Clinical researches
UDC: 579: 616.9: 612.017
SENSITIVITY TO ANTIBIOTICS AMONG STRAINS OF SALMONELLA CURRENT, WHICH CIRCULATES IN THE PAST 10 YEARS IN UKRAINE
V. O. Bubalo
L. V. Gromashevskiy Institute of Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases of Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv)
In this article the main results of the sensitivity to antibiotics on S. Typhimurium, S. strains of Salmonella Enteritidis and rare groups that circulate in Ukraine last 10 years were described. The unifying disc-fusion method determined the sensitivity of Salmonella strains to several antibiotics. Resistance to antibiotics of strains of Salmonella was caused by the lack of effective influence of drugs on salmonellosis. The obtained results revealed antibiotics with a strong antimicrobial action and a narrow focus on strains of Salmonella.
KEY WORDS: salmonellosis, S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, rare Salmonella strains, antibiotics
ЧУТЛИВІСТЬ ДО АНТИБІОТИКІВ СЕРЕД АКТУАЛЬНИХ ШТАМІВ САЛЬМОНЕЛ,
ЩО ЦИРКУЛЮЮТЬ НА ТЕРИТОРІЇ УКРАЇНИ ОСТАННІ 10 РОКІВ
В. О. Бубало
Інститут епідеміології та інфекційних хвороб ім. Л. В. Громашевського АМН України (Київ)
У статті визначені основні результати дослідження на чутливість до антибіотиків щодо S. Typhimurium, S. enteritidis та штамів сальмонел рідких груп, що циркулюють на території України останні 10 років. За уніфікованим дискодифузійним методом була визначена чутливість штамів сальмонел до ряду антибіотиків. Резистентність штамів сальмонели до антибіотиків була викликана відсутністю ефективного впливу ліків на сальмонельоз. Отримаю результати дозволили виявити антибіотики з вираженою протимікробною дією і вузькою спрямованістю на штами сальмонели.
КЛЮЧОВІ СЛОВА: сальмонельоз, S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, штами сальмонел рідких груп, антибіотики
ЧУВСТВИТЕЛЬНОСТЬ К АНТИБИОТИКАМ СРЕДИ АКТУАЛЬНЫХ ШТАММОВ САЛЬМОНЕЛЛ, ЦИРКУЛИРУЮЩИХ НА ТЕРРИТОРИИ УКРАИНЫ ПОСЛЕДНИЕ 10 ЛЕТ
В. А. Бубало
Институт эпидемиологии и инфекционных болезней им. Л. В. Громашевского АМН Украины (Киев)
В статье определены основные результаты исследования на чувствительность к антибиотикам по S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis и штаммов сальмонелл редких групп, циркулирующих на территории Украины последние 10 лет. Унифицированным дискодифузийним методом была определена чувствительность штаммов сальмонелл к ряду антибиотиков. Резистентность штаммов сальмонеллы к антибиотикам была вызвана отсутствием эффективного воздействия лекарств на сальмонеллез. Полученные результаты позволили выявить антибиотики с выраженной противомикробным действием и узкой направленностью на штаммы сальмонеллы.
КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: сальмонеллез, S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, штаммы сальмонелл редких групп, антибиотики
© Bubalo V. O., 2013
INTRODUCTION
The frequency of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria increases among the population of the world [1-3], causing these infections are becoming animportant healthcare problem [4-6]. Incorrect use of antibiotics is developing resistance to these drugs [7-9].
Application of antibiotics in farm animals allows persistent bacteria and genes of resistance be transferred through the food chain from animals to humans [10-13]. The failured treatment leads to a rise in the mortality rate, as well as to the necessity to develop new antibiotics [14-16].
RELEVANCE
At present the problem of sensitivity to antibiotics diseases is relevant to public health: each year in the European Union, more than 25,000 people die from infections caused by resistant bacteria [17, 18]. The use of
antibiotics has led to the formation and spread of resistance to these drugs, which are associated with a decrease in the effectiveness of treatment and, therefore, more difficult and long duration of disease, increased frequency of hospitalization, increase the number of deaths and an increase in economic losses to society [19-21]. Microbial resistance to antibacterial agents is characterized by retention of their ability to multiply in the presence of concentrations of these substances which are administered at therapeutic doses [22-24].
