CC BY
21
AUNiVERSUM:
№ 4 (97)_- » • •¿-■-i-i-ir.:.- ■:>: - I _апрель. 2022 г.
TRANSPORT, MINING AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
DOI - 10.32 743/UniTech.2022.97.4.13388
METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF SERVING PIGGYBACK TRANSPORTATION
Botir Ergashev
PhD student, Tashkent State Transport University, Uzbekistan, Tashkent E-mail: Botiravto@mail.ru
Gaffor Samatov
Professor
Tashkent State Transport University, Uzbekistan, Tashkent
Zokir Musabekov
PhD, associated professor Tashkent State Technical University is named after Islam Karimov,
Uzbekistan, Tashkent
Uralova Hilola
Assistant
Tashkent State Technical University is named after Islam Karimov,
Uzbekistan, Tashkent
МЕТОДИКА ОЦЕНКИ КАЧЕСТВА ОБСЛУЖИВАНИЯ КОНТРЕЙЛЕРНЫХ ПЕРЕВОЗОК
Эргашев Ботир
аспирант,
Ташкентский государственный транспортное университет, Республика Узбекистан, г. Ташкент
Саматов Гаффор
Профессор
Ташкентский государственный транспортное университет, Республика Узбекистан, г. Ташкент
Мусабеков Зокир
канд. техн. наук, доцент, Ташкентский государственный технический университет
имени Ислама Каримова, Республика Узбекистан, г. Ташкент
Уралова Хилола
ассистент,
Ташкентский государственный технический университет
имени Ислама Каримова, Республика Узбекистан, г. Ташкент
ABSTRACT
Within the framework of this article, the choice of the form of transport service with the help of ranked systems of criteria will be considered. When planning as the initial stage of quality management of logistics services, relationships with the client are fundamentally important. It is necessary not only to determine the composition of external and internal customers and their needs for logistics services but also to offer them service options, taking into account cost restrictions on the principle of "price-quality".
Библиографическое описание: METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF SERVING PIGGYBACK TRANSPORTATION // Universum: технические науки : электрон. научн. журн. Ergashev B. [и др.]. 2022. 4(97). URL: https://7universum.com/ru/tech/archive/item/13388
A UNÎVERSUM:
№ 4 (97)_♦ ♦ « .:>: ! :_апрель. 2022 г.
АННОТАЦИЯ
В данной статье рассмотрен выбор формы транспортного обслуживания с помощью ранжированных систем критериев, который заключается в прямом сравнении суммарного рейтинга перевозчиков полученного по алгоритму, рассматривающего вопросы управления качеством продукции и процессов. При планировании, как на начальном этапе управления качеством логистического обслуживания, принципиально важны взаимоотношения с клиентом. Необходимо не только определить состав внешних и внутренних клиентов и их потребности в логистическом обслуживании, но и предложить им варианты обслуживания с учетом затратных ограничений по принципу «цена - качество».
Keywords: transport, piggybacker, piggyback transportation, transport service, process quality, hierarchical property decomposition, hierarchy analysis method.
Ключевые слова: транспорт, контрейлер, контрейлерная транспортирование, услуга транспортная, качество процесса, иерархическая декомпозиция свойства, способ анализа иерархий.
Introduction
In foreign practice, piggyback transportation has been used since the second half of the 20th century. The leading countries in this segment of transportation are the USA, Canada, Australia, and the EU countries [1-4]. As a result of their use, a solution is made to the currently important task of forming clean ecological systems -"green technologies" that reduce the bad impact of vehicles on the environment around. It is taken into account that, in fact, the leading part of the path, auto transport methods move along the steel carriageway, by placing them on the railway rolling stock [1, 4]. Transport methods have every chance of being represented by single onboard cars, road trains, semi-trailers, and trailers, collectively called piggybacks. [5].
Currently, the CIS is actively working on the introduction of this transport technology, which provides modern interaction between road and rail transport. The implementation of the technology can improve the quality of transport services and increase the load on the country's transport corridors. The main stakeholder is the railway associations, as this will increase the volume of goods transported by rail. For any large company, it is always a priority to ensure the high quality of the services provided. The launch of these transportations in the CIS is limited by poor elaboration of a set of issues: technical, technological, organizational, economic, and regulatory [1-3].
The group of regulatory and legal issues to be resolved also includes the need to develop regulatory documents containing a range of quality indicators for piggyback transportation carried out by rail in international, long-distance, and local communications. The procedure for choosing the nomenclature of quality indicators, includes, among other things, the definition of:
• name (content) of the transport service;
• initial nomenclature of groups of quality indicators;
• the purposes of the application of the nomenclature of quality indicators.
