CC BY
59
Protistology 6 (4), 236-244 (2010/11)
Protistology
Flagellar apparatus structure of Thaumatomonas (Thaumatomonadida) and thaumatomonad relationships
Sergey A. Karpov
Zoological Institute RAS, and St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Summary
The precise phylogenetic relationship of thaumatomonads to other Cercozoa based on molecular phylogeny is not clear. To clarify the position of thaumatomonads among other cercozoan flagellates the flagellar apparatus structure was studied in two species of Thaumatomonas: T. seravini and T. lauterborni. The root system of both species is composed of 4 microtubular roots, which are homologous to those of cercomonads. The kinetosome of the anterior flagellum has two microtubular roots (da and vp2), the kinetosome of the posterior flagellum has a vp1 microtubular root and a fibrillar one. An additional left root originates between the kinetosomes. Comparison of flagellar apparatus structure of Thaumatomonas with those of other well investigated cercozoans revealed (1) a highly conservative set of roots among studied Cercozoa, and (2) that thaumatomonads are morphologically most similar to the glissomonads Bodomorpha and Katabia.
Key words: Thaumatomonas, thaumatomonads, flagellar apparatus, phylogeny, taxonomy, 3D reconstruction
Introduction
Thaumatomonads are heterotrophic gliding flagellates with two heterodynamic flagella. Their cell surface is covered with siliceous scales formed on the surface of tubulocristate mitochondria (Swale and Belcher 1974, 1975; Karpov and Zhukov, 1987; Karpov, 1993), which is unique among protists (Karpov, 1990, 2000). A ventral groove produces temporary branching filopodia for feeding. Extrusomes are represented by kinetocysts.
Some species may produce multinuclear and multiflagellar plasmodia in their complex life cycle, which includes several stages: flagellate, filopodial amoeba (flagella present, but invisible), plasmodium and cyst (Shirkina, 1987; Karpov 1990; Vickerman et al., 1991).
In most recent classifications (Cavalier-Smith and Chao 2003; Adl et al., 2005) the order Thaumatomonadida (Shirkina) Karpov, 1990 includes only one family Thaumatomonadidae Hollande 1952; as Howe et al. (2010) pointed out, a more
© 2010 by Russia, Protistology
recent synonym, Thaumatomastigidae Patterson et Zollfel, 1991 is nomenclaturally invalid. Based on new ultrastructural and sequence data, Howe et al. (2010) established a second thaumatomonad family, Peregriniidae including two genera: Peregrinia and Gyromitus. The family Thaumatomonadidae is now restricted to Thaumatomonas, Allas, Reckertia, and Thaumatomastix (Howe et al. 2010). The non-flagellate Rhizaspis, previously sometimes classified with thaumatomonads (Patterson and Zollfel,1991; Patterson et al., 2000), is now excluded and grouped with the filose amoeba Rhogostoma in the order Cryomonadida, which is not closely related to thaumatomonads (Howe et al., 2010).
Molecular phylogenies are available for four thaumatomonad genera (Thaumatomonas, Allas, Reckertia, Peregrinia) (Cavalier-Smith and Chao, 2003; Wylezich et al., 2007; Howe et al. 2010, who showed that many strains or sequences had previously been misidentified). Most authors showed that thaumatomonads and several other groups of cercozoan flagellates: cercomonads (Karpov et al., 2006), glissomonads (Howe et al., 2009), pansomonads (Bass et al., 2009), cryomonads (Hoppenrath and Leander, 2006; Chantangsi et al., 2008) are rather independent from each other on molecular trees. On the most comprehensive 18S rRNA gene sequence analysis, Thaumatomonadida is a monophyletic branch that is sister to Spongomonadida (Howe et al., 2010); they classified both orders in the class Imbricatea together with Euglyphida and Marimonadida that weakly grouped with them. No support was found for a previous suggestion based on small subunit (ssu) rRNA and combined data for both ssu rRNA and partial large subunit rRNA gene sequences, but quite few taxa, that thaumatomonads may be sister to Bodomorpha (Wylezich et al., 2007), which now belongs to the Glissomonadida (Howe et al., 2009). In many molecular phylogenetic trees thaumatomonads branch with euglyphid amoebae (Wylezich et al., 2007; Chantangsi et al., 2008; Cavalier-Smith et al., 2008, 2009). As bootstrap support for the phylogenetic position of Thaumatomonadida as sister to Spongomonadida is low (Howe et al., 2010) their position is not yet fully solved using molecular phylogeny only.
