CC BY
13
Electrical Behavior of Cd03Zn11x S07 Thin Films for Non-Heat Light Emitting Diodes
Cliff Orori Mosiori 1, John Maera 2, Reuben Shikambe 3, Robert Magare 3
1 Technical University of Mombasa
P. O. Box 90420-80100, Mombasa, Kenya
2 Maasai Mara University
P. O. Box 861-20500, Narok, Kenya
o
3 Kenyatta University
P. O. Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
DOI: 10.22178/pos.23-5
LCC Subject Category: TP155-156
Received 18.05.2017 Accepted 15.06.2017 Published online 19.06.2017
Corresponding Author:
Mosiori Cliff Orori, [email protected]
© 2017 The Authors. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License l^O—
Abstract. In developing countries like Kenya, solution processing technique is the cheapest and simplest technique to grow inorganic composites thin films. This method was used to grow thin films of Cd03Zn11xS0j on ordinary microscope Perspex substrate slides from aqueous solutions of Zinc chloride and cadmium chloride in ammonia solution. A solution of triethanalomine was used as a complexing agent while thiourea was used as source of sulphide ions. Electrical properties as a function of their thicknesses were obtained by varying deposition time while all other parameters were maintained constant. Using a resistance measurement device and a Gauss meter, resistivity and the conductivity of the films were found to be thickness dependent with semiconductor nature.
Keywords: complexing agent; zinc; cadmium; thiourea; resistivity; sulphur.
Introduction
A composite of inorganic thin films containing cadmium and zinc has been largely neglected en route to technological development though thin films containing sulphur has a significant solid state material of both scientific applications. It is ternary stable non-stoichiometric compound in which zinc and cadmium sulfides belongs to group II—VI compound semiconductor materials [4]. Depending on preparation conditions, they can occur in cubic or hexagonal or both crystal structures [14] with a large band gap of above 2.413 eV. This size of band gap has vast potential use in thin film devices especially in photoluminescent and electroluminescent devices. In most studies, only binary thin films of CdS and ZnS have been largely prepared using many deposition techniques such as Sol gel techniques [3], Metal Organic Vapor Deposition [15], Magnetron Sputtering Technique [18], Spray Pyrolysis
Technique [2], and Electrostatic Assisted Aerosol Jet Deposition [15]. Among most techniques, solution processing or what is commonly known as chemical both deposition methods has offered a better option. It is a technique that allows thin films to be grown on all kinds of hydrophilic substrates; very simple, inexpensive, suitable for large area deposition and impurities present in the initial chemicals can be removed by simply using of a suitable complexing agent [8]. This article chose to investigate electrical properties of Cdo.3ZnxSo.7 ternary thin films grown chemical bath as a function their as deposited thicknesses.
Theory
Electrical Resistivity of thin films. When only two basic configurations of the film resistance are considered, their resistance R can be expressed be given as [9]:
R,
dw
and the number of squares chosen N [3], hence (1) the total resistance is given as:
where R - is the resistance; p - is the resistivity; L - is the length of the rectangular substrate; dw - is the element of the width.
If L = W, then:
R = R x N.
(4)
The resistance of such material is determined by the equation are given by the relation:
R=p=R ■
d
(2)
R = R.
LW 1
+ ■
V nm
nm
2(0.46)
L_
nm J
(5)
is the resistance of the film layer and is expressed in ohms-square:
p = d x Rs.
(3)
Therefore, the resistance R of one square of a
film depends not on square the size but only on the resistivity and thickness though the figure's dimensions are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 - Hypothetical dimensions for analysis of electrical resistivity section of thin films used for electrical characterization
This value is widely used for film comparison, in particular films of one material grown under identical conditions. If the thickness is known, the resistivity p can be obtained [1]. Any change in thickness causes variation of resistance changes without change in the basic properties of a material. This configuration is characteristic of many inorganic thin films [2]. Though it is known that resistivity and temperature coefficient of resistance depend on the surface resistance R
RSLW hence ——— « 1,
nm
2
(6)
where n = —h 1, w = s width of lines and S is the
a
width of intervals between the lines giving the parameters of a thin film that can be used for operational development of resistance as:
R = 7xN.
