MAXWELL-GOMPERTZ DISTRIBUTION: PROPERTIES
AND APPLICATIONS
Alfred Adewole Abiodun1*, Aliyu Ismail Ishaq2, Olakiitan Ibukun Adeniyi3, Ifeanyi Vivian Omekam4, Jumoke Popoola5, Olubimpe Mercy Oladuti6 and Eunice
Ohunene Job7
1 345Department of Statistics, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria 2Department of Statistics, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria ^Department of Statistics, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria 7Department of Statistics, Federal University Lokoja, Nigeria [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],[email protected], [email protected],
Abstract
This paper proposed a three parameter Maxwell-Gompertz distribution as an extension of Gompertz distribution. Some statistical properties of the distribution such as moments, survival and hazard functions, quantile function, Renyi entropy and order statistics were derived. Maximum likelihood method was used to estimate the model parameters. A simulation study was carried out in order to gain an insight into the performance on small, moderate and large samples. The flexibility of the new distribution was empirically demonstrated in comparison to four other extensions of Gompertz distributions using two real life datasets.
Keywords: Maxwell-Gompertz, generator, skewness, Renyi entropy, maximum likelihood
I. Introduction
Gompertz distribution is a popular distribution commonly used in many applied problems, particularly in modelling lifetime data [1]. The distribution is often characterized by an increasing hazard function and it is commonly used to describe the distribution of adult life spans by actuaries and demographers [2]. It is also considered for modelling survival data in some sciences such as gerontology [3], computer science [4], biology [5], and marketing science [6]. For more details about the Gompertz distribution and its applications, see [7], [8]. The cumulative distribution function (cdf) and probability density function (pdf) of the Gompertz random variable X are respectively given as
- C (ebx -1)
T(x,5) = 1 - e b , (1)
and
-ff ebx -1)
t(x,5) = cebxe b , 5>0;x >0 (2)
where 5 = (b, c) with b denting the shape parameter and c the scale parameter.
A. Abiodun, A. Ishaq, O. Adeniyi, I. Omekam, J. Popoola, O. Oladuti and E. Job RT&A, No 2 (78) MAXWELL-GOMPERTZ DISTRIBUTION: PROPERTIES AND APPLICATIONS_V°lume I9, June, 2024
The development of new families of distributions has become an important trend in the theory and application of distributions. Such new families of distributions are often compounded by adding one or more parameters to the well-known standard baseline distributions. This has become necessary because the resulting extended new distributions provide greater flexibility in modelling observed data. A few of such families of distributions which have been explored in the recent times include, among others the Beta-G of [9], a new generalized odd log-logistic family of distributions by [10], The generalized odd half-Cauchy family of distributions by [11], a New Kumaraswamy generalized family of distributions by [12].
Several other families of distributions can be mentioned such as Odd F family of distributions by [13], Odd Beta Prime family of distributions by [14], Generalized odd Maxwell family of distributions by [15], Generalized beta-generated distributions of [16], Garhy-generated family of distributions by [17], Gamma-G Type-3 of [18], The Logistic-X family of [19], a new Weibull-X family of [20], a-Zubair-G family of [21], and a new Alpha power transformed family distribution by [22].
Gompertz distribution has been extended by some authors in the literature through the addition of one or more other parameters. Some of such studies in the recent time include the modified beta Gompertz distribution by [23], the generalized Gompertz distribution by [24] which was based on an idea of [25], the cubic transmuted Gompertz distribution by [26], the odd generalized exponential-Gompertz distribution by [27], the transmuted Gompertz distribution by [28] and the odd lindley-Gompertz distribution by [29]. This article seeks to develop a distribution that has the characterization of the Gompertz and Maxwell distributions in a unified framework. The Maxwell distribution was introduced by [30], and it has the cdf given as
-;M!£} (3)
with r(u, b) -j^sb-1e^sds denoting the lower incomplete gamma function. The associated pdf of(3)is
_uUL
¡2 U2e 2°2
g(u,a) -.--^—- u,a > 0 (4)
V^ a3
where a is the scale parameter.
