring antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and antimicrobial-resistance genes to humans (de Mesquita Souza Saraiva et al., 2022) since the inappropriate use of antibiotics as a treatment and growth promoters at sub-therapeutic doses can lead to their development. However, many bacteria are isolated from poultry meats and products, WHO considers Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli (E. coli) as the most responsible bacteria for AMR transmission (WHO, 2021). These two bacteria have been shown to cause major infectious diseases in both poultry and humans. The E. coli is the main causative agent of cellulitis, septicemia, and aerosacculitis in poultry, and Salmonella spp. is the causative agent of
167
ISSN 2322-4568
> R i.
e i
P v
e ft
d :
0
1 —
G
HH
2 A L
A R
2 C 2
o
L
E
pullorum disease, avian typhoid, and avian paratyphoid (Gomis et al., 1997). In addition to mild to severe gastrointestinal diseases, E. coli can cause urinary tract infections, pneumonia, meningitis, and peritonitis in humans (Schoeni and Doyle, 1994). Salmonella spp. can also cause human foodborne gastroenteritis, a disease characterized by intestinal inflammation and self-limited diarrhea (Winter et al., 2010).
Moreover, E. coli and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars are the most common avian pathogens that can be vertically transmitted through eggs (Singh et al., 2010). Many studies have isolated Salmonella spp. and E. coli from eggs (Adesiyun et al., 2005; Stepien, 2010; El ftouhy et al., 2022), and several egg-borne outbreaks of salmonellosis have been reported (Guerra-Centeno et al., 2020), considering eggs a possible vehicle for resistant bacteria and genes.
In Morocco, despite the increasing demand for the production (5.5 billion units in 2020, according to FISA) and consumption of table eggs, there is a lack of information on their microbiological quality, foodborne pathogens, and AMR, particularly E. coli and Salmonella enteritidis (S. enteritidis), isolated from eggs or egg products. Also, previous studies have demonstrated that treatment failures were linked to reports of increased antimicrobial resistance (Filali et al., 1988; Amara et al., 1995). Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the occurrence and the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. and E. coli in fresh table eggs in Morocco.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethical approval
All procedures in the present study were carried out following the Hassan II Agronomic and Veterinary Institute of Rabat, Morocco, and Moroccan Ministry of Agriculture recommendations, which are in accordance with international ethical standards (European Union Directive 2010/63/EU) legislation and ARRIVE (Animal Research Reporting of in vivo Experiments) guidelines.
Sample collection
A total of 870 table eggs, resulting from 290 samples of 3 eggs each, were purchased from ambulatory sellers, street vendors, kiosks, and neighborhood markets from January to September 2021. Eggs were kept under ambient temperature on the markets. Samples were collected from different locations in Morocco, namely Kenitra, Sale, Rabat, Temara, Mohammedia, Casablanca, and Benslimane. Once collected, eggs were transferred aseptically to the microbiology laboratory of the Avian Pathology Unit at the Hassan II Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine Institute in Rabat, Morocco, to run different analyses for egg shells and contents.
Egg shells
A swab technique was applied. The surface of the whole eggs was aseptically swabbed with a sterile cotton swab moistened in a sterile distilled water solution (Adesiyun et al., 2005).
Egg content
Eggs were soaked in 70% ethanol for 5-10 seconds to disinfect and then air-dried near the Bunsen burner. Then, the egg contents (3 eggs) were decanted and pooled into a sterile stomacher bag before finally being mixed manually for 30 seconds to obtain a homogeneous mixture. Both swabs and a mixture of egg contents were used separately to inoculate 9 ml of water peptone buffer and incubated at 37°C for 18-24 hours (Adabara et al., 2020).
Isolation of Salmonella
For Salmonella spp. isolation, 0.1 ml of the pre-inoculated buffered peptone water (CM 0509 Oxoid, Oxoid LTD, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) was transferred to 10 ml of Rappaport-Vassiliadis Soja (RVS; BK148HA Biokar diagnostics, Zac de Ther, France) and incubated at 42°C for 24 hours. A loopful of RVS was transferred to Xylose lysine deoxycholate (BK058HA Biokar diagnostics, Zac de Ther, France) agar and incubated at 37°C for 24-48 hours according to the Moroccan standard NM ISO 6579, 2007 (NM 08.0.103), which is similar to the international Norm (ISO, 2002).
