CC BY
9"FAMILY ISSUE" IN THE RECEPTION RUSSIAN-ANGLO-AMERICAN SLAVIC STUDIES
Lomova E. A.
Kazakh National Pedagogical University Abai
Abstract. Family is one of the nuclear concepts of human culture and mentality of any nation. The word "family" belongs to the main category of words giving an idea of a single ethnic culture and an intercultural space as a whole.
The concept of "family" associatively related concepts ("home", "father", "mother", "parents") and accumulated the most important idea of the material and spiritual culture, which are transmitted from generation to generation.
American society, in the period of the Civil War, Reconstruction and the Great Depression and Russia at the time after abolition of serfdom was similar to interest in the institute of the family as the traditional values to be protected.
The gap was not human at all, namely kinship perceived in the American South was extremely painful. The value unit of the South is known not to be the individual itself and the family, or "southern community".
As in the XIX century and in the twentieth century the family in its traditional understanding proclaimed the enduring value of the Southern Society, "legacy" of the past, which would survive in difficult times for the southerners by its inherent quality stability and rootedness in the past.
Keywords: transformation, society structure, idea of Southness, notion of "Southern Home", culturephenomen, literature tradition, "AccidentalFamily", intercultural communication.
One of the fundamental problems of the world of culture and literature in particular, is the problem of the family and its well-being, happiness and unhappiness, and further development in the future.
Family is one of the nuclear concepts of human culture and mentality of any nation. The word "family" belongs to the main category of words giving an idea of a single ethnic culture and an intercultural space as a whole. [1]
The concept of "family" associatively related concepts ("home", "father", "mother", "parents") and accumulated the most important idea of the material and spiritual culture, which are transmitted from generation to generation. [2]
The modern family is in crisis, takes a place a process of transformation of the negative role of the family in society, first and foremost, the reorientation of traditional values and priorities. [17]
The critical state of the institution of the family is reflected in the instability of marriages, increase in the number and divorces, the gap between generations and neglect of children.
This situation has caused the emergence of numerous studies on families in different areas of knowledge. Current studies are designed to not only understand the theory, change the family, but also are updated the value of the traditional family and its spiritual foundations. [3]
There are a lot of works of Russian and foreign writers dedicated to the study of family problem. [4], [6], [10], [15]
In American literature I half of XIX century "cult of the hearth," and the problem priority families were particularly relevant. [4]
The role of women and their social importance in the structure of American society was revealed in the work of S. Hale, and the idea of "a home" was becoming central to the creativity of the K. Beecher also. [5]
Development of ideas of southern civilization and social status of woman took a central place in the essays of Louise McCord.
Specificity and flavor of the American hearth and the image of housewife was reflected in prose Caroline Gilman. [6]
Historical value of the southern community was at the heart of the novels of Carolyn Henze, and the status and woman importance in the fate of the South was actively discussed in the works of Mary Mclntosh.
The ways of gaining "The southern house" were reflected in the novels of Marion Garland, and the ideology preached by Confederation of the South took place in the creativity of Augusta Evans. [7]
The reader of these books was pleased to special traits and enjoyed unique spirit of the South house, because American writers "lovingly and meticulously recreated the cultural and spiritual sphere shaped of the southern plantation". [8]
First of all the concept of a "big southern family" included a central" figure. "Southern gentleman," the owner, husband and father, as well as its code of honor, "Southern woman" should be beautiful, a real lady and matron.
Common southern idyll of happy family hearth added a dedicated black image of the nurse as a symbol of the southern virtues, which was fully in line with Christian ethics. [9]
The concept of "America hearth" in the literature of the United States received an exceptional theoretical basis during the struggle for independence and establishment the young American state.
This created American house reflected the fundamental elements and features of the nation as a whole. Thus a new nation and moral concept was based on the principles of Christian virtues and civil liberties.
This social concept also was formed as a part of the whole ideology of the nation as a Christian home, which determined traits of American excellence and America's role as a special messiah in the development of human civilization. [10]
The novel "hearth" was an effective way to express the philosophy and ideology of the Old South and the accurate picture of the formation of such a capacious national-cultural phenomenon as the "Southern World" as he synthesized and embodied in the word partisanship to slavery. [11]
The cultural phenomenon of "south of the world" was the image of the Old South as well organized patriarchal society in which each member (a black-and-white, rich-poor, male-female) took a special place and everyone could find happiness and harmony of being. [16]
"Southern World" could be explained only in terms of the slave ideology and racism. Vitality "south of the world" was provided its specificity as a cultural and historical phenomenon. [12]
Old South itself was formed not only in defending its ideology, but also in the process constructed its world and its culture.