The problem of stability of Salmonella to antibiotics was exacerbated in 1972, when many countries have experienced outbreaks of infections caused by S. typhi, resistant to chloramphenicol, sulfonamide, tetracycline and streptomycin, whereas ampicillin and cotrimoxazole retain activity.
After twenty years, most of the strains were resistant and so microbial agents, wherein the allocation of multidrug resistant S. typhi has become commonplace [25-27].
According to WHO, the use of fluoroquinolones in animal’s food has led to the emergence of an appropriate antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter in Salmonella that cause infectious disease in humans. In diseases, caused by multi-drug resistant strains of Salmonella Typhimurium phage type specific (DT) 104 resistance to quinolones, observed treatment failure, a higher rate of hospitalization and higher risk of death [17].
Thus, resistance to antibiotics in infections has become a growing international public health problem that requires urgent attention [28-30].
The aim is to determine the sensitivity to antibiotics of current Salmonella strains circulating in Ukraine last 10 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To investigate the biological properties of Salmonella used 136 strains during the period 1996-2012 years, obtained from the Museum of pathogenic microbial organism «L.V. Gromashevskiy Institute of Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases of Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine».
Of the 62 strains of Salmonella period 1996-2006, 24 (38 %) belonged to
S. typhimurium, 38 (62 %) - to S. enteritidis, with 57 of museum culture period 2006-2012 7 (12 %) belonged to S. typhimurium, 50 (88 %)
- to S. enteritidis, also for better comparison Sal-monella sampling of rare groups was formed which were isolated from the external environment in the S. java - 7 strains, S. derby
- 1 strain, S. colorado - 1 strain, S. infantis -1 strain, S. blegdam - 2 strain, S. montevideo -
1 strain, S. senftenberg -1 strain of S. haifa -
2 strain.
The study of antibiotic sensitivity was performed using a standardized Kirby Bauer Disk Diffusion Method. Getting results of diffusion in Mueller-Hinton agar was performed using paper discs and a special measuring stick that served to account for the fields of growth retardation [31]. The results are interpreted on the basis of criteria of CLSI (2010) growth inhibition zone diameter in millimeters of culture (tab. 1) and the disc manufacturer.
Depending on the diameter of growth inhibition zones around the disks were classified as resistant strains (resistant), moderately sensitive and stable. Strain of E. Coli ATCC 25922 was used as a reference and for the control; it was obtained from the Museum of pathogenic microbial organism SI «L.V. Gromashevskiy Institute of Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases of Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine».
Received results were treated by quantitative methods of mathematical statistics including standard deviation of sample values (M) and the mean error (m). The significance
Table 1
Standard interpretation of the results (limiting values of diameters of zones of growth delay)
Antibiotic name Content antibiotic in disk, mcg The diameters of zones of growth inhibition, mm
stable moderately resistant sensitive
Ampicillin 10 13 14-16 17
Gentamicin 10 12 13-14 15
Kanamycin 30 13 14-17 18
Co-trimoxazole 1,25/23,75 10 11-15 16
Nitrofurantoin 300 14 15 17
Polymyxin-B 300 11 - 12
Streptomycin 10 11 12-14 15
Sulfamethizole 300 11 12-14 15
Tetracycline 30 14 15-18 19
Ticarcillin 75 14 15-19 20
Chloramphenicol 30 12 13-17 18
Cefazolin 30 14 15-17 18
Cefoxitin 30 14 15-17 18
Cefotaxime 30 14 15-22 23
Ceftriaxone 30 13 14-20 21
Cefuroxime 30 14 15-17 18
Ciprofloxacin 5 15 16-20 21
of differences was determined using indicators Student t-test, which is defined by a table of critical points of distribution. The correlation coefficient was considered with the error probability p < 0.05, which was determined by comparison with the critical value from the table depending on the size of the study group, the correlation coefficients and the likelihood of errors. The data were processed using a personal computer and software for processing and analysis of statistical information «Excel 2003», included in the package «Microsoft Office 2003».
