CC BY
131
Characteristics of TiO2 Compact Layer prepared for DSSC application
Nicholas Musila 1, Mathew Munji 1, Justus Simiyu 2, Eric Masika Raphael Nyenge Miriam Kineene 1
1 Kenyatta University
P. O. Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
2 University of Nairobi
P. O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
DOI: 10.22178/pos.39-6
LCC Subject Category: TP155-156
Received 16.09.2018 Accepted 24.10.2018 Published online 31.10.2018
Corresponding Author: Nicholas Musila [email protected]
© 2018 The Authors. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License EOL-
Abstract. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) offer an economically reliable and suitable alternative in moderating the challenges presented by the existing convectional photovoltaic cells. However, the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells has remained relatively low. For this reason, this research was aimed at studying the characteristics of TiO2 compact layer that can be applied in DSSCs as a way of improving efficiency. To achieve this, TiO2 compact layer was deposited on a conductive glass substrate by using Holmarc's Spray Pyrolysis system, using Ultrasonic Spray Head and spraying in the vertical geometry. X-ray Diffraction studies revealed that TiO2 compact layer was of anatase phase and had tetragonal crystalline structure. Raman spectroscopy showed that the most intense peak appeared at 142 cm-1 due to the external vibration of the anatase structure. Hall Effect studies revealed that TiO2 compact layer has a high density of charge carriers' value of 1.25 x 1019 cm-3 hence it can be used in DSSC applications.
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; compact layer; dye sensitized solar cell; morphology index; tetragonal crystalline structure; specific surface area; spray pyrolysis.
INTRODUCTION
Dye-sensitized nano-structured solar cells (DSSCs) present themselves as a viable alternative to fossil fuels and silicon-based solar cell technology in meeting the current state of energy demand [1]. They have a central role to play in providing renewable energy. The development of these solar cells generates not only a source of electricity but thermal energy as well from solar energy [2].
However, since DSSCs fabricated from TiO2 films were discovered, they have had low efficiencies compared to the other commercial solar cells [3]. Among other causes of low efficiency, the structure of the photo-anode electrode is one of the main sources. The nature of the coating on the photo-anode directly contributes on the solar cell performance due to the light harvesting capability, among other factors [4].
Since conversion efficiency of any solar cell is key to commercial competition in the market, there is
need to study characteristics of TiO2 compact layer, which can be introduced in between the photo-anode electrode and the hole-transport material, as a method of improving the performance of the solar cell [5]. In this study, the electrical, morphological and structural characteristics of TiO2 compact layer were studied.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
The TiO2 compact layer was deposited onto FTO glass substrates by Holmarc's Spray Pyrolysis system, using Ultrasonic Spray Head, spraying in the vertical geometry. The nozzle used ultrasonic atomization and was operated at a frequency of 40 kHz and its scan speed was 25 mm/s. The nozzle to substrate distance was kept constant at 15 cm, the substrate temperature was maintained at 450 °C and the deposition time was set at 1 minute. Pressurized air (at 6 bar) was used as shaping gas and the solution was sprayed with a rate of 2 ml/min.
The crystalline structure of TiO2 compact layer was investigated by X-ray diffraction, using a Bruker AXS D8 ADVANCE (Bruker Corporation of Germany). X-ray diffractometer was operated in a Bragg-Brentano configuration (Cu-Ka X-rays of wavelength (A) = 1.5406 A). XRD pattern of TiO2 compact layer was obtained for 2(6) angle between 10° and 80°. In order to quantify the particle size, the mean crystallite size (D) was estimated by applying the Scherrer equation to the strongest plane diffraction peak. D-spacing, specific surface area, morphology index, and dislocation density analyses were done from the XRD pattern obtained.
Confocal Raman microscope and spectrometer was used in Raman spectroscopy analysis of TiO2 compact layer. 514 nm wavelength argon ion laser was used in the excitation of the TiO2 compact layer. The analysis of the scattered light was done by a Jobin Yvon U1000 double monochro-mator while the Raman signal detection was done by a photomultiplier tube (PMT) whose resolution was less than 1 cm-1.
