CC BY
49
ISSN 2313-7347
к
о
X
го
X
0
го m го
с
01 *
© Коллектив авторов, 2016
DOI: 10.17749/2313-7347.2015.10.1.011-025
DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS
Inna Tzoran1Z3, Benjamin Brenner13
1 Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
2 Internal Medicine C, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel 3 Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
Summary
Several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), namely, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran etexilate, are currently licensed in Europe and the United States for various thromboembolic indications. They provide alternatives to low molecular weight heparin in a peri-operative setting for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and therapy and to vitamin K antagonists for longer term therapy. Routine coagulation monitoring is not required with DOACs but is recommended in patients with renal impairment, acute bleeding, overdoses, or emergency surgery. If bleeding is life-threatening, the offlabel therapeutic use of PCC or activated PCC may be considered in an attempt to reverse the anticoagulant effect of DOACs. DOACs provide important advantages in the short-term prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery and in the longer term treatment of VTE and prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation compared with traditional agents, including reductions in dangerous bleeding types.
Key words
Direct oral anticoagulants, venous thromboembolism, anticoagulant therapy. Received: 21.01.2016; in the revised form: 15.02.2016; accepted: 29.02.2016. Conflict of interests
The authors declared that they do not have anything to disclosure regarding funding or conflict of interests with respect to this manuscript.
All authors contributed equally to this article. For citation
Tzoran I., Brenner B. Direct oral anticoagulants. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya i reproduktsiya / Obstetrics, gynecology and reproduction. 2016; 1: 11-25.
Corresponding author
Address: P.O. Box 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel.
E-mail address: [email protected] (Inna Tzoran).
ОРАЛЬНЫЕ АНТИКОАГУЛЯНТЫ ПРЯМОГО ДЕЙСТВИЯ
1зоран И.123, Бреннер Б.13
1 Отделение гематологии и трансплантации костного мозга, Медицинский городок Рамбам, Хайфа, Израиль
2 Центр внутренних болезней, Медицинский городок Рамбам, Хайфа, Израиль
3 Медицинский факультет им. Брюса Раппапорта, Технион, Хайфа, Израиль
Резюме
В настоящее время в Европе и США разрешено применение некоторых антикоагулянтов прямого действия (АКПД), а именно апиксабана, ривароксабана и дабигартана этексилата для лечения различных тромбоэмболических заболеваний. Они являются альтернативой имеющему низкий молекулярный вес гепарину при послеоперационном лечении в качестве профилактики и терапии венозной тромбоэмболии (ВТЭ), а также антагонистами вита-
мина K при более длительной терапии. При приеме АКПД не требуется планового контроля свертываемости крови, однако рекомендуется больным, страдающим почечной недостаточностью, при острых кровотечениях, передозировках или экстренной хирургии. Если кровотечение угрожает жизни, то во избежание антикоагулян-тного эффекта АКПД можно попробовать применение без показаний концентрата протромбинового комплекса или активированного протромбинового комплекса. АКПД дает важные преимущества для краткосрочной профилактики ВТЭ у пациентов, которым была сделана хирургическая замена бедра или колена, а при длительном лечении ВТЭ и для профилактики инсульта у больных с фибрилляцией желудочков по сравнению с традиционными средствами, включая снижение интенсивности опасных типов кровотечений.
Ключевые слова
Оральные антикоагулянты прямого действия, венозная тромбоэмболия, антикоагулянтная терапия. Статья поступила: 21.01.2016 г.; в доработанном виде: 15.02.2016 г.; принята к печати: 29.02.2016 г. Конфликт интересов
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии необходимости раскрытия финансовой поддержки или конфликта интересов в отношении данной публикации.
Все авторы сделали эквивалентный вклад в подготовку публикации. Для цитирования
Tзоран И., Бреннер Б. Оральные антикоагулянты прямого действия. Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция. 2016; 1: 11-25.
к
о
ь
Q
к ■
х
сс
X
0
сс m сс
с
01 о QÛ
Ó S LU CL
О m
x Й
К -О ^ Ц
CD CD ^ I-<Я
со
X
О s £ CD
о.
CD
CN
О f-JZ
m Ç?
К ^ S Q. X О
g О
° d m d
-O
О çn
5 ë
Several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), namely, apixaban [1,2], rivaroxaban [3,4], and dabigatran etexilate [5,6], are currently licensed in Europe and the United States for various thromboembolic indications. A fourth DOAC, edoxaban, has also demonstrated efficacy and safety in venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) [7,8], but is not licensed in Europe or the United States.
The DOACs have a rapid onset of action (~2 to 4 h) and a short half-life in patients with normal renal function [9,10]. They provide alternatives to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in a peri-operative setting for VTE prophylaxis and therapy and to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for longer term therapy. Since the DOACs have predictable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effects, routine coagulation monitoring for titration and maintenance is not required [11]. However, if patients experience bleeding or need procedural interventions, laboratory monitoring can be performed. The probability of their reversal to manage life-threatening bleeding is still under investigation; most anticoagulants are not acutely reversible, except for unfractionated heparin with protamine [12]. VKAs are acutely reversible with 4-component prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), including one recently approved in the United States (prothrombin complex concentrate), but there is no specific reversal agent for LMWHs, which may accumulate in patients with renal dysfunction [13]. For all anticoagulants, management protocols for potential bleeding should be established. Clinical studies of using DOACs for current indications have provided extensive safety data.
Therapeutic and bleeding profiles of DOACs in clinical studies
Apixaban
Apixaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is widely approved for thromboprophylaxis in elective hip or knee replacement surgery [1,14] and for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF (Table 1) [1,2].
ADVANCE studies compared VTE prophylaxis using apixaban, initiated 12 to 24 h postoperatively, to that with enoxaparin in elective hip/knee replacement surgery[15-17]. In ADVANCE-1, apixaban did not demonstrate non-inferiority for efficacy compared with enoxaparin at a dose of 30 mg twice daily (bid), when given after knee replacement surgery [15]. However, apixaban was superior to enoxaparin at a dose of 40 mg once daily (qd) in ADVANCE-2, when given after knee replacement surgery [16], and in ADVANCE-3 after hip replacement surgery [17]. Major bleeding and clinically relevant bleeding occurred at a similar rate in the treatment groups in these studies (Table 2) [15-17]. A randomized phase III study (AMPLIFY) compared results of acute VTE therapy with apixaban to those of using LMWH in combination with warfarin (Table 3) [18]. Overall, there was a significantly lower incidence of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding in patients treated with apixaban (4.3% vs. 9.7%; p < 0.001) [18]. A 12-month extension study (AMPLIFY-EXT) compared apixaban at a dose of 2.5 mg or 5 mg bid with placebo for the secondary prevention of recurrent VTE in patients who had already received 6 to 12 months of anticoagulation treatment [19]. A similar incidence of major bleeding was demonstrated with both doses (Table 4). Rates of clinically
к V»
à i о
X
CD T
cc
X
n cc
X
ч . ;
£ ^ cn
cc
IT
о
05
CD
Ю
x <* = S
to
d ю ^ a> ra -"t
I Ï
S ^
О. CD
О ™ О CD
m .0
т ^
о
О X
СР аЗ
i- о.
íü °
О. О
ü
s 1
S ^
ï о
http://www.gyn.su/
<в CIS
12
G
relevant bleeding were numerically higher with active treatment (3.2% and 4.3% vs. 2.7%, respectively; p values nonsignificant for all comparisons), but rates of all-cause mortality were lower (0.8% and 0.5% vs. 1.7%, respectively) [19].
Long-term use of apixaban (5 mg bid) versus acetyl-salicylic acid (ASA) and warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvu-lar AF was compared in two separate trials (AVERROES and ARISTOTLE, respectively) [20,21]. Apixaban appeared to be superior to warfarin in terms of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding (p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (p = 0.047) (Table 5). Rates of major gastrointestinal bleeding were similar in patients treated with apixaban and both comparators, and there was significantly less intracranial bleeding with apixaban compared with warfarin (0.3%/year vs. 0.8%/year; p < 0.001) [20,21].
The APPRAISE-2 study compared apixaban in combination with standard antiplatelet therapy and antiplatelet therapy alone in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [22]. However, the risk of bleeding outweighed the clinical benefit of anticoagulation in these patients, and the trial was stopped early.
Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor and is licensed in the European Union and North America for: 1) the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE); 2) the prevention of recurrent DVT and PE in adults; 3) thromboprophylaxis in adults undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery; and 4) the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adults with nonvalvular AF [3,4]. In the European Union, rivaroxaban has been approved (at a dose of 2.5 mg bid), in combination with ASA alone or ASA plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine to prevent atherothrombotic events in patients with ACS and elevated cardiac biomarkers (Table 1) [3].