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Evaluation of the distribution of sensitivity to antibiotics showed that in 1996-2005, strains of S. Typhimurium were highly sensitive to polymyxin-B (100 %), cefoxitin (87,5 %), ciprofloxacin (83,33 %), cefotaxime and
gentamicin (at 70,83 %), cefazolin (66,67 %), and ampicillin cefotaxime (by 62,5 %), nitrofurantoin and streptomycin (58,33 %). The most resistant strains were to sulfamethizole (83,33 %), cotrimoxazole (75,0 %), kanamycin (58,33 %), tetracycline (50,0 %).
The results of sensitivity to antibiotic resistant strains of S. Typhimurium 2006-2012
years showed significantly decreased sensitivity of cefoxitin and ceftriaxone, respectively, 73,21 and 42,26 %, tetracycline -by 31,54 %. It should be noted that strains of S. Typhimurium remained absolute sensitivity (100 %) to polymyxin-B during the whole investigated period - 1996-2012. It was found that a semisynthetic broad-spectrum penicillin
- ampicillin increased its activity on 23,21 %, with a simultaneous decrease of the same level of stability during the study during the period from 1996-2005, 2006-2012 years. Among the newest synthetic antibiotic quinolones ciprofloxacin stands, the sensitivity of which was in 1996-2005, 83.33 %, and in 2006-2012 declined slightly - by 11.9 %.
Summarizing the results for the group of cephalosporins, it should be noted that almost all the members of this class, except cefazolin, lowered resistance at 2005-2012 with 19962005 years moderately resistant (tab. 2).
The obtained result of the distribution of sensitivity to antibiotics revealed that in 19962005 strains of S. Enteritidis were 100 % sensitive to polymyxin-B throughout the study from 1996 to 2012. High sensitivity was found in ampicillin (94,74 %). In 1996-2005, strains of S. enteritidis in the majority had a high
Resistance to antibiotics of S. typhimurium strains
Table 2
Antibiotic name Distribution of sensitivity to antibiotics (M ± m), %
Strains 1996-2005 years (n = 24) Strains 2006-2012 years (n = 7)
stable moder ately sensitive stable moderatel y resistant sensitive
Ampicillin 37,50 ± 9,88 0 62,50 ± 9,88 14,29 ± 13,23 0 85,71 ± 13,23
Gentamicin 4,17 ± 4,08 25,00 ± 8,84 70,83 ± 9,28 0 42,86 ± 18,70 57,14 ± 18,70
Kanamycin 58,33 ± 10,06 8,33 ± 5,64 33,33 ± 9,62 28,57 ± 17,07 0 71,43 ± 17,07
Co-trimoxazole 75,00 ± 8 84*** 0 25,00 ± 8,84* 28,57 ± 17 07*** 0 71,43 ± 17,07*
Nitrofurantoin 12,50 ± 6,75 29,17 ± 9,28 58,33 ± 10,06 28,57 ± 17,07 14,29 ± 13,23 57,14 ± 18,70
Polymyxin-B 0 0 100 0 0 100
Streptomycin 16,67 ± 7,61 25,00 ± 8,84 58,33 ± 10,06 14,29 ± 13,23 28,57 ± 17,07 57,14 ± 18,70
Sulfamethizole 83,33 ± 7 61*** 0 16,67 ± 7,61* 28,57 ± 17 07*** 0 71,43 ± 17,07*
Tetracycline 50,00 ± 10,21*** 4,17 ± 4,08** 45,83 ± 10,17 14,29 ± 13,23*** 71,43 ± 17,07** 14,29 ± 13,23
Ticarcillin 41,67 ± 10,06 37,50 ± 9,88 20,83 ± 8,29 14,29 ± 13,23 42,86 ± 18,70 42,86 ± 18,70
Chloramphenicol 37,50± 9,88 8,33 ± 5,64 54,17 ± 10,17 14,29 ± 13,23 0 85,71 ± 13,23
Cefazolin 12,50 ± 6,75 20,83 ± 8,29** 66,67 ± 9,62 14,29 ± 13,23 0 85,71 ± 13,23
Cefoxitin 0 12,50 ± 6,75** 87,50 ± 6,75* 0 85,71 ± 13,23** 14,29 ± 13,23*
Cefotaxime 12,50 ± 6,75 16,67 ± 7,61** 70,83 ± 9,28* 14,29 ± 13,23 57,14 ± 18,70** 28,57 ± 17,07*
Ceftriaxone 20,83 ± 8,29 16,67 ± 7,61 62,50 ± 9,88 14,29 ± 13,23 28,57 ± 17,07 57,14 ± 18,70
Cefuroxime 29,17 ± 9,28 37,50 ± 9,88 33,33 ± 9,62 14,29 ± 13,23 71,43 ± 17,07 14,29 ± 13,23
Ciprofloxacin 0 16,67 ± 7,61 83,33 ± 7,61 0 28,57 ± 17,07 71,43 ± 17,07
Note:
* - the difference in the percentage of resistant strains is likely,
