CC BY
35
GEOGRAPHY — —
APPROACHES TO THE DEFINITION OF THE BALTIC SEA REGION
A. P. Klemeshev1 V. S. Korneevets1 T. Palmowski T. Studzieniecki G. M. Fedorov1
1 Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University.
14 A. Nevski St., Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia
2 Gdansk University
4 Bazynskiego st., Gdansk, 80—952, Poland
3 Gdynia Maritime University 81—87 Morska st., Gdynia, 81—225, Poland
Submitted on July 10, 2017
doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2017-4-1
© Klemeshev A. P., Korneevets V. S., Palmowski T., Studzieniecki T., Fedorov G.M., 2017
The Baltic Sea region is one of the most developed and well-formed regions of international cooperation. It is a place for promoting collaboration between businesses, non-profits, public authorities, and municipalities of the countries located on the Baltic Sea coast and its adjacent territories. The Baltic Sea region has both unresolved problems and potential for development. This necessitates the identification of the Baltic Sea region territory having a capacity for the efficient development of mutually beneficial intergovernmental and international ties. A thorough overview of research literature, the implementation of international programmes and initiatives of international and intergovernmental organisations, and the application of the method of cartographic analysis have contributed to defining the territory of the Baltic region. The analysis shows three spaces that differ in the effect of the Baltic Sea on their territorial development. This approach proposes three definitions of the Baltic Sea region — a narrow, an extended, and a broad one, each serving a different purpose and being characterised by a different density of internal connections. According to the narrow definition, the region comprises the whole territories of Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia and the coastal parts of Russia, Germany, and Poland. The extended definition adds the remaining part of Poland, most Russian and German regions, and Belarus and Norway. The broad definition of the Baltic region incorporates Iceland, some territories of Russia, Germany, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Ukraine.
Key words: Baltic Sea region, Baltic sea, catchment area, coastal zones, zones of attraction, international cooperation
Baltic Region. 2017. Vol. 9. № 4. P. 4—20.
1. The scope of the concept of the Baltic Sea
The term "the Baltic Sea" was probably first used in the 11th century by German chronicler Adam of Bremen for describing a part of today's Baltic Sea [39]. Over time, the meaning of the term "Baltika" has changed, and many new terms denoting the Baltic Sea have emerged (see Table 1).
Table 1
The Term "Baltic Sea" in Selected Languages
No. Language Term Meaning
1 English Baltic Sea Baltic Sea ("the sea of the Balts")
2 Belorussian Baltyjskaje Mora
3 Latvian Baltijas jûra
4 Lithuanian Baltijos jûra
5 French Mer Baltique
6 Spanish Mar Báltico
7 Polish Morze Baltyckie
8 Russian Baltiyskoye More
9 German Ostsee Eastern Sea
10 Danish 0stersoen
11 Norwegian 0stersjoen
12 Swedish Ostersjon
13 Finnish Itameri
14 Icelandic Eystrasalt
15 Estonian Laanemeri Western Sea
Source: own research.
The Baltic Sea is an inland one, as it is connected to the North Sea and then to the Atlantic Ocean not directly but by narrow straits of Oresund, the Great Belt, the Little Belt, the Kattegat, and the Skagerrak. However, no clear consensus exists on the subject of the maritime boundaries of the Baltic Sea. It can be seen as such — without any straits (Variant 1, Fig. 1). However, for practical purposes, straits are often considered to be a part of this sea. Therefore, it is widely believed that the North Sea includes Skagerrak, while the Baltic Sea includes all the other Danish straits. Nevertheless, there are different opinions on the placement of the demarcation line between the Skagerrak and the Kattegat (Variants 2 and 3, Fig. 1). Sometimes the Baltic Sea even includes the Skagerrak (Variant 4, Fig. 1).
From the perspective of the BSR composition, it is expedient to draw its boundary between the Kattegat and the Skagerrak. This way, the rivers flowing into the Kattegat Strait can be considered the rivers of the Baltic Sea basin. Variants 3 and 4 in the legend to Figure 1 reflect this idea. In alternative 5 the Baltic Sea includes the Skagerrak.
Fig. 1. Maritime Boundaries of the Baltic Sea
Sources: 1) [1; 21]; 2) [27; 37; 74]; 3) [16]; 4) [28; 57].
