CC BY
0UDC 621.9
Kopylov Alexey
Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies
Russia, Saint Petersburg
ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN
MACHINE ENGINEERING
Abstract: This article analyzes the effectiveness of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies in machine engineering. It highlights the advantages of AM, including high material utilization, reduced production time, and enhanced design flexibility, compared to traditional methods. Key challenges, such as high setup costs and material limitations, are also discussed. The integration of AM with digital design tools, such as computer-aided design and generative design algorithms, is emphasized as a critical factor driving innovation and mass customization. Quantitative data in two comprehensive tables demonstrate AM's superiority in material efficiency and waste reduction, particularly for high-cost materials like titanium and advanced composites. The findings underline AM's transformative potential, despite existing challenges, and suggest that its future lies in integrating with advanced technologies like robotics and IoT for optimized manufacturing processes.
Keywords: additive manufacturing, machine engineering, digital design tools, material efficiency, 3D printing.
INTRODUCTION
Additive technologies, commonly referred to as 3D printing, have revolutionized manufacturing processes, especially in machine engineering. These technologies enable the production of complex geometries, reduce material waste, and improve time-to-market for new designs. With advancements in materials science and manufacturing techniques, additive technologies have transitioned from prototyping tools to integral components of industrial production.
The aim of this article is to analyze the effectiveness of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies in machine engineering. By focusing on metrics such as cost-efficiency, production speed, and material utilization, the study evaluates the advantages and limitations of AM compared to traditional manufacturing methods. The study further discusses the integration of AM with digital design tools and its impact on innovation in machine engineering.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING METHODS
Additive manufacturing has distinct advantages over traditional methods, such as subtractive machining and casting. Key benefits include reduced lead times, high customizability, and the ability to create intricate designs that are impossible to achieve through conventional methods [1]. However, AM is not without limitations, such as lower mechanical strength in certain materials and high initial setup costs.
Table 1 presents a comparative analysis of key performance indicators (KPIs) for traditional manufacturing and additive manufacturing in machine engineering.
Table 1. Comparative analysis of manufacturing methods
in machine engineering
Metric Traditional manufacturing Additive manufacturing Cost efficiency Customizability
Material utilization (%) 50-60 90-95 moderate low
Lead time (days) 20-30 5-10 high high
Production cost ($/unit) 50-100 30-60 variable high
Design complexity limited unlimited moderate very high
Setup cost ($) low high high high
This table highlights the differences between traditional and additive manufacturing methods in terms of material utilization, production efficiency, and cost. While AM excels in customizability and material efficiency, traditional methods remain competitive in terms of setup costs and mechanical strength for large-scale production.
Material efficiency is one of the standout advantages of additive technologies. By building parts layer by layer, AM significantly reduces material waste compared to traditional subtractive methods, which remove excess material through cutting or milling. This efficiency is particularly beneficial for high-cost materials such as titanium and advanced composites, often used in machine engineering.
Table 2 explores the material utilization and waste generation for different manufacturing methods across various materials used in machine engineering.
COLD SCIENCE_№11/2024_ХОЛОДНАЯ НАУКА
Table 2. Material utilization and waste generation for different manufacturing methods
Material Subtractive waste (%) Additive waste (%) Cost per kg ($) Utilization rate (AM) Environmental savings
Aluminum 40 5 4.5 95 % high
Steel 35 10 2.8 90 % moderate
Titanium 60 5 25.0 95 % very high
Advanced composites 50 2 120.0 98 % very high
Plastics (ABS, PLA) 30 1 1.5 99 % high
This table compares the waste generated and material efficiency of subtractive and additive manufacturing for commonly used materials in machine engineering. Additive technologies show a significant reduction in waste, especially for high-cost materials like titanium and advanced composites.
The integration of AM with digital design tools has brought about a paradigm shift in the field of machine engineering. CAD and simulation software now play a pivotal role in streamlining the AM process, allowing engineers to create intricate designs with high precision [2, 3]. These tools enable the visualization, optimization, and testing of complex geometries before the actual production process begins, reducing the risk of errors and material waste.
One of the key advantages of this integration is the ability to conduct iterative design processes. Engineers can quickly modify designs based on feedback from simulations or performance tests. This flexibility accelerates the development cycle and ensures that the final product meets stringent performance requirements. Additionally, the use of generative design algorithms allows for the creation of optimized structures that use minimal material while maintaining strength and functionality, which is especially beneficial for lightweight applications in aerospace and automotive industries [4].
