CC BY
76
RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries
Вестник РУДН. Серия: АГРОНОМИЯ И ЖИВОТНОВОДСТВО
2018 Vol. 13 No. 3 185—193
http://journals.rudn.ru/agronomy
DOI: 10.22363/2312-797X-2018-13-3-185-193 УДК 631.674:635.1(470.45)
WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION REGIMES FOR VEGETABLE CROP PRODUCTION UNDER CONDITIONS OF VOLGA-DON INTERFLUVE
А.D. Akhmedov, Е.E. Dzhamaletdinova, А.Е. Zasimov
Volgograd State Agricultural University
Universitetskiy pr., 26, Volgograd, 400002, Russian Federation
Abstract. Irrigation regimes and rates of mineral fertilizers for obtaining the expected yields of vegetable crops under conditions of light chestnut soils of the Volga-Don interfluve are considered in the study. We established that irrigation regimes and norms of mineral fertilizers proposed in our field study for table beet (Beta vulgaris) and carrot (Daucus carota) cultivation allow yielding in the range of 60...80 t/ha. Thus, for example, the maximum yield of table beet 84.1 t/ha was obtained in the variant with 80% pre-irrigation soil moisture and N230P180K100 fertilizer at a variable depth of soil moistening (0.3...0.5 m). Changes in fertilizer dose from N130P80K.20 to N230P180K100 contributed to 63.7...84.1 t/ha yield increase, which is 10—20% higher compared to other variants. Change in soil moisture from 70—80—70 to 80—80—80% of FMC in combination with fertilizer dose from N150P70K180 to N210P100K260 increased carrot yields from an average of 57.9 to 81.6 t/ha. The highest yields (81.6 t/ha) were obtained when maintaining pre-irrigation soil moisture of 80—80—80% of FMC and applying N210P100K260 fertilizer rate. In general, beet and carrot cultivation on light chestnut soils using drip irrigation is the most efficient. To maintain water regimes of the soil adopted by the experiment, a different irrigation frequency was required. When increasing humidity level from 70 to 90% FMC frequency of irrigation increases, and irrigation rate decreases. The total consumption of moisture in the experiments increased with an increase in moisture content — from 4,417 m3/ha in the variant with 70% of FMC to 5105 m3/ha in the variant with 90% of FMC. The largest total water consumption of table beet was noted in the variant with a differentiated depth of soil wetting and averaged 4,530—5,105 m3/ha. The share of irrigation water in the total water consumption of plants increased from 73.3 to 75.7%. Application of mineral fertilizers reduces water consumption of table beet. The smallest coefficient was obtained in the second irrigation regime variant, when humidity was maintained at 80% of FMC with different wetting depth. This situation was observed in all variants of irrigation regimes and fertilizer applications. This confirms that differentiating wetting depth according to table beet growth stage makes it possible to use irrigation water more economically at all rates mineral fertilizer application.
Keywords: drip irrigation of vegetable crops, irrigation regime of vegetable crops, yield of vegetable crops, table beet and carrot water consumption, pre-irrigation soil moisture
INTRODUCTION
Currently, when growing vegetables, optimization of irrigation regime as a factor of integral significance has the first importance. It determines productivity per hectare and yield quality, total costs, water and energy resources demand, and public health situation. So, irrigation regime, irrigation technique, mechanization and automation should be improved, and new, more productive methods of irrigation should be created in order to increase efficiency of irrigation reclamation. Hence, experience of advanced
farms of the region and the data of research institutions show that proper farming practices and optimal irrigation regime result in high and stable yields of vegetable crops. It is well known, that irrigation water costs, soil properties and plant productivity change depending on the irrigation methods used. Therefore, drip irrigation is promising in vegetable crop growing [1—5, 6, 7].
Cultivation of vegetable crops, in particular carrots and beetroot, on irrigated lands of the Volgograd region is important. Hence, we are conducting research, which purpose is to determine optimal combination of irrigation regime and fertilizer application in order to obtain carrot and table beet yields at the level of 60, 70, 80 t/ha.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research was conducted during 2015—2017 on two plots of Gorodishchensky district of Volgograd region, located in the zone of unstable moistening according to the generally accepted recommendations of B.A. Dospekhov, V.N. Pleshakov, G.F. Nikitenko [8—10]. The soils are light chestnut heavy loam, slightly water-permeable. Humus content in 0—0.5 m soil layer is 1.87...2.02%, soil density is 1.31 t/m3, field moisture capacity (FMC) of dry soil is 22.93%. Soils of the experimental plots have 7.0...8.3 pH and are not saline.
