Научная статья на тему 'Effectiveness of aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2” against the African swine fever virus'

Effectiveness of aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2” against the African swine fever virus Текст научной статьи по специальности «Ветеринарные науки»

CC BY
371
61
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Журнал
Ukrainian Journal of Ecology
Область наук
Ключевые слова
Disinfectant / African swine fever / Virus / Test objects / Concentration / Exposure

Аннотация научной статьи по ветеринарным наукам, автор научной работы — A.P. Paliy, B.T. Stegniy, A.V. Kuzminov, A.I. Buzun, A.P. Gerilovich

We determined the application pattern of the innovative aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2" against the African swine fever virus (ASFV). Experiments on virucidal activity of the disinfectant were carried out in strict compliance with biosafety requirements for BSL-3 laboratory (State Institution "Ukrainian Research Anti-Plague Institute named after I.I. Mechnikov Ministry of Health of Ukraine"). We found that "DZPT-2" acts virulently on the causative agent of African swine fever at concentration of 0.5-1.0% of active substance at 1-hour exposure and consumption rate of 300-500 ml/m2. The "DZPT-2" shows virucidal properties against the ASFV at temperature up to minus 26-24 assumed that manufacturing of working solutions was made with 20% solution of antifreeze in concentration of 0.5-1.0% of the active substance at exposure of 1 hour and consumption rate of 300-500 ml/m2. Our results were confirmed during the bioassay as the most sensitive method for determining the viability of the pathogen. "DZPT-2" disinfectant can be used in anti-epizootic measures regarding the African swine fever and could effectively prevent and force the disinfection of livestock and veterinary control facilities.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Effectiveness of aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2” against the African swine fever virus»

Ukrainian Journal of Ecology

Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2020, 10(3), 131-138, doi: 10.15421/2020_146

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effectiveness of aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2" against the

African swine fever virus

A.P. Paliy1*, B.T. Stegniy1, A.V. Kuzminov1, A.I. Buzun1, A.P. Gerilovich1, M.V. Bogach2,

M.Y. Stegniy1

1 National Scientific Center "Institute ofExperimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine" 83 Pushkinska St, Kharkiv, 61023, Ukraine 2Odessa Experimental Station National Scientific Center "Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary

Medicine", 2 SvobodyAve, Odessa, 65037, Ukraine

Corresponding author E-mail: paliy. dok@gmail. com

Received: 19.06.2020. Accepted20.07.2020

We determined the application pattern of the innovative aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2" against the African swine fever virus (ASFV). Experiments on virucidal activity of the disinfectant were carried out in strict compliance with biosafety requirements for BSL-3 laboratory (State Institution "Ukrainian Research Anti-Plague Institute named after I.I. Mechnikov Ministry of Health of Ukraine"). We found that "DZPT-2" acts virulently on the causative agent of African swine fever at concentration of 0.5-1.0% of active substance at 1-hour exposure and consumption rate of 300-500 ml/m2. The "DZPT-2" shows virucidal properties against the ASFV at temperature up to minus 26-24 assumed that manufacturing of working solutions was made with 20% solution of antifreeze in concentration of 0.5-1.0% of the active substance at exposure of 1 hour and consumption rate of 300-500 ml/m2. Our results were confirmed during the bioassay as the most sensitive method for determining the viability of the pathogen. "DZPT-2" disinfectant can be used in anti-epizootic measures regarding the African swine fever and could effectively prevent and force the disinfection of livestock and veterinary control facilities.

Keywords: Disinfectant; African swine fever; Virus; Test objects; Concentration; Exposure

Introduction

African swine fever (ASF) is a highly contagious animal disease of great economic and social importance. Over the last decade, the disease has spread to many European and Asian countries and is now one of the main threats to profitable pig farming worldwide (Grau et al., 2015).

Both the clinical signs of the disease and the pathomorphological changes vary significantly depending on the virulence of the pathogen and the immune state of the macroorganism. Thus, infections caused by highly virulent viral isolates lead to a clinical course resembling viral hemorrhagic fever, which is characterized by severe depletion of lymphoid tissues, apoptosis, impaired hemostasis, and immune functions of the body (Blome et al., 2013; Zhaoet al., 2019).

The African continent is permanently unfavorable for ASF, where seropositivity for antibodies against ASF has been detected in domestic pigs without a clinical manifestation of the disease (Patrick et al., 2020). A high proportion of constantly infected animals releases the virus into the environment for at least 70 days, which poses a possible risk of transmission of the disease to a susceptible population (de Carvalho Ferreira et al., 2012). Recovered animals can also be a source of ASFV, which in turn ensures the stationarity of this disease in pig populations (Eblé et al., 2019). Recently, the incidence of ASF has sharply increased in wild boar populations (Guinat et al., 2016). An additional biosafety issue for pig breeding farms is the transmission of the ASF virus (Fila & Wozniakowski, 2020) and some invasions (Paliy et al., 2018a, 2018b) by insects. Outbreaks of African swine fever have been reported in many countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa (Jori et al., 2013), as well as in the Republic of Mauritius (Lubisi et al., 2009), Uganda (Dione et al., 2015), Sinegal (Etter et al., 2011), Nigeria (Fasina et al., 2012).

