Научная статья на тему 'Effects of Moringa oleifera Leaf Meal on Local Guinea Fowl Breeder Hens’ Performance, Egg Quality, and Blood Parameters'

Effects of Moringa oleifera Leaf Meal on Local Guinea Fowl Breeder Hens’ Performance, Egg Quality, and Blood Parameters Текст научной статьи по специальности «Животноводство и молочное дело»

CC BY
0
0
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
Blood parameter / Breeder / Guinea fowl / Egg quality / Moringa oleifera

Аннотация научной статьи по животноводству и молочному делу, автор научной работы — Patrik Nukunu Komi Atitso, Oumbortime Nnanle, Kokou Voemesse, Lamboni Lare, Komi Attivi

Breeding local guinea fowl has the potential to address protein malnutrition and alleviate poverty in West African countries. The current study aimed to examine the effects of incorporating Moringa oleifera leaf meal into the diet on hematology and biochemical parameters as well as the productive performance of local guinea fowl breeders in Togo. Thus, 512 local guinea fowls (22 weeks of age with an average weight of 1176.7 ± 2.9 g), comprising 384 females and 128 males, were examined for 31 weeks. The fowls were randomly assigned to four dietary groups, namely M0, M1, M2, and M3 containing 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% of Moringa oleifera leaf meal in diets, respectively. Each group had 4 replicates of 32 fowls. During the study, feed intake, body weight, egg-laying rate, and feed conversion ratio were weekly recorded. Blood samples for hematology and biochemical analysis were taken from 12 females (3/replicate) at 34 and 50 weeks of age. Eggs were collected for the quality evaluation. Results showed that feed intake was comparable across all groups during the rearing period (23 to 33 weeks of age). However, it significantly decreased in fowls of the M2 and M3 during the laying period (34 to 50 weeks of age). The live weight of fowls in M3 was significantly higher than other groups before the laying period. The egg production, yolk ratio, and shell ratio of the birds in the M1 were like that of M0 and higher than that of M2 and M3. The feed conversion ratio was not significantly different between groups during the laying period. However, the albumen ratio and haugh unit were improved by feeding Moringa leaves especially at level 1.5%. The level of white blood cells and lymphocytes decreased by feeding the Moringa leaves at 1%. Neutrophils and platelet levels were comparable across groups. Total proteins, albumin, and transaminases increased in Moringa groups (M1, M2, M3), especially in M3. It was concluded that the use of Moringa oleifera leaves at 0.5% improved egg-laying performance in local guinea fowl. Moreover, 1% and 1.5% of incorporation improved the quality of eggs.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Effects of Moringa oleifera Leaf Meal on Local Guinea Fowl Breeder Hens’ Performance, Egg Quality, and Blood Parameters»

JWPR

Journal of World's

Poultry Research

2024, Scienceline Publication

J. World Poult. Res. 14(1): 75-87, 2024

Research Paper DOI: https://dx.doi.Org/10.36380/jwpr.2024.8 PII: S232245 5X2400007-14

ISSN: 2322-455X License: CC BY 4.0

Effects of Moringa oleifera Leaf Meal on Local Guinea Fowl Breeder Hens' Performance, Egg Quality, and Blood Parameters

Patrik Nukunu Komi Atitso1*©, Oumbortime N'nanle © , Kokou Voemesse ' © Lamboni Lare1 Komi Attivi1

and Kafui Amivi Tete-Benissan ' ©

'Regional Center of Excellence on Avian Sciences, University ofLomé (CERSA/UL) 01 B.P. 1515 Lomé, Togo.

2Forestry Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, University ofLomé, 01 B.P. 1515 Lomé, Togo 3Togolese Institute of Agricultural Research (ITRA-Togo) B.P. 1163 Lome,Togo

Corresponding author's E-mail: patrikkomiatitso@gmail.com

Received: January 18, 2024, Revised: February 22, 2024, Accepted: March 01, 2024, Published: March 25, 2024

ABSTRACT

Breeding local guinea fowl has the potential to address protein malnutrition and alleviate poverty in West African countries. The current study aimed to examine the effects of incorporating Moringa oleifera leaf meal into the diet on hematology and biochemical parameters as well as the productive performance of local guinea fowl breeders in Togo. Thus, 512 local guinea fowls (22 weeks of age with an average weight of 1176.7 ± 2.9 g), comprising 384 females and 128 males, were examined for 31 weeks. The fowls were randomly assigned to four dietary groups, namely M0, M1, M2, and M3 containing 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% of Moringa oleifera leaf meal in diets, respectively. Each group had 4 replicates of 32 fowls. During the study, feed intake, body weight, egg-laying rate, and feed conversion ratio were weekly recorded. Blood samples for hematology and biochemical analysis were taken from 12 females (3/replicate) at 34 and 50 weeks of age. Eggs were collected for the quality evaluation. Results showed that feed intake was comparable across all groups during the rearing period (23 to 33 weeks of age). However, it significantly decreased in fowls of the M2 and M3 during the laying period (34 to 50 weeks of age). The live weight of fowls in M3 was significantly higher than other groups before the laying period. The egg production, yolk ratio, and shell ratio of the birds in the M1 were like that of M0 and higher than that of M2 and M3. The feed conversion ratio was not significantly different between groups during the laying period. However, the albumen ratio and haugh unit were improved by feeding Moringa leaves especially at level 1.5%. The level of white blood cells and lymphocytes decreased by feeding the Moringa leaves at 1%. Neutrophils and platelet levels were comparable across groups. Total proteins, albumin, and transaminases increased in Moringa groups (M1, M2, M3), especially in M3. It was concluded that the use of Moringa oleifera leaves at 0.5% improved egg-laying performance in local guinea fowl. Moreover, 1% and 1.5% of incorporation improved the quality of eggs.

Keywords: Blood parameter, Breeder, Guinea fowl, Egg quality, Moringa oleifera

INTRODUCTION

The rapid human population growth has led to an increase in meat consumption (Boko et al., 2012; Popkin et al., 2012). The breeding of local guinea fowls (Numida meleagris) is one of the animal production sectors that contributes to meeting the animal protein requirements of the population in West African countries (Konlan et al., 2011; Sodjedo et al., 2022). Local guinea fowl production is considered in West African countries, especially in

Togo, as a sector for poverty reduction (Konlan et al., 2011; Sodjedo et al., 2022). It originates from Africa (Ikani and Dafwang, 2004), and guinea fowls have also a cultural significance (Kone et al., 2018). However, guinea fowl production still faces many difficulties such as low growth and availability of post-hatch juveniles and their high mortality rate during the start (Sanfo et al., 2008; Houndonougbo et al., 2017). Also, laying in local guinea

To cite this paper: Atitso PNK, N'nanle O, Voemesse K, Lare L, Attivi K, and Tete-Benissan KA (2024). Effects of Moringa oleifera Leaf Meal on Local Guinea Fowl Breeder Hens' Performance, Egg Quality, and Blood Parameters. J. World Poult. Res., 14(1): 75-87. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.36380/jwpr.20248

fowl is in cycles (about 75 to 110 eggs per year) and coincides with the rainy season (Konlan et al., 2011; Sodjedo et al., 2022). However, Sodjedo et al. (2022) reported that guinea fowl can lay throughout the year if they are fed adequate feed ad libitum. Thus, feed is one of the major factors in developing local guinea fowl breeding (Lombo et al., 2018).

Several studies have shown that the nutritional composition of feed consumed by chickens influences egg laying, egg quality, and hatchability (Teteh et al., 2016; Voemesse et al., 2019; N'nanle et al., 2020). The productivity of animals can be enhanced by utilizing natural feed additives derived from herbs, spices, or other plants. These additives exert positive effects on digestibility, nutrient absorption, and the control of parasites in the digestive tract (Sadr et al., 2022; Eftekhari Hasan Abad and Ghaniei, 2023; Nyembo et al., 2023). Curcuma longa, incorporated at the levels of 0.5% and 1% in layer mash has improved egg weight, shell thickness, and yolk ratio (Radwan et al., 2008). Houndonougbo et al. (2012) reported significant improvement in egg weight, albumen, and yolk ratio of guinea fowls at 21 and 32 weeks of age when incorporating dried leaves of Manihot esculenta into their layer mash.

