CC BY
30
Turczaninowia 25, 2: 137-150 (2022) DOI: 10.14258/turczaninowia.25.2.13 http://turczaninowia.asu.ru
ISSN 1560-7259 (print edition)
TURCZANINOWIA
ISSN 1560-7267 (online edition)
УДК 582.948.2:581.9(55)
Diversity centers as well as conservation priorities of the genus Onosma L. (Boraginaceae) in Iran
F. Khajoei Nasab1, 2, A. R. Mehrabian1, 3*
1 Department of Plant Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2325-9555 3E-mail: a_mehrabian@sbu.ac.ir; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-3092
Keywords: areas of endemism, Boraginaceae, conservation, important plant areas, species richness.
Summary. Conservation of biological diversity is one of the most important issues in conservation biology, so a wide range of quantitative spatial methods have been used to determine the biodiversity hotspots and the conservation priority areas. The main aims of the present study are determining the areas of endemism as well as the centers of diversity of the genus Onosma based on the GIE, IPAs, species richness, and AZE-like criteria approaches, to assess the status and priorities of conservation of the mentioned genus in Iran. Based on the findings of this research, centers of species richness, the main areas of endemism, top-ranked IPAs, and AZE-like criteria are situated in the Zagros ecosystems. The comparison of the four approaches used in this study shows that the IPAs and GIE techniques have succeeded in identifying the most important centers of diversity and endemism of Onosma in Iran. Considering that this genus with a high percentage of endemic species is one of the most important genera of Iranian flora and only 46 % of the IPAs and areas of endemism specified in the research are located in protected areas, identification and protection of the rest of these areas is one of the prevalent measures needed for conservation of Onosma species diversity in Iran.
Ключевые слова: видовое богатство, ключевые ботанические территории, области эндемизма, сохранение, Boraginaceae.
Аннотация. Сохранение биологического разнообразия является одним из наиболее важных вопросов охраны природы. В настоящее время для определения очагов биоразнообразия и ключевых природоохранных зон используется широкий спектр аналитических методов. Основные цели настоящего исследования - выявление очагов эндемизма и центров видового богатства рода Onosma в Иране посредством географической интерполяции эндемизма (Geographical Interpolation of Endemism, GIE) и определения ключевых ботанических территорий (Important Plant Areas, IPA), а также оценка состояния и выработка стратегии сохранения рода на территории страны с использованием критериев, разработанных Альянсом за нулевое вымирание (Alliance for Zero Extinction, AZE). Результаты исследования показали, что центры видового разнообразия и основные районы эндемизма рода Onosma в Иране расположены в пределах Загроса, что было выявлено главным образом методами географической интерполяции эндемизма и определения ключевых ботанических территорий. Учитывая, что изучаемый род, характеризующийся высоким процентом эндемичных видов, является одним
Corresponding author
Центры разнообразия и приоритеты сохранения рода Onosma L. (Boraginaceae) в Иране
Ф. Хаджойи Насаб, А. Р. Меграбиан
Университет Шахида Бехешти, г. Тегеран, Иран
Поступило в редакцию 24.07.2021 Принято к публикации 31.05.2022
Submitted 24.07.2021 Accepted 31.05.2022
из важнейших родов иранской флоры, и только 46 % ключевых участков, в т. ч. очагов эндемизма, выявленных в настоящем исследовании, находятся под государственной охраной, включение максимального числа остальных в сеть ООПТ является наиболее очевидной и действенной мерой для сохранения видового разнообразия Onosma в Иране.
Introduction
Rapidly declining global biodiversity (Myer, 1980) has led to increased rates of permanent damage to natural ecosystems and has reinforced the need for biodiversity data banking (Mutke, Barthlott, 2005). Data banking is the most important step in the planning of conservation priorities (Lovett et al., 2000; Kier et al., 2009). Conserving biodiversity is one of the most important targets of conservation biology (McNeely et al., 1990). Regardless, experts often believe that protection is not possible only through the creation of protected areas or reserves based on classic methods (Wilcove, 1989), so a wide range of quantitative methods has been used to determine the conservation-priority biodiversity hotspots (Myers, 1990).
Species richness (alpha diversity) is one of the most widely used measures to evaluate biodiversity hotspots. In addition to species richness, identifying areas of endemism (AOEs) and endemic diversity are among the most important approaches in evaluating the value of areas for protection. Endemic plants are the natural heritage of nations and represent the phytogeographic position and evolutionary history of the flora of each geographic area. Areas of endemism (AOEs) as one of the main candidates for protection of natural plant diversity have been evaluated by diverse methods such as PAE (Morrone, 1994), AE (Szumik, Goloboff, 2004), and GIE (Oliveira et al., 2015). The Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) sites are including the Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) that have one or more species listed as Endangered (EN) or Critically Endangered (CR) in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Using AZE-like criteria could be another effective approach in determining protected areas at the regional levels. Recently the identification and conservation of Important Plant Areas (IPAs) have been endorsed according to Target 5 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC-CBD). IPAs are identified at a national or regional level basis of three consistent criteria: the presence of threatened species, botanical richness, and the presence of threatened habitats (Anderson, 2002).