Morphological data like flagellar apparatus structure are very important to clarify flagellate relationships and taxonomy, as was shown for many different groups of eukaryotes. The ultrathin structure of T. lauterborni and T. seravini was investigated earlier (Karpov, 1987, 1993; Karpov and Zhukov, 1987) as was that of T. vancouveri
(Howe et al., 2010), but the flagellar apparatus was not given enough attention to reconstruct the detailed three dimensional geometry of the roots. Here a reconstruction of the Thaumatomonas cytoskeleton based on serial ultrathin sections of T. seravini and T. lauterborni is presented. The main characters of the flagellar apparatus are given for the genus Thaumatomonas, and the phylogeny of thaumatomonads is discussed combining morphological and molecular data.
Material and methods
The cultures of T. seravini (strain T-2) and T. lauterborni (strain T-1) were prepared for electron microscopy as described earlier (Karpov, 1987, 1993). For 3D reconstruction of the flagellar apparatus serial sections of15 non-dividing cells for T. seravini and 7 for T. lauterborni were studied.
Results and discussion
COMMON FEATURES OF BOTH STRAINS OF
Thaumatomonas
The anterior end of Thaumatomonas has quite a peculiar structure (Figs 1, 13). The deep flagellar pocket is open on its ventral and anterior side. Its funnel is oriented at approximately 40-50 degrees to the transverse plane of the cell, and continues into the ventral groove. The kinetosomes ofboth flagella lie nearly parallel to each other, but their long axes are mutually slightly twisted so that they lie not in one plane but in two parallel planes, one slightly rotated relative to the other and also point ventrally and forward. Two reservoirs of contractile vacuoles are applied to the left and right sides of the flagellar pocket, slightly ventrally.
The anterior nuclear surface is flat with a small invagination, and is located close to the bottom of the flagellar pocket near the kinetosomes. The kinetosome of the posterior flagellum (PK) is the nearest to the nucleus, while the kinetosome of the anterior flagellum (AK) is more anterior and shifted slightly to the right and ventrally, thus the proximal end of PK is a bit more dorsal. Both kinetosomes have bevelled proximal ends (Figs 11, 12, 15, 20) and connect to each other with fibrillar bridges (Figs 4,
5, 14, 17). There are two most conspicuous bridges: a proximal, which associates with a common fibrillar sheet around the AK and PK, and a distal one (Figs 4, 5). The AK has two prominent feet of electron
Figs 1-6. Ultrastructure of Thaumatomonas seravini. 1 — general view of the cell shows the arrangement of organelles, 2 — LS of posterior flagellum, 3 — TS of posterior flagellum at the distal part of flagellar pocket near its transition into the ventral groove (view from inside the cell), 4-5 — two consecutive sections showing the fibrillar derivates of flagellar apparatus (bars mark the root striation), 6 — TS of the proximal end of PK. Scales: 1 — 2 ^m, 2-3 — 500 nm, 4-6 — 600 nm. Abbreviations ^for figs 1-22: af — anterior flagellum, ag — Golgi apparatus, ak — anterior kinetosome, cv — contractile vacuole, da — dorsal anterior root, fb — fibrillar bridges connecting kinetosomes, ff — fibrillar feet of PK; fr — fibrillar root, kc — kinetocysts, lr — left anterior root, m — mitochondrion, mi — microbody, n — nucleus, pf — posterior flagellum, pk — posterior kinetosome; smt — secondary microtubules, vg — ventral groove, vp1 — ventral posterior root of posterior flagellum, vp2 — ventral posterior root of anterior flagellum.
ak
da+lr
Pf
vp2
smt
vp1
*
,r \ r t t;r V da+lr Pf
8 vp2 VF>1
Ir.
fb"
da
»v ak
3
vp2
vp2 \ ■ smt lr
\ Pf
vp2
10
fb smt «
9m vp2 m> \ pk T
11
vp2^J n 12 pk\ ^ mp vp1
Figs 7-12. Series ofselected sections of Thaumatomonas seravini flagellar apparatus (from dorsal to ventral). Ventral roots at the proximal ventral side of flagellar pocket. Scale: 400 nm.
dense material at the middle of its left surface. Flagellar roots of T. seravini
Both feet produce several microtubules in different The microtubular roots of the kinetosomes in
directions (Figs 5, 14). both species are very similar to those ofcercomonads
(Karpov et al., 2006; Cavalier-Smith and Karpov, submitted); therefore the names of the roots are the same.
