Optional reference method to determine frost resistance of concrete
Undergraduate O.N. Pertseva;
Dr.tech.sci., Professor S.G. Nilolskiy,
Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnical University
Abstract. The main purpose of this research is to create the new reference method to determine the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete that is characterized by small labor inputs, high efficiency and a wide scope application. The offered method is based on the measurement of long strength by a nondestructive method.
During this research, the theoretical analysis of concrete specimen dependence on freeze-thaw resistance and energy, which is emitted by a specimen during destruction, has been carried out. Freeze-thaw resistance of a specimen is calculated as the mathematical relation of these energies, and the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete is calculated as an arithmetic mean across specimens.
Correctness of the offered method is proved by experiments. The offered method doesn't demand long tests. It is highly efficient and has a wide scope, but special further laboratory test duration is needed.
Key words: frost resistance; concrete; long-term strength; dilatometric method; non-destructive loading; acoustic issue; relative tension set; durability of concrete
Introduction
Although there is a variety of modern construction materials and technological research in this area, concrete remains the most convenient material. It is a multipurpose and widespread material which is used in construction of buildings and structures. The most important properties of concrete, which show themselves at the design stage of objects, are durability of concrete in terms of compression/tension, water resistance and freeze-thaw resistance. In climatic conditions of northern latitudes, where the North West region of Russia is located, the latter property is considered the most important one.
Freeze-thaw resistance of concrete is an ability of a water-saturated concrete specimen to withstand repeated standard thermal cycles without noticeable damage. Different types of water pressure cause freeze-thaw deterioration of concrete, such as hydraulic and osmotic pressure [1], capillary pressure [2] and other types of water impact according to the existing freeze-thaw resistance theory [3]. Decreasing strength of a construction material is caused by water freezing in it (for example, rock [4]). Water gets into the structure of porous bodies, separates particles and breaks bonds between them [5]. Porosity of a material is a crucial factor for frost resistance and, subsequently, durability [6, 7]. So, the strength of concrete could be represented as a porosity function [8]. In order to determine the composition of concrete mix, it is necessary to take into account freeze-thaw resistance.
1. Scope and Objectives of Project
International experience offers some test methods to determine durability of concrete by freeze-thaw damage, such as Slab test [9], CDF [10], CIF-Test [11] and Cube-Test [12]. These test methods include the following steps: curing and preparing specimens, pre-saturation of specimens and their thermal cycling. The test liquid simulates a deicing agent and contains 3 % of NaCl weight and 97 % of (demineralized) water weight in case of the freeze-thaw test and deicing salt resistance and demineralized water to test the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete respectively. Scaling of specimens is measured after a well defined number of freeze-thaw cycles and resistance of the tested concrete against freeze-thaw damage is evaluated. Test methods, however, vary in terms of their procedures and conditions. Moreover, the CIF test determines internal damage by measuring the relative dynamic modulus of elasticity (by taking into account ultrasonic transit time) [13]. In addition, there are some models of labor concrete damage due to cyclic freezing and thawing, for example, interaction of load and freeze-thaw cycles with chloride exposure regime on surface scaling of concrete and internal cracking process [14].
There are two different standard types of methods to determine freeze-thaw resistance of concrete: basic one [15] and reference one [16] in the Russian Federation.
Pertseva O.N., Nikolskiy S.G. Optional reference method to determine frost resistance of concrete 71
If freeze-thaw resistance of concrete is evaluated by the basic method, a considerable random dispersion of values of concrete strength (variation coefficient p = 15 ... 20 %) [17] under invariable conditions of production and tests of specimens gives rise to a wide range of average values of strength, which requires a large volume test (quantity of test pieces 25 ... 50) as a proof that relative decreasing in strength of AR/R = 0,05 ... 0,15 occurs as a result of freezing and defrosting.
Therefore, basic methods have two main weaknesses: high labour input and low operability. Determination of freeze-thaw resistance by basic methods takes long-term intervals (from 1 to 6 months), so reference methods are necessary.
One of the existing reference methods is the Dilatometric rapid method to determine freeze-thaw resistance of concrete [16]. This method is a prototype of the method which has been suggested by us. In this method freeze-thaw resistance of concrete is determined by the maximum relative difference of volume deformations of the tested concrete and standard specimens in accordance with the tables provided in a standard specification [15], which take into account the type of concrete, its form and size of specimens.