Since the container, like the cargo in it, is an object of transport service for the railway, it is necessary to clarify the content of this concept defined by the standard [6]. In this case, the quality of a transport service should be understood as a set of characteristics that determine their suitability to meet the needs of cargo owners in the transportation of piggybackers and work related to their movement. A quantitative characteristic of one or more consumer properties of a service that makes up its quality is called an indicator of the quality of a transport service [6]. The set of characteristics forms a system of indicators of the quality of the transport service.
Material and methods
It is proposed to use the following quality characteristics to evaluate and standardize the quality of piggyback transportation: timeliness, safety, economy [6, 7]. The safety of transportation is a characteristic of the transport service, which determines the transportation of piggybackers without loss, damage, loss, and pollution. Timeliness of delivery - determines the arrival of the piggybackers at the final destination following the period established by the contract. The economy of delivery - causes the transportation of piggybackers with a minimum of transport costs.
At present, along with quantitative factors of the economic development of enterprises, qualitative factors are increasingly being put forward for decision-making. The main criteria for assessing the quality of transport:
UNIVERSUM:
ТЕХНИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ
Quality of service for piggyback transportation
Quality of piggyback service organization forms
Quality of piggyback transportation
Rolling stock operating costs
- Delivery time
- delivery speed
- rhythm of delivery -service - cargo safety flexibility of routes, etc.
Objective function Сmain. + Сsim => min
Figure 1. Criteria for assessing the quality of serving piggyback transportation
The quality of transport operation is a set of system properties that determine its ability to meet the organization's needs for transport services at a minimal cost. If we reflect the quality of the applied forms of organization of transport services in the form of an objective function, then it will look like this:
C C main.+Csim > min
where Cmain. is the operating costs associated with the acquisition and operation of the rolling stock.
Osim. - costs associated with downtime of the main production due to lack of transport,
The purposes of applying the nomenclature of quality indicators are determined following the objectives of quality management. Possible purposes of applying the nomenclature of quality indicators can be the establishment of nomenclature of quality indicators for the transportation of piggybackers for:
• inclusion in national standards and standards of organizations, as well as in the rules for the transportation of piggybackers by road and rail modes of transport;
• carrying out work on the development and implementation of quality management systems for transport services;
• carrying out research and development work aimed at improving the quality of transport services and the efficiency of the transportation process;
• inclusion in the terms of contractual obligations.
Results and discussions
Another reason for such a conclusion may be an analysis of the cost of shipping, in terms of reliability, delivery time, the safety of cargo during transportation. [8-15]. In this paper, the scheme for choosing the form of transport service using ranked systems of criteria (Table 1) is a direct comparison of the total rating of carriers obtained according to the algorithm shown in Figure 2 [15-17].
A UNÎVERSUM:
№ 4 (97)_- * « •¿-■-i-i-ir.:.- ■■>: i _anpejib. 2022 r.
END
Figure 2. Algorithm for the choice of transport serving piggybacks transportation
Table 1.
The main criteria for choosing the form of transport service
Content of criteria Rank
Delivery time reliability 1
Costs (tariffs) for transportation 2
Total delivery time 3
Readiness (flexibility) of the carrier to change the fare 4
Financial stability of the carrier 5
Technical readiness of rolling stock 6
Availability of additional cargo handling equipment 7
Availability of additional services for packaging and delivery 8
Safety of cargo (loss, theft) 9
Forwarding 10
Personnel qualification 11
Monitoring 12
The readiness (flexibility) of the carrier to change the service 13
Route flexibility 14
Order procedure 15
The quality of the organization of services for the sale of transport services 16
Special equipment 17
The following indicators are accepted as the main criteria for choosing the form of transport service (the ranks corresponding to them are given in brackets):
• delivery time reliability (1);
• freight rate (2);
• carrier's financial stability (5);
• technical readiness of rolling stock (6);
• cargo safety (9);
• the readiness (flexibility) of the carrier to change the service (13).
UNIVERSUM:
ТЕХНИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ
The degree of satisfaction of carriers with the chosen system of factors was assessed by independent experts according to a three-point assessment:
1 - good, 2 - fair, 3 - bad. The calculation of the carrier's rating for each factor was made taking into account the weight coefficients obtained from the calculation of the total number of factors divided by the corresponding rank. According to experts, the total rating was 12 and 13, taking into account the rank of factors with a weighting coefficient showed that the transport services of the motor depot are preferable.
After conducting an initial analysis of the efficiency of transport services in the car depot, transport costs were analyzed in detail. For their analysis, the method of calculating costs by processes was used. This toolkit is used more and more often in practice, as it allows for accurate calculations of the actual costs for each process.