Isolation of Escherichia coli
For E. coli, a loopful of the broth water peptone buffer was subcultured on Eosin Methylene Blue agar (EMB agar; CM 0069 Oxoid, Oxoid LTD, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) and then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours (Siriporn et al., 2015). All isolated bacteria were identified according to their colony, color, shape, morphology, and color change of the culture media. They were also dye-stained with Gram stains and examined under a x 100 light microscope (OPTIKA B-151, ITALY) using oil immersion. In addition, the performed biochemical tests included coagulase (6BR0020, Biokar diagnostics, Zac de Ther, France), catalase (1840, SOLVAPUR, SOLVACHIM, Morocco), oxidase (MICROBAT Oxoid LTD, United Kingdom), and motility tests using Mannitol Motility Nitrate Medium (M1320, HI Media laboratories,
168
Mumbai, India). The semisolid nature of this medium helps to detect motility due to 0.35% agar. This detection was also confirmed by API 20E (20 100, biomerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France) for further biochemical identification (Abdullah, 2010).
Antibiotic sensitivity tests
Individual colonies of confirmed isolates of S. enteritidis and E. coli spp. were suspended in normal saline to McFarland standards of 0.5 and then were inoculated onto the Mueller-Hinton agar surface (Bk048HA Biokar diagnostics zac de ther, France). Antibiotic discs were aseptically placed on the inoculation medium with sterile forceps and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation, the inhibition zone diameter around the antibiotic discs was measured, and sensitivity was determined. Results were interpreted later according to the criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (CLSI, WEINSTEIN, 2018). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed against six antibiotics of nalidixic acid (30 ^g), kanamycin (30 ^g), gentamycin (15 ^g), ciprofloxacin (15 ^g), tetracycline (30 ^g), and amoxicillin (10 ^g) purchased from Oxoid LTD, England. These antibiotics were selected according to their availability on the market and everyday use in the poultry industry worldwide.
Statistical analysis
The data obtained in this study were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 22). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's test were used to determine significant differences between eggshell and egg content contamination for each bacterium studied. The p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results were also calculated and presented as a percentage using Excel spreadsheets.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The table egg is a major food in the human diet due to its high nutritional value, availability, and low cost. However, it can be contaminated with harmful bacteria leading to serious foodborne diseases. The obtained results of the current study revealed that 15% of the samples tested positive for microbial contamination. Among them, 38 samples (13%) tested positive for E. coli, and 5 samples (2%) for S. enteritidis (Table 1).
The presence of E. coli in eggs taken from different sites in the present study may result from poor sanitary practices and conditions since E. coli is an indicator of hygienic quality (Carter and Cole, 1990). The results indicated that the prevalence rates of E. coli isolated from egg shells and egg contents were 9% and 4%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the contamination of the shells and the contents (p < 0.05) since this bacterium commonly contaminates the surface of eggs. As previously reported, the bacteria most frequently isolated from egg shells are Gramnegative bacteria, such as E. coli (Papadopoulou et al., 1997; Musgrove et al., 2004). The presence of this bacterium in the eggshell more than in the egg content can be explained by the fact that the eggs are supposed to be sterile due to their defense system (USDA, 2011).
The detection of E. coli in the shell may be due to the presence of feces, soil, dust, poor hygienic conditions during manipulation, contaminated egg crates, transportation, and commercialization, while the contamination recorded in the egg contents of the examined samples may be attributed to the fact that the laying hens are carriers of the pathogen before the shell formation (Gantois et al., 2009). Dirt in the nests can also contaminate the egg shells; therefore, the pathogen can move from the outside to the inside of the egg (USDA, 2011).
Several studies on different parts of the world, including Bangladesh (Haque et al., 2021), India (Arathy et al., 2009), Egypt (Mansour et al., 2015), Nigeria (Adabara et al., 2020), and South Africa (Jambalang et al., 2017) have revealed the presence of E. coli in table eggs. The same prevalence of E. coli in egg shells found in this study was previously reported in farm eggs in Nigeria (9.1%, Adabara et al., 2020). Regarding the egg shells, the prevalence of E. coli was detected in Zambia (Kapena et al., 2020), and Thailand (Siriporn et al., 2015). Besides, E. coli was isolated from egg contents in several previous studies conducted in Trinidad, Egypt, and Nigeria (Adesiyun et al., 2005; Mansour et al., 2015; Adabara et al., 2020).