The content of available forms of nitrogen in the first and second plots is characterized by low availability, mobile phosphorus has medium and high availability, exchangeable potassium has high and medium availability. Doses of mineral fertilizers were determined by a conventional method, according to V.I. Filin [11].
To obtain the expected yields of vegetable crops, there were two factors in the experiment: the first one is water regime of the soil (factor A), the second one — fertilizer dose (factor B).
In the first plot we studied optimal water and fertilizer regimes of the soil for cultivating table beet cultivar 'Bordo' from 2015 to 2017. A field two-factor experiment was conducted on the territory of individual entrepreneur 'Kolesnikov' in the Kuzmich village of Gorodishchensky district according to the following scheme:
1) irrigation regime — water regime of the soil was studied: irrigation was carried out along with humidity decrease to 70, 80 and 90% of FMC in active soil layer. 2 variants of soil wetting depth were planned: the first — 0.3 m during 'planting — root formation' and 0.5 m during 'root formation — technical ripeness' and the second — 0.5 m;
2) mineral fertilizers: rates of mineral fertilizers were calculated by the balance method for yields of 60, 70, 80 t/ha. In all variants according to the irrigation regime, they had the following rates: 1) N^afe 2)N180P13()K60; 3)
In the second plot investigations were carried out from 2015 to 2016 to study the effect of differentiated irrigation regimes and various fertilizer rates on carrot yields. The experiments were carried out on the territory of the Kuzmich village of "Kuzmi-chevsky' farm in Gorodishchensky district. The experiments were based on a two-factor scheme:
The first factor — irrigation regime: 70—80—70; 70—90—80; 80—80—80% of FMC (Table 1).
Table 1
Differentiation of pre-irrigation soil moisture depending on carrot growth stages
Irrigation regime variants Pre-irrigation soil moisture, % of FMC
Emergence — beginning of root formation Beginning of root formation — beginning of technical ripeness Beginning of technical ripeness — harvesting
1 70 80 70
2 70 90 80
3 80 80 80
The second factor — fertilizer application. The rates of mineral fertilizers were calculated by the balance method for yields of 60, 70, 80 t/ha. In all irrigation regime variants these rates were as following: 1-st — N150P60K180; 2-nd — N180P80K220; 3-rd — N210P100K260 (80 t/ga).
In both studies season irrigation was carried out using drip irrigation.
During carrot cultivation active soil layer was 0.5 m. The irrigation rates were 250...300 m3/ha, 208...300 m3/ha and 250 m3/ha. Carrots 'Mayor F1' hybrid seeds were sown using common regional agricultural techniques.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of three-year research on light chestnut soils of the Volga-Don interfluve have shown that the applied irrigation regimes and the application rates of mineral fertilizers along with drip irrigation make it possible to obtain expected yields of table beets and carrots at a level of 60...80 t/ha.
In our experiment, to maintain the water regimes of the soil a different number of irrigations were required. The data shown in Table 2 indicate that increase in humidity from 70 to 90% of FMC results in increase in number of irrigations and irrigation rates, and irrigation rate decreases.
Table 2
The irrigation regime of table beet on average for 2015—2017
Pre-irrigation soil moisture, % of FMC Watering rate, mVh^ Number of season irrigations Irrigation rate, m3^
At a depth of soil moistening 0.5 m
70 360 9 3 240
80 240 15 3 600
90 120 32 3 840
At a depth of soil moistening 0.3—0.5 m
70 220—360 7—5 3 340
80 148—240 11—9 3 788
90 75—120 21 — 19 3 855
Irrigation regime, crop yield and meteorological conditions of the growing season have a decisive influence on the amount of total water consumption. The total consumption of moisture in the experiments increased with an increase in water availability from 4,417 m3/ha in the variant with 70% of FMC to 5,105 m3/ha in the variant with 90% of FMC. The highest total water consumption of table beet was in the variant with a differentiated wetting depth and averaged 4,530...5,105 m3/ha. Share of irrigation water in total water consumption of plants increased from 73.3 to 75.7%, as water availability improved (Table 3).
