CC BY
58
Selective Protective Potency of Yersinia pestis AnlpD Mutants
S. V. Dentovskaya1, S. A. Ivanov1, P. Kh. Kopylov1, R. Z. Shaikhutdinova1, M. E. Platonov1, T. I. Kombarova1, T. V. Gapel'chenkova1, S. V. Balakhonov2, A. P. Anisimov1* 1State Research Center for Applied Microbiology, Obolensk, Moscow Region, 142279, Russia 2Irkutsk Antiplague Research Institute of Siberia and Far East, Trilissera Str., 78, 664047, Irkutsk, Russia
*E-mail: anisimov@obolensk.org, a-p-anisimov@yandex.ru Received: 12.06.2014
Copyright © 2015 Park-media, Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT It has recently been shown that the NlpD lipoprotein is essential to Yersinia pestis virulence and that subcutaneous administration of the nlpD mutant could protect mice against bubonic and pneumonic plague better than the EV vaccine strain [PLoS One 2009. V. 4. № 9. e7023]. In this study, similar AnlpD mutants were generated on the basis of other Y. pestis parent strains, including strains from the subspecies microtus, which is avirulent to guinea pigs and humans. Comparative testing confirmed that immunization of mice with AnlpD mutants induces immunity 105 times more potent than the one induced by the administration of the EV vaccine strain. At the same time, NlpD- bacteria failed to protect guinea pigs in the case of a subcutaneous challenge with Y. pestis, inducing a 106 times less potent protection compared with that conferred by immunization with the EV vaccine strain. The possible causes of the observed phenomena are discussed. KEYWORDS Yersinia pestis, AnlpD mutant, selectivity of protective potency, live plague vaccine. ABBREVIATIONS SCPM-Obolensk - State Collection of Pathogenic Microbes and Cell Cultures on the base of State Research Center for Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology; SRCAMB - State Research Center for Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology; II - index of immunity; ELISA - enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; CFU - colony-forming unit; LPS - lipopolysaccharide; CS - current study; CCIARISFE- Culture Collection of Irkutsk Antiplague Research Institute of Siberia and Far East; PHAT - passive hemagglutination test; DCL (LD100) - absolutely lethal dose (dosis certa letalis); ImD50 - immunizing dose protecting 50% of infected animals from death; LB - Luria-Bertani broth; LD50 - dose lethal for 50 % of infected animals.
INTRODUCTION
Live vaccines stimulate not only humoral, but also cell-mediated immunity, which, in some species, plays the leading role in the immunogenesis of plague [1—8]. Furthermore, live vaccines constructed on the basis of attenuated strains contain not merely one or two immunodominant antigens, but a whole range of complex (protein complexes with lipopolysaccharides (LPS), etc.) conformationally labile and minor antigens, which ensure induction of a "heterogeneous" immune response after a single immunization. This immune response can protect different species of animals against bacterial pathogens, including bacteria with partially altered antigenic specificity, in case of both subcutaneous and aerosol administrations [3, 7—11]. However, a commercial live plague vaccine created on the basis of the Yersinia pestis EV strain can cause local and systemic adverse reactions of varying severity in 5-29% of subjects with a normal immune status, regardless of route of administration [1, 2, 12, 13]. Therefore, studies aimed at creating live plague vaccines based on pre-
cisely attenuated strains of Y. pestis with superior im-munogenicity and reduced reactogenicity compared to those of the commercial EV vaccine strain remain relevant [2, 8, 14-19].
Potential target genes for the attenuation of virulent strains are either selected (i) by random mutagenesis with individually labeled transposons [20], (ii) using reverse vaccinology techniques [21-23] or (iii) chosen by investigating analogs of genes from other bacterial pathogens, whose mutations had been previously shown to reduce virulence [24]. For example, a relationship has been established in the past decade between the expression of the nlpD/lppB (novel lipoprotein D/lipoprotein B) family of genes and survival of some gram-negative bacteria in a stressful environment, as well as their pathogenicity [18, 25, 26]. It has been shown [14] that lipoprotein NlpD is essential for virulence of the plague pathogen Y. pestis in case of subcutaneous and aerosol administration. Moreover, immunization of mice by 105 CFU of AnlpD-mutant of Y. pestis Kimberley53 strain, followed by administra-
tion of 105 LD50 of the wild-type Kimberley53 strain (1 LD50 = 1-3 CFU) resulted in a 100% survival rate, whereas the EV vaccine strain protected only 10% of the animals against death.
