CC BY
58
Ukrainian Journal of Ecology
Ukrainian Journal ofEcology, 2020, 10(4), 175-183, doi: 10.15421/2020_185
ORIGINAL ARTICLE UDC619:576.895.1:631.311.86
Disinvasive action of aldehyde and chlorine disinfectants on the
test-culture of Toxocara can is eggs
A.P. Paliy1, N.V. Sumakova1, K.O. Rodionova2, L.I. Nalivayko3, V.S. Boyko3, T.M. Ihnatieva4, O.Ye. Zhigalova4, T.V. Dudus5, M.V. Anforova2, M.V. Kazakov3
1 National Scientific Center "Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine",
83 Pushkinska St, Kharkiv, 61023, Ukraine 2Odessa state agrarian university, 13 Panteleimonovskaya Str., Odessa, 65012, Ukraine 3Luhansk National Agrarian University, 68 Slobojanska St, Starobilsk, Luhansk region, 92703, Ukraine 4 Kharkiv State Zooveterinary Academy, 1 Akademicheskaya St, urban settlement Malaya Danilivka,
Dergachivsky district, Kharkov region, 62341, Ukraine 5State Institution "Scientific and Methodological Center for Higher and Pre-Higher Education",
11 Smilyanskaya St, Kiev, 09117, Ukraine Corresponding author E-mail: paliy. dok@gmail. com Received: 18.08.2020. Accepted20.09.2020
Disinfection of environmental objects with highly effective disinfectants is a reliable and effective means of preventing the occurrence of outbreaks of infectious and parasitic diseases. The purpose of our work was to determine the disinfection properties of modern disinfectants based on the test culture of Toxocara canis helminths and to establish the optimal modes of their use. It has been proven that an aldehyde disinfectant containing didecyldimethylammonium chloride (2.25%), benzalkonium chloride (8.0%), glutaraldehyde (15.0%), phosphoric acid, nonionic surfactants, water exhibits disinvasive activity against test cultures of Toxocara canis eggs at a concentration of 2.0-4.0% at a temperature of 20±0.5°C and an exposure of 324 hours, and the ovocidal efficiency is from 90.60% to 99.70%. Aldehyde disinfectant can be used for disinfection of soil (black earth, sandy loam, loamy) contaminated with Toxocara canis eggs, at a concentration of 4.0% at 6:00 exposure and a consumption rate of 3000 cm3/m2. Chlorine agent, contains dichlorantin, dimethylhydantoin (12.4-16.4%), dispersant (9.0-12%), nonionic surfactants, corrosion inhibitor, filler exhibits disinvasive activity against Toxocara canis test culture in a concentration of 3.0-4.0% with an exposure of 3-24 hours, and the ovocidal efficiency in this case ranges from 97.40% to 98.82%. The chlorine agent is effective for soil disinfection only at a depth of up to 2 cm at a concentration of 4.0% at a consumption rate of 1000 cm3/m2 and an exposure time of 24 hours.
Keywords: disinfectant, disinfection, eggs Toxocara canis, concentration, exposure, test-object, soil.
Introduction
Parasitic diseases of agricultural and domestic animals are still an urgent problem in veterinary medicine, the solution of which requires a comprehensive, scientifically grounded, innovative approach (Abou-El-Naga, 2018; Paliy et al., 2018a). The most widespread helminths among domestic animals are nematodes Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati et the dog and feline, respectively (Dalimi et al., 2006; Sudhakar et al., 2013). The eggs of these parasites are common environmental pollutants (Paliy et al., 2019), largely due to the fact that many species of dogs and cats serve as pets, others are wild on city streets. Helminth eggs in the feces of dogs and cats become infectious within a few weeks after they enter the environment (sandpit, city parks, public beaches, etc.) (Despommier, 2003; Papavasilopoulos et al., 2018). With an increase in the population of dogs and cats, soil contamination with toxocara eggs can be detected in public places - city yards, playgrounds, etc., regardless of the season (Sommerfelt et al., 2006; Thomas & Jeyathilakan, 2014). Thus, in the study of 152 samples of dog feces, thirteen were positive, infested with helminth eggs, including T. canisand T. leonina (Tarsitano et al., 2010). T. canis eggs were found in high numbers in most soil samples collected from dog centers (Dunsmore et al., 1984). Along with this, it was found that under the conditions of the canine center, the source of environmental pollution by exogenous forms of helminths T. can/sis the fly Musca domestica L. (Paliy et al., 2018b). 26% of sand samples contaminated with T. canis helminths were identified (Ristic et al., 2020). Soil contamination with toxocar eggs is higher in urban than in rural areas. It has also been found that it is the same in spring and autumn (Mizgajska-Wiktor & Jarosz, 2007). Thus, soil contaminated with exogenous forms of helminths plays a leading role in the preservation and spread of invasions among susceptible animals (Rosa Xavier et al., 2010; Mizgajska-Wiktor et al., 2017).
