CC BY
16The year 2019 is called the Year of Active Investments and Social Development, with the goal of making logical progress and making progress in the work we started in 2018.
Positive results in the economy allow for a systematic solution to the problems in the social sphere, and we can achieve prosperity and prosperity only through active entrepreneurship, hard work and striving.
References
1. Mirziyoyev Sh.M. O'zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi qabul qilinganining 26 yilligiga bag'ishlangan tantanali marosimdagi ma'ruzasi. "Xalq so'zi", 2018 yil 8 dekabr. № 253-son, 2.
2. Giddens Entoni. Sotsiologiya. T.: Sharq, 2002. 459^1
PHILOSOPHY OF PRAGMATISM AND PRAGMATIC IDEAS
Bakhodirova F.B.
Bakhodirova Feruza Bakhodir qizi - Teacher, Independent Researcher, FOREIGN PHILOLOGY FACULTY, ENGLISH LINGUISTICS DEPARTMENT, URGENCH STATE UNIVERSITY, URGENCH, REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Abstract: another trend of the philosophy of the new world is the spread of pragmatism in the United States. Pragmatism has developed in the US in the 70s of the XIX century as a philosophical stream. It has strongly influenced the way people live, the spiritual life, the social consciousness of the country, and, in many cases, the way of editing traditional philosophy. Generally speaking, "pragmatism" is a thought-provoking teaching on the way to useful activity and ways and means of achieving "profits". This article deals with problems associated with pragmatism in a national concept.
Keywords: principles, social development, doctrines, theoretical philosophy, methodology.
Major representatives of the teaching of Pragmatism are C. Pierce, U. James, J. Dyui and others. Their doctrine is reflected in the variation of the universe. They describe experiment as a set of events that combine various coincidental and unusual situations, requiring rapid decisions from our lives. Intelligence is the means that governs the actions so that a person can operate without errors. According to J. Dyui, the intellect is the ability to copy the surrounding world and help it adapt to the environment. The purpose of the philosophy of pragmatism is to help people find their place in the world. Dyui points out the "useful" side of the experience.
Pragmatism expresses the values of American socio-cultural life, and is broadly distributed among business people, managers, policy makers and statesmen. Americans regard this theory's theorists as philosophers of great significance in transforming the outlook of the people and introducing the principles of contemporary American lifestyles into the public. For example, J. Dyui is called "American Aristotle". The analysis of ideas about social development began from the philosophy of antiquity, the times of Socratic and Plato.
The Italian philosopher Dj.Viko, who lived in the XVII-XVIII, and especially Gegel, a great representative of the German philosophy greatly contributed into the development of this field. There are many doctrines that advocate for the progressive development and progress of the revolutionary leap in the doctrines of social progress. Pragmatism has interpreted classical theoretical philosophy as a lifestyle, a dry theory, a passive doctrine that observes the reality from the outside and does not directly interfere with it.
Pragmatists accuse classical philosophy of limiting their perception of the origin of the existence and the origin of knowledge. True philosophy propagates the idea that people
must solve problems faced by the various situations in the society, which are moving forward and in front of society. In general, pragmatists are prone to look at the benefits of practicing inexplicable conclusions that are unrelated to human life, in the practice of giving them more value and more usefulness.
As the Pragmatists say, any theory can be considered as true if the worldview is beneficial to anyone. The new era in the pragmatic has created a methodology to see positive aspects. Therefore, the ideas of pragmatism have come into linguistics as well as in all sciences, and at the beginning they have been working in the field of semiotics, and today they also have other branches of linguistics. Generally speaking, "pragmatism is a process that involves the social activities of a person, through a particular communication situation. Linguistic pragmatics do not have a clear form, appearance; its circle includes a broad range of issues related to the subject of the speaker, the addresser, their interrelationships, communication intervention. Pragmatic ideas are used in the development of intuitive programming, machine translation, information search systems, and so on."
Today, an impartial and objective approach to pragmatism is shaping up without the permission of any "trace". Particularly, it does not necessarily mean that the two approaches are based on radical or conservative relationships, and they are superior to both of them, and have some creative principles and ideas in their realistic demands, but not interconnected, the pragmatism that comes from the realities of life, in social life, "achieving a positive outcome in every issue, including the establishment of public policy, not dogmatic ideological patterns, templates or fantasies, but rather a realistic approach to realistic goals, not just from the perspective of desires and populism. So, pragmatism also denies the radicalism that can lead to the development of "paralysis", as well as philosophical refinement of conservatism, which clings to past attitudes, which is the basis of progress and develops as a "living tree of life."