Onosma L. is the third large genus of plants in the borage family, Boraginaceae, with nearly 240 species of the biennial to perennial herbs (Popov, 1950, 1974; Zemskova, Popova, 1991; Jian-Chang
et al., 1995; Mehrabian et al., 2013; Cecchi et al., 2016; Mehrabian, Amini Rad, 2018; Mehrabian, Mozaffarian, 2018; Khajoei Nasab et al., 2020a) distributed in mountain steppe of the Irano-Turanian region of Asia along with the Mediterranean region, especially Iran and Turkey (Meusel et al., 1978; Mehrabian, 2015; Cecchi et al., 2016; Khajoei Nasab et al., 2020b; Mehrabian et al., 2022a, b). So far about 69 plant taxa of this genus have been reported in Iran, many of which are endemic to the flora of Iran (Mehrabian, Amini Rad, 2018; Khatamsaz, 2002; Attar et al., 2020). Despite the importance of this genus in the world, there are few geographical and ecological studies on Onosma in the world. Mehrabian (2015) assessed distribution patterns and diversity of Onosma in Iran. Recently, distribution patterns, diversity, and conservation priorities of Onosma in some sections of the northwestern geomorphologic unit and Central Alborz of Iran were investigated (Moradi Zeinab et al., 2019; Khajoei Nasab et al., 2020a, b).
Iran has an exceptional plant species richness in southwest Asia, but so far relatively few comparative studies have been conducted using the IPA, AZE, GIE approaches. Considering the importance of the genus Onosma, comprehensive ecological and geographical studies in the species and habitat are necessary to determine the important areas of the diversity of this genus in Iran. The main aims of the present study are to determine the areas of endemism and centres of diversity based on IPAs and AZE-like criteria, to assess the status and priorities of conservation of this genus in Iran.
Materials and Methods
Study Area, Distribution and Ecology of the genus Onosma
Iran as a known country in southwestern Asia located in the dry belt of Asia between 24°-40°N longitude and 44°-64°E latitude, with a total surface area of1.6 million km2 and a population of about 81/5 million in 2018. The average elevation of Iran is 1305 m a. s. l. and Damavand is the highest peak (5771 m). The country is mostly mountainous (55 %) and is surrounded by several high mountain ranges (Fig. 1). The Zagros mountain range is 1600 km long and is the longest mountain range in Iran. Iran's climate is
very diverse due to the vast extension of latitude, the existence of high mountains with extreme climate changes over altitudinal gradients, and the position of Iran between the Arabian desert areas and the eastern Mediterranean regions (Roozitalab et al., 2018). The desert and semi-arid climates are dominant climates due to Iran being located in the Afro-Asian desert belt. The average annual precipitation and average annual temperature in different regions
of Iran are highly variable. Onosma is distributed
in the highland ecosystems of Iran, including the Kopet Dagh in the northeast, the southern slopes of the Alborz, the western and eastern slopes of the Zagros, the Central Iran mountains and part of the Makran Mountains (Mehrabian, 2015) (Fig. 1). The genus is completely absent in desert areas in central Iran, as well as in the coastal areas of Caspian Sea, Persian Gulf and Oman Sea. Onosma species are often found in four types of habitats: 1 - Woodland of Quercus or Pistacia-Amygdalus in the Zagros. Species are found in this type of habitat at altitudes between 1500-3100 m. Annual rainfall is more than 300 mm. Mediterranean pluviseasonal-continental and Mediterranean xeric-continental bioclimates predominate in these habitats. Species often grow in alkaline and organic matter-rich soils. O. marivanensis Mozaff. et Mehrabian,
O. mozaffariani Mehrabian, O. sheidaii Mehrabian, O. platyphylla Riedl, O. bakhteganensis Mozaff. et Mehrabian, O. sarvestanica Mozaff. et Mehrabian and O. sanandajensis Mehrabian et Mozaff. are found in these habitats. 2 - Mountain shrub-steppe. These habitats are often found in the mountain ecosystems of northwestern (West Azarbaijan and Ardabil provinces) and Central Iran (Fars, Kerman and Yazd provinces). The altitude in these habitats is between 2000-3500 m. Mediterranean xeric-continental, Mediterranean pluviseasonal-oceanic and Mediterranean pluviseasonal-continental bioclimates constitute the dominant bioclimatic units in these habitats. Onosma species are commonly found in alkaline soils with sandy-loamy or sandy-loamy-clay texture (Moradi et al., 2019). The most prominent species of these habitats are O. subsericea Freyn, O. stenosiphon Boiss., O. sabalanica Ponert. and O. elwendica Wettst. 3 - Mountain shrubs-meadow steppe. These habitats harbor many species of this genus in the uplands of Alborz, Kopt Dagh, Zagros, and parts of Central Iran. Altitude in these habitats varies between 300-3100 m and often has a gentle-steep slope. Mediterranean pluviseasonal-continental, Mediterranean pluviseasonal-oceanic, Mediterranean xeric-continental, and Mediterranean desertic-continental bioclimates are
45°0'0"E 50°0'0"E 55°0'0"E 60°0'0"E
45°0'0"E 50°0'0"E 55o0'0"E 60°0'0"E
Fig. 1. Map of the study area and Occurrences points of Onosma spp. in Iran.
found in these habitats. Species such as O. gaubae Bornm., O. longiloba Bge., O. mousavi Mehrabian et Amini Rad, O. pachypoda Boiss., O. rascheyana Boiss. and O. sericea Willd grow in these habitats. 4 - Wasteland and agricultural habitat. A small number of species such as O. straussii Khatamsaz and O. bulbotricha DC. are found in this habitat.