Toxocara canislarvae survive in water at temperatures between 15 and 35°C, helminth eggs survive cooling down to 1 and -2°C for 6 weeks and can develop to the invasive stage (Azam et al., 2011). A temperature of 12-37°C provides the best conditions for infection with human and animal helminth eggs (Raissi et al., 2019). The development of helminth eggs in the environment is considered as a potential threat to public health, and the precise definition of the stages of development and a clear differentiation of viable and non-viable eggs can be used in the study of antiparasitic compounds (Abou-El-Naga, 2018). Toxocariasis is a dangerous parasitic zoonosis that affects millions of children and adolescents around the world (Chen et al, 2018). Infected humans are potential sources of invasion for definitive hosts (carnivores) or other humans (Strube et al., 2013). The spread of helminth eggs in the environment is facilitated by the synanthropic bird (Rahbar et al, 2015). Important in the spreading of eggs Toxocara spp. have earthworms (Mizgajska, 2001). Musca domestica L. plays the leading role in the transmission of exogenous forms of helminths (Paliy et al., 2018c).
The clinical manifestation of toxocariasis in humans ranges from asymptomatic to severe infection with organ trauma caused by the migration of parasite larvae (Nicoletti, 2013). Today, toxocariasis is a serious environmental problem in large cities and towns (Raissi et al., 2019).
Human toxocariasis remains a threat, despite the availability of highly effective anthelmintics for dogs and cats. Effective prevention strategies require a good understanding of the biology and epidemiology of these parasites and the risk factors that lead to their transmission to humans (Overgaauw & van Knapen, 2013). In this regard, complex veterinary and sanitary measures aimed at the destruction of exogenous forms of helminths in the environment using highly effective disinfectants are of paramount importance (Paliy et al., 2020c).
The purpose of our work was to determine the disinfection properties of modern disinfectants on a test culture of Toxocara canishelminths and to establish the optimal modes of their use.
Materials and methods
Experimental studies were carried out in the laboratory of veterinary sanitation at parasitology of the National Scientific Center "Institute of Experimental and Clinical Veterinary Medicine" (Kharkiv) according to the guidelines "Testing and application of disinvasive drugs in veterinary medicine" (2010) and other techniques (Melnichuk & Yuskiv, 2018). The following agents from various chemical groups were used as disinfectants:
Agent No. 1 (aldehyde) - didecyldimethylammonium chloride (2.25%), benzalkonium chloride (8.0%), glutaraldehyde (15.0%), phosphoric acid, nonionic surfactants (surfactants) and water. The product is a clear, light yellow liquid with a specific odor. Agent No. 2 (chlorine) - dichlorantin, dimethylhydantoin (12.4-16.4%), dispersant (9.0-12%), nonionic surfactants, corrosion inhibitor, filler. Chlorine is at least 14.0%. The product is in powder form.
Toxocara canis culture was obtained using the feces of dogs, in which at least 2-3 specimens of helminth eggs were found by the flotation method in the field of view of a microscope at low magnification (Verocai et al., 2010).
The resulting helminth eggs were thoroughly mixed with saline until a homogeneous suspension was obtained, and some were sent to the refrigerator for storage at a temperature of 3.0±0.5°C, and the other part was cultivated at a temperature of 26.0-28.0±0.5°C for 20 30 days, with daily aeration at room temperature for one hour. The viability of helminth cultures was monitored by microscopy methods according to the degree of protoplast cleavage and staining according to Maretskiy A.Ya. (1954) and (Ubhayawardana, 2018). The culture of helminth eggs was prepared in advance in a large volume for use both in the experiment and in the control.
Before testing disinfectants, an aqueous emulsion of helminth eggs in the amount of 300-600 specimens was placed in Petri dishes or on watch glasses. Excess water was removed with filter paper strips. After that, working solutions of disinfectants in appropriate concentrations were separately added to the eggs of helminths at an exposure time of 1 to 72 hours. Working solutions of disinfectants were prepared immediately before use and tested under laboratory conditions at room temperature. In the control, up to a Petri dish or on watch glasses with a culture of helminth eggs, instead of working solutions of disinfectants, a sterile isotonic solution was added. After that, the washed T. canis eggs were cultivated in a thermostat at a temperature of 26-28±0.5°C for 28 days with daily aeration for 1:00. At the same time, antimicrobial drugs were added every 23 days to prevent the development of molds and protozoa, which can affect the viability of eggs. The absence of development of T. canis eggs in the test samples, in the presence of development in the control culture, was a sign, respectively, of the presence or absence of disinfection properties of the disinfectant under study.
An aqueous emulsion of T. canis egg culture in the amount of 300-600 specimens that were at the protoplast stage (before blastomere fragmentation) and larvae were transferred to sterile test objects (wood, tiles, metal).
Excess water was removed with filter paper strips. After that, the research and control test objects were placed in boxes at a room temperature of 20-25±0.5°C. Then the test samples were treated with solutions of disinfectants, which were evenly applied to the test objects. On control samples, sterile isotonic solution was applied in the same volume. After applying disinfectants, helminth eggs were washed three times with water and examined under a microscope in order to identify changes in their structure (changes in membranes, embryos and inhibition of embryogenesis). Special methods were also used: coloring the eggs, observing their development in favorable conditions, provoking movement and hatching of the larva, feeding the experimental animals (bio method).
For coloring the eggs of the control and experimental cultures, we used the technique proposed by Maretskiy A.Ya. (1954). The method of observing the development of eggs in favorable conditions, proposed by G. Proshin (1957), was used to determine the viability of eggs at the protoplast stage after their treatment with a disinfectant. The method of provoking movement and hatching of larvae proposed by M. Zavadovskiy (1915) was used in experiments to determine the viability of only mature eggs (with formed larvae).
