CC BY
54
УДК 624.04:531.391.3 DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2019.7.844-851
Lower estimate of the fundamental frequency of natural oscillations of a truss with an arbitrary number of panels
Mikhail N. Kirsanov
National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI); 14 Krasnokazarmennaya st., Moscow, 111250, Russian Federation
ABSTRACT
Introduction: the paper deals with oscillations of a statically definable plane, truss with a double lattice of racks and descending braces with massive loads in the nodes of the lower chord. The weight of the truss rods is not taken into account. It is assumed that the freights are moved only vertically. The fundamental frequency of natural oscillations is estimated from the Dunkerley formula by the values of partial frequencies.
Materials and methods: an analytical estimate is obtained by generalizing formulas obtained from a series of estimates for trusses with a consistently increasing number of panels. The stiffness of the truss was determined using the Mohr's integral. The double lattice of the truss does not allow using the cross-section method; therefore, the forces in the rods were calculated (or estimated) in an analytical form using the method of cutting nodes with the compilation of a system of equilibrium equations simultaneously for all rods and three support reactions. The matrix of equilibrium equations was compiled in a software program written in the language of the Maple computer mathematics system based on the coordinates Ф № of the nodes and the values of the direction cosines of the forces. For a sequence of coefficients of the desired formula, linear
g homogeneous recurrent equations were found and solved by means of special operators of the Maple system.
Results: the resulting formula estimating the relationship between the fundamental frequency and the panels number has N N the form of a sixth degree polynomial with coefficients depending on the parity of the number of panels. The analytical result
is compared with the smallest frequency obtained numerically from the solution of the problem of oscillation of the cargo > jfl system. It is shown that the main frequency, depending on the truss height, has an extremum.
;2 — Conclusions: the method of generalizing particular solutions using the Maple system operators allowed authors to obtain
and analyze a formula for a lower estimate of the fundamental frequency of oscillation of a truss model with an arbitrary ^ Ф number of panels. The resulting estimate can be used as a test for numerically obtained solutions. The formula is especially
efficient for systems with a large number of panels; as numerical methods for their calculation are time-consuming require О — considerable time and have a tendency for accumulating rounding errors.
н .2
>
ОТ
~ ro
KEYWORDS: truss, natural oscillations, fundamental frequency, induction, lower frequency estimate, Maple
^ FOR CITATION: Kirsanov M.N. Lower estimate of the fundamental frequency of natural oscillations of a truss with an
arbitrary number of panels. Vestnik MGSU [Proceedings of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering]. 2019; 14:7:844-
O^ 851. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2019.7.844-851 (rus.).
о со
2 cd с произвольным числом панелей
от
Нижняя оценка основной частоты собственных колебаний фермы
М.Н. Кирсанов
cl 5э Национальный исследовательский университет «Московский энергетический институт»
(НИУ «МЭИ»); 111250, г. Москва, ул. Красноказарменная, д. 14
Ё5 2 АННОТАЦИЯ
? о Введение: рассмотрены колебания статически определимой плоской фермы с двойной решеткой из стоек и нисхо-
Z от дящих раскосов с массивными грузами в узлах нижнего пояса. Масса стержней фермы не учитывается. Предпола-
ОТ "б гается, что грузы перемещаются только вертикально. Основная частота собственных колебаний оценивается снизу
ф по формуле Донкерлея по значениям парциальных частот.
о Материалы и методы: аналитическая оценка получена обобщением формул, выведенных по ряду оценок для
^ ферм с последовательно увеличивающимся числом панелей. Жесткость фермы определена с помощью интеграла
Sj Э Мора. Двойная решетка фермы не позволяет применять метод сечений, поэтому усилия в стержнях находятся в
l_ W аналитической форме методом вырезания узлов с составлением системы уравнений равновесия одновременно
S 5 для стержней и трех реакций опор. Матрица уравнений равновесия составлена в программе, написанной на языке
5 ^ системы компьютерной математики Maple по данным о координатах узлов и значениям направляющих косинусов
I с усилий. Для последовательности коэффициентов искомой формулы с помощью специальных операторов системы
о «
О (П Maple найдены и решены линейные однородные рекуррентные уравнения.
