CC BY
385
USE OF CLAY MINERAL TO REDUCE AMMONIUM FROM WASTEWATER. EFFECT OF VARIOUS PARAMETERS
S. Eturki*, F. Ayari**
A AAA
, N. Jedidi , H. Ben Dhia
*Laboratory of treatment and recycle of water, Water Researches and Technologies Centre, touristy Road of Borj Cedria, B.P. 273 Soliman 8020, Tunisia Uniti MatSriaux du centre de recherche et de technologie de I’Snergie technopole Borj-Cedria,
B.P. 95-2050 Hammam-Lif Tunisia Water, Energy National School of the Engineers of Sfax,
Road of Soukra Km 3,5 Sfax 3038 Tunisia, fadhilaayari @ yahoo.fr
This article investigates the potential of clay material (bentonite), having the following structure formula Ca0>014Nao>404K0>16(Si7> 65Ala35)(Al2>910Fe0> 762Mg0>376)O22, as an ion exchange medium for ammonium removal from effluent and watercourse. Batch experiments were carried out indicating that bentonite is highly selective for the ammonium ion. Experimental data show that 94% of ammonium was removed from aqueous solution in comparison with its initial concentration, with an overall ion exchange capacity of =50 meq/100g medium: on average. Batch tests were performed under a range of conditions to assess the effect of contact time, solution pH, solution concentration and temperature on the performance and capacity of the media for this application. A detailed examination of the data shows that increasing solution concentration and increased contact time provide the best performance at an optimum pH between 6 and 8. Adsorption capacity varied from 34 to 48 meq/100g with temperature increasing from 20 to 40°C, therefore ammonium removal was controlled essentially by an endothermic process based on chemisorption phenomena. The Langmuir and Freundlich models (isotherms) were applied to the data obtained from the batch studies. It seems that the second model fits well with the experimental data, since it exhibits more satisfactory correlation coefficient value (0.97 and 0.45, respectively).
УДК 661.183.23
INTRODUCTION
Nitrogen is essential and main nutrient for all forms of life. It constitutes a basic building block of plant and animal proteins. Nevertheless, an excessive amount of nitrogen can be toxic.
Domestic wastewaters comprise, amongst other constituents, organic nitrogen compounds derived from urine [1], which during transport to wastewater treatment works, can be decomposed to form ammonium, which is a problem of environmental and economic concern. Major sources of impurities include: nitrogen fertilizers production, chemical fiber plants, aquaculture industry, agricultural run-off and others.
The degree of nitrogen contamination of water has increased because of large quantities of industrial and domestic wastewater discharges into the environment. With its increased concentrations in domestic wastewaters, nitrogen’s share is becoming quite significant among other pollutants.
The excess of nitrogen in the environment has caused crucial distortions in the natural nutrient cycle between organisms and the soil, water, and atmosphere. Nitrogen in the form of nitrous oxide, nitric oxide, nitrate, nitrite or ammonia/ammonium is soluble in water, so it can be found in ground and drinking water [2].
Nitrogen pollution in hydrosphere causes eutrophication of lakes and rivers all over the world. The ammonia and ammonium ions, which cause undesired odors and several diseases, are the most commonly encountered nitrogenous compounds in wastewaters [3].
In aqueous solutions, ammonia occurs in two forms depending on the pH, ion strength and temperature [4]
NH4+ + OH- NH3 + H2O
The excess of the compounds mentioned above leads to the eutrophication of water basins, disturbs the ecological balance and spoils the water quality. It is not uncommon for consent levels for NH4+ to be as low as 1mgl-1 [5].
Because of ammonium toxicity, its complete removal from wastewaters is required. Many biological and physicochemical methods are used. Among the technologies for ion control are processes such as air stripping, breakpoint chlorination, nitrification/denitrification, adsorption by activated carbon, chemical co-
© S. Eturki, F. Ayari, N. Jedidi, H. Ben Dhia, Электронная обработка материалов, 2012, 48(3), 102-110.