However, results from the tables provided in the federal standard specification are acceptable only for Portland cement concrete and slag Portland cement concrete without surface-active additives (PEAHENS). Today such types of concrete are used extremely seldom. Now a lot of new types of concrete are investigated, tested and used, for example, nano-modified concrete [18, 19, 20], high-strength concrete [21, 22], concrete on the basis of fine-grained dry powder mixes [23], concrete with recycled concrete aggregates [24], etc. In order to obtain new tables, long labour-consuming experiences, which imply using basic methods, are needed [25, 26]
This project is aimed at elaborating techniques to determine freeze-thaw resistance of concrete rapidly, decrease labour input and increase operability.
2. Suggested Method to Determine Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Concrete
A solution has been suggested which belongs to test methods of porous water-saturated bodies and is intended to define the type of concrete in terms of freeze-thaw resistance. The main goal has been reached in the prototype by producing a series of specimens from concrete mix and specimens sated with water, measure specimens, and freezing them down to the standard temperature. The suggested method includes the following important steps:
• measurement of relative tension set of a specimen ©ten after one cycle of freezing and defrosting by dilatometer (a D0D-100-K dilatometer was used);
• measurement of the biggest nondestructive loading L0 of a specimen under stretching by acoustic methods for nondestructive testing of concrete [12] (an AF-15 AE-complex by Kishenevskiy was used) to determine the specimen's long-term strength Rit under stretching;
• measurement of the short-term strength R.
At present, the concept of the biggest non-destructive loading L0 is usefully employed for express-monitoring of different kinds of long-term resistance, such as durability (mechanical and exegetical, remaining life of the product, longevity [27, 28], freeze-thaw resistance [29], cracking resistance, erosion behaviour [30], corrosion [31] and time-dependent deformation [32].
The damage of concrete that occurs during freezing is explained by subcritical cracks growth. In brittle solids, cracks start growing due to a shearing action [33] and they develop at a speed of no more than 10-4 m/s [30, 34]. Therefore, in the conditions of freezing water, the filled crack in concrete captures the nearby closed pores. It stabilizes pressure in the water of the filled crack by about the value causing tensile stress in the material which equals to the long-term strength of a specimen under stretching [30]. If the temperature of the body changes from 78 K to 1493 K and the loading is the same as described above, the L0 value shifts inside its deviation determination, i.e. 1^3 %. This fact allows using the L0 value obtained at a low temperature when the energy per unit of the specimen's volume that is disseminated in the course of freezing-defrosting is defined.
If L0 is determined, it is possible to calculate the long-term strength R|t of the specimen in the conditions of stretching:
2 L
R = n, (1)
nS
where S is the area of a specimen's section perpendicular to compression planes; L0 is the biggest non-destructive loading of a specimen under stretching.
Definition of a relative tension set and long-time strength of a specimen allows evaluating the energy disseminated in the processes of destruction during Wtc freezing-defrosting by formula:
W=0tnR, (2)
where ©ten is a relative tension set of a specimen;
Rit is a long-term strength of a specimen under stretching.
Loading of a specimen in the conditions of monoaxial compression under extreme loadings, registration of these values of axial loadings and axial strain correspond to the loads that allow calculating energy per unit of the specimen's volume disseminated in the course of its compression under extreme loadings by numerical integration of dependence of axial loading on axial strain. The value of the energy disseminated in the unit of volume of a specimen under compression under extreme loads is in proportion to the square value of the short-term strength [35]:
W/«m = aR, (3)
where R is a short-term strength; a is a proportionality coefficient.
The logarithmation and differentiation of expression (3) allow calculating the specimen's freeze-thaw resistance Fsam by formula:
Fsam = 2[AR / R] • ^ , (4)
where [AR/R] is a standard relative decreasing in terms of strength ([AR/R] = 0,05 ... 0,15 [4]); freeze-thaw resistance of concrete is found as average values of freeze-thaw resistance for specimens.
3. Implementation of the Method Suggested
This method is implemented as follows. First, specimens are made in the form of cylinders or cubes with edges of 10 cm from concrete mix of the demanded structure. After that curing specimens are sated with water, and measured. Further, the biggest non-destructive loading of L0 is defined for each specimen by non-destructive testing, for example, an acoustic emission method [36]. Without outreaching L0, cracking of a specimen does not develop yet in the conditions of stretching. Rlt is calculated by formula (1). After the specimen is frozen and defrosted up to the standard temperatures and definition ©ten it is possible to calculate Wtc by formula (2).