The purpose of this study was to construct AnlpD mutants of other parental Y. pestis strains, including strains of subsp. microtus, which are avirulent for guinea pigs and humans, and to evaluate their protective potency in mice and guinea pigs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains used in the study and their characteristics are listed in Table 1. Strains of Y. pestis and Escherichia coli were grown in liquid or solid Hottinger culture media (various batches prepared in the SRCAMB) and LB (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% sodium chloride)
Intact nlpD gene
surE pcm nlpD rpoS
I--
Replacementofafragment ofthe nlpD genewiththe cat geneflankedby FRT loci
surE pcm FRT cat FRT nlpD rpoS
Deletionof the cat gene
surE pcm FRT nlpD rpoS
Construction of Y. pestis AnlpD mutants. Detailed description of the strategy is given in [30, 31]
at pH 7.2. Selection of cells containing recombinant plas-mids was carried out in the media supplemented with antibiotics ampicillin (100 ^g/mL), chloramphenicol (10 |^g/mL), and polymyxin B (100 |^g/mL). Strains of Y. pestis for the immunization and infection of animals were grown at 28 °C for 48 h.
Mutagenesis
Y. pestis mutants were constructed by homologous recombination with a recombinant plasmid pCVD442-AnlpD::cat based on the suicide vector pCVD442 [30], in which a portion of the cloned coding sequence of the nlpD gene (nucleotides 112-318) was replaced with the cat gene from pKD3 plasmid [31] (Figure).
pCVD442-AnlpD::cat plasmid from a donor E. coli S17-1 Apir strain was transferred into a recipient wild type Y. pestis strain (231, I-3455 or I-2359) by conjugation. Elimination of the suicide vector and selection of Y. pestis clones were performed in the presence of 5% sucrose and chloramphenicol [30]. The chloramphenicol resistance gene was removed using pCP20 plasmid [31] (Figure). pCP20 plasmid was removed by culturing bacteria at 40°C in a medium containing 2.5 mM of calcium chloride overnight. Clones that had lost resistance to the both ampicillin (100 ^g/mL) and chloramphenicol (20 ^g/mL) were selected. The accuracy of recombination was monitored by a polymerase chain reaction.
Microscopic studies and bacteriological assays
Microscopic studies, the rates of growth and lysis of cultures by plague bacteriophage L-413C, fibrinolytic
Table 1. Characteristics of the microorganism strains used in the study
Strain Characteristics Source of the strain and/ or reference*
Y. pestis
EV NIIEG line pFra+pCad+pPst+Apgm (subsp. pestis bv. orientalis), vaccine strain SCPM-Obolensk
231 pFra+pCad+pPst+Pgm+ (subsp. pestis bv. antiqua), wild type SCPM-Obolensk
231 AnlpD AnlpD mutant of 231 CS
I-3455 pFra+pCad+pPst+Pgm+ (subsp. microtus, bv. altaica)**, wild type CCIARISFE
I-3455AnlpD AnlpD mutant of I-3455 CS
I-2359 pFra+pCad+pPst+Pgm+ (subsp. microtus, bv. altaica), wild type CCIARISFE
I-2359AnlpD AnlpD mutant of I-2359 CS
E. coli
DH5a Xpir F-, X-, recA1, endAl, gyrA96, thi-1, hsdR17(rK,mK+), supE44, recA1 [27]
S17-1 Xpir thi pro hsdR- hsdM+ recA RP4 2-Tc::Mu-Km::Tn7(TpR SmR PmS) [28]
* SCPM-Obolensk, State Collection of Pathogenic Microorganisms and Cell Cultures of the State Research Center for Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (Rospotrebnadzor); CCIARISFE, Culture Collection of the Irkutsk Antiplague Research Institute of Siberia and Far East (Rospotrebnadzor).
** Names of Y. pestis subspecies and biovars as proposed in [29].
and plasma-coagulase activities, pigmentation pheno-type, and plasmid profile were assayed as described in [14, 32-34].
Immunochemical studies
F1 titers in Y. pestis strains under study were determined by a passive hemagglutination test as described in [35].
