CC BY
0ARTICLE INFO
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH
Innovative Academy Research Support Center UIF = 8.1 | SJIF = 7.899 www.in-academy.uz
INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION ASSESSMENT SYSTEM Xujamurodov Odil Marifboy ugli
Teacher of the Gulistan Presidential school
Abdullayev Khurshid Abdusalom ugli Teacher of the Gulistan Presidential school
Botirov Jamshid Kuchkor ugli Teacher of the Gulistan Presidential school
Radjabov Khasan Ravshan ugli Teacher of the Gulistan Presidential school https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11633900 ABSTRACT
Received: 06th June 2024 Accepted: 12th June 2024 Online: 13th June 2024
KEYWORDS Evaluation criteria, rating indicators.
The criteria for rating higher education institutions in developed nations, as well as the criteria for defining the national ranking of higher education institutions in the Republic of Uzbekistan, are analyzed and compared in this thesis. The flaws in the national rating system are discussed, as well as solutions.
Our country's education is undergoing extensive reforms and reconstruction has experienced and is undergoing a complex process of implementation. Of them The intended goal is to democratize the school's activities, humanize it development of principles, based on this, the content of educational work, its form and consists of a comprehensive update and further improvement of the style. Updated education in its full meaning means a new way of thinking, a healthy mind. In the current era equal to the value, prestige and influence of education in the performers of the unnig it is necessary to have initiative, selflessness and business acumen.
Learning has been valued in our country since ancient times. Knowledgeable people are the pride of the country those who are That's why it is the service of our country to get knowledge and the acquired knowledge. It is our highest human duty to serve in the way One of the important conditions for the solution is foreign school and pedagogy experiences is learning. Education through careful and diligent study of international experiences get rid of frozen, losing their relevance work forms and styles in addition to being, it has additional rich resources in updating it properly we will be
The rating is a way of measuring the quality of education in higher education institutions, and it is intended to provide information on the prestige of educational institutions to educational service customers, such as students, staff, and educational authorities. The ranking is based on a set of indicators that indicate the university's activities or current areas of education and specialties, and it establishes the university's place in the educational system. A rating is a number that expresses the superiority of one educational institution over another and is frequently derived as a conditional integral indication based on a number of individual factors. The purpose of the ranking is to improve the quality of educational services:
é
UIF = 8.1 | SJIF = 7.899
www.in-academy.uz
• the expansion and advancement of the educational services market;
• the objective of the educational system is to offer authorities, employees, parents, and students with information on the authority of educational institutions.
• Based on past experience, the rating is primarily used to evaluate the three types of indicators listed below:
• Evaluation of performance indicators;
• evaluation of indicators describing the current situation of the educational institution;
• evaluation of indicators obtained through the institution's internal capability.
• A special place in this is given to the assessment of the conditions created for students to receive quality education, the indicators of employment of students in their specialties.
The methods for arranging and calculating educational institution rankings are varied, and they are strongly tied to country education systems and methods of evaluating higher education. A number of international countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Poland, the Netherlands, Spain, Japan, China, Russia, and Ukraine, are now rich in determining and applying educational institution ratings. Their current ranking systems are based on various methodologies dependent on the educational system's peculiarities.
In the United States, rankings are based on three categories of quality indicators: student achievement, faculty achievement, and the university's academic promise. These indicators are converted into ratings using the weighting and aggregate approach. In the United Kingdom, the media determines the rating based on statistical data. Scientific work is also included in the list of indicators. One of the most important factors is consumer perceptions of the educational institution. The German rating system, which determines the ranking of specialties, is primarily developed for school graduates. As a result, universities are classified as good, average, or awful. The evaluation is based on information about the universities and the cities in which they are located, the student population, fundamental course and training information, employment, the labor market, and faculty and student opinions.
In Poland, university rankings are done on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration their unique qualities (ranking of universities, ranking of private universities, ranking of creative universities). The results of the previous year's rating are also factored into the ranking. Private institutions are ranked based on surveys completed directly within the university as well as surveys conducted among employers and professors.
In Japan, university rankings are based on three factors: instructional activities, research activities, and development contributions. Student polls have become increasingly popular in recent years.