Thus South community strove to perpetuate not only the status of the property in social relationship, but also dignity, Christian love neighbor and ideals of harmonious society.
The novel "hearth" claimed the idea of "republicanism", the contents of which included the new, active role of women in the construction of the new republic. Women were granted special social authority within the allotted space in the house place - in the home and in the family, where they were dependent on the state of the younger generation of citizens of the American Republic. [13]
In the European social and philosophical thought until the XIX century, the family was associated with the concept of a patriarchal society Russian common literary tradition treated the patriarchal family, the house as an ethical space in which there was love. The traditional role of the father in the patriarchal family involved the submission of an effort to "freely and lovingly to fulfill his will". [14]
The abolition of serfdom came to light a terrible state of Russian society, associated with the fall of moral and traditional values.
In this contradictive and trouble historical period the leading Russian writer Leo Tolstoy, M. Saltykov-Shchedrin, F. Dostoevsky and N. Leskov turned to family, giving the reasons for its transformation into oblivion its moral spirituality.
For L. Tolstoy the family was the most important school of life, love and cultural tradition. [10] S. Aksakov called family life and an essential condition for the foundation of a truly social and human life.
F. Dostoevsky family care transformation processes associated with the historical period of reforms in Russia. The writer defined and explored the modern family as "accidental family" and family issues final artistic expression in his last novel "The Brothers Karamazov". [22]
Modern researchers admit the relevance of the research topic "accidental family" in the works of Dostoevsky in connection with the ongoing processes in the modern society. [16]
Creativity of F. Dostoevsky took a special place not only in Russian but also in foreign literature and modern researchers have continued discussion about the issues of Russian novelist reception creativity from point of view different culture system. [17]
The history of interaction with the work of American literature F. Dostoevsky was observed periods of the intense interest to the Russian novelist and of the relative "calm" periods.
In 1912, K. Garnett published the first translation of "The Brothers Karamazov" into English, and the further period was considered the so-called "cult of F. Dostoevsky", and provided helping to maintain the strong reputation of the Russian writer as" a subtle psychologist and expert in the "unpredictable Russian soul" and at the same time" mediocre artist" (X. Muchnik, D. Phelps).
The next twenty years have brought a slight decline of interest in F. Dostoevsky in America, and the next twenty, on the contrary, marked by an explosion of interest in a heritage F. Dostoevsky, which led to the realization of the value of artistic discoveries F. Dostoevsky and approved its reputation as the creator of the modern novel. [18]
B. Holstein in his article «Accidental Families and Surrogate Fathers: Richard, Grigory and Smerdyakov» noted that in the novel F. Dostoevsky "The Brothers Karamazov" had given the most comprehensive analysis of the relationship of fathers and sons. The development in the novel was represented as the movement of the fathers to the false true, from selfishness to sacrifice, from neglect and violence of love and responsibility. [19]
J. Knapp said that the novel "The Brothers Karamazov" had been considered as the most intimately connected with the personal family drama F. Dostoyevsky.
S. Fossa believed that Dostoevsky turned to the latest novels to the problem of "accidental family" because the family considered as such immutable value of the potential recovery of the spiritual basis of human. [36]
American society, in the period of the Civil War, Reconstruction and the Great Depression and Russia at the time after abolition of serfdom was similar to interest in the institute of the family as the traditional values to be protected.
The gap was not human at all, namely kinship perceived in the American South was extremely painful. The value unit of the South is known not to be the individual itself and the family, or "southern community" (M. Lerner, A. Bleykasten).
As in the XIX century and in the twentieth century the family in its traditional understanding proclaimed the enduring value of the Southern Society, "legacy" of the past, which would survive in difficult times for the southerners by its inherent quality stability and rootedness in the past.
REFERENCES
1. Banach-Manikina A. "Accidental family" in the works of F.Dostoevsky and its reception in the United States. - Diss. cand. filol. - Tomsk, 2006. - 253 p.
2. Fusso S. Dostoevsky and the Family // Cambridge Companion to Dostoevsky / Ed. by Leatherbarrow WJ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. - 175- 190 p.
3. Golstein V. Accidental Families and Surrogate Fathers: Richard, Grigory, and Smerdyakov // A New Word on the Brothers Karamazov / Ed. by Jackson R. L.- Evanston; Illinois: Northwestern University press, 2004. - 90-106 p.
4. Harris SM A New Era in Female History: Nineteenth-Century US Women Writers // "American Literature", V. 74, № 3, September, 2002.1. - 604-612 p.
5. Knapp L. Mothers and Sons in The Brothers Karamazov: Our Ladies of Skotoprigonevsk // A New Word on the Brothers Karamazov / Ed. by Jackson R. L. Evanston; Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2004. - 34 p.
