34RISK ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS ININNOVATIVE
PROJECTS: UZBEKISTAN
Shohruh Nishonkulov
The 2nd year student of economics, Kokand University
ABSTRACT
This study is a review on Risk analysis of foreign direct investments in innovative projects of Uzbekistan. The study will examine SWOT and PESTL analysis as an effective situation analysis tool which plays an important role in the fields of management, marketing, and in any fields of requiring strategic planning. SWOT is an analysis method used to evaluate the 'strengths', 'weaknesses', 'opportunities', 'threats' and PESTL is an analysis tool used for measuring the 'political', 'economical', 'social', 'technological' and 'low' risks involved in a various sphere of economy. In this study, firstly the essence of SWOT and PESTL analysis is explained, secondly the components of SWOT and PESTL analysis is examined. The paper includes risk analysis for further investigation to innovation sector of Uzbekistan economy.
Keywords risk analysis, investment, foreign direct investment, innovation, SWOT analysis, PESTL analysis.
1. INTRODUCTION
Modernization and focus on innovative development are necessary factors for the economic growth of any country. Developed countries have achieved economic success using the latest achievements of science and technology (S&T). However, the implementation of innovative technologies is a long, risky and costly process. At the moment, the main source of financing innovation is own funds. Since innovative projects always mean significant costs, riskiness and a long wait for return from invested funds, enterprises often face the problem of limited financial resources. That is why in the new global economy, attracting foreign investment is one of the central tasks facing both the companies and the government (economies try to create favorable conditions for attracting of foreign direct investment).
At the same time, according to the UNCTAD report, positive trends were observed in developing countries, especially in Asia. In 2019 the growth of foreign investment in Central Asian countries amounted to an average of 8-10%. In Uzbekistan this indicator grew 3.2 times ($ 15.9 billion) compared to the indicators of 2018 ($ 4.5 billion), which
June, 2022
153
provided the Republic with leadership among the countries of the region.
So, the purpose of this article is to find out the real problems and potential threats, which foreign investor may face when investing in innovative projects in Uzbekistan.
To analyze the situation, the hybrid model used by combining of SWOT and PESTL methods. The first method briefly discusses the strengths of the Republic of Uzbekistan as an object of investment and the likely potential for a foreign investor. Weaknesses and real threats to a foreign investor will be analyzed in detail using the second model.
2. SWOT & PESTL ANALYSIS: LITERATURE REVIEW
There are several analytical tools of market estimation. Most popular ones are SWOT and PESTL analysis. The use of SWOT and PESTEL analysis continues to spread among the academic reviewed literature. In the past decade, SWOT and PESTEL research has focused on analyzing organizations for the development of strategic recommendations. SWOT and PESTEL analysis as a methodology for strategic planning, has been extended beyond companies to industries and countries. These tools may be used in a different sphere of economic and social processes. Seungbum Lee and Patrick Walsh used SWOT and AHP hybrid model. They used the hybrid model for sport marketing outsourcing (Seungbum Lee and Patrick Walsh, 2011). In this paper we try to use SWOT and PESTEL hybrid model for risk analysis of foreign direct investments in innovative projects.
SWOT analysis is a tool used to determine and understand its strength and weaknesses and the opportunities and threats (SWOT - Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. Strengths). Alongside a general SWOT analysis, is essential to evaluate the relative strength and weaknesses of the company's leading competitors (John L. Thompson, Frank Martin, 2010:114). So, despite the simplicity, SWOT analysis is a powerful tool for scrutinize capabilities and deficiencies, its market opportunities, and the external threats. Arslan Ayub states that marketers after conducting marketing intelligence evaluate organization's potentials on the essence of available information through SWOT analysis. According him, strength refers to a company's capabilities and resources that enable it to gain competitive advantage over its competitors (Arslan Ayub, et al, 2013).
Some authors have a critical view of point on SWOT analysis. They argue that SWOT analysis is defective as a tool for strategic planning. They state because of its subjective, unsystematic, and nonquantitative nature, SWOT analysis has a lack of predictive
June, 2022
154
power. Based on a critique of SWOT analysis, Agarwal et. al. presented an alternative decision-support method that lies in its external environment (Agarwal et al., 2012).