Digital flux/Gauss meter was used in the Hall Effect measurement where the Hall voltage (VH) and current (I) values of TiO2 compact layer were recorded upon the application of the magnetic field. The samples to be studied were mounted individually onto a printed circuit, clamped and attached to a stand placed between electromagnetic poles. The Hall voltage was measured in the z-axis direction, the current in the x-axis and the magnetic field in the y-axis direction. The Hall coefficient (RH), the density of charge carriers (nH) and Hall mobility (^H) of the TiO2 compact layer were calculated.
The samples were then mounted on a holder inserted in the scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Sigma VP FE-SEM). Coating using a slim layer of 20 nm to 30 nm of platinum was done to increase the conductivity and to prevent the build-up of high voltage charges of the thin films in the scanning electron microscope. The voltage was set at 2 kV and the working distance was set at 2.0 mm.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
XRD analysis of TiO2 compact layer
Figure 1 shows the measured and fitted XRD spectra of TiO2 compact layer. From the figure, there were seven XRD peaks. The first TiO2 peak was obtained at 25.83° at plane orientation (101). The most pronounced peak was found at
38.24° at plane orientation (103). These two major peaks confirmed that the prepared TiO2 compact layer had a pure anatase phase [6].
Figure 1 - XRD spectra of TiO2 compact layer for both measured and fitted data
There were other five peaks at 26 angle values of 48.53°, 51.94°, 54.37°, 55.54° and 61.99° respectively. These peaks were at plane orientations (004), (211), (105), (200) and (204) respectively which agreed well with Crystallography Open Database (COD) card number 96-152-6932 [7].
Particle size and the d-spacing of the TiO2 compact layer. As it is seen from Figure 1, the major XRD peaks had large intensity values which showed that the compact layer had tetragonal crystalline structure which had cell parameters a = 3.7710 A and I = 9.4300 A [7]. In addition, these peaks have broad diffraction which indicates small crystallite size [8]. The particle size of the peak with the highest intensity was 38.17 nm while the spacing between planes was found to be 2.3508 nm.
Figure 2 shows the diffraction broadening of the TiO2 film at 2 6 angle of 51.94°.
26 (degrees)
Figure 2 - Diffraction broadening of the TiO2 film at 20 angle of 51.94
A graph of intensity against angle 2 6 for the entire spectrum was drawn and all the seven peaks identified.
From Table 1, it was established that the peak at 61.99°, which had a plane orientation of (204),
had the highest FWHM value of 0.007198 radians. This peak is useful in the determination of the morphology index.
Table 1 - Particle size and the d-spacing for the TiO2 fi
m
Plane 20(o) Cos 0 Sin 0 FWHM (°) FWHM (Radian) ßCos 0 Size (nm) d-spacing (nm)
(101) 25.83 0.9747 0.2235 0.117 0.002042 0.001990 72.7299 3.4451
(103) 38.24 0.9448 0.3275 0.230 0.004014 0.003793 38.1670 2.3508
(004) 48.53 0.9116 0.4109 0.170 0.002967 0.002705 53.5170 1.8737
(211) 51.94 0.8990 0.4379 0.206 0.003595 0.003232 44.7850 1.7584
(105) 54.37 0.8895 0.4568 0.147 0.002566 0.002282 63.4294 1.6854
(200) 55.54 0.8848 0.4659 0.133 0.002321 0.002054 70.4792 1.6526
(204) 61.99 0.8572 0.5149 0.409 0.007138 0.006119 23.6569 1.4952
Specific Surface Area of TiO2 compact layer. The specific surface area values were calculated and tabulated in Table 2. Moreover, the surface area to volume ratio was also calculated. Table 2 shows that TiO2 compact layer had a high surface
area. High surface area was desired because it facilitates the interaction between TiO2 and the interacting media, like the dye to be used, which primarily happens on the surface or at the interface between the TiO2 and the dye.
