CC BY
39
_CHEMICAL PROBLEMS 2019 no. 4 (17) ISSN 2221-8688_535^
UDC 541.136
OPTIMIZATION OF A REVERSIBLE FUEL CELL OXYGEN ELECTRODE COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE
A.A. Kalinnikov1 , I.V. Pushkareva12, V.I. Porembskii1 , A.S. Pushkarev12, M.V. Kozlova12, S.A. Grigoriev12, S.V. Ostrovskii1, V.N. Fateev1, A.Sh.Aliyev3
1National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute " 123182, Moscow, pl. AcademikaKurchatova, 1 2National Research University "Moscow Power Engineering Institute" 111250, Moscow, Krasnokazarmennayast., 14 e-mail: [email protected] 3Institute of Catalysis and Inorganic Chemistry named after Acad.M.Nagiyev H.Javidave., 113, Baku AZ1143, Azerbaijan Republic e-mail: [email protected]
Received 31.08.2019
Abstract:The optimization of the structure and composition of the oxygen electrode catalytic layer in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) unitized regenerative fuel cell (URFC) is described. The theoretical model described the transfer processes in catalytic layer is modified which allows to consider the Pt and Ir content influence on the catalytic layer performance at different URFC operating modes. The model calculations are verified through the URFCcell testing.
Keywords:reversible fuel cell, polymer electrolyte membrane, catalytic layer, oxygen electrode DOI: 10.32737/2221-8688-2019-4-535-545
Introduction
Unitized regenerative fuel cell (URFC) catalysts were studied.
is an electrochemical device which may operate as both fuel cell giving the power supply and electrolyzer generating hydrogen for energy storage. Power generation system based on polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) URFC is characterized by high power and energy density and low cost in comparison with the system based on separate fuel cell and electrolyzer and could provide the longterm energy storage (in comparison with typical batteries) as well [1,2].
One of the most important part of the URFC is the oxygen electrode (different from PEM fuel cell cathode and electrolyzer anode) on which surface both oxygen reduction (ORR) and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) take place. Different catalysts and catalytic layers are applied to ORR and OER thus the optimization of the URFC oxygen electrode is of great importance. Great attention has paid to a searching of new mixed electrocatalysts based on Pt, Ru, Os, Ir, Rh etc. For example, in ref. [3] more than 750 mixed
From the other hand the model development as an optimization aspect is of great importance as well. The presented research is related to such a theoretical model development.
URFCmodel
Numerical studies of the oxygen electrode (OE) and its catalytic layer (CL) based on the Pt-Ir blacks mixture catalyst (Pt-Ir) were performed using the previously developed models and software [4, 5]. URFC efficiency n0 was evaluated as the relation of URFC voltage in fuel cell mode UFC to the URFC voltage in the electrolyzer mode Uel.
Pt and Ir based catalysts performance in OER and ORR
The performance of the Pt and Ir catalysts could be evaluated using the data given in Table 1. The Tafel slope and exchange current density at different overvoltages in OER and ORR are presented (Table 1).
www.chemprob.org
CHEMICAL PROBLEMS 2019 no. 4 (17)
Table 1. The performance of the PtandIr catalysts in OER and ORR
Catalyst Reaction Overvoltage Tafel slope Exchange current Ref.
Pt ORR <450mv 46mV 2.1-10-3 A m-2 [6]
>450mV 95mV 0.336 A m-2 [6]
Ir <650mV 67mV 1.17-10-3 A m2 [6]
>650mV 90mV 1.28-10-2 A m-2 [6]
Pt ORR >500mV 66mV 5.8-10-2 A m-2 [7]
OER >250mV 150mV 3-10-4 A m-2 [7]
Pt ORR <260mV 35mV 5.110-5 A mg-1Pt [8]
>260mV 60mV 4.5-10-4 A mg-1Pt [8]
OER <550mV 54mV 1.9-10-6 A mg-1 Pt [8]
>550mV 90mV 1.1-10-4 A mg-1 Pt [8]
Ir ORR <400mV 37mV 2.1-10-' A mg-1 Pt [8]
>400mV 70mV 3.34-10-5 A mg-1 Pt [8]
OER <380mV 24mV 6.8-10-8 A mg-1 Pt [8]
>380mV 67mV 4.39-10-4 A mg-1 Pt [8]
Pt OER <500mV 54mV 3.9-10-2A m-2Seom [9]
After the Table 1 data correction (to the same units) the exchange current density varies of ca. 2-3 times at a fixed overvoltage value. According to the literature and experimental data [6 - 9] regarding the electrocatalytic activity of Pt and Ir in OER and ORR the following could be assumed:
1. ORR on Pt and OER on Ir occur according to the mechanism assumed for high overvoltages - >300mV;
2. ORR on Ir and OER on Pt occur according to the mechanism assumed for high overvoltages - >450mV;
3. All electrocatalysts assumed to behave like supported (i.e. TiC) Pt-Ir mixtures
2 -1
with specific surface area of ca. 20 m g
Mathematical modelling
The following assumptions were made during the mathematical formulation of the mass and charge transfer inside the oxygen electrode CL: the CL is homogeneous and mass transfer is limited by the oxygen diffusion in the fuel cell (FC) mode.