(7)
Temperature coefficient of resistance TCR is described by the equations:
a
P
dp
a = R
dT
Ro
(8)
Ro(T - To)
(9)
where R - is the resistance at certain temperature; T, T0 - are the temperature at 0 K [4].
Measurement of Conductivity Type. The Hall Effect is observed when a magnetic field is applied at right angles to a rectangular sample of a material carrying an electric current. A voltage appears across the sample that is due to an electric field that is at right angles to both the current and the applied magnetic field. The Hall Effect can be eas-
s
1
ily understood by looking at the Lorentz force on the current carrying electrons. The orientation of the fields and the sample are shown in Figure 1
[5].
The drift velocity appears in the cross product term of the vector Lorentz force as shown below:
Figure 1 - Sign shown for the case of positive charge carriers
An external voltage is applied to the crystal and creates an internal electric field Ex. The electric field that causes the carriers to move through the conductive sample is called the drift field J and
flows in the x-direction in response to the drift field. The carriers move with an average velocity given by the balance between the force accelerating the charge and the viscous friction produced by the collisions producing electrical resistance.
F = q( E + v x B)
(10)
where F - is the force on the carriers of current; q - is the charge of the current carriers; E - is the electric field acting on the carriers; B - is the magnetic field inside the sample [8, 10].
The transverse (y) component of the Lorentz force causes charge densities to accumulate on the transverse surfaces of the sample. An electric field in the y-direction result which just balances the Lorentz force because there is no continuous current in the y-direction. The equilibrium potential difference between the transverse sides of the sample is called the Hall voltage. The charge may be positive ("holes") or negative ("electrons") depending on the material and the motion of the carriers is specified by the drift velocity v. The magnetic field is chosen to be in the z-direction [7]. The drift velocity is the result of the action of the electric field in the x-direction. The total current is the product of the current density and the sample's transverse area A(I = JxA; A = wt as shown
in Figure 2 gives a drift current Jx is given by:
Jx = n x q x vx,
(11)
where n is the number density or concentration of carriers.
Figure 2 - Chemical bath Setup
The carrier density n is only a small fraction of the total density of electrons in the material. Thus we can measure the carrier density.
In the y-direction assuming a no load condition the free charges will move under the influence of the magnetic field to the boundaries creating an electric field in the y-direction that is sufficient to balance the magnetic force.
Ex = vxBz.
(12)
The Hall voltage is the integral of the Hall field E = VH across the sample width w such that
VH = EHw. Hence in terms of the magnetic field and the current, we have:
V
H
nqd
BI
RhBI d
(13)
Here RH is called the Hall coefficient and the
measurements will be of V as a function of
drift current I and as a function of magnetic field B. You fix one parameter in order to intelligibly observe VH. The mobility ^ is the
magnitude of the carrier drift velocity per unit electric field and is defined by the relation:
v = uE or, u = .
E,,
(14)
This quantity can appear in the expression for the current density and its practical form.
J = oE or Jx = nqvx = nquEx
(15)
We have the relations:
1
o = nqu = —.
P
(16)
Where o is the conductivity and p is the resistivity. The total sample resistance to the drift current is:
R
PpL wd
(17)
Not only does the Hall coefficient give the concentration of carriers it gives the sign of their electric charge, by:
Rh = —.
J_ nq
(18)
The dimensions of the sample are w , the width which is to be oriented in the y -direction, d the thickness which is to be oriented in the z-direction which is perpendicular to the magnetic field and L, the length of the sample which is to be located along the x-direction [12]. The sample should be about four times longer than it is wide so that the electric current streamlines have an opportunity to become laminar or the electric potential lines to become parallel and perpendicular to the edges of the sample. The Hall voltage should be zero when the sample is not in a magnetic field and the drift current is applied. A plot of Hall voltage as a function of drift current at constant magnetic field will have a slope equal to RHB / d. Thus, the slope multiplied by d / B is the magnitude of the Hall coefficient. The Hall voltage is directly related to the magnetic field and the drift current, and it is inversely related to the thickness of the sample. The samples used for the measurement are made as thin as possible to produce the largest possible voltage for easy detection. The sample has no strength to resist bending and the probe is to be treated with great care. This applies to the probe of the Gauss meter as well.