** - the difference in the percentage of resistant strains conditionally probable, *** - the difference in the percentage of susceptible strains is likely
sensitivity to the representatives of the cephalosporin group: ciprofloxacin - 94,74 %, cefoxitin - 89,47 %, cefotaxime - 78,95 %, ceftriaxone - 73,68 %, cefazolin - 68,42 %. The less sensitivity strains to cefuroxime (50,0 %) had. Low sensitivity, also, was noted in the combined antibiotic co-trimoxazole (52,63 %). High sensitivity was observed in a number of aminoglycosides - gentamicin (84,21 %), kanamycin (78,95 %), streptomycin (94,74 %). Different sensitivity was noted in the representatives of penicillin: in
ampicillin - 94,74 % and ticarcillin - 39,47 %. The results of the period 2006-2012 years
showed that from 18 tested antibiotics, strains S. enteritidis increased 100 % susceptibility to
11 antibiotics. Special attention deserves a slight increase in sensitivity to the cephalosporin group of strains (tab. 3). Sensitivity of the antibiotic-resistant strains of Salmonella rare groups compared with S. enteritidis 2006-2012 showed that 100 % of the sensitivity of the strains had 61,11 % of the investigated antibiotics. The most sensitive antibiotics for the period 1996-2012 years were: ampicillin, aminoglycosides (gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin), combined antibiotics (cotrimoxazole, polymyxin-B),
a synthetic broad-spectrum antibiotic - absolute sensitivity from the number of
chloramphenicol, an antibiotic synthesized new cephalosporins (tab. 4).
quinolones - ciprofloxacin. Cefazolin had the
Table 3
Resistance to antibiotics of S. Enteritidis strains
Antibiotic name Distribution of sensitivity to antibiotics (M ± m), %
Strains 1996-2005 years (n = 24) Strains 2006-2012 years (n = 7)
stable moderately resistant sensitiv e stable moderately resistant sensitive
Ampicillin 0 5,26 ± 3,62 94,74 ± 3,62 0 0 100,00
Gentamicin 0 15,79 ± 5,92** 84,21 ± 5 92*** 0 0** 100,00***
Kanamycin 10,53 ± 4,98* 10,53 ± 4,98** 78,95 ± 6,61*** 0* 0** 100,00***
Co-trimoxazole 39,47 ± 7,93* 7,89 ± 4,37 52,63 ± 8,10*** 0* 0 100,00***
Nitrofurantoin 0* 21,05 ± 6,61** 78,95 ± 6,61*** 10,00 ± 4,87* 44,00 ± 8,05** 46,00 ± 8,09***
Polymyxin-B 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
Streptomycin 0 5,26 ± 3,62 94,74 ± 3,62 0 0 100,00
Sulfamethizole 55,26 ± 8,07* 2,63 ± 2,60 42,11 ± 8,01*** 0* 0 100,00***
Tetracycline 2,63 ± 2,60 28,95 ± 7,36** 5, 2 ± * rr 0 54,00 ± 8,09** 46,00 ± 8,09***
Ticarcillin 2,63 ± 2,60 57,89 ± 8,01 39,47 ± 7,93 0 46,00 ± 8,09 54,00 ± 8,09
Chloramphenicol 7,89 ± 4,37 15,79 ± 5,92** 76,32 ± 6,90*** 0 0** 100,00***
Cefazolin 10,53 ± 4,98* 21,05 ± 6,61** 5, 2 ± * rr 0* 0** 100,00***
Cefoxitin 0 10,53 ± 4,98 89,47 ± 4,98 0 22,00 ± 6,72 78,00 ± 6,72
Cefotaxime 0 21,05 ± 6,61 78,95 ± 6,61 0 16,00 ± 5,95 84,00 ± 5,95
Ceftriaxone 5,26 ± 3,62 21,05 ± 6,61 73,68 ± 714*** 0 8,00 ± 4,40 92,00 ± 4 40***
Cefuroxime 13,16 ± 5,48* 36,84 ± 7,83 50,00 ± 8,11 0* 44,00 ± 8,05 56,00 ± 8,05
Ciprofloxacin 5,26 ± 3,62 0 94,74 ± 3,62 0 0 100,00
Note:
* - the difference in the percentage of resistant strains is likely,
** - the difference in the percentage of resistant strains conditionally probable, *** - the difference in the percentage of susceptible strains is likely
For the treatment of Salmonella strains of S. typhimurium chloramphenicol, cotrimo-xazole, and - ticarcillin, ampicillin, aminoglycosides, cefazolin, kanamycin, sulfame-thizole are the broad-spectrum antibiotics. The resistant strains of S. typhimurium resistant to cephalosporins II and III generation, which are representatives of penicillin antibiotics group, can prevent that these strains produce betalactamase extended spectrum that can lead to future failure treating such patients by penicillins, cephalosporins I-IV and other generations of antibacterial drugs.