© Mikhail N. Kirsanov, 2019
Распространяется на основании Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC)
Результаты: полученная формула зависимости основной частоты от числа панелей имеет вид полинома шестой степени с коэффициентами, зависящими от четности числа панелей. Аналитический результат сравнивается с наименьшей частотой, полученной численно из решения задачи о колебании системы грузов. Показано, что основная частота в зависимости от высоты фермы имеет экстремум.
Выводы: метод обобщения частных решений с применением операторов системы Maple позволил получить и проанализировать формулу для нижней оценки основной частоты колебания модели фермы с произвольным числом панелей. Данная оценка может быть использована как тестовая для решений, полученных численно. Формула особенно эффективна для систем с большим числом панелей, для расчета которых численные методы требуют значительное время и имеют свойство накопления ошибок округления.
КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: ферма, собственные колебания, основная частота, индукция, нижняя оценка частоты, Maple
ДЛЯ ЦИТИРОВАНИЯ: Кирсанов М.Н. Lower estimate of the fundamental frequency of natural oscillations of a truss with an arbitrary number of panels // Вестник МГСУ. 2019. Т. 14. Вып. 7. С. 844-851. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2019.7. 844-851
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Frequency characteristics of building structures are required both for designing structures and for evaluating various modes of their operation. Traditionally, structural engineers solve the problem of estimating natural frequencies by numerical methods in standard packages, using mainly the finite element method [1-6]. Analytical calculations of natural frequencies resulting in a compact formula are rather rare [7-10]. In most solutions, reduced in analytical form only to the coefficients of the characteristic equations, regularity property of a calculated truss is applied. The periodicity of the truss structure [11-14] allows applying the induction method in order to obtain the dependence of the solution on the panels number. Nonlinear oscillations of trusses were studied in [15]. In [16-18], oscillations of flat elastic trusses with an orthogonal structure were studied with allowance for internal friction under the Voigt model by the method of "gluing" solutions. The dynamics of a truss with a triangular lattice and parallel belts was studied in [19]. Oscillations of truss nodes and wave processes related to them are considered in [20]. Analytical expressions for the frequencies of natural oscillations of loads concentrated in the nodes of flat trusses were obtained in the Maple system by the induction method in [21]. Papers [22-24] give some experimental results in comparison with theoretical calculations of truss oscillation frequencies.
As an object of study, the authors have chosen a flat truss with a double lattice of descending bracings and struts (Fig. 1). To derive the formula for the dependence of the fundamental frequency of natural oscillations on the panels number, the authors have applied the software program for calculating the forces in the rods of a statically definable truss written in the language of symbolic mathematics Maple [25].
The truss has n0 = 8(n + 1) rods, including 2n belt rods of length a, 2(n + 1) braces and 2n - 1 racks. Modeling the inertial properties of the structure, the same concentrated masses m were put at the nodes of the lower belt while the mass of the rods was neglected. For practical purpose. the main, lowest natural frequency of oscillation of the truss is of great interest. One can predict (or guesstimate) (this could be further verified in the research paper) that a nonlinear frequency equation of 2n - 1 order in the general case will not allow one to find this frequency in analytical form [7-10]. For the lower estimate of the desired frequency co , the well-known and sufficiently accurate lower Dunkerley estimate was applied. The formula has the form
= 1S
< П
iiï kK
о
0 CD
CD _
1 С/3 П С/3 <Q N СЯ 1
S, 9
s 9 8 3
s ( t r
t Ij
S S
is 1-й
r S
i 3 t
y о f ^
о 6
en
0 о
По
1 i П П
CD CD CD
i 1
(1) n
where œk is the frequency of oscillation of the load mk in the node k + 1 of the lower belt, in the absence of all
Fig. 1. Truss with weights in the nodes of the lower belt, n = 5
f?
л ■
. DO
■ T
s □
s у
с о
<D D
, ,
M 2
О О
л —ь
(О (О
k=1
other masses (the numbering of the nodes goes from left to right, starting from the mobile support).