The isolation rate of S. enteritidis in the table eggs tested was 2%. This prevalence was only observed in the egg contents since the shells were S. enteritidis free; therefore, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The findings of the present study suggest that during the egg-laying process, the egg passes through the common part of the reproductive and digestive tracts where contamination may occur. In addition, the existence of S. enteritidis in the hen's ovary or oviduct (prior to shell formation) may also result in its presence in the egg contents (Gantois et al., 2009).
The absence of S. enteritidis on the shell can be attributed to the fact that poultry farmers practice strict hygiene during handling, transport, and marketing. These findings are supported by previous studies that showed the presence of Salmonella spp. and Salmonella enteritidis in table eggs (Islam et al., 2018; Hai et al., 2020; Haque et al., 2021).
169
In Nigeria, analyses of egg contents from farms revealed the presence of 1.5% Salmonella spp. (Okorie-Kanu et al., 2016). In contrast to the present findings, some studies demonstrated the presence of Salmonella spp. in the egg shells purchased from street vendors and directly from farms (Arathy et al., 2009; Siriporn et al., 2015; Kapena et al., 2020).
The higher contamination of E. coli compared to S. enteritidis observed in this study could be explained by poor sanitary practices of farmers during egg handling, by the presence of excreta on eggs or by dust in the environment.
The presence of these microorganisms (E. coli and S. enteritidis) outside and inside of the egg (content and eggshell) is significant for public health since people consume table eggs at all ages (Rehault-Godbert et al., 2019).
Egg contamination can happen due to different factors, including poultry droppings, moist and warm bedding, dirt in the nest, dust, a highly contaminated environment, poor handling of eggs by farmers and their dirty clothes, poor transportation method, poor storage in stores where these eggs are sold (humidity), unhygienic handling conditions by sellers (De Reu et al., 2005).
In addition, the hen may carry the pathogen and transfer it to the egg contents inside the reproductive system. Contaminated egg crates may also contaminate the shell, and consequently, the bacteria may translocate to the egg contents through the pores of the shell over time (Musgrove et al., 2009).
Table 1. Distribution of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis contaminations in raw table eggs of Morocco from January to September 2021
Number of samples Isolation of pathogens (%) Escherichia coli Salmonella enteritidis
Eggshell (%) Egg content (%) Eggshell (%) Egg content (%)
290 9% 4% - 2%
Antibiogram study
The in-vitro antibiotic sensitivity test results indicated that the isolated E. coli had the highest resistance to amoxicillin, followed by tetracycline and nalidixic acid with 92.10%, 84.21%, and 50%, respectively. On the other hand, this bacterium showed the maximum sensitivity to ciprofloxacin (84.21%), followed by kanamycin (65.79%), and gentamicin (60.54%, Table 2).
In the present study, S. enteritidis had the highest resistance patterns against tetracycline (80%), followed by ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid with 40% each. While gentamicin, amoxicillin, and kanamycin had the highest sensitivity rates of 80%, 80%, and 40%, respectively (Table 3).
Drug resistance continues to threaten public health, challenging the treatment of infectious diseases (WHO, 2021). In the current study, E. coli showed the highest resistance rates to amoxicillin, tetracycline, and nalidixic acid (92.10%, 84.21%, and 50%, respectively). The resistance rate to amoxicillin in this study agrees with previous studies that found that E. coli isolated from eggs were highly resistant to this antibiotic, with 90.1% and 88.89% of resistance (Rahmatallah et al., 2017; Ashish and Rajesh, 2017). The same is true for tetracycline resistance. Different studies recorded high rates of E. coli isolated from table eggs resistant to tetracycline with almost identical rates (Kapena et al., 2020, Haque et al., 2021). Regarding nalidixic acid resistance, a study conducted in Zambia showed that E. coli isolated from table eggs were resistant to nalidixic acid with a rate of 32.4% (Kapena et al., 2020). In contrast to the present study, a study in Bangladesh indicated that E. coli isolated from eggs were susceptible to this antibiotic with a rate of 44.44% (Islam et al., 2018). Of the 6 antibiotics, isolated E. coli showed the greatest sensitivity to ciprofloxacin, followed by gentamycin and kanamycin. Some studies have reported sensitivity to these antibiotics at a rate of 100% for each (Ashish and Rajesh, 2017; Islam et al., 2018; Adabara et al., 2020).
