Научная статья на тему 'Architectural vocabulary of different cultures'

Architectural vocabulary of different cultures Текст научной статьи по специальности «Строительство и архитектура»

CC BY
212
16
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
CULTURAL IDENTITY / HERITAGE / ARCHITECTURAL VOCABULARY

Аннотация научной статьи по строительству и архитектуре, автор научной работы — Apeh Stanley Okwudili

Architecture and culture are tightly related to each other. In a sense, architecture is the carrier of culture. In recent years, marked by increasing globalization, the issue of preserving cultural heritage along with expressing cultural identity in contemporary architecture has become essential.Architecture and culture are tightly related to each other. In a sense, architecture is the carrier of culture. In recent years, marked by increasing globalization, the issue of preserving cultural heritage along with expressing cultural identity in contemporary architecture has become essential.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Architectural vocabulary of different cultures»

Гуманитарные науки

ARCHITECTURAL VOCABULARY OF DIFFERENT CULTURES

Apeh Stanley Okwudili

student construction university IMT ENUGU HND Abudja Abudja, Nigeria

Abstract: Architecture and culture are tightly related to each other. In a sense, architecture is the carrier of culture. In recent years, marked by increasing globalization, the issue of preserving cultural heritage along with expressing cultural identity in contemporary architecture has become essential.

Key words: cultural identity, heritage, architectural vocabulary.

The beginning of the twenty first century is marked by increasing globalisation and the affirmation of a singular identity that is in constant tension with traditional local identities. This trend has followed the spread of the international style during the second half of the twentieth century and has intensified as a result of the spread of globalisation as a dominating world view from the end of that century.

With the advent of modern equipments, machinery and following similar standards of construction, metropolitan reveal a great deal of similarities in the architecture of buildings. This is primarily due to increase in land price where builders find it more economical to erect a building then to construct one unit housing scheme. Another reason is to provide inhabitants with similar life style. Moreover, governments are adopting similar planning and construction footprints to ensure all housing schemes, multipurpose complex, offices and so on are developed on modern layout to save the environment from pollution, protect natives from furies of mother and so on.

However, these modern practices come up with their own challenges which can be rated good or bad for cities. Laudable arguments are that tourist feels homely, and people have same services and life style. On the other hand, these advancements are damaging the cultural heritage and iconic features of a city which stands out in the world and are taking away its pride and inimitability.

Architectural national identity of the peoples reflects characteristics and benefits falling under the influence of changes in world. Some characteristics gradually disappear under the influence of the West, causing chaos and confusion in the modern development. Modern architecture lacks the clear direction and goals of the society, as the architecture is the best means to transmit the state of society, but society is now more concerned about the material governmental things and it also introduces chaos into the architecture.

This article is based on the observation that in recent years the issue of cultural identity in contemporary architecture has become essential to creating uniqueness and local identity in a competitive environment on a global level. The biggest problem now is that architecture today is no longer a reflection of the uniqueness of the environment, because the trend toward urbanization leads to conflict in maintaining the minimum characteristics of the environment and the city, changes associated with rapid changes in the environment. The city's infrastructure has severely damaged and systematically distorted the heritage, and this is reflected in the nature of society. People become lost between loyalty to the heritage and transient fingerprints of modernity. As a result of technological and informational development in the beginning of the

205

twentieth century model architecture began to spread across the world and to obscure the individual features of cities in different countries, violating the privacy features and national identity in architecture. Western influence in the architecture led to a strong decline of the tradition and of human nature, turning the modern city into a set of mere geometrical blocks. Arrays of high-rise buildings and wide streets dominated architectural taste, washing away the features of values of the local people. The West has invaded our thinking and approaches to solving architectural problems. The result is confusion in the architecture and perhaps the most important reasons of this process are the loss of privacy and the continuity of the national heritage. There is a need to discuss a new political identity and privacy in architecture.

Architecture is a connection with the past. However, our concern is not for relics but for the revitalization of historic buildings, repurposing them for a new generation. Architecture can communicate memory, but it can also communicate values and a sense of place. Industrialised and developing countries have started to re-examine their traditions in a search for their own values and principles. Delanty and Jones [1] observed that in Europe 'architecture has become an important discourse for new expression of post-national identity in general and in particular for the emergence of a "spatial" European identity. No longer tied to the state to the same degree as in the period of nation-building, architecture has become a significant cultural expression of post-national identities within and beyond nation-state' [1]. This process has had an impact on the production of contemporary architecture and eventually triggered an intense discussion about how local identity should be created other than by copying fragments from the past.

The question of whether architecture should express a cultural identity is being investigated by many researchers in many parts of the world. Gospondini argues that 'in the process of economic and cultural globalisation, European integration and the blur of national identities in Europe, place-identity emerges as a central concern of both scholars and other people' [2]. In Singapore, architects vigorously adopted transformed and integrated traditions to reflect contemporary realities such as fast-evolving cultures, values and lifestyles. The notion of contemporary vernacular was developed. This can be defined as a conscious commitment to uncover a particular tradition's unique responses to spatial arrangements, place and climate and thereafter exteriorise these established and symbolic identities into creative forms.