The differential equation of mass oscillations
m, = m is
k
myk + dk ,„yk = 0
where yk is the vertical mass displacement, yk is the acceleration vector, d is the stiffness coefficient (k is
' k,n K
the mass number, n is the number of panels). Taking the standard form yk = Ak sin (rakt + <0 ) of deflection in such cases, the formula for estimating the partial frequency was obtained
A 4 =
8 (504a3 + 16c3 + 55h3 + 39d3 )
32h EF
= V dk ,n/m.
9 ®
O O
N N
* o
U 3
> in E (A
on *
lj
<D <u
cz £
Oft
O ^ o
co O
CD
4 °
o
c\l £
z >
CO
■E .2
ûl So
« I
CO O CO "
CD
CO c CO T3 — <u <u o o
■8
O in ® u CO >
Stiffness coefficient can be calculated by means of compliance coefficient, using the Maxwell - Mohr formula. We get:
«0-3 O(k)2i
- = V d*, = X ^.
Here Ov(i) is the force in the rod with the length lv from the unit vertical force applied to the node k, where the mass is located, while EF is the stiffness of the rod. The sum is compiled for all rods of the truss, apart from three, modeling supports. Thus, we obtain an estimate
(2)
® =y / S8k / =4 V (Anm ),
2n-1
where indicated A n = ^Sk n. If we set the task of de
riving the analytical dependence of the oscillation frequency on the number of panels, then the loadings included in (1) should also be defined in symbolic form. The algorithm for calculating the forces in the truss in the computer system of symbol mathematics Maple is well developed and tested when solving problems of deflection [25]. Using the program [25], we obtain a series of solving problems on the fundamental oscillation frequency of a truss with a successively increasing number of panels. The solution for the coefficient A« is
q„ «3 + C2« c + C3« h3 + CA„ d3
A =-
2n h2EF
(3)
where c = v a + h2, d =V4
braces. The dependence of the coefficients on the panels number has been received by induction method. We have the first four expressions:
a3 + c3 + 2h3
Ai =
A 2 =
A 3 =
2h2 EF ' 2 ( 64a3 + 8c3 + 15h3 + Id3 ) 8h2 EF '
855a3 + 43c3 + 145h3 + 91d3 18h2 EF
In order to generalize these solutions and to obtain the desired frequency, dependence on an arbitrary number n, the four solutions are not considered sufficient. The required length of the solutions sequence is determined by the capabilities of the rgf_findrecur operator of the genfunc package from the Maple system, which returns a recurrent equation to which the sequence members obey. In this case, the length turned out to be rather large compared with similar solutions previously obtained for deflection problems [25, 26]. To determine the coefficient C1 n at a3 , it is necessary to analyze 22 solutions, that could be time- and energy-consuming, taking into account the very low speed of symbolic transformations.. As a result of processing the sequence 1, 128, 855, 4032, 13 645, ..., 61 696 509, 81 474 624, a linear homogeneous recurrent equation of the eleventh order was obtained:
q« = 2C,«-, + C n - 2 - 11C n-3 + 6C,«- 4 +
+ 14C1,«-5 - 14C1,«-6 - 6q«-7 + + 11C - C - 3C + C
n-8 n-9 n-10 ^ ^1,n-11'
The solution of this equation with the initial data Cu = 1, C12 = 128, C13 = 855, ... is given by the rsolve operator:
C1n = n(64n5 + 310n3 + (375 - 15(-1)n )n2 +
+(225(-1)n - 329)« + 60((-1)n -1)) / 90. (4)
Similarly, to estimate the coefficient C2n, a sequence of length 16 was required. The equation obtained from this sequence has the form
C2,n = 4C2,n-2 - 6C2,«-4 + 4C2,n-6 - C2,n-8.
The solution of the equation is the common term of the corresponding sequence:
C2* = n (((-1)« +11) n2 + 2 ((-1)« -1)^6. (5)
For the coefficient C_ , we get the ninth order
3« °
equation
C3« = C3«-! + 4C3,«-4 - 4C3,«-3 - 6C3,«-4 +
+ 6C3,n-5 + 4C3,n-6 - 4C3,«-7 - C3,n-8 + C3,n-9 .
