VALUES IN FOUNDATION OF MODERN GLOBALIZING SOCIETY: CHANGE STUDY

Ashilova Madina Serikbekovna; Begalinov Alibek Serikbekovich; Pushkarev Yury Viktorovich; Begalinova Kalimash Kapsamarovna; Pushkareva Elena Aleksandrovna

Science for Education Today

2023, vol. 13, issue 2_ http://en.sciforedu.ru/

ISSN 2658-6762

DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2302.05

Research Full Article/ Article language: English

Values in foundation of modern globalizing society:

Change study

Madina S. Ashilova1, Alibek S. Begalinov2, Yury V. Pushkarev3, Kalimash K. Begalinova4, Elena A. Pushkareva3

1Abylai Khan Kazakh University of International Relations and World Languages,

Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan international University of Information Technologies, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan ■Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation 4Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan

Abstract

Introduction. The modern era is experiencing a prolonged pandemic, migration issues, conflicts, and other global catastrophes. Many researchers see the cause of these problems in the crisis of traditional values, which is becoming increasingly apparent today. Values and value orientations are an integral part of human life and culture. They determine life goals, as well as ways and means of achieving them. Global catastrophes and continuous social changes lead to the transformation of the value system, which is reflected in scholarly literature, as researchers primarily react to particularly acute and relevant problems of modern times.

The main goal of this study is to reveal values which constitute the foundations of modern globalizing society and to describe their recent transformations.

Materials and Methods. In this regard, an analysis of scholarly literature devoted to the issues of values was conducted. The universal classification of values proposed by S. Schwartz was used as the basis for the analysis. The main methodology was content analysis of scholarly literature for the prevalence and occurrence of the main types of values in scientific works in the Web of Science database from 2017 to 2022.

Acknowledgments

This article was written within the framework of the research project AP09058341 "Transformation of the values of Kazakhstani system of higher education in the conditions of a multicultural and globalizing world", implemented by the research group of Abylai Khan KazUIR & WL with the support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2021-2023.

For citation

Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S., Pushkarev Yu. V., Begalinova K. K., Pushkareva E. A. Values in foundation of modern globalizing society: Change study. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13 (2), pp. 99-121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2302.05

E3 Corresponding Author: Madina S. Ashilova, maLliiia.almatytv ajvail.ru

99

© ®

2023, vol. 13, issue 2_ http://en.sciforedu.ru/

ISSN 2658-6762

Results. Research findings include the following: 1) the prevalence and use of all types of values has been increasing for the period; 2) the dominance of individualistic egoistic values over public collective values; 3) the most common categories of values are: independence, health, success, responsibility, and capability. The least common values are: open-mindedness, common preferences, self-indulgence, respect for elders, mature love, and true friendship; 4) in recent years despite social upheavals, the main values of society have not changed.

Thus, it can be concluded that spiritual values do not generate as much scientific interest as material values. Although the pandemic was able to make people reflect on the moral foundations of their life, it did not significantly affect the re-evaluation of modern values. However, the researchers emphasize that within a decaying culture, some precursors of the emerging (post-technocratic) culture are developing. According to them, the new worldview will be built on overcoming anthropocentric attitudes.

Conclusions. This study will complement the understanding of the transformation of modern values under the influence of the pandemic, globalization, crises, and other factors. Its results will be useful to educators in higher education institutions, education philosophers, and anyone interested in higher education problems.

Philosophy of education; Pandemic; Educational values; Axiology; Educational goals; Educational transformation; Crisis of values.

Keywords

Modern society, which is experiencing a crisis of pandemics, migrations, prolonged conflicts, and other global cataclysms [1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6], is defined in scientific research literature as a post-nonclassical, post-industrial, postmodern, informational, and globalized era [7; 8]. This society is characterized by an unprecedented pace of change, a significant increase in the role of information and media, broad involvement of masses in civil society, interactions and conflicts between different cultures and peoples1 [8; 9; 10].

Introduction

In recent years, modern society has seriously faced the problem of the degradation of basic human values: "the crisis of values is defined as the greatest curse of globalization, led by a free market; this trend has exacerbated global inequality, contributed to terrorism and violence, spawned psychological anomie, and provoked ecological catastrophes" [12].

Scientists believe that what is happening in the world is rather a consequence than a cause of this situation [13; 14; 15]. Values and value orientations are an integral part of human life and culture. They determine life goals, as well as ways and means to achieve them.

Global cataclysms and continuous social changes entail the transformation of the value system, which is reflected in scientific research literature [16; 17; 18; 19; 20], since scientists, first

1 Ashilova M. S., Nalivaiko N. V. Philosophy of education of the east and west: the development of the dialogue. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical

University Publ., 2013, 300 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29673742

© ®

100

and foremost, react to particularly acute and relevant problems of modernity.

To understand the values underlying modern globalizing society and their transformations in recent years, scientific literature on the subject of values will be analyzed.

Methods

The universal classification of values proposed by S. Schwartz [21], which identifies 10 basic types of values based on universal human needs (biological needs, the need for coordinated social interaction, and the requirements of group life), will be used. According to Schwartz, these groups of values determine the direction of both individual actions and overall life activities, and each type of value has its own motivational goal.

Table 1

Classification of values by S. Schwartz

№ Name of value Motivational Goal

1 Self-Direction Freedom of thought and action (choice, creativity, knowledge) driven by the individual's need to be autonomous and independent.

2 Stumulation Novelty and competitiveness in life, necessary to maintain the optimal level of organism activity.

3 Hedonism Pleasure, sensual enjoyment, and enjoyment of life. It is based on the need for satisfying biological needs and the pleasure experienced in doing so.

4 Achievement Personal achievement within shared cultural standards, leading to social approval.

5 Power Achievement of social status, prestige, and influence over other people. It is based on the need for dominance, control, and leadership.

6 Security Stability, security, and harmony of society, family, and the individual. It is based on the need for an adapted and predictable world, reducing uncertainty.

7 Conformity Restriction of actions and motivations that cause harm to others or disrupt social harmony. It is derived from the group's need for self-preservation and survival and the individual's need to interact harmoniously with others, suppressing socially destructive tendencies.

8 Tradition Respect and support for customs, acceptance and recognition of ideas existing in a particular culture and religion. Traditional behavior becomes a symbol of group solidarity, an expression of its unique worldview.

9 Benevolence Supporting and enhancing the well-being of the people with whom the individual is in contact. It is based on the need for positive interaction for the group's well-being and the individual's need for affiliation.

10 Universalism Understanding, gratitude, tolerance, and maintaining the well-being of all people and nature. This motivational type was not derived a priori from the three specified universal human needs, but was discovered empirically through research on values. This goal is apparently based on universal needs for beauty, harmony, and justice.