The AK gives rise to two microtubular roots. Root vp2 originates from the proximal end of the kinetosome and passes around the proximal end of PK in a ventral direction (Figs 6, 8-12). It consists at the base of 3 microtubules, associated with a thin fibrillar plate facing the kinetosomes (Fig. 6). The root passes ventrally along the nuclear surface, and then turns forward underlying the membrane of the flagellar pocket on its posterior ventral side. The number of microtubules increases to 5 or more, and the root transits from the pocket to the right wall of the ventral groove (Figs 3, 7-12). As in cercomonads this root accompanies root vp1 coming from the PK.
The dorsal anterior root (da) of two microtubules starts from the anterior surface of AK and passes forward underlying the plasma membrane of the flagellar pocket anterior and slightly to the left (Figs 2, 7-9). At its base it is associated with electron dense material, producing many secondary microtubules in the nuclear direction (Fig. 10).
The PK has only a vp1 microtubular root of three plus one microtubules, which appears from the posterior side ofPK, and passes in the same direction as vp2 turning slightly to the left at the transition of the flagellar pocket into the ventral groove (Figs 3,
6, 8-12). At this level additional microtubules appear amounting in total to up to 7 microtubules in vp1 more distally (Figs 7, 8). This root supports the left wall of the ventral groove.
one more root of one microtubule associated with fibrillar material appears from the space between kinetosomes in connection with inter-kinetosomal fibrillar bridges. It corresponds with the left root (lr) of cercomonads in its origin and association with fibrillar material. At the middle of AK, lr turns left and forward, and accompanies the da root forming together with da the 2+1 band of microtubules, which goes along the wall of the flagellar pocket to its anterior ventral ridge (Figs
7-10). At the distal end this band produces many secondary microtubules from both sides to the left and right sides of the cell supporting the ridges ofthe flagellar pocket (Figs 3, 7-9). Some of them seem to fuse with the ventral roots and follow along the ventral furrow supporting its left and right walls.
The PK has a developed fibrillar sheet at its proximal end, which gives rise to a broad nuclear root 1.1-1.2 ^m long, composed of thin filaments (Figs 4-6). This root passes dorsally and left along the nuclear surface, and has a weak cross striation with a period of appr. 50 nm (Fig. 5). It attaches by
its distal end to the nuclear surface, having a special prominence at this place (Fig. 4).
Flagellar roots of T. lauterborni
General cell organization of T. lauterborni is very similar to that of T. seravini differing by the absence of symbiotic bacteria (Figs 1, 13) (Karpov, 1993). Flagellar root organization of T. lauterborni is generally the same (Figs 14-21). The PK has a fibrillar root, connecting the PK to the nuclear surface as in T. seravini (Figs 14, 20). Roots vp2 and vp1 have the same structure and position (Figs 15-21), and da consists of two microtubules. All the fibrillar bridges and even two lateral feet on the left surface of AK are present in T. lauterborni (Figs 14, 16, 17). Some minor differences concern the fibrillar root, which is less developed in T. lauterborni, and presence of an additional microtubule in the dorsal band (lr+da): four in T. lauterborni instead of three in T. seravini. The origin of this additional microtubule is not clear.
Because of such similarity the general scheme of the flagellar apparatus is presented for both species of Thaumatomonas (Fig. 22).
This scheme of the flagellar roots is congruent with previous studies of T. lauterborni (Karpov and Zhukov, 1987; Karpov, 1987, 1993), where the dorsal band and two ventral microtubular roots were shown. The main goal of the current paper was to clarify the root origins, which had been a problem as both kinetosomes are embedded in a dense fibrillar matrix masking the microtubules. The dorsal band composed of two roots (lr and da) initiates many secondary microtubules at its distal end. It is not clear which root produces those as both lr and da are associated with thin fibrillar material.