The solution of the equation has the form of a fourth degree polynomial.
C3n = n (18n3 +(13 - (-1)« ) n2 +
+ 3 ((-1)« - 3)« + 2 (1 - (-1)« ))/12. (6)
For the coefficient C4«, the equation turns out to be the same as for C , and the solution differs from C3 only in one term:
k=1
C. 844-851
C4>n = n (18n3-(11 + (-1)n ) n2 +
+ 3 ((-1)n - 3)n + 2 (1 - (-1)n ))/12.
(7)
Thus, dependence (2)-(3) with coefficients (4-7) determining the lower estimate of the fundamental oscillation frequency for any number of truss panels, gives the solution to the problem.
RESULTS
Consider, for example, a conventional truss made of steel rods with an elastic modulus of E = 2 • 105 MPa and cross section F = 1 sm2. Assumed panel length a = 1 m, the calculation was made for the three truss options with the number of panels n = 10, n = 11 and n = 12 in half span. In the plots (Fig. 2) of the dependence of the fundamental frequency (rad/s) on height h (in meters) extremes are observed. This feature of the solution can be applied in truss design while finding the most optimal value of the natural frequency of the structure.
The degree of approximation of the obtained estimate to the exact solution can be calculated only by solving the problem of oscillation of a 2n - 1 load system. In this case, the oscillations are described by a system of differential equations of order 2n - 1.
mY + [ Dn ]Y = 0,
(8)
where [Dn] is the stiffness matrix for the truss with n panels. Taking into account the usual replacement of the Y = A sin« + <p„), equivalent to the substitution Y = -ra2Y in such problems, we multiply (8) on the left
by the compliance matrix [BJ, the inverse of the stiffness matrix [Dn]. We obtain a homogeneous equation mra2 [Bn]Y = Y for the displacement vector that narrows the problem to determining the eigenvalues of the matrix [BJ
[ B„ ]Y = XY.
The natural frequency is equal to rak = \j^Xkm. We define the compliance matrix [Bn] by the Maxwell-
ns -3 /
Mohr's formula b. j = £ Sf S(j% (EF), where Sf is
the force in the rod v from the action of a single vertical force at node i, Sv(j) is the force in the rod v from the action of a single vertical force at node j. Figure 3 shows a comparison of the fundamental frequency received numerically (curve 1) and the found analytical estimate for Dunkerley (2). Calculations are performed for the same data as for the graphs in Fig. 2.
The spectrum of a truss with a different number of panels (n = 1, 2, ..., 6) according to the numerical solution data is displayed by the curves in Fig. 4. The frequencies in the spectrum grow non-monotonously, which is especially evident for trusses with a large number of panels. There is a noticeable sharp jump at the end of the spectrum.
It is also easy to obtain an analytical solution on the base of a numerical one applying the same scheme in the Maple system. If obtaining a solution in the form of formulas depending on the panels number is not required, then the first few eigen frequencies of the system with a small number of panels can be written out explicitly. So, with n = 2, the compliance matrix is
CO
6-
5-
n= 10 «=11 H
1=12
-/-
//
//
7/
1 2 A 5
h
< n
is kK
: 3 O
Fig. 2. Dependence of the main frequency on the truss height
o
0 CD
CD _
1 CO n CO <Q N i 1
s, 9
s 9 8 3 s ( t r
t Ij
i si
is
r s
i 3 t
><
0 .
CD
1
v 0
i ts
Ho i i H H
CD CD CD
f?
a " . DO
■ r
s □
s y c o D D
2 2 O O a -A
to to
CO,
10
\ 1
rt
8
10
& ®
O O
N N
* 0
U 3
> in
c in
aa ^
îî
<D <u
Ç Ç
1= 'g Oft
O ^ o
«3 O CD
4 °
o
c\l £
z S
CO
<u
c -ts œ
ûl 35
« I?