After an ASF outbreak in Georgia in 2007, the disease spread from Eastern to Western Europe, and then in August 2018 spread to the borders of Mongolia and China (Li & Tian, 2018; Zhao et al., 2019), and today has reached various countries in the Southeast Asia (Sánchez-Cordón et al., 2019).

Among Western countries, the African swine fever virus has spread widely in Belgium (Pikalo et al., 2020), which increases the risk of its spreading to neighboring countries, namely Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and France (Andraud et al., 2019). The first case of ASF in Russia was recorded in 2007, and in 2017, outbreaks of this disease were noted in Siberia (Kolbasov et al., 2018). ASF outbreaks have also been reported in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Ukraine, Belarus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Moldova, the Czech Republic, and Romania (Jurado et al., 2018; Schulz et al., 2019). The threatening situation regarding ASF in Eastern Europe creates a constant risk of this disease occur in safe EU countries, especially through routes that are difficult to control, such as the movement of wild boars, the illegal movement of animals and animal products, as well as the movement of infected vehicles contaminated with the pathogen, etc. (Sánchez-Vizcaíno et al., 2013). There are great risks of the introduction and spread of the ASF virus in the United States (Jurado et al., 2019).

ASF is caused by a large icosahedral, linear, double-stranded DNA virus, which is the only member of the Asfarviridae family, genus Asfivirus. The circulation of the virus is maintained in Africa through a complex transmission cycle involving African wild pigs, soft ticks, and domestic pigs (Galindo & Alonso, 2017; Dixon et al., 2020). The ASF virus can be easily transmitted orally, although higher doses are required for infection through contaminated feed (Niederwerder et al., 2019).

The development of adapted guidelines for managing the biorisk of infectious diseases among pig herds is extremely important for both large pig farms and small private farms (Costard et al., 2009).

Using the most appropriate diagnostic tools is critical in implementing effective ASF control programs (Gallardo et al., 2015). The availability of effective and safe vaccines will also support and ensure the implementation of the ASF eradication strategy (Arias et al., 2017).

Considering that ASF is a highly dangerous vaccine-uncontrolled disease, the disinfection technologies play a leading role in its prevention and control (Zavgorodniy et al., 2013; Paliy et al., 2020; De Lorenzi et al., 2020). In veterinary practice, a wide range of disinfectants are used, namely the aldehydes (Paliy et al., 2018c), chlorines (Paliy, 2014, 2018b), and acidic (Paliy, 2018a; Bondarchuk et al., 2019). However, it should be noted that the current range of disinfectants that can be used in ASF is limited and does not correspond to the challenges and the current epizootic situation.

Our work aimed to determine the application pattern of an innovative disinfectant on a model of the African swine fever virus.

Materials and Methods

Considering the relevance of the problem, the National Scientific Center "Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine" (NSC "IECVM") has developed a new aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2" (Paliy, 2013). Experiments with the infectious active ASF virus in determining the virucidal activity of the disinfectant were carried out with strict adherence to biosafety requirements at the BSL-3 laboratory (the State Institution "Ukrainian I.I. Mechnikov Research Anti-Plague Institute of Ministry of Health of Ukraine"). Determination of the virucidal properties of the disinfectant "DZPT-2" relative to the causative agent of African swine fever was carried out at two temperature conditions: room temperature (25.0 ± 1.0°C) and subzero temperature (minus 25.0 ± 1.0°C). The disinfectant was tested at concentrations of 0.5% and 1.0% of the active ingredient (AI) at exposure of 1, 5 and 24 hours at a consumption rate of 300 and 500 ml/m2.

When carrying out experiments under subzero temperatures (-25.0 ± 1.0°C), working solutions of the disinfectant were prepared in a 20% solution of antifreeze. We used an epizootic isolate of the ASFV "Ternopil-2017", which was isolated from clinical material in 2018 (Stegniy et al., 2018) as a test model for studying the virucidal properties of the drug "DZPT-2" by standard methods (Pikalo et al., 2020).

ASFV isolate "Ternopil-2017" was identified for infectious properties in suckling piglets, as well as for hemadsorption and cytopathic activity, by real-time PCR according to the recommendations of the International Epizootic Bureau (OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (Mammals, Birds and Bees) Chapter 2.8.1 African swine fever (NB: Version adopted in May 2012).

A mixture containing the ASFV and dried pig manure was applied to sterile test objects (wood, ceramic tiles), evenly distributed over the area at the rate of 1.0-1.5 ml per 100 cm2 and dried for 2 hours. The test objects prepared in this way were placed in sterile metal cuvettes in a BSL-3 laminar flow hood. After that, solutions of the disinfectant "DZPT-2" at a concentrations of 0.5% and 1.0% by AI were applied to each experimental test object separately and maintained for a given exposure (1, 5, 24 hours). The experiments were carried out both at room temperature (25.0 ± 1.0°C) and at minus 25.0 ± 1.0°C in a freezer. As a control, we used the test objects that were contaminated with the ASFV and were treated with sterile saline instead of a disinfectant (positive control).