Methodology
Reagents and Chemicals. Pure analytic grade chemicals (99.9 %) of zinc chloride (ZnCh) and cadmium chloride (CdCl2), 25 % ammonia (NH3), di-ionized water; triethanolamine (TEA), and thiourea (TU) were purchased. Ordinary microscope slides were bought and used as substrates without any further modifications.
Cleaning of substrates. The following procedure was employed; scrubbing with liquid detergent; rinsing several times with distilled water; scrubbing again with detergent; Rinsing again with distilled water; scrubbing with trichloroethylene; rinsing with distilled water; scrubbing with acetone; rinsing with distilled water; scrubbing with alcohol; rinsing with di-ionized water and finally drying using an oven [9].
1
Experimental Procedures. All solutions were prepared using de-ionized water. 1 M of ZnCh, 10 M of ammonia solution, 1 M of TEA and 1 M of TU were prepared. 10 ml of the 1 M ZnCh solution were measured into a 100 ml beaker and 6 ml of the 10 M Ammonia solution was introduced gradually into the beaker with thorough stirring until the white precipitates formed fully dissolved [8, 9]. This now followed an addition of 1 ml of the 1 M TEA and finally 15 ml of 1 M thio-urea with continuous stirring to start the slow reaction for growth of the thin films. Di-ionized water was added to make up 49 ml of solution in the bath and then, 1 ml 0.3 M CdCh was then added to top to 50 ml. The chemical bath composition was at pH of 10. Microscope perspex substrate slides were used as substrates and inserted at a small angle to the vertical and suspended vertically from synthetic foam and the beaker was covered with a glass cover and left to deposit at varying time intervals [6]. The initial period was 3 hours and then subsequent ones were taken out every after five hours labelled S1 ^ S11 had deposition time of 3, 8, 13, 18, 23,
28, 33, 38, 43, 48 and 53 hours, respectively. They were dried and characterized as deposited for electrical resistivity using the direct current (DC) two point probe method and a Gauss meter.
Results and discussion
Chemical Processes in Optimization of Cd0^nxS0.7 thin films. Optimized concentration and volumes of sulphide ion source used was achieved with the concentration of 1 M zinc and 1 M cadmium chloride at pH of 10 at room temperature. This was kept constant and only the time of deposi-
Table 1 - Variation of electrical resistivity and conductivity
The resistivity of Cdo.3ZnxSo.7 film decreases from 1.822 x 105 (fl-cm) to 0.363 x 105 (fl-cm) as the film thickness increases from 69 to 300 mm [7]. The results were plotted in figures 3-4. It can be noted from figure 3 that the conductivity of Cdo.3ZnxSo.7 thin films increases from 0.549 x 10-5 (fl-i-cm-1) to 2.841 x 10-5(fl-1-cm-1) as the film thickness increases from 69 nm to 300 nm.
tion was varied. It is generally accepted [11] that the reaction governing the formation of the Cdo.3ZnxSo.7 deposits can be represented as:
Zn(NHs)2++SC(NH2)2+ 20H- ^
Cd0.sZnxS0.7 + 4NHs +CH2N2 +2H2O. (19)
Based on this expression, when the ionic product of Zn2+ and S2- exceeds the solubility product of Cdo.3ZnxSo.7, then CdojZnxSo.7 deposits are formed. This means that the ions in Cdo.3ZnxSo.7 nuclei start to coagulate onto the microscope slide substrate [8]. This then grows slowly with time at a rate complemented by the complexing agent (TEA). The rate of deposition becomes zero when S < 1 (where S = solubility) and the film attains terminal thickness [16] and stops to grow. It was noted that the rate of deposition was high at the initial process of growth. This was attributed to the high concentrations of Zn2+ and S2- in the bath solutions [9]. As the deposition went on, a thicker film of Cdo.3ZnxSo.7 was formed. The bath precursor solution becomes deficient in ions. This possible might have resulted into a slower rate of film growth [6] and finally the rate of deposition becomes zero when S < 1 and film attains terminal thickness stopping further deposition [10]. It was noted that at this final state, any further addition of thiourea does not increase the thickness of the film hence the optimized volume of thiourea was 17 ml.
