CC BY
26
GEODYNAMICS & TECTONOPHYSICS
PUBLISHED BY THE INSTITUTE OF THE EARTH'S CRUST SIBERIAN BRANCH OF RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
2016 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2 PAGES 329-335 ISSN 2078-502X
http://dx.doi.org/10.5800/GT-2016-7-2-0210
Debris flow event of 2014 and its impact on the accumulation
OF THE SOLID FRACTION IN THE KYNGARGA RIVER CHANNEL, TUNKA
valley, Southwestern Cisbaikalia, Russia
A. V. Kadetova1, A. A. Rybchenko1, E. A. Kozyreva1, Yongbo Tie2, Huayong Ni2
1 Institute of the Earth's Crust, Siberian Branch of RAS, Irkutsk, Russia
2 Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resource, Chengdu, China
Abstract: On 28 June 2014, debris flows brought large volumes of loose material into the Kyngarga river valley. The material was sourced from rock collapse and rock sliding on the valley slopes and delivered mainly to the river by debris flows from the side valleys of the river basin. Our field studies and analysis of the satellite images revealed that the potential debris volume received by the river amounted to about 1x106 m3. The morphometric parameters of the Kyngarga river basin are favorable for the river-channel processes associated with floods, debris flows and waterrock flows.
Key words: debris flow; water-rock flow; Kyngarga river; morphometric analysis; debris flow basin
Recommended by K.G. Levi
For citation: Kadetova A.V., Rybchenko A.A., Kozyreva E.A., Tie Y., Ni H. 2016. Debris flow event of 2014 and its impact on the accumulation of the solid fraction in the Kyngarga river channel, Tunka valley, Southwestern Cisbaikalia, Russia. Geodynamics& Tectonophysics 7 (2), 329-335. doi:10.5800/GT-2016-7-2-0210.
Селевое событие 2014 года и его влияние на аккумуляцию
твердой фракции водокаменного селя в русле реки Кынгарга,
Тункинская долина, Юго-Западное Прибайкалье
А. В. Кадетова1, А. А. Рыбченко1, Е. А. Козырева1, Yongbo Tie2, Huayong Ni2
1 Институт земной коры СО РАН, Иркутск, Россия
2 Институт геологии и полезных ископаемых, Чэнду, Китай
Аннотация: В результате селевых потоков в долину реки Кынгарга 28 июня 2014 года поступило большое количество рыхлого материала. Источниками материала явились обвалы, осыпи со склонов бортов долины, большую часть материала поставили в русло реки селевые потоки, сошедшие с боковых долин бассейна. В результате полевых работ и дешифрирования космоснимков установлено, что в русло реки поступил потенциальный селевой материал в объеме около 1х106 м3. Морфометрические параметры бассейна реки Кынгарга способствуют формированию русловых процессов, связанных с паводками и водокаменными селями.
Ключевые слова: сель; водокаменный сель; река Кынгарга; морфометрический анализ; селевой бассейн
1. Introduction
Prolonged heavy rains in mountain river basins cause floods and debris flows [Fleischman, 1978; Perov, 2012]. These phenomena are related to specific morphometric characteristics of the mountain river basins and the accumulation of loose sediments in large amounts in the river valleys due to gravity and erosion processes. Debris flows can occur when three basic conditions are combined: morphometric features to provide for the gravitational component, geological setting to facilitate the accumulation of loose material, and weather conditions to generate a sufficient water component.
Kyngarga is a small mountain river starting at an altitude of 2578 m in the Tunka ridge, Russia. Its average flow velocity amounts to 1.8 m/sec and can exceed 3 m/sec during spring flood seasons. The river depth is typically less than 1.0-1.5 m in the lower and middle stream and 0.5 m in the upstream. Many of its small tributaries dry up in dry seasons. The river is mainly fed by melt, rain and ground water [Zonov, 1962]. A small resort village of Arshan, visited by many thousands of local and foreign travellers year round, is located near the river outlet to the plain, with the village houses and buildings constructed on both sides of the river, many in close proximity to the beaches prone to flooding. The Kyngarga water-rock flows took place in 1897, 1971, and 2014 [Lvov, Kropochev, 1909; Boudz, 1968; Levi et al., 2003; Makarov, 2012]. The dendro-chronological analyses show that water-rock flows occurred in 1928, 1935, 1939, 1952, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1971, 1973, and 1974 [Agafonov, Makarov, 1996].