Table 2 - Calculation of SSA of TiO2 compact layer
Size (nm) Surface area (nm2) Volume (nm3) SA to Volume Ratio (nm-1) Specific Surface Area (m2g-1)
72.7299 16,617.9 201,436.5 0.0825 21.8246
38.1670 4,576.411 29,111.28 0.1572 41.5884
53.5170 8,997.749 80,255.47 0.1121 29.6598
44.7850 6,301.092 47,032.44 0.1340 35.4427
63.4294 12,639.52 133,619.4 0.0946 25.0247
70.4792 15,605.37 183,309.5 0.0851 22.5215
23.6569 1,758.203 6,932.298 0.2536 67.0965
From Table 2, the graph of surface area to volume ratio against the particle size of the TiO2 compact layer was drawn. Figure 3 revealed that surface area to volume ratio and the particle size are inversely related meaning that as the particle size gets smaller, more surface becomes exposed and therefore the surface area increases. Negative gradient also meant that particle has pores which are a useful aspect in terms of dye adsorption into the TiO2 structure [9].
Morphology Index and dislocation density. As seen from Table 2, the morphology index values of TiO2 films ranged between 0.5 and 0.78.
35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Particle size (nm)
Figure 3 - Graph of surface area to volume ratio against size of particles
Figure 4 shows a linear fitting of the morphology index of TiO2 compact layer against the particle size. It was observed that MI varies directly as the particle size but with small deviations which confirmed the homogeneity and fineness of the prepared nanoparticles.
35 H->-1-T-1->-1-I-1-T-1-■-1-T-|-■-|-
0-62 0-64 0-66 0-68 0-70 0-72 0-74 0-76 0-78
Ml
Figure 4 - A linear fitting of TiO2 particle size against Morphology index
Figure 5 reveals that there exists an inverse relationship between the morphology index and the specific surface area. Just as for the case of the morphology index against the particle size, there
were small deviations between the fitted graph and the experimental points which was an indication that the prepared TiO2 compact layer had a good uniformity and fineness.
70
0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 Ml
Figure 5 - Linear fitting of SSA against MI of TiO2 nanoparticles
The results of the dislocation density were tabulated in Table 3.
Table 3 - Disloca tion density and Morphology index
FWHM Size Surface Area Volume Morphology Dislocation Density
(Radians) (nm) (nm2) (nm3) Index (m-2)
0.002042 72.7299 16,617.9 201,436.5 0.77756 1.890x1014
0.004014 38.1670 4,576.41 29,111.28 0.64005 6.865x1014
0.002967 53.5170 8,997.75 80,255.47 0.70638 3.492x1014
0.003595 44.7850 6,301.09 47,032.44 0.66503 4.986x1014
0.002566 63.4294 12,639.52 133,619.4 0.73560 2.486x1014
0.002321 70.4792 15,605.37 183,309.5 0.75460 2.013x1014
0.007138 23.6569 1,758.20 6,932.298 0.49999 1.787x1014
Table 3 shows that TiO2 compact layer had very high dislocation density in the orders of x 1014 meaning that this film had a good hardness since a large dislocation density means a larger hardness of the material. This was attributed to sintering of the sample.
Figure 6 shows a linear fitting of dislocation density against the particle sizes.
From figure 6, it was observed that dislocation density and the grain size relate inversely. It implies that the prepared TiO2 compact layer had more strength and hardness than their bulk (TiO2) counterpart [8].
1 H—■—i—i—i—■—i—■—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—■—i—
35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Particle size (nm)
Figure 6 - Dislocation density against the TiO2 grain sizes
Moreover, there were small deviations between the fitted graph and the experimental points which was an indication that the prepared T1O2 compact layer had a good film uniformity and fineness of the TiO2 grains.
Raman spectroscopy
Figure 7 shows Raman spectra of screen printed TiO2 thin films.