Table 3
Total water consumption of table beet and its structure on average for 2015—2017
Pre-irrigation soil moisture, % of FMC Water source Total water consumption, m3/ha
watering precipitation soil
m3/ha % from Е m3/ha % of Е m3/ha % of Е
At 0.5 m wetting depth
70 3 240 73.3 1 045 23.7 132 3.0 4 417
80 3 600 74.6 1 045 21.6 185 3.8 4 830
90 3 840 75.7 1 045 20.6 190 3.7 5 075
At 0.3—0.5 m wetting depth
70 3 340 73.7 1 045 23.1 145 3.2 4 530
80 3 788 75.3 1 045 20.8 198 3.9 5 031
90 3 855 75.5 1 045 20.5 205 4.0 5 105
Table 4
Yield of table beet on average for 2015—2017
Factors Yield, t/ha
Fertilizer rate, kg of active ingredient per 1 ha Pre-irrigation soil moisture, % of FMC Wetting depth, m
N P K '*130 80 v90 70 0.5 49.7
N P K '*130 80 v90 70 0.3—0.5 54.9
N P K 80 0.5 59.7
N P K 80 0.3—0.5 63.7
N P K 90 0.5 56.4
N P K 90 0.3—0.5 58.9
N P K 70 0.5 59.4
N P K 70 0.3—0.5 62.3
N P K 80 0.5 67.3
N P K 80 0.3—0.5 78.3
N P K 90 0.5 62.7
N P K 90 0.3—0.5 65.4
N P K 70 0.5 69.3
N P K 70 0.3—0.5 72.0
N P K 80 0.5 76.3
N P K 930 180 100 80 0.3—0.5 84.1
N P K 930 180 100 90 0.5 74.1
N P K 930 180 100 90 0.3—0.5 78.2
Our experiments showed that different irrigation regimes and fertilizer applications had a significant impact on yield and water consumption of root crops. The maximum table beet yield of 84.1 t/ha was obtained when soil wetting depth was 0.3—0.5 m, soil moisture was 80% of FMC and N230P180K100 fertilizer rate (Table 4).
Depending on the variant, table beet yield increased by 8.8...11.5 t/ha after N180P130K60 application and by 25.6...29.2 t/ha after N230P180K100 application compared to N130P80K20 fertilizer application.
While maintaining wetting depth at the level of 0.3...0.5 m and increasing soil moisture level from 70 to 90% of FMC, table beet yield varied from 54.9 to 84.1 t/ha.
In all variants of the experiment, the highest table beet yield was obtained when pre-irrigation soil moisture was 80% of FMC and fertilization rate — N230P180K100. Decrease or increase of pre-irrigation soil moisture in active soil layer to 70 or 90% of FMC reduced yields of root crops by 10—15%.
According to the data obtained, mineral fertilizers also reduce beet water consumption. The lowest coefficient was in the second variant of irrigation regimes, when soil moisture was maintained at 80% of FMC with differentiated wetting depth. We observed it in all variants of irrigation regimes and fertilizer applications. This confirms that differentiation of wetting depth of the soil according to table beet growth stages makes it possible to use irrigation water more economically at all rates of mineral fertilizers (Table 5).
Table 5
Influence of irrigation regime and fertilizer application on water consumption of table beet on average for 2015—2017
Fertilizer rates, kg of active ingredient per 1 h^ Pre-irrigation soil moisture, % of FMC Yield, t/ha Water consumption, m3^ Total water consumption, mVh^
At 0.5 m wetting depth
N P K 70 49.7 88.87 4 417
N P K 80 59.7 80.90 4 830
N P K 90 56.4 89.98 5 075
N P K 70 59.4 74.36 4 417
N P K 80 67.3 71.77 4 830
N P K 90 62.7 80.94 5 075
N P K 70 69.3 63.74 4 417
N P K 80 76.3 63.30 4 830
N P K 90 74.1 68.49 5 075
At 0.3—0.5 m wetting depth
N P K 70 54.9 82.51 4 530
N P K 80 63.7 78.98 5 031
N P K 90 58.9 86.67 5 105
N P K 70 62.3 72.71 4 530
N P K 80 78.3 64.25 5 031
N P K 90 65.4 78.06 5 105
N P K 70 72.0 62.92 4 530
N P K 80 84.1 59.82 5 031
N P K 90 78.2 65.28 5 105
In the second plot, carrots were sown on May 15. During the research years, meteorological conditions had a great influence on irrigation frequency and rates. So, for example, depending on the variant, 15...20 waterings were conducted, which amounted to irrigation rate of 4,050...4,780 m3^ (Table 6).