Moringa oleifera is a leguminous plant and a feed additive used in animal production (Ahmed and Lohakare, 2021; Giang et al., 2023). Its leaves are rich in carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, minerals, salts, and vitamins (Kashyap et al., 2022; Ahmed et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2023a). Moringa oleifera is known to have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, cholesterol-reducing, and hepatoprotective properties (Khalid et al., 2023; Kashyap et al., 2022; Ntshambiwa et al., 2023). The leaves contain also antinutritional substances such as tannins, saponins that limit their use (Khalid et al., 2023; Kashyap et al., 2022). In breeding, several studies have shown an improvement in the production performance of cows (Mendieta-Araica et al., 2011), small ruminants (Fadiyimu et al., 2010; Sultana et al., 2015), rabbits (Abubakar et al., 2015) with the use of Moringa oleifera leaves. In poultry, Voemesse et al. (2019) and Ahmed and Lohakare (2021) reported an increase in the production and weight of eggs when Moringa leaves are incorporated into the diet of laying hens. Yang et al. (2023b) have shown an improvement in feed conversion ratio (from hatching to 4 weeks of age), laying rate, average egg weight, and feed conversion rate in laying ducks fed with Moringa flavonoid meal diets. The leaves of Moringa Oleifera improved the performance (feed conversion ratio, laying rate, average egg weight) of

Sasso breeder hens and the internal quality of hatching eggs (N'nanle et al., 2020). Moringa oleifera also improves broiler chicken growth performance (Body weight gain, feed conversion ratio), carcass characteristics, and cecal microbial structure (El-Tazi 2014; Zhang et al., 2023).

Despite numerous studies and scientific reports on the effects of Moringa oleifera leaves, research on the incorporation of Moringa oleifera leaf meal in enhancing the productive performance of local guinea fowl breeders remains limited. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the effects of Moringa oleifera leaf meal on hematology and biochemical parameters as well as the productive performance of local guinea fowl breeders.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ethical approval

The animal care guidelines recommended by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Lome in Togo were followed (008/2021/BC-BPA/FDS-UL).

Study area

The Regional Center of Excellence in Poultry Sciences (CERSA) of the University of Lomé in Togo served as a framework for the study. The manipulations were conducted in the Poultry Production Techniques laboratories of the Regional Center of Excellence in Poultry Sciences and the laboratories of the Higher School of Biological and Feed Techniques (ESTBA) of the University of Lomé. The experimental management of the breeders lasted 31 weeks, from November 2021 to June 2022. The guinea fowl were provided by the Poultry Production Techniques laboratories of the Regional Center of Excellence in Poultry Sciences.

Preparation of Moringa oleifera leaves and diet formulation

Moringa oleifera leaves were collected from rural areas of Togo (in Togoville: 6°14'28.68"N and 1°29'06.43"E; in the prefecture of Vo), spread out on a clean surface and dried with natural ventilation. The dried leaves were milled into powder form before their incorporation into feed. The experimental diets were formulated to contain 0% (control), 0.5% (500g added to 100kg of diet), 1% (1000g added to 100kg of diet), and 1.5% (1500g added to 100kg of diet) of dry matter of Moringa oleifera leaves. All diets were iso-nitrogenous and iso-caloric. The compositions of the experimental diets are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Composition (%) of experimental diets according to Moringa oleifera treatments during 22-31 weeks of age and 3250 week of age (laying period) in guinea fowl_

Feed composition according to age and group

22-31 weeks of age 32-50 weeks of age

Ingredient M0 | M1 M2 1 M3 M0 1 M1 M2 M3

Maize 54 53.5 53.5 53 59 59 59 59

Wheat bran 17 17 17 17 13 12.5 12 12

Roasted soybean 19 19 18.5 18.5 18 18 18 17.5

Laying concentrate 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

oyster shell 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

Methionine 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Lysine 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Moringa oleifera leaf 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5

Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Calculated analysis

ME (Kcal/Kg) 2787 2791 2795 2799 2849 2860 2870 2873

Crude protein (%) 17.72 17.67 17.45 17.40 17.06 17.13 17.21 17.13

Calcium (%) 2.27 2.26 2.26 2.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 2.30

Phosphorus (%) 0.53 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.49 0.48 0.48 0.48

Methionine (%) 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78

Lysine (%) 1.07 1.07 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03

Methionine + Cystine (%) 1.02 1.02 1.01 1.01 1 1 0.99 0.99

ME: Metabolizable energy; M0, M1, M2, M3: Treatments with 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% Moringa oleifera leaves in diet, respectively. The study lasted 28 weeks.

Study design and animal management

For this study, a total of 384 female local guinea fowl breeders and 128 males, all aged 22 weeks, were randomly divided equally into four dietary treatments, each with four replicates. This distribution entailed 24 females and 8 males per replicate following a study by Sodjedo et al. (2022). In each replicate, including the control group (M0) and three other groups (M1, M2, M3), guinea fowls were fed accordingly. The control group was provided with a basal diet devoid of Moringa oleifera leaves. The other treatment groups received the same basal diet, with the addition of 0.5% (M1), 1% (M2), and 1.5% (M3) dry matter of Moringa oleifera leaves. After one week of acclimatization, the four experimental diets were randomly assigned and fed to the guinea fowls ad libitum. Guinea fowls were reared in an open henhouse, wood partitioned (2.7 m x 2 m) with a deep litter floor housing system at a density of 6 per square meter (Nahashon et al., 2006). Water was offered ad libitum throughout the experiment and natural light (dry season with 25°C on average and rainy season with 27.3°C on average) was used as the source of lighting. All treatments followed the same prophylaxis program, including anti-infection prevention with oxyfuran 4® (1g/l of water) for days 1 to 4, anti-Newcastle vaccine with Hitchner B1 for day 3, coccidiosis prevention with Amprolium 20%® (3g/5l of water) for days 12 to 16, deworming with Pipérazine citrate® (2g/l of water for 1 day) and anti-Newcastle vaccine with Cevac® for week 3, deworming with VSP® (% tablet for 1 day) for week 8, anti-infection prevention with oxyfuran 4® (1g/l

of water for 5 days) for week 10, an anti-Newcastle vaccine with Ita-New for week 14, deworming with VSV® for week 17, coccidiosis prevention with Amprolium 20%® (3g/5l of water for 5 days) for week 22, and deworming with VSV® for week 26 (Hien et al., 2002; Lombo et al., 2011).

Data collection and calculated parameters

Throughout the experiment, the amount of feed offered to the breeders each day was measured. Feed intake (FI) was calculated weekly as the difference between feed offered and leftover for each replication. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as the ratio of total feed consumed to total body weight gain (BWG) before laying (total Fl/total BWG, Voemesse et al., 2018). During the laying period, eggs were collected daily, and the laying rate was registered weekly (sum of daily egg number x 100/sum of daily bird number). Feed conversion ratio was calculated with average egg laying rate, egg weight, and FI as grams of egg mass per gram of feed consumed (daily FI/[laying rate x average egg weight]) following N'nanle et al. (2020).

At the onset of the experiment and then every week before the egg-laying period, the fowls underwent weighing to ascertain BWG corresponding to their respective treatment groups. Body weight gain was computed by subtracting the initial weight from the successive body weight measurements during the experimental (final weight-initial weight). Additionally, daily weight gain (DWG) was calculated as the ratio of BWG to the duration of the

experimental period (in days). Mortalities recorded were utilized to calculate the mortality rate.

At 38, 42, 46, and 50 weeks of breeders' age, 32 eggs per treatment were weighed and broken delicately to collect shell, albumen, and yolk (N'nanle et al., 2020). These components were also weighed to determine their ratio (component weight x 100/absolute egg weight, N'nanle et al., 2020) and Haugh Unit (HU) with the following relationship, HU = 100 x log (Hb - 1.7W 0 37 + 7.6), where, Hb denotes the height of thick albumen and W is egg weight (N'nanle et al., 2020).

At the end of the experiment, abdominal fat and organs (heart, liver, kidney, intestine, and gizzard), randomly taken from 8 females per treatment were weighed to determine their ratio (abdominal fat or organs weight x 100/live weight, N'nanle et al., 2020). Fowls were stunned and slaughtered for the samples.

At 33 and 50 weeks of breeders' age, venous blood samples (wing vein, approximately 2 ml) were taken from 12 females (chosen at random) per treatment. These blood samples were collected in tubes containing Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid (EDTA) for blood count and blood formula (NFS) and in dry tubes, without anticoagulant, for assay of biochemical parameters. For hematological parameters, the blood samples were used on Mindray BC-3000 Auto Hematology Analyzer, from Mindray Buiding, Keji 12th Road South, High-tech Industrial Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen 518057, P.R. China. For biochemical parameters, blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm. Serum was collected for total protein, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine, uric acid, urea, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL-Cholesterol measuring. Blood parameters were determined by colorimetric method using Mindray BS Auto-biochemical analyzer from China.