The phase III RECORD program evaluated the use of rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective total hip or knee replacement surgery and consisted of 4 trials of rivaroxaban at a dose of 10 mg once daily (started 6 to 8 h after surgery) compared to two standard subcutaneous enoxaparin regimens (30 mg bid initiated after surgery and 40 mg once daily initiated before surgery) [23-26]. Rivaroxaban was found to be superior to enoxapa-rin (30 mg bid and 40 mg once a day) for VTE prevention, with a similar incidence of major bleeding (Table 2) [23-28]. However, bleeding at the surgical site was not classified as major bleeding but was included as part of a composite of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding. In a pooled analysis of the 4 trials, major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding occurred more frequently with riva-roxaban than with enoxaparin over the total treatment duration (3.2% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.04) but not during the 12 ± 2 days of active treatment (2.9% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.19) [29].
Three phase III randomized studies of rivaroxaban in the VTE treatment setting were conducted [30,31]. In the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE trials, rivaroxaban was
non-inferior to standard enoxaparin/VKA therapy in patients who had acute DVT (without PE) [30] and PE (with or without DVT) [31], respectively. In the EINSTEIN EXT, extended rivaroxaban treatment was superior to placebo for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients already successfully treated for an initial VTE and for whom the benefit-risk balance of continuing or stopping treatment was unclear
[30]. In the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN EXT studies, no significant difference in major bleeding between rivaroxaban and the comparator regimen was revealed (Tables 3 and 4); however, in the EINSTEIN PE, rivaroxaban treatment led to a significant (51%) relative risk reduction in major bleeding compared with enoxaparin/VKA (Table 3)
[31]. In both acute treatment studies, major bleeding in a critical site, associated with a decrease in hemoglobin of >2 g/dl and/or transfusion of >2 units of blood, or leading to death, occurred with an incidence of <1% in the rivaroxaban arms [30,31]. In the EINSTEIN PE, there were fewer cases of major bleeding at a critical site, especially intra-cranial and retroperitoneal bleeding, with rivaroxaban than with enoxaparin/VKA [31].
Further data on the long-term use of rivaroxaban 20 mg once a day were provided by the ROCKET AF study, in which rivaroxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF, and rivaroxaban did not increase the rate of clinically relevant bleeding (14.9%/year vs. 14.5%/year; p = 0.44) (Table 5) [32]. Rivaroxaban was associated with significant reductions in the annual rates of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (0.5% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.02), critical site bleeding (0.8% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.007), and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.003) compared with warfarin, set against an increase in gastrointestinal bleeding (3.2% vs. 2.2%; p < 0.001), major bleeding associated with a >2 g/dl decrease in hemoglobin (2.8% vs. 2.3%; p = 0.02), and major bleeding requiring blood transfusion (1.6% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.04) (Table 5) [32].
In the ATLAS ACS-2 TIMI 51 study, rivaroxaban (2.5 mg or 5 mg bid) in combination with standard antiplatelet therapy (ASA with or without a thienopyridine) was compared with antiplatelet therapy alone in patients with recent ACS [33]. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the incidence of death of cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke (p = 0.008 across both doses compared with antiplatelet therapy alone), but also led to a significant increase in major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass grafting (2.1% vs. 0.6%, respectively; p < 0.001) and in ICH (0.6% vs. 0.2%, respectively; p = 0.009). However, the incidence of fatal bleeding was not significantly elevated (0.3% vs. 0.2%, respectively; p = 0.66). Overall, rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg bid was associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared with the higher (5 mg bid) dose (0.1% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.04). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not approved the use of rivaroxaban in patients with ACS.
Edoxaban
Edoxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that is not yet licensed in Europe or the United States (Table 1). Edoxa-
X
TO
a X o
TO m cc a c
ai *
13 i
ban was compared with LMWH/warfarin for the treatment of VTE in the randomized phase III Hokusai-VTE study [8]. Patients in both treatment arms received heparin induction at the start of treatment. Edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of recurrent symptomatic VTE and led to a significantly lower incidence of major plus non-major clinically relevant bleeding (p = 0.004) (Table 3) [8]. Similar incidence of major bleeding was observed in both treatment arms (1.4% vs. 1.6%; p = 0.35), and fatal bleeding occurred in 2 patients in the edoxaban arm compared with 10 in the warfarin arm. There were no fatal intracranial or retroperitoneal bleeding events with edoxaban, and fewer nonfatal bleeding episodes in a critical site compared with warfarin (0.3% vs. 0.6%, including 5 vs. 12 nonfatal ICHs) [8].
The efficacy and safety of edoxaban for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF was evaluated in the Engage AF-TIMI 48 study (Table 5) [7]. Edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin in terms of the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism. Major bleeding occurred with a significantly lower incidence with both edoxaban doses compared with warfarin (1.6% and 2.8%/year, respectively, vs. 3.4%/year; p < 0.001 for both doses) (Table 5) [7]. The endpoint of death or ICH also occurred in significantly fewer patients receiving edoxaban than warfarin (4.0% and 4.3%/year, respectively, vs. 4.9%/year; p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Of note, fatal bleeding (0.1% and 0.2%/year vs. 0.4%/year; p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) and life-threatening bleeding (0.3% and 0.4%/year vs. 0.8%/year; p < 0.001 for both doses) were significantly less frequent with edoxaban, as was gastrointestinal bleeding with the lower dose (0.8% vs. 1.2%/year; p < 0.001). In contrast, the higher edoxaban dose led to more gastrointestinal bleeding than warfarin (1.5% vs. 1.2%/year; p = 0.03) [7].
Dabigatran
Dabigatran is a direct factor IIa (thrombin) inhibitor and is approved in Europe for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement, in the United States for VTE treatment, and in Europe and North America for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF (Table 1) [5,6].
RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II were non-inferiority studies comparing dabigatran 150 mg or 220 mg once a day (starting with a half-dose 1 to 4 h after surgery) with enoxaparin 40 mg once a day (initiated before surgery) for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip replacement [34,35]. The same doses were also studied after knee replacement surgery in the RE-MODEL and the RE-MOBILIZE [36,37]. In these studies, the rates of major bleeding were similar (Table 2) [34-37].
The use of dabigatran for acute treatment of VTE was studied in the RE-COVER and the RE-COVER II [38,39]. All patients received initial parenteral anticoagulation. In both trials, dabigatran was non-inferior to standard care, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding (Table 3) [38,39]. In the RE-COVER, there
were no cases of ICH with dabigatran, but approximately one-fourth of all bleeding events associated with dabiga-tran were gastrointestinal. Two further studies considered the potential role of dabigatran as a long-term therapy for the prevention of recurrent VTE after patients had received initial treatment for a primary event. Dabigatran was found to be non-inferior to warfarin in the RE-MEDY trial and superior to placebo in the RE-SONATE trial for the prevention of recurrent VTE [40]. Only 2 major bleeding events occurred with dabigatran in the RE-SONATE (Table 4), and there were numerically fewer incidences of major bleeding with dabigatran than with warfarin in the RE-MEDY, including major bleeding in a critical organ, causing a decrease in hemoglobin, or requiring a blood transfusion. However, there was a greater incidence of ACS in patients taking dabigatran than in those receiving warfarin (0.9% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.02).
The profile of long-term dabigatran therapy has been further defined by the RE-LY study (Table 5), in which 110-mg and 150-mg bid doses were compared with standard warfarin therapy for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF [41]. The lower dabigatran dose was non-inferior for efficacy to warfarin in this trial, and the higher dose was superior. The 110-mg dose of dabigatran conferred a significantly lower rate of major bleeding, and the 150-mg dose had a similar rate of major bleeding compared with warfarin (2.7% vs. 3.1% vs. 3.4%/year; p = 0.003 and p = 0.31, respectively). Both doses significantly reduced intracranial and life-threatening bleeding, but the higher dabigatran dose was associated with a higher rate of gastrointestinal bleeding (Table 5) and a slight increase in the rate of myocardial infarction compared with warfarin [41]. In RELY-ABLE, a long- term extension study, patients randomized to dabigatran in the RE-LY, who had not permanently discontinued treatment, continued to receive dabigatran. Rates of major bleeding remained similar to those in the RE-LY, with the lower dose associated with a significantly lower risk than the higher dose (3.7% vs. 3.0%/year, respectively; hazard ratio: 1.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.53). There was no significant difference between the doses in the risk of life-threatening, fatal, gastrointestinal, or intracranial bleeding (Table 5) [42].
Bleeding risk in patients treated with DOACs
Based on data from phase III studies, DOACs may be expected to be associated with a risk of clinically relevant bleeding similar to that of standard anticoagulants. The rate of major bleeding is also generally similar; however, in clinical trials using apixaban for VTE treatment and riva-roxaban for PE treatment, a significant (69% and 51%) relative risk reduction in major bleeding compared to standard therapy has been demonstrated [18,31]. When used for extended periods for the prevention of stroke, DOACs were also associated with clinically important reductions in major bleeding compared with warfarin, including life-threatening bleeding types [7,21,32,41].
o
I-2 k ■
x
TO
a X o
TO m cc a ¡z
CD
o m
d s
LO CL
O m
x d
K -O
^ m
CD CD ^ ICC
q:
CO
x
o s
£ CD
a.;;
CD
CN
O f-JZ
CO ??
s a X o
5 O
° d
co d .0
O cn
n
6 i o
X
CD T
cc
X
CO
cc
X
^ .;
£
cn
cc
IT
o
c;
05
CD
= S
tO X d m ^ a>
I Í
Q. CD
O ™ O CD
m
-O
T
c; o
O X
CP <ü
I- a
£ °
a. a
ü
s 1
s ^
S o
o
Approximately a 50%-reduction in ICH, a major complication associated with long-term warfarin use [43], is notable. This may be related to lower suppression of thrombin generation with DOACs compared with warfarin [44] and possibly, tissue factor-dependent mechanisms. However, there may also be an increase in other types of bleeding compared with warfarin, such as gastrointestinal hemorrhage [7,32,38,41].