Studies involving Maxwell generalized family of distributions have not been widely covered in the literature. However, [31] proposed Maxwell-Weibull distribution by applying the odd ratio link approach of [32]. Also, [33] developed Maxwell-Dagum distribution while [34] developed Maxwell-Lomax distribution.
II. Methods 2.1.The Maxwell-Gompertz (Mgom) Distribution
Consider a random variable X which follows the Gompertz distribution with the cumulative and probability density functions as defined in (1) and (2) respectively. Following [31] who proposed Maxwell family of distributions for continuous generator, we can present the cumulative density function of Maxwell-G family as
2 u2e 2a2 2 ' ' ~ ^
F(x;a,3)-j1-T(x3\2- 4= r
J0 V T --3
u
T (x ,3)
a
3 i T(x,3) 2'2a2 [ 1 -T(x,3
a > 0;x > 0 (5)
and the corresponding pdf is given as
f (;a,9) =
2t( x ,5)
T(x,9)
exp
( T(x,9) 2a2 11 - T(x,9
2 A
(6)
a' V2t(1 - T(x,9))2 ^ 1 - T(x,9, where 9 = (b, c) denotes the vector of parameters of the baseline Gompertz distribution.
Substituting (1) in (5) gives the proposed cdf of the Maxwell-Gompertz (MGom) distributions
as
f
F( x;a, b,c) =—j=Y
(
3 1 2,2a2
1 - e
tLebx-1р2 J
- C(ebx-1)
, a,b,c > ; x > 0
and on substituting (1) and (2) in (6), the pdf can be obtained as 2cebx I 1-e"b(rbX "X
f( x ;a, b,c ) = -
(
r
- ebx -1)^
-exp
f ebx -1)^
2a
1 - e b
-c( ebx-1)
(7)
(8)
2.2 Linear Representation of MGom Density
Consider the power series expansion of the exponential function
-* vH»' '
e = > -—— x
S ' !
Putting (9) in (8) and dropping (a,b,c) inf (a,b,c) for simplicity, we have
—(ebx-1
f(x) = t (-1) 11 - "
'■Дж i=0 i |(2a2 )'
Y
(9)
(10)
Considering the generalized binomial expansion in power of positive real number j ,
expressed as
(1 - x y-yHÖ^k v 7 £ kir(u+1 - k)
By applying (11) to (10) we obtain f(*)= Î 2C(-1) k r(4 + 2 + j)r(3 + 2i + j)
jk=o i I jlk l(2a2 )' a^V2^r(4 + 2i )r(3 + 2i + j - k )
^bx^)(ebx-1)
(11)
(12)
Thus, the pdf of the MGom distribution expressed as a linear representation is obtained by applying (9) to (12) which gives
V 71 ' (13)
(14)
f (x) = ",.,^t^jrlС(1 + k)J (ebx -1 )'
да
Еф eMm-l-1)
l ,m '
l ,m=0
(-1)l+m Г(l +1) ( c
where ф =
llmir(l +1 - m){ b
(! + k) I Qij,k
and ,k = t
2c (-1)'+k Г(4 + 2i + j )Г(3 + 2i + j ) i, jk=o i I jlk l(2a2)' a3^2ïïr(4 + 2i )Г(3 + 2i + j - k )
The plots of the pdf and cdf of MGom distribution using different parameter values are displayed in Figures 1 and 2 respectively. From Figure 1, it is observed that the pdf of the MGom distribution is skewed to the right and therefore will be a good model for different kinds of positively skewed data sets.
Figure 1: Plots of pdf and cdf of EGILx distribution
2.3 Statistical Properties
Some structural properties of the Maxwell-Gompertz distribution are discussed in this section.