101

© ®

Based on the classification of values by S. Schwartz [21], a content analysis of scientific literature was conducted to determine the usage and occurrence of these types of values in research papers.

Scientific articles from the Web of Science database from all publications for the period from 2017 to 2022 were used for the analysis.

Each of the 10 categories and their derivatives - a series of terms that reveal these categories (Figure 1)2 - were analyzed.

Figure 1. Categories of values according to S. Schwartz.

The number of keywords was 55. The search by titles covered about 2.5 million publications. Three keywords were excluded from the analysis due to ambiguity or non-occurrence (helpful, moderate, accepting my portion in life).

2 Potts D. The Schwartz theory of basic values and some implications for political philosophy. Policy of Truth. URL:

Results

Results of the study:

See Table 2. Usage of categories in scientific literature.

https ://irfankhawajaphilosopher. com/2015/08/12/the-

schwartz-theory-of-basic-values-and-some-

implications-for-political-philosophy/

102

Science for Education Today

2023, vol. 13, issue 2_ http://en.sciforedu.ru/ ISSN 2658-6762

Table 2

Usage of categories in scientific literature

Category Values 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 total

Universalism broadminded 2 1 2 1 2 8

equality 4394 4855 5557 5758 5914 1980 28458

inity with nature 194 212 199 228 266 48 1147

protecting the environment 3532 3820 4460 5017 5457 1962 2 24250

inner harmony 30 28 23 29 27 6 143

a world of beauty 208 193 220 207 189 45 1062

a world at peace 171 194 192 174 154 33 918

social justice 3420 3937 4760 5437 5665 2002 25221

wisdom 1977 2015 2046 2108 2117 701 10964

92171

Benevolence mature love 19 20 18 19 19 5 100

a spiritual life 1220 1330 1338 1495 1573 462 7418

forgiving 147 173 202 175 198 66 961

true friendship 18 33 29 40 35 8 163

meaning in life 18533 19677 22453 24324 25316 8391 1 118695

responsible 34027 35548 38249 40772 42941 13739 205276

loyal 351 369 377 398 433 111 2039

honest 788 870 896 961 993 287 4795

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

339447

Conformity self-discipline 102 86 121 123 129 40 601

politeness 251 304 348 272 306 86 1567

honouring of elders 6 12 8 10 11 6 53

obedient 54 59 50 48 63 21 295

2516

Tradition humble 197 232 246 256 302 103 1336

detachment 3502 3630 3978 4280 4496 1491 21377

devout 40 47 58 38 47 9 239

respect for tradition 214 234 267 235 234 59 1243

24195

Security healthy 56874 59417 65911 72216 77880 25644 2 357944

family security 928 1041 1136 1275 1456 499 6335

social order 11986 12302 13616 14386 13933 4018 70241

clean 14344 15474 17776 19556 22194 7632 5 96981

103

© ®

Science for Education Today

2023, vol. 13, issue 2_

http://en.sciforedu.ru/

ISSN 2658-6762

sense of belonging 1159 1346 1599 1787 1933 633 8457

reciprocation of favours 2 3 3 2 10

national security 2534 2689 3095 3194 3342 1073 15927

555895

Power social recognition 3115 3404 3982 4176 4311 1442 20430

wealth 4657 4871 5484 6026 6364 2065 29467

authority 12635 13795 15137 16730 17340 5201 3 80841

preserving my public image 87 95 123 130 174 59 668

social power 6778 7427 8752 9179 9328 3111 44575

175981

Achievement intelligent 11834 13449 15603 16925 19249 7541 3 84604

capable 29432 31025 33552 34009 34983 10928 6 173935

successful 42158 44216 48282 50824 53989 17006 4 256479

ambitious 1237 1292 1441 1568 1609 505 7652

influential 5982 6800 7628 8247 9198 4308 2 42165

564835

Hedonism engoying life 503 489 522 541 540 191 2786

pleasure 1435 1579 1756 1745 1785 600 8900

self-indulgent 5 4 10 6 5 5 35

11721

Simulation daring 369 349 374 407 345 104 1948

a varied life 5950 6369 7302 7800 8629 2967 39017

an exciting life 194 186 227 216 251 60 1134

42099

Self-direction freedom 14682 15195 16356 16581 16874 5407 1 85096

independent 77945 80083 87167 92257 99347 32619 3 469421

curious 695 738 864 928 838 248 4311

creativity 4349 4481 5050 4944 4876 1514 25214

choosing own goals 1722 1942 1997 2025 2091 660 10437

privacy 7794 8782 10220 11103 12007 4063 6 53975

self-respect 49 52 55 70 63 16 305

total 394831 416771 461117 491259 521823 171780 38 648759

TOTAL 2457619

104

© ®

Let's consider the main points of the conducted analysis.

1) The occurrence and usage of all types of values have been increasing every year. For

example, if in 2017 the total number of terms found in the database was about 395,000, then in 2021 it was 521,800. The trend has been steadily increasing over the entire period, indicating the continuous growth of researchers' interest in axiology and different types of values.

This is supported by the results of other studies. Ping Ping Fu, for example, notes that since the development of M. Rokeach's "values orientation" methodology in 1973, thousands of articles have been published on the topic of individual values [22].

M. Rokeach first proposed the concept and scale of values, emphasizing their predominant role in individual attitudes and behavior. Later, Schwartz and Bilsky (1987) defined values as "concepts or beliefs about desired end states or behaviors that go beyond specific situations, guide choice or evaluation of behavior and events, and are ordered by relative importance" [23].

S. Schwartz (1992) developed an empirical tool called the "Schwartz's Value Survey" (SVS), which allowed researchers to identify values and their role in individual attitudes and behavior [21] (e. g., Bardi & Schwartz, 2003 [24]; Prentice, 1987 [25]), as well as their organizational effectiveness (e. g., Berson, Oreg, & Dvir, 2008 [26]; Zu & Song, 2009 [27]) in different cultures. Soon, research on personal values became widespread.

Interestingly, despite this, there has been no meta-analysis of personal values. Several major reviews have appeared in the fields of sociology and cross-cultural psychology. In 2000, Rohan drew attention to the redundancy of different variations of values and proposed a mechanism by which value priorities influence attitudinal and

behavioral decisions [28]. Hitlin and Piliavin (2004) outlined the contours of value orientations to link values to culture, social structure, and individual behavior [29]. Kirkman, Lowe, and Gibson (2006) conducted a qualitative review of nearly 200 empirical studies using Hofstede's parameters published in 40 journals and book series from 1980 to 2002 [30]. Roccas and Sagiv (2010) [31] and Boer and Fischer (2013) [32] investigated the relationship between personal values and attitudes/behavior of people in different cultures.