Methods
Data banking
We prepared a geo-referenced database of Onosma species from all sites of this genus reported in Iran. The main distribution data sources include historical data available in "Flora Iranica" (Riedl, 1967), "Flora of Iran" (Khatamsaz, 2002), information provided by recently published articles (Ranjbar, Almasi, 2015; Mehrabian et al., 2013, 2018a), and recent data obtained from our fieldworks during 2009-2018 (acronyms according to Thiers, 2019). In this study, more than 400 surveys were conducted in 300 areas across 27 provinces of Iran. The "Flora Iranica" as well some new Iranian literature (e. g. Mehrabian et al., 2013; Mehrabian, Amini Rad, 2018; Mehrabian, Mozaffarian, 2018) and the website of Tropicos (www.Tropicos.org) and IPNI (www.IPNI.org) were used to determine nomenclature and species description information.
IPAs and AZE sites
In biological conservation studies, the grid-based ranking system has been widely used to determine the patterns of biodiversity (McAllister et al., 1994), hotspots of species richness (Lawton et al., 1994), areas of endemism and recently in the identification of the important plant areas (Al-Abbasi et al., 2010; Dagher-Kharrat et al., 2018). The important plant areas (IPAs), total species richness, and endemic species richness of the genus Onosma were mapped in 0.25° x 0.25° resolution Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) grid cells using Geographic Information System (ArcView vs.10.3). We applied the methodology available in Plantlife International guidelines (Anderson, 2002) and other methodologies used in the recent studies (Marignani et al., 2014; Dagher-Kharrat et al., 2018) to identify IPAs worldwide. Plantlife has established three criteria to qualify IPAs following Criterion A (threatened species), Criterion B (botanical richness), and Criterion C (threatened habitats). We used the scoring method to determine the rank of each grid using the three calculated criteria (A, B, C), combined all scores for each grid cell and ranked
them. One of the measured indices used here is botanical richness (criterion B) which refers to the number of plant species present in each grid cell which is useful for measuring taxonomic diversity (Gaston, 1996). The richness index was obtained by calculating the species richness of each grid cell and ranking the cells into five levels from 0 to 5 using the Jenks natural breaks classification method (Supplementary). The presence of threatened species in each cell (specific index (SP_ index)) was also calculated (Supplementary). The list of species that satisfy criterion A or SP_ index was based on three arbitrary scales: I. IUCN red list of species. II. Rarity. III. Endemism. The red list of species was assessed based on IUCN criteria at the regional scale (IUCN, 2011) calculated by Kew GeoCAT (http://geocat.kew. org/; Buchman et al., 2011) and species were assigned to one of the following categories: Least Concern (LC), Data Deficient (DD), Near Threatened (NT), Vulnerable (VU), Endangered (EN) and Critically Endangered (CR) (Supplementary). Then a different score was given to each red-list category according to their importance i.e. 0 = Least Concern (LC), 1 = Vulnerable (VU), 2 = Endangered (EN) and 3 = Critically Endangered (CR). Species rarity was calculated using the index of species rarity (RI) (Supplementary). The RI was computed as the inverse of the cell numbers, including the target area, as RI = 1/Ci, where Ci is the number of grid cells and l is the number of taxa present (Selvi, 1997; Sapir et al., 2003) (Supplementary). The three categories and scoring based on this index were: very rare = 2, rare = 1, not rare= 0. Endemism levels for any species were as follows: endemic of three, two, and one phytogeographical provinces in Iran were scored 3, 2, and 1, respectively, and non-endemic species were scored 0 (Supplementary). The threatened habitats or habitat index (HAB_index) was based on the uniqueness and severity and the importance of each habitat during our fieldwork. Woodland of Quercus or Pistacia - Amygdalus were scored 4, Mountain shrub-steppe were scored 3, Mountain shrubs-meadow steppe was scored 2, Mountain meadow steppe was scored 1, Wasteland and agricultural habitat were scored 0. Finally, the IPA index was obtained from the sum of the points of these three indices (Supplementary). We identified AZE sites using three criteria Irreplaceability, Discreteness, and Endangerment (Langhammer, 2007). AZE sites were mapped using the number of endangered and critically endangered species in each grid cell 0.25° x 0.25° using Diva-GIS software.