The resistance to tetracycline and amoxicillin could be partly attributed to the historical use of these antimicrobial classes in aviculture, resulting in antibiotic resistance development of the bacteria over time (Okorie-Kanu et al., 2016). The susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and kanamycin could be attributed to the increased cost of these drugs, leading to their reduced use in poultry production (Okorie-Kanu et al., 2016).
The aforementioned results showed notable resistance rates of S. enteritidis to tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and nalidixic acid: 80%, 40%, and 40%, respectively. A Moroccan study was conducted in 2016 to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. isolates in Moroccan laying hens. The findings indicated that S. enteritidis was only resistant to nalidixic acid at a rate of 37.5%, meaning that the resistance in Morocco is increasing (Ziyate et al., 2016). Apart from tetracycline resistance, the present results disagree with reports from similar studies where Salmonella spp. isolated from table eggs were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid (Okorie-Kanu et al., 2016; Islam et al., 2018; Kapena et al., 2020).
The noted susceptibility of S. enteritidis to gentamicin (80%) recorded during the present investigation was in line with the findings reported in an Egyptian study that reported a 90.9% of susceptible Salmonella spp. isolated from layer farms in Egypt (Diab et al., 2019). Concerning amoxicillin sensibility, a study conducted in Rajshahi found a rate of 76.47% of S. enteritidis isolated from eggs (Islam et al., 2018). Finally, previous studies conducted in Ethiopia and Egypt revealed the susceptibility of Salmonella isolated from eggs against kanamycin at 91% and 95.5% (Tessema et al.,
170
2017; Diab et al., 2019). The uncontrolled, random, and repeated use of antibiotics in chicken farming worldwide may lead to the development and growth of resistant bacteria (Diab et al., 2019). For example, tetracycline was used for years to one-day-old chickens against Salmonella and E. coli, leading to its resistance to both antibiotics (Ekperigin et al., 1983; Lutful Kabir, 2010). Ciprofloxacin also belongs to the group of fluoroquinolones that have a rapid bactericidal action against Salmonella spp. Fluoroquinolones are widely used to treat salmonellosis in humans and animals (Folster et al., 2015) and be useful for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant strains (Barnass et al., 1990). Therefore, its overuse may explain the high resistance observed in this study (Diab et al., 2019). Cross-resistance can also explain resistance to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid, as they are concrete examples of such resistance. When bacteria develop resistance to ciprofloxacin, they may also develop resistance to nalidixic acid because both drugs inhibit topoisomerase, a key enzyme in DNA replication (Perichon and Courvalin, 2009). On the other hand, some antimicrobials are rarely recommended because their high cost may explain the high susceptibility rate noted above (Okorie-Kanu et al., 2016).
Most of the E. coli strains (60.5%) were found to be multidrug-resistant (MDR), as they showed resistance to three antibiotics tested. In the same context, several studies have reported that E. coli is an MDR bacterium that has shown resistance to three, five, or more antibiotics, including tetracycline, amoxicillin, trimethoprim sulfate, streptomycin, and doxycycline (Adesiyun et al., 2007; Eid et al., 2015).
Regarding S. enteritidis, the present study revealed that 60% of the isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic. In comparison, no MDR was detected, which agrees with a Moroccan study that revealed that 65.6% of Salmonella spp. strains were resistant to at least one antibiotic tested (Ziyate et al., 2016). This rate of multidrug resistance to antibiotics is most likely due to inappropriate use of treatment, either overuse, short treatment, or even misuse of these antibiotics (WHO, 2021).
The results were not surprising considering the range of antibiotics available in Morocco. The variation in susceptibility and resistance patterns may be due to the blinded use of antibiotics in poultry feed and poultry itself as prophylactic, therapeutic, and growth promoter agents since the farmers have unlimited and free access to antibiotics in Morocco (Rahmatallah et al., 2018).