Statistical analysis

All data collected were analyzed using ANOVA with GraphPad Prism 8.1 software followed by Tukey's test for comparisons between treatments. Data obtained were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of the mean and as a percentage. Results were statistically significant when p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Feed intake

The effect of Moringa oleifera leaves on FI before and during lay is presented in Table 2. According to the

result of the study, there was no significant difference in FI across treatments before laying (23 to 33 weeks of age, p > 0.05). However, during the laying (34 to 50 weeks of age), guinea fowls in M2 and M3 had significantly lower FI, compared to those in other groups (p < 0.05).

Daily weight gain

Before egg-laying, the daily weight gain was comparable between treatments M0, M1, and M2, but significantly lower than that of the M3 treatment, as indicated in Table 3 (p < 0.05).

Egg laying rate and egg weight

Figure 1 shows the effect of Moringa oleifera leaves on the improvement of the laying rate according to the age of guinea fowls. Egg laying rates were similar among treatments from week 34 to week 39 of breeders' age (p > 0.05). However, starting from week 40, the laying rate of groups M0 and M1 exceeded that of other groups, except for week 49 when laying rates remained similar between treatments (p < 0.05).

The average laying rate of groups M0 and M1 was higher than that of groups M2 and M3, as shown in Table 3 (p < 0.05).

The average egg weight increased with breeders' age in each group and there was no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05) although M3 had numerically the highest egg weight (Table 3).

Feed conversion ratio

The FCR, before and during the laying period, is shown in Table 2. Before laying, FCR values of groups M0, M1, and M2 were not significantly different (p > 0.05) but significantly higher than that of group M3 (p < 0.05). During laying, FCR values of all treatments were insignificantly different (p > 0.05). However, M2 and M3 groups recorded numerically the highest FCR.

Mortality rate

The mortality rate was relatively low in all groups. Group M0 recorded a higher rate of mortality (p < 0.05) and there was no significant difference between the M1 and M2 groups (p > 0.05). The M3 treatment recorded the lowest mortality rate (Table 3).

Average weight of organs and abdominal fat

Concerning gizzard weight the difference between treatments was insignificant (p > 0.05). The weight of the liver and the intestine of the guinea fowls of group M3 was significantly higher than that of the M0, M1, and M2

groups (p < 0.05). For these same parameters, the difference was not significant between M1 and M2 groups (p > 0.05). The M0 group recorded the lowest values (p < 0.05) of liver and intestine weight. The absolute heart weight values of groups M2 and M3 were higher than those of M0 and M1 (p < 0.05). Abdominal fat and carcass weight were higher in groups M0 and M1 than in groups M2 and M3, although the difference was not significant in the fat abdominal area (p > 0.05), as shown in Table 4.

Egg components and haugh unit

Table 5 shows the yolk ratio albumen ratio and shell ratio. Concerning the yolk ratio and shell ratio the difference was insignificant between all groups. The albumin ratio of groups M3 and M2 was significantly higher than that of M0 and M1 groups, especially at 38 and 50 weeks of age (p < 0.05).

Concerning the Haugh Unit, there was no significant difference across all groups at week 38 (p > 0.05). However, at 42, 46, and 50 weeks of age, the Haugh Unit of eggs from M3 breeders was significantly higher compared to the other groups, while the group M0 recorded the lowest values, as shown in Figure 2 (p < 0.05).

Hematological parameters

The level of white blood cells (WBC) and lymphocytes detected in guinea fowls of M0 and M1 treatments were higher than that of M2 and M3 treatments

(p < 0.05) at 34 and 50 weeks of age. Regarding the red blood cell (RBC) count, there were insignificant differences between treatments (p > 0.05). At 34 weeks of age, blood platelets and neutrophils showed no significant differences among all treatments (p > 0.05). However, at 50 weeks of age, blood platelet levels decreased with the incorporation of Moringa oleifera leaves in the M2 and M3 groups (Table 6).

Biochemical parameters

Serum parameter concentrations are summarized in Table 7. Total protein level at 50 weeks of age was significantly higher in treatments M1, M2, and M3, compared to the control group (p < 0.05). At 34 weeks of age, the levels of alanine aminotransferase and uric acid were significantly higher in groups M1, M2, and M3, compared to the control (p < 0.05). At 50 weeks of age, the levels of albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and uric acid were significantly higher in groups M1, M2, and M3, compared to the control (p < 0.05). Triglyceride levels were lower in M1, M2, and M3 compared to M0 at 34 weeks of age (p < 0.05). At 50 weeks of age, triglyceride decreased in M2 and M3, compared to M0 and M1 (p < 0.05). Total cholesterol level decreased in M1, M2, and M3, compared to M0 at 34 weeks of age. There was no significant difference between treatments concerning total cholesterol and HDL-CH levels at 50 weeks of age (p > 0.05).

Table 2. Feed intake and feed conversion ratio according to Moringa oleifera treatments and age of guinea fowls

Age Groups Parameters M0 M1 M2 M3 P-value

23 - 33 FI 60.3 ± 1.8 60.58 ± 1.07 59.36 ± 0.97 61.37 ± 1.4 0.7752

FCR 13.08 ± 0.46a 13.05 ± 0.23a 14.44 ± 0.37a 11.07 ± 0.14b 0.0085

34 - 50 FI 89.76 ± 1.02a 89.57 ± 0.58a 82.62 ± 0.75b 84.04 ± 0.41b 0.0044

FCR 4.44 ± 0.18 4.48 ± 0.11 4.71 ± 0.2 4.55 ± 0.23 0.7536

M0, M1, M2, M3: Treatments having received respectively 0%, 0.5%, 1% and 1.5% Moringa oleifera leaves in the diet; FI: Feed intake FCR: Feed conversion ratio; a ,b,c Within row, values not sharing the same letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Table 3. Daily weight gain (23-33 weeks of age), laying rate and egg weight (34-50 weeks of age), mortality rate (22-50 weeks of age) of guinea fowls according to Moringa oleifera treatments

Groups Parameters M0 M1 M2 M3 P-value

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

DWG (g) 4.20 ± 0.08b 4.23 ± 0.11b 4.04 ± 0.04b 4.88 ± 0.13a 0.0123

Laying rate (%) 50.53 ± 2.02a 49.94 ± 1.88a 43.04 ± 1.74b 44.62 ± 1.58b 0.0188

Egg weight (g) 39.14 ±0.40 39.26 ± 0.43 39.26 ± 0.41 39.75 ± 0.48 0.9143

Mortality rate (%) 15 ± 0.78a 13.33 ± 0.57ab 13.33 ± 0.48ab 11.67 ± 0.24b 0.0473

M0, M1, M2, M3: Treatments having received respectively 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%Moringa oleifera leaves in the diet; DWG: Daily weight gain; a row, values not sharing the same letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

c Within

Table 4. Average weight and ratio of organs and abdominal fat of guinea fowls at 50 weeks of age according to Moringa oleifera treatments_

' -------Groups Parameters ----- M0 Ml M2 M3 p-value

Heart 6.67 ± 0.24b 6.45 ± 0.26b 7.4 ± 0.24ab 8 ± 0.2a 0.0023

Liver 27.33 ± 0.33c 31.33 ± 1.2b 31.67 ± 0.88b 38.67 ± 0.33a <0.0001

Kidney 6 ± 0.41ab 7.25 ± 0.25a 5.88 ± 0.31b 6.5 ± 0.29ab 0.0403

. . . Gizzard Average weight (g) Intestine 27 ± 1.23 27 ± 1.78 27.5 ±1.85 27.75 ±1.11 0.9796

100.75 ± 0.75c 111 ± 1.08b 119.75 ± 1.25b 141 ± 4.45a <0.0001

MPS 73.5 ± 2.22c 92 ± 2.16a 80.25 ± 0.63bc 82 ± 2.04b <0.0001

Abdomina fat 11.50 ± 0.65 11.75 ± 0.48 10.25 ± 0.48 10.5 ± 0.46 0.1678

Carcass 1386.75 ± 34.4ab 1465.25 ± 9.6a 1247.5 ± 19.4c 1300.5 ± 31.9bc 0.0003

Heart 0.4 ± 0.007b 0.37 ± 0.004b 0.48 ± 0.009a 0.51± 0.006a 0.0033

Liver 1.64 ± 0.1b 1.82 ± 0.114b 2.07 ± 0.13ab 2.48 ± 0.1a 0.0002

Kidney 0.36 ± 0.015 0.42 ± 0.011 0.38 ± 0.007 0.42 ± 0.013 0.0923

Gizzard Ratio (%) Intestine 1.62 ± 0.03ab 1.57 ± 0.02b 1.8 ± 0.045a 1.78 ± 0.053ab 0.0496