Areas of Endemism (AOEs)
Most of the methods used to identify areas of endemism like PAE (Morrone, 1994) and AE (Szumik, Goloboff, 2004) use grid cells as spatial units that the size of these cells which can affect the results. Also, when a species occurs at the edges of the cells, assigning this species to a cell can also change the results. Using neighboring grid cells grouping techniques can solve the problems associated with using grid-based methods. We applied the Geographical Interpolation of Endemism (GIE) method to delimit areas of endemism of Onosma in Iran. This method was first proposed by Oliveira et al. in 2015. The GIE includes neighboring grid cells methods and identifies the areas of endemism by estimating the overlap between the distribution of species through a kernel interpolation of centroids of species distributions (Oliveira et al., 2015). Areas of endemism were identified using the GIE method in the ArcGIS software ver.10.3.
Results
In total, our database of Onosma populations contained of 1625 entries recording the presence of this genus in different parts of Iran (Fig. 1). The species richness map shows that mountainous regions of Iran such as Alborz, Zagros, Kopet Dagh, and the mountain range of the central and southern Iran are among the most desirable habitats of this genus (Fig. 2). According to our analysis the probability of the presence of this genus in the lowland and desert areas such as the central parts of Iran and the northern and southern coastal strip is zero, and so far no species has been reported in these areas. We categorized the species richness map cells into five groups of 1 to 12 species. The highest species richness (12 species) of this genus occurred in one grid cell in the parts of the Central Zagros, namely, Dalahu County in Ker-manshah province (Fig. 2). Also, two grid cells have 8 to 10 species: a cell located in Doruod of Lorestan
kilometers
Fig. 2. Species Richness map of the genus Onosma in Iran.
province and the other located at the border between Tehran and Karaj. In addition, 19 grid cells have 6-7 species, often concentrated in the northern, western, northwest, and south-western parts of Iran. The Alborz and Zagros mountains in the north, northwest, and parts of southern Iran contain 91 grid cells with 3-5 Onosma species. The map of endemic species richness was categorized into four groups of 1 to 4 species (Fig. 3). The highest endemic species rich-
ness occurs in two cells (4 species) in Lorestan province and followed by 4 grids in Lorestan province, two cells in Kermanshah province, two cells in Central Alborz, and two cells in Fars province each with three endemic species. There are also 22 cells in Za-gros ecosystems, 3 cells in central Alborz, one cell in Azerbaijan, and 2 cells in southeastern Iran, each of which has two Onosma endemic species.
Fig. 3. Endemic Species Richness map of the genus Onosma in Iran.
IPAs and AZE sites
Based on the findings of this research, the IPA index values ranged between 2 to 28, which was classified into five groups ranging from very high to low values using the Jenks natural breaks classification method (Fig. 4). According to this method, 12 grid cells are in class 5 (very high value), 23 cells into the class 4 (high value), 32 grids into the class 3 (important value), 89 cells in class 2 (medium value), and the remaining cells into the class 1 (low value).
Information about the top-ranking cells are listed in Table, and this table shows that 67 % of the grid cells (8 cells) with very high IPA value are located in the Zagros Mountains and Kermanshah province has the largest number of grid cells of class 5. Parts of the Central Alborz, i. e. Tehran and Alborz provinces, include 0.25 % (3 grid cells) of the very high value of the IPA index as well as a small part of northwest Iran located between the Alborz and the Caucasus Mountains in Ardebil province. We identi-
fied AZE sites using the number of endangered and critically endangered species in each grid cell. The highest value of AZE sites exists in a cell at the border of Lorestan and Hamedan provinces (5 species) followed by a cell in Fars province (4 species) and 7 cells in the Zagros Mountains with 3 species (Fig. 5).
Comparison of the map of protected areas of Iran, IPAs, and AZE sites shows that only 6 top-ranked IPAs and AZE sites (46 % of all) are located in the officially protected areas of Iran (Fig. 6). There are 5 cells in protected areas and one cell in the wildlife refuge.