102
agulation and ion exchange [6]. The advantages of the latter process became more obvious when effective, low-cost materials were used as exchangers [7], for example, silicate clay minerals used in sorption on a solid substrate [3]. So, from a practical standpoint, ion exchange is one of the most promising techniques. Therefore it is often examined in detail by different authors using various sorbents [8-10]. It seems important to state here that by means of various investigations it has been found that the efficiency of the air stripping and biological nitrification-denitrification processes is significantly impaired by low temperature in winter [11, 12].
Clay mineral seems to be a very promising material. It has high cation-exchange ability; it can be used as molecular sieve. It is a low cost material with a high selectivity towards the ammonium ions in the presence of other concurrent cations in the wastewater [13] and is widely spread in nature. The natural material can be modified thermally or chemically to improve its adsorption capacity. The adsorption of ammonium with clay mineral is the result of ion exchange and/or adsorption. Both processes are parallel and usually one of them prevails depending on the solid-to-liquid ratio.
1. MATERIALS AND METHODS
1.1. CLAY ADSORBENTS
Bentonite used as adsorbent in the present study, was collected from Grombalia (North-East of Tunisia) and purified in laboratory conditions [14] to remove carbonates, quartz and organic matter. Next, the bentonite was dispersed in distilled water and the clay fraction (2<m) was recovered by sedimentation. The solid phase was then saturated with sodium ions by stirring in a 1M sodium chloride solution, six times. The saturation was achieved and the solid was washed with distilled water to remove excess salt. The material thus obtained is called sodium-exchanged bentonite or Na-bentonite.
1.2. CLAY ADSORBENTS PROPERTIES
The cation exchange capacity of bentonite was determined with methylene-blue method and Kjeld-hal method [15]. The adsorption of methylene blue dye on bentonite in solutions is used to determine either their cation-exchange capacities (CEC) or their total specific surface area (Ss).
In a series of 100 ml glass bottles, 20 ml of sorbent dosage (2 g/l) and a variable volume of methylene blue at initial concentration 0.5 g/l were placed in consecutive order. The mixtures were kept at room temperature during 1 h under stirring. After centrifugation, the supernatant was dosed colorimetrically at kmax = 665 nm (fig. 1). The amounts of each adsorbed solution was determined. These values allowed the determination of both CEC and Ss (table 1).
The highest values of Ss and CEC indicate that they contain a large amount of bentonite.
Fig. 1. Uptake of BM by clay sample before (A) and after purification (B) to estimate CEC and Ss of the clay sample Qads: Amount of MB adsorbed by clay sample. C: initial concentration of MB
Table 1. Most important properties of the Na-bentonite
SBET(m2g 1) Ss(m2g-1)** CEC (meq/100g)*** TT / 3 \**** Vp(cm g)
102 524.2 75 0.0018
SBEt - BET surface - Ss -total Specific surface - Cation Exchange Capacity - total pore volumes
103
Measurements of the external surface area (Sbet) and total pore volume were conducted by means of BET instrument (Quantachrom Autosorb1). Using the software provided by Quantachrom Autosorbi, the instrument performs physical adsorption and desorption of gases. All procedures are workable with nitrogen. Before analysis, the samples were degassed at 150°C for 24h, until the pressure in the tubes stabilized at 10-6 mmHg. During the analysis, pure (99.99%) nitrogen penetrates into the sample in order to obtain the required pressure P/P0 (an adequate number of points to calculate the isotherms). To do so, the sample is immersed in a container filled with liquid nitrogen. Next, nitrogen dosage (adsorption) is continued until the atmospheric pressure is reached, which is followed by the reverse process (desorption) [16].
The most important properties of the purified sample are illustrated in table 1.
The mineralogical analysis of the selected Na-bentonite was performed to determine mineralogical composition by x-ray diffraction, which indicates that bentonite was the major fraction of this clay mineral. The chemical composition of Na-bentonite obtained by using atomic adsorption spectroscopy testifies to the presence of silica, alumina and iron as major constituents along with minority amounts of calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium,oxides (table 2).
Table 2. Chemical composition of purified clay [Na-bentonite] (wt %)
Constituents SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO Na2O K2O Loss of ignition
% weight 52.93 19.17 7.04 0.12 1.74 1.45 0.92 16.63
With the method introduced by Charles Mauguin [17], the formula of the structure has been determined as follows: Cao,014Nao,404Ko,16(Si7, 65Alo,35)(Al2,91oFeo, 762Mg0,376)O22.