Antibody titers against F1 and LcrV antigens in the sera of animals immunized for evaluation of the immunity index (see below) were determined by indirect ELISA on day 21 after subcutaneous administration of the constructed and control strains. Antibody titers were determined individually in five randomly selected animals in each group of 40 animals immunized with one of the constructed or control strains, followed by calculation of the mean titer in the group. The titer value was defined as the highest dilution of specific antisera that corresponded to the optical density of the substrate solution at a wavelength of 492 nm, which was 0.1 higher than the value observed for the same dilution of the control [36]. The difference between the theoretical and experimental values of A492 was calculated and plotted versus appropriate dilutions of antisera, which were fitted by a polynomial function.
The intensity of immunity (immunity index), i.e., the
vaccine's ability to protect animals against death after administration of high doses of virulent strains on day 21 after the immunization, was calculated using the following formula:
II =
LD„
LD„
(1)
where II is the immunity index; LD50imm is LD50 for animals immunized with a strain under study, CFU; and LD„ .. is LD„ for naïve animals, CFU [351.
50nal 50 î L J
To determine the immunity index, the animals were immunized subcutaneously with two-day-old agar cultures of the constructed and control strains (40 guinea pigs and 40 mice per strain): guinea pigs at a dose of 5x 103 CFU in 0.5 mL, BALB/c mice at a dose of 104 CFU in 0.2 mL. On day 21 after the immunization, the animals were infected with a virulent Y. pestis 231 strain at four doses: 102, 104, 106, and 108 CFU (guinea pigs in a volume of 0.5 ml, mice in a volume of 0.2 mL). Naïve (control) animals were simultaneously infected at doses of 1, 5, 25, and 125 CFU in the same volume as the immunized ones. Infected animals were kept under observation for 20 days. Animals that succumbed to infection were sacrificed and examined bacteriologically.
Safety of Y. pestis strains
The safety of the constructed Y. pestis strains in BALB/c mice and guinea pigs was assessed as described in [35]. Cultures of Y. pestis strains under study were administered subcutaneously to mice (18-20 g) at a dose of 102, 103, 105 and 107 CFU (10 mice per dose) and five guinea pigs (180-200 g) at a dose of 1.5X 1010 CFU.
Statistical methods
ImD50 values of nlpD strains and LD50 of the virulent strain for immunized and naïve animals, as well as the corresponding confidence intervals (95% level of confidence), were calculated using the Kärber method [37].
RESULTS
Evaluation of immunogenic potency of vaccine candidates was performed in accordance with the Methodological Guidelines [35]. The immunogenicity of the constructed strains was assessed by their ImD50 values. Guinea pigs (10 animals per group) were immunized subcutaneously in the upper third of the right femur by two-day-old agar cultures of the strains under study at doses of 4X10, 2X102, 1X103 and 5X103 CFU in a total volume of 0.5 mL. BALB/c mice (10 animals per group) were immunized subcutaneously with 2X102, 1X 103, 5X103 and 2.5X 104 CFU in a total volume of 0.2 mL. The animals were challenged in the upper third of the left femur on day 21 after subcutaneous immunization at a dose corresponding to 200 DCL (LD100) of a virulent Y. pestis strain (in our experiments, 1 DCL was equal to 10 CFU in mice and 100 CFU in guinea pigs). Infected animals were kept under observation for 20 days. Animals that succumbed to infection were sacrificed and examined bacteriologically.
Construction and characterization of NlpD-variants of virulent Y. pestis strains 23lAnlpD, I-2359AnlpD, and I-3455AnlpD mutants without antibiotic resistance genes were obtained by site-directed mutagenesis of the nlpD gene in Y. pestis subsp. pestis strain 231 and two subsp. microtus bv. altaica strains I-2359 and I-3455, respectively, followed by deletion of the chloramphenicol resistance marker.