2.3.1 Moments
Suppose that X denote a continuous random variable, the rth non-central moment of X is given by
M
E(Xr ) =J xrf (x)dx . (15)
—M
Taking f(x) as the pdf of the MGom distribution given in (14), the rth moments of X is given as
M M
E(Xr) =£®,„Jxrebx(m—l—1)dx . (16)
l ,m=0 0
Let,
y = bx(m -1 -1),^ x =
У
b(m -1 -1)
, so that dx =
dy
b(m -1 -1)
By inserting (17) into (16), we obtain
да I
E( ^ ) =£Ф l,m {
У
l,m=0 0 V
dy
b(m -1 -1) J b(m -1 -1 )
ЕФ/m
-Г(г +1).
(b(m — I — 1))' which is the moments of MGom distribution.
(17)
(18)
r
2.3.2. Quantile function
Quantile function of MGom can be derived by inverting the cdf given in (7). If we let
(
F(x ) = -=у •42n
3 1 2,2aI
f Mx 1 - e * Mebx -1)
= u,
(20)
then by solving (20) for x we obtain
f f
xa = Q(u) = b_1 log
1 - b log c
(
1 --
2a у I -,иГ 1 2 V 2
,0.5 M
(if ЛЛ^0.5
V ' 12 V2yyy yy
1 +
(21)
where u is a uniform random variable defined on interval (0,1).
We can obtain the three quartiles Q1, Q2 and Q3 from (21) by using u = 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 respectively.
2.3.3 Survival function
The survival function for the MGom random variable X~MGom(a, b,c) from the cdf in (7) is obtained as
(
S(x ,a, b,c ) = 1 - F( x ) = 1 —4= у
42n
3 1 2,7л1
f -cfebx 1 - e"^
( ebx-1)
(22)
The plot of the survival function of MGom for different parameter values is displayed in Figure 3.
Figure 2: Plots of the survival function of MGom distribution
As observed from the plots in Figure 2, the value of the survival function equals one at initial value of zero, it decreases as x increases and degenerates to zero as x becomes larger, which is a major characteristic of survival function.
2.3.4 Hazard function
The hazard function can be obtained using the pdf in (8) and survival function in (22) as
2cebx I 1-e-b(ebx -1)
h( x ) =
f ( x ) S( x )
exp
2a
- ebx -1)^ 1 - e b
- € ebx-1)
2 >
Г ebx-1)^
(
1-
3 1 2,2a2
1 - e b
(ebx -1)A
2
-b(ebx-1)
(23)
The plots for the hazard function of MGom distribution for different parameter values are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 3: Plot of the hazard function of MGom distribution
From the plots in Figure 3, it is observed that the value of the hazard function increases as X increases, meaning that the conditional probability of failure within a given interval of time for a random variable following MGom distribution increases as life ages.
2.3.5 Renyi entropy
If X is a random variable with density function f (x) as defined in (8), then the Renyi entropy of the MGom distribution is defined as
1 -i
J f !(x)dx
t > 0, t ф 1
(24)
The term f1 (x) in (24) can be simplified as
f 4 x ) =
-ЩЬ -1 (2c) eb e ь(e 1
—t
--(ebx -1)
1 - e b )
(a3V2^J '=o i l(2a2)' By applying (9) to (25), we have
2
f ^ ) =
(2c J
eibx e-b (
(-/ 4i + 2i + j)
(a3V2^ - i!(2a2) U j¡r(4i + 2i)
—(ebx-1
1 - e b'
s 2i+2i+j
Using binomial expansion defined in (11), equation (26) becomes
c (i+k )/
r(;.) (2c)' J (-)" r( 4/ + 2/ + 7 )r(2; + 2/ + j +1) ^ —
(cfjzx*) /7k=0/! j!kl(2o2)' r(4/ + 2/)r(2i + 2/ + 7 +1 -k) which on simplification becomes
f'(* )=E5, 7 k,^-1-'),
(26)
(27)
(28)
l ,m=0
where 5
Î20L £ (-)"•" r(4i + 2 + j)r(2i + 2 + j + 1)r(l+1) I c(i + k By taklng the
"lm (a3Vz^)''jk-0i! j\k\I\m\(2a2)' r(4; + 2i)r(2; + 2i + j +1 -k)r( I +1 -m)Vb integral of (28) and substituting (17) gives
w c CO
j /'(x )dx -£S tJ„ m J e-bx( m-!-1) dx
-C I ,m-0 0
C C
Y s Y s
/ ' i, j ,k ,I ,m c / ' i, j ,k ,I ,m
-"T0-T je ydy - -T0-x . (29)
b(m -1 - 1)j b (m -1 -1)
Substituting (29) in (24), the Renyi entropy of the MGom distribution can be given as
R =-
1 -i
E s
/ - i ,j,k ,l ,m l ,m=0
b(m -1 -1)
i* 1
(30)
2.3.6 Order statistics
Suppose that X1,X2,...,Xn is a random sample of size n from MGom distribution and X^,X[2),...,Xw
denote the corresponding order statistics of the sample, then the pdf of the ith order statistics is given as
f ( x ) = —
n!
