CC BY
82. Nelyubin L.L. Textbook of military translation: English: general course. Second edition, expanded. Moscow: Voenizdat, 2011.
3. Samigova H.B. Morphological features of rhetoric in English and Uzbek languages, 2013. № 4(295).
4. Yampol S.G. The language of the military. Tom: Voenizdat, 2015.
RESEARCH RELEVANCE IN THE FIELD OF MILITARY
RHETORIC Sultanov B.R.1, Hudaykulova S.N.2
1Sultanov Behzod Rahmonkulovich - Senior Teacher;
2Hudaykulova Sevinch Nuriddin qizi - Student, DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, GULISTAN STATE UNIVERSITY, GULISTAN, REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Abstract: the article reveals the relevance of conducting scientific research in the field of military rhetoric, which, in the process of dynamic differentiation, performs a number of socially significant functions: it strengthens the defense capability of the state, ensures mutual understanding and interaction of military personnel in the process of fulfilling military service duties, contributes to the consolidation of the armies of different states in the event of common threats.
Keywords: virtual technologies, linguistic competence, interaction, network, software, individualization.
Military rhetoric is a means of external expression of a specialized culture, an essential component of the differentiation of the military-professional environment, which is an institutional structure of organized interaction of people, combining elements of specialized and everyday sociocultural experience. Military professional culture is the institutional structure of the classical model of organized interaction of people in the process of transformation of specialized and everyday sociocultural experience. The effectiveness of interaction is ensured, along with other factors, by a set of communicative skills and abilities, by the level of rhetorical competence of those communicating in acts of daily professional activity. Contemporary situation in the military sphere is highly influenced by different processes, including globalization, cooperation and coordination in the face of common dangers. The high dynamism and mobility of the organizational structures of the military-professional environment entails the need to transfer generally obligatory, socially necessary samples of unified stereotyped behavior. Differentiation of the levels of personal rhetorical competence of servicemen predetermines the socially significant problem of enculturation of representatives of different cultures in standard situations of uniform military-professional interaction.
The need for research in the field of military rhetoric, including typological, is explained by the following factors:
1) Uzbekistan is a multinational country, most of whose population speaks at least two languages. In addition to Uzbek, many speak Russian, Tajik, Karakalpak languages, the study of the English language is of great importance in the education system. As a result, at the ordinary level, there is an idea that there is no need to train servicemen in special speech behavior, including in foreign languages, although knowledge of foreign languages has long been a requirement in any modern army of developed countries of the world.
2) In theoretical terms, it is necessary to generalize particular definitions of communicative actions and speech socio-cultural manifestations in the military-professional
environment in order to introduce the concept of "military rhetoric" and substantiate its legitimacy. The broad synonymy and loose interpretation of military rhetoric rubs away its boundaries with other types of rhetoric and complicates its structural analysis. A scientific study of military rhetoric will help determine the situations and dynamic factors of mastering professional culture and improving individual speech behavior.
3) The lack of opportunities for the regular manifestation of speech activity requires the determination of the mechanisms of speech adaptation of military personnel to the standard situations of their interaction. The readiness to carry out communicative interaction in familiar conditions does not ensure the transfer of rhetorical skill to non-standard situations, characterized by functional novelty and stylistic diversity. The extreme conditions for the fulfillment of combat missions provide for the advance verbal socialization of servicemen in order to achieve the effectiveness of speech and ensure the actualization of effective actions aimed at fulfilling the duties of military service.
4) Actualization of speech competence determines the effectiveness of cultural identification of various categories of military personnel in the process of professional development of specialized experience.
In conclusion, it should be noted that military rhetoric is a part of the military humanitarian and legal culture, the features of the speech behavior of various categories of servicemen, give reason to offer specific differentiating technologies of effective verbal communication in situations of military-professional interaction.
References
1. Gibson J.M. Basics of Oratory Skills in Military Service Environment. New Hampshire: Air Books, 2019.
2. Harris Z.S. Structure and Semantics of Phrases in Speech of Military People. Vancouver: Green Press, 2018.
3. Самигова Х.Б. Морфологические особенности риторики в английском и узбекском языках // Вестник ЧелГУ, 2013. № 4(295).
4. Семенов В.Г. Управленческая культура офицерских кадров как фактор повышения боевой готовности войск. Дисс. канд. филос. наук. Москва: ВПА, 1988.
5. Сташек Н., Дегтярев И. О командном языке // Военный вестник, 2007. № 2. С. 8894.