Furthermore, the combination of AM and digital design tools supports the concept of mass customization. Unlike traditional manufacturing methods, where custom designs can significantly increase production costs, AM allows for the efficient
production of personalized components. This capability is particularly valuable in sectors such as medical device manufacturing, where patient-specific implants and prosthetics are in high demand. By leveraging digital design tools, manufacturers can seamlessly adapt designs to individual requirements, improving both functionality and patient outcomes.
Despite these benefits, challenges remain in fully integrating digital design tools with AM [5]. Compatibility issues between software platforms, the steep learning curve for engineers unfamiliar with advanced simulation tools, and the computational requirements for handling complex designs are significant barriers. Overcoming these challenges will require continued advancements in software development and greater collaboration between AM technology providers and software developers.
AUTOMATION AND SCALABILITY IN AM
The integration of automation into AM processes has opened new possibilities for scalability and efficiency in machine engineering. Automation reduces human intervention, ensuring consistent quality and repeatability across production runs. This is particularly significant for industries where precision and reliability are paramount, such as aerospace and medical device manufacturing [6].
One of the key advancements in this area is the development of automated material handling systems. These systems streamline the supply of raw materials to 3D printers, reducing downtime and optimizing production schedules. For example, automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS) ensure that materials are delivered to printers just in time, minimizing waste and enhancing operational efficiency. Additionally, automated post-processing solutions, such as cleaning and finishing, further improve the overall production cycle [7, 8].
Scalability in AM is another critical factor driving its adoption in industrial production. As demand for additive technologies grows, manufacturers are implementing solutions such as multi-printer arrays and cloud-based monitoring systems. These technologies allow for parallel production, enabling the production of large quantities of components without compromising quality or increasing costs.
Moreover, cloud-connected AM systems facilitate remote monitoring and diagnostics, ensuring efficient resource allocation and reducing maintenance downtime.
Despite these advancements, challenges remain in scaling AM technologies for mass production. Issues such as print speed, machine reliability, and compatibility with diverse materials must be addressed to fully realize the potential of automation in AM. However, ongoing research and development efforts are rapidly overcoming these barriers, positioning AM as a scalable and efficient alternative to traditional manufacturing methods.
CONCLUSION
The analysis demonstrates that additive technologies have revolutionized the field of machine engineering by providing enhanced design flexibility, improved material efficiency, and faster production cycles. These advancements, supported by digital design tools, allow manufacturers to achieve unprecedented levels of customization and innovation. The ability to produce complex geometries and reduce material waste makes AM a sustainable and efficient alternative to traditional methods.
However, challenges such as high initial setup costs, material limitations, and integration issues with existing software platforms must be addressed to maximize the potential of AM technologies. Collaboration between industry leaders, software developers, and researchers will be critical to overcoming these barriers and advancing the field further. By resolving these challenges, AM can transition from a complementary technology to a primary method in industrial production.
Looking ahead, the future of additive technologies lies in their integration with advanced manufacturing systems, including robotics, IoT, and AI. This synergy will enable real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and optimization of production processes. As the technology matures, it is poised to redefine machine engineering, driving innovation and efficiency across industries.
REFERENCES
1. Gibson I., Rosen D. W., Stucker B., Khorasani M. Additive manufacturing technologies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 2021. Vol. 17. P. 160-186.
2. Armstrong M., Mehrabi H., Naveed N. An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology // Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2022. Vol. 84. P. 1001-1029.
3. Qin J., Hu F., Liu Y., Witherell P., Wang C. C., Rosen D. W. Research and application of machine learning for additive manufacturing // Additive Manufacturing. 2022. Vol. 52. P. 102691.
4. Al Rashid A., Khan S. A., Al-Ghamdi S. G., Ko? M. Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment // Automation in Construction. 2020. Vol. 118. P. 103268.
5. Khorasani M., Ghasemi A., Rolfe B., Gibson I. Additive manufacturing: A powerful tool for the aerospace industry // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2022. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 87-100.
6. Jin Z., Zhang Z., Demir K., Gu G. X. Machine learning for advanced additive manufacturing // Matter. 2020. Vol. 3. No. 5. P. 1541-1556.
7. Chen Y., Peng X., Kong L., Dong G., Remani A., Leach R. Defect inspection technologies for additive manufacturing // International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing. 2021. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 022002.
8. Johnson N. S., Vulimiri P. S., To A. C., Zhang X., Brice C. A., Kappes B. B., Stebner A. P. Invited review: Machine learning for materials developments in metals additive manufacturing // Additive Manufacturing. 2020. Vol. 36. P. 101641.