f -r^—f( * * )]/_1[1 - *, (31)
(/ - 1)!(n -1)!
where F(x) and f(*) are defined in (7) and (8). Using the definition of binomial expansion for the term [1 - F(x )]n-1, (31) can be expressed as
„! n-/
f (x) =-n-E (-1)k I n ' f (x)F(xy
/L J (i - 1)!(n -1)!EL J I k /L J 1 J
(32)
Consequently, using (7) and (8), the pdf of ith order statistics for the MGom distribution can be obtained as
fMGom =_n_Y(-1)k I n i If (x)F (x)'+
(/ l)!(n iy.E \k MGom^ J MGom J
(33)
From (33), The pdf of the smallest and largest order statistics can be obtained by setting i = 1 and i = n respectively.
1
2.3.7 Parameter estimation
This section derives the maximum likelihood estimator of MGom distribution. Let Xt,X2,..., be a
random sample of size n drawn from X~ MGom( ©) with observed values x] ,x2 ...xn ,whci'c 0 = (a, b,c)T is a p x 1 vector of parameters to be estimated. The likelihood function is given as
L(©) = 1
2c
n
ebxe b
(ebx-1)
( cbx -1) I2 ( ( -cCebx "1
1 -e b
-C(ebx-1)
nexp
2
1
2a2
1 -e b
-c(ebx -1)
(34)
The log likelihood function (if) is obtained as
££ = n\og(2) + n\og(c)-^\og(2z)-3n\og(a) + bf^(xi) + ^\og(e^-l)
i-2£ log
1 -e b(
b-1)
-z
1 -e b(
b-1)
i=1 b ,=1 V
Taking the partial derivatives of (35) with respect to a, b and c to obtain
dCC -3 n -=-+ '
da a a
dCC ^
-= / xi +
db tr '
and
b i (^ (^))-C § (M)
-2S
f „ \
V Wie M
1 ^ ( w;m,
- 721
a ,=1 V e •
—=-+iw+2i AHi
de c trV trle^'J a ¡~i
i=1 i=1 „bx.
n ( wt ^
V e- M ,
v , y
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
where 3t =-, w =
b e '
and m= C f x ebx, |. b l ' b
e -1 1 - e— , c, bx,
due dec dec
Setting — = 0, -= 0 and -= 0, and solving the resulting nonlinear system of equations,
da db dc
we can obtain the maximum likelihood estimates at, b,C. However, these equations cannot be solved analytically, thus statistical software can be used to solve them numerically using iterative methods.
III. Results
3.1 Simulation study
A simulation study is carried out here to investigate the performance of the maximum likelihood
estimates of MGom distribution. The simulation is based on the quantile function defined in (21)
for four sets of parameter vector © = (a, b, c). We generate 1000 replications of random samples of
sizes 50, 100, 200 and 500. The four sets of the parameter's values are assigned as follows:
Set 1: a = 0.5, b = 0.5, c = 0.5
Set 2: a = 1.0, b = 1.0, c = 1. 0
Set 3: a = 2.0, b = 2.0, c = 2.0
Set 4: a = 0.5, b = 2.0, c = 1.0.