177 Disinvasive action of aldehyde and chlorine disinfectants
The ovocidal effect (mode of application) of a disinfectant was considered established if, during microscopic examination, the absence of development of eggs or larvae of helminths was observed after exposure to working solutions of disinfectants and the presence of development of eggs and larvae in control cultures. Determination of the disinfection effect of disinfectants during disinfection of soil contaminated with T. canis eggs was carried out according to generally accepted methods (Zavgorodniy et al., 2013).
Facilities were tested by comparison to the recommended natrium hydroxide in the concentration of 5.0% and expositions 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours. The experiment was carried out with the following types of soils: black earth, sandy loam, loamy. In four wooden boxes with holes from the bottom and walls for air penetration, partitioned into 36 sections, research samples were laid. The soil in two boxes was separately treated with research disinfectants, the positive control ("PC") was treated with 5.0% hot sodium hydroxide solution for costs 1000 cm3/m2, for negative control ("NC") distilled water was used. Each 12 sections were filled with soil of a different structure (black earth, sandy loam, loamy). Samples of test cultures of T. canis eggs, which were at the stage of blastomere cleavage and invasive larva, were placed in soil layers in sections to a depth of 1 cm, 2 cm, and 5 cm from the surface. Feces were applied on filter paper with a thin layer, into which invasive cultures of T. canis eggs were additionally introduced in an amount of at least 1000 specimens in one sample. Samples were laid in five repetitions. The working solution of the disinfectant was prepared immediately before use and tested at a flow rate of 2000 cm3/m2, 3000 cm3/m2, 4000 cm3/m2. After the appropriate exposures, the samples were taken out and examined according to the above methods.
The data were presented like athmetic mean (M) and the arithmetic mean error (m).
Results and discussion
At the preliminary stage of the research, the disinvasive action of aldehyde and chlorine disinfectants was determined based on the results of their action on the test culture of Toxocara canis helminths at different stages of development. Experiments to determine the disinvasion properties of the aldehyde agent No. 1 were performed using concentrations of 0.5%; 1.0%, 2.0%, 3.0%, 3.5% and 4.0% at a temperature of 20±0.5°C and exposure for 3, 6 and 24 hours (Table 1).
Table 1. Degree of disinvasive action of aldehyde agent No. 1 on T. canis egg culture
Concentration in preparation, % 3 Terms of living of life of Toxocara canis, day 6 14 21 Exposition, hours 28
3 6 24 3 6 24 3 6 24 3 6 24 3 6 24
0.5 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
2.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -
3.0 + + + + + - + + - + - - - - -
3.5 + + + + - - + - - - - - - - -
4.0 + + + + - - - - - - - - - - -
Positive control + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Negative control + + + + + - + + - + + - + + -
Notes - death of helminth eggs, + development of helminth eggs.
Analyzing the results presented in Table 1, it should be noted that the treatment of the test culture with solutions of aldehyde agent No. 1 at a concentration of 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% at a temperature of 20±0.5°C for 3, 6 and 24 hours did not affect the development of T. canis eggs. Treatment of the test culture with solutions of the agent with a concentration of 2.0% for 24 hours caused its death only on the 28th day. Along with this, it was determined that the concentration of the agent 3.0%, 3.5% and 4.0% affected the delay in the development of eggs of the test culture and caused their death, that is, it revealed a disinvasive property. Tool No. 1 showed the highest disinvasion activity at a concentration of 3.5-4.0% at exposure 6 and 24 hours. Experiments to determine the disinfection properties of chlorine agent No. 2 were carried out using a concentration of 2.5%, 3.0%, 3.5% and 4.0% at a temperature of 20±0.5°C and an exposure of 3, 6 and 24 hours (Table 2).
Table 2. Degree of disinfection effect of chlorine agent No. 2 on T. canis egg culture
Concentration in preparation, % 3 Terms of living of life of Toxocara canis, day 6 14 21 Exposition, hours 28
3 6 24 3 6 24 3 6 24 3 6 24 3 6 24
2.5 + + + + + - + + - + + - - - -
3.0 + + - + + - + - - - + - + - -
3.5 + + - + - - + - - - - - - - -
4.0 + + - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Positive control + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Negative control + + + + + - + + - + + - + + -
Notes - death of helminth eggs, + development of helminth eggs.
According to the results (Table 2), the concentration of chlorine disinfectant of 2.5-4.0% affected the delay in the development of eggs of the test culture and caused their death, that is, they found a disinvasive property. It should be noted that the chlorine preparation No. 2 showed the highest disinvasion activity when applied at a concentration of 3.5-4.0% at exposures of 6 and 24 hours. After obtaining preliminary positive results, the ovocidal efficiency of working solutions of disinfectants on the T. canis test culture was determined (Table 3).