Observations and analysis of chemical composition of the reaction products in micro-range were carried out using field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with the energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). Therefore description of mineral grains morphology and determination of chemical composition in microareas (SEM-EDS) were given consequently in table 3, fig. 2,a,b.
Table 3. Atomic and weight percentage of major constituents in the raw (*) and purified (**) clay
Elements Weig it (%) Atomic (%)
O 44,866* 46,451** 62,798* 63,716**
Na 0.000* 0.708 ** 0.000* 0.675**
Al 12.920* 14.913** 10.722* 12.129**
Si 22.356* 20.786** 17.825* 16.242**
K 2.563* 2.767** 1.468* 1.553**
Ca 1.597* 0.229** 0.892* 0.125**
Fe 15.698* 14.147** 6.295* 5.559**
Fig. 2,a. Spectrum EDS of bentonite before (A) and after purification (B)
104
Fig. 2,b. SEM microphotographs of the bentonite before (A) and (B) after purification
2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 2.1 ADSORPTION STUDIES
Adsorption of ammonium on the prepared Na+-sorbents was determined using the batch method. A fixed amount of the sorbent (0.1g) was added to 50 ml of ammonium solution, the mixture was agitated for a predetermined time under constant temperature (25±2°C), and the pH of all solutions in contact with the solid solution was adjusted at pH 6. The concentration of the non eliminated ammonium in the aqueous phase was analyzed using the standard Nessler reagent method employing a Perkin-Elmer 402 UV spectrophotometer. The sensitivity of the method was 0.1 pg/ml, the measurement error ranged from 0.1 to
0.2 pgmL-1, while the reproducibility error was 0.1-0.5 pgml-1 [18].
Ammonium concentration in the solid phase was calculated using the following mass balance equation [19, 20]:
gads = (Ci - Cres) V /m (2)
where Qads is the amount of ammonium in the solid phase; Q is the initial ammonium concentration in solution; Cres is the ammonium remaining in solution at equilibrium; V is the solution volume; m is the mass of clay introduced.
The ammonium removal percentage (P%) was calculated using the following relationship:
P% = 100(Ci - Cres)/Ci (3)
The considered equilibrium adsorption capacities at different initial concentrations are presented in Fig. 3, where the isotherm is S type [21], assuming monolayer adsorption. The results indicated a high affinity for ammonium removal in the range of 60% compared to the CEC of the used clay. The percentage of ammonium removal from aqueous solution reaches 88% compared with the initial ammonium solution. So. It is possible to conclude that the uptake of NH4+ by Na-bentonite is very significant. This material has an increased ammonium exchange capacity measured up to that of naturally occurring materials used in [13].
Ammonium ions are removed on to the solid solution (Na-bentonite) by exchange with the interlayer cations of the clay sample (Na-bentonite) either by adsorption in its pores aluminosilicate groups. Ion exchange prevails when concentration of ammonium is equal or less than the concentration of exchangeable cations of the clay material, and adsorption begins to predominate with increase of ammonium content [22].
As is shown in fig. 3, at higher initial concentrations the initial rate of uptake is far greater than at lower concentrations, This can be attributed to the fact that higher concentrations result in a higher solute gradient, providing the necessary driving force for ammonium ions to replace cations in the media framework for a given contact time [23, 24]. Increasing concentration also results in a higher equilibrium capacity being obtained for any given set of conditions. Initially a sharp increase in capacity can be observed with increasing concentration, reaching a maximum, in this case ~ 47,56 meq/100g, at an initial solution concentration of 9 mgL-1 NH4+ (fig. 3). It was noticed that the value 94% of the amount of ammonium elimination was reached. This maximum value is indicative of the fact that the ion exchange surface (adsorption process) and the cation exchange process (chemisorption) with cations of the interlayer freedom are increasingly saturated with the ammonium ion [25], which is reflected by the accompanying reduction in removal efficiency [26] and occurrence of plateau in isotherm. This is the maximum amount of ammonium which can be exchanged by adsorption and by exchangeable cation process onto this used material under experimental conditions, but after this point further increase in solution concentration is ineffective in raising the media’s capac-
105
ity (fig. 3). To sum up it is not claimed that the ion exchange occurs faster between the solution and the basal planes than between the solution and the interlayer planes, because, in the latter case, ions must diffuse into (and out of) the interlayer space prior to any sorption process.