In this noteworthy that strains of S. typhimurium and S. enteritidis are mostly sensitive to cephalosporins, quinolones, fluoroquinolone and polymyxin. The drug nitrofuran series (nitrofurantoin), penicillin (tetracycline, ticarcillin) and cephalosporin antibiotic II generation - cefuroxime lost their effectiveness against S. typhimurium,
S. enteritidis and Salmonella strains of rare groups. In most cases, antibiotic sensitivity was higher in rare strains of groups.
A characteristic feature of the use of antibiotics in patients with salmonellosis is that during the study period 1996-2005, regardless
of the type strain, the only 100% efficiency has influence on the integrity of the cytoplasmic
been achieved in the treatment of polymyxin B, membrane of microbial cells and its high
due, apparently, to its specific mechanism of toxicity to it.
Table 4
Antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella strains of rare groups
Antibiotic name Distribution of sensitivity to antibiotics (M ± m), %
Strains 1996-2005 years (n = 17) Strains 2006-2012 years (n = 50)
stable moderately resistant sensitiv e stable moderately resistant sensitive
Ampicillin 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
Gentamicin 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
Kanamycin 0 17,65 ± 9,25 82,35 ± 9,25 0 0 100,00
Co-trimoxazole 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
Nitrofurantoin 52,94 ± 12,11 11,76 ± 7,81 35,29 ± 11,59 10,00 ± 4,87 44,00 ± 8,05 46,00 ± 8,09
Polymyxin-B 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
Streptomycin 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
Sulfamethizole 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
Tetracycline 52,94 ± 12,11 47,06 ± 12,11 0 0 54,00 ± 8,09 46,00 ± 8,09
Ticarcillin 17,65 ± 9,25 35,29 ± 11,59 47,06 ± 12,11 0 46,00 ± 8,09 54,00 ± 8,09
Chloramphenicol 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
Cefazolin 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
Cefoxitin 0 29,41 ± 11,05 70,59 ± 11,05 0 22,00 ± 6,72 78,00 ± 6,72
Cefotaxime 0 17,65 ± 9,25 82,35 ± 9,25 0 16,005,95 84,00 ± 5,95
Ceftriaxone 0 0 100,00 0 8,00 ± 4,40 92,00 ± 4,40
Cefuroxime 0 52,94 ± 12,11 47,06 ± 12,11 0 44,00 ± 8,05 56,00 ± 8,05
Ciprofloxacin 0 0 100,00 0 0 100,00
CONCLUSIONS
The problem of rational use of antibiotics in the treatment of salmonellosis is among the most urgent in medicine. Strains of S. typhimurium, S. enteritidis react to cephalosporins, quinolones, fluoroquinolones. Nitrofurans, most penicillins and cefuroxime reduced their activity against S. typhimurium, S. enteritidis and Salmonella strains of rare groups. Strains of rare groups were more susceptible to antibiotics. The only current effective drug in all tested strains of Salmonella was polymyxin B.
The increase in resistance of Salmonella strains against a background of resistance to the formation of new genes produced by the
microbial cells that neutralize the effect of antibiotics on their cell system. The development of resistant strains of microorganisms greatly reduces the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy.