6.03 ± 0.12c 6.44 ± 0.15c 7.82 ± 0.18b 9.05 ± 0.19a <0.0001

MPS 4.40 ± 0.11 5.34 ± 0.24 5.24 ± 0.19 5.27 ± 0.27 0.1251

Abdominal fat 0.69 ± 0.012 0.68 ± 0.025 0.67 ± 0.015 0.67 ± 0.013 0.1977

Carcass 83.01 ± 0.83ab 85.02 ± 1.01a 81.51 ± 0.92c 83.51 ± 0.81bc 0.0007

M0, M1, M2, M3: Treatments having received respectively 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%Moringa oleifera leaves in their diet; MPS: Superficial pectoral muscle;

a,b,c Within row, values not sharing the same letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Table 5. Egg components ratio of guinea fowls according to Moringa oleifera treatments at different ages

„ Groups Age (weeks) M0 Parameters — Ml M2 M3 p-value

38 34.12 ± 0.1 34.30 ± 1.05 36.08 ± 1.36 32.02 ± 1.01 0.1747

Yolk ratio 42 31.54 ± 0.87 32.06 ± 1.1 32.35 ± 1.1 32.93 ± 0.5 0.7658

46 29.95 ± 1.08 31.12 ± 1.85 29.60 ± 1.2 29.54 ± 0.44 0.7947

50 31.06 ± 0.97 33.12 ± 2.02 30.48 ± 1.08 30.80 ± 2.2 0.6927

38 51.44 ± 0.22bc 50.40 ± 0.2c 52.42 ± 0.12ab 52.99 ± 0.17a 0.0020

Albumen ratio 42 51.53 ± 0.5 51.45 ± 0.21 51.97 ± 0.18 52.28 ± 0.38 0.3931

46 50.59 ± 0.19 51.99 ± 0.56 52.06 ± 1.09 52.78 ± 0.08 0.1376

50 50.42 ± 0.21c 50.94 ± 0.18bc 51.80 ± 0.14b 53.20 ± 0.16a 0.0016

38 14.46 ± 0.29 13.89 ± 0.23 14.20 ± 1.01 14.67 ± 0.17 0.7719

Shell ratio 42 16.38 ± 0.17 16.02 ± 0.84 16.75 ± 0.21 17.49 ± 0.33 0.8667

46 18.60 ± 0.70 19.24 ± 0.98 17.41 ± 1.02 17.68 ± 0.79 0.3690

50 17.66 ± 0.12 16.46 ± 0.67 17.12 ± 0.88 16.60 ± 1.01 0.9327

M0, M1, M2, M3: Treatments having received respectively 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% Moringa oleifera leaves in the diet, a,b,c Within row, values not sharing

the same letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Table 6. Hematology parameters of guinea fowls according to Moringa oleifera treatments at different ages

Age (weeks) Blood parameters Groups M0 Ml M2 M3 p-value

WBC (10 >L) 44.85 ± 0.57b 62.80 ± 2.81a 30.88 ± 0.89c 41.04 ± 3.44b <0.0001

RBC (10 6/^L) 2.55 ± 0.16 2.34 ± 0.30 2.19 ± 0.13 2.23 ± 0.13 0.5795

Hemoglobin (g/dl) 11.17 ± 0.49a 9.17 ± 1.37b 9.20 ± 0.36b 9.13 ± 1.04b 0.0347

Hematocrit (%) 34 PLT (10 >L) 41.57 ± 3.08a 38.13 ± 5.11ab 37.70 ± 2.4b 37.43 ± 3.74b 0.0184

1.67 ± 0.33 1.33 ± 0.33 2.33 ± 0.67 2.33 ± 0.33 0.3437

Neutrophil (10 3/^L) 15.93 ± 3.02 33.54 ± 11.4 20.49 ± 1.8 37.60 ± 18.8 0.5022

Lymphocyte (10 3/^L) 14.06 ± 0.3b 23.39 ± 4.5a 9.29 ± 1.28c 12.28 ± 4.25b 0.0125

Monocyte (10 3/^L) 1.59 ± 1.2 0.45 ± 0.1 0.54 ± 0.07 0.66 ± 0.39 0.6171

Basophil (10 3/^L) 7.04 ± 2.2 5.48 ± 0.5 7.23 ± 0.5 6.15 ± 0.6 0.7224

WBC (10 >L) 92.01 ± 4.2a 64.53 ± 5.78b 35.80 ± 2.9c 61.97 ± 6.8b <0.0001

RBC (10 6/^L) 2.43 ± 0.08 2.35 ± 0.27 2.54 ± 0.26 2.59 ± 0.3 0.8988

Hemoglobin (g/dl) 9.40 ± 0.46 9.43 ±1.7 9.77 ± 1.5 11 ± 1.6 0.8267

Hematocrit (%) 38.73 ± 0.74b 38.93 ± 7.8b 42.13 ± 5.8ab 45.63 ± 5.9a 0.0028

50 PLT (10 3/^L) 1.67 ± 0.33 1 ± 0.58 1 ± 0.58 0.67 ± 0.33 0.5319

Neutrophil (10 >L) 59.73 ± 19.62! 40.34 ± 26.3b 15.76 ± 1.6c 36.28 ± 9.9b 0.0028

Lymphocyte (10 3/^L) 25.16 ± 6.35a 17.81 ± 8.7b 11.41 ± 2.34c 14.14 ± 1.06bc <0.0001

Monocyte (10 3/^L) 0.30 ± 0.03 0.25 ± 0.02 0.30 ± 0.1 0.28 ± 0.04 0.9130

Basophil (10 3/^L) 6.82±1.6 6.17±1.4 7.33±1.3 7.93±1.7 0.8562

M0, M1, M2, M3: Treatments having received respectively 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%Moringa oleifera leaves in the diet; WBC: White blood cell; RBC: Red blood cell; PLT: Blood platelets; a,b,c Within row, values not sharing the same letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Table 7. Biochemical parameters of guinea fowls according to Moringa oleifera treatment at different ages

GIUUpS M0 Ml M2 M3 p-value

Age (weeks) Blood parameters

Total protein (g/L) 30.9 ± 0.33a 23.7 ± 0.48b 25.85 ± 0.14b 25.95 ± 1.14b <0.0001

Albumin (g/L) 7 ± 0.29b 7.1 ± 0.36b 7.2 ± 0.12b 9.13 ± 0.26a 0.0003

AST (U/L) 251.5 ± 2.87c 251.25 ± 3.04c 271.25 ± 1.7b 300.5 ± 3.86a <0.0001

ALT (U/L) 9 ± 0.41c 12 ± 0.41ab 11.75 ± 0.32b 13.5 ± 0.35a <0.0001

34 Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.14 ± 0.04 0.21 ± 0.07 0.11 ± 0.03 0.14 ± 0.04 0.5290