Further, a specimen is squeezed in the conditions of monoaxial compression under extreme loadings, and current values of the axial loading and relative tension corresponding to a specimen are registered. Freeze-thaw resistance for a Fsam concrete specimen is calculated according to the received results by formula (4). Freeze-thaw resistance of concrete is found as an average value of freeze-thaw resistance for specimens. The confidential interval of freeze-thaw resistance of concrete is calculated according to dispersion of values of freeze-thaw resistance for a series of specimens.
In particular, this technique was implemented on 10 specimen cubes with the edge of 10 cm, aged 88 days and made of concrete mix of the following structure: Brand 400-1 Portland cement weight part, sand - 2 weight parts, granite rubble 5 ... 20 mm - 4.5 weight parts, waters - 0.6 weight parts. It is experimentally defined in two different ways for this concrete aged 88 days that after 105 freezing-defrosting cycles corresponding to this concrete type in terms of freeze-thaw resistance, the average relative decrease in strength makes 0.142 on a way [30] and 0.16 on the basic way [15], that both values lie within an error of the used ways. On average, relative decrease in strength amounts to 15 %.
Specimens were sated with water according to the item's federal standard specification, measured and registered volume. For each cube sated with water, splitting according to the item value of the biggest nondestructive load (without which excess of a crack in a specimen which has not developed yet is irreversible) has been defined. After each test the plane of compression of a specimen was changed for the perpendicular plane to previous compression. Definition of the greatest nondestructive loading is carried out by means of an acoustic emission way [37] with the use of an AF-15 AE-complex by Kishenevskiy. Acoustic sensors with the frequency of 20-200 kHz were installed on the edge of a specimen, parallel to the plane of compression. In order to create an axial loading, a hydraulic press was used. The value of the long-term strength of a specimen in stretching was defined by the received value of the greatest nondestructive loading corresponding to it. Then the average value of the long-term strength was defined, too. The results of calculation are given in the table. Pertseva O.N., Nikolskiy S.G. Optional reference method to determine frost resistance of concrete
Water-saturated specimens were placed in the measuring camera of a DOD-100-K differential volume dilatometer and tested according to the standard [17]. According to the dependency diagrams of differences, relative volume tension set of a concrete and aluminum specimen was calculated. Energy per unit of specimen's volume disseminated in freezing-defrosting is defined by formula (2) for each specimen.
Further average value of long-term strength of the specimen being stretched was defined as arithmetic average Rit of long-term strength values in the conditions of stretching.
Axial compression of specimens at the speed of 400 kg/sec was carried out on a hydraulic press equipped with the graph plotter of dependence of axial loading on axial strain. By the dependence received on the graph plotter the area under it was determined, i.e. the energy disseminated per volume of a specimen in the course of its compression under extreme loads was received.
Then for each brand of a concrete specimen freeze-thaw resistance values were calculated, (table) as the number of freezing defrosting necessary to decrease its strength by 15 % is defined by formula (4).
Further, the average F15 for values of ^15^, and average square deviation of results of experience were calculated:
S = VZ (F15i - F)2 (5)
3 ,
where S is an average square deviation of the experience results;
F15i is specimen concrete value in terms of freeze-thaw resistance at decreasing short-term strength of
the specimen under compression by 15% was received in the suggested way; where i is changed from 1 to 10;
F15 is freeze-thaw resistance of concrete equal to the arithmetic mean value of freeze-thaw resistance for a series of concrete specimens at decreasing their short-term strength under compression by 15 %.
The average square deviation of F15i values is equal to 16. Considering this, the divergence of the freeze-thaw resistance average value of concrete is considered to be 99.7 and the earlier experimentally found number of cycles is 105 (F15 brand) which is necessary to decrease R by 15 %. It is possible to consider these data casual, and the suggested way is correct.