PERSPECTIVES OF FURTHER INVESTIGAT
The development of resistance strains of Salmonella bacteria is a natural reaction, which can be controlled through the proper use of antibiotics. Advanced developments overcome resistance to antibiotics salmonellosis is to introduce the practice of rational antibiotic regimens, obtaining new types of antibiotics on the basis of known, the use of antibiotics with different mechanisms of action. For the final
solution of this problem it is expedient further strains of salmonella in the current economic
research aimed at clarifying the strengths of a and social terms.
number of modern antibiotics against different
REFERENCES
1. Duggan S. Salmonella in meats, water, fruit and vegetables as disclosed from testing undertaken by Food Business Operators in Ireland from 2005 to 2009 / S. Duggan, E. Jordan, M. Gutierrez et al. // Ir. Vet. J. -2012. Vol. 65(1). - P. 17.
2. Falkenhorst G. Serological cross-sectional studies on salmonella incidence in eight European countries: no correlation with incidence of reported cases // G. Falkenhorst, J. Simonsen, T.H. Ceper et al. // BMC Public Health. - 2012. - Vol. 12. - P. 523.
3. Gu rakan G.C. Differentiation of salmonella typhimurium from salmonella enteritidis and other salmonella serotypes using random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis / GC Gu rakan, C. Aksoy et al. // J. Poult. Sci. - 2008. - Vol. 87. - P. 1068-1074.
4. Lindsay E.A. Molecular characterization of a multiresistent strain of Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium DT204b responsible for an international outbreak of salmonellosis: importance of electronic exchange of gel data for outbreak investigations / EA Lindsay, A.J. Lawson, R.A. Walker et al. // Emerg. Infect. Dis. - 2002. - №8. - S. 732-734.
5. Lunguya O. Antimicrobial Resistance in Invasive Non-typhoid Salmonella from the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Emergence of Decreased Fluoroquinolone Susceptibility and Extended-spectrum Beta Lactamases // O. Lunguya, V. Lejon, M.-F. Phoba // PLoS Negl Trop Dis. - 2013. Vol. 7(3). - P. e2103.
6. Nicolay N. Completeness and timeliness of Salmonella notifications in Ireland in 2008: a cross sectional study / N. Nicolay, P. Garvey, N. Delappe et al. // BMC Public Health. - 2010. - Vol. 10. - P. 568.
7. Gal'kevich N.V. Antibakterial'naya terapiya sal'monelleza na sovremennom etape / N.V. Gal'kevich, O.V. Strinkevich, N.L. Klyuyko, A.V. Lazarev, S.F. Kretova // Retsept. - 2010. - № 5 (73). - C. 61-64.
8. Ivanov A.S. Sovremennyye predstavleniya ob antibiotikorezistentnosti i antibakterial'noy terapii sal'monellezov / A.S. Ivanov // Klin. Mikrobiol. Antimikrob. Khimioter. - 2009. - T. 11. - № 4. - S. 305326.
9. Cherepakhina I.YA. Monitoring antibotikorezistentnosti enterobakteriy, provodimyy v ramkakh programmy protivodeystviya bioterrorizmu / I.YA. Cherepakhina, V.V. Balakhnova, O.S. Burlakova i dr. // Sovremennyye naukoyemkiye tekhnologii. - 2007. - №2. - S. 18-23.
10. Kosenko I.M. Antibakterial'naya terapiya - real'nost' i perspektivy / I.M. Kosenko // Terra medica. - 2008.
- № 3 (23).
11. Tapal'skiy D.V. Problemy ustoychivosti sal'monell k klinicheski znachimym antibakterial'nym preparatam / D.V. Tapal'skiy, V.A. Osipov, S.V. Zhavoronok // Problemy zdorov'ya i ekologii. - 2005. - №1 (3). - El. resurs: htpp: // emedicine.medscape.com/article/
12. Addis Z. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from lactating cows and in contact humans in dairy farms of Addis Ababa: a cross sectional study / Z. Addis, N. Kebede, Z. Worku et al. // BMC Infect Dis. - 2011. - Vol. 11. - P. 222.
13. Ogawa M. The versatility of Shigella effectors / M. Ogawa, Y. Handa, H. Ashida et al. // Nature Reviews Microbiology. - 2008. - Vol. 6 (1). - P. 11-16.