CO O
05 ™
9 s
CD
CO C
CO T3
— <u <u o o
E « ■8
O in ® u CO >
Fig. 3. The fundamental frequency, a = 3 m, h = 1 m. Comparison of solutions: 1 — numerical; 2 — analytical evaluation
Fig. 4. Spectra of trusses with different number of panels (rad/s), k — number of frequency in the spectrum
B =-
1
8h EF
48a3 + 8c3 + 5d3 + 13h3 4(8a3 + d3 + h3) 24a3 + 3d3 + 11h3
4(8a3 + d3 + h3) 4(8a3 + d3 + h3) 4(8a3 + d3 + h3)
24a3 + 3d3 + 11h3 4(8a3 + d3 + h3) 48a3 + 8c3 + 5d3 + 13h3
One of the roots of the frequency equation is X1 = (12a3 + 4c3 + d3 + h3 )/( 4EFh2 ).
The two other eigenvalues corresponding to the highest and lowest frequency are the roots of the quadratic equation:
X2 - 2h4 (26a3 + 2c3 + 3d3 + 7h2) XEF + +8hs (8a3 + d3 + h3)(a3 + c3 + 2h3)E2F2 = 0.
CONCLUSIONS
Considered truss scheme is not the easiest for a structural engineer. The double lattice does not permit the use of simple methods of calculating the forces, such as the method of sections or the method of successive
knots cutting. Therefore, when calculating loading, it is required to compose and solve a system of equilibrium equations for all nodes at once; and this could lead to some technical issues, in particular when calculating a truss with a large number of panels. When using symbolic transformations, the problem of count time is added to ordinary problems. This is due to the fact that symbolic transformations are performed much slower than symbolic ones. If this problem did not exist, then the formula of frequency dependence on the panels number of panels would not be required either. It would be sufficient just to set the required number of panels in the software program functioning in the Maple system and the program would give the desired dependence of the oscillation frequency on the size of the truss and the cargo mass. However, practice shows that on computers of average power (the author worked on a computer with an i7 processor), the result can actually be obtained for
a truss with 20-25 panels. The calculation of trusses with a large number of panels does not require hours, but days of work, that is not acceptable for an engineer, especially if you need to choose the number of panels, i.e. perform several calculations. Inductive method allows eliminating all the above-mentioned problems. Sequential counting for trusses with the number of panels n from 1 to 10 makes it possible to identify a pattern in the coefficients of the desired formula and to obtain a universal dependence in this formulation. Another feature of the obtained solution is the successful application of the Dunkerley estimate for fundamental frequency. This is due to the fact that the authors managed to find the exact and rather compact value of the final sum determining the frequency. A specific numerical example showed that the lower bound had proven to be quite accurate. The applied algorithm and the resulting formula can be put in practice by structural engineers for structural design.
REFERENCES
1. Branco J.M., Sousa H.S., Tsakanika E. Nondestructive assessment, full-scale load-carrying tests and local interventions on two historic timber collar roof trusses. Engineering Structures. 2017; 140:209224. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.053
2. Camara A., Nguyen K., Ruiz-Teran A.M., Stafford P.J. Serviceability limit state of vibrations in under-deck cable-stayed bridges accounting for vehicle-structure interaction. Engineering Structures. 2014; 61:61-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.030
3. Bachmann H. Vibration problems in structures: practical guidelines. Birkhuser Verlag. Basel, 1995; 234.
4. Bacinskas D., Kamaitis I.Z., Kilikevicius A. A sensor instrumentation method for dynamic monitoring of railway bridges. Journal of Vibroengineering. 2013; 15(1):176-184.
5. Bacinskas D., Turla V., Kilikevicius A., Ragauskas P., Jurevicius M. Dynamic testing of railway truss-bridge. Journal of Vibroengineering. 2014; 16(6):2649-2656.
6. Kilikevicius A., Bacinskas D., Jurevicius M., Kilikeviciene K., Fursenko A., Jakaitis J. et al. Field testing and dynamic analysis of old continuous truss steel bridge. Baltic Journal of Road & Bridge Engineering. 2018; 13(1):54-66. DOI: 10.3846/bjrbe.2018.394
7. Akhmedova E.R., Kanatova M.I. Frequency equation for a flat girder truss of a regular structure with a triangular lattice. Mathematical and Computer Simulation of Fundamental Objects and Phenomena in Computer Mathematics Systems : International Theoretical and Practical Conference ITON-2014. Kazan, Publishing House Foliant LLC, 2014; 198-199. (rus.).