2.2. EFFECT OF CONTACT TIME
The adsorption data of NH4+ by Na-bentonite versus contact time, at different intervals from 5 min to 120 min, are given in fig. 4.
The amounts of NH4+ adsorbed by the sample under study were determined at different times from initial solutions of ammonium equal to the cation exchange capacity and a sorbent dosage (0.1 g/50 ml). All the experiments conducted by the authors of the present article were at pH6. The plots representing adsorption of NH4+ on Na+-bentonite visualize three distinct phases: the first phase indicates the instantaneous sorption of ammonium within 10 min of contact time, the second one shows a gradual equilibrium and the third one indicates the final equilibrium. The uptake of ammonium on Na+-bentonite reaches equilibrium in 20 to 25 min. Consequently, it can be seen that the uptake was very rapid and it attained equilibrium at 25 min with 87.2% of ammonium removed.
times
Fig. 4. Effect of contact time in NH4+ removal by Na-bentonite
2.3. EFFECT OF INITIAL PH
The term ammonia came from chemical-related use in approximately 1799 and is derived from the name of the ancient Egyptian deity Ammon. In this context, ammonia means the gas emitted by camel dung and urine in the vicinity of temples honoring Ammon [27]. This info seems irrelevant here. Today, ammonia is understood as the result of the bacterial decomposition of organic matter containing nitrogen. For instance, the degradation of the simple organic molecule urea ((NH2)2CO) in water:
(NH2)2CO + H2O ~ 2NH3 + CO2 (4)
results in the formation of un-ionized ammonia (NH3) and carbon dioxide (CO2). At the same time, complex organic molecules present in industrial and municipal wastes, plants and animal matter also form NH3 when degraded. Therefore, in aqueous solution, ammonia exists in two forms as a function of pH, ion strength and temperature, as described previously [4]: non-ionised ammonia (NH3) or ionised ammonium (NH4+), according to the following equations:
106
NH4+ +OH- ^NH3 +H2O (5)
NH3 +H3O+^ NH4+ +H2O (6)
Ammonia-ammonium equilibrium in solution is largely pH dependant [28], only the ionised form can be removed from solution by ion exchange. At pH 8 and below the substantial majority of ammoniacal nitrogen is present in the ionised form, therefore, it is reasonable to assume that these conditions would best favour the removal process. Above pH 8 the equilibrium shifts rapidly towards the non-ionised form and these conditions become increasingly less favourable.
Since pH medium has a big effect on the amount of NH4+ removal, a series of experiences has been conducted at different pH of solution from acid medium (pH 2) to basic medium (pH 8) to establish the optimum pH range for ammonium removal using Na-bentonite. Results (fig. 5) show that at pH 6 elimination of ammonium by Na-bentonite reaches ~ 90% of its initial concentration that confirms that pH values of 8 and below are best suited to the ion exchange process, with the optimum removal being achieved at pH 6. Hence equilibrium capacity of 50 meq/100g is achieved at pH 6 in comparison to 42 meq/100g at pH 8. Moreover it was noted that removal efficiency decreases rapidly at pH 2, equilibrium capacity is reduced to 35 meq/100g.
This is in agreement with results reported elsewhere that NH4+ removal efficiency decreases rapidly at pH values above 10 [23, 29, 30], which can be explained by the fact that under alkaline pH conditions, the ammonium ion becomes neutralised by the hydroxyl ion, rendering it uncharged [30]. However, at pH below 6 performance is reduced, this being attributed to the fact that the increased number of hydrogen ions in solution provides added competition for exchange sites [29, 30].
Na-bentonite removed by the used clay mineral
2.4. EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE
The temperature range used in the present study was 20 to 400C. The amount of ammonium removed onto solid solution increases with temperature increasing, since adsorption process is of a chemical nature (chemisorption). In such cases an increase of temperature can favour the reaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent, thereby enhancing the capacity of adsorption. Some studies, such as those conducted by Lancia et al. [31, 32], have shown that chemical adsorption can happen above 200°C, when using zeolite as adsorbent. Hence ammonium removal from aqueous solution is controlled essentially by an endothermic process. The effect of temperature on the ammonium adsorption by the used clay was presented in isotherms in fig. 6, which illustrate the efficiency of ammonia retention with the temperature increasing. At 40°C the amount of ammonium removal onto solid solution reach 94% compared to the ammonium initial concentration.