According to the oral information from the Arshan residents and representatives of the village administration, an intense downpour lasted through the night of 27-28 June 2014. Its front was over the left tributary of the Kyngarga river and hanging cirques located east of the river [Kadetova et al., 2016]. Early in the morning on 28 June 2014, seven debris flows from the slopes of the Tunka ridge flooded the vicinity of the Arshan village, and a water-rock flow occurred in the Kyngarga river, and a significant damage was caused to the village houses and the infrastructure of the resort [Laper-din et al., 2014; Makarov et al., 2014; Kadetova et al., 2016]. The debris flows brought about 3x106 m3 of debris materials to the vicinity of the Arshan village. The
debris flows along the creek valleys in the Kyngarga river basin did not damage the village, but delivered large volumes of loose materials into the Kyngarda river valley, thus providing a solid fraction for potential water-rock-flows and debris flows.
The objectives of our study were to estimate the amount of loose materials delivered to the Kyngarda river during the debris flow event in June 2014, identify the main sources of such supplies into the river channel, and analyze the morphometric parameters of the river basin.
2. Geological, geomorphological and
CLIMATE CONDITIONS
The Kyngarga river valley is located in the Tunka ridge, glacial erosion mountains with vertical dissection from 600 to 1200 m. The total length of the mountainous part of the river valley is 7.35 km. The river basin has two main channels starting from the hanging cirques located about 2578 m a.s.l. Traces of glacial activity are observed in the upper reaches of its tributaries. From the altitude of 1480-1520 m, all the tributaries of the Kyngarga river have V-shaped valleys without any traces of glacial impact.
At the altitude of 1250 m, the tributaries flow into a wide valley graben. Its section is trapezoidal, with a flat bottom (to 200 m wide). In the valley graben, there are no traces of any ancient glacier [Shchetnikov, Ufimtsev, 2004]. The valley is wide in the middle stream area. It sharply narrows and turns into a straight canyon-shaped gorge about 2 km to the exit from the mountains to the plain. The riverbed is a continuous series of rapids alternating with cascades and waterfalls [Agafonov, 1996]. The maximum width of the Kyngarga river basin is 8.9 km; the length of the basin until the outlet to the plain amounts to 7.35 km; the basin area is 40.2 km2 (Table).
The structural-tectonic features and the recent regional seismic activity are favorable for further rock destruction and disintegration. Besides, gravitational displacements, such as landslides and rock collapse, may be stimulated by earthquakes. The rocks in the valley sides are tectonically fragmented as the valley belongs to the submeridional fault zone [Parfeevets, Sankov, 2006].
Main parameters of the mountainous part of the Kyngarga river basin Основные параметры горной части бассейна реки Кынгарга
Catchment Maximum Minimum Elevation Average width Length of River length Melton ratio Drainage
area, elevation, elevation, difference, of the basin, the basin, in the basin, [Melton, 1965] density
km2 m m m km km km [Horton, 1945]
40.21 2578.90 940.00 1638.90 5.47 7.35 65.65 0.26 1.63
Fig. 1. Scheme of the Kyngarga river basin.
1 - boundary of the Kungarga river basin; 2 - permanent and temporary streams of the Kyngarga river; 3 - geological boundaries; 4 - area of accumulative material resulting from heavy rains of 27-28 July 2014. Geological setting: Pt3mg - Mongoshinskaya suite. Limestone, dolomite, metamorphic schist interlayers, conglomerates at the base; Pt3br - Burungol suite. Metamorphic schist, limestone, volcanic rocks; Pti-2ir - Irkut suite. Marbleized limestone, gneisses interlayers, crustalline schist and quartzite, conglomerates at the base; A-Ptibz -Bezymyanskaya suite. Biotite, garnet-biotite, silimonite-biotite, amphibole-biotite gneiss, plagiogneiss and crystalline schist, rare marble interlayers; A-Ptikl - Kultuk suite (undifferentiated]. Biotite, garnet-biotite, amphibole-biotite, amphibole-pyroxene gneiss, plagiogneiss and crystalline schist, marble interlayers; (y-E^Pt3 - Late Proterozoic intrusions, phase III. Microcline granite, granosyenite and syenite, granite-aplite dikes; yiA-Pti - Archaean-Early Proterozoic intrusions, phase I. Foliated plagiogranite, ocellar gneiss-granite.