Electrical properties of Cd0.3ZnxS0.7 thin films. Using the direct current two point probe method, the variation of electrical resistivity, p (fl-cm) as a function of thickness was obtained and tabulated in Table 1.
These results are attributed to show that the decrease in resistivity or the increase in conductivity as the film thickness has a relationship with crystalline of the films. This was attributed to the increase in size of crystals that effected resistivity in semiconductor thin films [8, 9].
Sample Si S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11
Thickness (nm) 69 120 143 156 166 189 214 237 269 283 300
Resistivity 1.822 1.623 1.212 0.976 0.803 0.747 0.697 0.613 0.502 0.407 0.363
(fl-cm) x 105
Conductivity 0.549 0.616 0.825 1.025 1.245 1.339 1.434 1.631 1.992 2.457 2.841
(fl-1-cm-1) x 10-5
0.2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Thin film Thickness (nm)
Figure 3 - Graph of resistivity against thickness
Figure 4 - Graph of conductivity and resistivity
Similar curves were observed by [12, 14, 16, 17] who used different deposition methods. Therefore the variation of Cdo.3ZnxSo.7 thin film thickness with deposition time is optimized by taking a substrate out of bath at regular interval of 3 and not 5 hrs. Hence, film thickness increases exponential with deposition time since concentration decreases exponentially also.
Conductivity measurement of Cd0^nxS0j thin films. The Hall coefficient of a material is a function of the material and the impurity doping level in it. It
is best reported in meters cubed per coulomb (SI units). Unfortunately, it is usually reported in the
units (cm / C). In the determination of Rh, LabView was used to control the drift current in the Hall sample. In addition to controlling the drift current, the VI recorded data from the two volt meters in the gauss meter (Figure 5). One of the meters measured the voltage across the resistor in the drift circuit (bottom), while the other measured the voltage across the y-direction of the probe (the hall voltage).
Figure 5 - Graph of thickness against conductivity
As the computer steps up the driving voltage (and therefore drift current) it recorded the value from each of these meters and the output them when the program finishes [13]. The probe is made of InAs (indium arsenide) who has a near
constant Hall coefficient so, hence giving a very close to a straight line (VH vs I) with a slope that is related to the Hall constant Rh as shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6 - Hall measurement
The Hall Effect probe is a thin slab of InAs, cemented to a piece of fiberglass and has a four lead cable is attached so that the necessary electrical circuit can be used to detect the Hall voltage. The white and green wires are used to measure the Hall voltage and the red and black wires carry the drift current [14].
The values for the dimensions used in our work were as follows w = 0.152 cm, width, L = 0.381 cm, length, d = 69 nm, thickness. Cd0.3ZnxS0.7 has a relatively big band gap so the carrier density was estimated to be roughly the intrinsic carrier density by electrons hence a n-type semi-
conductor. These carriers are produced by the thermal excitation of the electrons from the valence band into the conduction band [15]. This was estimated that Cdo.3ZnxSo.7 has the density of valence electrons was 7 x 1028 m-3) multiplied by the Boltzmann factor:
exp
El
kT
(20)
where E is 2.41 eV and kT is room temperature which is about 1/40 eV [13, 16, 18].
Conclusion
In this work, Cdo.3ZnxSo.7 thin films were grown by chemical bath method with thickness that ranged
from 69 to 330 nm on ordinary microscope per-spex substrates at room temperature. Varying thin film thickness was obtained by changing the deposition time and their resistivity was found to be thickness dependent. Gauss meter measurement showed that the thin films were n-type and semiconducting in nature appropriate for light emitting diodes.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful Department of Mathematics and Physics of Technical University of Mombasa, Mombasa and Maasai Mara University, Narok, for providing laboratory facilities for this work. The authors are also thankful to the Chuka University, Meru for providing access to the Gauss meter for conductivity measurement.
References
1. Al-Sabayleh, M. (2008). The Effect of substrate temperature on the optical properties of spray
deposited ZnS thin films prepared from non-aqueous media. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Science - Medicine - Engineering, 20(1), 17-30.