3. MODELLING
The adsorption data follow the empirical Freundlich isotherm [34], which is applicable to nonspecific adsorption on a heterogeneous solid surface. In order to ascertain whether the adsorption is chemi-sorptive in nature with chemical forces binding NH4+ ions to the surface of the clay minerals, the experimental data are also correlated with the Langmuir isotherm [33]. The results show good linearity with Freundlich model (Freundlich plots, R2 = 0.97, Langmuir plots, R2 = 0.48, with R2 the correlation coefficient).
As was earlier reported by F. Ayari and all [36], the linear forms of Langmuir and Freundlich equations were represented respectively by the folowing equations, respectively:
C/(x/m) = 1/a + b/aC (7)
and
107
x/m = k-Cn (8)
where C is the equilibrium concentration of solute (g-L-1), x/m is the amount of solute adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent (g g-1 of clay), a and b are the sorption constants of the Langmuir equation, k and n are the sorption constants of the Freundlich equation [34].
The values of the adsorption coefficients, computed from Langmuir and Freundlich plots, are given in table 4, and we give the curves of the linear form of Langmuir and Freundlich models in fig. 7 and fig. 8, respectively. As can be seen from table 4, fig. 7 and fig. 8, the experimental adsorption data fit well only with the Freundlich model. As a result, the adsorption of ammonium with the bentonite investigated here, was asserted with a non-specific adsorption mechanism, since the experimental adsorption data fit only the Freundlich model (R2 = 0.9).
We reported [35] that for the favourable adsorption 0<R2<1; while R2>1 represents unfavourable adsorption, and R2 = 1 indicates liner adsorption 0<R2<1, as is shown in table 4.
Table 4. Langmuir and Freundlich parameters of adsorption isotherms
Langmuir parameters a (Lg-1) b(Lg-1) R2
0.006 0.068 0.487
Freundlich parameters k n R2
0.155 0.913 0.977
Fig. 7. Langmuir plots for the adsorption of NH4+ by Fig. 8. Freundlich plots for the adsorption of NH4+
Na- bentonite at room temperature and at pH 6
by Na- bentonite at room temperature and at pH 6
4. CONCLUSION
In this study, the effect of some parameters, such as pH, temperature, contact time....on ammonium removal from aqueous solution onto betonites was evaluated. Experiments were performed in the batch mode. A higher ammonium removal rate was obtained at higher concentrations and neutral pH.
The time necessary to achieve adsorption equilibrium for NH4+ ions from aqueous solution onto the used clay mineral was 20 min. The Freundlich model provided a good description of NH4+ ion sorption since adsorption was found to be chemisorption. The amounts of NH4+ ions sorbed increased, with increasing initial NH4+ ion concentration, thereby demonstrating the importance of diffusion in the adsorption process. The maximum sorption capacity of bentonite for NH4+ ions removal from aqueous solution reached 47,56 meq/100g of sorbent for an initial NH4+ ion concentration of 9 mgL-1.
The effectiveness of NH4+ ion sorption by the sample increased with temperature increasing since ammonium adsorption was an endothermic process.
REFERENCES
1. Hedstrom A. Ion Exchange of Ammonium in Zeolites: a Literature Review. J. Environ. Eng. 2001, 127(8), 673-681.
2. Cerjan M. Rozic, Stefanovic S., Kurajica S., Vaneina V. and Hodzic E.. Ammoniacal Nitrogen Removal from Water by Treatment with Clays and Zeolites. Water Research. 2000, 34(14), 3675-3681.
3. Balci S. Nature of Ammonium Ion Adsorption by Sepiolite: Analysis of Equilibrium Data with Several Isotherms. Water Research. 2004, 38, 1129-1138.