Certain patient groups are at increased risk of bleeding and therefore require careful assessment of the benefit-risk balance of anticoagulant treatment, particularly if continued for a long period. When bleeding occurs in patients treated with a DOAC, knowledge of the pharma-cokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the agent concerned is important to inform clinical management. Apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran all reach maximal concentrations between 1 and 4 h after intake and have relatively short half-lives, ranging from 5 to 17 h in healthy subjects [1-6,45] (Table 1), which contrasts with the long half-life of warfarin (~40 h) [46]. However, drug elimination may be prolonged owing to specific factors, the most important of which are the renal clearance profiles of the patient and the drug. Dabigatran is mostly removed through the kidneys (~80% of a dose is recoverable as unchanged drug in the urine) [47] and may therefore accumulate in patients with renal insufficiency, whereas rivaroxaban [48,49] and apixaban [50] are less affected to a clinically relevant degree by moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] 30 to 49 ml/min): ~33% of rivaroxaban is cleared as active drug by renal mechanisms [3,4]; 25% to 28% of apixaban is cleared by renal elimination (Table 1) [1,2]. Severe renal impairment (CrCl, 15 to 29 ml/min) leads to a doubling of the half-life of dabigatran [51]. Edoxaban has an intermediate profile, with 50% of the dose undergoing renal elimination [52].
Patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl, 30 to 49 ml/min) who are receiving rivaroxaban for VTE treatment do not require dose adjustment, although in Europe, a dose of 15 mg once daily after the initial 3 weeks of 15-mg bid dosing may be considered based on clinical evaluation of the risk of thrombosis and bleeding [3]. In contrast, patients with AF and moderate renal impairment who receive rivaroxaban for stroke prevention should always receive a 15-mg qd dose (Table 1). In Europe, caution is recommended in all patients with severe renal insufficiency (CrCl, 15 to 29 ml/min); in the United States, rivaroxaban is not recommended in these patients [3,4]. Apixaban is given at a reduced dose for the prevention of stroke in some patients with AF (Table 1) [1,2]. Reduction of dabigatran dose should be considered for patients with AF, renal impairment and those receiving co-medications with an interaction potential (Table 1). Dabigatran is contraindicated in patients with CrCl 15-29 ml/min in Europe but may be used with caution in these patients in the United States at a reduced dose [5,6]. No DOAC should be used in patients with CrCl <15 ml/min. Recommendations for edoxaban, if and when approved in North America
or Europe, remain to be determined, but a dose reduction was mandated in the Hokusai-VTE and Engage AF-TIMI 48 studies for certain patients (Table 1) [7,8].
Hepatic impairment is also known to increase the risk of bleeding. Moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B) affects the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban and apixaban (but not of dabigatran) to a clinically relevant degree [1,2,53,54], and severe hepatic impairment would be expected to lead to a substantial increase in bleeding risk with any anticoagulant. Rivaroxaban is contraindicated in patients with hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy and clinically relevant bleeding risk, including cirrhotic patients with Child-Pugh B or C [3,4]. Apixaban can be used with caution in patients with Child-Pugh B [1,2], whereas any liver impairment expected to affect survival is a contraindication to dabigatran [5,6]. In Japan, caution is advised when using edoxaban in patients with severe hepatic impairment [55].
Interactions with concomitant drugs that share the elimination pathways of an anticoagulant may also serve to increase exposure and thus trigger a bleeding episode. The DOACs have a considerably lower potential for drug-drug interactions than VKAs [9], but there are relevant interactions. Apixaban and rivaroxaban are metabolized mainly via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-dependent and P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-dependent pathways [1,2,49], and bleeding may be caused by the use of co-medications that interact strongly with both these pathways. This is of greatest clinical relevance with strong inhibitors of both CYP3A4 and P-gp, such as azole-antimycotics (e.g., keto-conazole) and human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors (e.g., ritonavir) [49]. Neither Apixaban [1,2] nor rivaroxaban [3,4] should be co-administered with these drugs (Table 1). Strong inhibitors of one pathway or moderate inhibitors of both had a lesser effect that was not considered clinically relevant [1,2,49], but their concomitant use in patients with renal impairment could still lead to relevant pharmacodynamic effects. Strong CYP3A4 inducers should also be used with caution or avoided with rivaroxaban and apixaban. In contrast, neither dabigatran nor its prodrug, dabigatran etexilate, is metabolized by CYP-dependent mechanisms [5,6]. However, both are P-gp substrates [5,6], and the effect of strong P-gp inhibitors on the bioavailability of dabigatran could be greater than with rivaroxaban and apixaban. Less than 4% of an edoxaban dose is subject to CYP3A4-dependent clearance, which may allow its use in patients taking concomitant medications that would preclude use of rivaroxaban or apixaban [52]. Unlike with VKAs, food interactions with DOACs are minimal and not likely to cause overexposure. Rivaroxaban doses of 15 mg and 20 mg should be taken with food (Table 1) [56,57]. There was a modest effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of edoxaban when taken with food, but this is not expected to be of clinical relevance [58].
In patients with AF who are receiving long-term anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention, ACS or VTE may develop, the latter perhaps owing to poor warfarin control.
X
TO
a X o
TO m cc a ¡z
<D
5
For the former, unless the event is immediately life-threatening (e.g., massive PE requiring thrombolysis or embo-lectomy), such patients can be transitioned to rivaroxaban (as the only DOAC approved for VTE treatment in the European Union and the United States) at the initial 15-mg bid dose [3,4]. During the initial 3-week 15-mg bid dosing period with rivaroxaban, patients should be monitored closely for signs of bleeding, although in the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE trials, there was no increase in major bleeding compared with enoxaparin/VKA during this phase [30,31]. If rivaroxaban is used in patients taking antiplatelet agents for AF, an increase in bleeding risk is likely; this may be particularly important because patients with AF are generally elderly and may have renal impairment or other comorbidities and/or be taking medications that interact with rivaroxaban to increase exposure. If the benefit-risk profile is favorable, rivaroxaban may be combined with doses of ASA not exceeding 100 mg/day [59], but dual-antiplatelet therapy should not be combined with rivaroxaban in patients with AF. In contrast, a low dose of rivaroxaban may now be combined with single- or dual-antiplatelet therapy in Europe for patients with recent ACS, if they have elevated cardiac biomarkers indicating a likely secondary event [3]. The approved dose of rivaroxa-ban (2.5 mg bid) in ACS is much lower than that in other indications. In patients without elevated biomarkers, the addition of anticoagulation to antiplatelet treatment cannot be justified because of the significant increase in risk of major bleeding, as observed in the APPRAISE-2 [22] and ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51 [33] trials. Rivaroxaban is not approved for patients with both AF and ACS.
Monitoring anticoagulation with the DOACs
Routine coagulation monitoring is not required with DOACs but is recommended in patients with renal impairment, acute bleeding, overdoses, or emergency surgery [10]. The interval between the last dose and sampling must be considered when interpreting the test results. Rivaroxaban prolongs the prothrombin time (PT), with substantial inter-assay variability [60]. The PT provides a qualitative indication of the anticoagulant effect but does not measure drug levels. The international normalized ratio (INR) should not be used for rivaroxaban [60] or for other direct factor Xa inhibitors [61]. Specific anti-factor Xa assays, distinct from LMWH testing, are recommended for quantitative measurements of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and likely for edoxaban (Table 6) [60,61].
Dabigatran prolongs most coagulation assays except PT [62]. A normal thrombin time assay can be used to exclude a clinically relevant dabigatran effect and is better for this purpose than the activated partial thromboplastin time, although the dilute thrombin time assay HEMOCLOT (Aniara, West Chester, Ohio) better correlates with plasma concentrations and is more sensitive for dabiga-tran (Table 6) [63]. The ecarin clotting time test provides a dose-dependent correlation with dabigatran [64] but is not widely available.
Reversal of DOACs anticoagulation
RE-VERSE study demonstrated that 5 g of idaruci-zumab, immediately reversed the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in patients requiring urgent anticoagulant reversal [87]. No safety concerns relating to idaruci-zumab were identified. Idarucizumab is a humanized antibody fragment, or Fab, designed as a specific reversal agent to dabigatran. Idarucizumab binds specifically to dabigatran molecules only, neutralizing their anticoagulant effect without interfering with the coagulation cascade.
Specific agents, andexanet alfa, for reversal of anti Xa inhibitors are still under development. The molecule is a recombinant protein analog of factor Xa that binds to direct factor Xa inhibitors and antithrombin but does not itself have any catalytic activity.