16000 -14000 12000 "5" 10000
cq
8000 -
'in
6000
tu
4000 2000 0 -
E„
A +B
/ 1 E B " " E„
V.0
-
Raman Shift (cm" )
Figure 7 - Plot for the Raman spectra of screen printed TiO2 thin films
From this figure, the Raman peaks were assigned as Eg, Eg, Big, Aig + Big and Eg modes of anatase phase. The first Eg peak was found at 142 cm-1 while the other Raman peaks were found at 195 cm-1, 395 cm-1, 517 cm-1 and 639 cm-1 respectively. These peaks agreed closely to peaks obtained in earlier studies [10] where peaks of 143 cm-1, 197 cm-1, 397 cm-1, 516 cm-1 and 637 cm-1 were reported.
The appearance of an intense peak at 142 cm-1 mode meant that there was a certain degree of long-range order possessed by the TiO2 nano-crystals [10]. It was the strongest peak and it was attributed to arise from the external vibration of the anatase structure. This peak was also broadened which was attributed to either phonon confinement effect or the surface pressure that is present in materials having sizes of nanometer scale [10].
Hall Effect studies of TiO2 compact layer
Hall voltage value of 3.62 V was obtained for the TiO2 compact layer thin film. It was established that this value was positive indicating that the film had a net positive carrier concentration. In TiO2, the holes served as the majority charge car-
riers in the films and this phenomenon was attributed to donor-type defects like the titanium (cation) interstitials and the oxygen vacancies
[11]. TiO2 has titanium vacancies in its structure and therefore its thin films has p-type properties
[12]. However, bulk TiO2 is an n-type semiconductor.
The TiO2 film had a Hall coefficient of 0.5 cm3/C. The thickness of the screen printed TiO2 compact layer thin film was taken to be 116 nm. The Hall coefficient value for TiO2 thin film agreed very closely with literature [13] where a value of 0.4.998 cm3/C was obtained to be the Hall coefficient of anatase TiO2 thin film.
By using Four-point probe system interfaced to a computer with Lab-view software and coupled with Keithley 2400 series source meter, the sheet resistance of the screen printed TiO2 nanoparti-cle thin films was obtained to be 6.052 x 104 ft/sq. This sheet resistance translated into resistivity value of 7.02 x 10-3 ft cm which was in agreement with the values reported in literature [14]. From this value of resistivity, the conductivity of the TiO2 thin film was 1.414 x 102 S/m and therefore the Hall mobility for TiO2 film was found to be 7.122 x 101 cm2/Vs. This Hall mobility for TiO2 compact layer was considered good and it greatly shows that the TiO2 films had high crystalline structure.
The final parameter to be calculated for the TiO2 compact layer thin film was the density of charge carriers. The density of charge carriers in the TiO2 compact layer was 1.25 x 1019 cm-3. Table 4 summarizes all the parameters studied under Hall Effect.
Table 4 - Summary of Hall Effect parameters of
Thickness Sheet Resistivity RH nH ßH
resistance (H cm) (cm3/C) (cm- (cm2/Vs)
(H/sq) 3)
116 6.052 x 7.02 x 10- 0.5 1.25 7.122 x
104 3 x 101
1019
SEM analysis. Figure 8 shows the micrograph of T1O2 compact layer. The film was relatively smooth because of the slight movement of the glass substrate during the spray pyrolysis deposition process, which was caused by the pressure of the spray. It was also noted that the TiO2 compact layer coated fully the FTO glass which was desirable in the fabrication of high efficient dye-sensitized solar cell.
CONCLUSION
Ti02 compact layer was successfully deposited onto FTO glass substrate using spray pyrolysis techniques. X-ray Diffraction studies revealed that Ti02 compact layer had tetragonal crystalline structure with cell parameters a = 3.7710 A and c = 9.4300 A. Raman spectroscopy showed that Ti02 compact layer had an intense peak at 142 cm4 mode meaning that there was a certain degree of long-range order possessed by the Ti02 nano-ciystals present in the compact layer. Hall Effect studies revealed that Ti02 compact layer has high density of charge carriers' value of 1.25 x 1019 cnr3. From these studies, it was concluded that Ti02 compact layer can be used as a
blocking layer in high performing dye-sensitized solar cells.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to acknowledge Botswana Institute for Technology Research and Innovation for the technical support during the SEM measurements of the samples and Physics department, University of Free State, South Africa for XRD measurements. In addition, this work was supported by the African Development Bank which provided the corresponding author with a scholarship which enabled these studies to be conducted.