Table
List of the 12 top ranked IPAs. Each IPA is characterized by its IPA-INDEX, species index (SP_INDEX); species richness (SP_RICHNESS); RICHNESS_INDEX; habitat index (HAB_INDEX)
Grid IPA INDEX SP_RICHNESS Richness Sp-INDEX Hab Province
Number INDEX INDEX
1 28 11 5 16 7 Kermanshah
2 26 3 2 17 7 Kermanshah
3 26 4 2 17 7 Kurdistan
4 23 7 3 15 5 Kermanshah
5 20 6 3 11 6 Kurdistan
6 19 4 2 14 3 Tehran
7 18 9 4 11 3 Alborz-Tehran
8 18 7 3 8 7 Kurdistan
9 16 6 3 10 3 Alborz
10 16 9 4 8 4 Lorestan
11 15 3 2 8 5 East Azarbaijan
12 15 5 2 9 4 Lorestan
Areas of Endemism (AOEs)
The GIE method was identified four main areas of endemism for this genus in Iran (Fig. 7). The two major areas of endemism of the genus Onosma are situated in the Zagros Mountain, i.e. AOE1 and AOE2. These regions have the highest Kernel index, and then the two areas in the Central Alborz (AOE3) and Ardabil-West Azarbaijan provinces (AOE4) have the highest rates of this index. AOE1 is located in the middle parts of the Central Zagros. The area covers the major parts of Lorestan, Hamedan and Markazi provinces. AOE1 is influenced by seven endemic species. O. asperrima, O. kotschyi, O. platyphylla, O. bilabiata Boiss., O. straussii, O. chrysochaeta Bornm. and O. kilouyense Boiss. et Hausskn. are found in this area. Moving northwest, the next AOE identify in Kermanshah and Kurdistan provinces. AOE2 is the richest area of endemism, which harbors 10 species of all Iranian Onosma endemics. All species in AOE1 present in this area except O. asperrima and O. chrysochaeta. In addition, there are five local endemic species named O. iranshahrii Ghahreman et Attar, O. bisotunensis Attar et Hamzeh'ee, O. sheidaii, O. sanandajensis and O. marivanensis in this area. AOE3 occupies most of the Central Alborz region. This area is located in
the provinces of Alborz, Tehran and Mazandaran. AOE3 is influenced by four endemic species, i. e. O. pachypoda, O. gaubae, O. chrysochaeta and O. kilouyense. In this area, there are two endemic species of Alborz, namely O. pachypoda and O. gaubae. The northernmost area, named AOE4, is located in the provinces of Ardabil and West Azarbaijan. This area is defined by influence from four endemic species: O. chrysochaeta, O. ilabiate, O. sabalanica, and O. assadi.
Discussion
The results of the present study show that high species richness, the main areas of endemism, top-ranked IPAs, and AZE sites of this taxon are situated in the Zagros ecosystems. The Zagros mountains have been identified as important centres of species richness and areas of endemism for many important plant species in Iran (Hedge, Wendlbo, 1978), including some alpine plant species and subgroups of true subnival and nival plants in Iran (Noroozi et al., 2008, 2011), endemic trees and shrubs (Mehrabian et al., 2020) and the genus Acantholimon (Khajoei Na-sab, Khosravi, 2020). Special topographic heterogeneity, high annual rainfall, dominant Mediterranean
Fig. 4. IPA map of the genus Onosma in Iran.
pluviseasonal-continental (Djmali et al., 2011) in Za-gros have led to high plant diversity and the creation of various habitats including oak forests, shrubs and grasslands and other types of habitats. The existence of these diverse habitats across the high mountain range has led to an increase in species richness and the number of local endemic species of this genus such as O. mozaffariani Mehrabian and O. sheidaii Mehrabian. In addition, three top-ranked IPAs and one area of endemism are located in the central Alborz region. The Central Alborz ecosystems, including important centers of speciation and endemism in Iran (Hedge, Wendlbo, 1978). This pattern corresponds well with the Alborz distribution pattern of endemism of montane/Alpine area of Irano-Toura-nian region (Hedge, Wendlbo, 1978; Noroozi et al., 2008, 2011, 2018; Khajoei Nasab, Khosravi, 2020). As well as one IPA and area of endemism have been
identified in Ardebil province. Northwest Iran is an important center of speciation of plants in the country which is considered as the Atropatanean province of Irano-Turanian region. This area is located in the intersection of the Alborz, the Zagros and the Caucasus mountain ranges. In addition, mentioned area covers two different bioclimatic zones following Mediterranean xeric-continental (Mxc) and Mediterranean pluviseasonal-oceanic (Mpo) (Dajmali et al., 2011), so mentioned conditions created special habitats for various of the endemic species of Onosma such as O. sabalanica Ponet. as well as the Aste-raceae family (Noroozi et al., 2018). The comparison of the four approaches used in this study (IPAs, AZE sites, GIE, and Species Richness) shows that the IPAs and GIE techniques have succeeded in identifying the most important centres of diversity and en-demism of Onosma in Iran. The highest species rich-
kilometers
Fig. 5. AZE map of the genus Onosma in Iran.
Fig. 6. Comparison of the map of protected areas of Iran and IPAs, AZE.
Fig. 7. Areas of endemism of Onosma in Iran, identified using GIE.
ness is associated with the highest IPAs index that occurred in Dalahu county. However, in a number of top-ranked IPAs, IPAs index does not show correlation with species richness (see IPAs and richness maps) due to the presence of grid with the high species index or presence of important habitats in some cells with lower species richness. Also by examining IPAs, AZE sites, total species richness and endemic species richness maps reveal that endemic species or endangered and critically endangered species don't necessarily exist where the total number of species is greater, so it is natural that the high IPAs index is not associated with the high richness index in some cells. Some studies in this field have the same result. For example, a study done on bryophyte diversity in the Peneda-Geres National Park (Portugal) indicated
that high species richness associated with high IPAs index, but this does not apply to all grid cells (Sergio et al., 2012). Species richness is a key criterion in biogeographical studies and conservation strategies but alone is not enough to provide a comprehensive assessment of plant diversity.