Like any other phenomenon, the communication situation is characterized by multiplication. It involves various systems with different aspects, which necessitates different approaches to them. However, it is clear that the appearance of these edges is different in their circumstances, and accordingly, it is not possible to draw all aspects of the study area, social necessity. In this sense, communication is also multifunctional as the language itself, and it is impossible to cover all aspects of one science. Today, pragmatics need language support and are taking "measures." In this sense, linguists who are dismissed from the language and who are looking for an object of learning through pragmatic problems can be compared to pragmatic "migrant workers" in a sense.
Summarizing the views of all pragmalingwists, we can say that a small number of them recognize the functionalization of language units as a subject matter of pragmalingivism. However, most researchers admit that the category of communicative activity and communication is pragmatic as an object of learning the traditions. During the dialogue, the language is recognized as a "bridge" and only relates to it, and the language remains in a communicative environment.
Pragmatics is a particular area of linguistics that explores the issues of choosing and applying linguistic units in the process of communication and the impact of these units on dialogue participants. These rules are understood as a broader context for communications. Such an analysis of the phenomenon of the linguistic phenomenon allows to identify obstacles and limitations existing in one or more of these situations. Pragmatic language research is a matter of linguistics or pragmatic aspect, as if it were a matter of fact, and it is clear that there is a situation in which this simplicity can be addressed. As the substance-pragmatic direction approaches the issue, it focuses its attention on linguistic backgrounds on substanceal basis, and in the process of analysis, the problem comes through the language.
It is characteristic to investigate the factual reality of linguistic abilities; it does not provide practical efficiency of the subject. Thus, it can be said that the pragmatism (ie, pragmatic linguistics), which is a traditional study object, transmits from the communication function, process and system to linguistic possibilities, is entirely independent of
41
pragmatism of linguistic pragmatism (linguistic pragmatism) and ensures its status as substitute linguistic heir.
It is evident that we are facing new challenges in the language policy and enlightenment of our time; we must recognize it as a social order, and harmonize the methodology of research in accordance with the requirements of this order. As you know, the development of science, scientific knowledge is continuous and intertwined.
References
1. National Encyclopedy of Uzbekistan. Tashkent, 2004.
2. Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistics. Tashkent: 2008.
3. Nematov H., Yuldasheva D. Commonality of opportunity and reality in language. Tashkent: Ma'rifat, 2013.
THE CONCEPT OF "IMPERATIVE" AND THEIR PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATION Khadjiyev U.Sh.
Khadjiyev Umrbek Shonazarovich - Independent Researcher, DEPARTMENT OF THE THEORY OF DEVELOPING DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY IN UZBEKISTAN,
HISTORY FACULTY, URGENCH STATE UNIVERSITY, URGENCH, REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Abstract: in this article oriental concept of "imperatives" and their philosophical analysis was discussed. Because human behavior is a firmly imperative subordinate principle that is self-directed, focused on the common good, it is strictly imperative that the imperative dictates to the will of man; it cannot be enforced because it is based on the belief and faith in the goodness of the behavior. Formation of moral and ethical requirements and laws in Eastern peoples has its own history and immanent character. In this article some examples from Indian culture were also given.
Keywords: indulgence, imperatives, traditions, value, customs.
The concept of "imperative" was introduced to philosophy by Kant. He describes the imperative as "ordering" and "commanding." [1] He concludes that all imperatives express themselves through necessity and compulsion, thus expressing the relation of the objective law of reason to the will which is not bound by this compulsion. Here the will is considered as subjective reality and it is subject to the objective laws. The philosopher thus states that "all imperatives are either hypothetical or strictly ordered. A strict imperative is an act of self-indulgence, independent of any other purpose" [1]. There is a force that exists for itself. The philosopher asks what actions can be good.
No doctrines that adequately answer this ancient question can be found. The behaviors and values that are being respected today may lose their value tomorrow and may even be disconnected from public life. According to I. Kant, it is subject to only objective laws of intellect, as an event that "has a strictly imperative lens which has a valid, practical apodic principle, bound to another purpose and to something else" [1]. When the philosopher associates imperatives with morality, he assumes that they are in conformity with the objective laws of the society and the requirements of reason.
Empirical human behavior is the principle behind which this principle is based. Commanding the will is ethical because it is embodied in faith, including good faith. Morality, as the philosopher writes, is reflected in the pursuit of a common good. In short,