The development of the modified oxygen electrode CL transport model was based on the results described in ref. [10]. Equations which describe the charge transfer in the CL in the electrolyzer (EL) mode and the boundary conditions are given below (Eq. 1):
er„— = -L 0 < x < hc
■ r \ ■
dcpp _ . ¿e CO) = ¿0
°v te ~lp ip(.hc) = i0 (1)
tJ = iaPtexp (aapt + iairexp {aaIr^^j(pe (0) = U,
ie + ip = i0 ' E <Pp(hc) = ioR
mem
The equations which describe the the boundary conditions are given below (Eq.
charge transfer in the CL in the FC mode and 2): d(pe _ _.
dx ~ le 0 < x < hc
a ^ = i ie(0) = i0
°p dx rvA-
dip . C0 r ( <Pp-<PA . . ( (Pp~(Pe'\l^P c ~ lo (2)
^ = lcPt ^ iexp lacPt^r) + lcIr exp lttcIr ^r)Jq>e(0) = Ufc (2)
ie + ip = io iPpChc) = ioRmem
=__ÎE_ C0(0) = C00
dx 4FDocl
The coordinate of the CL outer surface is x=0 and the one of the CL with membrane boundary is x=hc.
In equations (1) - (2): 9e,9p - the electron potential in the electron-conducting subsystem and the proton potential in the proton-conducting subsystem of the CL;
ie,ip -the electron current density in the electron-conducting subsystem and the proton current density in the proton-conducting subsystem of the CL;
oe,op - the specific conductivity ofthe electron-conducting subsystem and the proton-conducting subsystem of the CL;
<Pa=^, -Tafel sl°pes
foranodic and cathodic reactions, respectively;
aa,ac - transfer numbersofanodic and cathodic reactions, respectively.
CO0, COc -oxygen concentration at the outer boundary and the inside one of the CL, respectively;
DocL -the efficient oxygen diffusion coefficient of the oxygen in the CL porous media;COref - the value of the comparative oxygen concentration (Coref=8.2mol/m ).
"aPt", cPt","aIr" and cIr" indexes refer to Pt and Ir catalysts, respectively.
The equation systems (1- 2) were solved numerically using the Runge-Kutta method (4th order).
oe [S-m-1] - conductivity of the electronic-conductive subsystem of the CL; ae = ae0(l - Eo)1'5 (3)
whereoeo - effective conductivity of the electronic-conductive subsystem of the CL at zero porosity;
op [S-m-1] - conductivity of the proton-conductive subsystem of the CL;
= °Po(l - eP)1
where op0 - effective conductivity of the polymer electrolyte membrane.
sgc - porosity of the CL taking into consideration the proton-conductive subsystem.
1-s = 1 - Sn - S
ga 0 p
Therefore, the CL effective diffusion coefficient DOCL could be calculated as follows:
Docl = DO0 • (l - Ep - £0) '
Results
The main purpose of calculations is the optimization of Pt and Ir mass loading with respect to the CL geometric surface area in
Ufc
order to maximize the rjn = — = max
10 Uel
criterion.
The analysis of the equations given above shows (Fig. 1) that the addition of less active component has a significant effect on the OE CL performance in both FC and EL modes. Whereby the addition of Pt to the CL leads to the cell voltage decreasing in the EL mode(Fig.1A). From the other hand the addition of Ir leads to the sharp decreasing of the cell voltage in the FC mode (Fig.1A). These trends are associated with two main reasons:
1. The URFC performance is less influenced by mass transfer in the EL mode. When the CL thickness and the Pt loading increasing the water, which is necessary
id discussions
for OER is still effectively supplied to the CL due to the capillary forces. In the FC mode the oxygen diffusion to the CL is slow and sharply decreases when the Pt and/or Ir loading increased. 2. The essential fact is that that the CL ionic resistance growth when the mass loading of Pt and Ir (CL thickness) increases. The CL resistance significantly affected by the layer ionomer(solid polymer electrolyte -Nafion) humidity. The CL water content in the FC mode depends on the air humidity. In the EL mode the ionomer is in contact with liquid water which resulted in 2-3 lower CL resistance value.