Architecture can be best defined as the art and science of integrating the physical environment within a socio space-time organization. It can also be seen as a gesture and its insertion within any context should be aesthetically relevant. This argument raises the question of morality of architecture: that is considering architectural heritage in modern designs. Heritage sites are considered as our tangible and intangible identity and collective memory. It is sustained by remembering and what is remembered and what is remembered is defined by the assumed identity.

Innovation and traditions in architecture is a dialogue with the architectural legacy of the past, its vitality and potential scrap, a dialogue that takes into account past and harmoniously combines it with real.

Architectural heritage is important and worth preserving because it is the storehouse of memories, a link with the past, and because of its universal aesthetic and historic value. Memory is a dynamic process of using the past to define and redefine who we are, what we believe, what we like and dislike, and the values we hold dear. Therefore, the loss of heritage as storehouse of memories will lead to a loss of memory and then a loss of identity.

List of references:

1. Delanty, G., Jones, P. R. European Identity and Architecture / European Journal of Social Theory, 5 (4), 2002. - pp. 453-466.

2. Gospodine, A. Urban Design, Urban Space Morphology, Urban Tourism; an Emerging New Paradigm Concerning Their Relationship, European Planning Studies, 9, 2001. - pp. 925935.

UDC 504.06

ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS IN CANADA

Elena Galakhova

George Brown College Toronto, Canada

Abstract: The article presents an overview of environmental problems in Canada and the ways they are dealt with on individual and governmental level.

Key words: environmental issues, awareness, protection.

As environmental concerns, such as air and water pollution and resource depletion, grew as a result of increasing economic activity and a growing human population, so did concerns about the anthropogenic effects on the natural environment in relation to other issues such as health and well-being, poverty, and social and economic development. Global environmental change—resource degradation, desertification, water scarcity, rising sea levels, increasingly frequent natural disasters—is already profoundly affecting economic and political stability around the world. Population growth, increasing consumption and climate change are likely to intensify these pressures. The geopolitics of the twenty-first century may well be the geopolitics of scarcity—of land, of food, of water, of energy.

People in Canada are gradually becoming more aware of the urgent need to protect the environment. Growing awareness of environmental problems has resulted in more governmental regulations. Environmental law addresses the relationship between humans and the physical environment, and is an area of law with both domestic and international implications. It is a complex and interlocking body of treaties, conventions statutes, regulations, and common law that operates to regulate the interaction of humanity and the natural environment, toward the purpose of reducing the impacts of human activity. Environmental law draws from and is influenced by environmental principles, such as ecology, conservation, stewardship, responsibility, and sustainability.

Canada is blessed with an abundance of land, oceans and lakes. In contrast to other countries, especially those with developing economies, Canada's environment issues may seem trifling. The vast majority of Canadians enjoy fresh air and water. Yet are we living beyond our means, extracting more from our environment than is sustainable? What is the price of our prosperity on nature? What can we do better today to ensure future generations of Canadians have a healthy environment? As Canadians, it is our environment. It is our responsibility to steward and our responsibility to meet today's challenges.

Canadians are involved with many projects to protect fragile ecosystems and stop further environmental destruction. Some projects are individual efforts and some are carried out through Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) such as World Wildlife Federation and Greenpeace. Still, environmental education has to start at home. Educate and practice, that is the only way it can be inculcated into the psyche of people. We all have to contribute to it, not only the government. Individuals are directly rewarded for exploiting the environment, but the costs of this exploitation are shared among the larger current and future population. So the change has to come in the way people start thinking about it.

Many of us believe that we should protect the environment for ethical reasons, thinking that we have a responsibility to preserve the ecosystem for future generations and that animals have a right to live. But we can also give dollars and cents reasons for environmental action by quantifying the benefits a healthy environment provides for mankind. These benefits are of four

kinds: the direct provision of resources; the regulation of natural systems; aeshetic reasons; and recreational opportunities.

Climate change is perhaps the most obvious and highest-profile environmental issue today, whose effects can be shown to hurt us economically. However, other environmental problems also have clear economic and social costs.

Species extinction is reducing the genetic diversity of the planet, putting us at greater risk of catastrophic declines in the health of certain ecosystems (such as rainforests). This in turn makes the whole planet less resilient to change, potentially hurting our own species in the future.

Resource depletion at unsustainable rates means that future generations of humans will have less material to work with to build and maintain their civilization.

In poorer countries - and in Canada's north - poverty caused by drier and warmer climates and reduced wildlife is leading to social stress that may result in violence directed at wealthier people.