Microscope analyses of Gram-stained smears prepared from 23lAnlpD, I-2359AnlpD, and I-3455AnlpD strains revealed that culturing of the mutant strains at 28°C results in the formation of undivided chains containing an average of 8.2±3.6 cells/chain as opposed to aggregative morphology of cultures of the parent Y. pestis 231, I-2359, and I-3455 strains. Elevation of the culturing temperature to 37°C reduced the mean number of mutant cells per chain to 4±2.5 for AnlpD mutants. The morphology of cells and cell clusters of the wild-type strains was temperature-independent. The
RESEARCH ARTICLES Table 2. Antibody response to administration of Y. pestis strains based on ELISA data
Mean IgG titers (inverse values)
Strains 231 AnlpD I-3455AnlpD I-2359AnlpD EV NIIEG
Guinea pigs
Antigen
F1 4435 ± 1625 2650 ± 1045 130 ± 80 127630 ± 52830
LcrV 1555 ± 840 710 ± 260 920 ± 630 94390 ± 49290
Mice
Antigen
F1 942560 ± 16620 9140 ± 1590 550 ± 95 310 ± 140
LcrV 2465 ± 970 6715 ± 1620 1580 ± 850 235 ± 85
growth rate of Y. pestis 231AnlpD was identical to that of the parent strain at both 28 and 37°C.
The constructed AnlpD mutants were lysed by the plague diagnostic bacteriophage L-413C. Based on the data of the passive hemagglutination test, the level of F1 capsular antigen in the mutants was 4-16 times higher than that in the culture of Y. pestis vaccine strain EV line NIIEG grown under similar conditions (1-4 ^g/109 CFU and 0.25 ^g/109 CFU, respectively). These AnlpD-mutants were not inferior to the EV strain in terms of their fibrinolytic and plasma coagulase activities. They contained the same three pFra, pCad, and pPst plasmids as the vaccine strain; however, they differed from the EV strain in their ability to absorb pigments.
Determination of safety of the strains
All strains of Y. pestis defective in the nlpD gene, 231AnlpD, I-3455AnlpD, and I-2359AnlpD, as well as Y. pestis EV vaccine strain, were avirulent in mice upon subcutaneous administration to BALB/c mice (100% survived the infection at a dose of 102, 103, 105 and 107 CFU), and in guinea pigs (100% survival rate at a dose of 1.5X1010 CFU). The animals were kept under observation for 50 days.
Antibody response to vaccine candidates
Levels of antibodies against Y. pestis F1 and LcrV in the blood of BALB/c mice were evaluated on day 21 after subcutaneous immunization with Y. pestis strain under study at a dose of 104 CFU (Table 2). Mean antibody titers against F1 and LcrV in the mouse sera after vaccination with cultures of Y. pestis 231AnlpD and I-3455AnlpD exceeded those obtained for Y. pestis I-2359AnlpD and EV vaccine strain (p < 0.05).
Titers of anti-F1- and anti-LcrV-antibodies in the blood of the vaccinated and control guinea pigs were determined on day 21 after subcutaneous immunization with Y. pestis strain under study at a dose of 5x 104
CFU (Table 2). According to our data, mean antibody titers against F1 and LcrV in the sera of guinea pigs after administration of the EV vaccine strain were two-three orders of magnitude higher than the values for the strains 23lAnlpD, I-3455AnlpD, and I-2359AnlpD (p < 0.05). Antibody response to Y. pestis F1 and LcrV in guinea pigs after administration of the vaccine and constructed strains varied; in mice, the response was more uniform.
The levels of circulating anti-F1 and anti-LcrV antibodies in the blood of mice immunized with the vaccine-candidate strains Y. pestis 23lAnlpD and I-3455AnlpD were significantly higher than those for guinea pigs immunized with the same strains.
In the control group, no antibodies against Y. pestis F1 and LcrV were detected after administration of an isotonic sodium chloride solution.
The protective efficacy of vaccine candidate strains
The indicators of immunogenic potency and immunity indices for BALB/c mice after a single immunization are presented in Table 3. For laboratory animals of this species, ImD50 of Y. pestis 23lAnlpD and I-3455AnlpD strains was 58 and 26 times lower than that of the EV vaccine strain, respectively; however, the value was 1.5 times higher for I-2359AnlpD strain. The immunity indices for Y. pestis 23lAnlpD and I-3455AnlpD were five orders of magnitude higher than that of the EV vaccine strain, but they were only 2.5 times higher for I-2359AnlpD.
