CC BY
37HISTORY OF ORIGIN OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION
To'raqulova D.Q.
To 'raqulova Dilafruz Qahharovna - teacher, INTERFACULTY ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT, BUKHARA STATE UNIVERSITY, BUKHARA, REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Abstract: this article is about to analyze the extent to which social and cultural factors are used in teaching a foreign language. The effects, the positive and negative aspects of socio-cultural factors in education are illustrated through examples.
Keywords: intercultural communication, linguopragmatics, frazeological linguistics, cotseptology, lexicography, lingvodidactic linguistics, socio-economic class, regional group, linguoculturology.
The aspects of intercultural communication in contemporary issues of modern linguistics. The emphasis has been on language linguistics and linguistic attribution (linguopragmatics) ever more than ever. As a result, the study of the language in the following three units has become one of the most urgent issues of today's linguistics. In this aspect of the study of human lively speech, there are areas such as ethnolinguistics and linguoculturology (linguistic sciences) emerging on the ground. Although linguistics is a new direction in linguistics, its new branches, such as: frazeological linguistics, cotseptology, lexicography, lingvodidactic linguistics, have emerged. All this is about studying human speech, living speech. The fact that the cooperation between the peoples of the world in different spheres is expanding requires such new areas and directions of linguistics. Because people of different nationalities can not communicate with people of different nationalities without knowing it. This is why people living in different regions of the world who speak foreign languages or one language are required to know the specificity of their interaction when learning communication behavior. Intercultural communication is a must-have in every foreign language lesson. Cultures can be compared in it. In this process, it is known that dialect study is aimed at studying the social features of social groups, which are distinguished from other members of society by their own language, but most sociologists are closely related to their field of dialectics n the form of images. It should be noted that dialectology differs greatly from modern sociology in terms of its main interest.
Dialectology and sociology are another place in the selection of the first unit of analysis. Dialectology interprets language and dialects as integral structures. These lines should have distinctive lines that are clearly visible: the isoglosses, ie, the lines that combine the same language features in the linguistic map, depend entirely upon this interpretation.
Sociology is focused on concentrating attention on social groups and fluent language fluid units, and involving these variables in social sciences: age, gender, particular socioeconomic class, regional group, as well as traditional demographic units. At the same time, there are attempts to establish relationships between language forms and social functions at a macro level, interacting with groups, at a micro level, in addition to group interactions, language and social functions . It also regrets that the shortcomings and deficiencies in the field of dialectology, including the lack of theoretical overdoskedness, have long been pessimistic. As far as language is concerned, the communication process is related not only to the dialect, but also to the mentality.
In this context, the influence of the geographical environment in social life and the process of communication is influenced by ancient Greek scholars Democritus, Hippocrates, Geradot, Polybi, Strabo, Humbolt, in his works.
By the middle of the XIX century, in the XVIII century French thinker SH. The geographical environment of each country by Monteske is its morality and
the laws of the state of affairs, were revived and began to be expressed in public-political views. One of the geographical school trends at the turn of the 20th century, E.Hatington,
one of the American environmentalist educators, also affects the health, physical and ethical performance of the population, and labor productivity. that the increasing emphasis on environmental and human impact on human beings gradually creates a special science called Intercultural Communication. The first "Intercultural Dialogue", first used by American scientist Hull, was originally understood as an integral part of the sociology, but later a special science was formed, not only in the social sciences, but also in pedagogy, linguistics, and modern and began to engage in economics and law professionals.
The concept of "intercultural dialogue" has become a commonly used term in the pedagogical, psychological and didactic literature. Each of these fields examines and analyzes the phenomenon of intercultural communication from a variety of perspectives. Therefore, the concept of "intercultural dialogue" may change slightly from the point of view of one another. The concept of "intercultural communication" has its own attribute and place in the field of pedagogy.
The new field, called linguistics, philology, culture, pedagogy, is called the "Theory and Practice of Intercultural Communication" for a scientifically accurate representation of the notion of culture (Dialogue Communication, ing. Culturell communication), psychology, psychology, psychology, ethnology, and identifying their position. Nowadays foreign languages are intercultural communication.
References
1. Atay, D., G. Kurtl., Z. Qamlibel., P. Ersin., and O. Kaslioglu., The Role of Intercultural Competence in Foreign Language, 2009.
2. Brown H D, Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents, 1994.
3. Byram, M., Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, England: Multicultural Matters, 1997.
4. Candlin, C., Language, culture, and curriculum. Language, culture and curriculum, 1992.
5. Damen, L., Culture Learning: The fifth dimension in the classroom. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1987.
6. Kramsch, C., Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