The maximum likelihood estimates © = (a, b,C) are determined based on each generated sample, by maximizing the log-likelihood function in (35). The average estimates, average bias, denoted Bias and Root mean square error (RMSE) are then determined where
n
1000
Bias(©) = £ (© . -©) and RMSE(0) =
1000 p1
1000
1/2
£ (©j-©)2
1000 j=1
The results of the simulation study are displayed in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1: The parameter estimates (Est), Bias and RMSE.
a = 0.5, b = 0. 5, c = 0.5 a = 1.0, b = =1. 0, c = 1.0
N Parameter Est Bias RMSE Est Bias RMSE
a 0.5374 0.0374 1.9486 1.2385 0.2385 2.1963
50 b 0.5187 0.0187 1.5791 1.2189 0.2189 1.7649
c 0.5265 0.0265 1.8411 1.3019 0.3019 1.9253
a 0.5210 0.0210 1.2814 1.2273 0.2273 1.8189
100 b 0.5146 0.0146 1.3166 1.1916 0.1916 1.4729
c 0.5158 0.0158 1.5778 1.2342 0.2342 1.6071
a 0.5113 0.0113 1.1519 1.1218 0.1218 1.4658
200 b 0.5138 0.0138 1.1608 1.1126 0.1126 1.2075
c 0.5114 0.0114 1.2764 1.1480 0.1480 1.4526
a 0.5037 0.0037 0.7342 1.0490 0.0490 0.8903
500 b 0.5069 0.0069 0.6969 1.0307 0.0307 0.5933
c 0.5023 0.0023 0.7564 1.0657 0.0657 0.7505
Table 2: The parameter estimates (Est), Bias and RMSE.
a = 2.0, b = 2. 0, c = 2.0 a = 0.5, b =1.0, c = 2.0
N Parameter Est Bias RMSE Est Bias RMSE
a 2.2882 0.2882 2.2462 0.5164 0.0164 1.8385
50 b 2.1828 0.1828 1.8214 1.2062 0.2062 2.0963
c 2.3944 0.3944 2.0236 2.1642 0.1642 2.1462
a 2.1901 0.1901 2.1038 0.5099 0.0099 1.1713
100 b 2.1643 0.1643 1.6454 1.1616 0.1616 1.7189
c 2.2729 0.2729 1.9016 2.1001 0.1001 2.0038
a 2.1421 0.1421 1.9643 0.5056 0.0056 1.0418
200 b 2.1226 0.1226 1.4325 1.0823 0.0823 1.3658
c 2.1933 0.1933 1.7031 2.0992 0.0992 1.8643
a 2.0442 0.0442 0.8606 0.5021 0.0021 0.6241
500 b 2.0320 0.0320 0.6542 1.0361 0.0361 0.7903
c 2.0580 0.0580 0.7730 2.0542 0.0542 0.7606
3.2 Data Application
Application of the MGom distribution to two real life data sets are provided to show how it can be applied in practice in comparison to other distributions in the family. The proposed distribution is compared with four other Gompertz distribution extensions, namely: power Gompertz (powGom), exponentiated Gompertz (expGom), Marshall-Olkin Gompertz (M-OGom) and odd-logistic Gompertz (Odd-loGom). The goodness-of- fit criteria and tests used in the choice of the most appropriate distribution include Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), Consistent Akaike's Information Criterion (CAIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Hannan-Quinn Information Criterion (HQIC), as well as Anderson-Darling (A ) and Cramér-von Mises ( W* ) tests. These can
be computed as follows
AIC = -2C + 2p,
CAIC = —2f-
2np
n-p-1
BIC = —21 + plog(n),
and
HQIC = -2 C + 2plog(log(n),
=(+4n+1 )jn+n g(2/- i)io6[z<(1 - zn-/+i,
W =[ + l ]| £ ( zj ~ "*")] | , where zj = F{xj] and xt 's are the ordered observations, C
/=1
2n ) 2n
is the maximized log likelihood of the parameter vector © = (a,b,c), n is the number of
observations, and p is the number of estimated parameters.
