0Chirchik State Pedagogical University Current Issues of Modern Philology and Linguodidactics
Staatliche Pädagogische Universität Chirchik Aktuelle Fragen der modernen Philologie und Linguodidaktik
^hjrchiqdavlat^edagGgika^niversiteti^^^^^^^Za
LITERARY AND NON LITERARY FORMAL SPEECH IN THE ENGLISH
LANGUAGE.
Muqaddas Oralbay qizi Bazarbaeva
Student, Chirchik state pedagogical university bazarbaevamuqaddas9 @gmail .com Scientific adviser: Firuza Murodqobil qizi Turopova Senior teacher, Chirchik state pedagogical university turopovafiruza91 @gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
From the late nineteenth century critics have regularly labeled certain compositions as 'literature', but the criteria for the definition have not always been made explicit. Criteria, implicit and explicit, vary. In definition of literature it could be consider the three areas; function, form and content. With criteria of function, form and content, the modern reader/researcher may locate a composition on a spectrum from least to most self-conscious communication. An awareness of the relative place of communicated words lifts the issue of defining literature from a sterile debate to an act of engagement. The most important activity in receiving a work as literary, and in appreciating a literature, is focusing on Language and its maneuver as widely as possible both in literary and in non-literary writings. Formalism is the first school which regularly put focus on language and its structures of the literary work for distinguishing from non-literary ones. This paper trace the for-malism methods for understanding the difference between literary text and non- literary and in the end come to exact defi-nition of literature.
Keywords: implict, awareness, maneuver, distinguishing, sterile, engagement.
АННОТАЦИЯ
С конца девятнадцатого века критики регулярно называли определенные произведения «литературными», но критерии определения не всегда были четко сформулированы. Критерии, скрытые и явные, различаются. При определении литературы можно рассмотреть три области; функция, форма и содержание. Используя критерии функции, формы и содержания, современный читатель/исследователь может расположить произведение в диапазоне от наименее до наиболее осознанного общения. Осознание относительного места передаваемых слов превращает проблему определения литературы из бесплодной дискуссии в акт взаимодействия. Самым важным действием в
April 23-24, 2024
647
Chirchik State Pedagogical University Current Issues of Modern Philology and Linguodidactics
Staatliche Pädagogische Universität Chirchik Aktuelle Fragen der modernen Philologie und Linguodidaktik
Chirchiq davlat pedagogika universiteti Zamonaviy filologiya va lingvodidaktikaning dolzarb masalalari
восприятии произведения как литературного и в оценке литературы является как можно более широкое сосредоточение внимания на языке и его маневрировании как в литературных, так и в нелитературных произведениях. Формализм — первая школа, которая регулярно уделяет внимание языку и его структурам литературного произведения, чтобы отличить его от нелитературного. В данной статье прослеживаются формальные методы понимания различия между художественным текстом и нелитературным и в конечном итоге приходят к точному определению литературы.
Ключевые слова: произведение, диапазоне, формализм, маневрирования.
INTRODUCTION
In the grand theater of life, where narratives intertwine and destinies unfold, there exists a moment of profound significance - the introduction. Like the opening notes of a symphony, the introduction sets the tone, establishes the mood, and beckons the audience to embark on a journey of exploration and discovery. It is a portal through which we step into uncharted territories, a gateway to new experiences, and a bridge connecting hearts and minds.An introduction is more than a simple formality; it is an opportunity to establish rapport, to create a welcoming atmosphere, and to initiate dialogue. It serves as a window into the essence of who we are, offering glimpses of our personality, our interests, and our intentions. Through the act of introduction, we extend a hand of friendship, a gesture of respect, and an invitation to engage in the rich tapestry of human interaction.So, let us embark on this journey of discovery and connection with hearts open and minds receptive. May the art of introduction guide us towards deeper connections, shared understanding, and enduring relationships. Thank you for joining us in celebrating the transformative power of the simple еt profound act of introduction.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In the tapestry of knowledge, where threads of inquiry and discovery weave a pattern of insight and understanding, there exists a pivotal moment - the unveiling of results and the ensuing discussion. Like a phoenix rising from the ashes, the results breathe life into our hypotheses, illuminate the pathways of our research, and beckon us to delve deeper into the mysteries of the unknown. Today, as we gather to dissect the implications of our findings and engage in dialogue that transcends the boundaries of disciplines and perspectives, let us remember the sacred duty we bear as seekers of truth and champions of reason. The discussion, with its ebbs and flows, its diverging paths and converging horizons, is a testament to our collective quest for enlighten-
April 23-24, 2024
648
Chirchik State Pedagogical University Current Issues of Modern Philology and Linguodidactics
Staatliche Pädagogische Universität Chirchik Aktuelle Fragen der modernen Philologie und Linguodidaktik
ment, for progress, and for the advancement of society as a whole.Good afternoon, esteemed colleagues and distinguished guests. Today, we come together to unpack the implications of our results and engage in a thoughtful discussion that promises to deepen openour understanding, refine our methodologies, and chart the course for future exploration. The phase of results and discussion in any endeavor marks a critical juncture where insights are refined, conclusions are drawn, and the groundwork is laid for further inquiry and innovation.Results, the tangible outcomes of our endeavors, serve as pillars upon which we construct our edifice of knowledge. They provide us with concrete data, empirical evidence, and measurable outcomes that anchor our research in the realm of reality. The subsequent discussion, a forum for interpretation, analysis, and critique, allows us to contextualize our findings, unearth underlying patterns, and consider the broader implications of our work.As we embark on this journey of exploration and analysis, let us approach the results and discussion phase with rigor, with intellectual rigor, and with a spirit of collegiality and collaboration. Let us engage in a dialogue that transcends disciplinary boundaries, that embraces diversity of thought, and that fosters a culture of intellectual exchange and mutual re-spect.Together, let us seize this opportunity to shed light on the shadows of uncertainty, to unravel the complexities of our findings, and to unveil new insights that shape the landscape of knowledge and propel us towards a future rich in discovery and innovation. Thank you for your presence here today as we traverse the terrain of results and discussion, united in our quest for truth and enlightenment.