The electron micrographs of T. vancouveri (Howe et al., 2010) give not enough information for discussion of the root structure of this species. The internal cell structure of other species of Thaumatomonas was not investigated.
ThaumatomonaS relationships
According to the latest molecular phylogeny, the nearest relatives of thaumatomonads are probably the spongomonads (Spongomonas) (Howe et al., 2010); all other recent phylogenies show that cercomonads are more distant (Cavalier-Smith et al. 2008, 2009; Chantangsi et al., 2008). Spongomonadida are non-gliding biflagellates which have two parallel kinetosomes interconnected by fibrillar bridges (Hibberd, 1976, 1983), what is similar to thaumatomonad flagellar apparatus. In
Figs 13-17. Ultrastructure of Thaumatomonas lauterborni. 13 — general view of the cell shows the arrangement of organelles, 14 — fibrillar derivates of kinetosomes, 15 — LS of posterior flagellum, 16, 17 — two consecutive sections showing the roots at the base of ak. Scales: 13 — 1.5 ^m, 14-17 — 400 nm.
other respects their cytoskeleton is rather different. The main character of Spongomonadida is fibrillar cup surrounding the base of each kinetosome. All the lateral microtubules associated with striated fibrillar roots (up to three in Spongomonas), and the rhizoplast begin from these cups (Hibberd, 1976, 1983; Karpov, unpublished). Cytoskeleton reconstruction was published for the better investigated Rhipidodendron only (Hibberd, 1976). The flagellar apparatus of Spongomonas is similar to
that of Rhipidodendron, but was not investigated in details, and may have some peculiarities (Karpov, unpublished). Both Rhipidodendron and Spongo-monas seem do not have roots corresponding vp1 and vp2. Their microtubular funs radiate from the distal part of fibrillar cup of each kinetosome, and are always associated with lateral striated fibrillar roots. The origin of the band of two-three microtubules supporting the rim of flagellar pouch is not clear, therefore we cannot be sure
18
af
19
Figs 18-21. Series of selected sections of Thau-matomonas lauterborni flagellar apparatus. Scale: 400 nm.
whether this band corresponds to lr, or to da of Thaumatomonas. Spongomonads also differ from thaumatomonads by the absence of scales, gliding movement, pseudopodial production
and phagocytosis. Spongomonads have unusual asymmetric cytoplasmic projection around the flagella. Each flagellum has the extremely long (up to 1 ^m) transition zone containing no or just one central microtubule (Hibberd, 1976, 1983). Thus, morphological comparison of thaumatomonads and spongomonads does not support the recent molecular phylogenetic trees (Howe et al., 2010). Ultrastructure of most flagellates branching somewhere near Spongomonas (e.g. Pseudopirsonia, Peregrinia) is poorly known.
Comparison with the better investigated cerco-monad cytoskeleton shows that Thaumatomonas has minimal set of cercomonad microtubular roots, which one can see in Cercomonas and Eocercomonas (Karpov et al., 2006) and Paracercomonas (Cavalier-Smith and Karpov, unpublished). The Thaumato-monas peculiarities concern the kinetosome disposition, presence of the fibrillar striated root (rhi-zoplast) at PK, and vp2 association with dense plate. The kinetosomes in cercomonads are never parallel to each other, and the PK always attaches to the middle of AK by its proximal end. The AK of Thaumatomonas offsets more ventral and to the right of PK, and both kinetosomes lie in different planes.