Peri-procedural management
DOACs have a faster onset/offset of action than VKAs and can theoretically be stopped closer to the time of surgery [10]. Rivaroxaban may be stopped up to 24 h before surgery, according to European and U.S. prescribing recommendations [3,4]. A general principle is that pre-procedural DOAC discontinuation should be based on the specific pharmacokinetics, renal function, and procedural bleeding risk; post-procedural DOAC resumption should be based on bleeding risk and the fact that adequate hemostasis has been achieved [65].
Recommendations suggest stopping DOACs ~24 h (2 to 3 half-lives) before a procedure that carries a low bleeding risk, but 5 days before with a medium- or high-bleeding risk intervention, dependending on the DOAC and the patient's renal function [66,67]. The European Heart Rhythm Association suggests stopping DOACs >24 h before surgery for low-risk procedures and >48 h before high-risk surgery, but the interval should be longer for patients with CrCl <80 ml/min receiving dabigatran and for those with CrCl 15 to 30 ml/min who are treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban [68]. Other expert consensus documents recommend 24-48-h discontinuation windows [65]. The use of such a scheme in the RE-LY trial yielded similar rates of peri-operative bleeding/thromboembolism in warfarin- and dabigatran-treated patients [69]. Additional studies are ongoing [65].
If the patient's risk of thrombosis warrants resumption of anticoagulation after peri-procedural cessation, DOAC administration can be resumed 12 to 24 h after procedures associated with rapid and complete restoration of hemo-stasis. In general, DOACs may be resumed within 24 h for a procedure with a low risk of bleeding, and within 48-72 h for a procedure with a high risk of bleeding [65]. For procedures associated with an inability to take oral medications (e.g., post-operative intestinal ileus), bridging with either unfractionated heparin or reduced-dose LMWH may be considered before transitioning to a DOAC 48-72 h post-surgery [68]. Bridging therapy with a DOAC should otherwise be avoided, except for patients with a very high thrombotic risk [65].
K G I-2 K ■ X TO
a X o
TO m cc a c
ai o m
d s
LO CL
O m
x 13
K -O
^ m
CD 01 ^ I-TO
q:
CO
X
G S £ CD
a.;;
CD
CN
O f-^ jz
CO ??
s a X o
5 O
° d
co d .0
O cn
n
6 i o
X
CD T
cc
X
CO
cc
X
.;
£
cn
cc
IT
o
c;
05
CD
= S
to
d m ^ a>
I i
i>
Q. CD
G ™ G CD
m .0
T
c; o
G X
cp §
i- a £ °
a. a
U S 1 s ^
к
о
Interruption of DOACs and switching between anticoagulants
In the ROCKET AF study, thromboembolic events increased when patients discontinued rivaroxaban; however, temporary interruption led to low rates of stroke and major bleeding similar to those with warfarin [32,70]. Prolonged inadequate anticoagulation should be avoided if a DOAC is discontinued for reasons other than bleeding, and transitioning to another anticoagulant should be considered. The recommendation for switching to warfa-rin/VKA differs between Europe and the United States and between the factor Xa inhibitors and dabigatran. For apixa-ban and rivaroxaban in Europe, concurrent administration of the DOAC and VKA is recommended for at least 2 days and thereafter until the INR is >2.0 (tested at the trough DOAC concentration to minimize interference), after which the DOAC can be discontinued [1,3]. For dabigatran, a similar approach is recommended, but with at least 2 days of concurrent DOAC and VKA administration for patients with CrCl of 30 to 49 ml/min, and at least 3 days for those with CrCl >50 ml/min (to account for the dependence of dabigatran on renal clearance) [5]. The U.S. prescribing information suggests a different approach for apixaban and rivaroxaban of discontinuing the DOAC and starting the VKA plus a parenteral anticoagulant as bridging therapy until the INR reaches the therapeutic range [2,4]. For dabigatran, the U.S. advice is similar to that given in Europe, but with 3 days of concurrent administration of DOAC and VKA suggested for patients with CrCl >50 ml/ min, 2 days for those with CrCl of 30 to 50 ml/min, and 1 day in the case of CrCl of 15 to 30 ml/min [6]. For transition to a parenteral anticoagulant (e.g., LMWH in the case of a patient with cancer), the advice is simpler and more uniform: start the parenteral agent and discontinue the DOAC when the next dose of DOAC is scheduled [1-6]. However, for dabigatran, it may be necessary to wait 24 h before initiating the new anticoagulant in patients with CrCl <30 ml/min [5,6].
Recommended management strategies for bleeding associated with DOACs
For moderate or severe bleeding, standard hemody-namic support measures, such as fluid replacement and blood transfusion, can be applied to patients receiving DOACs, as with other anticoagulants. These include mechanical compression (e.g., severe epistaxis), surgical hemostasis with bleeding control procedures, fluid replacement and hemodynamic support, use of blood products (packed red cells, fresh frozen plasma, or platelets), and, depending on laboratory testing and other factors, cryo-precipitate or fibrinogen concentrates (1-6,52). Rivaroxa-
ban, apixaban, and, it is anticipated, edoxaban, have high protein binding; therefore, they are not dialyzable [1,2,52,71], whereas dabigatran can be partially removed by dialysis [51,72]. The use of activated charcoal can be considered in the event of an overdose, provided this is within ~6 h of ingestion. If bleeding occurs and cannot be controlled with these measures, interventions may be required. DOACs should be discontinued before a planned intervention, as discussed [3,4], although renal function is important [10], especially for patients at risk of bleeding [66,67]. In emergencies, immediate surgery may be required, and clinical judgment must be exercised. Rivaroxaban, although approved for PE therapy, should not be given to patients with hemodynamically unstable PE [3,4].
Management of life-threatening bleeding
If bleeding is life-threatening, the off-label therapeutic use of PCC or activated PCC may be considered in an attempt to reverse the anticoagulant effect of DOACs [1-6]. However, experience with these therapeutic approaches is limited to preclinical studies, which have shown variable results [73-78], and reversal of anticoagulation in healthy volunteers [79-83], as well as some case reports in patients. One study in healthy volunteers found that 3-factor PCC reversed rivaroxaban-induced changes in thrombin generation more than 4-factor PCC [84]. With ICH or serious bleeding, recommendations suggest PCC administration at 50 U/kg or activated PCC (anti-inhibitor coagulant complex) at 30 to 50 U/kg [85], which may be re-administered once if required [85]. Hemodialysis guided by measured drug concentrations should be considered for dabigatran.
As mention above, a potent monoclonal antibody directed against dabigatran, idarucizumab, is now approved for dabigatran reversal in patients with uncontrolled bleeding or those who require emergency surgery [87].
Conclusions
DOACs provide important advantages in the short-term prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery and in the longer term treatment of VTE and prevention of stroke in patients with AF compared with traditional agents, including reductions in dangerous bleeding types. However, they also have different bleeding profiles that require individualized management approaches. Further study and increasing use of apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban in real-world practice will help to familiarize physicians with best practice in this area. Development of specific measurement techniques and reversal agents will also provide further tools for the management of bleeding.
X
ro
X о
го m го œ с
ai *
00
АКУШЕРСТВО • ГИНЕКОЛОГИЯ • РЕПРОДУКЦИЯ
2016 • Том 10 • № 1
Anticoagulant Target Approved Indications* Onset of Action (t > h) v max' ' V h Offset of Action, h Method of Excretion Food Effect Drug Interactions Dose Adjustments
Apixaban Factor Xa VTE prevention in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery (2.5 mg bid).* Prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF (5 mg bid) 3-4 -12 24-48 Hepatobiliary: 73%Active renal secretion: 27% None Avoid strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors** Caution with strong CYP3A4 inducers Stroke prevention: 2.5 mg bid in patients with at least 2 of the following: age >80 yrs, weight <60 kg, serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl or >133 |jmol/l,* or receiving strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors*** In patients already taking 2.5-mg bid dose, avoid strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors***
Rivaroxaban Factor Xa VTE prevention in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery (10 mg qd) Prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF (20 mg qd)Treatment of DVT/PE and prevention of recurrent VTE (15 mg bid for 21 days, then 20 mg qd) Prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers after an acute coronary syndrome (2.5 mg bid combined with standard antiplatelet therapy)** 2-4 5-13 24-48 Hepatobiliary: 66% Active renal secretion: 33% Renal elimination of inactive metabolites: 33% Take 15- and 20-mg doses with food Avoid strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitorsCaution with strong CYP3A4 inducers Stroke prevention: 15 mg qd in patients with CrCl 15-49 ml/min
Edoxaban Factor Xa None currently 1-3 9-11 No data Hepatobiliary: 50%Active renal secretion: 50% Not expected to be clinically relevant No current recommendation Reduced doses tested in clinical studies for patients with CrCl 30-50 ml/min or body weight <60 kg or receiving concomitant strong P-gp inhibitors
Dabigatran Thrombin VTE prevention in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery (220 mg qd)** Prevention of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF (150 mg bid) 0.5-2 12-17 24-96 Hepatobiliary: 20%Active renal secretion: 80% Taking with food delays tmax by ~2 h Avoid strong P-gp inhibitors or inducers VTE prevention: 150 mg qd in patients with CrCl 30-50 ml/min or for reasons of age >75 years or the risk of drug interactionsStroke prevention: 110 mgf bid/75 mg*** bid for reasons of age >80 years or the risk of drug interactions
Table 1. Summary of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.