8. Akhmedova E.R., Kanatova M.I. Own vibration frequencies of a flat beam truss of a regular structure. Science and Education in the 21st Century : collection of scientific papers on the materials of the International scientific-practical conference: in 17 parts. Tambov, 31 October 2014. Tambov, Ucom Consulting company Publ., 2014; 17-19. (rus.).
9. Zaborskaya N.V. On the dependence of the oscillation frequency of the load on its location on the truss. Radio electronics, electrical engineering and energy : abstracts of the Twenty-second International Scientific and Technical Conference of Students and Postgraduates: in 3 volumes. Moscow, Publishing house "Moscow Power Engineering Institute", 2016; 244. (rus.).
10. Kanatova M.I. Frequency equation and analysis of oscillations of a flat beam truss. Trends in Applied Mechanics andMechatronics. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 2015; 1:31-34. (rus.).
11. Hutchinson R.G., Fleck N.A. Microarchitec-tured cellular solids — the hunt for statically determinate periodic trusses. ZAMM. 2005; 85(9):607-617. DOI: 10.1002/zamm.200410208
12. Hutchinson R.G., Fleck N.A. The structural performance of the periodic truss. The Journal of the Mechanics and the Physics of Solids. 2006; 54(4):756-782. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.10.008
13. Zok F.W., Ryan M., Latture R.M., Beg-ley M.R. Periodic truss structures. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2016; 96:184-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.007
14. Galishnikova V.V., Ignatiev V.A. Regular core systems. Theory and methods of calculation. Volgograd, VolgGASU Publ., 2006; 551. (rus.).
< DO
is kK
o
0 CD
CD _
1 CO H CO <Q N s o
CD CD
O 3 o to
o (
S P
i S
r O
i 3
t CO
y o f -
CD CD
O o
Ho g i
i 1
CD CD CD
f?
a "
. DO
■ r
s □
s y
c o
<D D
, ,
2 2
O O
a a
to to
rn о
о о
сч N
К Ф
U 3
> (Л
С (Л
аа ^
Îi
<D <U
CZ £
1= '«?
О Ш
о ^ о
«3 О CD 44 °
о
C\l »
z s
от
15. Ufimtsev E., Voronina M. Research of the energy mechanism of steel roof truss during structurally nonlinear oscillations. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 150:1891-1897. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.188
16. Mishustin I.V., Rybakov L.S. Oscillations of plane elastic trusses of orthogonal structure. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Solid mechanics. 2003; 2:168-184. (rus.).
17. Rybakov L.S., Mishustin I.V. Own oscillations of flat regular elastic trusses of orthogonal structure. Mechanics of composite materials and structures. 1999; 5(2):3-16. (rus.).
18. Mishustin I.V., Rybakov L.S. Application of the method of concentrated masses to the analysis of natural elastic oscillations of one regular truss structure. Mechanics of composite materials and structures. 1999; 5(4):51-64. (rus.).
19. Raspopov A.S., Artemov V.E., Russu S.P. Impact of movable loads on a beam bridge modeled by a system of discrete elements. Construction. Materials Science. Engineering. Ser. : Innovative technologies of the life cycle of housing and civil, industrial and transport objects. 2008; 47:494-502. (rus.).
20. Polz D., Gfrerer M.H., Schanz M. Wave propagation in elastic trusses: An approach through retarded potentials. Wave Motion. 2018; 87:37-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2018.06.002
Received April 6, 2019
Adopted in a modified form on May 13, 2019
Approved for publication June 26, 2019
21. Kirsanov M.N., Tinkov D.V. Analytical expressions of frequencies of small oscillations of a beam truss with an arbitrary number of panels. Building mechanics and structures. 2019; 1(20):14-20. (rus.).