After maintaining a certain exposure, each of the above test objects was washed separately, and the resulting liquid in Eppendorf tubes was centrifuged at 1000 rpm. within 15 minutes. The resulting supernatant was used for virological studies. The final count was carried out according to the results of a biological test on suckling pigs up to 7 days of age, from which analogous tests were formed:

- Analogue test No 1 (application of "DZPT-2" at a concentration of 0.5-1.0% by AI at a temperature of 25.0 ± 1.0°C);

- Analogue test No (application of "DZPT-2" at a concentration of 0.5-1.0% by AI at a temperature of minus 25.0 ± 1.0°C);

- Analogue test No 3 (control test objects at a temperature of 25.0 ± 1.0°C);

- Analogue test No 4 (control test objects at a temperature of minus 25.0 ± 1.0°C);

- Analogue test No 5 (control intact animals).

Observation of infected piglets was carried out every day within five days (until the death or diagnostic slaughter), with the use of clinical examination and thermometry (twice a day), pathomorphological autopsy, setting the hemadsorption test with isolated blood leukocytes, followed by confirmation of the results obtained in real-time PCR.

The presence of drug virucidal activity was considered satisfactory with absence of disease in experimental animals, which were injected with a suspension from test objects treated with a disinfectant, in case of ASF disease in control animals infected with the "Ternopil-2017" isolate. This was based on the results of complex clinical and laboratory diagnostics, including Real-time PCR using the ASF virus DNA detection method developed by the NSC "IECVM" and the State Scientific Research Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics and Veterinary Sanitary Expertise of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine.

We also applied biological load in the form of manure, which is recommended by other researchers (McLaren at al., 2011). Testing of disinfectants must be carried out at different temperature conditions, including subzero temperatures (Jang et al., 2017), which we considered during the experiments. As experimental animals, we used suckling pigs, as the most sensitive to this virus (Zhao et al., 2019).

Results and Discussion

We found that none of the samples of test objects contaminated with the ASF virus and treated with working solutions of the drug "DZPT-2" in the cultures of pig macrophages showed the presence of the ASF virus either in Hemadsorption Inhibition Test, or by cytopathic action, or by PCR results (analogue tests No 1, 2). At the same time, all samples of test objects contaminated with the ASF virus, but not treated with "DZPT-2" in the cultures of pig macrophages, showed the presence of the ASF virus by the sign of

hemadsorption of pig erythrocytes, and the majority (60%) - cytopathic action; also the analogue sample of all positive culture samples was positive for ASF according to the results of real-time PCR.

The final assessment of the virucidal action of the drug "DZPT-2" against the ASF virus was carried out taking into account the bioassay on suckling pigs (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1. Bioassay results of "DZPT-2" virucidal activity at temperature of 24-26°C.

Concentration by AI

0,5%

1,0%

control

control (intact animals)

Exposition, hours

Consumption rate

Test object

Bioassay results

1 wood tile

5 300 ml/m2 wood tile

24 wood tile

1 wood tile

5 500 ml/m2 wood tile

24 wood tile

1 wood tile

5 300 ml/m2 wood tile

24 wood tile

1 wood tile

5 500 ml/m2 wood tile

24 wood tile

1 wood tile

5 — wood tile

24 wood tile

analogue test No 1: negative bioassay

analogue test No 3: positive bioassay

analogue test No 5: negative bioassay

Table 2. Bioassay results of "DZPT-2" virucidal activity at temperature of -26-24°C.

Concentration by AI

0,5%

1,0%

control

control (intact animals)

Exposition, hours

Consumption rate

Test object

Bioassay results

1 wood Tile

5 300 ml/m2 wood Tile

24 wood tile

1 wood tile

5 500 ml/m2 wood tile

24 wood tile

1 wood tile

5 300 ml/m2 wood tile

24 wood tile

1 wood tile

5 500 ml/m2 wood tile

24 wood tile

1 wood tile

5 - wood tile

24 wood tile

analogue test No 2: negative bioassay

analogue test No 4: positive bioassay

analogue test No 5: negative bioassay

When carrying out a bioassay, it was found that piglets (n=2) inoculated with the analogue test No 1 showed a negative result. At the same time, their daily rectal temperature fluctuated within 38.4-39.1°C for the first 40 hours, and then by the end of observation (on the 5th day) it was within 38.2-38.8°C. Clinical and pathomorphological signs of ASF were not recorded, hemadsorption inhibition test with blood leukocytes was negative. Piglets (n=3) inoculated with analogue test No 2 also retained the clinical status characteristic of healthy animals of their age group for 5 days of observation. They did not have any clinical and pathomorphological signs of ASF, and hemadsorption inhibition test with their blood leukocytes was also negative. At the same time, both control bioassays were clearly positive. Thus, a piglet inoculated with the analogue test No 3 showed signs of an acute form of ASF: 40 hours after inoculation, its daily rectal temperature increased from 38.3°C to 40.5°C, which was accompanied by intense thirst and an increase in cyanosis of the skin and hooves (Figure 1)

This animal died 48 hours after infection with the ASF agent. At the same time, at his autopsy, acute splenitis and nephritis were noted, and hemadsorption inhibition test with leukocytes was positive. A pig inoculated with the analogue test No 4 showed signs of a fulminant form of ASF, which was characterized by sudden death of the animal 12 hours after infection. At the same time, the autopsy revealed acute hepatitis and colitis (Figure 2), hemadsorption inhibition test with leukocytes of the dead pig was positive.