2. Physiographic definitions of the Baltic Sea Region
2.1. Delimitation of the Baltic Sea Catchment Area
From the physiographic point of view, the Baltic Sea Catchment Area is a starting point for defining the BSR [55; 74; 82].
The size of the Catchment Area can vary considerably depending on which (if any) of the Danish straits the author includes into the Baltic Sea (Fig. 2). According to Brogmus, it has an area of 1,634,000 km2 [80], Mikul-ski claims it is 1,721,000 km2 [26], and S.V. Korotkova's estimation is 1,721,233 km2 [9]. In HELCOM publications it is both 1,740,000 km2 [36] and 1,720,270km2 [35]. The latter is the most frequently used figure. [45; 59; 63; 76].
Catchment area
- Common part
.......Variant A - Variant C
.......... Variant B -------Variant D
Fig. 2. The Baltic Sea Catchment Area A — the Baltic Sea without the Danish straits according to [1] B — with the Kattegat strait according to [3; 74] C — with the Kattegat strait according to [16] G — with the Skagerrak strait according to [57; 73]
The Baltic Sea Catchment Area includes the territory of 14 countries. Nine of them border the Baltic Sea (Russia, Germany, Poland, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia), Norway borders only the Danish straits, while four others (Belarus, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Ukraine) are not situated on the Baltic coast. The largest part of the Catchment Area (93.2%) is located in the countries adjacent to the Baltic Sea. Figure 3 shows the size of the Baltic Sea Catchment Area in each of these countries. The largest share is in Sweden (26.6%), the smallest is in Slovakia (0.1%). Germany has the smallest share of the Catchment Area among the countries bordering the Baltic sea (14.3 %).
Slovakia Czech Republic Ukraine Norway Germany Denmark Estonia Latvia Lithuania Belarus Finland Poland Russia Sweden
50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000
Catchment area, km2
Fig. 3. The Baltic Sea Catchment Area broken down by countries Source: [45].
2.2. Definition of 50- and 200-km zones of attraction of the Baltic Sea
The proximity of the sea is one of the major factors determining population distribution and influencing territorial development. Most authors identify two zones of attraction of the sea. One is a 50-km coastal zone directly and thus strongly affected by the sea, and a 200-km zone with indirect impact dominating outside the 50-km zone [2; 3; 12; 17; 18; 20; 44; 51].
Figure 4 shows both of these zones of the Baltic Sea (with its water boundary being the borderline between the Kattegat and the Skagerrak straits according to Helcom, the Baltic Sea Programme 2007—2013, see Fig. 3).
0
r GERMANY \ ' POLAND
1 ■■--. ' -
Fig. 4. 50- and 200-km coastal zones of the Baltic Sea
It can be observed that although the 50-km zone covers only a part of the territory of the countries bordering the Baltic Sea, five out of nine capitals of the respective countries (Copenhagen, Stockholm, Helsinki, Tallinn, Riga) and one former capital (St. Petersburg) are located within it.
The 200-km zone is comprised of the entire territory of Denmark and the Baltic countries (Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia), most of the territory of Sweden and Finland, but only parts of the territory of Russia, Germany, and Poland. It is clear that the first six countries are significantly affected by the Baltic Sea, while only some parts of the other three countries are under its strong influence.
3. Criteria for the delimitation of the socio-economic Baltic region
The authors agree with Hakanson [34], who argues that the borders of the BSR can sometimes be widened and sometimes narrowed depending on the subject and the objects of a particular study. As M^czak and Sam-
sonowicz put it, when determining the boundaries of the region, one should use not a clear line, but rather a fading colour [47]. Theoretically, that may be correct, since the basis for the identification of a coherent (connected) socio-economic region is the study of internal relations between its elements (economic entities, settlements, etc.). "Clots" of such links are the nuclei of these regions with no clear boundaries. Yet for practical purposes, it is always helpful to denote the boundaries of a region as clearly as possible.
The BSR includes territories located on or in close proximity to the coast. They are strongly linked to the sea by economic relations, cultural ties, regular leisure trips of residents, etc. The borders of the region determined on such basis are vague, and thus its composition may be open to interpretation.