Increasing of environmental and ecological issues have encouraged the implementation of another version. Tanya Sammut-Bonnici new version - STEER analytical tool, which incorporates regulatory factors (Tanya Sammut-Bonnici & Galea, David, 2015).
PESTEL analysis is essential for all marketers because of its aid in understanding the impacts of the external factors (Adcock, Halborg, & Caroline, 2001).
Moreover, PESTEL analysis may be used to examine the existing and future position of the industry that an organization originates. For example, Jinbo Song used PESTEL in the framework of analyzing the waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration industry in China. (Jinbo Song et al., 2017). Such approach aids in strategically planning in order to gain a competitive advantage over other companies in that industry.
There are many analytical works which combined PEST and SWOT tools. In the paper we also combined these tools. According to Tanya Sammut-Bonnici the benefits of combining PEST and SWOT are enhanced when using them in conjunction with Porter's five (competition in the industry; potential of new entrants into the industry; power of suppliers; power of customers; threat of substitute products) forces model (Tanya Sammut-Bonnici et al., 2015).
3. RISK ANALYSIS OF FDI IN INNOVATIVE PROJECTS OF UZBEKISTAN: SWOT AND PESTLAPPROACH
At the modern development stage of Uzbekistan in the framework of market relations liberalization, economic modernization, significantly increases the role of investments attracted to the economy of the country. One of the most important factors for ensuring stable growth in the volume of attracted investments, diversification of their sources and directions of use is the creation of the necessary regulatory framework for the regulation of various issues of investment activity.
Table 1. Dynamic of Foreign Direct Investment inflow of Uzbekistan Foreign Direct Investment 2016 2017 2018
FDI Inflow (million USD) 134 98 412
June, 2022
FDI Stock (million USD) 9,157 9,254 9,667
Number of Greenfield Investments 23 10 55
FDI Inwards (in % of GFCF*) 0.3 - -
FDI Stock (in % of GDP) 13.5
Reforms in Uzbekistan such as the foreign currency market liberalization and establishing special economic zones has made the country a more appealing market for foreign investors. According to the World Investment Report 2019, in 2018 FDI inflows increased from 98 million to USD 412 million. Mainly FDI focus on the energy sector and arrives from China, Russia, South Korea and Germany. Here we try to analyze the situation in Uzbekistan, by combining of SWOT and PESTL methods. The first method briefly discusses the strengths of the Republic. Weaknesses and real threats to a foreign investor will be analyzed in detail using the PESTL method.
SWOT analysis
The strengths of Uzbekistan as an object of foreign direct investment are:
1) convenient geographical location: Uzbekistan connects all CIS countries, which means a reduction in logistics costs. Strategic position between China and Europe increases the essence of geographic location of the country ("New Silk Road");
2) availability and diversified of natural resources (gas, gold, cotton, hydropower potential): Uzbekistan ranks second in the natural resources per capita sector in the region after Russia. Therefore, a foreign investor has the opportunity to use natural resources at a lower price than in other world markets;
3) tax system: Uzbekistan has one of the most sparing tax regimes in the world. Thus, income tax for residents is 12%, for non-residents - 20%, corporate tax rate -20%, VAT rate - 15%, dividends - 5% (10% if the payer or recipient of dividends is a foreign legal entity).
Opportunities for a foreign investor are as follows:
1) Uzbekistan's accession to the WTO. In march of 2020, Uzbekistan developed a WTO accession strategy that will affect a wide range of laws and regulations, including tariff policy, customs control, investors' rights, intellectual property protection, corruption, etc.;
2) the presence of administrative and political campaigns created in support of an ambitious and comprehensive program for developing the innovative system of Uzbekistan. Given
June, 2022
156
moment in the country there are special economic zones - territories with special legal status and economic benefits for attracting domestic and foreign investors to high-tech sectors of the economy and innovation-oriented industries.