In recent years, antibiotic-resistant bacteria have received considerable attention because they constitute an immediate risk to public health by increasing the incidence of overall hospitalizations and the risk of invasive infections and mortality (Verraes et al., 2013). They can lead to many consequences, such as the failure of medical treatments, including modern medicine. This is because surgical procedures and cancer chemotherapy would be compromised, the choice of antibiotics for treatment would be limited, and resistant gastrointestinal bacteria will gain an advantage when patients are treated with antibiotics for other medical reasons (Verraes et al., 2013). Furthermore, it has been experimentally proven that the genes conferring antibiotic resistance are easily transferable between normal flora, pathogenic E. coli and Salmonella spp. (Blake et al., 2003). Hence, antibiotic resistance in microorganisms from table eggs should be considered a significant public health hazard, as eggs can serve as a vector for transferring antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and genes to humans.
Table 2. Antibacterial sensitivity and resistant pattern of Escherichia coli isolated from eggs in Morocco from January to
September 2021
Number of samples tested Antibiotics Sensitivity pattern
Sensitive (%) Intermediate (%) Resistant (%)
Tetracycline 10.53 5.26 84.21
Nalidixic acid 44.74 5.26 50
Amoxicillin Kanamycin 5.26 2.64 92.10
65.79 13.16 21.05
Gentamycin 60.54 13.15 26.31
Ciprofloxacin 84.21 5.26 10.53
Table 3. Antibacterial sensitivity and resistant pattern of Salmonella enteritidis isolated from eggs in Morocco from
January to September 2021
Number of samples tested Antibiotics Sensitivity pattern
Sensitive (%) Intermediate (%) Resistant (%)
Tetracycline 20 0 80
Nalidixic acid 40 20 40
Amoxicillin Kanamycin 80 20 0
40 40 20
Gentamycin 80 20 0
Ciprofloxacin 20 40 40
171
CONCLUSION
This study concludes that table eggs marketed for human consumption in Morocco could be infected with antibiotic-resistant E. coli and S. enteritidis, especially tetracycline. These resistant bacteria could potentially be transmitted to consumers through eggs or egg products, which could have significant public health consequences which require a one-health approach to combat the threat. Therefore, further studies can be conducted to assess the potential spread of antibiotic resistance from foodborne pathogens to humans.
DECLARATIONS
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Mr. Chafik El Ghandour for his participation in the layout of the manuscript and thank Mr. SI Mustapha for his support during this experimental study.
Funding
This research was not funded and is currently part of an ongoing university Ph.D. thesis. Authors' contributions
Fatima Zahra El Ftouhy, Sabrine Nacer, Sophia Derqaoui, and Nadia Charrat collected the samples used in this study. Fatima Zahra El Ftouhy performed the bacterial isolation and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Fatima Zahra El Ftouhy and Asma Fagrach contributed to the data analysis. Fatima Zahra El Ftouhy wrote the original manuscript. Saadia Nassik, Abdelaziz Hmyene, and Ahlam Kadiri revised and generated the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper. Ethical consideration
All authors have checked and vetted the manuscript for ethical considerations, namely plagiarism, consent to publication, misconduct, fabrication and/or falsification of data, dual publication and/or submission, and redundancy.
Availability of data and materials
The authors declare that they have all the necessary data and are available where appropriate or requested by the editor.