Uric Acid (mg/dl) 6.4 ± 0.24c 7.5 ± 0.38b 6.95 ± 0.27bc 8.75 ± 0.36a 0.0249

Urea (g/L) 0.03 ± 0.007 0.03 ± 0.004 0.03 ± 0.007 0.03 ± 0.004 0.9780

Triglycerides (g/L) 5.86 ± 0.13a 3.52 ± 0.1c 5.30 ± 0.11b 2.95 ± 0.13d <0.0001

Cholesterol (g/L) 1.34 ± 0.12a 0.85 ± 0.04b 0.99 ± 0.04b 1.07 ± 0.04b 0.0034

HDL-CH (g/L) 0.37 ±0.04 0.45 ± 0.02 0.34 ± 0.04 0.45 ± 0.03 0.1068

Total protein (g/L) 27.53 ± 1.9b 41.35 ± 1a 37.93 ± 0.55a 39.08 ± 0.62a <0.0001

Albumin (g/L) 5.38 ± 0.19b 6.73 ± 0.18a 7.28 ± 0.28a 7.23 ± 0.16a <0.0001

AST (U/L) 252 ± 4.04c 333.5 ± 10b 381.25 ± 4.42a 356.75 ± 5.2ab <0.0001

ALT (U/L) 4.5 ± 0.29c 8 ± 0.2a 6 ± 0.41b 7.5 ± 0.29a <0.0001

50 Creatinine (mg/dl) 0.18 ± 0.01b 0.25 ± 0.02ab 0.25 ± 0.03ab 0.30 ± 0.02a 0.0118

Uric Acid (mg/dl) 5.45 ± 0.22c 7.49 ± 0.35b 6.59 ± 0.18b 9.38 ± 0.26a <0.0001

Urea (g/L) 0.03 ±0.007 0.03 ± 0.005 0.04 ± 0.008 0.04 ± 0.005 0.3362

Triglycerides (g/L) 5.37 ± 0.13b 7.20 ± 0.3a 4.44 ± 0.43bc 4.12 ± 0.09c <0.0001

Cholesterol (g/L) 1.15 ± 0.05 1.31 ± 0.08 1.20 ± 0.19 1.16 ± 0.13 0.8726

HDL-CH (g/L) 0.35 ± 0.06 0.34 ± 0.08 0.35 ± 0.1 0.44 ± 0.1 0.8548

M0, M1, M2, M3: Treatments having received respectively 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%Moringa oleifera leaves in the diet; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; HDL-CH: High density lipoproteins-cholesterol; a,b,c Within a row, values not sharing the same letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Figurel. Laying rate according to age (34-50 weeks of age) and Moringa oleifera treatment (* show significant difference at 0.05). M0, M1, M2, M3: Treatments having received 0%, 0.5%, 1% and 1.5% Moringa oleifera leaves in diet respectively; at each age, significant differences are indicated by *(p < 0,05); ** (p < 0,01); *** (p < 0.001).

Figure 2. Haugh Unit according to different ages (38, 42, 46, and 50 week of age) and Moringa oleifera treatment. M0, M1,

M2, M3: Treatments having received respectively 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% Moringa oleifera leaves in diet; a,b,c Within a row, values not sharing the same letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

3

n

100 80 60 40 20 0

P = 0.9578 <-8

T

38

p = 0.0357

p = 0.0488

P = 0.0277 <->

bin b ab b b b

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

t 42

r 46

T

50

Guinea fowls age (weeks)

M0 M1 =3 M 2 M3

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrated clearly that the incorporation of Moringa oleifera leaves in the local guinea fowl breeder diet affected productive performance, hematological as well as biochemical values, and egg quality. Before the laying period, the similarity in FI is comparable to that reported by Voemesse et al. (2018) in laying chickens during juvenile growth and Teteh et al. (2016) in ISA brown chicks (layer-type). Sanchez et al., (2006) estimated that Moringa oleifera leaves did not contain any factors that could limit feed consumption. However, a decrease in feed consumption with 10% of Moringa oleifera leaves in one-week-old chicks was obtained by Ashong and Brown (2011). This difference could be explained by the level of incorporation of Moringa oleifera leaves, which reached a maximum of 1.5% in this experiment. Additionally, it is important to consider the poultry species used in this study, which was guinea fowl, as opposed to laying chickens or ISA brown chicks examined in the studies referenced. In the laying period, the decrease in feed consumption in M2 and M3 was also reported by N'nanle et al. (2020) on Sasso breeding hens and Voemesse et al. (2019) on laying hens. This result could be explained by the cumulative effect of Moringa oleifera leaves with the age of animals, which would increase the level of components such as saponins, tannins, and fibers (Gupa et al., 1989; Kakengi et al., 2007). According to Francis et al. (2001), the presence of these substances creates a feeling of satiety in animals and

slows down the progression of feed in the digestive tract. This situation could lead to a decrease in feed consumption. Furthermore, the higher weight of intestines observed in the Moringa oleifera groups could be attributed to a slowing down of feed progression in the digestive tract.

The reduction of FCR in group M3 is consistent with the increase in weight gain of fowls in the same group. The same results were reported by Sarker et al. (2017) and Teteh et al (2013) in broilers and by Teteh (2016) and Voemesse et al. (2018) in laying hens. The high BWG in M3 treatment could be due to the richness and quality of the nutrients contained in Moringa leaves (Teteh et al., 2016; Manzo et al., 2016). Likewise, Moringa oleifera leaves have antimicrobial (Djakalia et al., 2011; Divya et al., 2014; Ahmed et al., 2023), immunomodulatory (Tété-Bénissan et al., 2013), and antioxidant (Santos et al., 2012; Wiwit et al., 2016) properties that can improve animal health and nutrients uptake. Thus, by reducing intestinal microflora (Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus), Moringa oleifera leaves reduce gut competition for available nutrients (Voemesse et al., 2019; Ahmed et al., 2023). This mechanism contributes to the higher concentration of proteins, such as albumin in blood which is known as one of the main serum proteins serving as an amino acid source for the synthesis of tissue proteins in the growth period of birds (Yaman et al., 2000). All these factors would have contributed to the better BWG obtained by the M3 group. Furthermore, the hematological results at the start of the lay show a significant decrease in

white blood cell counts and lymphocytes with Moringa oleifera leaves levels in the diet. However it shows that a high white blood cell count is associated with an infection or the presence of foreign bodies or antigens in the circulating system (Ahamefule et al., 2008). The decrease in these immune cells is therefore synonymous with improving animal health.

The higher laying rate in M0 and Ml treatments confirms the results of Teteh et al. (2016) and Voemesse et al. (2019) in laying hens with the difference that the best level of incorporation of Moringa oleifera leaves for laying is 0.5% in the present study against 1% in Teteh et al. (2016) and Voemesse et al. (2019). The same results were reported by N'nanle et al. (2020) in Sasso breeders with 1% of Moringa oleifera leaves. This difference would be linked to the species of poultry used for the experiment. The lowest laying performance of M2 and M3 could be related to the high level of Moringa oleifera leaves which might increase estrogens level, because of phytoestrogens contained in the leaves (Zade and Dabhadkar 2014). Indeed, Zade and Dabhadkar (2014) obtained in rats a decrease of FSH and LH, associated with phytoestrogens, thus leading to an increase in the duration of the ovarian cycle of rats. In addition, Titi et al. (2013) showed that sterols contained in Moringa oleifera leaves are used as precursors for estrogen synthesis. These results confirm the reports of Musa-Azara et al. (2014) who claimed that the intake of some amount of estrogenic substances in Moringa leaves inhibits the secretion of LH and FSH and reduces endogenous estrogen and progesterone levels. This reduction may play a role in the low number of follicles and consequently a decrease in the laying rate.

The improvement in egg weight with the level of Moringa oleifera leaves is in agreement with that of N'nanle et al. (2020) in Sasso breeders and Teteh et al. (2016) in layers. According to the study of Suk and Park (2001), heavy eggs have proportionally more albumen and less yolk. However, the results of this study showed that the proportion of albumen was higher in the eggs from M2 and M3 treatments compared to M0 and M1. Thus, the amino acids profile of Moringa oleifera leaves notably the sulfurous amino acids which are essential for protein synthesis improve egg weight (Bunchasak, 2009). In addition, the phytochemical analysis of Moringa leaves revealed a significant presence of selenium (Tarmizi et al., 2023). This component could also justify the high egg weight of M3 treatment according to Attia et al. (2010) who indicated that the use of organic selenium sources improves egg weight.

The increase in albumen ratio, positively correlated with Haugh Unit would be due to the concentration of amino acids, vitamins, mineral salts, and other compounds contained in Moringa oleifera leaves (Yang et al., 2006; Moyo et al., 2012; Kashyap et al., 2022). Brought to the breeding hens these components would stimulate the synthesis of albumin by the liver, thus causing the increased serum albumen level and consequently the increase of albumen ratio (N'nanle et al. 2020).

The similar yolk ratio between treatments could be explained by the yolk formation process according to the results of Nys et al. (2011). These authors claimed that during the formation of yolk from embryogenesis, the lipoproteins are transported from the liver to the ovaries where they are deposited in oocytes to form follicles. Thus, nutritional problems related to the feeding of breeders have little influence on the yolk ratio. The maximum rate of 1.5% of Moringa oleifera leaves used in this experiment would also be insufficient to reduce the proportion of egg yolk. The same is true for shell ratio which was not influenced by Moringa leaves. The anti-nutritional factors such as phytates and oxalates, found in Moringa oleifera leaves, which have a less chelating effect on minerals such as calcium (Foidl et al., 2001), making phosphorus and calcium unavailable could explain these results. Moreover, hens have still the capacity to move calcium from bones compensating feed calcium intake for shell calcification (Wright et al., 1990).