Conclusion
According to the findings of this research, we suggest that all the areas marked with these four approaches should be protected. We consider that this genus with a high percentage of endemic species is one of the most important genera of Iranian flora and only 46 % of the IPAs and areas of endemism specified in the research are located in protected
areas, therefore, identification and protection of these areas are one of the most prevalent conservation planning. Finally, we suggest that plant protection research can not only be based on one approach and a new combination of quantitative methods should be used for conservation planning in the flora of Iran.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to A. Nemati, S. Naghizadeh, M. J. Nikjouyan, and H. Moradi for their help in conducting field studies.
REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Al-Abbasi T. M., Al-Farhan A., Al-Kuhlaidi A.W., Hall M., Llewellyn O. A., Miller A. G., Patzelt A. 2010. Important Plant Areas in the Arabian Peninsula. Edinb. J. Bot. 67(1): 25-35. DOI: 10.1017/S0960428609990217
Almasi M., Ranjbar, M. 2015. Onosma maculata sp. nov. (Boraginaceae) from Iran. Nord. J. Bot. 33: 522-525. DOI: 10.1111/njb.00614
Anderson S. 2002. Identifying Important Plant Areas: a site selection manual for Europe. In: Plantlife. URL: https:// www.plantlife.org.uk/uk/our-work/publications/identifying-important-plant-areas-site-selection-manual-europe.
Attar F., Sotoodeh A., Mirtadzadini M. 2020. Four new species in subsection Asterotricha for the genus Onosma L. (Boraginaceae) from flora of Iran. Feddes Repert. 131: 146-158. DOI: 10.1002/fedr.202000005
Barthlott W., Hostert A., Kier G., Küper W., Kreft H., Mutke J., Rafiqpoor M. D., Sommer J. H. 2007. Geographic patterns of vascular plant diversity at continental to global scales. Erdkunde 61: 305-315. DOI: 10.3112/ erdkunde.2007.04.01
Buchman A. S., Leurgans S. E., Boyle P. A., Schneide R. J. A., Arnold S. E., Bennett D. A. 2011. Combinations of motor measures more strongly predict adverse health outcomes in old age: The rush memory and aging project, a community-based cohort study. BMC Medicine 9: 42.
CecchiL., Coppi A., Selvi F. 2016. Onosma juliae (Boraginaceae), a new species from southern Turkey, with remarks on the systematics of Onosma in the Irano-Turanian region. Phytotaxa 288: 201-213. DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.288.3.1.
Dagher-Kharrat M. B., El Zein H., Rouhan G. 2018. Setting conservation priorities for Lebanese flora -identification of important plant areas. J. Nat. Conserv. 43: 85-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.11.004
Djamali M., Akhani H., Khoshravesh R., Andrieu-Ponel V., Ponel P., Brewer S. 2011. Application of the Global Bioclimatic Classification to Iran: implications for understanding the modern vegetation and biogeography. Ecol. Mediterr. 37: 91-114.
Gaston K. J. 1996. Species richness: measure and measurement. In: K. J. Gaston (ed.). Biodiversity: biology of numbers and difference. Oxford: Blackwell Science. Pp. 77-113.
Hedge I.C., Wendelbo P. 1978. Patterns of distribution and endemism in Iran. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 36: 441-464.
Jian-ChangN., Yi-Zhen X., Yu-LongZ. 1995. A comparative palynological study on the Maharanga and Onosma (Boraginaceae). Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 33(1): 52-57.
Khatamsaz M. 2002. Boraginaceae. In: M. Assadi, A. A. Maassoumi, M. Khatamsaz (eds.). Flora of Iran. Tehran: Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. Pp. 114-167.
Khajoei Nasab F., Khosavi A. R. 2020. Identification of the areas of endemism (AOEs) of the genus Acantholimon (Plumbaginaceae) in Iran. Plant Biosyst. 154: 726-736. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2019.1686078
Khajoei Nasab F., Mehrabian A. R., Nemati A. 2020a. Taxonomic revision of the Onosma gaubae sensu lato (Boraginaceae) based on morphological and ecological analysis. Plant Biosyst. 155: 1019-1031. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2020.1813827
Khajoei Nasab F., Mehrabian A.R., Mostafavi H. 2020b. Mapping the current and future distributions of Onosma species endemic to Iran. J. Arid Land 12: 1031-1045. DOI: 10.1007/s40333-020-0080-z
Kier G., Kreft H., Lee T. M., Jetz W., Ibisch P. L., Nowicki C., Mutke J., Barthlott W. 2009. A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 106: 9322-7. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810306106
Langhammer P. F., Bakarr M. I., Bennun L., Brooks T. M., et al. 2007. Identification and gap analysis of key biodiversity areas: targets for comprehensive protected area systems. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Ser. 15. xiv. 116 pp. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2006.PAG.15.en
Lawton J. H., Prendergast J. R., Eversham B. C. 1994. The numbers and spatial distribution of species: analyses of British data. In: P. L. Forey, C. J. Humphries, R. I. Vane-Wright (eds.). Systematics and Conservation Evaluation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pp. 177-195.