Table. Definition of the type of concrete in terms of the freeze-thaw resistance according to the suggested method
№ FRtt ,MPa -104 Wtc -104, MPa W -104, MPa com ' [W] -102 , MPa ^5/
1 1,5 2,7 4,05 0,9990 2,997 74
2 1,7 3,1 5,27 1,7215 5,165 98
3 1,8 1,8 3,24 1,2312 3,694 114
4 1,9 2,6 4,90 1,6796 5,039 102
5 2,0 2,5 5,00 1,4333 4,300 86
6 2,1 1,9 4,00 1,4364 4,309 108
7 2,2 2,6 5,72 2,2308 6,692 117
8 2,3 2,1 4,83 1,3846 4,154 86
9 2,9 1,8 5,22 1,6008 4,802 92
10 3,1 1,5 4,65 1,8600 0,558 120
Average 2,15 2,1 4,69 1,5577 99,7
Conclusions
The suggested technique extends a list of technical means for the rapid method to determine freeze-thaw resistance of concrete. Duration of determining the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete is caused by a long time of the specimen's water saturation (4 days according to standard specification [17]). At present, there is a pending patent application for the suggested method. Detailed research and pilot experimental studies are necessary to get more data and create a new method to determine the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete in the future.
References
1. R0nning T.F. Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Concrete Effect of Curing Conditions, Moisture Exchange and Material. Thesis of a doctoral dissertation. Norway, 2001. 416 p.
2. Davie C.T., Pearce C.J., Bicanic N. Effects of Fluid Transport on the Structural Integrity of Concrete Nuclear Pressure Vessel. Proceeding of the 13 ACME conference: University of Sheffield, 21-22 march. UK, 2005. Pp. 46-49.
3. Gorchakov G.I., Kapkin M.M., Skramtaev B.G. Povyshenie morozostoykosti betona v konstruktsiyakh promyshlennykh i gidrotehnikheskikh sooruzheniy [Increasing of frost resistance of concrete in industrial and hydraulic engineering constructions]. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1965. 195 p. (rus)
4. Kurilko A.S., Novopashin M.D. Ob osobennostyakh vliyaniya nizkoy temperatury na prochnost vmeshchayushchikh porod kimberlita trubki "Udachnaya" [Features of Low Temperature Effect upon Strength of Enclosing Rock and Kimberlite in the "Udachnaya" Pipe]. Journal of Mining Science. 2005. No. 2. Pp. 32-36. (rus)
5. Cherepanov V.I, Nekrasova E.V, Chernyh N.A, Panchenko Yu.F. Vodostoykost silikatnogo kirpicha [Water resistance of silicate brick]. Construction Materials. 2013. No. 9. Pp. 10-12. (rus)
6. Shashank B. Strain variations in concrete subjected to cyclic freezing and thawing. Thesis Submitted to University of Tokyo Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo, 2004. 156 p.
7. Shanshan J., Jinxi Z., Baoshan H. Fractal analysis of effect of air void on freeze-thaw resistance of concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2013. No.47. Pp. 126-130.
8. Nesvetaev G.V., Kardumjan G.S. Prochnost tsementnogo kamnya s superplastifikatorami i organomineralnymi modifikatorami s uchetom ego sobstvennykh deformatsiy pri tverdenii [Strength of cement paste with superplasticizer and organic modifiers with its own strain hardening]. Beton i zhelezobeton. 2013. No.5. Pp. 6-8. (rus)
9. Swedish Standard. Concrete testing - Hardened Concrete-Frost Resistance, SS 137244, Sweden, 2005.
10. RILEM Technical Committee. TDC, CDF Test, Test Method for the Freeze-Thaw-Resistance of concrete with sodium chloride solution, RILEM TC 117-FDC Recommendation, Germany, 2001. 27p.
11. RILEM Technical Committee. TDC, CIF Test, Test Method of frost resistance of concrete, RILEM TC 176 Recommendation, Germany, 2004. 17p.
12. Bunke, N. Prüfung von Beton - Empfehlungen und Hinweise als Ergänzung zu DIN 1048, Schriftenreihe. Deutschen Ausschusses für Stahlbeton. 1991. No.422. Pp. 12-15.
13. Gehlen C. Compilation of Test Methods to Determine Durability of concrete. Critical review RILEM Technical Committee TDC, 2011. 11 p.
14. Kosior-kazberuk M. Variation in fracture energy of concrete subjected to cycling freezing and thawing. Arhives of civil and mechanical engineering. 2013. Vol. 13(2). Pp. 254-259.