4. Burgess R.M., Pelletier M.C., Ho. K.T., Serbst J.R., Ryba S.A., Kuhn A., Perron M.M., Raczelowski P., Cantwell M.G. Removal of Ammonia Toxicity in Marine Sediment TIEs: a Comparison of Ulva Lactuca, Zeolite and Aeration Methods. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2003, 46, 607-618.
108
5. Pearce O., Clark T., Ndombasi P. Ammonnia Removal from Sludge Liquors. Thames Water Plc, Research and Technology Report. 2000.
6. Townsend R.P., Loizidou M. Ion-exchange Properties of Natural Clinoptilolite, Ferrierite and Mordenite:
1. Sodiumammonium Equilibria. Zeolites. 1984, 4, 191-195.
7. Sprynskyy M., Lebedynets M., Terzyk A.P., Kowalczyk P., Namiesnik J., Buszewski B. Ammonium Sorption from Aqueous Solutions by the Natural Zeolite Transcarpathian Clinoptilolite Studied under Dynamic Conditions. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2005, 284, 408-415.
8. Balci S. Nature of Ammonium Ion Adsorption by Sepiolite: Analysis of Equilibrium data with Several Isotherms. Water Research. 2004, 38, 1129-1138.
9. Wang Y., Lin F., Pang W. Ion Exchange Ammonium in Natural and Synthesized Zeolites. Journal Hazardous Materials. 2008, 160, 371-375.
10. Ivanova E., Karsheve M., Kumanova B. Adsorption of Ammonium Ions onto Natural Zeolite. Journal of the University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy. 2010, 45(3), 295-302.
11. Gefeniene A., Kauspediene D., Snukiskis J. Performance of Sulphonic Cation Exchangers in the Recovery of Ammonium from Basic and Slight Acidic Solutions. Journal of Hazardous Materials B. 2006, 135, 180-187.
12. Du Q., Liu S., Cao Z., Wang Y. Ammonia Removal from Aqueous Solution Using Natural Chinese Clinoptilolite. Separation and Purification Technology. 2005, 44, 229-234.
13. Ayari F., Srasra E. and Trabelsi-Ayadi M. Effect of Exchangeable Cations on the Physicochemical Properties of Smectite. Journal of Surface Engineering and Applied Electrochemistry. 2007, 43(5), 369-378.
14. Ayari F., Srasra E. and Trabelsi-Ayadi M. Characterization of Bentonitic Clays and their use as Adsorbent. Desalination. 2005, 185, 391-397.
15. Page A.L., Miller R.H. and Keeney D.R. Kjeldhal N2 Analysis; Methods of Soil Analysis; American Society of Agronomy; INC. Soil Science Society of America INC. Publisher Madison; Wisconsin USA, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Proprieties, Second Edition. 1982, 597-618.
16. Derkowski A., Franus W., Waniak -Nowicka H., Czfmerova A. Textural Properties vs. CEC and EGME retention of Na-X Zeolite Prepared from Fly ash at Room Temperature. International Journal of Mineral Processing. 2007, 82, 57-68.
17. Mauguin. C. Etude Des Micas au Moyen des RX Bull. Soc. Fr. Miner. 1928, 269, 815-818.
18. Lebedynets M., Sprynskyy. M., Sakhnyuk I., Zbytniews.Radoslaw, Golembiewski R. and Buszewski B. Adsorption of Ammonium Ions onto a Natural Zeolite: Transcarpathian Clinoptilolite. Adsorption Science & Technology. 2004, 22, 9.
19. Demir A., Gunay A., Debik E. Ammonium Removal from Aqueous Solution by Ion Exchange using Packed Bed Natural Zeolite. Water SA. 2002, 28(3), 329-336.
20. Jorgensen S.E., Libor O., Graber K.L., Barkacs K. Ammonia Removal by use of Clinoptilolite. Water Res. 1976, 10, 213-224.
21. Sposito G., ed., Surface Chemistry of Soils. New York, Oxford University Press, 1984. 223.
22. Jorgensen S.E., Libor O. Ammonia Removal by use of Clinoptilolite. Water Research. 1976, 10, 213-119.
23. Du Q., Shijun Liu Q.D., Zhonghong C., Wang Y. Ammonia Removal from Aqueous Solution using Natural Chinese Clinoptilolite. Sep. Purif Technol. 2005, 44, 229-234.
