CC BY
12Exercise 4. Tell me, how do the words differ in pairs. Think of an offer with each of them. Tourist tourist, geometric - hermetic, precedent - applicant.
Exercise 5. Using the dictionary of foreign words, replace the stressed foreign words in the following sentences by the Russians.[3.55] Explain why such a replacement is necessary. A true stimulus for the activity of each person must be a consciousness of duty and responsibility to the team. Illustrations Perfectly imitate the main episodes of the novel. These innovations are aimed at strengthening the resource base of the commercial bank. Of course, inappropriate use of foreign words is unacceptable. Here, according to L.Krysy, "a systematic and painstaking scientific and educational work" is needed, the ultimate goal of which is the education of a good language taste.[1.7] The good taste is the main condition for the correct and appropriate use of linguistic means, both foreign, borrowed, and its own.
References
1. Krysy L.P. On the vocabulary of the Russian language of ours // Russian languages in school and at home, 2002. № 1. P. 7.
2. Kostomarov V.G. Language taste of the era. St. Petersburg, 1999.
3. Godu I.B. Russian language and culture of speech. Moscow: The Logos, 2003.
METHODS AND FORMS OF VERIFICATION OF THE VERB
Sharipova F.N.
Sharipova Feruza Negmatulloevna - Teacher of the English Language, DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE, FACULTY OF LIGHT INDUSTRY, BUKHARA ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, BUKHARA, REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Abstract: as you know, the linguistic basis of the methodology of teaching the Russian language is the selection and interpretation of grammatical and lexical material, a comparison of the facts of Russian and native languages. In this regard, this article discusses some questions about the word combination, in particular, the subordinate combination of words.
Keywords: secondary, lexical material, formulation, word combination, identify, syntagmatic, component, submission, complex names, subordinate.
As is known, the linguistic basis of the methodology of teaching the Russian language is the selection and interpretation of grammatical and lexical material, a comparison of the facts of Russian and native languages.1 In this connection, it seems necessary to consider some questions about the word combination, in particular, the subordinate combination of words, because on this question Until now there is no generally accepted opinion: there is no unity in the definition of word combinations and the differentiation of their functions. The research of this issue is devoted to the works of many scientists: FF Fortunatov, AA Shakhmatov. A.M. Peshkovsky, N.Peterson, L. A. Bulakhovsky, V.Vinogradov, A.B. Shapiro, V.P. Sukhotin, A.N.Gvozdev, G.N.Prokopovich. EM Galkina-Feroduk, K.Yu. Shvedova and others. They are representatives of various linguistic schools and directions. [1.10-17]
Analyzing the views of linguistic scholars, Nikolai Prokopovich comes to the conclusion: "The phrase (syntagma) occupying an intermediate position between a word and a sentence reveals a familiarity with them, which is why it should be compared with it, while it differs sharply from the first, and from the second and therefore should not be identified, nor mixed with them. To determine the subject of syntax, it is especially important not to allow. blending the word combination with a sentence, from which it differs qualitatively, although it constantly interacts with it. "
Professor N. N. Prokopovich correctly identifies three sections in the syntax: 1) the doctrine of the structure of the sentence as a unit that performs a communicative function and is the carrier of predicatively (predicative unit);
2) the doctrine of the structure of word combinations (compound words or syntagma) as units that do not themselves perform a communicative function and are the carriers of syntagmatic relations (syntagmatic units);
3) the doctrine of the structure of complex syntactic units as units that perform a communicative function and consist of predicative units connected between themselves by syntagmatic relations (syntagmatics of predicative units).
Thus, a review of the literature on word combinations shows that linguists did not come to a common opinion on word combinations and therefore, it is still necessary to continue to work in this direction, since the solution of a whole series of problems in the methodology of teaching the Russian language, in particular, the teaching of prepositional management in a national institution of higher learning, depends on the correct solution of this question in the linguistic plan- (selection of phrases for study, sequence their submission, methodical methods of studying the selected word combinations). So, for example, in the practice of teaching Russian nationalist students to word combinations with subordinate relations of words, the following concepts are of great importance: the idea of N. Prokopovich about the possibility of studying word combinations as "structural", as "different types of complex names," as ways of expressing logical relations (places of time, goals, causes, etc.): [2.14-15] the definition of V.Beloshapkova predicativity and non-predicatively; position K.Yu. Shvedova on the dependence of the structure of word combinations on the categorical properties of the rod word, etc.
The most complete, in our opinion, is the following definition: "A phrase is a syntactic unit formed by the combination of two or more significant words (words and word forms) on the basis of a subordinate grammatical linkage - coordination, control, adjacency - and those relationships that are generated by this relationship . The grammatically dominant word is the core of you (main) component of the word combination, grammatically subordinate word - its dependent (subordinate) component ". In modern linguistics, depending on the nature of the stem word, all the phrases are divided into verbal, adjective and adverbial. To reveal its meaning, the prevailing word requires a certain form of oblique case, name or pronoun with a personal or objective meaning (solve the problem, enter the forest, etc.) as a result of the analysis of numerous cases, weak governance. In the opinion of N.Yu.Shvedova, management is "such a connection of words in which a name depending on a verb, another name or adverb, stands in the form of an oblique case with objective or complex meaning.[3.169] " Herewith, she divides management into strong and weak. She calls strong management "a connection in which, in the case of its non-absolute use, the obligatory presence of a strictly defined controlled form is predetermined with it," and she sees weak governance in those cases when "the possible word, but not necessarily, controlled form, and it is not predetermined as the only possible one. "
References
1. Russian language at the national school. Problems of lingua didactics. Ed. N.M. Shansky.
N.Z. Bakeeva. M.; "Pedagogy", 1977. P. 10-17.
2. Prokopovich N.N. Questions of the syntax of the Russian language. Moscow: "High School",
1974. P. 14-15.
3. Shvedova N.Yu. Active processes in modern Russian syntax. M.: "Enlightenment", 1966.
ВОСПИТАНИЕ МОЛОДЕЖИ В ДУХЕ НРАВСТВЕННОЙ ЭТИКИ
Каххорова Ш.Ш.
Каххорова Шахло Шайдуллоевна — преподаватель, кафедра английского языка, факультет легкой промышленности, Бухарский инженерно-технологический институт, г. Бухара, Республика Узбекистан
Аннотация: в этой статье рассматривается воспитание молодого поколения в Узбекистане. В статье говорится о значении моральных, морально-правовых, экономических и политических знаний. Также в статье подчеркивается категория нравственных и этических ценностей для воспитания молодого поколения.
Ключевые слова: духовность, просвещение, воспитание, этика, менталитет, справедливое общество.
Одним из основных вопросов является воспитание молодого поколения как зрелого человека, лидера своей страны. Потому что именно молодежь - будущее нашего государства [1].
Усиление и развитие духовности народа является важнейшей задачей государства и общества в Узбекистане. Духовность это такой драгоценный плод, и это признание нашей молодежи о независимости великой семьи человеческого сердца, и любовь к свободе.