The BSR itself can be considered as the core of a broader socio-economic community consisting of the states of the Baltic region. There are 9 countries adjacent to the Baltic sea: Russia, Germany, Poland, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. They form the core of a number of international organizations, such as the Council of the Baltic Sea States (CBSS). The latter also includes Norway and Iceland, with some neighbouring countries having observer status.
Figure 5 shows the ratio between the territories of the Baltic Sea Catchment Area, as well as the 50-and 200-km coastal zones, on the one hand, and the BSR and the states of the Baltic region, on the other hand.
Fig. 5. Physiographic approaches to the delimitation of the Baltic region
Regions are usually defined and delimited from the perspective and for the needs of a specific field of research or the economy, so the criteria for their definition and delimitation can vary significantly. In some cases, criteria used in different approaches can merge, and we can speak about an interdisciplinary approach to the delimitation of regions (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6. Interdisciplinary criteria for delimitation of the Baltic Sea Region
Some criteria for the delimitation of the Baltic Sea Region specific to different disciplines but applied within the general interdisciplinary approach and used individually or in various combinations in a number of works [4— 8; 10; 11; 13—15; 19; 22—25; 29—33; 40—43; 46—50; 52—54; 56; 58; 60—62; 64; 65; 67—72; 77—79; 82], include:
— location at the Baltic Sea or near it;
— shared natural environment;
— joint environmental management;
— shared history;
— relations between a specific territory and the Baltic Sea;
— operational areas of international organizations and eligible areas of international programmes;
— joint pieces of legislation;
— close economic ties;
— cultural ties, cultural identity;
— transnational character;
— military security cooperation;
— counterterrorism cooperation;
— shared "Baltic" brand.
4. International cooperation as a factor in the formation of the Baltic Sea Region
A number of bilateral treaties between countries, the Union of the Baltic cities, and various trade associations (Baltic Ports Organization, Baltic Sea Tourism Commission, the Helsinki Commission — HELCOM — aimed at environment protection, Baltic Sea Chambers of Commerce Association, etc.) contribute significantly to the consolidation of the region. Links between neighbouring countries are fostered by Euroregions, the associations of municipalities and administrative-territorial units.
A great many organizations have the word "Baltic" in their names. The studies conducted in 2016 by Belgian institute "The Union of International Associations" identified 218 such entities (Tab. 2). 95 of them can be classified as "Baltic", i. e. involving entities located in the BSR.
Table 2
Organizations with the word "Baltic" in their names in the UIA database (Union of International Associations) in 2016
Status Criterion Number Total
Non-classified organizations Organizations which have ceased or suspended their activity 59 123
National organizations 40
Organizations not classified due to other reasons 24
Classified organizations Organizations gathering entities from all the countries situated around the Baltic Sea 6 95
Organizations with members only from selected countries situated around the Baltic Sea Organizations with members only from the 3 "Baltic republics" 51
Other organizations 15
Organizations with members from all the countries situated around the Baltic Sea and other countries 23
Total 218 218
Source: own work based on [75] and the websites of the organizations.
The key role in defining the BSR is played by two programmes: VASAB, "Visions and Strategies around the Baltic Sea", and Interreg, "Trans-European co-operation intended to encourage harmonious and balanced development".
VASAB unites 11 countries cooperating in the area of spatial planning and development (Fig. 7). It is steered by the Committee on Spatial Planning and Development of the Baltic Sea Region (CSPD/BSR), with representatives of relevant ministries of cooperating countries as well as regional authorities of the countries whose territory is not fully covered by VASAB (Germany, Russia).
Interreg is a programme of the European Union. Non-EU countries (Russia, Belarus, Norway) participate in some of its projects by co-financing activities with their own resources. Geographically it covers larger territory than VASAB programme as it includes the entire North-West Federal District of the Russian Federation, while VASAB does not cover the Republic of Komi, the Vologda and the Arkhangelsk regions, and the Nenets Autonomous District.
Fig. 7. VASAB and Interreg areas
Sources: [38; 81].
5. The Baltic Sea region in the narrow, extended and broad sense
With the distance from the sea growing, its influence on the socioeconomic development of the regions is decreasing, thus it is possible to identify several zones of its influence on the economy and population distribution. Figure 8 shows three circles of influence of different sizes (Fig. 8, tab. 3).