15. GOST 10060.1-95. Concretes. Basic method for the determination of frost-resistance [Betony. Bazovyye metody opredeleniya morozostoykosti]. 1995. (rus)
16. GOST 10060.3-95. Concretes. Dilatometric rapid method for the determination of frost-resistance [Betony. Dilatometricheskiy metod opredeleniya morozostoykosti]. 1995. (rus)
17. GOST 10060.0-95. Concretes. Methods for the determinationof frost-resistance. General requirements [Betony. Metody dlya opredeleniya morozostoykosti betona. Osnovnyye polozheniya]. 1995. (rus)
18. Toturbiev A.B., Cherkashin V.I., Macapulin V.U., Toturbiev B.D. Zharostoykiy beton na mestnom prirodnom nanodispersnom kremnezemistom syrye [Heat-resistant concrete based on local natural siliceous nanodispersed raw]. Beton i Zhelezobeton. 2013. No. 6. Pp. 2-5. (rus)
19. Kiski S.S., Ageev I.V., Ponomarev A.N., Kozeev A.A., Judovich M.E. Issledovaniye vozmozhnosti modifikatsii karbosilatnykh plastifikatorov v sostave modifitsirovannykh melkozernistykh betonnykh smesey [Study the possibility of modifying the carbonate plasticizers as part of modified fine concrete mixtures]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2012. No. 8(34). Pp. 42-46. (rus)
20. Ponomarev A.N. Nanobeton: kontseptsiya i problemy. Sinergizm nanostrukturirovaniya tsementnykh vyazhushchikh i armiruyushchey fibry [Nanoconcrete - concept and prospects. Synergism of nanostructuring cement binders and reinforcing fibre]. Construction Materials. 2006. No. 7. Pp. 69-71. (rus)
21. Klyuyev S.V. Vysokoprochnyy fibrobeton dlya promyshlennogo i grazhdanskogo stroitelstva [High-strength fiber concrete for industrial and civil construction]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2012. No. 8(34). Pp. 61-66. (rus)
Pertseva O.N., Nikolskiy S.G. Optional reference method to determine frost resistance of concrete 75
22. Barabanshchikov Yu.G., Semenov K.V. O povyshenii plastichnosti betonnykh smesey v gidrotekhnicheskom stroitelstve [Increasing the plasticity of concrete mixes in hydrotechnical construction]. Power Technology and Engineering. 2007. No. 5. Pp. 24-28. (rus)
23. Kalashnikov V.I., Tarakanov O.V., Kusnetsov Y.S., Volodin V.M., Belyakova E.A. Betony novogo pokoleniya na osnove sukhikh tonkozernisto-poroshkovykh smesey [Next generation concrete on the basis of fine-grained dry powder mixes]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2012. No. 8(34). Pp. 47-53. (rus)
24. Gokce A., Nagataki C., Saeki T., Hisada M. Identification of frost-susceptible recycled concrete aggregates for durability of concrete. Construction and building material. 2011. No. 25(5). Pp. 2426-2431.
25. Alekseyev A.V., Dikun A.D., Fishman V.Ya., Dikun V.N. Opyt ekspressnogo opredeleniya morozostoykosti betona transportnykh sooruzheniy [Experience of rapid determination of frost resistance of concrete transport facilities]. Construction Materials. 2005. No. 8. Pp. 55-58. (rus)
26. Dikun A.D. Fishman V.Ya., Dikun V.N., Nagornyak I.N. Razvitiye otechestvennogo dilatometricheskogo metoda prognozirovaniiya svoystv betona [Development of domestic dilatometric method for predicting the properties of concrete]. Construction Materials. 2004. No. 4. Pp. 52-56. (rus)
27. Nikolskaya T.S. Ispolzovaniye akusticheskoy emissii dlya prognozirovaniya dolgovechnosti izdeliya [Use of acoustic emission to predict product life]. Materialy IV mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Nauchno-tekhnicheskiye problemy prognozirovaniya nadezhnosti i dolgovechnosti konstruktsiy i metody ikh resheniya» [Proceeding of the IV international conference " Scientific and technical problems of predicting the reliability and durability of the structures and methods of solving them"]. 14-17 October 2009. Saint-Petersburg: SPbGPU, 2003. Pp. 135-139 (rus)
28. Nikolskaya T.S. Osobennosti akusticheskoy emissii pri chastichnoy razgruzke keramicheskogo izdeliya [Particularities of Acoustic Emission in Ceramic Product under Partial Uploading]. Problems of Strength. 2002. No.4(458), Pp. 140-147. (rus)
29. Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G., Akimov S.V. Sposob opredeleniya morozostoykosti kamnya [A method for determining frost resistance of stone]. Patent RU 2380681, No. 2008129206/28; patent July 1, 2008; piblished January 21, 2010. (rus)
30. Nikolskiy S.G. Ekspress-kontrol erozii betona [Express concrete erosion control]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2008. No.2. Pp. 39-44. (rus)
31. Barabanshchikov Yu.G., Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G., Alyakrinskiy D.M. Sposob otsenki stoykosti izdeliy pri nagruzhenii [Method of estimating resistance of products during loading]. Patent RU 2449266, No. 2010146526/28; patent November 15, 2010; published: April 27, 2012. (rus)