* Europe and North America. "Europe only. "'UnitedStates only.
AF = atrial fibrillation; bid = twice daily; CrCl = creatinine clearance; CYP3A4 = cytochrome P450 3A4; DTT = deep venous thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism; P-gp = P-glycoprotein; qd = once daily; / = half-life; t = time to maximal concentration; J-TE = venous thromboembolism.
Да
иная интернет-версия статьи была скачана с сайта http://www.gyn.su . Не предназначено для использования в коммерческих целях.
Study Name (Ref. #) Design Patients (Number Randomized) Study Arms Treatment Duration Primary Efficacy Outcome Primary Bleeding Outcome Other Bleeding Outcomes
ADVANCE-1 (15) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, noninferiority Undergoing elective total knee replacement (N = 3,195) Apixaban oral 2.5 mg bid or enoxaparin sc 30 mg bid 10-14 days VTE plus all-cause death: 9.0% vs. 8.8% (p = 0.06 for noninferiority) Major bleeding: 0.7% vs. 1.4% (p = 0.053) Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 2.9% vs. 4.3% (p = 0.03)
ADVANCE-2 (16) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, noninferiority Undergoing elective total knee replacement (N = 3,057) Apixaban oral 2.5 mg bid or enoxaparin sc 40 mg qd 10-14 days VTE plus all-cause death: 15.1% vs. 24.4% (p < 0.0001) Major bleeding: 0.6% vs. 0.9% (p = 0.3014) Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 3.5% vs. 4.8% (p = 0.0881)
ADVANCE-3 (17) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, noninferiority Undergoing elective total hip replacement (N = 5,407) Apixaban oral 2.5 mg bid or enoxaparin sc 40 mg qd 32-38 days VTE plus all-cause death: 1.4% vs. 3.9% (p < 0.001) Major bleeding: 0.8% vs. 0.7% (p = 0.54) Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 4.8% vs. 5.0% (p = 0.72)
REC0RD1 (23) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, superiority Age >18 yrs undergoing elective total hip replacement (N = 4,541) Rivaroxaban oral 10 mg qd or enoxaparin sc 40 mg qd 5 weeks VTE plus all-cause death: 1.1% vs. 3.7% (p < 0.001) Major bleeding: 0.3% vs. 0.1% (P = 0.18) Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 3.2% vs. 2.5% (p = NS)
REC0RD2 (24) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, superiority Age >18 yrs undergoing elective total hip replacement (N = 2,509) Rivaroxaban oral 10 mg qd or enoxaparin sc 40 mg qd 31-39 days (rivaroxaban) or 10-14 days (enoxaparin) VTE plus all-cause death: 2.0% vs. 9.3% (p < 0.0001) Major bleeding: <0.1% vs. <0.1% Any on-treatment bleeding: 6.6% vs. 5.5% (p = 0.25)
REC0RD3 (25) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, superiority Age >18 yrs undergoing elective total knee replacement (N = 2,531) Rivaroxaban oral 10 mg qd or enoxaparin sc 40 mg qd 10-14 days VTE plus all-cause death: 9.6% vs. 18.9% (p < 0.001) Major bleeding: 0.6% vs. 0.5% (P = 0.77) Any on-treatment bleeding: 4.9% vs. 4.8% (p = 0.93)
REC0RD4 (26) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, superiority Age >18 yrs undergoing elective total knee replacement (N = 3,148) Rivaroxaban oral 10 mg qd or enoxaparin sc 30 mg bid 10-14 days VTE plus all-cause death: 6.9% vs. 10.1 % (p = 0.0118) Major bleeding: 0.7% vs. 0.3% (p = 0.1096) Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 3.0% vs. 2.3% (p = 0.1790)
RE-NOVATE (34) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs undergoing elective total hip replacement (N = 3,494) Dabigatran etexilate oral 150 or 220 mg qd (half-quantity first dose) or enoxaparin sc 40 mg qd 28-35 days VTE plus all-cause death: 8.6% and 6.0% vs. 6.7% (p < 0.0001 for noninferiority) Major bleeding: 1.3% and 2.0% vs. 1.6% (p = 0.60 and p = 0.44 vs. enoxaparin) Nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 4.7% and 4.2% vs. 3.5%
RE-NOVATE II (35) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs undergoing elective total hip replacement (N = 2,055) Dabigatran etexilate oral 220 mg qd (half-quantity first dose) or enoxaparin sc 40 mg qd 28-35 days VTE plus all-cause death: 7.7% vs. 8.8% (p < 0.0001 for noninferiority) Major bleeding: 1.4% vs. 0.9% (p = 0.40) Major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 3.7% vs. 2.9% (p = 0.33)
RE-MODEL (36) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs undergoing elective total knee replacement (N = 2,101) Dabigatran etexilate oral 150 or 220 mg qd (half-quantity first dose) or enoxaparin sc 40 mg qd 6-10 days VTE plus all-cause death: 40.5% and 36.4% vs. 37.7% (p = 0.017 and p = 0.0003 for noninferiority) Major bleeding: 1.3% and 1.5% vs. 1.3% (p = 1.0 and p = 0.82 vs. enoxaparin) Nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 6.8% and 5.9% vs. 5.3%
RE-MOBILIZE (37) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs undergoing elective total knee replacement (N = 2,615) Dabigatran etexilate oral 150 or 220 mg qd (half-quantity first dose) or enoxaparin sc 30 mg bid 12-15 days VTE plus all-cause death: 33.7% and 31.1% vs. 25.3% (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02 in favor of enoxaparin) Major bleeding: 0.6% and 0.6% vs. 1.4% Nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 2.5% and 2.7% vs. 2.4%
Table 2. Efficacy and Bleeding Outcomes in Phase III Clinical Studies of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery.
ADVANCE-1 = Apixaban Dosed Orally Versus Anti-coagulation with Injectable Enoxaparin to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism-1; ADVANCES = Apixaban Dosed Orally Versus Anticoagulation with Injectable Enoxaparin to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism-3; NS = nonsignificant; RECORD = REgulation of Coagulation in ORthopaedic surgeiy to prevent Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism; RE-MODEL = Dabigatran Etexilate 150 mg or 220 mg Once Daily (o.d.) Versus (vs.) Enoxaparin 40 mg o.d. for Prevention of Thrombosis After Knee Surgeiy; RE-NOVATE = Dabigatran Etexilate in Extended Venous Thromboembolism (TTE) Prevention After Hip Replacement Surgeiy; RE-NOVATE II = Dabigatran Etexilate Compared With Enoxaparin in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Following Total Hip Arthroplasty ; sc = subcutaneous; other abbreviations as in Table 1.
I ôN? • 01 • 910Z
иная интернет-версия статьи была скачана с сайта http://www.gyn.su . Не предназначено для использования в коммерческих целях.
формацию о репринтах можно получить в редакции. Тел.: +7 (495) 649-54-95; эл. почта: [email protected]. СорупдМ © 2016 Издательство ИРБИС^сеправаохраняются^
M
о
АКУШЕРСТВО • ГИНЕКОЛОГИЯ • РЕПРОДУКЦИЯ
2016 • Том 10 • № 1
Study Name (Ref. #) Design Patients (Number Randomized) Study Arms Treatment Duration Primary Efficacy Outcome Primary Bleeding Outcome Other Bleeding Outcomes
AMPLIFY (18) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority Age >18 yrs with confirmed proximal DVT or symptomatic PE with or without DVT (N = 5,400) Apixaban oral 10 mg bid for 7 days followed by 5 mg bid orenoxaparin sc 1.0 mg/kg bid for >5 days plus VKA started <48 h after randomization 6 months Recurrent, symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death: 2.3% vs. 2.7% (p < 0.001 for noninferiority) Major bleeding: 0.6% vs. 1.8% (p < 0.001) Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 4.3% vs. 9.7% (p < 0.001)
EINSTEIN DVT (30) Multicenter, randomized, open-label, event-driven, active control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs with confirmed proximal DVT without symptomatic PE (N =3,449) Rivaroxaban oral 15 mg bid for 3 weeks followed by 20 mg qd or enoxaparin sc 1.0 mg/kg bid for >5 days plus VKA started <48 h after randomization 3, 6, or 12 months Recurrent VTE: 2.1% vs. 3.0% (p < 0.001 for noninferiority) Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 8.1% vs. 8.1% (P = 0.77) Major bleeding: 0.8% vs. 1.2% (p = 0.21)
EINSTEIN PE (31) Multicenter, randomized, open-label, event-driven, active control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs with confirmed acute symptomatic PE with or without DVT (N = 4,832) Rivaroxaban oral 15 mg bid for 3 weeks followed by 20 mg qd or enoxaparin sc 1.0 mg/kg bid for >5 days plus VKA started <48 h after randomization 3, 6, or 12 months Recurrent, symptomatic VTE: 2.1% vs. 1.8% (p = 0.003 for noninferiority) Major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 10.3% vs. 11.4% (p = 0.23) Major bleeding: 1.1% vs. 2.2% (p = 0.003)
RE-COVER (38) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs with acute, symptomatic VTE and eligible for 6 months of anticoagulant therapy (N = 2,564) Induction with a parenteral anticoagulant followed by dabigatran etexilate oral 150 mg bid vs. warfarin oral (INR, 2.0-3.0) qd 6 months Recurrent, symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death: 2.4% vs. 2.1% (p < 0.001 for noninferiority) Major bleeding: 1.6% vs. 1.9% (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.45-1.48) Major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 5.6% vs. 8.8% (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.84)
RE-COVER II (39) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs with acute, symptomatic VTE (N = 2,568) Induction with a parenteral anticoagulant followed by dabigatran etexilate oral 150 mg bid vs. warfarin oral (INR, 2.0-3.0) qd 6 months Recurrent, symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death: 2.3% vs. 2.2% (p < 0.001 for noninferiority) Major bleeding: 1.2% vs. 1.7% (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.36-1.32) Any bleeding: 15.6% vs. 22.1% (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.56-0.81)
Hokusai-VTE (8) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active control, non-inferiority Age >18 yrs with acute, symptomatic VTE (N = 8,240) Induction with sc heparin followed by edoxaban oral 60 mg qd* vs. warfarin qd (INR, 2.0-3.0) 3-12 months Recurrent, symptomatic VTE: 3.2% vs. 3.5% (p < 0.001 for noninferiority) Major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 8.5% vs. 10.3% (p = 0.004) Major bleeding: 1.4% vs. 1.6% (p = 0.35)
Table 3. Bleeding Outcomes in Phase III Clinical Studies of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism.