REFERENCES
1. Panchal, H., Shah, K. & Padharia, M., (2015). Dye Sensitized Solar Cells - An Alternative to Silicon Based
Photovoltaic Technology. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2NeLy3H
2. Lewis, N. S., & Nocera, D. G. (2006). Powering the planet: Chemical challenges in solar energy
utilization. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences, 103[43), 15729-15735. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603395103
3. Omata, K, Kuwahara, S., Katayama, K, Qing S., Toyoda, T., Lee, K.-M., & Wu, C.-G. (2015). The cause
for the low efficiency of dye sensitized solar cells with a combination of ruthenium dyes and cobalt redox. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 17[15], 10170-10175. doi: 10.1039/c4cp05981f
4. Sengupta, D., Das, P., Mondal, B., & Mukherjee, K. (2016). Effects of doping morphology and film-
thickness of photo-anode materials for dye sensitized solar cell application - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 356-376. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.104
5. Kaur, R., Kim, K.-H., Paul, A. K., & Deep, A. (2016). Recent advances in the photovoltaic applications of
coordination polymers and metal organic frameworks. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 4(11), 3991-4002. doi: 10.1039/c5ta09668e
6. Antic, Z., Krsmanovic, R. M., Nikolic, M. G., Marinovic-Cincovic, M., Mitric, M., Polizzi, S., & Dramicanin,
M. D. (2012). Multisite luminescence of rare earth doped TiO2 anatase nanoparticles. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 135(2-3), 1064-1069. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.06.016
7. Weirich, T. ., Winterer, M., Seifried, S., Hahn, H., & Fuess, H. (2000). Rietveld analysis of electron
powder diffraction data from nanocrystalline anatase, TiO2. Ultramicroscopy, 81(3-4), 263-270. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3991(99)00189-8
8. Thirugnanasambandan, T., & Marimuthu, A. (2013). Titanium dioxide (TiO2) Nanoparticles -XRD
Analyses - An Insight. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244990066_Titanium_dioxide_Ti02_Nanoparticles_ XRD_Analyses_An_Insight
9. Wolfrom, R. (2012). Specifics on surface area. Retrieved from
https://www.particletechlabs.com/images/articles/specifics_on_surface_area.pdf
10. Gupta, S. K., Desai, R., Jha, P. K., Sahoo, S., & Kirin, D. (2009, September 15). Titanium dioxide
synthesized using titanium chloride: size effect study using Raman spectroscopy and photoluminescence. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy. doi: 10.1002/jrs.2427
11. Nguu, J., Aduda, B., Nyongesa, F., Musembi, R., Njogu, S., & Mwathe, P. (2015). Electrical
Characterization of Nano-Ti02/Nb205 Composite Thin Films Deposited Using Electrophoretic Deposition Technique. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, 2, 192-198.
12. Nowotny, M. K., Sheppard, L. R., Bak, T., & Nowotny, J. (2008). Defect Chemistry of Titanium
Dioxide. Application of Defect Engineering in Processing of Ti02-Based Photocatalysts. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 112(14), 5275-5300. doi: 10.1021/jp077275m
13. Tang, H., Levy, F. (1995). Electronic properties of anatase TiO2 investigated by electrical and optical
measurements on single crystals and thin films. Retrieved from https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/31789
14. Daniyan, A. A., Umoru, L. E., Fasasi, A. Y., Borode, J. 0., Oluwasegun, K. M., & Olusunle, S. 0. 0. (2014).
Electrical Properties of Nano-TiO2 Thin Film Using Spin Coating Method. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 02(01), 15-20. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2014.21003