The dependence of the URFC efficiency have a maximum value of ca. 0.45 which corresponds to the following noble metal loadings: mPt = 1 mg cm-2 and mir=0.75 mg cm (Fig.1B). But the FC mode is crucial for the URFC efficiency.
2
Specific mass of Pt, mg/cm
2
Specific mass of Pt, mg/cm
Fig.1.The dependency of the URFC voltage in both FC and EL modes (A) and the URFC efficiency (B) from the Pt and Ir loadings in the OE CL. The ionomer volume fraction in the OE
CL is Xpv=0.15. Current density is i =0.5 Acm .
Fig.2 shows the proton current density distribution in the CL, potentials of proton-and electron-conducting subsystems (Fig. 2A), the relative oxygen concentration in the FC mode (Fig. 2B), current density, potentials of proton- and electron-conducting subsystems in EL mode (Fig. 2C) at the optimal no value.
From the other hand the ionomer volume fraction (XpV = 0.24) was chosen in order to induce the significant gradient of the oxygen concentration in CL. In this case the reaction overvoltage suggested to be constant and the reaction rate suggested to beindependent from the CL thickness.
CL coordinate, mkm
Fig. 2. The numerical simulation of the OE CL in both FC and EC modes: proton current density distribution in the CL, the potentials of proton- and electron-conducting subsystems
(A), the relative oxygen concentration in the FC mode
(B), current density, the potential of proton- and electron-conducting subsystems in EL mode (C) in the CL of OE at XpV=0.24, mPt =1 mg cm-2andmîr =0.75 mg cm-2.
Fig. 3 shows the dependence of the URFC performance from the catalysts loading. The URFC current density increasing leads to the shift of URFC efficiency maximum value towards the lower Pt and Ir loading values: mPt = 0.8 mg cm and mIr = 0.25 mg cm . At the increased current density in the FC mode becomes more important for the URFC efficiency.The volume fraction of ionomer in the CL significantly affect the URFC performance in both FC and EL modes (Fig. 4B). This influence is mainly come from the change in the CL proton-conducting subsystem ohmic resistance. A noticeable effect of the oxygen diffusion rate on the
URFC performance begins only at high volume fraction of the ionomer i.e. low free volume (porosity) fraction in the CL. The position and the value of the maximum n0(Fig.4B) depends on the ORR overvoltage and the ohmic resistance of the CL.Maximum URFC efficiency is ca. 0.47 at mPt+mir = 1.3 mg cm and XpV= 0.21). All characteristics and dependencies have the optimal values (minimal voltage in EL mode and the maximum efficiency and voltage in FC mode). When the current density increased the optimal value of the ionomer volume fraction increases because to obtain higher efficiency the higher proton conductivity is required.
2.00
0
1.75 -I
£ 1.50 H o
CT
E
1.25 -
0
w 1.00 1 w
1 0 o 0.75 H o
CD
00 0.50 0
0.25 -
0.00
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
,2
Specific mass of Pt, mg/cm2
2.00
1.75 -
£ 1.50
.O
E 1.25
o
s 1.00 to CO
E
o 0.75
ö CD
« ™ S0.50
0.25 -
0.00
0. 2 0. 4 / 0.Î6 ÏB
/
0.18 \
_____ J>
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
,2
Specific mass of Pt, mg/cm2 Fig. 3.The dependence of the URFC voltage (V) in both FC and EL modes (A) and its efficiency (B) from the Pt and Ir loadings in CL of OE. The ionomer volume fraction in CL is XpV=0.15
and the current density is i =1.0Acm .
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
2
Specific mass of Pt+Ir, mg/cm2
2
Specific mass of Pt+Ir, mg/cm
Fig.4.The dependence of the URFC voltage (V) in both FC and EL modes (A) and its efficiency (B)from the Pt+Ir loading and the ionomer volume fraction in the CL of OE. The Pt/Ir ratio is mPt/mIr =1.5. Currentdensityisi = 0.5 Acm_2.