* 30 mg qd in patients with creatinine clearance 30 to 50 ml/ruin, body weight <60 kg, or receiving concomitant treatment with a potent P-glycoprotein inhibitor.
AMPLIFY = Apixaban for the Initial Management ofPulmonaty Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-Line Therapy; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; INR = international normalized ratio; RE-COIER = Efficacy and Safety ofDabigatran Compared to Warfarin for 6 Month Treatment of Acute Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism; RE-COIERII = Phase III Study Testing Efficacy & Safety of Oral Dabigatran Etexilate vs Warfarin for 6 m Treatment for Acute Syrnp Venous Thromboembolism (TTE); VKA = vitamin K antagonist; other abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 2
Да
иная интернет-версия статьи была скачана с сайта http://www.gyn.su . Не предназначено для использования в коммерческих целях.
Study Name (Ref. #) Design Patients (Number Randomized) Study Arms Treatment Duration Primary Efficacy Outcome Primary Bleeding Outcome Other Bleeding Outcomes
AMPLIFY-EXT (19) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority Age >18 yrs who had completed 6-12 months of treatment for previous VTE (N = 2,486) Apixaban oral 2.5 or 5 mg bid vs. placebo 12 months Recurrent, symptomatic VTE or all-cause death: 3.8% and 4.2% vs. 11.6% (p < 0.001) Major bleeding: 0.2% and 0.1% vs. 0.5% (p = NS for both comparisons) Major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 3.2% and 4.3% vs. 2.7% (p = NS for both comparisons)
EINSTEIN EXT (30) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, event-driven, placebo-controlled, superiority Age >18 yrs who had received 6-12 months of anticoagulant therapy for VTE (N =1,197) Rivaroxaban oral 20 mg qd or placebo 6 or 12 months Recurrent VTE: 1.3% vs. 7.1 % (p < 0.001) Major bleeding: 0.7% vs. 0.0% (P = 0.11) Major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 6.0% vs. 1.2% (p < 0.001)
RE-MEDY (40) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active control, non-inferiority Patients who had completed 3-12 months of anticoagulant therapy for VTE (N = 2,866) Dabigatran etexilate oral 150 mg bid vs. warfarin oral (INR, 2.0-3.0) qd 6-36 months Recurrent VTE or VTE-related death: 1.8% vs. 1.3% (p = 0.01 for noninferiority) Major bleeding: 0.9% vs. 1.8% (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.27-1.02) Major or clinically relevant bleeding: 5.6% vs. 10.2% (p < 0.001)
RE-SONATE (40) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, superiority Patients who had completed 6-18 months of anticoagulant therapy for VTE (N = 1,353) Dabigatran etexilate oral 150 mg bid or placebo 6 months Recurrent VTE or VTE-related/ unexplained death: 0.4% vs. 5.6% (p < 0.001) Major bleeding: 0.3% vs. 0.0% (p = NS) Major or clinically relevant bleeding: 5.3% vs. 1.8% (p = 0.001)
Table 4. Bleeding Outcomes in Phase III Clinical Studies of Long-Term Treatment With Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism.
AAIPLIFY-EXT = Apixaban after the Initial Management of Pulmonaty Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis with First-Line Therapy—Extended Treatment; RE-MEDY = Secondaiy Prevention of Venous Tlirombo Embolism (VTE); RE-SONATE = Twice-daily Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate in the Long Term Prevention of Recurrent Symptomatic TTE; other abbreviations as in Tables 1 to 3.
"^Ян
I qN? • 01 • 910Z
ная интернет-версия статьи была скачана с сайта http://www.gyn.su . Не предназначено для использования в коммерческих целях. _
формацию о репринтах можно получить в редакции. Тел.: +7 (495) 649-54-95; эл. почта: [email protected]. СорупдМ © 2016 Издательство ИРБИС. Все права охраняются.
M M
АКУШЕРСТВО • ГИНЕКОЛОГИЯ • РЕПРОДУКЦИЯ
2016 • Том 10 • № 1
Study Name (Ref. #) Design Patients (Number Randomized) Study Arms Treatment Duration Primary Efficacy Outcome Primary Bleeding Outcome Other Bleeding Outcomes
AVERROES (20) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, superiority Age >50 yrs with AF and >1 risk factors for stroke who met the criteria for, but were not suitable for, warfarin (N = 5,599) Apixaban oral 2.5 or 5 mg bid vs. ASA oral 81-324 mg qd Median 1.1 yrs Stroke or systemic embolism: 1.6% vs. 3.7%/yr (p < 0.001) Major bleeding: 1.4% vs. 1,2%/yr (p = 0.57) ICH: 0.4% vs. 0.4%/yr (p = 0.69)GI bleeding: 0.4% vs. 0.4%/yr (p = 0.71)
ARISTOTLE (21) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority/ superiority Patients with AF with >1 risk factors for stroke (N = 18,201) Apixaban oral 2.5 or 5 mg bid vs. oral warfarin qd (INR, 2.0-3.0) Median 1.8 yrs Stroke or systemic embolism: 1.3% vs. 1,6%/yr (p = 0.01 for superiority) Major bleeding: 2.1% vs. 3.1%/yr (p < 0.001) Major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 4.1% vs. 6.0%/yr (p < 0.001) Major intracranial bleeding: 0.3% vs. 0.8%/yr (p < 0.001) Major GI bleeding: 0.8% vs. 0.9%/yr (p = 0.37)
ROCKET AF (32) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs with AFat moderate to high risk of stroke (N = 14,264) Rivaroxaban oral 20 mg qd (15 mg qd in patients with CrCl 30-49 ml/min) or warfarin adjusted to maintain an INR of 2.0-3.0 Median 590 days Stroke or systemic embolism: 1.7% vs. 2.2% (p < 0.001 for noninferiority) Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding: 14.9% vs. 14.5%/ yr (p = 0.44) Major bleeding: 3.6% vs. 3.4%/yr (p = 0.58)ICH: 0.5% vs. 0.7%/yr (p = 0.02) Fatal bleeding: 0.2% vs. 0.5%/yr (p = 0.003) GI bleeding: 3.2% vs. 2.2% (p < 0.001)
RE-LY (41) Multicenter, randomized, single-blind, active control, noninferiority Age >18 yrs with AF and >1 risk factors for stroke (N = 18,113) Dabigatran etexilate oral 110 or 150 mg bid vs. oral warfarin qd (INR, 2.0-3.0) Median 2 yrs Stroke or systemic embolism: 1.5% and 1.1%/yrvs. 1.7%/yr (p < 0.001 for noninferiority and superiority, respectively) Major bleeding: 2.7% and 3.1% vs. 3.4%/yr (p = 0.003 and p = 0.31 vs. warfarin) Any bleeding: 14.6% and 16.4% vs. 18.2%/yr (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002 vs. warfarin)ICH: 0.23% and 0.30% vs. 0.74%/yr (p < 0.001 vs. warfarin)GI bleeding: 1.1 % and 1.5% vs. 1.0%/year (p = 0.43 and p < 0.001 vs. warfarin) Life-threatening bleeding: 1.2% and 1.5% vs. 1.8% (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04 vs. warfarin)
RELY-ABLE (42) Multicenter, double-blind, extension, descriptive Patients who completed RE-LY without drug discontinuation (N = 5,851*) Dabigatran etexilate oral 150 or 110 mg bid Median 28 months Stroke or systemic embolism: 1.5% vs. 1.6% (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.69-1.20) Major bleeding: 3.7% vs. 3.0%/ year (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.04-1.53) Life-threatening bleeding: 1.8% vs. 1.6%/year (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.87-1.49) Fatal bleeding: 0.2% vs. 0.3%/yr (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.46-1.89) ICH: 0.3% vs. 0.3%/yr (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.68-2.51) GI bleeding: 1.5% vs. 1,6%/yr (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.75-1.31)
Engage AF-TIMI 48 (7) Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active control, noninferiority Age >21 yrs with AF confirmed for 12 months and CHADS2 >2 (N = 21,105) Edoxaban oral 30 mg or 60 mg qd** vs. oral warfarin qd (INR 2.0-3.0) Median 2.8 yrs Stroke or systemic embolism: 1.6% and 1.2%/yrvs. 1.5%/yr (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001 for noninferiority, respectively) Major bleeding: 1.6% and 2.8%/yr vs. 3.4%/yr (p < 0.001 for both doses) Death or ICH: 4.0% and 4.3%/yr vs. 4.9%/yr (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004)Fatal bleeding: 0.1% and 0.2%/yr vs. 0.4%/yr (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006) GI bleeding: 0.8% and 1,5%/yr vs. 1,2%/yr (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03)
Table 5. Bleeding Outcomes in Phase III Clinical Studies of Long-Term Therapy With Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Stroke and Systemic Embolism in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
"Patients enrolled in stuck' (randomization was carried over from RE-LY); RELY-ABLE was a descriptive stuck' with no formal primary endpoints. "Half dose in patients with CrCl 30 to 50 ml/ruin, body weight <60 kg, or receiving verapamil, quinidine, or dronedarone.