REFERENCES
Abdullah IN (2010). Isolation and identification of some bacterial isolates from table egg. Al-Anbar Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 3(2): 59-67. Available at: https://www.iasj .net/iasj/download/2c367e9bd023e416
Adabara NU, Amarachi CE, Adedeji AS, Usman A, Maude M, Sadiq FU, Oloruntoba FP, and Kuta FA (2020). Studies of antibiotics resistance in bacteria isolated from retailed eggshell in three major markets in Minna, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 33(2): 37093719. Available at: http://www.doi.org/10.48198/NJPAS/20.A03
Adesiyun A, Ofiah N, Seepersadsingh N, Rodrigo S, Lashley V, and Musai L (2007). Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli isolated from table eggs. Food Control, 18(4): 306-311. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.10.013
Adesiyun A, Ofiah N, Seepersadsingh N, Rodrigo S, Lashley V, Musai L, and Georges K (2005). Microbial health risk posed by table eggs in Trinidad. Epidemiology and Infection, 133(6): 1049-1056. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268805004565
Amara A, Ziani Z, and Bouzoubaa K (1995). Antibioresistance of Escherichia coli strains isolated in Morocco from chickens with colibacillosis. Veterinary Microbiology, 43(4): 325-330. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(94)00101-2
Arathy S, Vanpee G, Belot G, Vanessa M, Claude D, and Ravindra NS (2009). Bacterial contamination of commercial chicken eggs in Grenada, West Indies. West Indian Veterinary Journal, 9(2): 4-7. Available at: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/med-17752
Ashish J and Rajesh Y (2017). Study of antibiotic resistance in bacteria isolated from table egg. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 8(1): 668-674. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.22376/ijpbs.2017.8.1.b668-674
Barnass S, Franklin J, and Tabaqchali S (1990). The successful treatment of multiresistant non-enteric salmonellosis with seven day oral ciprofloxacin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 25(2): 299-300. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jac/25.2.299
Blake DP, Hillman K, Fenlon DR, and Low JC (2003). Transfer of antibiotic resistance between commensal and pathogenic members of the Enterobacteriaceae under ileal conditions. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 95(3): 428-436. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01988.x
Carter GR and Cole RJJr (1990). Diagnostic procedures in veterinary bacteriology and mycology, 5th Edition. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, California. p. 307. Available at: https://handoutset.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Diagnostic-Procedure-in-Veterinary-Bacteriology-and-Mycology-Grace-R.-Carter-and-John-R.-Cole-Jr.-Eds..pdf
172
Clifford K, Desai D, Prazeres da Costa C, Meyer H, Klohe K, Winkler AS, Rahman T, Islam T, and Zaman MH (2018). Antimicrobial resistance in livestock and poor quality veterinary medicines. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 96(9): 662-664. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.209585
Collignon PJ, Conly JM, Andremont A, McEwen SA, Aidara-Kane A, World Health Organization Advisory Group, Bogotá Meeting on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (WHO-AGISAR), Agerso Y, Andremont A, Collignon P, Conly J et al. (2016). World Health Organization ranking of antimicrobials according to their importance in human medicine: A critical step for developing risk management strategies to control antimicrobial resistance from food animal production. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 63(8): 1087-1093. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1093/cid/ciw475
de Mesquita Souza Saraiva M, Lim K, do Monte DFM, Givisiez PEN, Alves LBR, de Freitas Neto OC, Kariuki S, Júnior AB, de Oliveira CJB, and Gebreyes WA (2022). Antimicrobial resistance in the globalized food chain: A one health perspective applied to the poultry industry. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 53(1): 465- 486. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s42770-021-00635-8
De Reu K Grijspeerdt K Heyndrickx M, Zoons J, De Baere K Uyttendaele M, Debevere J, and Herman L (2005). Bacterial eggshell contamination in conventional cages, furnished cages and aviary housing systems for laying hens. British Poultry Science, 46(2): 149-155. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071660500065359
Diab MS, Zaki RS, Ibrahim NA, and Abd El Hafez MS (2019). Prevalence of multidrug resistance non-typhoidal Salmonellae isolated from layer farms and humans in Egypt. World's Veterinary Journal, 9(4): 280-288. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.36380/scil.2019.wvj35
Eid S, Nasef S, and Erfan MA (2015). Multidrug resistant bacterial pathogens in eggs collected from backyard chickens. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal, 61(144): 87-103. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.21608/avmj.2015.170025
Ekperigin HE, Jang S, and McLapes RH (1983). Effective control of a gentamicin resistant Salmonella arizonae infection in turkey poults. Avian Diseases, 27(3): 822-829. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2307/1590326
El Ftouhy FZ, Nassik S, Nacer S, Kadiri A, Charrat N, Attrassi K, Fagrach A, Bahir MA, Derqaoui S, and Hmyene A (2022). Bacteriological quality of table eggs in Moroccan formal and informal sector. International Journal of Food Science, 2022: 6223404. DOI: https://www. doi.org/10.115 5/2022/6223404
Filali E, Bell JG, el Houadfi M, Huggins MB, and Cook JK (1988). Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli strains isolated from chickens with colisepticaemia in Morocco. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 11(2): 121-124. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/0147-9571(88)90027-6