Lovett J. R., Rudd S., Taplin J., Frimodt-Moller C. 2000. Patterns of plant diversity in Africa south of the Sahara and their implications for conservation management. Biodivers. Conserv. 9: 37-46. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008956529695
Marignani M., Bacchetta G., Bagella S., Caria M.C., Delogu F., Farris E., Fenu G., Filigheddu R., Blasi C. 2014. Is time on our side? Strengthening the link between field efforts and conservation needs. Biodivers. Conserv. 23: 421-431. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-013-0610-5
McAllister D. E., Schueler F. W., Roberts C. M., Hawkins J. P. 1994. Mapping and GIS analysis of the global distribution of coral reef fishes on an equal-area grid. In: R. I. Miller (ed.). Mapping the diversity of nature. London: Chapman & Hall. Pp. 155-75.
McNeely J. A., Miller K. R., Reid W. V., Mittermeier R. A., Werner T. B. 1990. Conserving the World's Biological Diversity. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. World Resources Institute, Conservation International, WWF-US and the World Bank: Washington, D.C. DOI: 10.5860/choice.28-3288
Mehrabian A. R. 2015. Distribution patterns and diversity of Onosma in Iran: with emphasis on endemism conservation and distribution pattern in SW Asia. Rostaniha 16: 36-60. DOI: 10.22092/BOTANY.2015.101996
Mehrabian A, Amini Rad M. 2018. Onosma moussavi sp. nov. (Boraginaceae) from Zagros Mountain (s), Iran. Feddes Repert. 29: 304-311. DOI: 10.1002/fedr.201700020
Mehrabian A., Mozaffarian V. 2018. Seven New Species of Onosma L. (Boraginaceae) with emphasis on their habitats in Iran. Taiwania 4: 366-388. DOI: 10.6165/tai.2018.63.366.
Mehrabian A. R., Naghizadeh S., Khajoei Nasab F., Moradi Zeinab H., Mozaffarian V. 2022a. Two new species and a new record for Onosma L. (Boraginaceae) from northwestern Iran. Feddes Repert. DOI: 10.1002/fedr.202000036 Mehrabian A. R., Mozaffarian V., Naghizadeh S. 2022b. Four new species of Onosma (Boraginaceae) from Iran, an important center of diversity of the genus in the world. Collectanea Botanica 41: e003. DOI: 10.3989/collectbot.2022. v41.003
Meusel H., Jäger E., Rauschert S., Weinert E. 1978. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora-KartenBand II. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag. 421 pp.
Moradi Zeinab H., Mehrabian A. R., Naghizadeh S., Mostafavi H., Khajoi Nasab F. 2019. Distribution patterns, diversity and conservation priorities of Onosma L. (Boraginaceae Juss.) in some sections of the northwestern geomorphologic unit of Iran. Environmental Sciences 17: 73-94.
Morrone J. J. 1994. On the identification of areas of endemism. Syst. Biol. 43: 438-441. DOI: 101093/sysbio/433438 Mutke J., Barthlott W. 2005. Patterns of vascular plant diversity at continental to global scales. Biologiske Skrifter 55: 521-537.
Myers N. 1990. The biodiversity challenge: expanded hotspots analysis. The Environmentalist 10: 243-256. DOI: 10.1007/BF02239720
Noroozi J., Akhani H., Breckle S-W. 2008. Biodiversity and phytogeography of the Alpine flora of Iran. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 493-521. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-007-9246-7
Noroozi J. Pauli H., Grabherr G., Breckle S-W. 2011. The subnival-nival vascular plant species of Iran: a unique high-mountain flora and its threat from climate warming. Biodivers. Conserv. 20: 1319-1338. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-011-0029-9
Noroozi J., Talebi A., Doostmohammadi M., Rumpf S. B., Linder H. P., Schneeweiss G. M. 2018. Hotspots within a global biodiversity hotspot - areas of endemism are associated with high mountain ranges. Sci. Rep. 8: 10345. DOI: 101038/s41598-018-28504-9
Oliveira U., Brescovit A. D., Santos A. J. 2015. Delimiting Areas of Endemism through Kernel Interpolation. PLoS ONE 10(1): e0116673. DOI: 101371/ journalpone0116673
Popov M. G. 1950. O primenenii botaniko-geograficheskogo metoda v systematike rasteniy. Problemy botaniki I: 70-108. [In Russian] (Попов М. Г. О применении ботанико-географического метода в систематике растений // Проблемы ботаники, 1950. Т. 1. С. 70-108).
Popov M. G. 1974. Onosma L. In: B. K. Shiskin (ed.). Flora of the U.S.S.R. Vol. 19. Tubiflorae. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House. Pp. 136-171.
Riedl H. 1967. Boraginaceae. In: K. H. Rechinger (ed.). Flora Iranica 48. Graz: Akademische Druck-u Verlagsanstalt. Pp. 169-212.
Roozitalab M. H., Siadat H., Farshad A. 2018. The Soils of Iran. Switzerland: Springer. 255 pp. Sapir Y., Shmida A., Fragman O. 2003. Constructing red numbers for setting conservation priorities of endangered plant species: Israeli flora as a test case. J. Nat. Conserv. 11: 91-107. DOI: 101078/ 1617-1381-00041
Selvi F. 1997. Rare plants on mount Aiata, Italy: vulnerability to extinction on an ecological "Island". Biol. Cons. 81: 257-266. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00155-3
Sérgio C., Garcia C.A., Hespanhol H., Vieira C., Stow S., Long D. 2012. Bryophyte diversity in the Peneda- Gerês National Park (Portugal): selecting Important Plant Areas (IPA) based on a new survey and past records. Botánica Complutensis 36: 39-50.