Рис. 1. Схема бассейна реки Кынгарга.
1 - граница водосборного бассейна р. Кынгарга; 2 - постоянные и временные водотоки р. Кынгарга; 3 - геологические границы; 4 - площадь аккумулятивных форм в русле р. Кынгарга, образовавшихся после интенсивных осадков 27-28 июля 2014 года. Геологическое строение: Pt3mg - Монгошинская свита. Известняки, доломиты, прослои метаморфических сланцев, в основании конгломераты; Pt3br - Бурунгольская свита. Метаморфические сланцы, известняки, эффузивы; Pti-2ir - Иркутная свита. Мрамо-ризованные известняки, прослои гнейсов, кристаллических сланцев и кварцитов, в основании конгломераты; A-Ptibz - Безы-мянская свита. Биотитовые, гранатово-биотитовые, силимонитово-биотитовые, амфиболово-биотитовые гнейсы, плагиогней-сы и кристаллические сланцы, редкие прослои мраморов; A-Ptikl - Култукская свита нерасчлененная. Биотитовые, гранатово-биотитовые, амфиболово-биотитовые, амфиболово-пироксеновые гнейсы, плагиогнейсы и кристалические сланцы, прослои мраморов; (y-E]3Pt3 - позднепротерозойские интрузии, III фаза. Микроклиновые граниты, граносиениты и сиениты, дайки гра-нит-аплитов; yiA-Pti - архейские-раннепротерозойские интрузии, I фаза. Разгнейсованные плагиограниты, очковые гнейсо-граниты.
Geologically, the mountain part of the Kyngarga river valley cuts through the Late Proterozoic and Archean intrusions represented by biotite, granite-biotite gneisses, schists and marbles [Sumburgh, 1971] (Fig. 1).
The regional climate is sharply continental. The climatic conditions of the Eastern Sayan region are defined by the three major factors: large temperature fluctuations (resulting in strong physical weathering), the presence of permafrost and seasonal frost, and sig-
nificant rainfalls and frequent intense downpours. All of the above factors contributes to the formation of debris flows. The precipitation is irregular in the study area and depends mainly on the terrain. The annual precipitation patterns is as follows: the smallest amount in winter (~30-35 mm), and the largest amount in summer (~350-400 mm). The annual records show that an average daily precipitation exceeds 30 mm in the Arshan village. According to the data from the Arshan weather station, the daily rainfall amount
Fig. 2. Accumulative material in the Kyngarga river valley: a - alluvial fan of debris flow; b - debris flow deposits (terraces) along the riverbed; c - loose material from the rock collapse; d - material from the rockslide.
Рис. 2. Аккумулятивные формы в долине реки Кынгарга: а - конус выноса селевого потока; b - селевые отложения (террасы) вдоль русла реки; c - рыхлый материал, поступивший в русло в результате обвала; d - материал, поступивший в русло реки в результате осыпи.
in summer may reach 170 mm [Meteorological Monthly Magazine, 1972].
3. Sources of the solid component of the debris flows in the Kyngarga river valley
The Kyngarga river valley is filled with loose material that is constantly delivered with the valley sides due to rock collapse and rock sliding processes, as well as due to erosion and debris flow processes after intense rainfalls. According to [Agafonov, 1996], large masses of loose material have been accumulated at the bottom of the river valley. The loose material volume is changeable - the river flow partially removes the accumulated material, but new amounts are delivered.