Figure 1. Acute form of African swine fever. a) cyanosis of the patch; b) cyanosis of the hooves.

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

ÉSi •

'I

Figure 2. Fulminant form of African swine fever. a) pulmonary edema, acute liver necrosis; b) acute liver necrosis, signs of peritonitis in the direction of inoculum spreading (arrow).

The dynamics of changes in body temperature of experimental and control animals in a comparative aspect is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Dynamics of temperature changes in experimental animals.

Analogue tests 1 and 2 were combined into one pool from which DNA was extracted, which was examined in PCR (in real time format) and a negative result was received. At the same time, PCR with the total DNA of analogue tests 3 and 4 showed the presence of genetic material of the ASF causative agent in them (Figure 4).

Figure 4. PCR-plot of amplification in real time with ASFV F/R primers with reading on the FAM channel: 1) pooled analogs 1 and 2; 2) combined analogue tests 3 and 4; "K +") positive control; "K-") negative control.

Disinfection of livestock facilities is one of the important and key stages in ensuring the epizootic well-being of the livestock sector as a whole (Maertens et al., 2019; Shkromada et al., 2019, 2020; Palii et al., 2020), as well as maintaining high standards of sanitation for processing enterprises (Long et al., 2016; Paliy et al., 2017, 2018d). A whole range of both chemical compounds (Paliy & Dubin, 2016; Luyckx et al., 2017; Stegniy et al., 2019) and physical agents (Rodionova & Paliy, 2016; Zavgorodniy et al., 2019; Rodionova et al., 2020) which differ among themselves not only by efficiency but also have different economic feasibility (Jang et al., 2017) is used for disinfection. The role of disinfection is difficult to overestimate not only in the context of the prevention and control of infectious diseases but also during its implementation to disinfect livestock objects from exogenous forms of helminths (Paliy et al., 2019). Manufacturers of disinfectants offer a number of brands of anti-microbial agents, however, it should be noted that not in all cases an expert assessment of their toxic and biocidal properties is carried out. Most of the drugs have a very narrow range of bactericidal and virucidal properties, and also do not have fungicidal, disinvasive, and antituberculosis effects. It should also be noted the problem of the formation of resistance of microorganisms not only to antibiotics (Davies & Wales, 2019; Hadzevych et al., 2019) but also to frequently used disinfectants (Davin-Regli & Pages, 2012; Espigares et al., 2017; Maertens et al., 2019). However, the correct use of disinfectants in animal husbandry does not lead to reduced sensitivity of epizootic isolates (Maertens et al., 2020). The use of disinfectants in the general antiepizootic complex must also be weighed against any environmental consequences and risks (Bruins & Dyer, 1995). The development of complex sanitation tools for agriculture remains a topical issue of modern disinfectology (Gosling et al., 2017; Liberti et al., 2020).

The developed and registered disinfectant "DZPT-2" (Paliy, 2013) has some properties that distinguish it favorably from existing analogs. The drug contains glutaraldehyde as an active ingredient, which is widely used in disinfection practice (Gorman et al., 1980; Gosling et al., 2017). The conducted experiments established the presence of tuberculocidal properties in "DZPT-2" at concentration of 2.0% by AI after exposure for 5 hours (Paliy et al., 2015); the virucidal properties were revealed at concentration of 0.5% by AI (Newcastle disease virus) and 1.0% by AI (causative agent of viral diarrhea in cattle) after exposure for 30 minutes (Paliy et al., 2016). The use of certain disinfectants in the eradication of ASF requires confirmation of the presence of biocidal properties of drugs in relation to the causative agent of this disease, which determined the purpose of our research. Thus, the effectiveness against ASF virus of chemical disinfectants containing sodium hypochlorite and potassium peroxymonosulfate (Juszkiewicz et al., 2019a), as well as 1.0% formaldehyde solution, 2.0% sodium hydroxide, 1.0% sodium hydroxide, phenols, glutaraldehyde, chemical compounds based on lipid solvents (Juszkiewicz et al., 2019b), organic acids (Krug et al., 2012), iodine (De Lorenzi et al., 2020) was proved. Some commercial disinfectants (Gabbert et al., 2020), as well as physical disinfectants (Kalmar et al., 2018) have been found to have virucidal properties against the ASF virus. Due to the fact that different surfaces can be cleaned and disinfected in different ways (Mannion et al., 2007; Bock et al., 2018), we used wood and ceramic tiles in our experiments. At the same time, we received the same result of the disinfecting effectiveness of the disinfectant. Howard et al. (2015), who argued that the effectiveness of different disinfectants does not differ significantly on concrete, rubber and polycarbonate surfaces, obtained the same effect.

Conclusion

We found that aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2" had a virucidal effect on the causative agent of African swine fever in concentration of 0.5-1.0% by active ingredient with exposure of 1 hour and a consumption rate of 300-500 ml/m2. The disinfectant "DZPT-2" exhibits virucidal properties against the ASFV at negative temperatures (up to - 26-24°C), assumed that disinfectant working solutions were made in 20% solution of antifreeze and used in concentration of 0.5-1,0% by the active ingredient with 1-hour exposure and consumption rate of 300-500 ml/m2.