As we can see, today, in the face of global turbulence and instability, issues of values are becoming increasingly relevant.

Modern scientists have identified several contours of value consciousness: biological (objectively naturalistic concept), social (dialectical-materialistic concept), individual (subjective-psychological concepts), and existential (objectively transcendent and ontological idealistic-realistic concepts). In the future perspective of the development of the science of values, a number of authors consider it necessary to develop a synthetic concept of axiology, which would allow for predicting the development of the cultural-value core as an imperative of sociocultural processes [33].

2) The study shows the dominance of individualistic egoistic values over social collective ones. Values that express the interests of the individual (power, achievement, hedonism, stimulation, independence) occur almost four times more frequently than values that express group interests (benevolence, tradition, comfort).

Some researchers believe that this is associated with the phenomenon of globalization, "based on egoistic axiology, the priority of which is the uncompromising pursuit of maximum profit" [34].

105

© ®

Science for Education Today

2023, vol. 13, issue 2_

http://en.sciforedu.ru/

ISSN 2658-6762

In turn, maximum profit is a consequence of the widespread adoption in the globalized world of a neoliberal agenda, based "on the rejection of social objectivism and social reason in favor of individual preferences and subjective values"

[35]. Scientists consider the reforms carried out within this program as destroying the practice of solidarity. And despite the crises of recent years, an alternative agenda has not yet emerged.

Furthermore, some researchers believe that globalization generating more and more challenges for humanity, "from technological, economic, and political challenges to socio-cultural challenges. Because of this phenomenon we find ourselves in a value crisis which invites us to create new values that apply to our times"

[36].

Scientists consider the crisis of values to be the primary cause of the decline of European integration. "The expansion of bureaucratic structures has devalued the system of basic values. In its place has come the practice of the functioning of the European institution based on the principles of bureaucratic efficiency and legalism, which has led to an increase in legal norms and an excessive amount of documents. Solidarity became a slogan and ceased to be a moral imperative. The European common good was exchanged for a sum of national selfishness"1.

Scientists pinned great hopes for the debunking of the neoliberal economy on the COVID-19 pandemic, believing that "the collective experience of food insecurity caused by the pandemic will expose the fallacy of the basic moral economic values underlying the value chains of industrial capitalism" [37].

However, as we will see later, this did not happen.

1 Modrzejewski A. The European Union and crisis of values. Governing for the Future: Interdisciplinary Perspectives for a Sustainable World. International Political Sci-

3) The most common categories of values are independent, healthy, successful, responsible, and capable. The least common are broadminded, reciprocation of favors, self-indulgent, honoring elders, mature love, and true friendship. Thus, spiritual values are not of as much scientific interest as material values.

Categories like mature love only appeared in 100 publications, inner harmony in 143, true friendship in 163, unity with nature in 1,000, while values directed towards material success and power appear thousands of times more often: successful in 256,000 publications, authority in 80,000, wealth in 29,000.

We consider this situation not accidental and fitting into the overall logic of the crisis phenomenon of modern culture. Scientists note that "historically developed forms of basic values (rationalism, humanism, individualism, liberalism, instrumentalism) are based on an outdated worldview, on the 'presumption of the infinity of resources available to civilization and the infinite activity of industrial progress" [38]. Many of the problems of the modern world are directly related to the growth of technological progress and consumer attitudes towards nature.

Scientists believe that the root cause of the current situation is a paradigm of human thinking, which today involves infinite consumption, simulation, and the substitution of concepts. Modern advertising offers the use of "a unique phenomenon called quasi-value, built on giving non-material value to material objects" [39]. Spiritual things are portrayed as material, insignificant things as significant. "The mass media and advertising sector usually promote materialistic beliefs through stories and images that link money and consumption with happiness,

ence Conference on Governing for the Future - Interdisciplinary Perspectives for a Sustainable World, Bucharest, Romania, 2016, pp. 167-172.

106

© ®

high self-esteem, and public recognition" 2 . Concept substitution is especially evident in crisis moments, such as the pandemic. "The tendency towards materialistic behavior - a focus on acquiring money and possessions that indicate economic and social status - is caused by high levels of stress, anxiety, and loneliness. For many, the pandemic has been a stressful, anxious, and lonely period"3.

Various factors can be the source of the crisis in the spiritual sphere of society in the context of global instability and cultural-civilizational shifts: "the loss of a public ideal, divergence of the value-normative foundations of society, the disintegration of society, the escalation of the values of consumerism and mass culture" 4

The dominant agenda - economic growth with its materialistic and selfish attitude towards the world, encouraged by globalization and the pursuit of material well-being - is collapsing in the crisis. Globalization has become "a process of de-identification of society, with simultaneous individualization and atomization of the individual" [40]. However, the modern society of atomic individuals, thanks to global unification and standardization, is essentially disintegrated, fragmented, and oriented towards dehumanization, which testifies to a "profound, fundamental crisis of the ontological-existential foundations of human 'being-in-the-world'"5.

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

In connection with this, some scientists believe that "perhaps in the Western world, it is necessary to stimulate a shift in focus from

materialistic considerations to spiritual values"

[41].

4) Despite the social upheavals of recent years, the basic values of society have not changed. Neither global warming, nor the pandemic, nor prolonged military conflicts in various parts of the world have seriously influenced the views of scientists on the transformation of societal value orientations. The main "agenda" remains the same as it was 5 years ago: independence, security, and achievement.

"Nourishing illusions that humanity, thanks to the pandemic, will deviate from the path established as the conquest of rationalism, is practically impossible. And yet it is necessary to balance rationality and sensitivity, intuition. This will be the answer to the challenge of history"

[42].

Many studies by scientists in recent years have been devoted to the transformation of individual values under the influence of the pandemic. However, most research concerns the micro-level: psychological and medical changes in people's lives. It is noted that "while all higher order values were stable prior to the pandemic, conservation values, emphasizing order and stability, became more important during the pandemic. In contrast, openness to change values, emphasizing self-direction and stimulation, showed a decrease during the pandemic, which was reversed in late 2020" [43]. People have changed due to the pandemic. But these changes have not yet led to a change in society. As for the

2 Andres O. M. COVID may have made us less materialistic - new research. The Conversation, 2022. URL: https://theconversation.com/covid-may-have-made-us-less-materialistic-new-research-175890

3 There too.

4 Kolyadko I. N. Spiritual crisis in the dynamics of socio-

cultural development of modern societies: concept and

phenomenon. Prospects of the Belarusian-Chinese dialogue in conditions of global instability: collection of scientific articles and materials of the XV International Interdisciplinary scientific and Theoretical Seminar "Innovative strategies in modern social philosophy", December 7-8, 2021, Minsk, Republic of Belarus. Minsk: BSU, 2021. pp. 290-293.