The field observations and the analysis of satellite images of the study area show that the Kyngarga river received a huge volume of loose debris after the heavy rains in June 2014, which caused the debris flows, rock
collapse and landslides (Fig. 2). River valley is cut by the creek valleys, i.e. elementary catchment areas. Most of such areas show active landsliding and develop as debris flow basins that supply loose material from the slopes directly to the river. There are nine debris flows of different sizes in the Kyngarga river basin, and the total accumulation area amounts to 0.57 km2 (see Fig. 1). The toes of the alluvial fans reached the riverbed and were partially washed out. The largest debris flow came down from the debris flow basin on the left side of the Kyngarga river basin. The area of its alluvial fan is 0.056 km2. The volume of material delivered by this debris flow amounted to 0.168 km3. The maximum size of the boulders transported by the debris flow amounts to 3 m. It should be noted that the river was not dammed because the debris flow alluvial fans were washed out by the water-rock flow that came down the Kyngarga river.
In the canyon-shaped segment of the Kyngarga river valley, loose material is supplied due to rock collapse,
landslides and rockslides on the steep rocky slopes. Such material includes large unrounded boulders, some of which are more than 5 m (Fig. 2). The talus cones contain gravel and rock blocks up to 2 m.
The river channel also contains some loose material delivered into the valley from the upper reaches of the river as a result of the water-rock flow. The material delivered from the valley sides, from the upper to lower reaches of the river, is redistributed and deposited in accumulation structures, such as lateral levees and terraces (up to 2 m thick). This material contains rounded rock pieces and thus differs from the rock-collapse and landslide materials.
4. MORPHOMETRIC PARAMETERS OF THE
KYNGARGA river BASIN
By analyzing the morphometric parameters of the Kyngarga river basin, we estimated the Melton ratio at 0.26 for the basin's length of 7.35 km (Table 1). The established regularities [Wilford et al., 2004; Welsh, 2007] suggest that such combination of parameters is favorable for the occurrence of floods and water-rock flows.
The Kyngarga river basin is large and branched. The drainage density is 1.63, i.e. the network of watercourses is quite dense. Such conditions provide for a more even distribution of rainfall in the basin, while due to the large catchment area, larger water volumes are accumulated in the basin during rainfalls.
The geological structure of the river basin is specific - the river channel narrows at the exit from the mountains to the plain and has some sharp bends. Therefore, solid materials cannot be moved freely down the river
and have to accumulate in the canyon-shaped segment. Moreover, such structure of river valley can result in cumulative effect of debris flow during the high flood [Agafonov, 1996].
5. Conclusion
The debris flows, rock collapse and landslides in June 20i4 supplied about ixi06 m3 of loose material to the Kyngarga river valley. Such material is the solid component of potential mudflows. Based on our analysis of the morphometric parameters of the Kyngarga river basin, there are grounds to conclude that the local conditions are favourable for the development of riverchannel processes associated with floods and waterrock flows. The geological structure of the basin and recent tectonic activity in the study area are favourable for the accumulation of loose material in the branching creek valleys, which is then either carried into the main river valley or stored directly in the valley. A potential for the occurrence of catastrophic events in the Kyn-garga river valley is high, should the above-described conditions be further complicated by prolonged intense rainfalls.
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supported by Research and Development Programme 0346-2014-0009. The physical and mechanical properties of the sampled soils were analyzed at the Geodynamics and Geochemistry Centre of the Institute of the Earth's Crust SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia.
7. References
Agafonov B.P., i996. Cumulative debris flows in the Baikal region. Geomorfologiya (Geomorphology] (2], 27-36 (in Russian] [Агафонов Б.П. Кумулятивные сели в Прибайкалье // Геоморфология. 1996. № 2. С. 27-36].
Agafonov B.P., Makarov S.A., i996. Debris flow areas in Pribaikalie. Geoekologiya (Geoecology] (2], 65-7i (in Russian] [Агафонов Б.П., Макаров С.А. Ареалы селевых потоков в Прибайкалье // Геоэкология. 1996. № 2. С. 65-7i].
Boudz M.D., i968. Conditions of debris flow formation in the Baikal region. In: Debris flows and mountain river processes. Academy of Sciences of Armenia Publishing House, Yerevan, p. 29i-296 (in Russian] [Будз М.Д. Условия селеобразования в Прибайкалье // Селевые потоки и горные русловые процессы. Ереван: Изд-во АН Армянской ССР, 1968. С. 291-296].