Since 2001, a ranking of Russian higher education institutions has been conducted. Currently, there are two types of rating models: the Ministry of Education's rating and the media's rating. The rating in the first model is based on expert opinion and statistics, but employers' opinions are given less weight. The second model is more self-contained, although it lacks a strong scientific foundation. A nongovernmental rating organization was developed to take into account the beneficial characteristics of these two approaches.
é
UIF = 8.1 | SJIF = 7.899
www.in-academy.uz
To improve the quality of education in Uzbekistan's higher education institutions, to identify gaps, and to promote competitiveness on the basis of assessment and comparison of education quality in Uzbekistan's higher education institutions. The State Testing Center under the Cabinet of Ministers is responsible for determining the ranking of higher education institutions. The center annually provides the Government with analytical information on the development of higher education in the country on the basis of the currently approved methodology for compiling ratings.
The teaching staff of the top 300 higher education institutions in the world with the level of foreign higher education institutions (PhD) at the level of foreign higher education institutions (POD) share, level of teaching quality, number of textbooks and manuals published by teachers of higher education institutions during the year, share of foreign teachers and foreign students, and exchange programs with foreign higher education institutions are all included in the index of teaching quality. The number of areas of education (specialties) taught in a foreign language, the level of understanding of foreign languages and information and communication technologies, and the amount of laboratory and auxiliary equipment use in the educational process are all factors to consider.
As a result, credit technology is at the heart of international education integration. Scientific and technical progress had achieved its pinnacle by the second half of the twentieth century. The integration and cooperation of scientists and researchers from many countries, as well as higher education institutions, is clearly necessary for the advancement of scientific technology. Schools will be able to self-assess and identify current problems, and parents will get the information they need about their children's education as a result of this.
One of the directions that is currently developing widely in the field of education is the use of modern pedagogical technologies. It is known that the educational process consists in the teaching of the older generation of their knowledge and experience to the growing generation, in this process, the transmission of information necessary mainly for human life from generation to generation is carried out. There are different definitions of pedagogical technology, each definition represents an approach from a certain point of view. Let's look at some basic definitions and their interpretations. . Pedagogical technology is a complex of psychological procedures, which determines the totality and component (location)of teaching, forms of education, methods, methods, Pathways, Educational means: it consists of organizational and methodological tools of the pedagogical process.
By carefully and diligently studying the international experiences, we will get rid of the work forms and methods that have become frozen in education and are losing their relevance, and we will have additional rich resources for updating it in a proper way. The head of our state said that there is a personnel problem in the country, and all fields need modern specialists who are compatible with the pace of reforms. For this purpose, the entire education system is being improved. The development of pre-school education is a good foundation for school lessons. The quality of general secondary education is being improved based on advanced international experience and contemporary requirements. Modern and innovative educational institutions, such as presidential schools, specialized schools named after our great scholars, creative schools, and schools of Temurbeks, were established. The
é
Ws,
References:
1. Хамидов О.Х., Кагоров о.С. (2021). Development issues of innovative economy in the agricultural sector, 539-543 p.
2. Kahhorov O.S. (2017). Improving methodological base of evaluation of management effectiveness in educational institutions. Экономика и предпринимательство. №1, p. 10171019.
3. Таълим сифатини бах,олашнинг таъсирчан механизмлари жорий этилади -Президент фармони лойих,аси. https://yuz.uz/news/talim-sifatini-baholashning-tasirchan-mexanizmlari-joriy-etiladi--prezident-farmoni-loyihasi
4. G.Anorqulkova, A. Karimov.Xorijiy mamlakatlar ta'lim tizimining o'ziga xos yo'nalishi uslub va tahlili. Xalq ta'limi ilmiy metodik jurnali. 2017-yil. 3-son.
5. Kakhkhorov O.S. (2017). The main approaches to management effectiveness evaluation in educational institutions. The Way of Science. № 2 (36). P. 127.
6. Maftuna, G. (2021). Effective ways to Use Triz (The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) in Elementary School. Pindus Journal of Culture, Literature, and ELT, 9, 85-88.
7. Ganieva, M. (2023). EMPOWERING LOGICAL THINKING IN PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH TIPS TECHNOLOGY. In Academic International Conference on Multi-Disciplinary Studies and Education (Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 62-63).