5 There too, pp. 290-293.

107

© ®

macro-level, the functioning of society and the state after the pandemic, here the majority of works continue to follow the line of neoliberalism. According to their opinion, the panacea is an even more extensive global market, a strong economy, international trade, technological progress, and an increase in globalization [44].

The worldwide response to the COVID-19 pandemic is accelerating the shift toward the de-globalization of capital, but it will also speed up the move to a stronger globalization of labor. This paradoxical, simultaneous occurrence of de-globalization and globalization offers rich opportunities for future IB research [45].

According to some researchers, the risks of the pandemic will be mitigated by "by multinational enterprises through alternate cross-border business strategies and emerging technologies", for which they will need even greater globalization [46].

The crisis caused by the emergence of a new pandemic, which can be defined as a borderline situation not only for a specific person but for humanity as a whole, is an existential crisis because it affects the meaning of human existence. The ways out must "inevitably presuppose a renewed way of being, a reassessment of values as an absolute necessity, as a response to the challenge presented to humanity" [42].

However, as we can see, the worldview of society and the overall agenda have not changed fundamentally. Despite the fact that it is precisely the individual and their mindless and consumerist culture that led to the pandemic and other modern global crises, there is still an excessive reliance on globalization. "Globalization has given way to recent frustrations and concerns which cannot be quietened by reminding the benefits it brought" [47].

The 2001 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Kofi Annan once said that "to argue against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity". Scientists note that only collective actions by countries can confront global challenges such as climate change, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and cyber-attacks. However, it should be noted that it is precisely globalization, in its understanding as the global spread of the capitalist economic system with an ideology called neoliberalism [48], that is responsible for the emergence of these global challenges.

Can the cause of the crisis itself lead to its resolution? Will it not lead to even greater conflict and crisis ahead?

It seems that the answer is obvious. However, most scientists still adhere to the established line, unwilling to change the basic paradigm underlying it. They think about how the market will survive the pandemic, how the digital industry will develop after it, how to restore the pre-pandemic state of stability and comfort to the world, how to strengthen globalization and make the global labor market even more diversified. But all of this, without a profound transformation of consciousness and attitude towards the world, is superficial and will not yield results. In this regard, scientists are right to insist on a reassessment of the values that underlie the harmful globalized neoliberal culture.

"A collective human consciousness shake has occurred, but the task at present is to follow it with a change in the essence of values. It is difficult to say how possible this is in a world of technological determinism, but without it, catastrophes will pursue humanity at an even more intense pace" [42].

108

© ®

Conclusions. Discussion

The modern era is experiencing a protracted pandemic, migration problems, conflicts, and other global cataclysms. Many researchers see the reason for this in the crisis of traditional values, which is becoming increasingly apparent today. That life has value is a tenet eliciting all but universal agreement, be it amongst philosophers, policy-makers, or the general public. Yet, when it comes to its employment in practice, especially in the context of policies which require the balancing of different moral choices-for example in health care, foreign aid, or animal rights related decisions-it takes little for cracks to appear and for disagreement to arise as to what the value of life actually means and how it should guide our actions in the real world [49].

The main goal of this study was to determine which values underlie modern globalizing society and how they have been transformed in recent years. Using the universal classification of values proposed by S. Schwartz as a basis, scientific articles from the Web of Science database for the period from 2017 to 2022 were analyzed.

The main results of the study include: 1) the frequency and use of all types of values are increasing from year to year, 2) the study shows the dominance of individual selfish values over public collective values, 3) the most common categories of values are independent, healthy, successful, responsible, capable. The least common are broadminded, reciprocation of favors, self-indulgent, honoring elders, mature love, true friendship, 4) despite the social cataclysms of recent years, the main values of society have not changed.

Thus, it can be concluded that spiritual values do not generate as much scientific interest as material ones. While the pandemic was able to make people reflect on the moral foundations of life, it did not significantly influence a

reassessment of modern values. The degradation of traditional values continues. "Morals and values that are highly valued are now being eroded along with the progressive trend of modern civilization. This decline has taken a dangerous turn" [50].

However, researchers emphasize that within a disintegrating culture, there are some embryos, prototypes of another (post-technocratic) period of cultural development. According to them, the new worldview will be built on overcoming anthropocentric attitudes. "At the center of the humanistic worldview should be not a person by himself, but the existence of a person in the world. Changes in the core of New European cultural values are reflected in philosophical reflection on them, which serves as the subject of further analysis" [38].

In the perspective of the future development of being, such methods and forms of it will become relevant, which will offer not only technological progress, but also real changes in people's lives aimed at feelings, those "who can and will be sensitive to everything that is happening in the world and not only react but also feel the pulse of change" will triumph [42].

This study will complement the understanding of the transformation of modern values under the influence of the pandemic, globalization, cataclysms, and other factors. Its results will be useful for educators in higher education institutions, educational philosophers, and all those interested in higher education issues.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the researchers of KazUIR&WL named after Abylai khan for their assistance in conducting the research and translating it into English: N. S. Kassymbayeva, V. A. Rakhimzhanova, M. M. Usserbayeva, and Ye. S. Kim.

109

© ®

REFERENCES

1. Gibbs P. Transdisciplinary possibilities after the pandemic. Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2020, vol. 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655

2. O'Dea X., Stern J. Virtually the same?: Online higher education in the post Covid-19 era. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 437-442. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13211 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13211

3. Phungsoonthorn T., Charoensukmongkol P. How does mindfulness help university employees cope with emotional exhaustion during the COVID-19 crisis? The mediating role of psychological hardiness and the moderating effect of workload. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12826 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjop. 12826

4. Tkacová H., Pavlikova M., Jenisová Z., Maturkanic P., Kralik R. Social media and students' wellbeing: An empirical analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13 (18), pp. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810442

5. Yang L.-P., Xin T. Changing educational assessments in the post-COVID-19 Era: From assessment of learning (AoL) to assessment as learning (AaL). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2022, vol. 41 (1), pp. 54-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12492 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip. 12492

6. Zhang L., Allen Carter R., Qian X., Yang S., Rujimora J., Wen S. Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2022, vol. 53 (3), pp. 620-646. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13191

URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13191

7. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Philosophical interpretation of knowledge and information: Knowledge value and information diversity in modern communication. XLinguae, 2018, vol. 11 (3), pp. 176-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.17

