CC BY
3
Keynesians view the money supply as an endogenous variable, which depends on the policy of the monetary authorities and the level of economic activity. «Inflation of costs» is interpreted as the result of several factors. The main one is considered to be an increase in wages above the level corresponding to the growth of labor productivity. Although, according to Keynes, «full or ... approximately full employment is a rare and quick-passing event.»
The level of employment is determined by Keynes by the point of intersection of the functions of aggregate demand and aggregate supply. It is at this point that the expected profit by entrepreneurs will be the greatest. In advocating the conscious management of monetary circulation, Keynes considered it necessary to use various kinds of measures only with part-time employment. He warned against using monetary leverage in conditions of full employment, believing that in this case they could cause unrestrained inflation.
Used sources:
1. Management of the organization / Ed. AGPorshneva, Z.P. Rumyantseva, N.A. Salomatin. - Moscow: Infra - M, 1999.
2. Fundamentals of commercialization of the results of NPOKR and technology / Comp. N.M. Fresheret. M .: ANH, 1999.
3. Сохадалиев А. М. СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ И ПРАВОВЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ РАЗВИТИЯ ЭКОНОМИКУ УЗБЕКИСТАНА //Экономика и социум. - 2017. - №. 4. - С. 1301-1304.
4. Умарова Г. Ш. Роль иностранных инвестиций в развитии национальной экономики //International scientific journal. - 2016. - №. 3. - С. 148-149.
УДК 796.02
Xakimov D.A.
The teacher of the department«Social science» Namangan Engineering Construction Institute
Uzbekistan, Namangan city THE ROLE OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE LIFE SOCIETY
Аннотация: В этой статье обсуждается роль философии в обществе Ключевые слова: философия, наука, образование Abstract: This article discusses the role of philosophy in society Keywords: philosophy, science, education
In Ancient Hellas, philosophy was considered a pedestal and at the same time the pinnacle of science. Since then, two and a half thousand years have passed. How can you assess the relationship of philosophy and science in our time?
It would seem that by the essential and formal confessions, everything is clear. Philosophy is a theoretical knowledge, and it has always been and remains a product of science. In different countries, scientists are traditionally awarded degrees in the field of philosophical sciences; philosophers work in the system of Academies of Sciences, universities and institutes, where their subject is one of
the obligatory sciences in the lists approved by official state instances. And nevertheless the problem "philosophy and science" remains.26
It seems that in the strict sense of the word, philosophy has never (neither in the past, nor now) been and is not a science. This applies primarily to such basic attributes of philosophy and science as subject, theory and method. The subject area, theory and method of philosophy are incommensurable and incomparable with what is characteristic of any sciences (there were hundreds in the 20th century): natural, social or technical.
Even the most highly developed science (for example, modern physics), which has a powerful theoretical potential, including many relatively independent sciences (solid-state physics, liquid, gas, plasma, astrophysics, etc.) even being fundamental remains private science. Its subject is a specific area of reality, part, sector, fragment of being. Accordingly, the own theory of this science and the method of researching a part of nature, society, or human characteristics, its vital activity, can be characterized.27
Philosophy by its very nature does not know such limitations. To put philosophy on a par with the fundamental sciences (not to mention the many special and applied sciences) would mean abolishing it by dissolving it in the vast bulk of human knowledge. And in this there is no claim of philosophy to panlogism (group pan - everything and logos - concept, thought, reason). It does not include all the information obtained by conceptual thinking; does not accumulate all the achievements of the human mind; does not embrace all reasonable activity. But Logos can not manifest himself outside philosophy. Otherwise people would lose at least a conscious understanding of what vast and contradictory world they live in and what their ideals, their own vocation and the meaning of existence are. 28
However, the relationship between philosophy and science is by no means reduced to a formal determination of their differences. They have much in common, you can not build a kind of "Chinese wall" between them: the general and the particular closely intertwine, supplementing and simultaneously denying one another.