Fleischman S.M., i978. Debris Flows. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 3i2 p. (in Russian] [Флейшман С.М. Сели. Л.: Гид-рометеоиздат, i978. 3i2 с.].
Horton R.E., i945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin 56 (3], 275-370. http://dx.doi.org/i0.ii30/00i6-7606 (i945]56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2.
Kadetova A.V., Rybchenko A.A., Kozyreva E.A., Pellinen V.A., 20i6. Debris flows of 28 June 20i4 near the Arshan village (Siberia, Republic of Buryatia, Russia]. Landslides i3 (i], i29-i40. http://dx.doi.org/i0.i007/si0346-0i5-066i-7.
Laperdin V.K., Levi K.G., LekhatinivA.M., Kadetova A.V., Pellinen V.A., Rybchenko А.А., 20i4. Causes and consequences of catastrophic mudflows on 28 June 20i4 near Arshan village in the Republic of Buryatia, Russia. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics 5 (3], 799-8i6 (in Russian] [Лапердин В.К., Леви К.Г., Лехатинов А.М., Кадетова А.В., Пеллинен
B.А., Рыбченко А.А. Причины и последствия катастрофических селевых потоков 28 июня 2014 г. в окрестностях пос. Аршан, Республика Бурятия // Геодинамика и тектонофизика. 2014. Т. 5. № 3. С. 799-816]. http://dx.doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-3-0156.
Levi K.G., Zadonina N.V., Berdnikova N.E., Voronin V.I., Glyzin A.V., Yazev S.A., Baasandzhav B., Ninzhbadgar S., Balzhinnyam B., Buddo V.Yu., 2003. 500-year Chronology of Anomalous Phenomena in Nature and Society of Siberia and Mongolia. Irkutsk State Technical University, Irkutsk, 382 p. (in Russian) [Леви К.Г., Задонина Н.В., Берд-никова Н.Е., Воронин В.И., Глызин А.В., Язев С.А., Баасанджав Б., Нинжбадгар С., Балжинням Б., Буддо В.Ю. Современная геодинамика и гелиогеодинамика. 500-летняя хронология аномальных явлений в природе и социуме Сибири и Монголии. Иркутск: ИрГТУ, 2003. 382 с.].
Lvov A., Kropochev G., 1909. Summary of the research carried out near the Arshan settlement on the instructions East Siberian Branch of the Russian Geographical Society. Proceedings of the Siberian Department of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society 40, 41-77 (in Russian) [Львов А., Кропочев Г. Краткий отчет о результатах исследования Аршана, произведенного по поручению Восточно-Сибирского отделения Русского географического общества // Труды Сибирского отделения Императорского Русского географического общества. 1909. Т. 40.
C. 41-77].
MakarovS.A., 2012. Debris Flows in the Cisbaikalia. The V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS, Irkutsk, 111 p. (in Russian) [Макаров С.А. Сели Прибайкалья. Иркутск: Институт географии им. В.Б. Сочавы СО РАН, 2012. 111 с.].
Makarov S.A., Cherkashina A.A., Atutova Zh.V., Bardash A.V., Voropay N.N., Kichigina N.V., Mutin B.F., Osipova O.P., Ukhova N.N., 2014. Catastrophic Landslides in the Arshan Village of the Tunka District, Buryat Republic on June 28, 2014. The V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography, Irkutsk, 111 p. (in Russian) [Макаров С.А., Черкашина А.А., Ату-това Ж.В., Бардаш А.В., Воропай Н.Н., Кичигина Н.В., Мутин Б.Ф., Осипова О.П., Ухова Н.Н. Катастрофические селевые потоки, произошедшие в поселке Аршан Тункинского района Республики Бурятия 28 июня 2014 г. Иркутск: Институт географии им. В.Б. Сочавы СО РАН, 2014. 111 с.].
Melton M.A., 1965. The geomorphic and paleoclimatic significance of alluvial deposits in Southern Arizona. The Journal of Geology 73 (1), 1-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/627044.
Meteorological Monthly Magazine, 1972. Issue 22 (13). Irkutsk Hydrometeorological Center, Irkutsk (in Russian).