Table 3. Ovocidal effectiveness of disinfectants on T. canistest culture
Test-culture Concentration, % Exposition, hours Death of helminth eggs in experimental cultures, day Ovocidal efficiency, %
Aldehyde means No 1 3 24 90.60
3.0 6 21 90.86
24 6 91.10
3 18 97.00
Toxocara canis 3.5 6 6 98.78
24 6 98.82
3 10 99.60
4.0 6 6 99.64
24 6 99.70
Toxocara canis
Chlorine means No 2
3 24 90.70
2.5 6 24 90.88
24 16 91.15
3 16 97.40
3.0 6 10 98.78
24 3 98.82
3 6 99.65
4.0 6 6 99.68
24 3 99.73
Analyzing the results shown in Table 3, it should be noted that the ovocidal effect of means No. 1 at a concentration of 3.0% and an exposure of 3:00 was equal to 90.60% and was lower than in means No. 2 by 6.7%. In general, the ovocidal efficiency of T. canis eggs for the investigated exposures of means No. 1 is from 90.60% to 99.70%, and means No. 2 - from 97.40% to 98.82%. Based on preliminary experience data to determine decontaminating concentrations of disinfectants on the surface of test objects (wood, tile, metal) the means No. 1 was used in concentrations of 3.5% and 4.0%, and the means No. 2 - in concentrations of 3.0% and 4.0% (Table 4).
Table 4. Disinfectant properties of disinfectants relative to the T. canistest culture applied to the test objects
Concentration, % Test-object 3 Exposition, hours 6 Average OE of 3 experiment 24
tile 80.44±0.0f 80.89±0.0f 92.33±0.01
3.5 wood 69.22±0.0f 79.78±0.01 80.67±0.01
metal 90.33±0.01 90.58±0.01 93.87±0.01
tile 91.10±0.01* 99.64±0.01 99.70±0.01
4.0 wood 80.44±0.0f 90.60±0.02 90.85±0.02
metal 99.55±0.01 99.64±0.01 99.90±0.01
tile 83.44±0.0f 86.89±0.01 96.40±0.01
3.0 wood 70.22±0.0f 80.78±0.02 94.78±0.01
metal 92.33±0.0f 92.58±0.01 98.82±0.02
tile 93.10±0.01* 99.78±0.01 99.83±0.01
4.0 wood 81.64±0.01* 90.68±0.02 95.65±0.01
metal 99.65±0.01 99.84±0.01 99.93±0.01
tile - - -
Positive wood - - -
metal - - -
tile - - 90.70±0.01
Negative wood - - 53.70±0.02
metal - - 90.70±0.01
Notes. - failure OE, p<0.05.
179 Disinvasive action of aldehyde and chlorine disinfectants
During realization of researches on determination of disinvasive properties of means № 1 relatively the test culture of T. canis inflicted and test-objects set that 3.5% and 4.0% solutions on the surface of all test objects for culture of und out disinvasive properties. Preparation No. 2 relative to the test culture of T. canis applied and the test objects showed disinfection properties at a concentration of 3.0% and 4.0%. It should be noted that in the conditions of study of sensitiveness of eggs of helmints of T. canisin disinfectant at treatments it is necessary to take into account physical description of surfaces, that stipulates efficiency of disinfestation. In particular, according to the results obtained, disinfectants at the tested concentrations of all exposures showed disinfection properties on the surface of tiles and metal plates, but had a lower disinfection activity on unpainted wood, therefore, the rougher the surface of the object is processed, the lower the efficiency of its disinfection. Comparing the results of the experiments, it should be noted that the exposure of time (6 and 24 hours) affects the disinvasive activity of the means, that is, the degree of inhibition of the development of test cultures and their death. It was found that during disinfestation, an exposure of at least 3:00 is required.
In order to determine the possibility of disinfecting soil contaminated with T. canis eggs, means No. 1 was used at a concentration of 4.0% at various consumption rates (Table 5).
Table 5. Ovocidal efficiency of 4.0% solution of means No. 1 on T. canis eggs in soils (n=5)
Soil type Laying depth, cm Exposition, hours experiment Ovocidal efficiency, % negative control positive control
24 94.8±1.20 is absent 91.6±1.20
1 48 100 is absent 100
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
24 93.8±1.69 is absent 92.8±1 .69
2 48 99.8±0.73 is absent 98.8±0.73
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
t 24 88.4±3.26" is absent 77.4±3.78
TO e 5 48 91.8±1.54" is absent 80.6±3.06
c 72 92.2±2.27" is absent 87.0±1 .82
ru m 96 92.0±2.49" is absent 88.0±1 .87
24 100 is absent 100
1 48 100 is absent 100
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
24 100 is absent 85.2±2.24
2 48 100 is absent 86.8±1 .36
72 100 is absent 92.2±1 .16
96 100 is absent 90.0±1 .00
m fD 24 94.2±1.43" is absent 87.2±3.15
_o 5 48 95.6±1.57" is absent 92.2±1.24
y d n 72 95.6±1.20" is absent 92.6±2.32
TO S 96 96.6±2.16" is absent 91.8±2.31
24 100 is absent 100
1 48 100 is absent 100
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
24 100 is absent 96.8±1 .85
2 48 100 is absent 99.2±0.58
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
24 84.0±2.5f is absent 75.0±2.64
5 48 87.4±2.44t is absent 78.6±2.32
y m 72 87.8±2.42" is absent 82.0±2.17
TO o 96 88.2±1.93" is absent 82.4±1 .29
p<0.05.