Indeed, the common in philosophy and science is the study of laws, although they are not identical in their generality, object and objectness. Philosophy, like science, has a categorical and conceptual apparatus with inherent characteristic features.29 They are united also by a common desire to comprehend the truth, however, philosophy contains not only knowledge received as a result of
26 Ёкубжанова Х. Ё., Байтураев О. У., Умарова Г. Ш. Проблемы привлечения инвестиций в экотуризм //Молодой ученый. - 2016. - №. 4. - С. 327-329.
27 Хакимов А. А., Хакимов Д. А. THE PLACE OF THE THEORY OF THE STATE AND THE RIGHT IN THE SYSTEM OF SCIENCES //Теория и практика современной науки. - 2017. - №. 5. - С. 1258-1260.
28 Шайдуллаев Н. ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ В ОТКРЫТЫХ ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫХ СИСТЕМАХ //Теория и практика современной науки. - 2017. - №. 4. - С. 909-912.
29 Mamajonova G. K., Inomxo'jayeva S. M. ABU REIKHAN BERUNIY-PROMINENT FIGURES OF UZBEKISTAN //Экономика и социум. - 2017. - №. 4. - С. 24-26.
knowledge of reality, but also the attitude towards it, the corresponding (including moral) assessment of knowledge. Significantly different ways, means, methods of philosophical, and scientific verification (Latin verus - true and facere - do), ie, verification of the validity of theoretical positions, the establishment of their authenticity by empirical means with the help of certain criteria.
Philosophy, like science, is one of the forms of social consciousness. It uses rational; a way of cognizing the world, follows the general principles and norms of its theoretical assimilation. However, philosophy is not only carefully logically built academic knowledge and the fruit of rational activity; the result of philosophizing always bears the stamp of the individuality of his creator, which brings philosophy and art together.
As a generalized and systematized theoretical analogue of reality, philosophy, like science, has a certain structure, which includes logic, which formulates laws and principles for obtaining any inferential knowledge. This structure, possessing a number of general scientific features, simultaneously has a special general-theoretical and methodological character. By analogy with science, philosophy is a relatively independent social institution with its own scientific institutions (institutes, departments, departments, laboratories), the means of scientific research and the staff of scientists.
Forming a world view, philosophy acts as its leading historical type, while the sciences, together taken, participate in this process. Consequently, here both the general and the specific in the nature of philosophy and science are manifested. The same applies to their other characteristics. Thus, the history of philosophy and science is an endless process of development and mutual enrichment, but the science is more historically determined (Latin determinare - to determine), it is often situational and progressively, predominantly, linearly.
Used sources:
1. Gornshtein TN Dialectical method / Chapter Four // Philosophy of Nikolai Hartman. (Critical analysis of the main problems of ontology). - Leningrad: "Science", 1969.
2. Evarist Sanchez-Palencia. Dialectical walk in science. 2012
3. Culturology. XX century. Anthology. - M .: Lawyer, 1995.
4. Хакимов А. А., Хакимов Д. А. THE PLACE OF THE THEORY OF THE STATE AND THE RIGHT IN THE SYSTEM OF SCIENCES //Теория и практика современной науки. - 2017. - №. 5. - С. 1258-1260.
5. Mamajonova G. K., Inomxo'jayeva S. M. ABU REIKHAN BERUNIY-PROMINENT FIGURES OF UZBEKISTAN //Экономика и социум. - 2017. -№. 4. - С. 24-26.
6. Шайдуллаев Н. ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ ИНФОРМАЦИОННО-ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ В ОТКРЫТЫХ ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫХ СИСТЕМАХ //Теория и практика современной науки. - 2017. - №. 4. - С. 909-912
7. Ёкубжанова Х. Ё., Байтураев О. У., Умарова Г. Ш. Проблемы привлечения инвестиций в экотуризм //Молодой ученый. - 2016. - №. 4. - С. 327-329.