2. Ashour, A., Afifi, H., & Mahmoud, S. (1994). Effect of some spray pyrolysis parameters on electrical
and optical properties of ZnS films. Thin Solid Films, 248(2), 253-256. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(94)90020-5
3. Bhattacharjee, B., Ganguli, D., Iakoubovskll, K., Stesmans, A., & Chaudhuri, S. (2002). Synthesis and
characterization of sol-gel derived ZnS : Mn2+ nanocrystallites embedded in a silica matrix. Bulletin of Materials Science, 25(3), 175-180. doi: 10.1007/bf02711150
4. Cheng, J., Fang, D., Wang, H., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., & Yan, H. (2003). Chemical bath deposition of
crystalline ZnS thin films. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 18(7), 676-679. doi: 10.1088/0268-1242/18/7/313
5. Kitagawa, M., Tomomura, Y., Nakanishi, K., Suzuki, A., & Nakajima, S. (1990). Photo-assisted
homoepitaxial growth of ZnS by molecular beam epitaxy. Journal of Cristal Growth, 1 oi (1-4), 5255. doi: 10.1016/0022-0248(90)90935-E
6. Mosiori C., Maera, J., & Njoroge, W. (2015). Absorbance in chemical bath deposited CuS thin films.
Standard Scientific Research and Essays, 2(13), 739-742.
7. Mosiori, C. (2013). Effect of dielectric constant on energy losses in lead sulphide thin films grown by
solution method at room temperature. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 8(34), 17161721.
8. Mosiori, C., Njoroge, W., & Okumu, J. (2014). Electrical and optical characterization of CdxZm-xS thin
films deposited by chemical bath deposition in alkaline conditions. Direct Research Journal of Chemistry and Material Science, 2(1), 13-20.
9. Mosiori, C., Maera, J., Njoroge, W., Shikambe, T., Munji, M., & Magare, R. (2015). Modeling Transfer of
Electrons between Energy States of an Electrolyte and CdS thin Films using Gerischer Model. Engineering International, 3(1), 35-44.
10. Mosiori, C., & Maera, J. (2015) Electrical Analysis of Bis (2-Amino-4-Methylpyridinium)
Tetrachloridozincate Compound Grown by Chemical Bath Deposition at Ambient Temperature and Pressure Conditions. Chemistry Journal, 5(6), 108-114.
11. Mosiori, C., Njororge, W., & Okumu, J. (2014). Optical and Electrical Properties of Pbs Thin Films
Grown by Chemically Bath Deposition [CBD] at Different Lead Concentrations. International Journal of Advanced Research in Physical Science, 1(1), 25-32.
12. Nadeem, M., & Ahmed, W. (2000). Optical Properties of ZnS Thin Films. Turkish Journal of Physics, 4,
651-659.
13. Nair, P., & Nair, M. (1992). Chemically deposited ZnS thin films: application as substrate for
chemically deposited Bi2S3, CuxS and PbS thin films. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 7(2), 239-244.
14. Pike, R. D., Cui, H., Kershaw, R., Dwight, K., & Wold, A. (1993). Preparation of zinc sulfide thin films
by ultrasonic spray pyrolsis from bis(diethyldithiocarbamato) zinc(II). Thin Solid Films, 224(2), 221-226. doi: 10.1016/0040-6090(93)90436-S
15. Su, B., & Choy, K. (2000). Electrostatic assisted aerosol jet deposition of CdS, CdSe, and ZnS thin
films. Thin Solid Films, 361-362, 102-106. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00857-3
16. Ubale, A. U., & Kulkani, D. K. (2005). Preparation and study of thickness dependent electrical
characteristics of zinc sulfide thin films. Bulletin of Materials Science, 28(1), 43-47. doi: 10.1007/bf02711171
17. Ugwu, E., & Onah, D. (2007). Optical Characteristics of Chemical Bath Grown CdS Thin Film
Characteristics within UV, Visible, and NIR Radiation. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 8(1), 155-161.
18. Zhang, R., Wang, B., Wan, D., & Wei, L. (2004). Effects of the sulfidation temperature on the
structure, composition and optical properties of ZnS films prepared by sulfurizing ZnO films. Optical Materials, 27(3), 419-423. doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2004.03.020