The first one comprises the territories located on the coast of the Baltic sea or in direct proximity to it. Their characteristic features are a developed maritime sector, the use of maritime transport for the needs of the economy, and the use of the seaside for recreational purposes. It has strong socioeconomic, political and demographic internal ties, so we can talk about an established territorial system — the Baltic Sea Region in a narrow sense. At the same time, there are at least two ways of establishing its eastern borders. The first only includes the Russian territories of St. Petersburg, the Leningrad and the Kaliningrad regions ("Narrow A" in Table 3). The second adds Novgorod and the Pskov regions to the BSR, since these are tightly connected with Saint-Petersburg ("Narrow B" in Tab. 3).
Fig. 8. Triple delimitation of the Baltic Sea Region
Table 3
The Baltic Sea region in the narrow, extended and broad sense and the zone of its indirect influence
Sense Composition
Narrow A Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, the states of Germany: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Schleswig-Holstein, the Voivodships of Poland: West Pomeranian, Warmian-Masurian, Pomerania; the subjects of the Russian Federation: Saint Petersburg, the Leningrad and the Kaliningrad regions
Narrow B The above, and: the Novgorod and the Pskov regions of the Russian Federation
Extended A (VASAB) Poland, Belarus, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia; the states of Germany: MecklenburgVorpommern, Schleswig-Holstein, Berlin, Brandenburg, Bremen, Hamburg, Lüneburg; the subjects of the Russian Federation: St. Petersburg, the Leningrad, the Kaliningrad, the Novgorod, the Pskov, the Murmansk regions, the Republic of Karelia
Extended B (Interreg) The above, and: the Republic of Komi, the Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions, the Nenets Autonomous District
Broad All of the above, and Iceland and other territories of Russia, Germany, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Ukraine.
The second circle of influence of the Baltic Sea includes the territories where spatial planning is carried out within the framework of VASAB and Interreg programmes. This territory can be considered the extended Baltic Sea region. It incorporates the narrow Baltic Sea region, which in a way forms the core of the extended region. It can coincide either with VASAB or Interreg areas, thus its size can vary. These 2 alternatives are also stated under letters "A" and "B" respectively.
The third circle has no clear boundaries, it experiences only the indirect influence of the Baltic Sea. Its boundaries may be close to the boundaries of the Baltic Sea Catchment Area. And they can also go beyond these boundaries if Iceland, which is part of the Council of the Baltic Sea States, is included. This is the Baltic Sea region in its broad sense.
In addition, as indicated above, the region can be considered as a sum of its states, i. e. the member-countries of the Council of the Baltic Sea States.
Conclusion
It is difficult to give an unambiguous definition of the Baltic Sea region since it is heterogeneous in terms of language, religion, culture, and history, and is highly diversified in terms of the environment and the economy. Economic and cultural cooperation, joint measures of marine environment protection, spatial harmonization, and sustainable development provide a framework for international and interregional cooperation promoting the integration within the region. The Baltic Sea Region is an experimental platform for transnational and cross-border cooperation at many levels, allowing to develop new concepts and strategies and create a lot of opportunities for development. Since this view differs from the others in breadth, the proposal to delimit the BSR on the basis of the concept of three circles seems to be justified. However, due to the ambiguous definition of its boundaries, every time the term Baltic Sea region is used it is necessary to specify its territory.
The research was carried out in 2017 supported by the grant of the Russian Geographical Society "47. Russian Baltic: state, problems, prospects".
References
1. Atlas okeanov: Atlanticheskii i Indiiskii okeany [Atlas of the Oceans: The Atlantic and Indian Oceans], 1977, Moscow, 333 p. (In Russ.)
2. Bezrukov, L. A. 2008, Kontinental'no-okeanicheskaya dikhotomiya v mezhdu-narodnom i regional'nom razvitii [Continental-oceanic dichotomy in international and regional development], Novosibirsk, 369 p. (In Russ.)
3. Druzhinin A. G., Lachininsky S. S., Krasnov A. I., Sorokin I. S., 2016, Polarization of the settlement system in the coastal zone of the Leningrad Region in 1989—2015, Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Severo-Kavkazskii region. Se-riya: estestvennye nauki [News of higher educational institutions. North-Caucasian region. Series: natural sciences], no. 3 (191), p. 58—65. (In Russ.)