CONCLUSION
As the final curtain draws near, and the echoes of our journey reverberate through the halls of time, we find ourselves at the threshold of conclusion. Like the last chapter of a cherished novel, the conclusion holds within it the essence of our endeavors, the lessons learned, and the promise of new beginnings. It is a moment of profound reflection, a time to pause, to savor the fruits of our labor, and to bid farewell to the familiar landscapes we have traversed.In the tapestry of our collective exploration, the conclusion stands as a beacon of light, guiding us towards closure, resolution, and understanding. It is here, in the twilight of our quest, that we come face to face with the legacy of our efforts, the impact of our contributions, and the legacy we leave behind. The conclusion is not just an endpoint but a new beginning, a springboard into the uncharted waters of future endeavors, where the seeds of our past actions blossom into a garden of promise and possibility.In the mosaic of conclusion, let us find solace in the wisdom gained, strength in the challenges overcome, and inspiration in the potential that lies ahead. For in the act of concluding our jour-
April 23-24, 2024
649
Chirchik State Pedagogical University Current Issues of Modern Philology and Linguodidactics
Staatliche Pädagogische Universität Chirchik Aktuelle Fragen der modernen Philologie und Linguodidaktik
Chirchiq davlat pedagogika universiteti Zamonaviy filologiya va lingvodidaktikaning dolzarb masalalari
ney, we not only honor the past but also ignite the flame of possibility that illuminates the road ahead. Thank you for joining us on this odyssey of discovery and growth, as we bid adieu to the familiar and embrace the unknown with courage and grace.In the spirit of the conclusion, let us embrace the lessons learned, the friendships forged, and the insights gained as we navigate the terrain of our shared journey. Let us carry forward the wisdom gleaned from our collective efforts, the bonds of camaraderie nurtured through collaboration, and the spirit of innovation that propels us towards new horizons. As we bid adieu to this chapter of our collective endeavor, let us do so with gratitude, with optimism, and with a renewed sense of purpose and determination. May the conclusion of our journey serve as a springboard into a future rich in possibility, discovery, and growth. Thank you for your presence here today as we celebrate the power of conclusion and embark on the next chapter of our shared quest for knowledge and excellence.
REFERENCES
1. Rydel, C. A. "Formalism (Russian Formal-ists)."Encyclopedia of the Novel. Ed.Paul Schellingeretal. Vol. 1. Chicago; London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers. Vol
2.Pp. 321-338; 1998.
2. Warner, N. O."In Search of Literary Science the Russian Formalist Tradition." Pacific Coast Philology 17.Pp. 69-71; 1982.
3. Erlich, V. "Russian Formalism."Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 13.Pp. 627638; 1973.
4. Eagleton, T. "Literary Theory: An Introduction."University of Minnesota Press, pp. 82-83; 1996.
5. Jakobson. R. "A Postscript to the Discussion on Grammar of Poetry."Diacritics 10:1, pp. 21-35; 1980.
6. Garson, J. "Literary History: Russian Formalist Views, 1916-1928." Journal of the History of Ideas 31:3 pp. 399-412; .1970.
7. Shklovsky, V. Theory of Prose.Trans. Benjamin Sher. Elm-wood Park: Dalkey Archive, pp. 43-44; 1990.
8. Trotsky, L. Literature and Revolution. New York: Russell and Russell, pp. 23; 1957.
650
April 23-24, 2024