The model with the smallest value of these measures is preferred to other models.
Dataset 1: This dataset is taken from [35]. The data represent the time between failures of 30 repairable items.
1.43,0.11,0.71,0.77,2.63,1.49,3.46,2.46,0.59,0.74,1.23,0.94,4.36,0.40,1.74,4.73,2.23,0.45,0.70,1.06,1.46,0.30 ,1.82,2.37,0.63,1.23,1.24,1.97,1.86,1.17.
Dataset 2: The dataset consists of 100 observations of breaking stress of carbon fibers (in Gba) given by [36] as given below:
0.39, 0.81, 0.85, 0.98, 1.08, 1.12, 1.17, 1.18, 1.22, 1.25, 1.36, 1.41, 1.47, 1.57, 1.57, 1.59, 1.59, 1.61, 1.61,
1.69, 1.69, 1.71, 1.73, 1.80, 1.84, 1.84, 1.87, 1.89, 1.92, 2.00, 2.03, 2.03, 2.05, 2.12, 2.17, 2.17, 2.17, 2.35, 2.38, 2.41, 2.43, 2.48, 2.48, 2.50, 2.53, 2.55, 2.55, 2.56, 2.59, 2.67, 2.73, 2.74, 2.76, 2.77, 2.79, 2.81, 2.81, 2.82, 2.83, 2.85, 2.87, 2.88, 2.93, 2.95, 2.96, 2.97, 2.97, 3.09, 3.11, 3.11, 3.15, 3.15, 3.19, 3.19, 3.22, 3.22, 3.27, 3.28, 3.31, 3.31, 3.33, 3.39, 3.39, 3.51, 3.56, 3.60, 3.65, 3.68, 3.68, 3.68, 3.70, 3.75, 4.20, 4.38, 4.42,
4.70, 4.90, 4.91, 5.08, 5.56.
Dataset 1
Figure 4: Density and boxplots for dataset 1
Dataset 2
Figure 5: Density and boxplots for dataset 2
Figure 6: TTT Plots for datasets 1 and 2
Table 3: MLEs and goodness-of-fit-statistics for dataset 1.
Model a B C AIC CAIC BIC HQIC A* W*
MGom 0.5463 0.1282 1.2171 85.3735 85.6965 89.5771 86.7183 0.1290 0.0173
PowGom 0.4806 0.0131 1.3732 86.9282 86.9513 91.6231 89.3729 0.3642 0.0532
ExpGom 1.8355 0.2814 1.3073 86.2447 86.8677 91.1483 88.0894 0.3466 0.0471
M-OGom 0.3422 0.3516 0.2785 88.6075 89.1306 92.3111 89.9522 0.4120 0.0868
Odd-lGom 0.5555 0.0223 1.5030 86.0282 86.2965 90.2318 87.2183 0.2114 0.0279
Table 4: MLEs and goodness-of-fit-statistics for dataset 2
Model a B C AIC CAIC BIC HQIC A* W*
MGom 0.2628 0.1015 1.8936 278.528 278.779 286.344 281.691 0.3542 0.0563
PowGom 0.1010 0.0561 1.8671 298.771 299.022 306.587 301.934 0.5600 0.0791
ExpGom 0.3620 0.5327 0.7557 293.555 293.805 301.371 296.718 0.5109 0.0711
M-OGom 0.0835 0.7208 0.2346 307.515 307.765 315.331 310.678 0.8052 0.1309
Odd-lGom 0.1329 0.5124 1.6392 291.109 291.359 298.924 294.272 0.4564 0.0674
IV. Discussion
As observed from Tables 1 and 2, for all the different parameter settings, the average of the estimates for a, b, and c get closer to the true parameter values as the sample size increases. Also, the average Bias and the RMSE decrease as the sample size increases. These results validate the asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators.