The opposite was observed for guinea pig models in immunogenic potency and immunity index experiments (Table 4). ImD50 was 140, 66, and 1692 times higher for Y. pestis 23lAnlpD, I-3455AnlpD, and I-2359AnlpD strains, respectively, than for the EV vaccine strain. The immunity index of the EV vaccine strain was six orders of magnitude higher than that of the strains 231 AnlpD and I-3455AnlpD and seven orders of magnitude higher than that of the strain I-2359AnlpD.
Table 3. Indicators of immunogenic potency and intensity of immunity in BALB/c mice vaccinated with nlpD mutants of Y. pestis strains 231, I-3455, and I-2359
Immunizing strain of Y. pestis ImD CFU 50' Immunity index
LD50 upon challenging with Y. pestis 231, CFU II
231 AnlpD 1.3 X 102 (5.3 x 10 ^ 3.4 x 102) 3.9 x 108 (too large) 7.1 x 107
I-3455AnlpD 2.9 x 102 (1.2 x 102 ^ 7.5 x 102) 2.5 x 107 (1 x 107 ^ 3.9 x 108) 4.5 x 107
I-2359AnlpD 1.1 x 104 (4.4 x 103 ^ 2.8 x 104) 2.5 x 103 (6.3 x 102 ^ 3.9 x 103) 4.5 x 102
EV NIIEG 7.5 x 103 (2.4 x 103 ^ 5.9 x 104) 1.0 x 103 (2.5 x 102 ^ 3.9 x 103) 1.8 x 102
Table 4. Indicators of immunogenic potency and intensity of immunity in guinea pigs vaccinated with nlpD-mutants of Y. pestis strains 231, I-3455, and I-2359
Immunity index
Immunizing strain of Y. pestis ImD„, CFU 50' LD50, upon challenging with Y. pestis 231, CFU II
231 AnlpD 9.1 X 103 (too large) 63 (1.6 x 10 ^ 2.5 x 102) 3.7
I-3455AnlpD 4.3 X 103 (too large) 158 (4.0 x 10 ^ 6.3 x 102) 9.3
I-2359AnlpD 1.1 X 105 (too large) 10 (3 ^ 4.0 x 10) 0.59
EV NIIEG 65 (1.6 x 10 ^ 2.6 x 102) 1.6 x 108 (too large) 9.4 x 106
DISCUSSION
To evaluate the universal applicability of a combination of attenuation and high immunogenicity of Y. pestis AnlpD mutants, site-directed mutagenesis was performed in three wild-type Y. pestis strains: one subsp. pestis bv. antiqua strain 231 and two subsp. microtus bv. altaica strains I-3455 and I-2359. Subsp. microtus strains, which include biovar altaica [29], are known to be virulent for mice, but avirulent for guinea pigs, rabbits, and humans [38, 39]. It is believed [40] that sub-sp. microtus strains possessing all protective antigens are avirulent for humans and can be used to design live plague vaccines. Furthermore, one of the strains used in our study, bv. altaica I-3455, produces LcrV with increased immunogenic/protective activity (due to the replacement of tryptophan at position 113 with glycine) [41].
In the Russian Federation all trials of attenuated Y. pestis vaccine candidate strains are conducted by comparing them to the reference Y. pestis vaccine strain EV line NIIEG. According to [35], "the strain, proposed
as a vaccine, must match or surpass the reference vaccine strain in immunogenicity, match the control strain in safety and reactogenicity or be safer; however, some non-essential characteristics that define it as a member of Y. pestis species may be different from the reference strain." "Non-essential characteristics" mean that "an experimental vaccine candidate strain must:
- be susceptible to the plague diagnostic bacteriophage L-413C;
- have typical culture-morphological properties;
- have F1 titer not lower than that obtained for the culture of the control Y. pestis EV strain, grown under similar conditions;
- have less than 0.3% calcium-independent mutants in the population of plague microbe cultures, which has been passaged through laboratory animals and exposed to neither long-term storage nor physical impact;
- at least match the fibrinolytic and plasma coagulase activities of the control strain;
- constructed and control strains must have pigmentation-negative phenotype; and
- the vaccine strains under study must have the same electrophoregram pattern as the reference EV strain: three bands of DNA plasmids corresponding to pFra (60 MD), pCad (47 MD), and pPst (6 MD)". The first of the plasmids encodes the main Y. pestis immunogen, its capsular F1 antigen. The second one encodes a system that allows extracellularly located bacteria to neutralize the host cells involved in the immune response, Yop virulon, and the second immunodominant antigen LcrV involved in the virulon system; the third plasmid encodes the plasminogen activator responsible for dissemination of the plague microbe in host tissues
[13].