According to the results of the studies, it was found that disinfection of soil (black earth) to a depth of 1 cm from helminth eggs with means No. 1 is achieved when it is used at a concentration of 4.0% at a consumption rate of 1000 cm3/m2 and exposure for 24 hours (80.6%). At a depth of 5 cm, the maximum efficiency (74%) was found when the agent was applied with an exposure of 48 hours. In loamy soil at a depth of 1 cm with an ovocidal exposure for 24 hours, the disinfectant efficiency was 80.8%. High efficiency of 4.0% solution of preparation No. 1 was found at a consumption rate of 2000 cm3/m2 for T. canis eggs in all types of soil at a depth of 1 -2 cm, starting from a 24-hour exposure. In the control, the viability of toxocara was 95%. The efficiency of
hot 5.0% sodium hydroxide solution at a flow rate of 1000 cm3/m2 was from 84.0±2.51 % in loamy soil at a depth of 5 cm with an exposure of 24 hours to 100% in all soils at a depth of 1 and 2 cm.
At a depth of 5 cm in black earth, the efficiency of the means No. 1 was the maximum at exposure of 72 hours and amounted to 87.0±1.82%, in the sandy loam soil - 92.2±1.16% at the same exposure, in the loamy soil - 82.4±1.29% at 96 hours exposure.In sandy loam soils, the level of disinvasion efficacy of the aldehyde agent was high (100%) at a depth of 1 cm over a 24-hour exposure. At a depth of 2 cm, the disinvasion efficiency of the drug decreased by 7.4% (p<0.01), but with an extension of the exposure for 48 hours, it was 100%. At a depth of 5 cm, the drug activity varied from 87.0±2.45% to 93.2±1.66%. The best results were obtained at a consumption rate of 3000 cm3/m2.
In sandy loam soils, the level of disinvasion efficiency of the aldehyde means was high (100%) at a depth of 1 cm and 2 cm after a 24-hour exposure. At a depth of 5 cm, the drug activity varied from 94.2±1.43% to 96.6±2.16%. In loamy soil at a depth of 5 cm for a 24-hour exposure, the level of disinvasion efficiency was 9% higher than the level of the positive control. So a 4.0% solution of means No. 1 at a consumption rate of 3000 cm3/m2 can be used for soil disinfection.
In order to determine the possibility of disinfecting soil contaminated with T. canis helminth eggs, chlorine means No. 2 at a concentration of 4.0% was used at various consumption rates (Table 6).
Table 6. Ovocidal efficiency of 4.0% solution of agent No. 2 on T. canis eggs in soils (n=5)
Soil type Laying depth, cm Exposition, hours experiment Ovocidal efficiency, % negative control positive control
24 96.3±1.20 is absent 91.6±1.20
1 48 100 is absent 100
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
24 93.6±1.69 is absent 92.8±1 .69
2 48 98.9±0.73 is absent 98.8±0.73
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
t 24 68.4±3.26" is absent 77.4±3.78
TO e 5 48 65.8±1.54" is absent 80.6±3.06
c 72 63.0±2.27 is absent 87.0±1 .82
TO m 96 63.0±2.49" is absent 88.0±1 .87
24 100 is absent 100
1 48 100 is absent 100
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
24 100 is absent 85.2±2.24
2 48 100 is absent 86.8±1 .36
72 100 is absent 92.2±1.16
96 100 is absent 90.0±1 .00
E fD 24 70.2±1.43" is absent 87.2±3.15
_o 5 48 72.6±1.57" is absent 92.2±1.24
y d n 72 71.6±1.20" is absent 92.6±2.32
TO S 96 70.6±2.16" is absent 91.8±2.31
24 100 is absent 100
1 48 100 is absent 100
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
24 100 is absent 96.8±1 .85
2 48 100 is absent 99.2±0.58
72 100 is absent 100
96 100 is absent 100
24 66.0±2.5f is absent 75.0±2.64
y 5 48 61.4±2.44 is absent 78.6±2.32
E TO o 72 60.8±2.42" is absent 82.0±2.17
96 60.2±1.93" is absent 82.4±1.29
Notes. p<0.05.
According to the results of the studies, it was found that disinfection of soil (black earth) to a depth of 1 cm from helminth eggs with agent No. 2 is achieved when it is applied at a concentration of 4.0% at a consumption rate of 1000 cm3/m2 and exposure for 24 hours (90.6%). At a depth of 5 cm, the maximum efficiency (61 %) was found when the agent was used with an exposure of 72 hours. In loamy soil at a depth of 1 cm with an ovocidal exposure for 24 hours, the effectiveness of agent No. 2 was 87.8%, in sandy soil - 92.3%. However, at a depth of 5 cm, its effectiveness was low - 60.5% and 61.7% in line. When the consumption rate increased to 2000 cm3/m2, decontamination of the soil (black earth) to a depth of 1 cm from helminth eggs, the means No.
181 Disinvasive action of aldehyde and chlorine disinfectants
2 achieved an efficiency of 96.3% at 24 hours exposure. At a depth of 5 cm maximum efficiency (63.0%) identified when using the tool at least 72 hours of exposure. So, chlorine agent No. 2 for decontamination of the soil is not recommended, as it is effective only at a depth of up to 2 cm.
It has been reported that the treatment of A. suum eggs with many commercially available disinfectants does not affect embryogenesis. Although some disinfectants can delay or stop the development of A. suumeggs, they are unlikely to completely kill them (Oh et al., 2016). Our results complement other studies that have proven disinvasive activity against helminth eggs (A. coiumbae) formalin, povidone iodide and TH4 (Bessat & Dewair, 2019). In other experiments, it was found that quaternary ammonium compounds do not affect Ascarissuumeggs, but phenol (5.0%) and cresol (3.0%) are effective (Labare et al., 2013), as well as ammonia (Pecson & Nelson, 2005), some short-chain fatty acids (Butkus et al., 2011), preparations based on sodium hypochlorite (Naidoo et al., 2016).