24. Wang Y., Liu S., Xu Z., Han T., Chaun S., Zhu T. Ammonia Removal from Leachate Solution using Natural Chinese Clinoptilolite. J. Hazard. Mater. B. 2006, 136, 735-740.
25. Karadag D., Koc Y., Turan M., Armagan A. Removal of Ammonium Ion from Aqueous Solution using NaturalTurkish Clinoptilolite. J. Hazard. Mater. B. 2006, 136, 604-609.
26. Hankins N.P., Pliankarom S., Hilal N. Removal of NH4+ Ion from NH4Cl Solution using Clinoptilolite: an Equilibrium Ion Exchange Study on the Removal of NH4+ Ion from Aqueous Effluent using Clinoptilolite. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2004, 39(15), 3639-3663.
27. Lewis R.J. Hawley’s Condensed Chemical Dictionary. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York. 2002, 1223 p.
28. Hedstrom A. Ion Exchange of Ammonium in Zeolites: a Literature Review. J. Environ. Eng. 2001, 673-681.
29. Koon H.J., Kaufmann W.J. Ammonia Removal from Municipal Wastewaters by Ion Exchange. J. WPCF 1975, 47(3), 448-465.
30. Hankins N.P., Pliankarom S., Hilal N. Removal of NH4+ Ion from NH4Cl Solution using Clinoptilolite: an Equilibrium Ion Exchange Study on the Removal of NH4+ Ion from Aqueous Effluent using Clinoptilolite. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2004, 39(15), 3639-3663.
109
31. Lancia A., Musmarra D., Pepe F., Volpicelli G. Adsorption of Mercuric Chloride Vapors from Incinerator Flue Gases on Calcium Hydroxide Particles. Combustion Science and Technology. 1993, 93, 277-289.
32. Lancia A., Karatza D., Musmarra D., Pepe F. Adsorption of Mercuric Chloride from Simulated Incinerator Exhaust Gas by Means of Sorbalit TM Particles. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 1996, 29(6), 939-946.
33. Langmuir I. The Adsorption of Gases on Plane Surfaces of Glass, Mica and PlatinumJ. Am. Chem. Soc., 1918,40,1361-1403.
34. Freundlich H. Contribution a l'etude de la validite de differents modeles utilises lors de l'adsorption de solute sur cherbon actif. Z. Physik. Chem. 1906, 57, 385-471.
35. Ayari F., Srasra E., Trabelsi-Ayadi M. Retention of Lead from an Aqueous Solution by use of Bentonite as Adsorbent for Reducing Leaching from Industrial Effluents. Journal of Desalination. 2007, 206, 270-278.
Received 24.05.11 Accepted 29.11.11
Реферат
Рассматриваются возможности глинистых минералов (на примере бентонита) со структурной формулой Ca0i0i4Na0i404K0ji6(Si7> 65Al0j35)(Al2j9i0Fe0> 762Mg0>376)O22> в качестве ионообменной среды для очистки от аммиака водостоков. Была проведена серия экспериментов, которая выявила, что бентонит является высокоселективным сорбентом для ионов аммония. Данные экспериментов также показали, что 94% аммиака удаляется из водных растворов, по сравнению с его исходной концентрацией, при средней общей ионообменной способности среды ~ 50 мгэкв/100 гр. Эксперименты проводились в различных условиях для определения влияния времени контакта, pH раствора, его концентрации и температуры на эффективность и пропускную способность среды для использования в указанных целях. Детальный анализ экспериментальных данных указывает на то, что повышение концентрации раствора и увеличение времени контакта обеспечивают наилучшую эффективность, при оптимальном pH от 6 до 8. Адсорбционная способность варьировала между 34 и 48 мгэкв/100 гр, при повышении температуры от 20 до 40°C, Таким образом, очистка от аммония контролировалась, по сути, эндотермическим процессом, основанным на химической адсорбции (хемосорбции). Изотермы Ленгмюра и Фрейндлиха применялись для данных всей серии экспериментов. По заключению авторов этой статьи, изотерма Фрейндлиха наиболее полно соответствует полученным данным, на что указывает на более удовлетворительное значение коэффициента корреляции: (0,97 и 0,45, соответственно).
110