Experimental model verification
Experimental validation of the proposed model was carried out using the URFC testing cell with the 7 cm2 working area described in ref. [11]. Porous titanium plates and carbon paper Sigraset 10bb with microporoussublayer were used as the current collectors (gas diffusion electrodes) on the oxygen and hydrogen side, respectively. Nafion 115 membrane was used as the polymer electrolyte membrane. Hydrogen electrode CL consists of
Pt40/Vulcan XC-72 catalyst, PTFE (10 wt.%) and Nafionionomer (20 wt.%) with Pt loading of 0.35 mg cm . OE CL consists of TiC supported Pt-Ir catalyst and Nafionionomer (10 wt.%) with Pt+Ir loading of ca. 1.5 mg cm-2. The Pt weight content in OE CL varies in the range of 10 - 100 wt.%.
Fig. 5 shows that the calculated polarization curves of MEAs with different Pt weight content in OE are in a good agreement with those obtained by URFC cell testing.
1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3
0
CT 1 2 CO 12
O >
1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6
0.5
0.0
-r
0.1
0.6
Current density, A/cm2
Fig. 5. Polarization curves of the URFC testing cell (dots) and the results of their numerical modelling (lines). The CL of the OE containsPt+Ir catalysts with different mPt/mirratio (XPt) varied from 0 to 1). Cell temperature is 50 °C Hydrogen and oxygen pressure is 1 bar. The temperature of gas humidification (in FC mode) is 40 °C
The mathematical model of the URFC oxygen electrode catalytic layer was developed. The calculations made using the developed model allows to postulate the following:
1. The ORR exchange currents on Ptisca. 20 times higher than those on Ir. The OER exchange currents on Irisca. 10-40 times higher than those on Pt depending on the overvoltage. The OER Tafel slope in Pt is 1.5 times larger than those on Ir at overvoltages> 450 mVThese catalysts concentration must be optimized for concrete cell operating modes.
2. The maximum URFC efficiency (n0) of ca. 0.45 at the selected current density of 0.5 A cm is obtained at the following catalysts loadings in CL: mPt=1mg cm-2andmir=0.75mg cm-2. The FC mode is the most crucial to obtain a maximum URFC efficiency.
3. The dependence of the OE CL structure (ionomer volume fraction) on the URFC maximum efficiency and conditions was studied. Thevalueofionomervolume fraction in the OE CL significantly affects the URFC performance in both FC and EL modes. This effect is due to the ohmic resistance of
the proton-conductive subsystem and is limited by the oxygen diffusion rate only at very low value of the free volume fraction (porosity) in the CL. The relation of the ORR overvoltage and CL ohmic losses determine the obtained maximum URFC efficiency of ca. 0.47 at mPt+mIr=1.3 mg cm-2and XpV=0.21.
4. When current density increased from 0.1 to 1 A cm-2the optimal value of the ionomer volume fraction increases from 0.15 to 0.22 vol.% due to the strongereffect of CL proton conductivity.
5. Experimental validation of the proposed model of the URFC OE CL charge transfer was carried out using the URFC testing cell with the 7 cm2 working area. The results of calculations are in a good agreement with the experimental data.
The calculated values of URFC efficiency and optimal OE CL composition may be a little bit different for catalysts with another chemical composition and structure. However, the proposed model and performed studies are an example of the URFC OE optimization which is based on the selected catalysts.
Acknowledgement
This research was conducted with financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of RF (unique project identifier RFMEFI60417X0171) in National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", Russia.
References
1. Smith W. The role of fuel cells in energy
storage./. Power Sources. 2000, vol. 86, pp.
74-83.
2.Kulova T.L., Nikolaev I.I., Fateev V.N., AliyevA.Sh. Electrochemical systems of energy accumulation.Chemical Problems. 2018, no.1, pp. 9-34.
3.Reier T., Oezaslan M., Strasser P. Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on Ru, Ir, and Pt catalysts: a comparative study of nanoparticles and bulk materials. ACSCatal..2012, vol. 2, pp.1765-1772.
4. KalinnikovA.A., Grigoriev S.A. Computer program "1d program for studying and
optimization of the Ir and Pt content in electrolyzer catalytic layers "elcatelld", RU
2017611484, 03.02.2017.
5. KalinnikovA.A., Grigoriev S.A. Computer program "Interactive program for calculation and optimization of the air-hydrogen polymer electrolyte fuel cell cathode catalytic layer performance "fccatfeel1d", RU 2015618032, 29.06.2015.
6.Singh R.K., NeergatM. Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) on Ir, Rh, and RuSelenides, European Fuel Cell Forum. 2011 (28 June -1 July 2011), Lucerne, Switzerland.