Folster JP, Campbell D, Grass J, Brown AC, Bicknese A, Tolar B, Joseph LA, Plumblee JR, Walker C, Fedorka-Cray PJ et al. (2015). Identification and characterization of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Albert isolates in the United States. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 59(5): 2774-2779. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.05183-14
Gantois I, Ducatelle R, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, Gast R Humphrey TJ, and Van Immerseel F (2009). Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella enteritidis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 33(4): 718-738. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00161.x
Gomis SM, Goodhope R Kumor L, Caddy N, Riddell C, Petter AA, and Allan JJ (1997). Experimental reproduction of Escherichia coli, cellulitis, and septicemia in broiler chickens. Avian Diseases, 41(1): 234-240. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2307/1592464
Guerra-Centeno D, Díaz-Rodríguez M, Valdez-Sandoval C, Lepe-López M, Alvarez E, Aguilar Ch, Hernández C, and Borja J (2020). Influenza A, and Salmonella spp. in backyard poultry eggs in Guatemala city. Journal of World's Poultry Research, 10(2): 336-341. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.36380/jwpr.2020.38
Hai D, Yin X, Lu Z, Lv F, Zhao H, and Bie X (2020). Occurrence, drug resistance, and virulence genes of Salmonella isolated from chicken and eggs. Food Control, 113: 107109. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107109
Haque MH, Rahman MM, Miah ML, Ahmed S, Sazib MRI, Khaton R Kabir A, and Uddin MN (2021). Exploring antibiotic resistance pattern of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus spp. isolated from eggs in Rajshahi. European Journal of Agriculture & Food Sciences, 3(4): 25-30. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.24018/ejfood.2021.3.4.328
Islam M, Sabrin MS, Kabir MHB, and Aftabuzzaman M (2018). Antibiotic sensitivity and resistant pattern of bacteria isolated from table eggs of commercial layers considering food safety issue. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 4(4): 323-329. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3329/ajmbr.v4i4.40103
Jambalang AR Buys EM, and Botha FS (2017). Bacterial species from retailed poultry eggs in Tshwane, South Africa: Implication for consumers. South African Journal of Science, 113(11-12): 1-7. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20160232
Kapena MS, Muma JB, Mubita CM, and Munyeme M (2020). Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Salmonella in raw retail table eggs in Lusaka, Zambia. Veterinary World, 13(11): 2528-2533. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.2528-2533
Lambrecht E, Van Meervenne E, Boon N, Van de Wiele T, Wattiau P, Herman L, Heyndrickx M, and Van Coillie E (2018). Characterization of cefotaxime- and ciprofloxacin-resistant commensal Escherichia coli originating from Belgian farm animals indicates high antibiotic resistance transfer rates. Microbial Drug Resistance, 24(6): 707-717. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1089/mdr.2017.0226
Lutful Kabir SM (2010). Avian colibacillosis and salmonellosis: A closer look at epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, control and public health concerns. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(1): 89-114. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7010089
Mansour AFA, Zayed AF, and Basha OLAAA (2015). Contamination of the shell and internal content of table eggs with some pathogens during different storage periods. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal, 61(146): 8-15. Available at: https://avmj.journals.ekb.eg/article_169774_b655f13a850178f39a60bc237e807519.pdf
Musgrove MT, Jones DR, Northcutt JK, Cox NA, and Harrison MA (2004). Identification of Enterobacteriaceae from washed and unwashed commercial shell eggs. Journal of Food Protection, 67(11): 2613-2616. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-67.11.2613
Musgrove MT, Jones DR, Shaw JD, Sheppard M, and Harrison MA (2009). Enterobacteriaceae and related organisms isolated from nest run cart shelves in commercial shell egg processing facilities. Poultry Science, 88(10): 2113-2117. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00021
Okorie-Kanu OJ, Ezenduka EV, Okorie-Kanu CO, Ugwu LC, and Nnamani UJ (2016). Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. in retail raw table eggs sold for human consumption in Enugu state, Nigeria. Veterinary World, 9(11): 1312-1319. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.1312-1319
Papadopoulou C, Dimitriou D, Levidiotou S, Gessouli H, Panagiou A, Golegou S, and Antoniades G (1997). Bacterial strains isolated from eggs and their resistance to currently used antibiotics: Is there a health hazard for consumers?. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 20(1): 35-40. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9571(96)00024-0
Périchon B and Courvalin P (2009). Antibiotic resistance. Encyclopedia of Microbiology, pp. 193-204. Available at: https://b2n.ir/j40838
Rahmatallah N, El Rhaffouli H, Lahlou Amine I, Sekhsokh Y, Fassi Fihri O, and El Houadfi M (2018). Consumption of antibacterial molecules in broiler production in Morocco. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 4(2): 80-90. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.89
173
Rahmatallah N, Nassik S, El-Rhaffouli H, Lahlou AI, and El-Houadfi M (2017). Detection of multi-resistant strains of Escherichia coli of avian origin in the Rabat-Salé-Zemmour-Zaer region. Moroccan Journal of Agronomic and Veterinary Science, 5: 96-102.