4. Gumenyuk, I. S., Melnik D. A. 2012, The transnational territorial transport system of the Baltic Region, Balt. Reg., Vol. 4, no. 1, p. 66—71, doi: 10.5922/20798555-2012-1-8.
5. Gutnik, A. P., Klemeshev, A. P. (eds.) 2006, Baltiiskii region kak polyus ekonomicheskoi integratsii Severo-Zapada Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Evropeiskogo so-yuza [The Baltic region as a pole of economic integration of the Northwest of the Russian Federation and the European Union], Kaliningrad, 392 p. (In Russ.)
6. Zauha, Ya., Fedorov, G.M., Limonov L.E., Oding, N. Yu. (eds.) 2008, Seve-ro-Zapad Rossii v regione Baltiiskogo morya: problemy i perspektivy ekonomiches-kogo vzaimodeistviya i sotrudnichestva [North-West Russia in the Baltic Sea Region: Problems and Prospects for Economic Cooperation and Cooperation], Kaliningrad, 259 p. (In Russ.)
7. Klemeshev, A.P. 2016, Baltic Sea Region Studies: Current Trends (Based on Publications in the Baltic Region Journal), Balt. Reg., Vol. 8, no. 3, p. 4—10.
8. Korneevets, V. S. 2008, The concepts of "The Baltic Sea Region and the Baltic Region", Cosmopolis, no. 2 (21), p. 68—77. (In Russ.)
9. Korotkova, S. V. 2008, On the geoecological features of the Baltic Sea basin, Problemy regional'noi ekologii [Problems of regional ecology], available at: http:// naukarus.com/o-geoekologicheskih-osobennostyah-basseyna-baltiyskogo-morya (accessed 15.06.2017). (In Russ)
10. Kuznetsova, T. Yu. 2013, Tendencies and factors of demographic development in the Baltic region, Regional'nye issledovaniya [Regional research], no. 3, p. 50—57. (In Russ)
11. Lanko, D.A. 2014, The Baltic region in international politics: to the question of modeling the process of regionalization, Studia Humanitatis Borealis, no. 1 (2), p. 30—41. (In Russ)
12. Lachininskii, S. S., Lachininskii, A.S., Semenova, I.V. 2016, The geoeco-nomic factor in formation of spatial structure of the St. Petersburg coastal area, Regional Research of Russia, Vol. 6, no. 4, p. 323—331.
13. Mezhevich, N. M. 2003, The Baltic region: constructivist specifics and political results. 2003, Megaregion — Network Confederation, available at: http:// net-conf.org/articles_text_6.htm (accessed 12.02.2016). (in Russ)
14. Mezhevich N.M., Kretinin G.V., Fedorov G.M. 2016, Economic and Geographical Structure of the Baltic Sea region, Balt. Reg., Vol. 8, no. 3, p. 11—21. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2016-3-1.
15. Mikhailov, A. S. 2014, Geography of international clusters in the Baltic region, Balt. Reg, Vol. 6, no. 1, p. 113—123. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2014-1-10.
16. Natsional'nyi atlas Rossii [Natsional'nyi atlas Rossii], 2004, T. 2, Moscow, 495 p. (in Russ.)
17. Pokshishevskii, V. V. 1979, Geografiya rasseleniya na beregakh mirovogo okeana [Geography of settlement on the shores of the world ocean], Leningrad, 342 p. (in Russ.)
18. Pokshishevskii, V. V., Fedorov, G. M. 1988, The fundamentals of population geography and settlement within the World Ocean. In: Geografiya okeana: teo-riya, praktika, problemy [Geography of the ocean: theory, practice, problems], Leningrad, p. 148—161. (in Russ.)
19. Sergunin, A. A. 2013, Russia and the European Union in the Baltic region: a treacherous path to partnership, Balt. Reg., no. 4, p. 38—47. doi: 10.5922/20798555-2013-4-4.