The total serum proteins which include the proteins of the nutritional, immune, enzymatic, and inflammatory state (Tete-Benissan et al., 2013) were low in Moringa oleifera leaves groups compared to the control at 34 weeks of age. At 50 weeks of age, the results showed that total proteins were higher in Moringa oleifera leaves groups. The increase in albumin level at 34 weeks of age with Moringa oleifera leaves would testify to nutritional improvement, especially with increased uric acid and similarity of creatinine. Indeed, uric acid and urea are indicators of an increase in protein catabolism (Donsbough et al., 2010). Thus, the decrease in total proteins at 34 weeks would be related to the decrease in proteins of immunity and inflammation, which, according to Tennant and Center (1997) and Tete-Benissan et al. (2013), would be a consequence of the improvement of animal health.

Results showed that AST and ALT levels were significantly higher in Moringa oleifera leaves treatments at 50 weeks of age. Indeed, the liver, involved in metabolic and detoxification, can present lesions, responsible for an increase in gamma-glutamyltransferase

and transaminases (AST and ALT). These lesions can be caused by infections, diet intoxication, large liver, and poisoning (Nkosi et al., 2005; Mega et al., 2021). Thus, the secondary metabolites of diet or products resulting from their metabolism can cause liver damage, especially with age, that can lead to the release of transaminases (Mega et al., 2021). Thus, the results of this study showed that liver and heart weight were higher in groups fed Moringa oleifera leaves, compared to the control. The results also noted an increase in creatinine levels with Moringa oleifera leaves, at 50 weeks of age, which could also show the effect of these toxins on the kidneys. The nephrons could be damaged by toxins found in Moringa oleifera leaves, such as phenols, especially with prolonged use. This could potentially lead to the accumulation of products like creatinine in the blood (Lauriola et al., 2023). These observations are in agreement with Hetland et al. (2003) results which stipulate that prolonged exposure of oat hulls and wood shaving in broilers and layers diet exacerbates the effect of antinutritional factors. The high levels of AST, ALT, and creatinine could explain the high levels of total protein in groups fed Moringa oleifera leaves at 50 weeks of age.

Concerning serum lipids parameters, the slight decrease in total cholesterol at 34 weeks of age would be linked to the decrease in LDL-cholesterol because of the similarity of HDL-CH levels between groups. The slight reduction in cholesterol levels could be explained by the low level of Moringa oleifera leaves. Indeed, phytosterols and stanols contained in Moringa leaves only compete with cholesterol in the formation of micelles necessary for cholesterol absorption if they are present in sufficient quantity in the gut (Serfaty-Lacrosniere et al., 2001). The significant decrease in triglycerides at 34 weeks of age would be due to the presence of some secondary metabolites such as saponins in Moringa oleifera leaves (Nweze and Nwafor, 2014). Indeed, the use of feed additives relatively rich in saponins reduced serum triglycerides (Afrose et al., 2010). Furthermore, Francis et al. (2002) showed that saponins are known to form insoluble salts with lipids.

The decrease of white blood cells and lymphocytes with Moringa oleifera leaves is in agreement with the results obtained by Voemesse et al. (2019) in laying hens, and could be explain by the antimicrobial properties of Moringa leave (Ahmed et al., 2023). According to Ahamefule et al. (2008), the increase in WBCs is often associated with bacterial infections or the presence of foreign bodies. Authors found that Moringa oleifera leaves reduced gut microflora by inhibiting the growth of

some pathogenic germs such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (Djakalia et al., 2011; Divya et al., 2014; Ahmed et al., 2023), thus causing a reduction in WBC and lymphocytes. This reduction confirms the phyto-therapeutic properties of Moringa oleifera leaves mentioned by Tete-Benissan et al. (2013) and Leone et al. (2015).

Contrary to the decrease in red blood cell and hemoglobin levels with incorporation of M. oleifera leaves at 3% observed by Voemesse et al. (2019) in laying hens, the use of these leaves had no significant influence on RBC in guinea fowl, although a slight decrease in hemoglobin level was observed at 34 weeks of age. This difference would be due to the species of poultry used, which was guinea fowl in this study, and the low level of incorporation of the leaves which was 1.5% in this experiment and 3% in a study of Voemesse et al. (2019).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that the incorporation of Moringa oleifera leaves into local guinea fowl breeders' feed improved growth (1.5% of incorporation) and egg production (0.5% of incorporation), probably by the richness and quality of the nutrients contained in Moringa leaves as shown by improved albumin levels. From the point of view of egg production, the use of 0.5% of Moringa oleifera leaves in the diet should be encouraged. But for growth (23 to 33 weeks of age in this study), egg weight, and egg quality, the best performance is obtained with dietary inclusion of 1% and 1.5% Moringa oleifera leaves. Therefore, the investigation is necessary to explore the hatchability of eggs from guinea fowl breeders fed with a diet containing Moringa oleifera leaves and post-hatch performance.

DECLARATIONS

Authors' contributions

Komi Nukunu Patrik Atitso designed the protocol, performed the experiments, collected and analyzed data, and prepared the original draft, edited it, and finalized the manuscript. Kafui Amivi Tete-Benissan validated the protocol, supervised the data collection, and critically revised the manuscript. Oumbortime N'nanle and Kokou Voemesse validated the protocol and revised the manuscript. Lamboni Lare and Komi Attivi supervised the data collection and revised the manuscript. The authors confirmed the final version of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Funding

The CERSA (Regional Center of Excellence in Poultry Sciences) of the University of Lomé (Togo) supported this study. All authors sincerely acknowledge the World Bank IDA 5424 that was the main sponsor of CERSA.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical considerations

This manuscript does not contain plagiarized sentences and has not been published or accepted for publication elsewhere or under editorial review elsewhere. The data are not fabricated or falsified.

REFERENCES

Abubakar M, Ibrahim U, Yusuf AU, Muhammad AS, and Adamu N (2015). Growth performance, carcass and organ characteristics of growing rabbits fed graded levels of Moringa oleifera leaf meal in diets. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 8(2): 7-9. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v8i2.2

Afrose S, Hossain MS, and Tsujii H (2010). Effect of dietary karaya saponin on serum and egg yolk cholesterol in laying hens. British Poultry Science, 51(6): 797-804. DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.526924

Ahamefule FO, Obua BE, Ukweni IA, Oguike MA, and Amaka RA (2008) Haematological and biochemical profile of weaner rabbits fed raw and rocessed pigeon pea seed meal based diets. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 3: 315-319. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253955869

Ahmed AAA and Lohakare J (2021). Moringa oleifera leaves as Eco-Friendly feed additive in diets of hy-line brown hens during the late laying period. Animals, 11(4): 1116. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ani11041116

Ahmed M, Marrez DA, Abdelmoeen NM, Mahmoud EA, Ali MA, Decsi K, and Toth Z (2023). Proximate analysis of Moringa oleifera leaves and the antimicrobial activities of successive leaf ethanolic and aqueous extracts compared with green chemically synthesized Ag-NPs and crude aqueous extract againts some pathogens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24: 3529. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043529

Ashong JO and Brown DL (2011). Safety and efficacy of Moringa oleifera powder for growing poultry. Journal of Animal Science, 89: 84. Available at: https ://www. jtmtg. org/JAM/2011/abstracts/0082

Attia YA, Abdalah AA, Zeweil HS, Bovera F, Tag El-Din AA, and Araft MA (2010). Effect of inorganic or organic selenium supplementation on productive performance, egg quality and some physiological traits of dual-purpose breeding hens. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 55(11): 505-519. DOI: https://www. doi.org/10.17221/1702-CJAS

Boko KC, Kpodekon TM, Dahouda M, Marlier D, and Mainil JG (2012). Contraintes techniques et sanitaires de la production traditionnelle de pintade en Afrique subsaharienne. Annales de Medecine Veterinaire, 156: 25-36. Available at:

http://www.facmv.ulg.ac.be/amv/article/2012 156 1 02.pdf

Bunchasak C (2009). Role of dietary methionine in poultry production. Journal of Poultry Science, 46(3): 169-179. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.46.169

Divya AB Mandal Biswas AK, and Yadav AS (2014). Effect of dietary Moringa oleifera leaves powder on growth performance, blood chemistry, meat quality and gut microflora of broiler chicks. Animal Nutrition and Feed Tech, 14: 349-357. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.5958/0974-181X.2014.01324.9

Djakalia B, Guichard BL, and Soumaila D (2011). Effect of Moringa oleifera on growth performance and health status of young post-weaning rabbits. Research Journal of Poultry Sciences, 4: 7-13. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3923/rjpscience.2011.7.13