8. Smajs J. The philosophical conception of a constitution for the Earth. Human Affairs, 2015, vol. 25 (3), pp. 342-361. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0028

9. Foster C., Burkhardt H., Schoenfeld A. Crisis-ready educational design: The case of mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 2022, early view. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/curj.159 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cuij .159

10. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Communication foundation for intellectual culture: Tendencies of contemporary development. XLinguae, 2019, vol. 12 (4), pp. 212-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.18

11. Baeva L. V. Values of the changing world: Existential axiology of history: a monograph. Astrakhan, 2004. 275 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20066010

12. Meer F. The global crisis - a crisis of values and the domination of the weak by the strong. Journal of Human Values, 1999, vol. 5 (1), pp. 65-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097168589900500107

13. Danek J. Philosophical and societal elements of human upbringing. XLinguae, 2019, vol. 12 (4), pp. 66-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.06 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42254245

14. Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S., Latuha O. A., Pushkarev Yu. V., Begalinova K. K., Pushkareva E. A. Prospects of the post-digital university: Analysis of program documents in the field of education. Russian Journal of Regional Studies, 2022, vol. 30 (3), pp. 698-720.

110

© ®

2023, vol. 13, issue 2_ http://en.sciforedu.ru/

ISSN 2658-6762

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.120.030.202203.698-720 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49467874

15. Begalinova, K. K., Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S. Media-educational space as interaction between traditional and media sides of the educational process. Bulletin of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series: Philosophical Sciences, 2017, no. 3, pp. 78-83. (In Russian) URL: https : //www. elibrary. ru/item. asp ?id=30362072

16. Pushkareva E. A. Value foundations of interaction between modern education and science. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2014, 172 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24960640

17. Mills B., Wilner A. The science behind "values": Applying moral foundations theory to strategic foresight. Futures & Foresight Science, 2022, vol. 5 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.145 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.145

18. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Fundamental knowledge in the continuing education: methodology and axiology of the problem. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6 (1), pp. 87-98. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1601.08

19. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Continuous education philosophy in the context of global culture development. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6 (3), pp. 6067. (In Russian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1603.06

20. Pushkareva E. A., Pushkarev Y. V. Philosophy of continuing education: cognitive foundations of personal development in modern conditions. Monograph. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2019, 143 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43300997

21. Schwartz S. H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1992, vol. 25, pp. 165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960281-6

22. Qu Yu., Fu P. P., Sun C. Past, Present and Future of Personal Values Research: Inspirations from Literature. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2019, vol. 2019 (1), pp. 12235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.12235abstract

23. Schwartz S. H., Bilsky W. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, vol. 53, pp. 550-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550

24. Bardi A., Schwartz S. H. Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003, vol. 29, pp. 1207-1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602

25. Prentice D. A. Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, vol. 53, pp. 993-1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.993

26. Berson Y., Oreg S., Dvir T. CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2008, vol. 29, pp. 615-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.499

27. Zu L., Song L. Determinants of managerial values on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, vol. 88, pp. 105-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9828-7

28. Rohan M. J. A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2000, vol. 4, pp. 255-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4

29. Hitlin S., Piliavin J. A. Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review Sociology, 2004, vol. 30, pp. 359-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.SOC.30.012703.110640

© ®

111

30. Kirkman B. L., Lowe K. B., Gibson C. B. A quarter century of culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 2006, vol. 37 (3), pp. 285-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave .jibs. 8400202

31. Roccas S., Sagiv L. Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2010, vol. 4, pp. 30-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10T 111/J.1751-9004.2009.00234.X

32. Boer D., Fischer R. How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, vol. 139, pp. 1113-1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031347

33. Shabatura L., Yazovskikh A. Actualization of axology development: Problems, searches, solutions. Filosophiya-Philosophy, 2020, vol. 29 (4), pp. 383-390. URL: https : //www. elibrary. ru/item. asp ?id=44332344

34. Pawlowski A. Sustainable Development and Globalization. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 2013, vol. 8 (2), pp. 5-16. URL: https://paperity.org/p/230586292/sustainable-development-and-globalization

35. Voirol O. Solidarity as social reconstruction against "regressive communities", beyond the neoliberal agenda. Comparative Sociology, 2020, vol. 19 (6), pp. 708-728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341531

36. Blaj E.-C. On moral ideal between philosophy and religion in the globalizing context. CBU International Conference on Innovations in Science and Education, 2017, vol. 5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.982

37. Wilson M. COVID-19 and the modern plantation: Debunking the neoliberal moral economy. Cultural Dynamics, 2021, vol. 33 (3), pp. 185-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740211014310

38. Korobeynikova L. A., Zabulionite K. I. Reinterpretation of values of modern culture. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Cultural Studies and Art Criticism, 2017, no. 27, pp. 44-56. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/27/5 URL: https : //www. elibrary. ru/item. asp ?id=30672591

39. Aniskina N. V., Ukhova L. V. The axiological world view of a modern advertising consumer. Annales. Series Historia et Sociologia, 2015, vol. 25 (3), pp. 477-484. URL: http : //www. dlib. si/?URN=URN:NBN :SI: doc-WX 1V8YEN

40. Ivanovskaya, O. V. Identity crisis and sacralization in the globalizing world. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 7: Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies, 2011, no. 1, pp. 38-44. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16862554

41. Witteveen H. J. Economic globalization from a broader long-term perspective: Some questions and concerns. Economist, 1998, vol. 146 (4), pp. 539-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/AT003438914834

42. Urmanbetova J. K. Social isolation and loneliness. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2021, vol. 11 (1), pp. 247-253. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-24 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46264938

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

43. Daniel E., Bardi A., Fischer R., Benish-Weisman M., Lee J. A. Changes in personal values in pandemic times. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2021, vol. 13 (2), pp. 572-582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211024026

44. Ciravegna L., Michailova S. Why the world economy needs, but will not get, more globalization in the post-COVID-19 decade. Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, vol. 53 (1), pp. 172186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00467-6

112

© ®

2023, vol. 13, issue 2_ http://en.sciforedu.ru/

ISSN 2658-6762

45. Brakman S., Gattersen H., van Witteloostuijn A. Robots do not get the coronavirus: The COVID-19 pandemic and the international division of labor. Journal of International Business Studies, 2021, vol. 52 (6), pp. 1215-1224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00410-9

46. Contractor F. J. The world economy will need even more globalization in the post-pandemic 2021 decade. Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, vol. 53 (1), pp. 156-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00394-y

47. Thangavel P., Pathak P., Chandra B. Covid-19: Globalization-will the course change? Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 2022, vol. 26 (1), pp. 7-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920984571