According to the data of Table 7, differentiating pre-irrigation soil moisture and different fertilizer rates had a significant impact on carrot yield and water consumption. The data obtained show that changes in carrot productivity under drip irrigation correlate with changes in total water consumption and water consumption coefficient. In addition, carrots are very responsive to mineral fertilizer application. The maximum carrot yield of 81.6 t/ha can be obtained by maintaining constant soil moisture at the level of 80—80—80% of FMC and applying fertilizers at the following rate — N210P100K260.
Table 6
Carrot irrigation regime on average for 2015—2017
Var. Pre-irrigation soil moisture, % of FMC / Irrigation rate, m3/ha Number of waterings Irrigation rate, m3/ha
Emergence — beginning of root formation Beginning of root formation — beginning of technical ripeness Beginning of technical ripeness — harvesting
1 70 300 80 250 70 300 15 4 050
2 70 300 90 208 80 250 20 4 780
3 80 250 80 250 80 250 18 4 500
Table 7
Influence of irrigation regime and fertilizing on carrot yields and water consumption on average for 2015—2017
Yield (actual), t/ha Pre-irrigation soil moisture, % of FMC Mineral fertilizer rates for the expected yields Coefficient of water consumption, m3/ha Total water consumption, m3/ha
t/ha kg of active ingredient per 1 ha
57.9 70—80—70 60 N P K 98.07 5 678
62.8 70—90—80 70 N P K 92.05 5 781
71.5 80—80—80 80 N P K 82.38 5 890
66.3 70—80—70 60 N P K 85.64 5 678
72.0 70—90—80 70 N P K 80.29 5 781
73.6 80—80—80 80 N P K 80.03 5 890
68.2 70—80—70 60 N P K 83.26 5 678
72.7 70—90—80 70 N P K 79.52 5 781
81.6 80—80—80 80 N P K 72.18 5 890
The irrigation water was most effectively used at soil moisture levels of 80—80— 80% of FMC, since there was the lowest water consumption and averaged 72.18 m3/ha over research years.
Carrot yield 60 t/ha is achieved in the variant with pre-irrigation soil moisture of 70—80—70% of FMC in combination with fertilizer application N150P60K180. So, irrigation rate was 4,050 m3/ha, and total water consumption was 5,678 m3/ha.
For carrot yields of 70 t/ha irrigation rate increased to 4,780 m3/ha, and total water consumption increased to 5,781 m3/ha. The maximum carrot yield 81.6 t/ha was obtained when soil moisture was 80—80—80% of FMC and fertilizer rate was increased to N210P100K260.
Thus, our studies have shown that table beets and carrots are very responsive to the optimal combination of irrigation and fertilizer parameters. In general, application of mineral fertilizers has a significant effect on productivity and water consumption coefficient of the root crops in all irrigation regime variants.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data obtained, the following conclusions can be drawn.
When cultivating table beet under conditions of the Volga-Don interfluve, the optimal variant is a differentiated variant, with a variable wetting depth of soil (0.3...0.5 m).
The maximum table beet yield in this variant was obtained in the plot with soil moisture of 80% of FMC, and, depending on the variant, it was 63.7...84.1 t ha, which is 10...20% higher in comparison with other variants.
The greatest carrot yield (81.6 t/ha) was achieved in the variant with pre-irrigated soil moisture 80—80—80% of FMC combined with mineral fertilizer application N210P100K260.
© A.D. Akhmedov, E.E. Dzhamaletdinova, A.E. Zasimov, 2018. REFERENCES
[1] Akhmedov AD, Temerev AA, Galiullina EY. Ecological aspects of drip irrigation. Problemy i perspektivy innovatsionnog orazvitiya mirovogo sel'skogo khozyaistva: materialy mezhduna-rodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii Saratovskogo GAU. Saratov; 2010. P. 156—158. (In Russ).
[2] Akhmedov AD, Zasimov AE. Irrigation regime of beets in conditions of the Volga-Don interfluve. Strategicheskie orientiry innovatsionnogo razvitiya APK v sovremennykh usloviyakh: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Volgograd: FGBOU VO Volgogradskii GAU Publ.; 2016;3. p. 106—110. (In Russ).