The high disinfecting efficiency of Virkon®S on Toxascaris leonina has been proven (El-Dakhly et al., 2018). In a comparative study of a number of disinfectants, iodine turned out to be the most effective on T. canis eggs, even in comparison with glutaraldehyde (Aygigek et al., 2001), ethanol and sodium hypochlorite (Morrondo et al., 2006), 50% hydrogen peroxide solution and 3.0% benzene dehydroxide (Shalaby et al., 2011). Other researchers indicate that disinfectants based on benzalkonium chloride and formaldehyde did not affect the embryogenesis of T. canis (Verocai et al., 2010). Bleach turned out to be an ineffective disinfectant for the eggs of these hel minths (von Dohlen et al., 2017). The issue of disinfection of livestock facilities under low ambient temperatures remains relevant today (Paliy et al., 2020b).
Taking into account the results obtained, it should be noted that disinfection of environmental objects with highly effective disinfectants (Paliy et al., 2015; 2016; 2020a) is a reliable and effective means of preventing outbreaks of infectious and parasitic diseases (Zavgorodniy et al., 2013).
Conclusions
Aldehyde disinfectant, which contains didecyldimethylammonium chloride (2.25%), benzalkonium chloride (8.0%), glutaraldehyde (15.0%), phosphoric acid, nonionic surfactants, water exhibits disinvasive activity against the test-cultures of T. canis eggs at a concentration of 2.0-4.0% at a temperature of 20±0.5°C and an exposure of 3-24 hours, while the ovocidal efficiency is from 90.60% to 99.70%. It was found that the specified aldehyde disinfectant can be used for disinfection of soil (black earth, sandy loam, loamy) contaminated with T. canis eggs, at a concentration of 4.0% at 6:00 exposure and a consumption rate of 3000 cm3/m2.
A chlorine agent that contains dichlorantin, dimethylhydantoin (12.4-16.4%), a dispersant (9.0-12%), nonionic surfactants, a corrosion inhibitor, a filler exhibits disinvasive activity in relation to the test culture of T. canis at a concentration of 3.0-4.0% with an exposure of 3-24 hours, and the ovocidal efficiency in this case ranges from 97.40% to 98.82%. It is not advisable to use the chlorine agent under study for soil disinfection, since it is effective only at a depth of up to 2 cm at a concentration of 4.0% at a consumption rate of 1000 cm3/m2 and an exposure time of 24 hours.
The results obtained expand the range of highly effective disinfectants that exhibit disinvasive properties on exogenous forms of helminth development, and can be used in the general complex of veterinary and sanitary preventive and therapeutic measures.
References
Abou-El-Naga, I. F. (2018). Developmental stages and viability of Toxocara canis eggs outside the host. Biomedica, 38(2), 189197. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v38i0.3684 Aygigek, H., Yarsan, E., Sarimehmetoglu, H. O., Tanyuksel, M., Girginkardesler, N., & Ozyurt, M. (2001). Efficacy of Some
Disinfectants on Embryonated Eggs of Toxocara canis. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 31(1), 35-39. Azam, D., Ukpai, O., Said, A. E., Abd-Allah, G. A., & Morgan, E. (2011). Temperature and the development and survival of infective
Toxocara canis larvae. Parasitology Research, 110(2), 649-656. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011 -2536-8 Bessat, M., & Dewair, A. (2019). Assessment of the inhibitory effects of disinfectants on the embryonation of Ascaridia columbae
eggs. PLOS ONE, 14(5), e0217551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217551 Butkus, M. A., Hughes, K. T., Bowman, D. D., Liotta, J. L., Jenkins, M. B., & Labare, M. P. (2011). Inactivation of Ascaris suum by
short-chain fatty acids. Applied and environmental microbiology, 77(1), 363-366. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01675-10 Chen, J., Liu, Q., Liu, G. H., Zheng, W. B., Hong, S. J., Sugiyama, H., Zhu, X. Q., & Elsheikha, H. M. (2018). Toxocariasis: a silent threat
with a progressive public health impact. Infectious diseases of poverty, 7(1), 59. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0437-0 Dalimi, A., Sattari, A., & Motamedi, Gh. (2006). A study on intestinal helminthes of dogs, foxes and jackals in the western part of
Iran. Veterinary parasitology, 142(1 -2), 129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.06.024 Despommier, D. (2003). Toxocariasis: clinical aspects, epidemiology, medical ecology, and molecular aspects. Clinical
microbiology reviews, 16(2), 265-272. doi: 10.1128/cmr.16.2.265-272.2003 Dunsmore, J. D., Thompson, R. C., & Bates, I. A. (1984). Prevalence and survival of Toxocara canis eggs in the urban environment
of Perth, Australia. Veterinary parasitology, 16(3-4), 303-311. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(84)90048-7 El-Dakhly, Kh. M., Aboshinaf, A. S. M., Arafa, W. M., Mahrous, L. N., El-Nahass, E., Gharib, A.F., Holman, P.J., & Craig, T. M. (2018). In vitro study of disinfectants on the embryonation and survival of Toxascaris leonina eggs. Journal of Helminthology, 92(5), 530-534. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X17000839