Conclusions
Analyzing the above structure, the following should be noted: A key factor in ensuring the quality of logistics services is the availability of an accurate and objective assessment of its results. Evaluation of the effectiveness of logistics services is to compare the actual values of service quality indicators with the planned (normative) values. It can be both qualitative and quantitative. In a qualitative form, the assessment is the answer to the question - does the logistics service for the considered set of properties meet the requirements of the client, exceed them, or is inferior to them? In quantitative form, the assessment is expressed by the numerical value of the indicator of the quality of logistics services. When planning, as the initial stage of managing the quality of logistics services, relationships with the client are fundamentally important. It is necessary not only to determine the composition of external and internal customers and their needs for logistics services but also to offer them service options, taking into account cost restrictions on the principle of "price-quality".
References:
1. Холопов К.В. Зарубежный опыт и направления развития международных контрейлерных перевозок в России // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. 2011. №9. С. 101-109.
2. Багинова В.В., Кузьмин Д.В. Особенности развития контрейлерных перевозок в России // Современные проблемы транспортного комплекса России. 2013. №4. С. 49-52.
3. Федорина А.В., Цыганов А.В. Комплексный подход к внедрению контрейлерных перевоз в России // Современные проблемы транспортного комплекса России. 2015. №1(6). С. 21-28.
4. Скорченко М.Ю. Зарубежный опыт организации регулярного контрейлерного сообщения // Транспортные системы и технологии. 2018. Т.4. №1. С. 19-42.
5. Федорина А.В., Осинцев Н.А., Цыганов А.В. Обоснование выбора подвижного состава при организации контрейлерных перевозок // Актуальные проблемы современной науки, техники и образования: материалы 74-й международной научнотехнической конференции. Магнитогорск: Изд-во Магнитогорск. гос. техн. ун-та им. Г.И. Носова, 2016. Т.1. С. 29-31.
6. ГОСТ 30596-97. Услуги транспортные. Термины и определения. - М.: ИПК Издательство стандартов, 1997.
7. ГОСТ 30595-97. Услуги транспортные. Грузовые перевозки. Номенклатура показателей качества. - М.: ИПК Издательство стандартов, 1997.
8. Цыганов А.В. Факторы качества процесса перевозки контрейлеров // Инженерный вестник Дона. 2018. №4(51). Режим доступа: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n4y2018/535 7.
9. Цыганов А.В. Повышение эффективности использования карьерного транспорта за счет управления компетенцией персонала / А.В. Цыганов, Н.А. Осинцев, М.В. Здунов, И.В. Каблуков // Материалы 62 НТК по итогам НИР за 2002-2003 гг. - Магнитогорск: МГТУ, 2003. С. 176-178.
10. Цыганов А.В. Формирование технологических схем безопасной работы карьеров: монография / А.В. Цыганов, Н.А. Осинцев, С.Е. Гавришев, А.Н. Рахмангулов. Магнитогорск: Изд-во Магнитогорск. гос. техн. ун-та им. Г.И. Носова, 2014. - 166 с.
11. Каширцева Т.И. Грузоведение: учебник для специалистов / Н.Е. Лысенко, Т.В. Демянкова, Т.И. Каширцева -М.:УМЦ ЖДТ, 2013. - 344 с.
12. Цыганов А.В. Грузоведение: транспортная характеристика грузов: практикум / А.В. Цыганов - М.: НИЦ ИНФРА-М, 2018. - 87 с.
13. Корнилов С.Н. Организация перевозок и управление на транспорте. Техника. Т.2. Ч.1: учебное пособие / С.Н. Корнилов, Н.А. Осинцев, А.В. Цыганов, А.Н. Рахмангулов. Магнитогорск: Изд-во Магнитогорск. гос. техн. ун-та им. Г.И. Носова, 2014. - 252 с.
14. Цыганов А.В. Оценка эксплуатации автомобильного транспорта при контрейлерных п ревозках грузов // Актуальные проблемы современной науки, техники и образования: тезисы докладов 76-й международной научно-технической конференции. Магнитогорск: Изд-во Магнитогорск. гос. техн. ун-та им. Г.И. Носова, 2018. Т.2. С. 66.
A UNÎVERSUM:
№ 4 (97)_- » « -¿---i-i-ir.:.- ■■>: i _апрель. 2022 г.
15. Михайловский И.А., Гун Е.И. Учёт технологических рисков при анализе качества продукции путём иерархической декомпозиции качества // Качество в обработке материалов. 2014. №2. С. 33- 38. 16. Саати Т. Принятие решений. Метод анализа иерархий. - М.: Радио и связь, 1993. - 278 с.
16. Ergashev, B., Samatov, G., Burxanov, J., & Kodirov, J. (2021). MULTIMODAL USULIDA TASHISHLARNING MAMLAKAT VA MINTAQALAR RIVOJLANISHIDAGI O 'RNI. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 1(11), 726-733.
17. Ergashev, Botir Zokir O'G'Li, & Samatov, Gaffor Allaqulovich (2021). KONTRAILERLI TASHUVLARNI TASHKIL ETISHNING AFZALLIKLARI. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 1 (7), 235-238.
