CC BY
0Genotype x Sex Interaction Effects on Carcass Traits of Three Strains of Commercial Broiler Chickens
S.O. OLAWUMI*, S.O. FAJEMILEHIN and S.S. FAGBUARO
Department of Animal Production and Health Sciences, Ekiti State University, P.M.B. 5363, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
Corresponding author's email: olawumisimeon@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to rank commercial broiler chicken breeds vis-à-vis their sexes based on their carcass evaluation at 56days of age. The strains were Marshall, Arbor Acre and Hubbard, and the traits considered were live weight, dressing weight and percent, eviscerated weight, carcass weight and percent, breast muscle, back muscle, thigh, drumstick, head, neck, wing and leg weights. Other traits measured were wing and leg lengths, edible giblets and abdominal fat. There was highly significant (P<0.01) strain x sex interaction effects on all the traits evaluated with the exception of leg length, liver, gizzard and abdominal fat. Males and females of Marshall broilers recorded superior and higher (P<0.01) mean values in almost all the traits than the sexes of the other two strains. The obtained results indicate that most carcass traits are breed and sex dependent. In addition, the result showed that both sexes of Marshall broilers produced greater chicken proportions than Arbor Acre and Hubbard broilers. Therefore, important interventions to increase animal proteins consumption in this country, both sexes of Marshall broilers could be raised, and also for maximum profit for stockholders and processing industries. Keywords: Trait, strain, carcass %, dressing % and sex
JWPR
Journal of World's Poultry Research
J. World's Poult. Res. 2(1): 21-24, 2012
© 2011. Scienceline Publication
INTRODUCTION
White meat such as chicken meat according to Jaturasitha et al. (2008) is superior to red meat in health aspects because of its comparatively low content of fat, cholesterol, and more importantly for men, Iron. Chicken meat is unique in that its price is comparatively low, easy to partition into smaller parts and no religious restriction against its consumption (Jaturasitha, 2004). There are several factors affecting the productive and carcass performance of broiler chickens, and these include breed or strain, sex, nutrition, housing and stocking rate. Genotype according to Jaturasitha et al. (2004a) and Chaosap and Tuntirisoottianli (2006) plays a major role in carcass fatness while, Klonti et al. (1998) found significant breed influence on meat quality traits especially muscle fibre and sizes.
Literature is replete with information regarding breed effect on carcass characteristics. It was reported that breed significantly affected live weight (Shalin and Elazeem, 2005; Musa et al., 2006; Jaturasitha et al., 2008), carcass weight (Ojedapo et al., 2008; Olawumi and Fagbuaro, 2011), breast and leg muscle weight (Musa et al., 2006), fat and edible giblets weight (Musa et al., 2006; Ojedapo et al., 2008) and back and drumstick weights (Ojedapo et al., 2008) of broiler chickens. Some previous studies also observed
significant sex effect on live weight (Shahin and Elazeem, 2005) and carcass traits (Meckley et al., 1980; Wiseman and Lewis, 1998; Shahin and Elazeem, 2005; Ojedapo et al., 2008) of broiler chicken breeds.
While separate effects of breed and sex on carcass characteristics had been widely reported in literature, their interactions have not been given much attention. This refers to the ranking of breeds and sexes on a scale of performance in respect of those traits measured. Andrews et al. (1975) and Tarrago and Puchal (1977) found significant strain x sex interactions on live weight. In contrast, Shahin and Elazeem (2005) and Ojedapo et al. (2008) observed insignificant strain x sex interactions on carcass traits of broiler chickens. The latter results implied that there was absence of joint effect of breed and sex on birds' performance, that is, the two factors acted independently of each other. Furthermore, Ajayi and Ejiofor (2009) reported significant genotype x sex effect on live weight and body linear measurements in broiler breeds. In addition, Shahin and Elazeem (2005) found significant sex x diet interactions on carcass fat and boneless carcass (meat) but an insignificant breed x sex and breed x diet interactions on proportions of total muscle, total meat and total fat weights. The present investigation was aimed at finding the strain and sex of broiler chickens with superior carcass value in order to rank them. Breed
TolStSTmlatpaffigil Olawumi S.O., Fajemilerhin S.O. and Fagbuaro S.S. 2012. Genotype x sex interaction effects on carcass traits of three strains of commercial broiler chickens. J. World's Poult. Res. 2(1): 21-24. EBlIBn http://jwpr.science-line.com/
|To cite this paper:|
x sex interaction effects refers to the ranking order of the breeds' performance based on their sexes. The existence of interactions between breed and sex would indicate the presence of sexual dimorphism in carcass evaluation within and between breeds. Specifically, the study will reveal among other things:
a. breed with superior carcass value
b. sex within breed with superior carcass value
c. sexes between breeds with superior carcass value.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study location
The study was carried out at the Animal Breeding Unit, Teaching and Research Farm, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti between September, 2010 and December, 2010. Ado-Ekiti is situated along latitude 70311 and 70491 North of the Equator and longitude 50711and 50271East of the Greenwich meridian. The city falls under Derived Savannah zone. The city enjoys two separate seasonal periods namely, Rainy (May-October) and Dry (November-April) seasons.