However, Uzbekistan is not only a large market with scientific potential, highly qualified personnel, relatively cheap labor, but it is also a country in which investors may face risks such as economic instability, protectionism, red tape, corruption, etc. Within the framework of this article, it makes sense to combine weaknesses and threats into one category and discuss them in more detail based on the PESTEL model.
PESTL analysis
Political Risks (P). The political situation in the country is very stable. The government is actively pursuing a motivating foreign investment policy.
1) But, key industries are controlled by the government and it has prejudicial effects on foreign investors. Partial state ownership and government influence are common in many key industries, including airlines, mining, energy and telecommunications. Nevertheless, the government regulates investment and capital flows in the raw cotton and silk market in the country.
2) lack of transparency in the tax system. Although relatively low tax rates have been mentioned as the strength of Uzbekistan and an advantage for a foreign investor, there are some obstacles that a foreign investor may encounter. The lack of clear tax laws enables tax inspectors to interpret tax disputes not in favor of investors. In addition, Uzbek taxation is not transparent, since the tax system of Uzbekistan reflects a complex structure, this distinguishes it from the tax systems of other countries.
It is important to note here that a number of studies have shown that political risk is not a factor affecting foreign investment. For example, K. Fatehi-Seda and M. Safizeda (Fatehi-Sede K., et al., 1989) did not find a significant statistical relationship between political stability and FDI. K. Lee and A. Reznik (Li Q., Resnick A., 2003) also concluded that political instability does not have a statistically significant effect on FDI, although they noted that the duration and stability of the political regime helps attract new FDI.
Economic risks (E):
1) dependence on natural resources and on individual industries. Uzbekistan is rich in natural resources, and this is seen as an additional opportunity to minimize costs, however, a strong dependence on the export of natural resources and goods with a poor price
June, 2022
157
scenario for these natural resources affects the stability of the country's economy. Since prices are influenced by so many factors, they are quite unpredictable, which automatically raises uncertainty in the forecast of the development of the economy of Uzbekistan as a whole;
2) depreciation rate of fixed assets. According to the Statistics Committee of Uzbekistan, depreciation of fixed assets in some industries is more than 80%, while the dynamics of their renewal does not exceed 15%. In Uzbekistan, a foreign investor should be ready to invest up to 70% of the funds needed to upgrade funds, while in the world companies invest only up to 20-30%.
undiversified investment policy. In 2019 the energy, construction and transportation sectors were the main recipients of investments and the most of attracted FDI (attracted FDI USD 4.2 billion) was invested in the oil and gas sector.
Social risks (S): incompetence. The success of a project is often determined by the people who work on it, and therefore, the return on invested capital will depend on the knowledge of these people and how they apply their knowledge in practice. Earlier, a high level of education was mentioned as a strong point, but during 25 years, the science of Uzbekistan experienced hard times. The equipment at the enterprises is mainly imported, therefore, the investor will have to invest not only in the improvement of equipment, but also in training and re-profiling of personnel.
Innovation Risks (T): lack of a culture of innovation. In most industries, the main internal barrier is the corporate culture, which is dominated by the idea of risk aversion. In addition, Uzbekistan has only recently committed to modernization, so many companies simply do not understand the profitability of investing in innovation and are afraid of any changes.
Legal risks (L): Legislative framework that establishes guarantees and measures to protect the rights of foreign investors engaged in investment activities in the Republic of Uzbekistan has created. The Ministry of Investments and Foreign Trade and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Uzbekistan on a contractual basis provide foreign investors with consulting and legal assistance. Nevertheless, there are still a number of problems that hinder the investment attractiveness increasing of the country:
1) bureaucracy and corruption. A serious obstacle that investors face in Uzbekistan is bureaucracy and corruption. Obtaining a building permit requires passing a huge number of authorities and collecting various documents. For example, according to a World Bank report, it takes 246 days to obtain a building permit (versus 152 days in
June, 2022
158
OECD countries). This level of bureaucracy gives rise to a high level of corruption;
2) weak protection of property rights. The basis for success in investing is legal support for projects and patent protection of inventions. In 2020, The Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation rank Uzbekistan in terms of protection of property rights in 114th place in terms of economic freedom index (57.2 out of 100 points) among 186 countries. One of the reasons for this disappointing result is protectionism.