7. Chen G., Delafuente D.A., Sarangapani S., Mallouk T.E. Combinatorial discovery of
bifunctional oxygen reduction—water oxidation electrocatalysts for regenerative fuel cells. Catal.Today. 2001, vol. 67, pp. 341-355.
8. Fuentes R.E., Colon-Mercado H.R., Martinez-Rodriguez M.J. Pt-
Ir/TiCElectrocatalysts for PEM Fuel Cell/Electrolyzer Process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014, vol. 161, pp. F77-F82. 9.Ollo K., Guillaume P.L.A., Auguste A.F.T., Quand-Meme G.C., Honore K.K., Lassiné. O. Influence of various metallic oxides on the kinetic of the oxygen evolution reaction on platinum electrodes. J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng. 2015, vol. 5, pp. 79-91.
10.Grigoriev S.A., Kalinnikov A.A. Mathematical modeling and experimental study of the performance of PEM water electrolysis cell with different loadings of platinum metals in electrocatalytic layers, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2016, vol. 42, pp. 1590-1597.
11Grigoriev S.A., Millet P., Dzhus K.A., Middleton H., Saetre T.O., Fateev V.N. Design and characterization of bi-functional electrocatalytic layers for application in PEM unitized regenerative fuel cells.Int. J. HydrogenEnergy. 2010, vol. 35, pp. 5070 -5076.
ОПТИМИЗАЦИЯ СОСТАВА И СТРУКТУРЫ КАТАЛИТИЧЕСКОГО СЛОЯ КИСЛОРОДНОГО ЭЛЕКТРОДА ОБРАТИМОГО ТОПЛИВНОГО ЭЛЕМЕНТА
1 12 1 12 Калинников , И.В. Пушкарева ' , В.И. Порембский , А.С. Пушкарев ' , М.В.
12 12 1 1 3
Козлова' , С.А. Григорьев ' , С.В. Островский , В.Н. Фатеев , А.Ш.Алиев
1 Национальный исследовательский центр «Курчатовский институт» 123182, Москва, пл. Академика Курчатова, д.1 Национальный исследовательский университет «МЭИ» 111250, Москва, ул. Красноказарменная, д. 14 Институт катализа и неорганической химии им. акад. М.Нагиева Национальной АН Азербайджана АХ 1143 Баку, пр.Г.Джавида, 113; е-та11:ак1/а11уеу55@таИги
В данной работе рассмотрен вопрос оптимизации структуры и состава каталитического слоя кислородного электрода обратимого топливного элемента на основе твердого полимерного электролита. Разработана модификация теоретической модели транспорта в каталитическом слое кислородного электрода. Результаты расчетов на основе модели позволили установить влияние содержания Pt и 1г на эффективность работы каталитического слоя при различных режимах работы топливного элемента. Проведена экспериментальная верификация модели с использованием лабораторной ячейки топливного элемента, подтверждающая адекватность разработанной модели.
Ключевые слова: обратимый топливный элемент, твердый полимерный электролит,каталитический слой, кислородный электрод
DÖNOR YANACAQELEMENTLORINOKSÍGEN ELEKTRODUNUNKATALÍTÍK TdBdQdSÍMNSTRUKTUR VO TORKÍBÍNÍN OPTÍMALLA§DIRILMASI
A.A. Kalinnikov1, I.V. Pu§kareva 12, V.I. Porebski1, A.S. Pu§karev 12, М. V. Kozlova1'2, S.A. Qriqoryev12, S.V. Ostrovski1, V.N. Fateyev1, A.§. Oliyev3
"Kurgatov institutu " Milli tadqiqat markazi1 123182, Moskva, Akadimik Kurgatov meydani,1
"MEi "Milli tadqiqat universiteti 111250, Moskva, Krasnokazarmennaya küg, 14 AMEA-nin akad. M.Nagiyev adina Kataliz va Qeyri-üzvi Kimya institutu AZ 1143, Baki, H.Cavid pr., 113; e-mail: [email protected]
Maqalada bark polimer elektrolit asasinda dönar yanacaq elementinin oksigen elektrodunun katalitik tabaqasinin struktur va tarkibinin optimalla§dirilmasi masalasina baxilib. Oksigen elektrodunun katalitik tabaqasinda transportun nazari modelinin modifikasiyasi i§lanib hazirlanib. Yanacaq elementinin müxtalif i§ rejiminda model asasinda aparilmi§ hesablamalar Pt va Ir miqdarinin katalitik tabaqanin effektiv i§lamasina tasirini müayyan etmaya imkan verir. Agar sözlw. yanacaq elementi, bark polimer elektroliti, oksigen elektrodu