22. Liang Y., Li D., Song G., Feng Q. Frequency Co-integration-based damage detection for bridges under the influence of environmental temperature variation. Measurement. 2018; 125:163-175. DOI: 10.1016/j. measurement.2018.04.034
23. Zhou X., Cao L., Chen Y.F., Liu J., Li J. Experimental and analytical studies on the vibration serviceability of pre-stressed cable RC truss floor systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2016; 361:130-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.10.001
24. Jalbi S., Bhattacharya S. Closed form solution for the first natural frequency of offshore wind turbine jackets supported on multiple foundations incorporating soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2018; 113:593-613. DOI: 10.1016/j. soildyn.2018.06.011
25. Kirsanov M.N. Flat trusses. Schemes and calculation formulas. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2019; 238. (rus.).
26. Osadchenko N.V. Calculation of the deflection of a flat continuous statically definable truss with two spans. Postulate. 2017; 12:28. (rus.).
Bionotes: Mikhail N. Kirsanov — Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor of Department of robotics, mechatronics, dynamics and strength of machines; National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute (MPEI); 14 Krasnokazarmennaya st., Moscow, 111250, Russian Federation; c216@ya.ru.
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
■E .¡5
CLOT « %
CO О О) "
о ? °
Z CT ОТ с ОТ ТЗ — <u <u о о
с W ■8
О (0 ф ф
ta >
1. Branco J.M., Sousa H.S., Tsakanika E. Nondestructive assessment, full-scale load-carrying tests and local interventions on two historic timber collar roof trusses // Engineering Structures. 2017. Vol. 140. Pp. 209-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.053
2. Camara A., Nguyen K., Ruiz-Teran A.M., Stafford P.J. Serviceability limit state of vibrations in under-deck cable-stayed bridges accounting for vehicle-structure interaction // Engineering Structures. 2014. Vol. 61. Pp. 61-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.030
3. Bachmann H. Vibration problems in structures: practical guidelines, Birkhuser Verlag, Basel, 1995. 234 p.
4. Bacinskas D., Kamaitis I.Z., Kilikevicius A. A sensor instrumentation method for dynamic monitoring
of railway bridges // Journal of Vibroengineering. 2013. Vol. 15. Issue 1. Pp. 176-184.
5. Bacinskas D., Turla V., Kilikevicius A., Ragaus-kas P., Jurevicius M. Dynamic testing of railway truss-bridge // Journal of Vibroengineering. 2014. Vol. 16. Issue 6. Pp. 2649-2656.
6. Kilikevicius A., Bacinskas D., Jurevicius M., Kilikeviciene K., Fursenko A., Jakaitis J. et al. Field testing and dynamic analysis of old continuous truss steel bridge // Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering. 2018. Vol. 13 Issue 1. Pp. 54-66. DOI: 10.3846/bjrbe.2018.394
7. Ахмедова Е.Р., Канатова М.И. Частотное уравнение для плоской балочной фермы регулярной структуры с треугольной решеткой // Математиче-
С. 844-851
ское и компьютерное моделирование фундаментальных объектов и явлений в системах компьютерной математики : мат. междунар. науч.-практ. конф. ИТОН-2014. IV-й междунар. сем. и междунар. шк. Казань : Изд-во ООО «Фолиант», 2014. С. 198-199.
8. Ахмедова Е.Р., Канатова М.И. Собственные частоты колебаний плоской балочной фермы регулярной структуры // Наука и образование в XXI веке : сб. науч. тр. по мат. Междунар. науч.-практ. конф.: в 17 ч. Тамбов, 31 октября 2014. Тамбов : Консалтинговая компания Юком, 2014. С. 17-19.
9. Заборская Н.В. О зависимости частоты колебаний груза от его местоположения на ферме // Радиоэлектроника, электротехника и энергетика : тез. докл. Двадцать второй Междунар. науч.-техн. конф. студ. и асп.: в 3-х т. М. : Издательский дом «МЭИ», 2016. С. 244.
10. Канатова М.И. Частотное уравнение и анализ колебаний плоской балочной фермы // Trends in Applied Mechanics and Mechatronics. М. : Инфра-М,
2015. Т. 1. С. 31-34.