Over-fishing and damage to coastal and reef environments are leading to a potentially catastrophic decline in the amount of fish available to feed people worldwide.

Invasive plants and animals are hurting agriculture and aquaculture.

Air pollution and poisoning from heavy metals and other mining and manufacturing waste is a direct threat to human health.

Environmental law in Canada applies to businesses across virtually all sectors of the economy and all regions of the country. The federal and ten provincial governments, as well as the three territorial governments, are active in the creation and evolution of environmental law to meet the changing environmental challenges of the day, such as: climate change, toxic substances management, waste reduction, urban renewal through brown fields redevelopment, and the facilitation of environmental assessments of infrastructure and renewable energy projects.

Canadian environmental law will continue to evolve to keep pace with the times. Water management challenges, adaption to climate change, and the interconnection of environmental regulation and global trade, promise to be the issues of the immediate future. A large and diversified country, with a significant industrial base, a wealth of natural resources in mining, forestry and fisheries, large expanse of agricultural lands, coastal frontage on three oceans, arctic and subarctic territories, Canada is sensitive to virtually the full range of environmental issues facing the planet. Canadians are now as environmentally aware as most other advanced nations, but our dependence on natural resources as the primary driver of our economy means that we continue to exploit our forests, seas and lands in ways that worry many of us, although for most Canadians the equation of "environment versus economy" will still usually be resolved in favour of the economy.

The negative effects of our exploitation can be mitigated in many ways: in the oceans, through sustainable fisheries and avoiding harmful trawling practices; in the forests, by avoiding clearcutting, and mandatory replanting policies; in mining, through mandatory soil remediation and strict rules for tailings ponds; in oil and gas extraction through carbon capture technologies which are currently under development. There are immediate costs to all of these technologies and best practices; however, it has been proven time and time again that the long-term costs of fixing environmental problems after they have happened is far greater than that of mitigating them at the outset.

Canada has never been a leader in developing best practices for the environmental impact of our natural resource industries, but we are gradually improving, and the education and advocacy work of many of the charities is pushing us in the right direction.

List of References:

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_Canada, Accessed on December 6, 2016.

2. http://www.acc.com/legalresources/quickcounsel/elic_rjs.cfm, Accessed on December 4, 2016.

3. http://www.blakes.com/pdf/EnvLawOntCan.pdf, Accessed on November 13, 2016.

4. http://www.tc2.ca/pdf/H3_Environmental.pdf, Accessed on December 23, 2011.

URBANIZATION PROBLEMS IN KINGSTON

Natalie Davis

Green Island high school Jamaica, Kingstone

Abstract: Urbanization is the process by which cities and towns develop and grow into larger areas. It includes the movement of people from rural to urban areas as well as movements among towns and cities. As will now be discussed, this process is a popular phenomenon that has not only dominated Jamaica, but other developing and more developed countries of the world.

Key words: urbanization, rural and urban areas.

Empirical data suggests that urbanization has been on the rise in the small island territory of Jamaica. In Jamaica, Kingston has been identified as the city with the largest urban concentration. Such high population growth rates mean increased reliance on the natural environment, particularly in the urban area where density is most significant.

Even though cities are considered as the 'engines' of economic development, failure to manage the impacts of rapid urbanization provides a threat to the health of human beings, as well as environmental quality and urban productivity.

According to Davis-Mattis [3], approximately two thirds of Jamaica's population live in coastal towns and cities. High and rapid levels of urbanization have led to major problems such as traffic congestion resulting from poor infrastructure, contributing to environmental pollution and urban decay. Moreover, inadequate social services and poor housing are consequences of overpopulation and high population densities, often leading to the proliferation of squatters in major cities.

This scenario is often times intensified when high housing prices force people who are in the lower income strata away from the formal land market and towards illegal squatter settlements frequently situated in forbidden, environmentally sensitive areas; usually state-owned, yet seldom monitored. Bernstein [1] argues that compared to other urbanized lands, these areas are usually most vulnerable to natural and anthropogenic hazards. Research has shown that deforestation for residential purposes along with 'slash and burn' farming by agricultural squatters in watershed areas have led to the degradation of 17 out of the 26 existing watersheds in the island; eventually leading to a reduction in fresh water resources.

This can also be attributed to poor land management practices and inadequate institutional arrangements by the state. Tinidigarukayo [5] adds that rapid urban growth along with the inadequate provision of housing facilities has resulted in the increasing presence of informal settlements along gullies and on river banks in Jamaica. Clarke [2] describes an unsightly 'rash of huts' appearing along the flanks of the lower part of the Sandy Gully - one of the main drainage systems implemented in the Kingston Metropolitan Area (K.M.A.). Squatters are then faced with the challenge of proper garbage and sewage disposal as the majority of these shacks do not have access to proper disposal facilities. This then leads to waste being disposed in gullies or nearby water channels, as this method would seem to be a feasible way of getting rid

209

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.