20. Slevich, S.B. 1988, Okean, resursy i khozyaistvo [Ocean, resources and economy], Leningrad, 189 p. (in Russ.)
21. North-West Department for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring, available at: http://www.meteo.nw.ru/articles/index.php?id=532 (accessed 17.07.2017) (in Russ.)
22. Fedorov, G.M., Zverev, Yu.M., Korneevets, V. S. 1997, Rossiiskii eksklav na Baltike [Russian exclave in the Baltic Sea], Kaliningrad, 312 p. (in Russ.)
23. Fedorov, G.M., Zverev, Yu.M., Korneevets, V.S. 2013, Rossiya na Baltike: 1990—2012 gody [Russia in the Baltic: 1990—2012], Kaliningrad, 252 p. (in Russ.)
24. Fedorov, G.M., Korneevets, V.S. 1999, Baltiiskii region [Baltic Region], Kaliningrad, 207 p. (in Russ.)
25. Fedorov, G. M., Mikhailov, A. S., Kuznetsova, T. Yu. 2017, The influence of the sea on the economic development and settlement structure in the Baltic Sea region, Balt. Reg., Vol. 9, no. 2, p. 4—18. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2017-2-1.
26. Dolina dolnej Wisfy, 1981. Gdansk, Gdanskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Wyd-zial V — Nauk o Ziemi, 125 p.
27. Efficien sea, Baltic Sea Programme 2007—2013, available at: http://www. efficiensea.org/default. asp?Action=Details&Item=485 (accessed 17.07.2017).
28. ESPON (European Observation Network, Territorial Development and Cohesion, 2013, ESaTDOR European Seas and Territorial Development, Opportunities and Risks, report 25 April, available at: http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/ Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/ESaTD0R/FR_160413/ESaTD0R_Main_ Report.pdf (accessed 17.09.2016).
29. Fedorov, G.M, Korneevets, V.S, Tarasov, I.N., Chasovskiy, V.I. 2016, Russia among the Countries of the Baltic Region, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, no. 6 (4), p. 1502—1506.
30. Flotow, L., Mentzel, T. 1998, The Baltic Sea Region: Business and Industry, Politics, Developments and Trends, Hagbarth Publications.
31. Gorka-Winter, B. 2002, Miejsce panstw baltyckich w europejskiej architek-turze bezpieczenstwa — perspektywy, Biuletyn — Polski Instytut Spraw Miqdzyna-rodowych, no. 46, p. 479—482.
32. Gimbutas, M. 1965, Bronze Age Cultures in Central and Eastern Europe, Paris, The Hague, London.
33. Grzelakowski, A. 2010, Region Morza Baltyckiego — strategie rozwoju, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecinskiego, no. 589; Ekonomiczne Problemy Us-lug, no. 49, p. 16—36.
34. Hakanson, L. 1991, Charakterystyka fizycznogeograficzna zlewiska Morza Baltyckiego. Srodowisko Morza Baltyckiego, Uppsala, Uniwersytet w Uppsali.
35. HELCOM, 1997. Airborne Pollutions Loads to The Baltic Sea, 1991—1995, Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings, no. 69, p. 8.
36. HELCOM. 2007. Climate Change in the Baltic Sea Area. HELCOM Thematic Assessment in 2007, Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings, no. 111, p. 10.
37. Flusseinträge und direkte Einträge in die Ostsee, 2016, Umwelt Bundesamt, available at: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/gewaesserbelastung/ostsee/ flusseintraege-direkte-eintraege-in-die-ostsee#textpart-1(accessed 17.07.2017).
38. Interreg, available at: https://www.interreg-baltic.eu/about-the-programme/ area.html (accessed 17.07.2017).
39. Kasekamp, A. 2010, A history of the Baltic States, New York, Palgrave McMillan.
40. Kenig-Witkowska, M. 2011, Miqdzynarodowe Prawo Srodowiska wybrane zagadnienia systemowe, Warszawa, 312 p.
41. Kisiel-Lowczyc, A.B. 2000, Baltycka integracja ekonomiczna: stan i perspektywy do 2010 r., Warszawa.
42. Kivikari, U., Antola, E. 2004, Baltic Sea Region — A Dynamic Third of Europe, 2nd edition, Turku, 35 p.
43. Kizielewicz, J. 2012, Wspólpraca mi^dzynarodowa w Basenie Morza Bal-tyckiego na rzecz rozwoju turystyki morskiej, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Gdyni, no. 77, p. 27—40.