32. Belyayeva S.V., Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G., Kazymov I.M. Sposob otsenki korrozionnoy stoykosti betonnykh izdeliy [Method of estimating corrosion resistance of concrete products]. Patent RU 2442134, No. 2010144958/28; patent. November 2, 2010; published February 10, 2012. (rus)
33. Nikolskiy S.G. Fracture Surface Analysis of Ceramic Bare under Short- and Long-term Bending [Analiz izlomov keramicheskikh sterzhney pri kratkovremennom i dlitelnom izgibe]. Problems of Strength. 2002. No.5. Pp. 133-140. (rus)
34. Nikolskiy S.G. Acoustic emission control of strength [Akustiko-emissionnyy kontrol prochnosti keramicheskikh paneley dlya sten]. Problems of Strength. 1990. No. 2. Pp. 102-106. (rus)
35. Ahverdev I.N. Osnovy fiziki betona [Fundamentals of physics of concrete]. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1981. 425 p. (rus)
36. Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G., Terentiev V.P. Ekspress-metody otsenki dlitelnoy stoykosti betona [Rapid methods for assessing long-term durability of concrete]. Sb. dokladov III mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Populyarnoye betonovedeniye - 2009» [Collection of the III International Conference "Popular concrete -2009"]. 27 February-23 March 2009. Saint-Petersburg, 2009. Pp.35-44. (rus)
37. Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G. Akusticheskaya emissiya pri erozii melkozernistogo betona [Acoustic emission in the erosion of fine-grained concrete]. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. 2008. No. 63. Pp. 243-248. (rus)
Olga N. Pertseva, St.-Petersburg, Russia +79531711053; e-mail: [email protected] Sergey G. Nikolskiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia +79214235776; e-mail: [email protected]
© Pertseva O.N., Nikolskiy S.G., 2014
doi: 10.5862/MCE.47.8
Optional reference method to determine frost resistance of concrete
Undergraduate O.N. Pertseva
Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
+79531711053; e-mail: [email protected] Dr.tech.sci., Professor S.G. Nilolskiy Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
+79214235776; e-mail: [email protected]
Key words
frost resistance; concrete; long-term strength; dilatometric method; non-destructive loading; acoustic issue; relative tension set; durability of concrete
Abstract
The main purpose of this research is to create the new reference method to determine the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete that is characterized by small labor inputs, high efficiency and a wide scope application. The offered method is based on the measurement of long strength by a nondestructive method.
During this research, the theoretical analysis of concrete specimen dependence on freeze-thaw resistance and energy, which is emitted by a specimen during destruction, has been carried out. Freezethaw resistance of a specimen is calculated as the mathematical relation of these energies, and the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete is calculated as an arithmetic mean across specimens.
Correctness of the offered method is proved by experiments. The offered method doesn't demand long tests. It is highly efficient and has a wide scope, but special further laboratory test duration is needed.
References
1. R0nning T.F. Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Concrete Effect of Curing Conditions, Moisture Exchange and Material. Thesis of a doctoral dissertation. Norway, 2001. 416 p.
2. Davie C.T., Pearce C.J., Bicanic N. Effects of Fluid Transport on the Structural Integrity of Concrete Nuclear Pressure Vessel. Proceeding of the 13 ACME conference: University of Sheffield, 21-22 march. UK, 2005. Pp. 46-49.
3. Gorchakov G.I., Kapkin M.M., Skramtaev B.G. Povyshenie morozostoykosti betona v konstruktsiyakh promyshlennykh i gidrotehnikheskikh sooruzheniy [Increasing of frost resistance of concrete in industrial and hydraulic engineering constructions]. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1965. 195 p. (rus)
4. Kurilko A.S., Novopashin M.D. Ob osobennostyakh vliyaniya nizkoy temperatury na prochnost vmeshchayushchikh porod kimberlita trubki "Udachnaya" [Features of Low Temperature Effect upon Strength of Enclosing Rock and Kimberlite in the "Udachnaya" Pipe]. Journal of Mining Science. 2005. No. 2. Pp. 32-36. (rus)
5. Cherepanov V.I, Nekrasova E.V, Chernyh N.A, Panchenko Yu.F. Vodostoykost silikatnogo kirpicha [Water resistance of silicate brick]. Construction Materials. 2013. No. 9. Pp. 10-12. (rus)
6. Shashank B. Strain variations in concrete subjected to cyclic freezing and thawing. Thesis Submitted to University of Tokyo Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo, 2004. 156 p.