Donsbough AL, Powell S, Waguespack A, Bidner TD, and Southern LL (2010). Uric acid, urea, and ammonia concentrations in serum and uric acid concentration in excreta as indicators of amino acid utilization in diets for broilers. Poultry Science, 89(2): 287-294. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00401

Eftekhari Hasan Abad MR, and Ghaniei A (2023). Effects of Herbal Medicine in the Treatment of Poultry Coccidiosis. Journal of World's Poultry Science, 2(1): 1-7. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.58803/jwps.v2i1.10

El-Tazi SM (2014). Effect of feeding different levels of Moringa oleifera leaf meal on the performance and carcass quality of broiler chicks. International Journal of Science and Research, 3:147-151. Available at: https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i5/MDlwMTMxNzc5

Fadiyimu AA, Alokan JA, and Fajemisin AN (2010). Digestibility, nitrogen balance and haematological profile of West African dwarf sheep fed dietary levels of Moringa oleifera as supplement to Panicum maximum. Journal of American Science, 6(10): 634-643. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228353030

Foidl N, Makkar HPS, and Becker K (2001). The potential of Moringa oleifera for agricultural and industrial uses. In: LJ Fugil (edition). The miracle tree: the multiple attributes of Moringa. CTA Publication, Wageningen, The Netherlands, p. 45-76. Available at: https://www.researchgat.net/publication/310440123

Francis G, Kerem Z, Makkar HPS, and Becker K (2002). The biological action of saponins in animal systems: a review. British Journal of Nutrition, 88 (6): 587-605. DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002725

Francis G, Makkar HPS, and Becker K (2001). Antinutritional factors present in plant-derived alternate fish feed ingredients and their effects in fish. Aquaculture, 199(3-4): 197-227. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00526-9

Giang NT, Dung NT, Anh Khoa DV, Thuy Hang LT, Loan PP, Thi Hue P, and Kim Hoang VT (2023). Moringa leaf powder as natural feed additive on productive performance and egg quality of ISA Brown laying hens. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 35 (2): 2023. Available at: https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd35/2/3515ntgi.html

Gupa KB, Barat GK, Wagle DS, and Chawla HKL (1989). Nutrient contents and antinutritional factors in conventional and non-conventional leafy vegetables. Food Chemistry, 31:105-106. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(89)90021-6

Hetland H, Svihus B, and Krogdahl A (2003). Effect of oat hulls and wood shavings on digestion in broilers and layers fed diets based on whole or ground wheat. British Poultry Science, 44(2): 275-282. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000124595

Hien OC, Boly H, Brillard JP, Diarra B, and Sawadogo L (2002). Effets des mesures prophylactiques sur la productivité de la pintade locale (Numida meleagris) en zone sub-humide du Burkina Faso. Tropicultura, 20 (1) : 23-28. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45266327

Houndonougbo MF, Chrysostome CAAM, and Houndonougbo VP (2012). Performances de ponte et qualité des oeufs des poules pondeuses Isa Brown alimentées avec des rations a base de feuilles séchées de manioc (Manihot esculenta, Crantz). International Journal og Biology and Chemistry Sciences, 6: 1950-1959. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i5.5

Houndonougbo PV, Bindelle J, Chrysostome CAAM, Hammami H, and Gengler N (2017). Characteristics of guinea fowl breeding in West Africa: A review. Tropicultura, 35(3): 222-230. Available at: http://www.tropicultura.org/text/v35n3/222

Ikani E and Dafwang I (2004). The production of guinea fowl in Nigeria. Extension Bulletin No.207. Poultry Series No.8. Available at: http://www.naerls.gov.ng/extmat/bulletins/Guineafowl

Kakengi A, Kaijage J, Sarwatt S, Mutayoba S, Shem M, and Fujihara TJB (2007). Effect of Moringa oleifera leaf meal as a substitute for sunflower seed meal on performance of laying hens in Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19 (8): Article #120. Available at: https://www.lrrd. org/lrrd 19/8/kake 19120 .htm

Kashyap P, Kumar S, Riar SC, Jindal N, Baniwal P, Guiné RPF, Correia PMR, Mehra R, and Kumar H (2022). Recent advances in drumstick (Moringa oleifera) leaves bioactive compounds: composition, health benefits, bioaccessibility and dietary applications. Antioxidants (Basel), 11(2): 402. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020402

Khalid S, Arshad M, Mahmood S, Ahmed W, Siddique F, Khalid W, Zarlasht M, Asar TO, and Faten AM (2023). Nutritional and phytochemical screening of Moringa oleifera leaf powder in aqueous and ethanol extract. International Journal of Food Properties, 26(1): 2338-2348. DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2023.2246685

Koné GA, Kouassi GF, Kouakou NDV, and Kouba M (2018). Diagnostic of guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) farming in Ivory Coast Poultry Science, 97: 4272-4278. DOI:

https://www.doi .org/10.3382/ps/pey290

Konlan SP, Avornyo FK, Karbo N, and Sulleyman A (2011). Increasing guinea fowl eggs availability and hatchability in the dry season. Journal of World's Poulttry Research, 1: 1-3. Available at: https://www.jwpr.science-

line.com/attachments/article/5/JWPR,%20A1,%201-3,%202011

Lauriola M, Farré R, Evenepoel P, Overbeek SA, and Meijers B (2023). Food-Derived Uremic Toxins in Chronic Kidney Disease. Toxins, 15: 116. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/toxins15020116

Leone A, Spada A, Battezzati A, Schiraldi A, Aristil J, and Bertoli S (2015). Cultivation, genetics, ethnopharmacology , phytochemistry and pharmacology of Moringa oleifera leaves: An overview. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16 (6): 12791-12835. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ijms160612791

Lombo Y, Dao BB, and Ekoue KS (2011). Elaboration d'un itineraire technique d'élevage de pintadeaux adapté en élevage familial au Togo. Neuvième Journées de la Recherche Avicole, Tours, 29 et 30 mars 2011. Available at:

https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20113368815

Lombo Y, Tona K and Bonfoh B (2018). Analysis of the technical and sanitary constraints of the traditional breeding of guinea fowl in 'Region des Savanes " of nor them Togo. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 6(1): 77-87. DOI:

https://www.doi .org/10.17265/2328-2150/2018.01.009

Manzo ML, Halidou DM, Hallarou M, Illo A, Rabani A, Donnen P, and Dramaix M (2016). Composition de la poudre des feuilles sèches de Moringa oleifera dans trois regions du Niger. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 16(4): 1684-5374. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.18697/aj fand.76.15115'

Mega A, Marzi L, Kob M, Piccin A, and Floreani A (2021). Food and nutrition in the pathogenesis of lever damage. Nutrients, 13(4): 1326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041326

Mendieta-Araica B, Sporndly E, Reyes-Sânchez N, and Sporndly R (2011). Feeding Moringa oleifera fresh or ensiled to dairy cows effects on milk yield and milk flavor. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43: 1039-1047. DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9803-7

Moyo B, Oyedemi S, Masika PJ, and Muchenje V (2012). Polyphenolic content and antioxidant properties of Moringa oleifera leaf extracts and enzymatic activity of liver from goats supplemented with

Moringa oleifera leaves/sunflower seed cake. Meat Science, 91(4): 441-447. DOI: https://www.doi.Org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.02.029

Musa-Azara, SI, Jibrin M, Hassan DI, and Yakubu A (2014). Effects of Moringa oleifera seed on blood chemistry and reproductive performance of female rabbits. Internationa Journal of Agriculture, Science and Veterinary Medecine, 2: 18-21. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/28271466

N'nanle O, Tété-Bénissan A, Nideou D, Onagbesan OM, and Tona K (2020). Use of Moringa oleifera leaves in broiler production chain. 1 - Effect on Sasso breeder hens performances, internal quality of hatching eggs and serum lipids. Veterinary Medecine and Science, 6: 485-490. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.235

Nahashon SN, Adefope NA, Amenyenu A, and Wright D (2006). Laying performance of Pearl Gray guinea fowl hens as affected by caging density. Poultry Science, 85(9): 1682-1689. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.9.1682

Nkosi CZ, Opoku AR and Terblanche SE (2005). Effect of pumpkin seed (Cucurbita pepo) protein isolate on the activity levels of certain plasma enzymes in CCl4 - induced liver injury in low - protein fed rats. Phytotherapy Research, 19: 341-345. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1685