Disinfectant "DZPT-2" can be used in antiepizootic measures for ASF to effectively prevent and force the disinfection of livestock facilities and veterinary control objects.

References

Andraud, M., Halasa, T., Boklund, A., & Rose, N. (2019). Threat to the French Swine Industry of African Swine Fever: Surveillance, Spread, and Control Perspectives. Frontiers in veterinary science, 6, 248. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00248

Arias, M., de la Torre, A., Dixon, L., Gallardo, C., Jori, F.,... Sanchez-Vizcaino, J.-M. (2017). Approaches and Perspectives for Development of African Swine Fever Virus Vaccines. Vaccines, 5 (35). doi: 10.3390/vaccines5040035

Blome, S., Gabriel, C., & Beer, M. (2013). Pathogenesis of African swine fever in domestic pigs and European wild boar. Virus research, 173(1), 122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.026

Bock, L. J., Hind, C. K., Sutton, J.M., & Wand, M.E. (2018). Growth media and assay plate material can impact on the effectiveness of cationic biocides and antibiotics against different bacterial species. Letters in applied microbiology, 66(5), 368-377. doi: 10.1111/lam.12863

Bondarchuk, A.O., Paliy, A.P., & Blazheyevskiy, M.Ye. (2019). Determination of acute toxicity of the "Bondarmin" disinfectant. Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety, 5(2), 26-30. doi: 10.36016/JVMBBS-2019-5-2-5 Bruins, G., & Dyer, J. A. (1995). Environmental considerations of disinfectants used in agriculture. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 14(1), 81-94. doi: 10.20506/rst.14.1.826.

Costard, S., Porphyre, V., Messad, S., Rakotondrahanta, S., Vidon, H., Roger, F., & Pfeiffer, D. U. (2009). Multivariate analysis of management and biosecurity practices in smallholder pig farms in Madagascar. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 92 (3), 199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.08.010

Davies, R., & Wales, A. (2019). Antimicrobial Resistance on Farms: A Review Including Biosecurity and the Potential Role of Disinfectants in Resistance Selection. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 18(3), 753-774. doi: 10.1111/15414337.12438

Davin-Regli, A., & Pages, J. M. (2012). Cross-resistance between biocides and antimicrobials: an emerging question. Revue scientifique et technique, 31(1), 89-104.

de Carvalho Ferreira, H.C., Weesendorp, E., Elbers, A. R. W., Bouma, A., Quak, S., Stegeman, J.A., & Loeffen, W. L. A. (2012). African swine fever virus excretion patterns in persistently infected animals: A quantitative approach. Veterinary Microbiology, 160(3-4), 327-340. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.06.025

De Lorenzi, G., Borella, L., Alborali, G. L., Prodanov-Radulovic, J., Stukelj, M., & Bellini, S. (2020). African swine fever: A review of cleaning and disinfection procedures in commercial pig holdings. Research in Veterinary Science, 132, 262-267. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.06.009

Dione, M.M., Akol, J., Roesel, K., Kungu, J., Ouma, E.A., Wieland, B., & Pezo, D. (2015). Risk factors for african swine fever in smallholder pig production systems in Uganda. Transboundary and emerging diseases, 64 (3), 872-882. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12452 Dixon, L.K., Stahl, K., Jori, F., Vial, L., & Pfeiffer, D. U. (2020). African Swine Fever Epidemiology and Control. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 8, 221-246. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083741

Eblé, P.L., Hagenaars, T. J., Weesendorp, E., Quak, S., Moonen-Leusen, H.W., & Loeffen, W. L. A. (2019). Transmission of African Swine Fever Virus via carrier (survivor) pigs does occur. Veterinary Microbiology, 237, 108345. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.06.018 Espigares, E., Moreno Roldan, E., Espigares, M., Abreu, R., Castro, B., Dib, A.L., & Arias, Á. (2017). Phenotypic Resistance to Disinfectants and Antibiotics in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Pigs. Zoonoses and public health, 64 (4), 272-280. doi: 10.1111/zph.12308

Etter, E.M.C., Seck, I., Grosbois, V., Jori, F., Blanco, E.,... Roger, F.L. (2011). Seroprevalence of African swine fever in Senegal, 2006. Emerging infectious diseases, 17 (1), 49-54. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.100896

Fasina, F.O., Agbaje, M., Ajani, F.L., Talabi, O.A., Lazarus, D.D.,... Bastos, A.D.S. (2012). Risk factors for farm-level African swine fever infection in major pig-producing areas in Nigeria, 1997-2011. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 107 (1-2), 65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.05.011

Fila, M., & Wozniakowski, G. (2020). African swine fever virus - the possible role of flies and other insects in virus transmission. Journal of Veterinary Research, 64 (1), 1-7. doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2020-0001

Gabbert, L.R., Neilan, J.G., & Rasmussen, M. (2020). Recovery and chemical disinfection of foot- and- mouth disease and African

swine fever viruses from porous concrete surfaces. Journal of Applied Microbiology. doi:10.1111/jam.14694

Galindo, I., & Alonso, C. (2017). African swine fever virus: a review. Viruses, 9:103. doi: 10.3390/v9050103