Szumik C., GoloboffP. A. 2004. Areas of endemism: an improved optimality criterion. Syst. Biol. 53: 968-977. DOI: 101080/10635150490888859
Thiers B. 2019. Index herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. URL: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih (Accessed 15 January 2022).
Wilcove D. S. 1989. Protecting biodiversity in multiple-use lands: lessons from the US Forest Service. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 385-388. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90108-0
Zemskova E. A., Popova T. N. 1991. The palynomorphological investigation of the genus Onosma (Boraginaceae). Bot. Zhurn. 76(9): 1279-1291. [In Russian] (Земскова Е. А., Попова Т. Н. Палиноморфологическое исследование рода Onosma (Boraginaceae) // Бот. журн., 1991. Т. 76, № 9. С. 1279-1291).
Supplementary
The list of species that satisfy criterion A or SP_ index was based on three arbitrary scale: I. IUCN red list of species. II. Rarity III. Endemism.
Species IUCN Rarity Endemism Endemism The RI
score score score chorology extent of occurrence (EOO)
Onosma albo-rosea Fisch. et C. A. Mey. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.1
Onosma ambigens Lacaita 1 2 0 0 VU 0.5
Onosma armena DC. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.09
Onosma asperrima Bornm. 0 0 1 3 LC 0.07
Onosma assadi Mehrabian et Mozaff. 2 2 3 1 EN 0.5
Onosma azarbaidjanensis Mehrabian. 2 2 3 1 EN 1
Onosma bakhteganensis Mozaff. et Mehrabian 2 2 3 1 EN 0.5
Onosma bilabiata Boiss. 0 1 2 2 LC 0.14
Onosma bisotunensis Attar et Hamzeh'ee 2 2 3 1 EN 0.5
Onosma bodeana Boiss. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.08
Onosma bulbotricha DC. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.03
Onosma caerulescens Boiss. 1 2 0 0 VU 0.5
Onosma cardiostegia Bornm 0 1 0 0 LC 0.12
Onosma chlorotrichaBoiss. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.07
Onosma chrysochaeta Bornm. 1 1 2 2 VU 0.33
Onosma cornuta H. Riedl. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.07
Onosma dasytricha Boiss. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.05
Onosma demawendica Riedl 1 1 3 1 VU 0.25
Onosma dichroantha Boiss. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.04
Onosma elwendica Wettst. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.03
Onosma gaubae Bornm. 2 2 3 1 EN 0.5
Onosma hebebulba DC. 0 1 0 0 LC 0.16
Onosma iranshahrii Ghahreman et Attar 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma kerendica Attar et Mirtadz. 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma khorassanica Attar et Joharchi 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma khorramabadensis Attar, Mirtadz. et 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Sotoodeh
Onosma kilouyense Boiss. et Hausskn. 0 0 2 2 LC 0.05
Onosma kotschyi Boiss. 0 0 1 3 LC 0.06
Onosma kurdica Teppner. 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma longiloba Bge. 1 1 0 0 VU 0.16
Onosma lorestanica Attar et Sotoodeh 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma macrophylla Bornm. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.05
Onosma maculate Ranjbar et Almasi 0 1 3 1 LC 0.12
Species IUCN Rarity Endemism Endemism The RI
score score score chorology extent of occurrence (EOO)
Onosma marivanensis Mozaff. et Mehrabian 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma microcarpa DC. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.02
Onosma mousavi Mehrabian et Amini Rad 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma mozaffariani Mehrabian. 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma nervosa H. Riedl. 1 1 0 0 VU 0.16
Onosma olivieri Boiss. 1 1 0 0 VU 0.25
Onosma pachypoda Boiss. 0 0 3 1 LC 0.07
Onosma platyphylla H. Riedl. 0 1 3 1 LC 0.12
Onosma rascheyana Boiss. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.07
Onosma rostellata Lehm. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.08
Onosma sabalanica Ponert. 2 2 3 1 EN 0.5
Onosma sahandica Attar et Sotoodeh 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma sanandajensis Mehrabian et Mozaff. 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma sarvestanica Mozaff. et Mehrabian 2 2 3 1 EN 0.5
Onosma sericea Willd. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.03
Onosma sheidaii Mehrabian. 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma stenosiphon Boiss. 0 0 0 0 LC 0.04
Onosma straussii Riedl Khatamsaz 0 0 1 3 LC 0.08
Onosma subsericeaFreyn 0 1 0 0 LC 0.16
Onosma targevarensis Mozaff. et Mehrabian 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma wendelboi Mehrabian et Mozaff. 3 2 3 1 CR 1
Onosma zagrica Dehshiri 3 2 3 1 CR 1