Labare, M. P., Soohoo, H., Kim, D., Tsoi, Ky., Liotta, J. L., & Bowman, D. D. (2013). Ineffectiveness of a quaternary ammonium salt and povidone-iodine for the inactivation of Ascaris suum eggs. American journal of infection control, 41 (4), 360-361. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.013
Melnichuk, V., & Yuskiv, I. (2018). Disinvasive efficacy of chlorine-based preparations of domestic production for eggs of nematodes of the species Aonchotheca bovis parasitizing in sheep. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, 1 (2), 15-18. doi: 10.32718/ujvas1 -2.04 Mizgajska, H. (2001). Eggs of Toxocara spp. in the environment and their public health implications. Journal of Helminthology,
75(2), 147-151. doi: 10.1079/J0H200170 Mizgajska-Wiktor, H., & Jarosz, W. (2007). A comparison of soil contamination with Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati eggs in rural and urban areas of Wielkopolska district in 2000-2005. Wiadomosci parazytologiczne, 53(3), 219-225. PMID: 18075154 Mizgajska-Wiktor, H., Jarosz, W., Fogt-Wyrwas, R., & Drzewiecka, A. (2017). Distribution and dynamics of soil contamination with Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati eggs in Poland and prevention measures proposed after 20 years of study. Veterinary parasitology, 234, 1 -9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.12.011 Morrondo, P., Díez-Morrondo, C., Pedreira, J., Díez-Baños, N., Sánchez-Andrade, R., Paz-Silva, A., & Díez-Baños, P. (2006). Toxocara canis larvae viability after disinfectant-exposition. Parasitology research, 99(5), 558-561. doi: 10.1007/s00436-006-0200-5
Naidoo, D., Archer, C. E., Louton, B., & Rodda, N. (2016). Testing household disinfectants for the inactivation of helminth eggs
on surfaces and in spills during pit latrine emptying. Water SA, 42(4), 560. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v42i4.06 Nicoletti, A. (2013). Toxocariasis. Handbook of clinical neurology, 114, 217-128. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53490-3.00016-9 Oh, K. S., Kim, G. T., Ahn, K. S., & Shin, S. S. (2016). Effects of Disinfectants on Larval Development of Ascaris suum Eggs. The
Korean journal of parasitology, 54(1), 103-107. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2016.54.1.103 Overgaauw, P. A., & van Knapen, F. (2013). Veterinary and public health aspects of Toxocara spp. Veterinary parasitology, 193(4),
398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.035 Paliy, A. P., Mashkey, A. M., Sumakova, N. V., & Paliy, A. P. (2018a). Distribution of poultry ectoparasites in industrial farms, farms,
and private plots with different rearing technologies. Biosystems Diversity, 26(2), 153-159. doi: 10.15421/011824 Paliy, A. P., Stegniy, B. T., Kuzminov, A. V., Buzun, A. I., Gerilovich, A. P., Bogach, M. V., & Stegniy, M. Y. (2020a). Effectiveness of aldehyde disinfectant "DZPT-2" against the African swine fever virus. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(3), 131 -138. doi : 10.15421 /2020_146
Paliy, A. P., Stegniy, B. T., Muzyka, D. V., Gerilovych, A. P., & Korneykov, O. M. (2016). The study of the properties of the novel
virucidal disinfectant. Agricultural Science and Practice, 3(3), 41 -47. doi: 10.15407/agrisp3.03.041 Paliy, A. P., Sumakova, N. V., Mashkey, A. M., Petrov, R. V., Paliy, A. P., & Ishchenko, K. V. (2018b). Contamination of animal-
keeping premises with eggs of parasitic worms. Biosystems Diversity, 26(4), 327-333. doi: 10.15421/011849 Paliy, A. P., Sumakova, N. V., Paliy, A .P., & Ishchenko, K. V. (2018c). Biological control of house fly. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology,
8(2), 230-234. doi: 10.15421 /2018_332 Paliy, A. P., Zavgorodnii, A. I., Kalashnyk, M. V., Shkromada, O. I., Rybachuk, Z. V., Dolbanosova, R. V., Kovalenko, L. M., Livoshchenko, Ye. M., Livoshchenko, L. P., Baidevliatova, Yu. V., Dunaiev, Yu. K., Palii, A. P., & Nedzheria, T. I. (2020b). Influence of new frost-resistant disinfectant on the ultrastructural organization of atypical mycobacteria. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(3), 95-101. doi: 10.15421 /2020_139 Paliy, A. P., Zavgorodniy, A. I., Stegniy, B. T., & Gerilovych, A. P. (2015). A study of the efficiency of modern domestic disinfectants
in the system of TB control activities. Agricultural Science and Practice, 2(2), 26-31. doi: 10.15407/agrisp2.02.026 Paliy, A. P., Zavgorodniy, A. I., Stegniy, B. T., & Palii, A. P. (2020c). Scientific and methodological grounds for controlling the
development and use of disinfectants. Monograph. Kharkiv: «Miskdruk», 318. ISBN: 978-617-619-237-4. (in Ukrainian) Paliy, A., Sumakova, N., Petrov, R., Shkromada, O., Ulko, L., & Palii, A. (2019). Contamination of urbanized territories with eggs of
helmiths of animals. Biosystems Diversity, 27(2), P. 118-124. doi: 10.15421 /011916 Papavasilopoulos, V., Pitiriga, V., Birbas, K., Elefsiniotis, J., Bonatsos, G., & Tsakris, A. (2018). Soil contamination by Toxocara canis