11. Hutchinson R.G., FleckN.A. Microarchitec-tured cellular solids — the hunt for statically determinate periodic trusses // ZAMM. 2005. Vol. 85. Issue 9. Pp. 607-617. DOI: 10.1002/zamm.200410208
12. Hutchinson R.G., Fleck N.A. The structural performance of the periodic truss // Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2006. Vol. 54. Issue 4. Pp. 756-782. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.10.008
13. Zok F.W., Ryan M, Latture R.M., Begley M.R. Periodic truss structures // Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2016. Vol. 96. Pp. 184-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.007
14. Галишникова В.В., Игнатьев В.А. Регулярные стержневые системы. Теория и методы расчета. Волгоград : ВолгГАСУ, 2006. 551 c.
15. Ufimtsev E., Voronina M. Research of total mechanical energy of steel roof truss during structurally nonlinear oscillations // Procedia Engineering.
2016. Vol. 150. Pp. 1891-1897. DOI: 10.1016/j.pro-eng.2016.07.188
16. Мишустин И.В., Рыбаков Л.С. Колебания плоских упругих ферм ортогональной структуры // Известия Российской академии наук. Механика твердого тела. 2003. № 2. С. 168-183.
17. Рыбаков Л.С., Мишустин И.В. Собственные колебания плоских регулярных упругих ферм
Поступила в редакцию 6 апреля 2019 г. Принята в доработанном виде 13 мая 2019 г. Одобрена для публикации 26 июня 2019 г.
ортогональной структуры // Механика композиционных материалов и конструкций. 1999. Т. 5. № 2. С. 3-17.
18. Мишустин И.В., Рыбаков Л.С. Применение метода сосредоточенных масс к анализу собственных упругих колебаний одной регулярной ферменной структуры // Механика композиционных материалов и конструкций. 1999. Т. 5. № 4. С. 51-64.
19. Распопов А.С., Артемов В.Е., Руссу С.П. Воздействие подвижных нагрузок на балочный мост, моделируемый системой дискретных элементов // Строительство, материаловедение, машиностроение. Сер. : Инновационные технологии жизненного цикла объектов жилищно-гражданского, промышленного и транспортного назначения. 2008. № 47. С. 494-502.
20. Polz D., Gfrerer M.H., Schanz M. Wave propagation in elastic trusses: An approach via retarded potentials // Wave Motion. 2018. Vol. 87. Pp. 37-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2018.06.002
21. Кирсанов М.Н., Тиньков Д.В. Аналитические выражения частот малых колебаний балочной фермы с произвольным числом панелей // Строительная механика и конструкции. 2019. № 1 (20). С. 14-20.
22. Liang Y., Li D., Song G., Feng Q. Frequency Co-integration-based damage detection for bridges under the influence of environmental temperature variation // Measurement. 2018. Vol. 125. Pp. 163-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.034
23. Zhou X., Cao L., Chen Y.F., Liu J., Li J. Experimental and analytical studies on the vibration serviceability of pre-stressed cable RC truss floor systems // Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2016. Vol. 361. Pp. 130-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.10.001
24. Jalbi S., Bhattacharya S. Closed form solution for the first natural frequency of offshore wind turbine jackets supported on multiple foundations incorporating soil-structure interaction // Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2018. Vol. 113. Pp. 593-613. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.06.011
25. Кирсанов М.Н. Плоские фермы. Схемы и расчетные формулы. М. : ИНФРА-М, 2019. 238 с.
26. Осадченко Н.В. Расчет прогиба плоской неразрезной статически определимой фермы с двумя пролетами // Постулат. 2017. № 12. 28 с.
< п
is kK
о
0 CD
CD _
1 С/3 H С/3 <Q N s О
CD CD 7
О 3 о CO
О (
S P
i S
r О
i 3
t CO
У о f -
CO CO
О О
Ho g i
i 1
Об авторе: Михаил Николаевич Кирсанов — доктор физико-математических наук, профессор кафедры робототехники, мехатроники, динамики и прочности машин; Национальный исследовательский университет «Московский энергетический институт» (НИУ «МЭИ»); 111250, г. Москва, ул. Красноказарменная, д. 14; c216@ya.ru.
CD CD CD
f?
Л "
. DO
■ т
s □
(Л У
с о
(D X
, ,
2 2
О О
л —ь
(О (О