44. Kurt, S. 2016, Analysis of Temporal Change Taking Place at the Coastline and Coastal Area of the South Coast of the Marmara Sea, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 15, no. 3, p. 899—924.
45. Laane, A., Kraav, E., Titova, G. 2005, Global International Water Assessment. Baltic Sea, GIVA Regional Assessment, Nairobi, United Nations Environment Programme.
46. Lach, Z. 2012, Geopolityczne aspekty ksztaltowania przestrzeni bezpieczen-stwa panstwa, Przeglqdgeopolityczny, Vol. 5, p. 9—40.
47. M^czak, A., Samsonowicz, H. 1962, Z zagadnien genezy rynku europej-skiego: strefa baltycka, Przeglqd historyczny, no. 52/2, p. 198—222.
48. Makarychev, A., Sergunin, A. 2017, Russia's role in regional cooperation and the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR), Journal of Baltic Studies, Special Issue, p. 1—15.
49. Moilannen, T., Rainisto, S. 2008, How to Brand Nations, Cities and Destinations: A Planning Book for Place Destination, New York, Palgrave Mcmillan, 202 p.
50. Olejniczak, K. 2008, Mechanizmy wykorzystania ewaluacji Studium ewa-luacji sredniookresowych INTERREG III, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
51. Pak, A., Majd, F. 2011, Integrated coastal management plan in free trade zones, a case study, Ocean and Coastal Management, no. 54, p. 129—136.
52. Paliepa, J. 2011, The origin of the Baltic and Vedic Languages Baltic Mythology Interdisciplinary Treatise, Bloomington, Author House.
53. Palmowski, T. 2003, Delimitacja regionu Europy Baltyckiej, Wymiar i wspólczesne interpretacje regionu, Poznan, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, p. 253—261.
54. Palmowski, T. 1999, Region baltycki — próba delimitacji. In: Loboda, J.., Grykien, S. (eds.) Przeksztaicenia regionalnych struktur funkcjonalno-przestrzen-nych, Wroclaw, Instytut Geograficzny, Uniwersytet Wroclawski, p. 141—155.
55. Palmowski, T. 2010, Strategia UE dla regionu Morza Baltyckiego jako ko-lejny krok ku integracji baltyckiej. In: Ciok, S., Migon, P. (eds.) Przeksztaicenia struktur regionalnych: aspekty spoieczne, ekonomiczne i przyrodnicze, Wroclaw, Instytut Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego, p. 361—372.
56. Piskozub, A. 2009, Euroregiony w Europie Baltyckiej. In: Studzieniecki, T. (ed.) Granice, wspóipraca i turystyka w Europie Baityckiej, Lubieszynek, Gdynia, p. 13—33.
57. Potts, T., O'Higgins, T., Hasings, E. 2012, Oceans of opportunity or rough seas? What does the future hold for developments in European marine policy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 370, no. 1980, p. 5682—5700. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0394.
58. Pye, D. 2005, Supraregion Morza Baltyckiego. In: Brodecki, Z. (ed.) Regio-ny, Warszawa, p. 338—350.
59. Richling, A., Ostaszewska, K. 2005, Geografía turystyczna Polski, Warsza-wa, 188 p.
60. Riedel, J. 2010, Supranacjonalizacja bezpieczenstwa energetycznego w Europie. Podejscia teoretyczne, Warszawa, Centrum Europejskie Natolin.
61. Runiewicz- Jasinska, R. 2014, Mi^kkie bezpieczenstwo w Regionie Morza Baltyckiego, Rocznik Stowarzyszenia Naukowców Polaków Litwy, no. 13—14, p. 278—298.
62. Samsonowicz, H. 1968, Pôzne sredniowiecze miast nadbityckich: studia nad dziejami Hanzy nad Baitykiem w XIV—XV w, Warszawa.
63. Schernewski, G., Neumann, T. 2005, The trophic state of the Baltic Sea a century ago: a model simulation study, Journal of Marine Systems, no. 53, p. 109—124.