48. Litonjua M. D. 'The Socio-Political Construction of Globalization'. International Review of Modern Sociology, 2008, vol. 34 (2), pp. 253-278. URL: https://www.academia.edu/26411940/THE_SOCIO_POLITICAL_CONSTRUCTION_OF_GLO BALIZATION

49. Arandjelovic O. On the Value of Life. The International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2022, online first. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ijap2022422169

50. Rahman M., Younus A., Uddin K. Crisis of Morals and Values: A Bangladesh Perspective. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 2018, vol. 6 (11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i11.3687

Submitted: 29 January 2023 Accepted: 10 March 2023 Published: 30 April 2023

Madina S. Ashilova

Contribution of the co-author: collection of materials and initiation of research; definition of research methodology; analysis of research data. Alibek S. Begalinov

Contribution of the co-author: collection of materials, preparation of the initial version of the text. Yury V. Pushkarev

Contribution of the co-author: structuring and analysis of research data. Kalimash K. Begalinova

Contribution of the co-author: the collection of materials; formulation of a scientific problem research and definition of the main directions of its decision; structuring and analysis of data. Elena A. Pushkareva

Contribution of the co-author: definition of research methodology; analysis of research data; general guidance.

G 0

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

The authors' stated contribution:

Information about competitive interests:

The authors claim that they do not have competitive interests.

Information about the Authors

Madina Serikbekovna Ashilova

PhD, Associate Professor,

Departments of International Communications,

Abylai Khan Kazakh University of International Relations and Foreign Languages,

Muratbayev str., 200, 050001, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-7727 E-mail: madina.almatytv@mail.ru (Corresponding Author)

Alibek Serikbekovich Begalinov

PhD, Professor-lecturer,

International Information Technology University, 34/1 Manas str., 050001, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7439-221X E-mail: alibek557@inbox.ru

Yury Viktorovich Pushkarev

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor,

Law and Philosophy Department,

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University,

28 Vilyuiskaya Str., 630126, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.

ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5919-7221

E-mail: pushkarev73@mail.ru

Kalimash Kapsamarovna Begalinova

Doctor of Philosophical Science, Professor, Department of Religious Studies and Cultural Studies, Al Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 Al-Farabi Ave., 050001, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5575-5142 E-mail: kalima910@mail.ru

Elena Aleksandrovna Pushkareva

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor,

Law and Philosophy Department,

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University,

28 Vilyuiskaya Str., 630126, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.

ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-6783

E-mail: pushkarev73@mail.ru

114

© ®

Science for Education Today

2023. Том 13. № 2

http://sciforedu.ru

ISSN 2658-6762

УДК 17.022.1+316.752+37.01 DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2302.05

Научная статья / Research Full Article Язык статьи: английский / Article language: English

Ценности в основании современного глобализирующегося общества:

исследование трансформаций

М. С. Ашилова1, А. С. Бегалинов2, Ю. В. Пушкарёв3, К. К. Бегалинова4, Е. А. Пушкарёва3

1 Казахский университет международных отношений и мировых языков имени Абылай Хана,

Алматы, Республика Казахстан

2 Международный университет информационных технологий, Алматы, Республика Казахстан

3 Новосибирский государственный педагогический университет, Новосибирск, Россия 4 Казахский национальный университет им. Аль-Фараби, Алматы, Республика Казахстан

Проблема и цель. Современная эпоха переживает затяжную пандемию, проблемы миграции, конфликты и другие глобальные катаклизмы. Причину многие исследователи видят в кризисе традиционных ценностей, который сегодня всё более явственен. Ценности и ценностные ориентации являются неотъемлемой частью жизни и культуры человека и общества, они определяют жизненные цели, а также пути и способы её достижения. Глобальные катаклизмы и непрерывные социальные изменения влекут за собой трансформацию системы ценностей, что находит отражение и в научно-исследовательской литературе, поскольку ученые, прежде всего, реагируют на особо острые и актуальные проблемы современности.

Основная цель исследования - определить, какие ценности сегодня лежат в основании современного глобализирующегося общества и каким трансформациям они подверглись в последние годы.

Методология. В связи с этим, был проведен анализ научно-исследовательской литературы, посвященной вопросам ценностей. За основу анализа была взята универсальная классификация ценностей, предложенная Ш. Шварцом. Основная методология - контент-анализ научно-исследовательской литературы на предмет употребляемости и встречаемости основных видов ценностей в научных работах базы Web of Science за период с 2017 по 2022 годы.

Финансирование проекта: Исследование выполнено в рамках научно-исследовательского проекта ИРН АР09058341 «Трансформация ценностей казахстанской системы высшего образования в условиях поликультурного и глобализирующегося мира» и выполняется в рамках грантового финансирования Министерства образования и науки Республики Казахстан.

Библиографическая ссылка: Ашилова М. С., Бегалинов А. С., Пушкарёв Ю. В., Бегалинова К. К., Пушкарёва Е. А. Ценности в основании современного глобализирующегося общества: исследование трансформаций // Science for Education Today. - 2023. - Т. 13, № 2. - С. 99-121. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2302.05

Автор для корреспонденции: Маднна С. Ашилова, madina.almatytv@mail.rii © М. С. Ашилова, А. С. Бегалинов, Ю. В. Пушкарёв, К. К. Бегалинова, Е. А. Пушкарёва, 2023

Science for Education Today

2023. Том 13. № 1 http://sciforedu.ru/ ISSN 2658-6762

Результаты. Результаты исследования: 1) встречаемость и употребляемость всех видов ценностей растет из года в год;

2) исследование показывает доминанту индивидуальных эгоистических ценностей перед общественными коллективными; 3) наиболее распространенные категории ценностей: independent, healthy, successful, responsible, capable. Наименее: broadminded, reciprocation of favors, self-indulgent, honoring elders, mature love, true friendship; 4) несмотря на социальные катаклизмы последних лет, основные ценности общества не изменились.

Таким образом, можно сделать вывод, что духовные ценности не представляют столь большого научного интереса, как материальные. Пандемия хоть и смогла заставить на время задуматься о моральных основаниях жизни, однако существенно на переоценку современных ценностей не повлияла. Тем не менее, исследователи подчеркивают, что внутри распадающейся культуры вызревают некоторые зачатки, прообразы другого (посттехнократического) периода культурного развития. Новая картина мира, по их мнению, будет строиться на преодолении антропоцентристских установок.

Заключение. Настоящее исследование дополнит представления о трансформации современных ценностей под воздействием пандемии, глобализации, катаклизм и других факторов. Его результаты будут полезны педагогам высших учебных заведений, философам образования и всем, кто интересуется проблемами высшего образования.