The constructed Y. pestis AnlpD mutants met most of the requirements for non-essential indicators of plague microbe vaccine strains [35]. They were susceptible to L-413C bacteriophage, the production of F1 in the mutant strains was 2-4 times higher than that in the EV strain, fibrinolytic and plasma coagulase activity in all strains were at the same level, and all strains contained a full set of the three classic Y. pestis plas-mids.
The culture-morphological properties of AnlpD mutants of the 231, I-3455, and I-2359 strains, such as their filamentous morphology, distinguish them from wild-type bacteria and the EV vaccine strain, which is in agreement with data [14] indicating that Y. pestis NlpD lipoprotein plays an important role in cell separation. Particular features of cell separation may be the main cause of attenuation in AnlpD mutants.
The constructed strains preserved their ability to absorb pigments at the level of the wild-type strains, since their attenuation did not result from deletion of the pgm locus, but rather that of the nlpD structural gene.
In terms of compliance of AnlpD mutants with the main selection criteria for Y. pestis vaccine strains, the degree of attenuation (safety) of NlpD- strains was not inferior to that of the EV stain in mice and guinea pigs. However, the second criterion, immunogenicity, was more ambiguous. This parameter was evaluated in two animal species in three independent tests: titers of antibodies against F1 and LcrV, determination of immunizing doses, which protect 50% of infected animals against death, and immunity indices.
Even though the antibody levels are only partially correlated with the protective efficacy of plague vaccines, the humoral immunity plays an important role in protection against the disease [42]. The data obtained demonstrate the development of an effective immune response in mice after administration of attenuated Y. pestis cultures; the AnlpD strains were statistically sig-
nificantly superior to the EV vaccine strain. The opposite was observed in the experiments on guinea pigs; the vaccine strain was superior to AnlpD mutants in its ability to induce an antibody response.
In a mouse model, Y. pestis strains 23lAnlpD and I-3455AnlpD were statistically significantly superior to the EV strain in terms of ImD50 and, especially, II values. In experiments on guinea pigs, the constructed strains were inferior to the vaccine strain and the immunity index in animals immunized with AnlpD mutants was close to l; i.e., it almost did not differ from this index in naive animals.
The results of our experiments confirm the findings of other researchers showing that different animal species have different reactions to the same antigen/vaccine formulations [12, 43-48]. The differences in the protective efficacy of Y. pestis NlpD" mutants in guinea pigs and mice may be attributed to the peculiarities of immunogenesis in these biological models [2]. The lack of protective efficacy of AnlpD mutants in guinea pigs can have at least two possible explanations.
On the one hand, attenuation by mutation in the nlpD gene may result in an excessive decrease in residual virulence [12, 49], and, therefore, the mutants are unable to replicate in the guinea pigs for a period of time long enough to induce immunity.
On the other hand, it is possible that NlpD lipopro-tein of the plague pathogen is the insoluble "residual" antigen R or one of its constituents and that it induces potent long-term protection against the plague in guinea pigs [50-52]. Consequently, its absence in the cultures used for immunization may be the main reason for the weak protective properties of AnlpD mutants.
We are currently conducting experiments to test these two hypotheses.
CONCLUSIONS
To sum up the data obtained in this study, without additional modifications that would increase their im-munogenicity in guinea pigs, AnlpD mutants are not promising candidates for live plague vaccines due to the selectivity of their protective potency in different animal species. •
This research was conducted in the Laboratory for Plague Microbiology of the State Research Center for Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology as a part of government contracts No. 40-D of 30.05.2012, No. 34-D of 08.08.2013 within the framework of FTP "National System of Chemical and Biological Safety of the Russian Federation (2009-2014)."
REFERENCES
1. Naumov A.V., Ledvanov M.Yu., Drozdov I.G. Immunologiya chumy (Plague immunology). Saratov: Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute "Microbe", 1992. 172 p.