and human seroprevalence in the Attica region, Greece. Germs, 8(3), 155-161. doi: 10.18683/germs.2018.1143 Pecson, B. M., & Nelson, K. L. (2005). Inactivation of Ascaris suum eggs by ammonia. Environmental science & technology, 39(20),
7909-7914. doi: 10.1021/es050659a Rahbar, A., Alborzi, A., & Seifi Abad Shapoori, M. (2015). An alternative method for producing Toxocara canis second stage larvae from a paratenic host (pigeon) for mRNA extraction purpose. Journal of parasitic diseases, 39(2), 186-189. doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0310-9
Raissi, V., Saber, V., Zibaei, M., Bahadory, S., Akhlaghi, E., Raiesi, O., Aslani., R., Shamsi, L., Graili, A., & Ibrahim, A. (2019). Comparison of the prevalence of Toxocara spp. eggs in public parks soils in different seasons, from 2017 to 2018, Tehran Province, Iran. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 8(2), 450-454. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2019.10.007 Ristic, M., Miladinovic-Tasic, N., Dimitrijevic, S., Nenadovic, K., Bogunovic, D., Stepanovic, P., & Ilic, T. (2020). Soil and sand contamination with canine intestinal parasite eggs as a risk factor for human health in public parks in Nis (Serbia). Helminthologia, 57(2), 109-119. doi: 10.2478/helm-2020-0018 Rosa Xavier, I. G., Ramos, B. C., & Santarém, V. A. (2010). Recovery threshold of Toxocara canis eggs from soil. Veterinary
parasitology, 167(1), 77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.052 Shalaby, H. A., Abdel-Shafy, S., Ashry, H. M., & El-Moghazy, F. M. (2011). Efficacy of Hydrogen Peroxide and Dihydroxy Benzol Mixture (Disinfectant) on Toxocara canisEggs. Research Journal of Parasitology, 6, 144-150. doi: 10.3923/jp.2011.144.150
183
Disinvasive action of aldehyde and chlorine disinfectants
Sommerfelt, I. E., Cardillo, N., López, C., Ribicich, M., Gallo, C., & Franco, A. (2006). Prevalence of Toxocara cati and other parasites in cats' faeces collected from the open spaces of public institutions: Buenos Aires, Argentina. Veterinary parasitology, 140(3-4), 296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.03.022 Strube, C., Heuer, L., & Janecek, E. (2013). Toxocara spp. infections in paratenic hosts. Veterinary Parasitology, 193(4), 375-389.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.033 Sudhakar, N. R, Samanta, S., Sahu, S., Raina, O. K., Gupta, S. C., Madhu, D. N., & Kumar, A. (2013). Prevalence of Toxocara species eggs in soil samples of public health importance in and around Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India. Vet. World, 6(2), 87-90. doi: 10.5455/vetworld.2013.87-90
Tarsitano, E., Greco, G., Decaro, N., Nicassio, F., Lucente, M. S., Buonavoglia, C., & Tempesta, M. (2010). Environmental Monitoring and Analysis of Faecal Contamination in an Urban Setting in the City of Bari (Apulia Region, Italy): Health and Hygiene Implications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(11), 3972-3986. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7113972
Thomas, D., & Jeyathilakan, N. (2014). Detection of Toxocara eggs in contaminated soil from various public places of Chennai city and detailed correlation with literature. Journal of parasitic diseases, 38(2), 174-180. doi: 10.1007/s12639-012-0217-x Ubhayawardana, N., Liyanage, I. G., Herath, H. M. J. C. B., Amarasekera, U., Dissanayake, T., de Silva, S., Fernando, N., & Ekanayake, S. (2018). Direct Microscopy of Stool Samples for Determining the Prevalence of Soil-Transmitted Helminthic Infections among Primary School Children in Kaduwela MOH Area of Sri Lanka following Floods in 2016. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2018, ID 4929805. doi: 10.1155/2018/4929805 Verocai, G. G., Tavares, P. V., Ribeiro, Fde. A., Correia, T. R., & Scott, F. B. (2010). Effects of disinfectants on Toxocara canis embryogenesis and larval establishment in mice tissues. Zoonoses and public health, 57(7-8), e213-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01330.x
von Dohlen, A. R., Houk-Miles, A. E., Zajac, A. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Flotation of Toxocara canis Eggs in Commercial Bleach and Effects of Bleach Treatment Times on Larval Development in These Eggs. Journal of Parasitology, 103(2), 183-186. doi: 10.1645/16-123
Zavgorodniy, A. I., Stegniy, B. T., Paliy, A. P., Gorjeev, V. M., & Smirnov, A. M. (2013). Scientific and practical aspects of disinfection in veterinary medicine. Kharkiv: FOP Brovin O.V., 222. ISBN 978-966-2445-59-6. (in Ukrainian)
Citation:
Paliy, A.P., Sumakova, N.V., Rodionova, K.O., Nalivayko, L.I., Boyko, V.S., Ihnatieva, T.M., Zhigalova, O.Ye., Dudus, T.V., Anforova, M.V., Kazakov, M.V. (2020). Disinvasive action of aldehyde and chlorine disinfectants on the test-culture of Toxocara canis eggs.
Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(4), 175-183. I ("OE^^^MI This work Is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. License