[3] Borodychev VV, Martynova AA. Irrigation regime and mineral nutrition of carrots. Melioratsiya i vodnoe khozyaistvo. 2011;(1):39—41. (In Russ).
[4] Borodychev VV, Martynova AA. Management of potential carrot productivity. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie. 2011;21(1):17—23. (In Russ).
[5] Dospekhov BA. Planirovanie polevogo opyta i statisticheskaya obrabotka ego dannykh [Planning of field experiment and statistical processing of its data]. Moscow: Kolos Publ.; 1972. 207 p. (In Russ).
[6] Filin VI. Spravochnaya kniga po rastenievodstvu s osnovami pro-grammirovaniya urozhaya [A reference book on plant growing with basics of harvest programming]. Volgograd: VGSKhA Publ.; 1994. 274 p. (In Russ)
[7] Pleshakov VN. Metodika polevogo opyta v usloviyakh orosheniya [Methodology of field experiment under irrigation]. Volgograd: VNIIOZ Publ.; 1983. 148 p. (In Russ).
[8] Dubenok HH, Borodychev VV, Martynova AA. Mineral nutrition is an important resource for increasing carrot productivity under drip irrigation. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2010;(7):24—27. (In Russ). House "Education and Science" s.r.o.; 2014. p. 28—31. (In Russ).
[9] Khodyakov EA, Osinkin VV, Kovalenko IA. Optimization of irrigation regime for growing table beet and zucchini under drip irrigation in the Lower Volga region. Aplikovane vedecke novinky—2014. Materialy X mezinarodni vedecko-prakticka conference. Dil. 16 Zemdelstvi. zverolekarstvi. Praha: Publishing.
[10] Kuznetsova NV, Stepanova NE. Photosynthetic activity of table beet crops on irrigated light chestnut lands of the Lower Volga Region. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie. 2011;(1):36—42. (In Russ).
[11] Nikitenko GF, editor. Opytnoe delo v polevodstve [Experimentation activity in field husbandry]. Moscow: Rossel'khozizdat Publ.; 1982. 190 p. (In Russ).
Author's personal data:
Askar Jangir oglu Ahmedov — professor, Doctor of Engineering Science, Volgograd State Agricultural University; e-mail: [email protected]
Djamaletdinova Elena Eurikovna — PhD. student, Volgograd State Agricultural University; e-mail: [email protected]
Anton Evgenievich Zasimov — Ph.D. student, Volgograd State Agricultural University; e-mail: zasimov.anton@gmail. com
For citation:
Akhmedov AD, Dzhamaletdinova EE, Zasimov AE. Water-saving irrigation regimes for vegetable crop production under conditions of Volga-Don interfluve. RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries, 2018, 13 (3), 185—193. doi: 10.22363/2312-797X-2018-13-3-185-193.
DOI: 10.22363/2312-797Х-2018-13-3-185-193
ВОДОСБЕРЕГАЮЩИЕ РЕЖИМЫ ОРОШЕНИЯ ОВОЩНЫХ КУЛЬТУР В УСЛОВИЯХ ВОЛГО-ДОНСКОГО МЕЖДУРЕЧЬЯ
А.Д. Ахмедов, Е.Э. Джамалетдинова, А.Е. Засимов
ФГБОУ ВО Волгоградский государственный аграрный университет пр. Университетский, 26, Волгоград, 400002, Российская Федерация
Рассмотрены режимы орошения и нормы внесения минеральных удобрений для получения запланированной урожайности овощных культур в условиях светло-каштановых почв Волго-Донского междуречья. Установлено, что предлагаемые в нашем полевом исследовании режимы орошения и нормы минеральных удобрений при выращивании столовой свеклы и моркови позволяют получать урожайность в пределах 60...80 т/га. Так, например, максимальная урожайность столовой свеклы 84,1 т/га получена на варианте с влажностью 80% НВ в сочетании с внесением удобрений нормой К^Р^оК^о при переменной глубины увлажнения почвы (0,3...0,5 м). Изменение дозы удобрений от К"130Р80К20, до К^Р^оК^о способствовало повышению урожая в пределах 63,7— 84,1 т/га, что на 10...20% выше по сравнению с другими вариантами опыта. При возделывании моркови изменение влажности почвы от 70—80—70 до 80—80—80% НВ в сочетании с внесением дозы удобрений от К150Р70К180 до К210Р100К260 способствовало повышению урожайности корнеплодов в среднем с 57,9 до 81,6 т/га. Наиболее высокие показатели урожайности 81,6 т/га получены при поддержании предполивного порога влажности 80—80—80% НВ при норме минерального питания К210Р100К260. В целом, на светло-каштановых почвах выращивание столовой свеклы и моркови с применением капельного полива и внесения удобрений является наиболее эффективным.