Besides cercomonads this set of microtubular roots is present in ‘Heteromita sp.’ (Karpov, 1997), which Cavalier-Smith and Oates (submitted) suggest may be related to Bodomorpha, the glisso-monad Allapsa (Cavalier-Smith and Oates, submitted), Katabia (Karpov et al., 2003) with extra complications, and in a more reduced form in Sainouron and Helkesimastix (Cavalier-Smith et al., 2008, 2009). Accordingly to a partial sequence of SSU rDNA Katabia is the closest relative to ‘Heteromita’ (Karpov et al., 2003), which seems to be a glissomonad now (Howe et al., 2009). The Katabia cytoskeleton is quite complex, but has these 4 microtubular roots: lr, vp1 (gr in Katabia), vp2 (pb), and da (cr). As in Thaumatomonas pb (vp2) is characteristically associated with a dense plate that skirts the proximal end of PK and then accompanies root gr (vp1), but cr (da) is more complex, being composed of 2 microtubules connected to a rather thick fibrillar strand. Root da in Thaumatomonas also has a fibrillar part, but it is very thin, and inconspicuous. Bodomorpha also has lr, vp2 (ms) associated with a dense plate, and following vp1 (vr), and da (dr) (Karpov, 1997).
Fibrillar roots are not as conservative as microtubular ones, but both Katabia and Bodomorpha also have a fibrillar striated root (rhizoplast) connecting PK to the nuclear surface. Moreover, in Bodomorpha it terminates at special granule at the nuclear surface (Karpov, 1997) as in Thaumatomonas.
Further comparison ofthese three genera reveals more morphological similarities: a flagellar transition zone with a diaphragm, transverse plate located above the cell surface, and a transition cylinder. There are also kinetocysts and microbodies. Kineto-somes of Thaumatomonas unlike in cercomonads lie nearly parallel to each other, as in spongomonads, but show less similarity to kinetosome disposition in Katabia and Bodomorpha, having orthogonal kinetosomes also lying in different planes (Karpov, 1997; Karpov et al., 2003). Bodomorpha has bevelled kinetosomes as Thaumatomonas.
Thus, morphological analysis supports a relationship of Thaumatomonas to bodomorphid glissomonad Bodomorpha and its possible relative Katabia.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks the RFBR for the grant
08-04-00244, and Thomas Cavalier-Smith for the manuscript revision, constructive comments and language correction.
References
Adl S.M., Simpson A.G.B., Farmer M.A., Andersen R.A., Anderson R.A., Barta J., Bowser S., Brugerolle G., Fensome R., Fredericq S., JamesT.Y., Karpov S.A., Kugrens P., Krug J., Lane C., Lewis L.A., Lodge J., Lynn D.H., Mann D., McCourt R.M., Mendoza L., Moestrup 0., Mozley-Standridge S.E., Nerad T.A., Shearer C., Smirnov A.V., Spiegel F. and Taylor F.J.R. 2005. The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 52, 5, 399—432.
Bass D., Howe A.T., Mylnikov A.P., Vicker-man K., Chao E.E., Smallbone J.E., Snell J., Cabral Jr.C. and Cavalier-Smith T. 2009. Phylo-geny and classification of Cercomonadidae: Cercomonas, Eocercomonas, Paracercomonas, and Cavernomonas gen. n. Protist. 160, 483-521.
Cavalier-Smith T. and Chao E. E. 2003. Phy-logeny and classification of phylum Cercozoa (Protozoa). Protist. 154, 341-358.
Cavalier-Smith T., Lewis R., Chao E. E., Oates B. and Bass D. 2008. Morphology and phylogeny of Sainouron acronematica sp. n. and the ultrastructural unity of Cercozoa. Protist, 159, 591-620.
Cavalier-Smith T., Lewis R., Chao E. E., Oates B. and Bass D. 2009. Helkesimastix marina n. sp. (Cercozoa: Sainouroidea superfam. n.) a gliding
Fig. 22. Stylized scheme of kinetid structure of Thaumatomonas. The proximal ends ofkinetosomes shown only; vp2 represented by three microtubules, associated with dense plate (black); vp1 shown at its origin (3+1 microtubules). Viewed from dorsal posterior side of the cell.
zooflagellate lineage of novel ultrastructure and unique ciliary pattern. Protist. 160, 452-479.
Chantangsi C., Esson H.J. and Leander B.S. 2008. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of a marine interstitial tetraflagellate with putative endosymbionts: Auranticordis quadriverberis n. gen. et sp. (Cercozoa). BMC Microbiol. 8, 123.
Hoppenrath M. and Leander B. S. 2006. Dinoflagellate, euglenid or cercomonad? The ultrastructure and molecular phylogenetic position of Protaspis grandis n. sp. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 53, 327-342.