Gallardo, C., Nieto, R., Soler, A., Pelayo, V., Fernández-Pinero, J., Markowska-Daniel, I., Pridotkas, G., Nurmoja, I., Granta, R.,

Simón, A., Pérez, C., Martín, E., Fernández-Pacheco, P., & Arias, M. (2015). Assessment of African swine fever diagnostic techniques

as a response to the epidemic outbreaks in eastern European Union countries: how to improve surveillance and control programs.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 53 (8), 2555-2565. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00857-15

Gorman, S.P., Scott, E.M., & Russell, A.D. (1980). Antimicrobial activity, uses and mechanism of action of glutaraldehyde. The Journal of applied bacteriology, 48 (2), 161-190. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1980.tb01217.x

Gosling, R.J., Mawhinney, I., Vaughan, K., Davies, R.H., & Smith, R.P. (2017). Efficacy of disinfectants and detergents intended for a pig farm environment where Salmonella is present. Veterinary Microbiology, 204, 46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.004 Grau, F.R., Schroeder, M.E., Mulhern, E.L., Mc Intosh, M.T., & Bounpheng, M. A. (2015). Detection of African swine fever, classical swine fever, and foot-and-mouth disease viruses in swine oral fluids by multiplex reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction. Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation, 27 (2), 140-149. doi: 10.1177/1040638715574768

Guinat, C., Gogin, A., Blome, S., Keil, G., Pollin, R., Pfeiffer, D.U., & Dixon, L. (2016) Transmission routes of African swine fever virus to domestic pigs: current knowledge and future research directions. Veterinary Record, 178, 262-267. doi: 10.1136/vr.103593 Hadzevych, O.V., Paliy, A.P., Kinash, O.V., Petrov, R.V., & Paliy, A.P. (2019). Antibiotic resistance of microorganisms isolated from milk. World of Medicine and Biology, 3 (69), 245-250. doi: 10.26724/2079-8334-2019-3-69-245-250

Howard, R.J., Harding, M.W., Daniels, G.C., Mobbs, S.L., Lisowski, S.L.I., & De Boer, S.H. (2015). Efficacy of agricultural disinfectants on biofilms of the bacterial ring rot pathogen, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 37 (3), 273-284. doi: 10.1080/07060661.2015.1078413

Jang, Y., Lee, K., Yun, S., Lee, M., Song, J., Chang, B., & Choe, N.H. (2017). Efficacy evaluation of commercial disinfectants by using Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium as a test organism. Journal of Veterinary Science, 18 (2), 209-216. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2017.18.2.209

Jori, F., Vial, L., Penrith, M. L., Pérez-Sánchez, R., Etter, E.,..Roger, F. (2013). Review of the sylvatic cycle of African swine fever in

sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian Ocean. Virus Research, 173 (1), 212-227. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.005

Jurado, C., Martínez-Avilés, M., de La Torre, A., Stukelj, M., de Carvalho Ferreira, H.C., ... Bellini, S. (2018). Relevant Measures to

Prevent the Spread of African Swine Fever in the European Union Domestic Pig Sector. Frontiers in veterinary science, 5:77. doi:

10.3389/fvets.2018.00077

Jurado, C., Mur, L., Pérez Aguirreburualde, M. S., Cadenas-Fernández, E., Martínez-López, B., Sánchez-Vizcaíno, J. M., & Perez, A. (2019). Risk of African swine fever virus introduction into the United States through smuggling of pork in air passenger luggage. Scientific Reports, 9 (1):14423. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50403-w

Juszkiewicz, M., Walczak, M., Mazur-Panasiuk, N., & Wozniakowski, G. (2019a). Virucidal effect of chosen disinfectants against African swine fever virus (ASFV) - preliminary studies. Polish journal of veterinary sciences, 22 (4), 777-780. doi: 10.24425/pjvs.2019.131407

Juszkiewicz, M., Walczak, M., & Wozniakowski, G. (2019b). Characteristics of Selected Active Substances used in Disinfectants and their Virucidal Activity Against ASFV. Journal of veterinary research, 63 (1), 17-25. doi:10.2478/jvetres-2019-0006 Kalmar, I.D., Cay, A. B., & Tignon, M. (2018). Sensitivity of African swine fever virus (ASFV) to heat, alkalinity and peroxide treatment in presence or absence of porcine plasma. Veterinary microbiology, 219, 144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.04.025 Kolbasov, D., Titov, I., Tsybanov, S., Gogin, A., & Malogolovkin, A. (2018). African swine fever virus, Siberia, Russia, 2017. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 24 (4), 796-798. doi: 10.3201/eid2404.171238

Krug, P.W., Larson, C.R., Eslami, A.C., & Rodriguez, L.L. (2012). Disinfection of foot-and-mouth disease and African swine fever viruses with citric acid and sodium hypochlorite on birch wood carriers. Veterinary microbiology, 156 (1-2), 96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.10.032

Liberti, L., Lopez, A., Notarnicola, M., Barnea, N., Pedahzur, R., & Fattal, B. (2020). Comparison of advanced disinfecting methods

for municipal wastewater reuse in agriculture. Water Science & Technology, 42 (1-2), 215-220. doi: 10.2166/wst.2000.0316

Li, X., & Tian, K. (2018). African swine fever in China. The Veterinary Record, 183, 300-301. doi: 10.1136/vr.k3774