Ключевые слова: философия образования; пандемия; ценности образования; аксиология; цель образования; трансформация образования; кризис ценностей.

1. Gibbs P. Transdisciplinary possibilities after the pandemic // Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19. - Educational Philosophy and Theory. - 2020. -Vol. 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1777655

2. O'Dea X., Stern J. Virtually the same?: Online higher education in the post Covid-19 era // British Journal of Educational Technology. - 2022. - Vol. 53 (3). - P. 437-442. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13211 URL: https://onlineli-brary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13211

3. Phungsoonthorn T., Charoensukmongkol P. How does mindfulness help university employees cope with emotional exhaustion during the COVID-19 crisis? The mediating role of psychological hardiness and the moderating effect of workload // Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. - 2022. -Early View. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12826 URL: https://onlineli-brary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjop.12826

4. Tkacova H., Pavlikova M., Jenisova Z., Maturkanic P., Kralik R. Social media and students' well-being: An empirical analysis during the Covid-19 pandemic // Sustainability. - 2021. -Vol. 13 (18). - P. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810442

5. Yang L.-P., Xin T. Changing Educational Assessments in the Post-COVID-19 Era: From Assessment of Learning (AoL) to Assessment as Learning (AaL) // Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. - 2022. - Vol. 41 (1). - P. 54-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emip.12492 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12492

6. Zhang L., Allen Carter R., Qian X., Yang S., Rujimora J., Wen S. Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID-19 // British Journal of Educational Technology. - 2022. - Vol. 53 (3). - P. 620-646. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13191 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13191

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

Science for Education Today

2023. Том 13. № 1 http://sciforedu.ru/ ISSN 2658-6762

7. Pushkarev Yu. V., Pushkareva E. A. Philosophical interpretation of knowledge and information: Knowledge value and information diversity in modern communication // XLinguae. - 2018. -Vol. 11 (3). - P. 176-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.17

8. Smajs J. The philosophical conception of a constitution for the Earth // Human Affairs. - 2015. -Vol. 25 (3). - P. 342-361. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2015-0028

9. Foster C., Burkhardt H., Schoenfeld A. Crisis-ready educational design: The case of mathematics // The Curriculum Journal. - 2022. - Early View. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/curj.159 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/curj .159

10. Pushkarev Y. V., Pushkareva E. A. Communication foundation for intellectual culture: tendencies of contemporary development // XLinguae. - 2019. - Vol. 12 (4). - P. 212-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.18

11. Баева Л. В. Ценности изменяющегося мира: Экзистенциальная аксиология истории: монография. - Астрахань, 2004. - 275 с. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20066010

12. Meer F. The Global Crisis - A Crisis of Values and the Domination of the Weak by the Strong // Journal of Human Values. - 1999. - Vol. 5 (1). - P. 65-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097168589900500107

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

13. Danek J. Philosophical and societal elements of human upbringing // XLinguae. -2019. -Vol. 12 (4). - P. 66-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.06 URL: https://www.eli-brary.ru/item.asp?id=42254245

14. Ashilova M. S., Begalinov A. S., Latuha O. A., Pushkarev Yu. V., Begalinova K. K., Pushkareva E. A. Prospects of the post-digital university: analysis of program documents in the field of education // Russian Journal of Regional Studies. - 2022. - Vol. 30 (3). - P. 698-720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.120.030.202203.698-720 URL: https://www.eli-brary.ru/item.asp?id=49467874

15. Бегалинова, К. К., Ашилова М. С., Бегалинов А. С. Медиавоспитательное пространство как взаимодействие традиционных и медийных сторон воспитательного процесса // Вестник МГПУ. Серия: Философские науки. - 2017. - № 3. - С. 78-83. URL: https://www.eli-brary.ru/item.asp?id=30362072

16. Пушкарёва Е. А. Ценностные основания современного взаимодействия образования и науки: монография. - Новосибирск: Изд-во НГПУ, 2014. - 172 с. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24960640

17. Mills B., Wilner A. The science behind "values": Applying moral foundations theory to strategic foresight // Futures & Foresight Science. - 2022. - Vol. 5 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.145 URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffo2.145

18. Пушкарёв Ю. В., Пушкарёва Е. А. Фундаментальное знание в непрерывном образовательном процессе: методология и аксиология проблемы // Вестник Новосибирского государственного педагогического университета. - 2016. - № 1. - С. 87-98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1601.08

19. Пушкарёв Ю. В., Пушкарёва Е. А. Философия непрерывного образования в контексте развития глобальной культуры // Вестник Новосибирского государственного педагогического университета. - 2016. - № 3. - С. 60-67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1603.06

20. Пушкарёва Е. А., Пушкарёв Ю. В. Философия непрерывного образования: когнитивные основания развития личности в современных условиях. - Новосибирск, 2019. - 143 c. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43300997

2023. Tom 13. № 1 http://sciforedu.ru/ ISSN 2658-6762

21. Schwartz S. H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. - 1992. - Vol. 25. - P. 165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960281-6

22. Qu Yu., Fu P. P., Sun C. Past, Present and Future of Personal Values Research: Inspirations from Literature // Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. - 2019. - Vol. 2019 (1). -P. 12235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.12235abstract

23. Schwartz S. H., Bilsky W. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. - 1987. - Vol. 53. - P. 550-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550

24. Bardi A., Schwartz S. H. Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. - 2003. - Vol. 29. - P. 1207-1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203254602

25. Prentice D. A. Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes, and values // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. - 1987. - Vol. 53. - P. 993-1003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.993

26. Berson Y., Oreg S., Dvir T. CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes // Journal of Organizational Behavior. - 2008. - Vol. 29. - P. 615-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.499

27. Zu L., Song L. Determinants of managerial values on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China // Journal of Business Ethics. - 2009. - Vol. 88. - P. 105-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9828-7

28. Rohan M. J. A rose by any name? The values construct // Personality and Social Psychology Review. - 2000. - Vol. 4. - P. 255-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4

29. Hitlin S., Piliavin J. A. Values: Reviving a dormant concept // Annual Review Sociology. - 2004. -Vol. 30. - P. 359-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.SOC.30.012703.110640

30. Kirkman B. L., Lowe K. B., Gibson C. B. A quarter century of culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework // Journal of International Business Studies. - 2006. - Vol. 37 (3). - P. 285-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pal-grave .jibs.8400202

31. Roccas S., Sagiv L. Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. - 2010. - Vol. 4. - P. 30-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1751-9004.2009.00234.X

32. Boer D., Fischer R. How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages // Psychological Bulletin. - 2013. - Vol. 139. -P. 1113-1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031347