Management and experimental birds
A total number of 150 broiler day-old chicks, that, is 50 chicks each of Arbor Acres, Mashall and Hubbard were purchased from local hatcheries and raised on deep litter in separate pens for 56days (8weeks). The chicks were brooded using coal pot to supply heat for the first three weeks of life. Antibiotics and vitamins were administered as and when due. Also, vaccines against Infectious Bursae and Newcastle diseases were given at specified age intervals. Their beddings are made up of dry wood shavings to prevent coccidiosis outbreak and high level of hygiene was maintained throughout the experimental period to ensure unhindered conducive environment for growth, and to lower death rate. The birds were fed ad libitum with starter mash (1-4weeks) containing 3000Kcal/KgME, 22%CP and finisher feed (5-8weeks) containing 3100Kcal//KgMe, 21%CP.
Data collection
At exactly 56 days of age, 10birds (5males, 5females) from each breed were randomly selected after starving them overnight. The birds were numbered and weighed individually to obtain live body weight, and thereafter, slaughtered, bled, scalded and plucked. After the removal of feathers, the carcasses were eviscerated and dissected manually into various parts such as breast muscle, back muscle, drumstick, thigh muscle, wings, legs and giblets (heart, liver and gizzard). The different parts were measured using sensitive scale and tape rule, and were expressed in grammes and centimetres, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance and the differences between means for breed x sex interactions were separated by Duncan New Multiple Range test as per SAS (2001).
The appropriate statistical model used was:
Yijk = ^ + Gj + Si + (GS)ij + eljk
Yijk= observation of the k^ population, of the jth genotype and ith sex
common mean
Gj= fixed effect of jth genotype (j=3)
Si = fixed effect of ith sex (i=2)
(GS)ij= fixed genotype x sex interaction effects
eijk= random error
RESULTS
Table 1 showed the least square means for strain x sex interaction effects on carcass traits of broiler chicken breeds. There was highly significant (P<0.01) breed x sex interaction effects on live weight, dressing weight, dressing percent, eviscerated weight, carcass weight and carcass percent.
Table 2 also presented strain x sex interaction effects on carcass proportions. There was highly significant (P<0.01) breed x sex interactions on breast muscle weight, back muscle weight, thigh weight, drumstick weight, head weight, neck weight, wing weight, wing length and leg weight.
Furthermore, least square means showing breed x sex interactions on edible giblets and abdominal fat were given in Table 3. There was no significant (P>0.05) strain x sex interaction effects on all giblets with the exception of heart weight.
DISCUSSIONS
The result of this study indicates that live weight in broiler chickens was breed and sex dependent, that is, birds' body weight vary according to their sexes. In this study, males and females of Marshall recorded significantly (P<0.01) higher mean values than the other two breeds' sexes. It implies that both sexes of Marshall broilers recorded the highest live weight at 56 days when compared to Arbor Acre and Hubbard chickens. The former therefore, could be described as having superior genetic potentials for meat yield since the males and females of the breed gave higher mean values than the males and females of the latter. The lowest mean values were obtained for females of Arbor Acre and Hubbard. The results indicate that live weight is dependent on interaction between breed and sex of broiler chickens, and this was consistent with the findings of Ajayi and Ejiofor (2009) and Razuki et al. (2011) who reported significant breed x sex interactions on body weight of chicken breeds, but contradicted those of Ojedapo et al. (2008) who found no significant strain x sex interactions on live weight.
With regard to dressing weight, males and females of Marshall broilers had highest mean values than both sexes of Arbor Acre and Hubbard chickens. This also implies that this trait is breed and sex dependent, and that Marshall performed better, and superior to other two breeds at the same age, and under uniform management conditions. On dressing percent, both sexes of the three breeds recorded similar mean values except Arbor Acre males which had the least. In the current study, eviscerated weight of broiler chicken breeds was also breed and sex dependent, that is, significant differences were observed among breeds, and between sexes within the breeds. Males and females of Marshall were found to have highest mean values than other two breeds.