Long, M., Lai, H., Deng, W., Zhou, K., Li, B.,..Zou, L.J. (2016). Disinfectant susceptibility of different Salmonella serotypes isolated

from chicken and egg production chains. Journal of applied microbiology, 121 (3), 672-681. doi: 10.1111/jam.13184

Lubisi, B.A., Dwarka, R.M., Meenowa, D., & Jaumally, R. (2009). An investigation into the first outbreak of African swine fever in the

Republic of Mauritius. Transboundary and emerging diseases, 56 (5), 178-188. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2009.01078.x

Luyckx, K., Van Coillie, E., Dewulf, J., Van Weyenberg, S., Herman, L.,.. De Reu, K. (2017). Identification and biocide susceptibility

of dominant bacteria after cleaning and disinfection of broiler houses. Poultry science, 96 (4), 938-949. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew355

Maertens, H., De Reu, K., Meyer, E., Van Coillie, E., & Dewulf, J. (2019). Limited association between disinfectant use and either

antibiotic or disinfectant susceptibility of Escherichia coli in both poultry and pig husbandry. BMC Veterinary Research, 15 (1):310.

doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2044-0

Maertens, H., Van Coillie, E., Millet, S., Van Weyenberg, S., Sleeckx, N., Meyer, E., Zoons, J., Dewulf, J. & De Reu, K. (2020). Repeated disinfectant use in broiler houses and pig nursery units does not affect disinfectant and antibiotic susceptibility in Escherichia coli field isolates. BMC Veterinary Research, 16, 140. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02342-2

Mannion, C., Leonard, F.C., Lynch, P. B., & Egan, J. (2007). Efficacy of cleaning and disinfection on pig farms in Ireland. Veterinary Record, 161 (11), 371-375. doi: 10.1136/vr.161.11.371

McLaren, I., Wales, A., Breslin, M., & Davies, R. (2011). Evaluation of commonly-used farm disinfectants in wet and dry models of Salmonella farm contamination. Avian Pathology, 40 (1), 33-42. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2010.537303

Niederwerder, M. C., Stoian, A., Rowland, R., Dritz, S. S., Petrovan, V.,... Hefley, T. J. (2019). Infectious Dose of African Swine Fever Virus When Consumed Naturally in Liquid or Feed. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 25 (5), 891-897. doi: 10.3201/eid2505.181495

Palii, A.P., Paliy, A.P., Rodionova, K.O., Zolotaryova, S. A., Kushch, L. L., ... Umrihina, O. S. (2020). Microbial contamination of cow's milk and operator hygiene. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10 (2), 392-397. doi: 10.15421/2020_113

Paliy, A. (2014). Determination of specific stability Mycobacterium to chlorine containing disinfectant preparation. Bulletin of National Agrarian University of Armenia, 2, 84-86.

Paliy, A., & Dubin, R. (2016). Study of species resistance to some disinfectants in atypical mycobacterium. Bulletin of National Agrarian University of Armenia, 2 (54), 25-27.

Paliy, A.P. (2018a). Antibacterial effect of "Ecocide C" disinfectant against mycobacteria. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8 (1), 141147. doi: 10.15421/2018_198

Paliy, A.P. (2018b). Differential sensitivity of mycobacterium to chlorine disinfectants. Mikrobiolohichnyi Zhurnal, 80 (2), 104-116. doi: 10.15407/microbiolj80.02.104

Paliy, A.P. (2013). Epizootological monitoring of bovine tuberculosis and scientific-experimental substantiation of the development and application of disinfectants. Manuscript. Kharkiv: NSC «IECVM», 318. (in Ukrainian)

Paliy, A.P., Ishchenko, K. V., Marchenko, M. V., Paliy, A.P., & Dubin, R. A. (2018c). Effectiveness of aldehyde disinfectant against the causative agents of tuberculosis in domestic animals and birds. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8 (1), 845-850. doi: 10.15421/2018_283

Paliy, A.P., Rodionova, K.O., Braginec, M.V., Paliy, A.P., & Nalivayko, L.I. (2018d). Sanitary-hygienic evaluation of meat processing enterprises productions and their sanation. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8 (2), 81-88. doi: 10.15421/2018_313 Paliy, A.P., Rodionova, K. O., & Paliy, A. P. (2017). Contamination of animals and poultry meat and means of its reduction. Food Science and Technology, 11 (4), 64-71. doi: 10.15673/fst.v11i4.732

Paliy, A.P., Stegniy, B.T., Muzyka, D.V., Gerilovych, A.P., & Korneykov, O.M. (2016). The study of the properties of the novel virucidal disinfectant. Agricultural Science and Practice, 3 (3), 41-47. doi: 10.15407/agrisp3.03.041

Paliy, A.P., Sumakova, N. V., Mashkey, A. M., Petrov, R. V., Paliy, A. P., & Ishchenko, K. V. (2018b). Contamination of animal-keeping premises with eggs of parasitic worms. Biosystems Diversity, 26 (4), 327-333. doi: 10.15421/011849 Paliy, A.P., Sumakova, N.V., Paliy, A.P., & Ishchenko, K. V. (2018a). Biological control of house fly. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8 (2), 230-234. doi:10.15421/2018_332