As observed from the density plot as well as box plot depicted in Figures 4 and 5, it is clear that dataset 1 is heavily skewed to the right and, dataset 2 is moderately skewed to the right, hence the two datasets are could be good for a flexible model like MGom distribution. The total time on test (TTT) curve of the datasets are also plotted in Figure 6 to obtain the empirical behaviour of the hazard function. As observed, the shapes of the hazard function of both datasets are concave showing increasing hazards, and this could also be a good candidate for Gompertz distribution and any of its compound distributions.
Tables 3 and 4 present the maximum likelihood estimates and the values of goodness-of-fit statistics for datasets 1 and 2 respectively. It was found that MGom distribution had the smallest values of all these measures (AIC, CAIC, BIC, HQIC, A and W*) and therefore can be best used in comparison to other Gompertz extensions for modelling real life situations of positively skewed data with increasing hazard rates.
References
[1] Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. and Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous Univariate Distributions. 2nd ednion John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[2] Willemse, W. and Koppelaar H. (2000). Knowledge elicitation of Gompertz' law of mortality. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2:168-179.
[3] Brown, K. and Forbes, W. (1974). A mathematical model of aging processes. Journal Gerontology, 29(1): 46-51.
[4] Ohishi, K., Okamura, H. and Dohi, T. (2009). Gompertz software reliability model: Estimation Algorithm and empirical validation. Journal of Systems and Software, 82(3): 535-543.
[5] Economos, A. C. (1982). Rate of aging, rate of dying and the mechanism of mortality. Archieves of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 1(1): 46-51.
[6] Bemmaor, A. C. and Glady, N. (2012). Modeling purchasing behavior with sudden "death": A flexible customer lifetime model. Management Science, 58(5): 1012-1021.
[7] Pollard, J. H. and Valkovics, E. J. (1992). The Gompertz distribution and its applications. Genus, 48(3): 15-28.
[8] Missov, T. I. and Lenart, A. (2011). Linking period and cohort life-expectancy linear increases in Gompertz proportional hazards models. Demographic Research, 24: 455-468.
[9] Eugene, N., Lee, C. and Famoye, F. (2002). Beta-normal distribution and it applications. Communication in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 31(4): 497-512.
[10] Haghbin, H., Ozel, G., Alizadeh, M. and Hamedani, G. G. (2017). A new generalized odd log-logistic family of distributions. Communication in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 46(20): 98979920.
[11] Cordeiro, G. M., Alizadeh, M., Ramires, T. G. and Ortega, E. M. M. (2018). The generalized odd half-Cauchy family of distributions: Properties and applications. Communication in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 46: 5685-5705.
[12] Tahir, M. H., Hussain, M. A., Gauss, M, C., El-Morshedy, M. and Eliwa, M. S. (2020). A New Kumaraswamy Generalized Family of Distributions with Properties, Applications, and Bivariate Extension. Mathematics, 8(11). D0I:10.3390/math8111989.
[13] Ishaq, A. I., Usman, A., Tasi'u, M., Suleiman, A. A. and Ahmad, A. G. (2022). A New Odd F-Weibull Distribution: Properties and Application of the Monthly Nigerian Naira to British Pound Exchange Rate Data. 2022 International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI), 326-332.
[14] Suleiman, A. A., Daud, H., Singh, N. S. S., Othman, M., Ishaq, A. I. and Sokkalingam, R. (2023). A Novel Odd Beta Prime-Logistic Distribution: Desirable Mathematical Properties and Applications to Engineering and Environmental Data. Sustainability, 15 (1). DOI:10.3390/su151310239.
[15] Ishaq, A. I., Panitanarak, U., Abiodun, A. A., Suleiman, A, A. and Daud, H. (2024). The Generalized Odd Maxwell-Kumaraswamy Distribution: Its Properties and Applications. Contemporary Mathematics, 5: 711-742.