ParfeevetsA.V., San'kov V.A., 2006. Stress State of the Earth's Crust and Geodynamics of the Southwestern Part of the Baikal Rift System. Geo Academic Publishing House, Novosibirsk, 151 p. (in Russian) [Парфеевец А.В., Саньков В.А. Напряженное состояние земной коры и геодинамика юго-западной части Байкальской рифтовой системы. Новосибирск: Академическое изд-во «Гео», 2006. 151 c.].
Perov V.F., 2012. Mudflow Research. Study Guide. MSU Faculty of Geography, Moscow, 272 p. (in Russian) [Перов В.Ф. Селеведение. М.: Геогр. ф-т МГУ, 2012. 272 с.].
Shchetnikov A.A., Ufimtsev G.F., 2004. The Terrain Structure and Recent Tectonics of the Tunka Rift (Southwestern Pribaikalie). Nauchny Mir, Moscow, 160 p. (in Russian) [Щетников А.А., Уфимцев Г.Ф. Структура рельефа и новейшая тектоника Тункинского рифта (Юго-Западное Прибайкалье). М.: Научный мир, 2004. 160 с.].
Sumburgh A.L., 1971. Geological Map of the Soviet Union. 1:200000. East Sayan. Sheet M-48-I. Explanatory Note. Moscow, 88 p. (in Russian) [Самбург А.Л. Геологическая карта СССР. М-б 1:200000. Серия Восточно-Саянская. Лист М-48-I. Объяснительная записка. М., 1971. 88 с.].
Welsh A.J., 2007. Delineating Debris-Flow Hazards on Alluvial Fans in the Coromandel and Kaimai Regions, New Zealand, using GIS. Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury, Canterbury, 2007.
Wilford D.J., Sakals M.E., lnnes J.L., Sidle R.C., Bergerud W.A., 2004. Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics. Landslides 1 (1), 61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10346-003-0002-0.
Zonov B.V., 1962. Materials Concerning the Characteristics of Mudflows near the Arshan Resort Village in July 1962 (Visual Observation Data). Physical Geography Chair, A.A. Zhdanov Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, 32 p. (Irkutsk UGMS Funds) (in Russian) [Зонов Б.В. Материалы к характеристике селевых паводков в районе курорта Аршан в июле 1962 г. (по данным визуальных наблюдений). Иркутск: Иркутский государственный университет им. А.А. Жданова, кафедра физической географии, 1962. 32 с. (фонды Иркутского УГМС)].
Kadetova, Alena V., Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy, Researcher Institute of the Earth's Crust, Siberian Branch of RAS 128 Lermontov street, Irkutsk 664033, Russia e-mail: [email protected]
Кадетова Алена Васильевна, канд. геол.-мин. наук, н.с. Институт земной коры СО РАН 664033, Иркутск, ул. Лермонтова, 128, Россия e-mail: [email protected]
Rybchenko, Artem A., Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy, Senior Researcher Institute of the Earth's Crust, Siberian Branch of RAS 128 Lermontov street, Irkutsk 664033, Russia e-mail: [email protected]
Рыбченко Артем Александрович, канд. геол.-мин. наук, с.н.с. Институт земной коры СО РАН 664033, Иркутск, ул. Лермонтова, 128, Россия e-mail: [email protected]
Kozyreva, Elena A., Candidate of Geology and Mineralogy, Head of the Laboratory of Engineering Geology and Geoecology Institute of the Earth's Crust, Siberian Branch of RAS 128 Lermontov street, Irkutsk 664033, Russia Tel.: (3952)425899; e-mail: [email protected]
Козырева Елена Александровна, канд. геол.-мин. наук, зав. лабораторией инженерной геологии и геоэкологии Институт земной коры СО РАН 664033, Иркутск, ул. Лермонтова, 128, Россия Тел.: (3952)425899; e-mail: [email protected]
Yongbo Tie, Doctor degree in Engineering Geology
Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resource
No.2 Yihuanlu Beisanduan, Chengdu 610081, Sichuan Province, China
Tel.: +86 28 83231921; e-mail: [email protected]
Huayong Ni, Master degree in physical geomorphology
Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resource
No.2 Yihuanlu Beisanduan, Chengdu 610081, Sichuan Province, China
Tel.: +86 28 83231371; e-mail: [email protected]