Réhault-Godbert S, Guyot N, and Nys Y (2019). The golden egg: Nutritional value, bioactivities, and emerging benefits for human health. Nutrients, 11(3): 684. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/nu11030684
Roca I, Akova M, Baquero F, Carlet J, Cavaleri M, Coenen S, Cohen J, Findlay D, Gyssens I, Heure OE et al. (2015). The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: Science for intervention. New Microbes and New Infections, 6: 22-29. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1016/j .nmni .2015.02.007
Salihu MD, Garba B, and Isah Y (2015). Evaluation of microbial contents of table eggs at retail outlets in Sokoto metropolis, Nigeria. Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 13(1): 22-28. DOI: http://www.doi .org/10.4314/sokjvs.v13i1.4
Schoeni JL and Doyle MP (1994). Variable colonization of chickens per orally inoculated with Escherichia coli O157: H7 and subsequent contamination of eggs. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 60(8): 2958-2962. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1128/aem.60.8.2958-2962.1994
Singh B, Yadav AK, Siddiqui MZ, Chandra M, Agrawal RV, and Singh M (2010). Prevalence of multiple drug-resistant Salmonella and Escherichia coli in table eggs. Indian Journal of Comparative Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, 31: 75-77. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Prevalence-of-multiple-drug-resistant-Salmonella-E.-Singh-Yadav/bd333bf1c91861b902bd251949cebd7aedbafb5d
Siriporn C, Ali A, and Anil KA (2015). Isolation of total aerobic and pathogenic bacteria from table eggs and its contents. Food and Applied Biosciences Journal, 3(1): 1-9. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.14456/fabj .2015.1
Stepien PD (2010). Occurrence of gram-negative bacteria in hens' eggs depending on their source and storage conditions. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 13(3): 507-513. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21033566/
Suresh T, Hatha AA, Sreenivasan D, Sangeetha N, and Lashmanaperumalsamy P (2006). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enteritidis and other salmonellas in the eggs and egg-storing trays from retail markets of Coimbatore, South India. Food Microbiology, 23(3): 294-299. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2005.04.001
Tessema K, Bedu H, Ejo M, and Hiko A (2017). Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of salmonella species isolated from chicken eggs by standard bacteriological method. Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology, 8(1): 1000421. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000421
United States department of agriculture, food safety and inspection services (USDA) (2011). Shell eggs from farm to table. Available at: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/safe-food-handling-and-preparation/eggs/shell-eggs-farm-table
Verraes C, Van Boxstael S, Van Meervenne E, Van Coillie E, Butaye P, Catry B, de Schaetzen MA, Van Huffel X, Imberechts H, Dierick K et al. (2013). Antimicrobial resistance in the food chain: A review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(7): 26432669. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10072643
Winter SE, Thiennimitr P, Winter MG, Butler BP, Huseby DL, Crawford RW, Russell JM, Bevins CL, Adams LG, Tsolis RM et al. (2010). Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for Salmonella. Nature, 467: 426-429. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1038/nature09415
World health organization (WHO) (2021). Antimicrobial resistance. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance
Zhao S, Blickenstaff K, Bodeis Jones S, Gaines SA, Tong E, and McDermott PF (2012). Comparison of the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolates from different retail meats in the Unites States, 2002 to 2008. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78(6): 17021707. DOI: https://www. doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07522-11
Ziyate N, Karraouan B, Kadiri A, Darkaoui S, Soulaymani A, and Bouchrif B (2016). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates in Moroccan laying hens farms. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 25(4): 539-546. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfw036
Zwe YH, Yen-Tang VC, Aung KT, Gutiérrez RA, Ng LC, and Yuk HG (2018). Prevalence, sequence types, antibiotic resistance and gyrA mutations of Salmonella isolated from retail fresh chicken meat in Singapore. Food Control, 90(3): 233-240. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1016/j .foodcont.2018.03.004
174