33. Shabatura L., Yazovskikh A. Actualization of Axology Development: Problems, Searches, Solutions // Filosophiya-Philosophy. - 2020. - Vol. 29 (4). - P. 383-390. URL: https://www.eli-brary.ru/item.asp?id=44332344

34. Pawlowski A. Sustainable Development and Globalization // Problemy Ekorozwoju. - 2013. -Vol. 8 (2). - P. 5-16. URL: https://paperity.org/p/230586292/sustainable-development-and-glob-alization

35. Voirol O. Solidarity as Social Reconstruction Against "Regressive Communities", beyond the Neoliberal Agenda // Comparative Sociology. - 2020. - Vol. 19 (6). - P. 708-728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341531

36. Blaj E.-C. On Moral Ideal Between Philosophy and Religion in the Globalizing Context // CBU International Conference on Innovations in Science and Education. - 2017. - Vol. 5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.982

Science for Education Today

2023. Том 13. № 1 http://sciforedu.ru/ ISSN 2658-6762

37. Wilson M. COVID-19 and the modern plantation: Debunking the neoliberal moral economy // Cultural Dynamics. - 2021. - Vol. 33 (3). - P. 185-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09213740211014310

38. Коробейникова Л. А., Забулионите К. И. Реинтерпретация ценностей современной культуры // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Культурология и искусствоведение. - 2017. - Vol. 27. - P. 44-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/27Z5 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30672591

39. Aniskina N. V., Ukhova L. V. The Axiological World View of a Modern Advertising Consumer // Annales. Series historia et sociologia. - 2015. - Vol. 25 (3). - P. 477-484. URL: http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:doc-WX1V8YEN

40. Ивановская, О. В. Кризис и сакрализация идентичности в глобализирующемся мире // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 7: Философия. Социология и социальные технологии. - 2011. - № 1 (13). - С. 38-44. URL: https://www.eli-brary.ru/item.asp?id=16862554

41. Witteveen H. J. Economic globalization from a broader long-term perspective: Some questions and concerns // Economist. - 1998. - Vol. 146 (4). - P. 539-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1003438914834

42. Урманбетова Ж. К. Социальная изоляция и одиночество // Профессиональное образование в современном мире. - 2021. - № 1. - С. 247-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-24 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46264938

43. Daniel E., Bardi A., Fischer R., Benish-Weisman M., Lee J. A. Changes in Personal Values in Pandemic Times // Social Psychological and Personality Science. - 2021. - Vol. 13 (2). - P. 572582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211024026

44. Ciravegna L., Michailova S. Why the world economy needs, but will not get, more globalization in the post-COVID-19 decade // Journal of International Business Studies. - 2022. - Vol. 53 (1). -P. 172-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00467-6

45. Brakman S., Gattersen H., van Witteloostuijn A. Robots do not get the coronavirus: The COVID-19 pandemic and the international division of labor // Journal of International Business Studies. -2021. - Vol. 52 (6). - P. 1215-1224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00410-9

46. Contractor F. J. The world economy will need even more globalization in the post-pandemic 2021 decade // Journal of International Business Studies. - 2022. - Vol. 53 (1). - P. 156-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00394-y

47. Thangavel P., Pathak P., Chandra B. Covid-19: Globalization-Will the Course Change? // Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. - 2022. - Vol. 26 (1). - P. 7-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920984571

48. Litonjua M. D. 'The Socio-Political Construction of Globalization' // International Review of Modern Sociology. - 2008. - Vol. 34 (2). - P. 253-278. URL: https://www.aca-demia.edu/26411940/THE_SOCIO_POLITICAL_CONSTRUCTION_OF_GLOBALIZATION

49. Arandjelovic O. On the Value of Life // The International Journal of Applied Philosophy. - 2022. -Online First. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ijap2022422169

50. Rahman M., Younus A., Uddin K. Crisis of Morals and Values: A Bangladesh Perspective // International Journal of Social Science Studies. - 2018. - Vol. 6 (11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i11.3687

Поступила: 29 января 2023 Принята: 11 марта 2023 Опубликована: 30 апреля 2023

Science for Education Today

2023. Том 13. № 1 http://sciforedu.ru/ ISSN 2658-6762

Заявленный вклад авторов:

Ашилова Мадина С.: сбор материалов и инициация исследования; определение методологии исследования; анализ данных исследования.

Бегалинов Алибек С.: сбор материалов, подготовка начального варианта текста.

Пушкарёв Юрий В.: структурирование и анализ данных исследования.

Бегалинова Калимаш К.: сбор материалов; постановка научной проблемы исследования и определение основных направлений ее решения; структурирование и анализ данных.

Пушкарёва Елена А.: определение методологии исследования; анализ данных исследования; общее руководство.

Ашилова Мадина Серикбековна

доктор философии PhD, ассоциированный профессор, кафедра международных коммуникаций,

Казахский университет международных отношений и мировых

языков имени Абылай Хана, ул. Муратбаева, 200, 050001, Алматы, Республика Казахстан. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-7727 E-mail: madina.almatytv@mail.ru

Бегалинов Алибек Серикбекович

доктор философии PhD, профессор-лектор, кафедра медиакоммуникаций и истории Казахстана, Международный университет информационных технологий, ул. Манаса 34/1, 050001, Алматы, Республика Казахстан. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7439-221X E-mail: alibek557@inbox.ru

Пушкарёв Юрий Викторович

кандидат философских наук, доцент, кафедра права и философии,

Новосибирский государственный педагогический университет, Вилюйская ул., 28, 630126, г. Новосибирск, Россия. ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5919-7221 E-mail: pushkarev73@mail.ru

Информация о конфликте интересов:

Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов.

Информация об авторах

Science for Education Today

2023. Том 13. № 1 http://sciforedu.ru/ ISSN 2658-6762

Бегалинова Калимаш Капсамаровна

доктор философских наук, профессор,

кафедра религиоведения и культурологии,

Казахский национальный университет им. Аль-Фараби,

пр. Аль-Фараби, 71, 050001, Алматы, Республика Казахстан.

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5575-5142

E-mail: kalima910@mail.ru

Пушкарёва Елена Александровна

доктор философских наук, профессор, кафедра права и философии,

Новосибирский государственный педагогический университет, Вилюйская ул., 28, 630126, г. Новосибирск, Россия. ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-6783 E-mail: pushkarev73@mail.ru

VALUES IN FOUNDATION OF MODERN GLOBALIZING SOCIETY: CHANGE STUDY Текст научной статьи по специальности «СМИ (медиа) и массовые коммуникации»

Текст научной работы на тему «VALUES IN FOUNDATION OF MODERN GLOBALIZING SOCIETY: CHANGE STUDY»