2. Dentovskaya S.V., Kopylov P.Kh., Ivanov S.A., Ageev S.A., Anisimov A.P. // Mol. Genet. Microbiol. Virol. 2013. V. 28.
P. 87-98.
3. Feodorova V.A., Corbel M.J. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2009. V. 8. P. 1721-1738.
4. Firstova V.V., Tyurin E.A., Kravchenko T.B., Zyrina E.V., Biketov S.F., Dyatlov I.A. // Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012.
V. 954. P. 173-177.
5. Li B., Du C., Zhou L., Bi Y., Wang X., Wen L., Guo Z., Song Z., Yang R. Clin. // Vaccine Immunol. 2012. V. 19. P. 228-234.
6. Smiley S.T. // Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2007. V. 603. P. 376-386.
7. Smiley S.T. // Immunol. Rev. 2008. V. 225. P. 256-271.
8. Sun W., Roland K.L., Curtiss R. 3rd. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries.
2011. V. 5. P. 614-627.
9. Anisimov A.P., Molecular genetic mechanisms of formation and functional significance of Yersinia pestis capsule. Saratov: Russian Research Anti-Plague Institute "Microbe", Obolensk: State Research Center for Applied Microbiology, 1999.
10. Korobkova E.I. Zhivaya protivochumnaya vaktsina (Live antiplague vaccine). Moscow: Medgiz, 1956. 208 p.
11. Girard G. // Biol. Med. (Paris). 1963. V. 52. P. 631-731.
12. Meyer K.F., Smith G., Foster L., Brookman M., Sung M. // J. Infect. Dis. 1974. V. 129 (Suppl. 1). P. S85-S120.
13. Perry R.D., Fetherston J.D. // Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1997. V. 10. P. 35-66.
14. Tidhar A., Flashner Y., Cohen S., Levi Y., Zauberman A., Gur D., Aftallon M., Elhanany E., Zvi A., Shafferman A., Mamroud E. // PLoS One. 2009. V. 4: e7023.
15. Braciale V.L., Nash M., Sinha N., Zudina I.V., Motin V.L. Correlates of Immunity Elicited by Live Yersinia pestis Vaccine. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH. Volume 1, Frontiers in Research. Edited by: Vassil St. Georgiev. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc., 2007: 473-480.
16. Derbise A., Cerdà Marin A., Ave P., Blisnick T., Huerre M., Carniel E., Demeure C.E. // PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012. V. 6: e1528.
17. Rosenzweig J.A., Chopra A.K. // Expert Rev. Vaccines.
2012. V. 11 P. 659-661.
18. Sha J., Agar S.L., Baze W.B., Olano J.P., Fadl A.A., Erova T.E., Wang S., Foltz S.M., Suarez G., Motin V.L., et al. // Infect Immun. 2008. V. 76. P. 1390-1409.
19. Zhang X., Qi Z., Du Z., Bi Y., Zhang Q., Tan Y., Yang H., Xin Y., Yang R., Wang X. // Vaccine. 2013. V. 31. P. 25392542.
20. Flashner Y., Mamroud E., Tidhar A., Ber R., Aftalion M., Gur D., Lazar S., Zvi A., Bino T., Ariel N., et al. // Infect. Immun. 2004. V. 72. P. 908-915.
21. Garbom S., Forsberg A., Wolf-Watz H., Kihlberg B.M. // Infect. Immun. 2004. V. 72. P. 1333-1340.
22. Rappuoli R. // Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2000. V. 3. P. 445-450.
23. Sun W., Roland K.L., Branger C.G., Kuang X., Curtiss R. // PLoS One. 2009. V. 4: e6720.
24. Oyston P.C., Mellado-Sanchez G., Pasetti M.F., Nataro J.P., Titball R.W., Atkins H.S. // Microb. Pathog. 2010. V. 48. P. 191-195.
25. Padmalayam I., Kelly T., Baumstark B., Massung R. // Infect. Immun. 2000. V. 68. P. 4972-4979.
26. Sha J., Kirtley M.L., van Lier C.J., Wang S., Erova T.E., Kozlova E.V., Cao A., Cong Y., Fitts E.C., Rosenzweig J.A., Chopra A.K. // Infect Immun. 2013. V. 81. P. 815-828.
27. Woodcock D., Crowther P., Doherty J., Jefferson S., De Cruz E., Noyer-Weidner M., Smith S., Michael M., Graham M. // Nucleic Acids Res. 1989. V. 17. P. 3469-3478.