Paliy, A.P., Zavgorodniy, A.I., Stegniy, B.T., & Gerilovych, A.P. (2015). A study of the efficiency of modern domestic disinfectants in the system of TB control activities. Agricultural Science and Practice, 2 (2), 26-31. doi: 10.15407/agrisp2.02.026 Paliy, A.P., Zavgorodniy, A. I., Stegniy, B. T., & Palii, A. P. (2020). Scientific and methodological grounds for controlling the development and use of disinfectants. Kharkiv: Miskdruk (in Ukrainian)

Paliy, A., Sumakova, N., Petrov, R., Shkromada, O., Ulko, L., & Palii, A. (2019). Contamination of urbanized territories with eggs of helmiths of animals. Biosystems Diversity, 27 (2), 118-124. doi: 10.15421/011916

Patrick, B.N., Machuka, E.M., Githae, D., Banswe, G., Pelle, R. (2020). Evidence for the presence of African swine fever virus in apparently healthy pigs in South-Kivu Province of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Veterinary Microbiology, 240, 108521. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108521

Pikalo, J., Schoder, M-E., Sehl, J., Breithaupt, A., Tignon, M., Cay, A. B., Gager, A. M., Fischer, M., Beer, M., & Blome, S. (2020). The African swine fever virus isolate Belgium 2018/1 shows high virulence in European wild boar. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 2020;00, 1-6. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13503

Rodionova, K.O., Paliy, A.P., Palii, A.P., Yatsenko, I.V., Fotina, T.I.,... Odyntsova, T.A. (2020). Effect of ultraviolet irradiation on beef carcass yield. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10 (2), 410-415. doi: 10.15421/2020_118

Rodionova, K.O., & Paliy, A.P. (2016). The effectiveness of application ultraviolet radiation for the sanitation of production premises of meat processing enterprises. Veterinary medicine, biotechnology and biosafety, 2 (4), 20-24.

Sánchez- Cordón, P. J., Nunez, A., Neimanis, A., Wikstrom- Lassa, E., Montoya, M., Crooke, H., & Gavier- Widen, D. (2019). African Swine Fever: Disease Dynamics in Wild Boar Experimentally Infected with ASFV Isolates Belonging to Genotype I and II. Viruses, 11 (9), 852. doi: 10.3390/v11090852

Sánchez-Vizcaíno, J. M., Mur, L., & Martínez-López, B. (2013). African swine fever (ASF): Five years around Europe. Veterinary Microbiology, 165 (1-2), 45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.11.030

Schulz, K., Ojsevskis, E., Staubach, C., Lamberga, K., Serzants, M.,... Sauter-Louis, C. (2019). Epidemiological evaluation of Latvian control measures for African swine fever in wild boar on the basis of surveillance data. Scientific Reports, 9:4189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40962-3

Shkromada, O., Paliy, A., Yurchenko, O., Khobot, N., Pikhtirova, A., .Paliy, A. (2020). Influence of fine additives and surfactants on the strength and permeability degree of concrete. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 2, 19-29. doi: 10.21303/24614262.2020.001178

Shkromada, O., Skliar, O., Paliy, A., Ulko, L., Gerun, I.,. Paliy, A. (2019). Development of measures to improve milk quality and safety during production. Eastern-European Journal of enterprise technologies, 3/11 (99), 30-39. doi: 10.15587/17294061.2019.168762

Stegniy, B.T., Buzun, A.I., Yegorova, O.O., Shytikova, L.I., Bohach, M.V.,... Kuzminov, A.V. (2018). Isolation of African swine fever field virus. Veterinary medicine: inter-departmental subject scientific collection, 104, 77-80. (in Ukrainian)

Stegniy, B.T., Paliy, A.P., Pavlichenko, O.V., Muzyka, D.V., Tkachenko, S.V., & Usova, L.P. (2019). Virucidal properties of innovative disinfectant to Avian influenza virus and Newcastle disease virus. Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety, 5 (3), 27-33. doi: 10.36016/JVMBBS-2019-5-3-6

Zavgorodniy, A.I., Paliy, A.P., Stegniy, B. T., & Gorbatenko, S.K. (2019). Infrared milk pasterizer as a component of success in the animal leukemia control. Journal for Veterinary Medicine, Biotechnology and Biosafety, 5 (3), 5-9. doi: 10.36016/JVMBBS-2019-5-3-1.

Zavgorodniy, A.I., Stegniy, B.T., Paliy, A.P., Gorjeev, V.M., & Smirnov, A.M. (2013). Scientific and practical aspects of disinfection in veterinary medicine. Kharkiv: FOP Brovin O.V. (in Ukrainian)

Zhao, D., Liu, R., Zhang, X., Li, F., Wang, J.,. Bu, Z. (2019). Replication and virulence in pigs of the first African swine fever virus isolated in China. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 8 (1), 438-447. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1590128

Citation:

Paliy, A.P., Stegniy, B.T., Kuzminov, A.V., Buzun, A.I., Gerilovich, A.P., Bogach, M.V., Stegniy, M.Y. (2020). Effectiveness of aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2" against the African swine fever virus. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(3), 131-138.

| («QE^^MI jhis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. License

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.