ASA = acetylsalicylic acid; CHADS, = Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age >75 years, Diabetes mellitus, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack (2 points); GI = gastrointestinal; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; RE-LY = Randomized Evaluation of Long Term Anticoagulant TherapY; RELY-ABLE = Long Term Multi-Center Extension of Dabigatran Treatment with Atrial Fibrillation; other abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 3.
Да
иная интернет-версия статьи была скачана с сайта http://www.gyn.su . Не предназначено для использования в коммерческих целях.
Drug Quantitative Assays (Provides an Estimate of Anticoagulant Drug Levels) Qualitative Assays (to Indicate Presence or Absence of Drug Effect) Not Recommended
Direct factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban/rivaroxaban/edoxaban) Specific, calibrated anti-factor Xa assays Prothrombin time assay read in seconds with sensitive reagents Insensitive prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin inhibition, or heparin-specific assays
Direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) HEMOCLOT (Aniara, West Chester, Ohio) dilute thrombin assay Activated partial thromboplastin time, ecarin clotting time, thrombin time Assays that do not measure thrombin inhibition, heparin-specific assays
к
о
X
сс
X
0
сс ш сс
с
01
s
Table 6. Appropriateness of Assays for Monitoring the Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.
References:
1. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer EEIG. Eliquis (apixaban) Summary of Product Characteristics. 2014. Available at: http://www. ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/ EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002148/ WC500107728.pdf. (accessed: 10.10.2015).
2. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pfizer Inc. Eliquis (apixaban) Prescribing Information. 2014. Available at: http://packageinserts.bms. com/pi/pi_eliquis.pdf. (accessed: 10.10.2015).
3. Bayer Pharma AG. Xarelto (rivaroxaban) Summary of Product Characteristics.
2014. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_ Product_Information/human/000944/ WC500057108.pdf. 4 (accessed: 10.10.2015).
4. Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. Xarelto (rivaroxaban) Prescribing Information.
2014. Available at: http://www.xareltohcp.com/ sites/default/files/pdf/xarelto_0.pdf. (accessed: 10.10.2015).
5. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate) Summary of Product Characteristics. 2014. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/ document_library/EPAR_-_Product_ Information/human/000829/WC500041059.pdf. (accessed: 10.10.2015)
6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate) Prescribing Information. 2014. Available at: http://bidocs. boehringer-ingelheim.com/BIWebAccess/ ViewServlet.ser?docBase=renetnt& folderPath=/Prescribing Information/PIs/ Pradaxa/Pradaxa.pdf. (accessed: 10.10.2015)
7. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 2093-2104.
8. The Hokusai-VTE Investigators. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1406-1415.
9. Eikelboom JW, Weitz J.I. New anticoagulants. Circulation. 2010; 121: 1523-1532.
10. Levy J.H., Faraoni D., Spring J.L., Douketis J.D., Samama C.M. Managing new oral anticoagulants in the perioperative and intensive care unit setting. Anesthesiology.
2013; 118: 1466-1474.
11. Samama M.M., Guinet C. Laboratory assessment of new anticoagulants. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011; 49: 761-772.
12. Schulman S., Bijsterveld N.R. Anticoagulants and their reversal. Transfus Med Rev. 2007; 21: 37-48.
13. Kearon C., Akl E.A., Comerota A.J., et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012; 141: e419S-e494S.
14. Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Inc., Pfizer Canada Inc. Eliquis (apixaban) Product Monograph. 2014. Available at: http://www. bmscanada.ca/static/products/en/pm_pdf/ ELIQUIS_EN_PM.pdf. (accessed: 10.10.2015)
15. Lassen M.R., Raskob G.E., Gallus A., Pineo G., Chen D., Portman R.J. Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 594-604.
16. Lassen M.R., Raskob G.E., Gallus A., et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE-2): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2010; 375: 807-815.
17. Lassen M.R., Gallus A., Raskob G.E., et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 2487-2498.
18. Agnelli G., Buller H.R., Cohen A., et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 799-808.
19. Agnelli G., Buller H.R., Cohen A., et al. Apixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 699-708.
20. Connolly S.J., Eikelboom J., Joyner C., et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 806-817.
21. Granger C.B., Alexander J.H., McMurray J.J., et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;
365: 981-992.
22. Alexander J.H., Lopes R.D., James S., et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 699-708.
23. Eriksson B.I., Borris L.C., Friedman R.J., et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty.
N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 2765-2775.
24. Kakkar A.K., Brenner B., Dahl O.E., et al. Extended duration rivaroxaban versus short-term enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 372: 31-39.
25. Lassen M.R., Ageno W., Borris L.C., et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;
358: 2776-2786.
26. Turpie A.G.G., Lassen M.R., Davidson B.L., et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (RECORD4): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2009; 373: 1673-1680.
27. Eriksson B.I., Kakkar A.K., Turpie A.G.G., et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91: 636-644.
28. Turpie A.G.G., Lassen M.R., Eriksson B.I., et al. Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost. 2011; 105: 444-453.
29. Lassen M.R., Gent M., Kakkar A.K., et al. The effects of rivaroxaban on the complications of surgery after total hip or knee replacement: results from the RECORD programme. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94: 1573-1578.
30. The EINSTEIN Investigators. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 2499-2510.
31. The EINSTEIN-PE Investigators. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1287-1297.
32. Patel M.R., Mahaffey K.W., Garg J., et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 883-891.
33. Mega J.L., Braunwald E., Wiviott S.D., et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 9-19.
34. Eriksson B.I., Dahl O.E., Rosencher N., et al. Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for
prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, doubleblind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2007; 370: 949-956.
35. Eriksson B.I., Dahl O.E., Huo M.H., et al. Oral dabigatran versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip arthroplasty (RE-NOVATE II). A randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Thromb Haemost. 2011; 105: 721-729.
36. Eriksson B.I., Dahl O.E., Rosencher N., et al. Oral dabigatran etexilate vs. subcutaneous enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: the RE-MODEL randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5: 2178-2185.
37. The RE-MOBILIZE Writing Committee. Oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate vs North American enoxaparin regimen for prevention of venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2009;
24:1-9.
38. Schulman S., Kearon C., Kakkar A.K., et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 2342-2352.
39. Schulman S., Kakkar A.K., Goldhaber S.Z., et al. Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis. Circulation. 2014;
129:764-772.
40. Schulman S., Kearon C., Kakkar A.K., et al. Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 709-718.
41. Connolly S.J., Ezekowitz M.D., Yusuf S., et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;
361: 1139-1151.
42. Connolly S.J., Wallentin L., Ezekowitz M.D., et al. The long-term multicenter observational study of dabigatran treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study. Circulation. 2013; 128: 237-243.
43. Schulman S., Beyth R.J., Kearon C., Levine M.N. American College of Chest Physicians. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant and thrombolytic treatment: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008; 133: 257-298.
44. Dale B., Eikelboom J.W., Weitz J.I., et al. Dabigatran attenuates thrombin generation to a lesser extent than warfarin: could this explain their differential effects on intracranial hemorrhage and myocardial infarction?
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013; 35: 295-301.
45. Eriksson B.I., Quinlan D.J., Eikelboom J.W. Novel oral Factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors in the management of thromboembolism. Annu Rev Med. 2011; 62: 41-57.
46. Bristol-Myers Squibb. Coumadin (warfarin sodium) Prescribing Information. 2011. Available at: http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/ pi_coumadin.pdf. (accessed: 10.10.2015)
47. Troconiz I.F., Tillmann C., Liesenfeld K.H., Schafer H.G., Stangier J. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the new oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (BIBR 1048) in patients undergoing primary elective total hip replacement surgery.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 47: 371-382.