28. Simon R., Priefer U., Pulher A. // Biotechnology. 1983. V. 1. P. 784-791.
29. Platonov M.E., Evseeva V.V., Dentovskaya S.V., Anisimov
A.P. // Mol. Genet. Microbiol. Virol. 2013. V. 28 P. 41-45.
30. Datsenko K., Wanner B. // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000. V. 97. P. 6641-6645.
31. Donnenberg M.S., Kaper J.B. // Infect. Immun. 1991. V. 59. P. 4310-4317.
32. Filippov A.A., Solodovnikov N.S., Kookleva L.M., Prot-senko O.A. // FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990. V. 55. P. 45-48.
33. Filippov A.A., Sergueev K.V., He Y., Huang X.Z., Gnade
B.T., Mueller A.J., Fernandez-Prada C.M., Nikolich M.P. // PLoS One. 2011. V. 6: e25486.
34. Bahmanyar M., Cavanaugh D.C. Plague manual. Geneva: WHO, 1976. 78 p.
35. Anisimova T.I., Sayapina L.V., Sergeeva G.M., Isupov I.V., Beloborodov R.A., Samoilova L.V., Anisimov A.P., Ledvanov M.Y., Shvedun G.P., Zadumina S.Y. et al. Main requirements for vaccine strains of the plague pathogen: Methodological Guidelines MU 3.3.1.1113-02 (approved by the Main State Health Officer of Russian Federation on 02.03.2002). Moscow, 2002. 69 p.
36. Qiu Y., Liu Y., Qi Z., Wong W., Kou Z., Zhang Q., Liu G., Yang X., Xin Y., Li C. et al. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. 2010. V. 72. P. 425-433.
37. Finney D.J. Statistical method in biological assay, 3rd Ed. London: Charles Griffin, 1978. 508 p.
38. Anisimov A.P., Lindler L.E., Pier G.B. Intraspecific diversity of Yersinia pestis Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004. V. 17. P. 434-464.
39. Song Y., Tong Z., Wang J., Wang L., Guo Z., Han Y., Zhang J., Pei D., Zhou D., Qin H. et al. DNA Res. 2004. V. 11. P. 179-197.
40. Zhou D., Tong Z., Song Y., Han Y., Pei D., Pang X., Zhai J., Li M., Cui B., Qi Z. et al. // J. Bacteriol. 2004. V. 186.
P. 5147-5152.
41. Kopylov P.Kh., Bakhteeva I.V., Anisimov A.P., Dentovs-kaja S.V., Ivanov S.A., Kiseleva N.V., Levchuk V.P., Pan-fertsev E.A., Platonov M.E., Svetoch T.E. et al. Russian patent RUS 2439155 C1, C12N15/10, C07H21/00, C12N15/70, C12N1/21, C12P21/00, C12R1/19, 2010.
42. Bashaw J., Norris S., Weeks S., Trevino S., Adamov-icz J.J., Welkos S. // Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2007. V. 14. P. 605-616.
43. Byvalov A.A., Pautov V.N., Chicherin Iu.V., Lebedinskii V.A., Evstigneev V.I. // Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immuno-biol. 1984. № 4. P. 74-76.
44. Burrows T.W. // Nature. 1957. V. 179. P. 1246-1247.
45. Hallett A.F., Issacson M., Meyer K.F. // Infect. Immun. 1973. V. 8. P. 876-881.
46. Jones S.M., Griffin K.F., Hodgson I., Williamson E.D. // Vaccine. 2003. V. 21. P. 3912-3918.
47. Von Metz E., Eisler D.M., Hottle G.A. // Appl. Microbiol. 1971. V. 22. P. 84-88.
48. Welkos S., Pitt M.L.M., Martinez M. Friedlander A., Vogel P., Tammariello R. // Vaccine. 2002. V. 20. P. 2206-2214.
49. Miranda K.L., Poester F.P., Minharro S., Dorneles E.M., Stynen A.P., Lage A.P. // Vaccine. 2013. V. 31. P. 3014-3018.
50. Brubaker R.R. // Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 1972. V. 57. P. 111-158.
51. Meyer K.F. // J. Immunol. 1950. V. 64. P. 139-163.
52. Schütze H. // Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1939. V. 19. P. 293-298.