64. Szulc, M. 2013, Wielopoziomowe Zarz^dzanie a region Morza Baltyckiego. In: Ruszkowski, J., Wojnicz, L. (eds.) Multi-level governance w Unii Europejskiej, Szczecin-Warszawa, Instytut Politologii i Europeistyki Uniwersytetu Szczecinskiego Instytut Europeistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, p. 281—292.
65. Smigerska-Belczak, I. 2012, Wspolpraca w regionie morza baltyckiego — Rada Panstw Morza Baltyckiego, Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Spoiecznego Studia i Prace, no. 1, p.175—198.
66. Stigebrandt, A. 2001, Physical oceanography of the Baltic Sea. In: Wulff, F.V., Rahm, L., Larsson, P. (eds.) A Systems Analisys of the Baltic Sea, Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer Verlag.
67. Studzieniecki, T. 1995, Baltycka Wspolpraca tuystyczna, CzasMorza, no. 65.
68. Studzieniecki, T. 2009, Ewolucja wspolpracy w Europie Baltyckiej. In: Studzieniecki, T. (ed.) Granice, wspôipraca i turystyka w Europie Baityckiej, Gdynia, p. 60—73.
69. Studzieniecki, T., Kurjata, E. 2010, Destination Branding in the Baltic Europe, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Seria: Oeconomia, Vol. 9, no. 4, p. 519—529.
70. Szymanska, A. 2015, Fundusze unijne i europejskie... czyli jak nie oszalec w drodze po srodki pomocowe Unii Europejskiej, Gliwice.
71. Teichmann, E., Wenesa, M. 2005, Rozszerzona Unia Europejska i jej wschod-ni sqsiedzi, Warszawa.
72. Teska, J. 2014, Wspolpraca gospodarcza determinantem budowy zaufania i bezpieczenstwa w Regionie Morza Baltyckiego, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Mary-narki Wojennej, Vol. LII, nol. 1 (184), p. 139—152.
73. The Baltic Sea catchment basin, Baltex, available at: http://www.baltex-research.eu/background/catchment.html (accessed 17.07.2017).
74. Maciejewski, W. (ed.) 2002, The Baltic Sea Region. Cultures, Politics, Societies, Uppsala, 676 p.
75. UIA (Union of Intenational Organisations), available at: http://www.uia. org/ybio?name=baltic (accessed 17.07.2017).
76. UN Atlas of Oceans, available at: http://www.oceansatlas.org (accessed 28.08.2016).
77. Waever, O. 1993, Culture and Identity in the Baltic. In: Joenniemi, P. (ed.)
Cooperation in the Baltic Sea, Washington, p. 23—50.
78. Waldzinski, D. 2010, Znaczenie relacji miçdzy nature i kulturç w rozwoju Europy Baltyckiej, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecinskiego, no. 589.
79. Wielowiejski, J. 1980, Giôwny szlak bursztynowy w czasach Cesarstwa Rzym-skiego, Warszawa.
80. Wiadomosci SiuzbyMeteorologicznej, 1973. no. 93, 10 p.
81. VASAB, available at: http://www.vasab.org/index.php/about-vasab (accessed 17.07.2017).
82. Zaleski, J., Wojewodka, C. 1977, Europa Baitycka. Zarys monografii gos-podarczej, Wroclaw, Warszawa, Krakow, Gdansk.
The authors
Prof Andrei P. Klemeshev, Rector, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia.
E-mail: [email protected]
Prof Valentin S. Korneevets, Director of the Institute of Recreation, Tourism and Sports, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia.
E-mail: [email protected]
Prof Tadeusz Palmowski, Head of Department of Regional Development Geography, University of Gdansk, Poland.
E-mail: [email protected]
Prof Tomasz Studzieniecki, Senior Lecturer, Department of Hotel and Tourism Management, Gdynia Maritime University, Poland.
E-mail: [email protected]
Prof Gennady M. Fedorov, Director of the Institute of Nature Management, Spatial Development, and Urban Planning, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia.
E-mail: [email protected]
To cite this article:
Klemeshev A.P., Korneevets V.S., Palmowski T., Studzieniecki T., Fedorov G. M. 2017, Approaches to the Definition of the Baltic Sea Region, Balt. Reg., Vol. 9, no. 4, p. 4—20. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2017-4-1.