Ntshambiwa KT, Seifu E, and Mokhawa G (2023). Nutritional composition, bioactive components and antioxidant activity of Moringa stenopetala and Moringa oleifera leaves grown in Gaborone, Botswana. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition, 5 (7) 2023. Available at:

https://fppn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s43014-022-00124-x

Nweze NO and Nwafor FI (2014). Phytochemical, proximate and mineral composition of leaf extracts of Moringa oleifera Lam. from Nsukka, South-Eastern Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 9(1): 99-103. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.9790/3008-091699103

Nyembo CK, Tchoffo H, Chongsi MM, Ciza PA, Amani IM, Tieubou LT, and Kana RJ (2023). Effects of Graded Level of Typha angustifolia Rhizomes on Intestinal Microflora, Immune System, and Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens. Journal of World's Poultry Science, 2(4): 39-46. Available at: https://jwps.rovedar.com/index.php/JWPS/article/view/20

Nys Y, Bain M, and Vanlmmerseel F (2011). Improving the safety and quality of aggs and agg products. Volume 1: Egg chemistry, production and consumption Wooldhead Publishing Series in: Food Science Technology Nutrition, P. 602. Available at: https://www.shop.elsevier.com/books/978-1-84569-754-9

Popkin BM, Adair LS, and Nq SW (2012). Global Nutrition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutrition Reviews, 70(1): 3-4. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x

Radwan N, Hassan RA, Quota EM, and Fayek HM (2008). Effect of natural antioxidant on oxidative stability of eggs and productive and reproductive performance of laying hens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7: 134-150. DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.134.150

Sadr S, Ghafouri SA, Ghaniei A, Jami Moharreri D, Zeinali M, Qaemifar N, Poorjafari Jafroodi P, Hajiannezhad Z, and Atazade AH (2022). Treatment of Avian Trichomoniasis by Tannin-based Herbal mixture (Artemisia Annua, Quercus infectoria, and Allium Sativum). Journal of World's Poultry Science, 1(2): 32-39. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.58803/JWPS.2022.1.2.01

Sanchez NRE, Sporndly E, and Ledin I (2006). Effect of feeding different levels of follage of Moringa oleifera to creole dairy crows on intake, digestibility, milk production and composition. Livestock Science, 101: 24-31. DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.09.010

Sanfo R, Boly H, Sawadogo L, and Brian O (2008). Performances pondérales de la pintade locale (Numida meleagris) en système d'alimentation améliorée dans la zone centrale du Burkina Faso.

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

Revue d'Elevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux, 61(2): 135-140. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.19182/remvt.10000

Santos AFS, Argolo ACC, Paiva PMG, and Coelho LCBB (2012). Antioxidant activity of Moringa oleifera tissue extracts. Phytotherapy Research, 26: 1366-1370. DOI: https://www.doi .org/10.1002/ptr.4591

Sarker SK, Rana M, Khatun H, Faruque S, Sarker NR, Farhana Sharmin F, and Islam N (2017). Moringa leaf meal as natural feed additives on the growth performance and meat quality of commercial broiler chicken. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 3: 240244. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3329/ajmbr.v3i2.33576

Sodjedo C, Pitala W, Laré L and Lombo Y (2022). Effect of the season and the sex ratio on the laying performance and on the reproduction performance of indigenous guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) in South Togo. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 52 (2): 95039511. DOI: https://www.doi. org/10.35759/JAnmPlSci.v52-2.7

Suk YO and Park C (2001). Effect of Breed and Age of Hens on the Yolk to Albumen Ratio in Two Different Genetic Stocks. Research Notes. Poultry Science, 80: 855-858. Available at: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11469645

Sultana N, Alimon AR, Huque KS, Sazili AQ, Yaakub H, Hossain J, and Baba M (2015). The feeding value of Moringa (Moringa oleifera) foliage as replacement to conventional concentrate diet in Bengal goats. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 3: 164-173. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2015/3.3.164.173

Tarmizi AAA, Ramli NNN, Adam SH, Mutalib MA, Mokhtar MH, and Tang SGH (2023). Phytofabrication of selenium nanoparticles with Moringa oleifera (MO-SeNPs) and exploring its antioxidant and antidiabetic potential. Molecules, 28(14): 5322. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145322

Tennant BC and Center SA (1997). Chapter 13 - Hepatic Function, in: Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML, Editors. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, 5th Edition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 327-352. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012396305-5/50014-2

Tété-Bénissan A, Quashie MA, Lawson-Evi K, Gnandi K, Kokou K, and Gbeassor M (2013). Influence of Moringa Oleifera leaves on atherogenic lipids and glycaemia evolution in HIV-infected and uninfected malnourished patients. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 62: 4610-4619. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4314/jab.v62i0.86072

Teteh A, Gbeassor M, Decuypere E, and Tona K (2016). Effects of Moringa oleifera leaf on laying rate, egg quality and blood parameters. International Journal of Poultry Science, 15(7): 277282. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2016

Teteh A, Lawson E, Tona K, Decuypere E, and Gbeassor M (2013). moringa Oleifera Leave: Hydro-Alcoholic Extract and Effects on Growth Performance of Broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 12: 401-405. DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.401.405

Titi M, Harijono K, Teti E, and Endang SW (2013) . Effect lactagogue of Moringa leaves ( Moringa oleifera Lam) powder in rats white female Wistar. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3: 430-434. Available at:

https ://www.textroad.com/pdf/JBASR/J. 202013.pdf

Voemesse K, Teteh A, Nideou D, N'nanle O, Gbeassor M, Decuypere E, and Tona K (2018). Effect of Moringa oleifera leaf meal on growth performance and blood parameters of egg type chicken during juvenile growth. International Journal of Poultry Science, 17: 154159. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2018.154.159

Voemesse K, Teteh A, Nideou D, N'nanle O, Tete-Benissan A, Oke OE, Gbeassor M, Decuypere E, and Tona K (2019). Effects of Moringa oleifera leave meal in the diet on layer performance, haematological and serum biochemical values. European Poultry Science, 83: 1612-9199. DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.1399/eps.2019.263

Wiwit DF, Taslim E, Kuniyoshi S, and Ssi F (2016). Antioxidant Activity of Moringa olifera Extracts. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 16 (3) 297-301. DOI:

https://www.doi.org/10.22146/ijc.21145

Wright D, Ruben C, Schutzs K, Kerje S, Kindmark A, Branstrom H, Aderson L, Pizzari T, and Jensen P (1990). Onset of sexual maturity in female chickens is genetically linked to loci associated with fecundity and a sexual ornament. Reproductive in Domestic Animal, 47: 31-36. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01963.x

Yaman MA, Kita K, and Okumura J (2000). Different responses of protein synthesis to refeeding in various muscles of fasted chicks. British Poultry Science, 41: 224-228. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071660050022317

Yang M, Tao L, Kang XR Wang ZL, Su LY, Li LF, Gu F, Zhao CC, Sheng J, and Tian Y (2023a). Moringa oleifera lam. leaves as new raw food material: A revew of its nutritional composition, functional properties, and comprehensive application. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 138: 399-416. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.05.013

Yang RY, Chang LC, Hsu JC, Weng Brian BC, Palada Manuel C, Chadha ML, and Levasseur V (2006). Nutritional and functional properties of Moringa leaves. -From germplasm to plants, food and health (1-9). In : Moringa and other plants with high nutritional potential: Strategies, standards and markets for a better impact on nutrition in Africa: 16-18 November, Accra (Ghana) p.9. Available at: https://www.worldveg.tind.io/record/34929

Yang SL, Yang RC, Zhou X, Yang SH, Liao FY, Yao BN, Zhu BG, and Pongchan NL (2023b). Effect of dietary supplementation of flavonoids from Moringa leaves on growth and laying performance, immunological and antioxidant activities in laying ducks. Journal of Applied Poultry Reasearch, 32(1): 100318. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2022.100318

Zade V and Dabhadkar D (2014). Antifertility Effect of Alcoholic Extract of Moringa oleifera Stem Bark on Estrous Cycle and Estrogenic Activity of Female Albino Rat. American Journal of Advanced Drug Delivery. 3. 223-235. Available at:

https://www.Arvind-Singh-21/post/01574598862061/download/2.pdf

Zhang H, Huang L, Hu S, Qin X and Wang X (2023). Maringa oleifera leaf powder as new source of protein-based feedstuff improves growth performance and cecal microbial diversity of broiler chichen. Journal of Animals, 13(6): 1104. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ani13061104

Publisher's note: Scienceline Publication Ltd. remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © The Author(s) 2024

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.