48. Weinz C., Schwarz T., Kubitza D., Mueck W.,
Lang D. Metabolism and excretion of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, in rats, dogs and humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009; 37: 1056-1064.
49. Mueck W., Kubitza D., Becka M. Co-administration of rivaroxaban with drugs that share its elimination pathways: pharmacokinetic effects in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 76: 455-466.
50. Zhang D., He K., Raghavan N., et al. Comparative metabolism of 14C-labeled apixaban in mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, and humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009;
37: 1738-1748.
51. Stangier J., Rathgen K., Stahle H., Mazur D. Influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dabigatran etexilate: an open-label, parallel-group, single-centre study. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010; 49: 259-268.
52. Heidbuchel H., Verhamme P., Alings M., et al. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013; 15: 625-651.
53. Stangier J., Stahle H., Rathgen K., Roth W., Shakeri-Nejad K. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dabigatran etexilate, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, are not affected by moderate hepatic impairment. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 48: 1411-1419.
54. Kubitza D., Roth A., Becka M., et al. Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of rivaroxaban - an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 76: 89-98.
55. Graff J., Harder S. Anticoagulant therapy with the oral direct Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in patients with hepatic impairment. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013; 52: 243-254.
56. Kubitza D., Becka M., Zuehlsdorf M., Mueck W. Effect of food, an antacid, and the H2 antagonist ranitidine on the absorption of BAY 59-7939 (rivaroxaban), an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006; 46: 549-558.
57. Stampfuss J., Kubitza D., Becka M., Mueck W. The effect of food on the absorption and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 51: 549-561.
58. Mendell J., Tachibana M., Shi M., Kunitada S. Effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of edoxaban, an oral direct Factor Xa inhibitor, in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 51: 687-694.
59. Turpie A.G.G., Kreutz R., Llau J., Norrving B., Haas S. Management consensus guidance for the use of rivaroxaban - an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Thromb Haemost. 2012;
108: 876-886.
60. Lindhoff-Last E., Ansell J., Spiro T., Samama M.M. Laboratory testing of rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice: when, how, and which assays. Ann Med. 2013; 45: 423-429.
61. Barrett Y.C., Wang Z., Frost C., Shenker A. Clinical laboratory measurement of direct Factor Xa inhibitors: anti-Xa assay is preferable to prothrombin time assay. Thromb Haemost. 2010; 104: 1263-1271.
62. van Ryn J., Baruch L., Clemens A. Interpretation of point-of-care INR results in
patients treated with dabigatran. Am J Med. 2012; 125: 417-420.
63. Stangier J., Feuring M. Using the HEMOCLOT direct thrombin inhibitor assay to determine plasma concentrations of dabigatran. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2012; 23: 138-143.
64. Stangier J., Rathgen K., Stahle H., Gansser D., Roth W. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 64: 292-303.
65. Spyropoulos A.C., Douketis J.D. How I treat anticoagulated patients undergoing an elective procedure or surgery. Blood. 2012; 120: 2954-2962.
66. Gogarten W., Vandermeulen E., Van Aken H., Kozek S., Llau J.V., Samama C.M.; Regional anaesthesia and antithrombotic agents: recommendations of the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27: 999-1015.
67. Sié P., Samama C.M., Godier A., et al. Surgery and invasive procedures in patients on long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants: thrombin or Factor-Xa inhibitors. Recommendations of the Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis and the French Study Group on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011; 104: 669-676.
68. Heidbuchel H., Verhamme P., Alings M.,
et al. EHRA practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34: 2094-2106.
69. Healey J.S., Eikelboom J., Douketis J., et al. Periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with warfarin: results from the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy (RE-LY) randomized trial. Circulation. 2012; 126: 343-348.
70. Sherwood M.W., Douketis J.D., Patel M.R., et al. Outcomes of temporary interruption of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: results from ROCKET AF. Circulation. 2014; 129: 1850-1859.
71. Weinz C., Buetehorn U., Daehler H.P., et al. Pharmacokinetics of BAY 59-7939 - an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor - in rats and dogs. Xenobiotica. 2005; 35: 891-910.
72. Khadzhynov D., Wagner F., Formella S., et al. Effective elimination of dabigatran by haemodialysis. A phase I single-centre study in patients with end-stage renal disease. Thromb Haemost. 2013; 109: 596-605.
73. Pragst I., Zeitler S.H., Doerr B., et al. Reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation by prothrombin complex concentrate (Beriplex P/N) in a rabbit model. J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10: 1841-1848.
74. Godier A., Miclot A., Le Bonniec B., et al. Evaluation of prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII to reverse rivaroxaban in a rabbit model. Anesthesiology. 2012; 116: 94-102.
75. Lambourne M.D., Eltringham-Smith L.J., Gataiance S., Arnold D.M., Crowther M.A., Sheffield W.P. Prothrombin complex concentrates reduce blood loss in murine coagulopathy induced by warfarin, but not in that induced by dabigatran etexilate. J Thromb Haemost. 2012; 10: 1830-1840.
K G I-2 k ■
X
cc
X o
cc m cc
c
ai o QÛ
d s
LU CL
O m
x Ö
K -D
^ q
CD CD
CC
CD
O f-
^ jz
m Ç?
K ^
S Q.
X O
S O
° d
n d .0
O çn
n
X C
n
s ^
s ®
s m
O. en c I
® s
en
= S
tO X d m ^ m
CT
I ï
S Ç
Q. CD
w m G ™
G CD
m
.D
T
c; o
G X
o;
cc iX s Πc CD
G ΠCD CD i
I-
CD X O. O
S Œ
O
http://www.gyn.su/
<s CIS
24
к
о
76. Perzborn E., Gruber A., Tinel H., et al. Reversal of rivaroxaban anticoagulation by haemostatic agents in rats and primates. Thromb Haemost. 2013; 110: 162-172.
77. Martin A.C., Le Bonniec B., Fischer A.M., et al. Evaluation of recombinant activated factor VII, prothrombin complex concentrate, and fibrinogen concentrate to reverse apixaban
in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168: 4228-4233.
78. Zhou W., Zorn M., Nawroth P., et al. Hemostatic therapy in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage associated with rivaroxaban. Stroke. 2013; 44: 771-778.
79. Eerenberg E.S., Kamphuisen P.W., Sijpkens M.K., Meijers J.C., Buller H.R., Levi M. Reversal of rivaroxaban and dabigatran by prothrombin complex concentrate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. Circulation. 2011; 124: 1573-1579.
80. Marlu R., Hodaj E., Paris A., Albaladejo P., Crackowski J.L., Pernod G. Effect of non-
specific reversal agents on anticoagulant activity of dabigatran and rivaroxaban. A randomised crossover ex vivo study in healthy volunteers. Thromb Haemost. 2012; 108: 217-224.
81. Fukuda T., Honda Y., Kamisato C., Morishima Y., Shibano T. Reversal of anticoagulant effects of edoxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, with haemostatic agents. Thromb Haemost. 2012; 107: 253-259.
82. Körber M.K., Langer E., Ziemer S., Perzborn E., Gericke C., von Heymann C. Measurement and reversal of prophylactic and therapeutic peak levels of rivaroxaban: an in vitro study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2014; 20: 735-740.
83. Khoo T.L., Weatherburn C., Kershaw G., Reddel C.J., Curnow J., Dunkley S. The use of FEIBA(R) in the correction of coagulation abnormalities induced by dabigatran. Int J Lab Hematol. 2013; 35: 222-224.
84. Levi M., Moore K., Castillejos C., et al. Comparison of three- and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates on the
anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban in healthy volunteers. J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12: 1428-1436.
85. Pernod G., Albaladejo P., Godier A., et al. Management of major bleeding complications and emergency surgery in patients on long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants, thrombin or factor-Xa inhibitors: proposals of the Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) - March 2013.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013; 106: 382-393.
86. Lu G., DeGuzman F.R., Hollenbach S.J., et al. A specific antidote for reversal of anticoagulation by direct and indirect inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa. Nat Med. 2013;
19: 446-451.
87. Pollack C.V. Jr., Reilly P.A., Eikelboom J., Glund S., Verhamme P., Bernstein R.A., Dubiel R., Huisman M.V., Hylek E.M., Kamphuisen P.W., Kreuzer J., Levy J.H., Sellke F.W., Stangier J., Steiner T., Wang B., Kam C.W., Weitz J.I. Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 511-520.
x
ro
X
0
го m го œ с
01 *
About the authors:
Inna Tzoran - MD, Deputy Director, Internal Medicine C Rambam Health Care Campus. P.O. Box 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel. Tel: +(972)47772029. Fax: +(972)47772343. E-mail: [email protected].
Benjamin Brenner - MD, Professor, Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Сведения об авторах:
Инна Тзоран - д.м.н., заместитель директора Центра внутренних болезней медицинского городка Рамбам. Адрес: а\я 9602, Хайфa 31096, Израиль. Тел.: +(972)47772029. Факс: +(972)47772343. E-mail: [email protected].
Бенджамин Бреннер - проф., Отделение гематологии и трансплантации костного мозга, Медицинский городок Рамбам, Хайфа, Израиль, Медицинский факультет им. Брюса Раппапорта, Технион, Хайфа, Израиль.
25 I