7. Shanshan J., Jinxi Z., Baoshan H. Fractal analysis of effect of air void on freeze-thaw resistance of concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2013. No.47. Pp. 126-130.
8. Nesvetaev G.V., Kardumjan G.S. Prochnost tsementnogo kamnya s superplastifikatorami I organomineralnymi modifikatorami s uchetom ego sobstvennykh deformatsiy pri tverdenii [Strength of cement paste with superplasticizer and organic modifiers with its own strain hardening]. Beton I zhelezobeton. 2013. No.5. Pp. 6-8. (rus)
9. Swedish Standard. Concrete testing - Hardened Concrete-Frost Resistance, SS 137244, Sweden, 2005.
10. RILEM Technical Committee. TDC, CDF Test, Test Method for the Freeze-Thaw-Resistance of concrete with sodium chloride solution, RILEM TC 117-FDC Recommendation, Germany, 2001. 27p.
11. RILEM Technical Committee. TDC, CIF Test, Test Method of frost resistance of concrete, RILEM TC 176 Recommendation, Germany, 2004. 17p.
12. Bunke, N. Prüfung von Beton - Empfehlungen und Hinweise als Ergänzung zu DIN 1048, Schriftenreihe. Deutschen Ausschusses für Stahlbeton. 1991. No.422. Pp. 12-15.
13. Gehlen C. Compilation of Test Methods to Determine Durability of concrete. Critical review RILEM Technical Committee TDC, 2011. 11 p.
14. Kosior-kazberuk M. Variation in fracture energy of concrete subjected to cycling freezing and thawing. Arhives of civil and mechanical engineering. 2013. Vol. 13(2). Pp. 254-259.
15. GOST 10060.1-95. Concretes. Basic method for the determination of frost-resistance [Betony. Bazovyye metody opredeleniya morozostoykosti]. 1995. (rus)
16. GOST 10060.3-95. Concretes. Dilatometric rapid method for the determination of frost-resistance [Betony. Dilatometricheskiy metod opredeleniya morozostoykosti]. 1995. (rus)
17. GOST 10060.0-95. Concretes. Methods for the determinationof frost-resistance. General requirements [Betony. Metody dlya opredeleniya morozostoykosti betona. Osnovnyye polozheniya]. 1995. (rus)
18. Toturbiev A.B., Cherkashin V.l., Macapulin V.U., Toturbiev B.D. Zharostoykiy beton na mestnom prirodnom nanodispersnom kremnezemistom syrye [Heat-resistant concrete based on local natural siliceous nanodispersed raw]. Beton i Zhelezobeton. 2013. No. 6. Pp. 2-5. (rus)
19. Kiski S.S., Ageev I.V., Ponomarev A.N., Kozeev A.A., Judovich M.E. Issledovaniye vozmozhnosti modifikatsii karbosilatnykh plastifikatorov v sostave modifitsirovannykh melkozernistykh betonnykh smesey [Study the possibility of modifying the carbonate plasticizers as part of modified fine concrete mixtures]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2012. No. 8(34). Pp. 42-46. (rus)
20. Ponomarev A.N. Nanobeton: kontseptsiya i problemy. Sinergizm nanostrukturirovaniya tsementnykh vyazhushchikh i armiruyushchey fibry [Nanoconcrete - concept and prospects. Synergism of nanostructuring cement binders and reinforcing fibre]. Construction Materials. 2006. No. 7. Pp. 69-71. (rus)
21. Klyuyev S.V. Vysokoprochnyy fibrobeton dlya promyshlennogo i grazhdanskogo stroitelstva [High-strength fiber concrete for industrial and civil construction]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2012. No. 8(34). Pp. 6166. (rus)
22. Barabanshchikov Yu.G., Semenov K.V. O povyshenii plastichnosti betonnykh smesey v gidrotekhnicheskom stroitelstve [Increasing the plasticity of concrete mixes in hydrotechnical construction]. Power Technology and Engineering. 2007. No. 5. Pp. 24-28. (rus)
23. Kalashnikov V.I., Tarakanov O.V., Kusnetsov Y.S., Volodin V.M., Belyakova E.A. Betony novogo pokoleniya na osnove sukhikh tonkozernisto-poroshkovykh smesey [Next generation concrete on the basis of fine-grained dry powder mixes]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2012. No. 8(34). Pp. 47-53. (rus)
24. Gokce А., Nagataki С., Saeki Т., Hisada М. Identification of frost-susceptible recycled concrete aggregates for durability of concrete. Construction and building material. 2011. No. 25(5). Pp. 2426-2431.