14. Barat S. Extensive In Vivo Resilience of Persistent Salmonella / S. Barat, B. Steeb, A. Maze, D. Bumann // PLoS One. - 2012. Vol. 7(7). - P. e42007.
15. Michael D. Differential Diagnoses Workup/ Salmonella Infections.Treatment and Medication / D. Michael D. Owens, Dirk A.Warren / Ma 20, 2010. - El. resurs: htpp: //emedicine.medscape.com/article/785774-diagnosis.
16. Sanada T. The Shigella flexneri effector OspI deamidates UBC13 to dampen the inflammatory response / T. Sanada, M. Kim, H. Mimuro et al. // Nature. - 2012. - Vol. 483 (7391). - P. 623-626.
17. Bor'ba s ustoychivost'yu k antibiotikam s pozitsiy bezopasnosti pishchevykh produktov v Evrope, WHO, 2011 http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/144695/e94889R.pdf
18. National Salmonella Reference Laboratory of Ireland. Annual Report,
2008.http://www.fsai.ie/uploadedFiles/News_Centre/News/NSRL_Report_2008.pdf.
19. Kar A. Characterization, classification and taxonomy of microbes in Pharmaceutical Microbilogy. - New Age International Ltd., Publishers. New Delhi, 2008. - P. 62-111.
20. Klotchko A. Salmonellosis. Salmonellosy-Treatment and education / A. Klotchko, M.R. Wallace. Mar 31,
2009. - El. resurs: htpp: // emedlcine.medscape.com/article/228174-overview.
21. Liasi S.A. Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic sensitivity of three isolates of lactic acid bacteria from fermented fish product / SA Liasi, T.I. Azmi, M.D. Hassan et al. // Budu. Malaysian J. - Microbiol. -
2009. - Vol. 5. - P. 33-37.
22. Kudin A.P. Infektsionnyye diarei u detey: posobiye / A.P. Kudin, G.M. Lagir. - Minsk: Sheyko A.I., 2009.
- 80 s.
23. Lobzin YU.V. Etiotropnaya terapiya kishechnykh infektsiy / YU.V. Lobzin, S.M. Zakharenko // Infektsionnyye bolezni. - 2009. - T. 7. - №3. - S. 62-67.
24. Fluyer F.S. Enterotoksigennost' sal'monell, vydelennykh ot bol'nykh detey na sovremennom etape / F.S. Fluyer, YU.A. Zotova, L.N. Milyutina // Infektsionnyye bolezni. - 2007. - T. 5. - №4. - S. 41-44.
25. Parry C.M. Typhoid fever / C.M. Parry, T.T. Hien, G. Dougan et al. // N. Eng. J. Med. - 2002. - Vol. 347.
- P. 1770-82.
26. Pegues D.A. Salmonella species, including Salmonella typhi. Principles and practice of infectious diseases / DA Pegues, M.E. Ohl, S.I. Miller. - Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livigstone, 2005. - P. 2636-54.
27. Barco L. A Rapid and Sensitive Method to Identify and Differentiate Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium and Salmonella enterica Serotype by Combining Traditional Serotyping and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction / L. Barco, A.A. Lettini, E. Ramon et al. // Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011. -Vol. 8(6). - P. 741-743.
28. Sovremennyye klinicheskiye rekomendatsii po antimikrobnoy terapii / Mezhregional'naya assotsiatsiya po klinicheskoy mikrobiologii i antimikrobnoy khimioterapii. Vypusk 2, Smolensk. - M.: MAKMAKH, 2007. - 608 s.
29. Hendriksen R.S. Characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates recovered from blood and stool specimens in Thailand // RS Hendriksen, E. Hyytia-Trees, C. Pulsrikarn et al. // BMC Microbiol.
- 2012. Vol. 12. - P. 92.
30. Jenkins C. Salmonella spp. In Principles and Practice of Clinical Bacteriology / C. Jenkins, S.H. Gillespie.
- England, 2006. - P. 367-376.
31. Pokrovskiy V.I. Meditsinskaya mikrobiologiya / V.I. Pokrovskiy, O.K. Pozdeyev. - M: GEOTR, 1999. -1200 s.