Ключевые слова: капельное орошение овощных культур, режим орошения овощных культур, свекла столовая, морковь, урожайность овощных культур, удобрение овощных культур, коэффициент водопотребления столовой свеклы и моркови, суммарное водопотребление столовой свеклы и моркови, предполивная влажность почвы
БИБЛИОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ СПИСОК
[1] Ахмедов А.Д. Экологические аспекты капельного орошения [Текст] / А.Д. Ахмедов, А.А. Темерев, Е.Ю. Галиуллина // Проблемы и перспективы инновационного развития мирового сельского хозяйства: материалы междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Саратовского ГАУ. Саратов, 2010. С. 156—158.
[2] Ахмедов А.Д. Поливной режим свеклы в условиях Волго-Донского междуречья [Текст] / А.Д. Ахмедов, А.Е. Засимов // Стратегические ориентиры инновационного развития АПК в современных условиях: материалы междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Т. 3. Волгоград: ФГБОУ ВО Волгоградский ГАУ, 2016. С.106—110.
[3] Бородычев В.В. Режим орошения и минеральное питание моркови [Текст] / В.В. Бороды-чев, A.A. Мартынова // Мелиорация и водное хозяйство. 2011. № 1. С. 39—41.
[4] Бородычев В.В. Управление реализацией потенциальной продуктивности моркови [Текст] / В.В. Бородычев, A.A. Мартынова // Известия Нижневолжского агроуниверситетского комплекса: наука и высшее профессиональное образование. 2011. № 1 (21). С. 17—23.
[5] Дубенок H.H. Минеральное питание — важный ресурс повышения продуктивности моркови при капельном орошении [Текст] / H.H. Дубенок, В.В. Бородычев, A.A. Мартынова // Достижения науки и техники АПК. 2010. № 7. С. 24—26.
[6] Филин В.И. Справочная книга по растениеводству с основами программирования урожая [Текст] / В.И. Филин. ВГСХА. Волгоград, 1994. 274 с.
[7] Плешаков В.Н. Методика полевого опыта в условиях орошения [Текст] / В.Н. Плешаков. Волгоград: ВНИИОЗ, 1983. 148 с.
[8] Доспехов Б.А. Планирование полевого опыта и статистическая обработка его данных [Текст] / Б.А. Доспехов. М.: Колос, 1972. 207 с.
[9] Ходяков Е.А. Оптимизация режима орошения для выращивания столовой свеклы и кабачков при капельном поливе в Нижнем Поволжье [Текст] / Е.А. Ходяков, В.В. Осинкин, И.А. Коваленко // Aplikovanevedeckenovinky-2014. Materialy X mezinarodni vedecko-prakticka conference. Dil. 16 Zemdelstvi. zverolekarstvi. Praha: PublishingHouse "Education and Science" s.r.o, 2014. p. 28—31.
[10] Кузнецова Н.В. Фотосинтетическая деятельность посевов столовой свеклы на орошаемых светло-каштановых землях Нижнего Поволжья [Текст] / Н.В. Кузнецова, Н.Е. Степанова // Известия Нижневолжского агроуниверситетского комплекса: наука и высшее профессиональное образование. 2011. № 1. С. 36—42.
[11] Никитенко Г.Ф. и др. Опытное дело в полеводстве [Текст] / Г.Ф. Никитенко. М.: Рос-сельхозиздат, 1982.
Для цитирования:
Ахмедов А.Д., Джамалетдинова Е.Э., Засимов А.Е. Водосберегающие режимы орошения овощных культур в условиях Волго-донского междуречья // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Агрономия и животноводство. 2018. Т. 13. № 3. С. 185—193. doi: 10.22363/2312-797X-2018-13-3-185-193.