25. Alekseyev A.V., Dikun A.D., Fishman V.Ya., Dikun V.N. Opyt ekspressnogo opredeleniya morozostoykosti betona transportnykh sooruzheniy [Experience of rapid determination of frost resistance of concrete transport facilities]. Construction Materials. 2005. No. 8. Pp. 55-58. (rus)
26. Dikun A.D. Fishman V.Ya., Dikun V.N., Nagornyak I.N. Razvitiye otechestvennogo dilatometricheskogo metoda prognozirovaniiya svoystv betona [Development of domestic dilatometric method for predicting the properties of concrete]. Construction Materials. 2004. No. 4. Pp. 52-56. (rus)
27. Nikolskaya T.S. Ispolzovaniye akusticheskoy emissii dlya prognozirovaniya dolgovechnosti izdeliya [Use of acoustic emission to predict product life]. Materialy IV mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Nauchnotekhnicheskiye problemy prognozirovaniya nadezhnosti i dolgovechnosti konstruktsiy i metody ikh resheniya» [Proceeding of the IV international conference "Scientific and technical problems of predicting the reliability and durability of the structures and methods of solving them"]. 14-17 October 2009. Saint- Petersburg: SPbGPU, 2003. Рр. 135-139 (rus)
28. Nikolskaya T.S. Osobennosti akusticheskoy emissii pri chastichnoy razgruzke keramicheskogo izdeliya [Particularities of Acoustic Emission in Ceramic Product under Partial Uploading]. Problems of Strength. 2002. No.4(458), Pp. 140-147. (rus)
29. Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G., Akimov S.V. Sposob opredeleniya morozostoykosti kamnya [A method for determining frost resistance of stone]. Patent RU 2380681, No. 2008129206/28; patent July 1, 2008; piblished January 21, 2010. (rus)
30. Nikolskiy S.G. Ekspress-kontrol erozii betona [Express concrete erosion control]. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2008. No.2. Pp. 39-44. (rus)
31. Barabanshchikov Yu.G., Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G., Alyakrinskiy D.M. Sposob otsenki stoykosti izdeliy pri nagruzhenii [Method of estimating resistance of products during loading]. Patent RU 2449266, No. 2010146526/28; patent November 15, 2010; published: April 27, 2012. (rus)
32. Belyayeva S.V., Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G., Kazymov I.M. Sposob otsenki korrozionnoy stoykosti betonnykh izdeliy [Method of estimating corrosion resistance of concrete products]. Patent RU 2442134, No. 2010144958/28; patent. November 2, 2010; published February 10, 2012. (rus)
33. Nikolskiy S.G. Fracture Surface Analysis of Ceramic Bare under Short- and Long-term Bending [Analiz izlomov keramicheskikh sterzhney pri kratkovremennom i dlitelnom izgibe]. Problems of Strength. 2002. No.5. Pp. 133-140. (rus)
34. Nikolskiy S.G. Acoustic emission control of strength [Akustiko-emissionnyy kontrol prochnosti keramicheskikh paneley dlya sten]. Problems of Strength. 1990. No. 2. Pp. 102-106. (rus)
35. Ahverdev I.N. Osnovy fiziki betona [Fundamentals of physics of concrete]. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1981. 425 p. (rus)
36. Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G., Terentiev V.P. Ekspress-metody otsenki dlitelnoy stoykosti betona [Rapid methods for assessing long-term durability of concrete]. Sb. dokladov III mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Populyarnoye betonovedeniye - 2009» [Collection of the III International Conference "Popular concrete -2009"]. 27 February-23 March 2009. Saint-Petersburg, 2009. Pp.35-44. (rus)
37. Nikolskaya T.S., Nikolskiy S.G. Akusticheskaya emissiya pri erozii melkozernistogo betona [Acoustic emission in the erosion of fine-grained concrete]. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. 2008. No. 63. Pp. 243-248. (rus)
Full text of this article in Russian: pp. 71-76