Howe A.T., Bass D., Vickerman K., Chao E.E. and Cavalier-Smith T. 2009. Phylogeny, taxonomy, and astounding genetic diversity of Glissomonadida ord. nov., the dominant gliding zooflagellates in soil (Protozoa: Cercozoa). Protist. 160, 159-189.
Howe A.T., Bass D., Scoble J., Lewis R., Vickerman K., Arndt H. and Cavalier-Smith T. 2010. Novel cultured protists identify deep-branching environmental DNA clades of Cercozoa: new genera Micrometopion, Minimassisteria, Nudi-fila, Peregrinia. Protist. In press.
Karpov S.A. 1987. Flagellar apparatus structure of Thaumatomonas lauterborni and the estimation of the concept of cell structures evolutionary
conservatism. Tsitologiya. 29, 12, 1349-1354 (in Russian).
Karpov S.A. 1990. Analysis of the orders Phalansteriida, Spongomonadida and Thaumato-monadida. Zool. Zhurn. 69, 3, 5-12 (in Russian).
Karpov S.A. 1993. The ultrathin structure of colourless flagellate Thaumatomonas seravini. Tsitologiya. 35, 9, 8-11 (in Russian).
Karpov S.A. 1997. Cercomonads and their relationship to the Myxomycetes. Arch. Protistenk. 148,297-307.
Karpov S.A. 2000. Flagellate phylogeny: ultra-structural approach. In: The Flagellates. (Leadbea-ter B.S.C. and Green J.C. eds). Systematics Association Special Publications. Taylor and Francis, London. pp. 336-360.
Karpov S.A. and Zhukov B.F. 1987. Cytological peculiarities of colourless flagellate Thaumatomonas lauterborni. Tsitologiya. 29, 10, 1168-1171 (in Russian).
Karpov S.A., Bass D., Mylnikov A.P. and Cavalier-Smith T. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of Cercomonadidae and kinetid patterns of Cercomo-nas and Eocercomonas gen. nov. (Cercomonadida, Cercozoa). Protist. 157,125-158.
Karpov S.A., Ekelund F. and Moestrup 0. 2003. Katabia gromovi nov. gen. nov sp. — a new soil flagellate with affinities to Heteromita (Cercomonadida). Protistology. 3, 1, 30-41.
Patterson D. J. and Zolffel M. 1991. Hetero-trophic flagellates of uncertain taxonomic position.
In: The Biology of Free-Living Heterotrophic Flagellates. (Patterson D.J. and Larson J. eds). Clarendon Press, Oxford. pp. 427-476.
Patterson D.J., V0rs N., Simpson A.G.B. and O’Kelly C. 2000. Residual free-living and predatory heterotrophic flagellates. In: An Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa. (Lee J. J., Leedale G. F. and Bradbury P. eds). Society of Protozoologists, Lawrence. pp. 1302-1328.
Shirkina N.I. 1987. The morphology and life cycle of Thaumatomonas lauterborni De Saedeleer (Mastigophora Diesing). In: Fauna and Biology of Freshwater Organisms. (Monakov A.V. ed.). Nau-ka, Leningrad (St. Petersburg). pp. 87-107.
Swale E.M.F. and Belcher J.H. 1974. Gyromitus disomatus Skuja — a free-living colourless flagellate. Arch. Protistenkd. 116, 211—220.
Swale E.M.F. and Belcher J.H. 1975. Gyromitus limax nov. sp. — free-living colourless amoebo-flagellate. Arch. Protistenkd. 117, 20—26.
Vickerman K., Brugerolle G. and Mignot J.-P. 1991. Mastigophora. In: Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates. (Harrison F.W. and Corliss J. O. eds). Wiley-Liss, New York. pp. 13—153.
Wylezich C., Mylnikov A., Weitere M. and Arndt H. 2007. Distribution and phylogenetic relationships of freshwater thaumatomonads with a description of the new species Thaumatomonas coloniensis n. sp. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 54, 4, 347-357.
Address for correspondence: Sergey A. Karpov. Zoological Institute RAS, Universitetskaya emb. 1, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia; e-mail: [email protected]