To cite this paper:
| Olawumi S.O., Fajemilerhin S.O. and Fagbuaro S.S. 2012. Genotype : commercial broiler chickens. J. World's Poult. Res. 2(1): 21-24. Journamomspagea http://jwpr.science-line.com/
sex interaction effects on carcass traits of three strains of
Table 1. Least square means showing strain x sex interaction effects on live weight and carcass traits of broiler chickens
Breeds
Traits
Marshall
Hubbard
Arbor Acre
P-value
M F M F M F
Live weight (g) 2320a 2310a 2190ab 1850b 2170ab 1850b 0.001
Dressing weight (g) 2200a 2140a 2040ab 1730b 1940ab 1740b 0.001
Dressing percent (%) 94.60a 92.60a 93.26a 93.46a 89.34b 94.06a 0.001
Eviscerated weight (g) 1960a 1870a 1780a 1500b 1690ab 1500b 0.001
Carcass weight (g) 1820a 1770a 1680ab 1400b 1560ab 1390b 0.001
Carcass percent (%) 78.28a 76.62a 76.66a 75.70a 71.60b 75.10a 0.001
5 means along rows with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.01); NS= Non-significant (P>0.05)
Table 2. Least square means showing breed x sex interaction effects on carcass proportions of broiler chicken breeds
Breeds
Traits
Marshall
Hubbard
Arbor Acre
P-value
M F M F M F
Breast muscle weight (g) 549.60a 492.0ab 447.60abc 376.0c 406.0bc 391.0bc 0 .001
Back weight (g) 333.20a 326.60ab 315.60abc 262.20bc 298.40abc 252.80c 0 .001
Thigh weight (g) 257.20a 251.0a 223.0ab 193.0b 229.60ab 184.80b 0 .001
Drumstick weight (g) 248.80a 224.80ab 211.0ab 161.20c 206.0b 169.20c 0 .001
Head weight (g) 57.60a 46.80bc 48.0bc 42.20c 50.20b 45.40bc 0 .001
Neck weight (g) 128.20a 117.60ab 110.40abc 100.80bc 110.40abc 85.60c 0 .001
Wing weight (g) 190.0a 180.20a 171.0ab 147.80b 171.0ab 147.0b 0 .001
Wing length (cm) 25.60a 23.08ab 23.46ab 19.88c 24.12ab 22.16bc 0 .001
Leg weight (g) 99.80a 82.0b 90.0ab 62.60c 89.0ab 63.80c 0 .001
Leg length (cm) 7.26 6.40 7.40 6.50 7.46 7.14 NS
c means along rows with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.01); NS= Non-significant (P>0.05)
Table 3. Least square means showing breed x sex interaction effects on edible giblets and abdominal fat of broiler
chicken breeds
Traits
Breeds
Marshall
Hubbard
Arbor Acre
P-value
M F M F M F
Liver weight (g) 45.40 44.20 42.20 43.60 41.40 37.80 NS
Gizzard weight (g) 45.40 44.60 44.80 40.60 45.20 42.40 NS
Heart weight (g) 10.80ab 11.20a 10.80ab 9.20b 9.80ab 9.20b 0.001
Abdominal fat weight (g) 22.80 21.80 19.20 23.60 19.60 19.80 NS
5 means along rows with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.01); NS= Non-significant (P>0.05)
In addition, carcass weight and carcass percentage differed between sexes, within and between breeds. As usual, Marshall still recorded highest mean values in carcass weight than Arbor Acre and Hubbard birds. The former was good and superior to the latter in this trait, and the obtained result disagreed with Ojedapo et al. (2008) who observed non-significant strain x sex interactions on carcass weight. The obtained results so far revealed that breed and sex acted jointly on birds' carcass performance, and that males and females of Marshall breed were better in terms of growth and slaughter traits than the other two breeds.
Pertaining to carcass proportions, males and females of Marshall breed recorded significant higher mean values than other two breeds. The results indicate that males and females of Marshall produced more meat from breast, back, thigh and drumstick parts. In fact, the females of Arbor Acre and Hubbard had lowest mean values in all these traits. The result contradicts that of Ojedapo et al. (2008) who reported an insignificant strain x sex interactions on shank, thigh and drumstick weights. This same trend was observed for head weight, neck weight, wing weight, wing length and leg weight.
This study on chicken parts indicate that all these traits are breed and sex dependent, that is, breeds differ
in carcass proportions, and that these differences are strongly connected to their sexes. In the present study, males and females of Marshall were superior in all the traits measured, while females of Arbor Acre and Hubbard appeared to be the poorest in terms of meat yield. However, no significant (P>0.05) breed x sex interactions was indicated for leg length in this study.
There was no significant (P>0.05) breed x sex interactions on liver weight and gizzard weight in this study. Both sexes within and between breeds recorded similar mean values, and this corroborates the findings of Ojedapo et al. (2008) who found insignificant strain x sex interactions on these traits. As regards heart weight, significant breed x sex interactions were found between sexes, within and between breeds. Males and females of Marshall, males of Arbor Acre and Hubbard were superior to females of Arbor Acre and Hubbard. There was no significant breed x sex interactions on abdominal fat, that is, breed and sex acted independently on this trait.