[16] Alexander, C., Cordeiro, G. M., Ortega, E. M. M. and Sarabia, J. M. (2012). Generalized beta-generated distributions. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 56(6): 1880-1897.
[17] Elgarhy, M., Hassan, A. S. and Rashed, M. (2016). Garhy-Generated Family of Distributions with Application. Mathematical Theory and Modeling, 6: 1-15.
[18] Torabi, H., Montezari, N. H. (2012). The gamma-uniform distribution and its application. Kybernetika, 48:16-30.
[19] Tahir, M. H., Cordeiro, G. M., Alizadeh, M., Mansoor, M. and Zubair, M. (2016). The Logistic-X family of distributions and its applications. Communication in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 45: 7326-7349.
[20] Ahmad, Z., Elgarhy, M. and Hamedani, G. G. (2018). A new Weibull-X family of distributions: properties, characterizations and applications. Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, 5: 1-18.
[21] Kyurkchiev, N., Iliev, A. and Rahnev, A. (2019). Comments on a Zubair-G Family of Cumulative Lifetime Distributions. Some Extensions. Communications in Applied Analysis, 23(1): 120.
[22] Elbatal, Z., Ahmad, M., Elgarhy, A. M. and Almarashi, J. (2019). A new alpha power transformed family of distributions: properties and applications to the Weibull model. The journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Applications, 12: 1-20.
[23] Elbatal, I., Jamal, F., Chesneau, C., Elgarhy, M. and Alrajhi, S. (2018). The Modified Beta Gompertz Distribution: Theory and Applications. Mathematics, 7 (3). D01:10.3390/math7010003.
[24] El-Gohary, A. and Al-Otaibi, A. N. (2013). The generalized Gompertz distribution. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(1-2):13-24.
[25] Gupta, R. D. and Kundu, D. (1999). Generalized exponential distribution. Austrian and New- Zealand Journal of Statistics, 41: 173-188.
[26] Ogunde, A. A., Olayode, F. and Audu, A. A. (2020). Cubic Transmuted Gompertz Distribution: As a Life Time Distribution. Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science, 35(1): 105-116.
[27] El-Damcese, M. A., Mustafa, A., El-Desouky, B. S. and Mustafa, M. E. (2015). The Odd generalized exponential Gompertz distribution. Applied Mathematics, 6: 2340-2353.
[28] Abdul-Moniem, I. B. and Seham, M. (2015). Transmuted Gompertz distribution. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 1(3): 88-96.
[29] Kuje, S., Lasisi, K. E., Nwaosu, S. C. and Alkafawi, A. M. A. (2019). On the properties and applications of the odd Lindley- Gompertz distribution. Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 10(10): 10364-10370.
[30] Maxwell, J. C. (1860). Illustrations of the dynamical theory of gases. Part I. On the motions and collisions of perfectly elastic spheres. The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 19:19-32.
[31] Ishaq, A. I. and Abiodun, A. A. (2020). The Maxwell-Weibull Distribution in Modeling
Lifetime Datasets. Annals of Data Science., 7: 639-662.
[32] Alzaatreh, A., Lee, C. and Famoye, F. (2013). A new method for generating families of continuous distributions," Metron, 71(1): 63-79.
[33] Ishaq, A. I. and Abiodun, A. A. (2021). On the developments of Maxwell-Dagum distribution. Journal of Statistical Modelling: Theory and Applications, 2(2): 1-23.
[34] Abiodun, A. A. and Ishaq, A. I. (2022). On Maxwell-Lomax distribution: properties and Applications. Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 29(1): 221-232.
[35] Murthy, D. N. P., Xie, M. and Jiang, R. (2004). Weibull models. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.
[36] Hassan, A. S., Sabry, M. A. H and Elsehetry, A. M. (2020). A New Family of Upper-Truncated Distributions: Properties and Estimation. Thailand Statisticians, 18(2): 196-214.