6. Ljvova I. Literary reputation F.Dostoevsky in the United States (1940- 1960-ies.). - Diss. cand. filol. - Petrozavodsk: Karelian State Pedagogical University, 2000. - 203 p.
7. M. Martin family problems in the work of L. Tolstoy (1850-1870-ies.). - Diss. cand. filol. -M., 2000. - 209 p.
8. Medinskiy NB Dostoevsky in the American criticism of 1980-1990-ies. - Diss. cand. filol. Sciences. - Tomsk, 1997. - 203 p.
9. Morozov IV The discourse of the Old South in the "novel of the hearth": the creative legacy of the US writers of the first half of the XIX century. - Diss. cand. filol. Sciences. - SPb., 2006. - 203 p.
10. VV Pereyashkin F.Dostoevsky and "southern school" in American literature: on the material of W. Faulkner and William Styron // continuity in the development of literature. Pyatigorsk, 1993. - 98-108 p.
11. Prince D. Fatherhood. St. Petersburg., 2003. - 47 p.
12. Proskurin E. The ideological and artistic features of the Incarnation, "thought the family" in the novels of LN Tolstoy's "Anna Karenina" and ME Saltykov-Shchedrin "Golovlevs." - Diss. cand. filol. - Eagle, 2001.-203 with.
13. Reuters K. Modern Russian family as the translator of cultural values. - Diss. cand. Phil. Volgograd, 2005. - 150 p.
14. Shahovtseva E. Creation of contemporary writers of the American South in the light of the concept of "cultural feminism" (English. German). - Vladivostok: Publishing house Dalnevost, University Press, 2001. - 136 p.
15. Shaulov S. "Random Family" as a system of mutual reflections (based on the novel "The Brothers Karamazov") // Dostoevsky and World Culture: Almanac. - Saint Petersburg Silver Age, 2003.- № 18. - 104-113 p.
16. Thompson D. "The Brothers Karamazov" and the poetics of memory / Trans. from English. - Saint Petersburg Academic Project, 2000. - 203 p.\
17. Volzhina O. The family as a social and cultural merit, Diss. cand. - M., 2002.- 207 p.
18. V. Yatsenko The writers of the South, the United States and criticized Russian translations (1847- 1977) // Literary communication and mutual problem: - Gorky: 1982. - 62-71 p.
19. Yevdokimov E. The family as ethical and philosophical reality: On a material of Russian literature of the XIX century. - Diss. cand. filol. - Saint Petersburg, 2002. - 204 p.
РЕСМИ 1СКЕРЛ1К ЦАРЫМ-ЦАТЫНАС ЖЭНЕ СвЙЛЕУ
МЭДЕНИЕТ1
к.ф.н., доцент ТурабаеваЛ. К. к.ф.н. Абдикеримова Г. А. магистр Турсунбаева Ц. Т.
Цазацстан, Шымкент цаласы, М.Эуезов атындагы OH^YcmiK Цазащстан мемлекеттшуниверситетi
Abstract. This article is aimed at consideration of issues concerning the speech culture in everyday life. The issues of violating the main principles of business relations ethicality during public speaking and deviation from the language norms have been considered. Besides, the conclusions as to formal speech peculiarities have been made. The article covers the public speaking stages, methods of due speech formation, preparation for meeting the listeners and techniques to control the audience. The explanations related to the courtly use of speech tokens according to the ethic standards and the ways to improve the ones, which express the respectful attitude towards listeners, have been given.
The article addresses the activity of the linguistic centers required for forming the speech culture. The issues of the center activity aimed at linguistic prognostication of a traditional language system, the tasks of complex research of qualitative and digital speech directions, development of public speaking traditions have been considered, the issues related to the speech culture, linguistic ecology of speech and ecology of the speech culture have been covered as well. The article reveals the language situations concerning ecology of the speech culture, linguistic consciousness, language environment, and purity of language environment, violation of stylistics in the speech activity, and also the issues of the speech ethics, speech culture, monitoring, and other issues.
Keywords: speech culture, language norm, public speaking, public officers, business relations, communication, language structure.
Тш - жанды ^былыс. Тш мэдениет дегенiмiз - 6ip Караганда, тшдш норманы сакгап сейлеу, д^рыс жазу деген TYcrniK. Алайда б^л ^гым^сшшке дэл ез магынасында терещрек ой жiберcек, сездш ^оры дамыган оралымды, бай тшдщ ^лт мэртебесш ас^акгатып, хал^ына ^ызмет ету Yшiн ^арапайым сейлеу тшшен бастап, сан тYрлi бояуга ^анывдан тшге айналуы сатысында соншальщты ^иын ^алыптасу кезещ жатыр.