4. CONCLUSION
After the reforms on education in 2016 and currency exchange liberalization reform in 2017, there were high expectations for a continuation of essential reforms. These expectations were raised by announcing a number of new reforms in customs, tax system, banking, privatization, and business. In 2019 the economy of Uzbekistan continued its sustainable growth and the government kept economic stability in the country.
The government began pursuing more transparent economic policy and initiated several critical reforms, which resulted in business environment improvement. However, the reform strategy remains not entirely formulated and were not fully completed.
The Republic is one of the countries that in 2016-2020 achieved the best results in improving business performance due to regulatory reforms aimed at improving the business environment. However, the rating values of the country for a number of other indicators are not high enough. This reduces the investment activity of investors in innovative projects of the country.
Despite all the problems faced the economy of Uzbekistan, the dynamics of the of innovation development is becoming positive. More and more projects are receiving support from domestic and foreign investors, and thanks to state support, Uzbekistan is striving to acquire the title of innovative country. All measures taken by the state to minimize risks and attract investors, as well as all changes that will be applied in Uzbekistan with the accession to the WTO and the implementation of the modernization course, are designed to serve as the basis for a positive investment climate, economic development, and the creation of a powerful scientific and innovative base for sustainable development country as a whole.
June, 2022
REFERENCES
1. Butaboyev, M., Urinov, A., Mulaydinov, F., & Tojimatov, I. Digital economy.
2. Горовик, А. А., Мулайдинов, Ф. М., & Лазарева, М. В. (2018). Дистанционное образование как необходимое средство обучения в условиях современной экономики Узбекистана. In Цифровой регион: опыт, компетенции, проекты (pp. 122-125).
3. Kokand, F. M., Kokand, R. T., & Kokand, D. M. (2020). Trends in solving problems in the development of an innovative economy. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(6), 1205-1209.
4. Мулайдинов, Ф. М. (2021). КИЧИК БИЗНЕС ВА ТАДБИРКОРЛИКДА КРАУДФАНДИНГ ИМКОНИЯТЛАРИ. Academic research in educational sciences, 2(Special Issue 4), 23-32.
5. TURSUN, S., TUYCHIEVICH, B. M., & MUROTOVICH, M. F. (2020). Effects of the Global Crisis on the Economy of Uzbekistan During the Coronovirus Pandemidia and Measures to Ease IT. JournalNX, 6(05), 277-280.
6. Mulaydinov, F. M. (2021). CROWDFUND OPPORTUNITIES IN SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Academic research in educational sciences, 2, 23-32.
7. Mulaydinov, F., & Nishonqulov, S. (2021). The role of information technologies in the development of the digital economy. The role of information technologies in the development of the digital economy.
8. Farkhod, M., Azadkhon, K., Gulkhon, M., & Oybek, A. (2020). Advantages of the transition to a digital economy in the innovative development of Uzbekistan. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(6), 1226-1232.
9. Mulaydinov, F., & Nishonqulov, S. (2021). Raqamli iqtisodiyotni rivojlantirishda axborot texnologiyalarining orni-The role of information technologies in the development of the digital economy.
10. Mulaydinov, F. M. (2019). Econometric Modelling of the Innovation Process in Uzbekistan. Форум молодых ученых, (3), 35-43.
11. Farkhod, M. (2020). Econometric Modelling of the Innovation Process in Uzbekistan. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(02).
12. Mulaydinov, F. (2021). Digital Economy Is A Guarantee Of Government And Society Development. Ilkogretim Online, 20(3), 1474-1479.
13. Farxodjon ogli, N. S., & Odil ogli, R. B. (2021). Raqamli iqtisodiyot almashinuvining resurslar sarfiga sakkizta tasiri. Бошкарув ва
Этика Коидалари онлайн илмий журнали, 1(1), 53-56.
June, 2022