In general, the significant strain differences in live weight and carcass traits of broilers observed in this study implies that these three broiler chicken breeds have different ancestors, that is, they have different genetic constitutions.
TBBnBBhflsBflBBri Olawumi S.O., Fajemilerhin S.O. and Fagbuaro S.S. 2012. Genotype x sex interaction effects on carcass traits of three stra commercial broiler chickens. J. World's Poult. Res. 2(1): 21-24. EESBHEEmSSgei http://jwpr.science-line.com/
|To cite this paper:|
CONCLUSIONS
• This study revealed that most carcass traits are breed and sex dependent.
• Males were found to be heavier than females within and between breeds.
• Males and females of Marshall broilers ranked highest in most of the traits considered for evaluation.
• The study revealed that Marshall breed significantly weighed more than the other two breeds at 56th day, and that the commercial limbs of its females represented more of the carcass than even the males of the other two breeds.
• The three broiler strains have different ancestors and genetic constitutions judging from the obtained results in this study.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are indebted to the Staff of Teaching and Research Farm, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, for their support and assistance during the period of data collection.
REFERENCES
Ajayi FO and Ejiofor O (2009). Effects of genotype x sex interaction on growth and some development characteristics of Ross and Anak broiler strains in the high rain forest zone of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 1-6. Andrews LD, Nelson GS, Harris GC and Goodwin TL (1974). Performance of five strains of broilers in a four-tier cage system with plastic mat floors. Poultry Science, 54: 54-58. Chaosap C and Tuntivisoottikul K (2006). Carcass quality and some muscle properties of broiler native, Sritong and Tanawsri chickens. Proc. 43rd Annu. Conf. Kasetsart Univ., Bangkok, Thailand. pp.52-60. Jaturasitha S (2004). Meat management. Mingmuang
Press, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Jaturasitha S, Khiaosaard R, Pongpaew A, Leawtharakul A, Saitong S, Apichatsarangkul T and Leaungwunta V (2004a). Carcass and indirect meat quality of native and Kai Baan chickens with different sex and slaughter weight. Proc. 42nd Annu. Conf. Kasetsart Univ., Bangkok, Thailand. pp.116-126.
Jaturasitha S, Srikanchai T, Kreuzer M and Wicke M (2008). Differences in carcass and meat characteristics between chicken indigenous to Northern Thailand (Black boned and Thai native) and imported extensive breeds (Bresse and Rhode Island Red). Poultry Science, 87: 160-169.
Klont RE, Brocks l and Eikelenboom G (1998). Muscle fibre type and meat quality. Meat Science, 49: 219-229.
Merkley JW, Weinland BT, Malone GW and Chaloupka GW(1980). Evaluation of five commercial broiler crosses. 2. Eviscerated yield and component parts. Poultry Science, 59: 17551760.
Musa HH, Chen GH, Cheng JH, Li BC and Mekki DM (2006). Study on carcass characteristics of chicken breeds raised under the intensive condition. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5(6): 530-533.
Olawumi SO and Fagbuaro S (2011). Productive Performance of three commercial broiler genotypes reared in the Derived Savannah Zone of Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(11): 798-804.
Ojedapo LO, Akinokun O, Adedeji TA, Olayeni TB, Ameen SA and Amao SR (2008). Effect of strain and sex on carcass characteristics of three commercial broilers reared on deep litter system in the Derived Savannah area of Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(4): 487-491.
Razuki WM, Mukhlis SR, Jasim FH and Hamad RF (2011). Productive performance of four broiler genotypes reared under high ambient temperature. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10(2): 87-92.
Shahin KA and Elazeem FA (2005). Effects of breed and sex and diet and their interactions on carcass composition and tissue weight distribution of broiler chickens. Arch Tierzil 48: 612-626.
Statistical Analysis System SAS, (2001). SAS Users Guide. Statistics, 8th edition, SAS Institute Cary, NC, USA.
Tarrago J and Puchal F (1977). Effect of strain, sex, and stocking rate on the performance and carcass yield of caged broilers. British Poultry Science, 18: 95-99.
Wiseman J and Lewise CE (1998). Influence of dietary energy and nutrient concentration on the growth of body weight and carcass components of broiler chickens. Journal of Agricultural Science, 131: 361-371.
T3B3taEh33BSSB5l Olawumi S.O., Fajemilerhin S.O. and Fagbuaro S.S. 2012. Genotype x sex interaction effects on carcass traits of three strains of commercial broiler chickens. J. World's Poult. Res. 2(1): 21-24.
mamm http://jwpr.science-line.com/ ,
|To cite this paper:|
