CC BY
3УДК 620.1
Ashimova A.M. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0403-318X
Master's student of Architecture International Educational Corporation Kazakh Head Architecture and Construction Academy (Almaty, Kazakhstan)
Nurkusheva L.T. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3262-4777
Doctor of Architecture International Educational Corporation Kazakh Head Architecture and Construction Academy (Almaty, Kazakhstan)
INTEGRATING PROGRAMMABLE MECHANICAL METAMATERIALS IN INDUSTRIAL DESIGN EDUCATION
Abstract: this research explores the integration of Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials (PMMs) into industrial design education through the interdisciplinary frameworks of Interdisciplinary Design Thinking for Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials (IDTPMM) and Interdisciplinary Design Methods for Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials (IDMPMM). PMMs represent an innovative class of materials with programmable properties such as stiffness and adaptability, offering immense potential for applications in fields like architecture, product design, and adaptive systems. Despite their advances in engineering and material science, PMMs' potential in design education remains underexplored.
This study demonstrates how the inclusion of PMMs into educational curricula fosters innovation, enhances creativity, and addresses real-world design challenges. The research employs case studies from architecture and product design to highlight the impact of PMMs on sustainable design solutions, reducing material waste, and enhancing material adaptability. The results indicate significant improvements in students ' problem-solving abilities, creativity, and interdisciplinary collaboration when working with PMMs.
Key challenges encountered include the steep learning curve associated with the technical complexity of PMMs and the need for accessible resources and tools for prototyping. The findings suggest that PMMs offer considerable benefits in design education and have broader implications for sustainable and adaptive design in professional practice. Recommendations for future research
1526
include further refinement of PMM technologies, expanding interdisciplinary educational frameworks, and investigating long-term sustainability impacts.
Keywords: mechanical metamaterials, design thinking, interdisciplinary education, industrial design, architectural applications, sustainability, adaptive materials.
Introduction.
Programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) have emerged as a groundbreaking innovation in material science, offering the ability to precisely control mechanical properties such as stiffness, deformation, and multistability in response to external stimuli. These materials differ from traditional ones in their capacity to be designed and programmed to perform specific mechanical functions, making them highly versatile for applications in fields such as robotics, adaptive structures, and biomedical devices. As research into PMMs has expanded over the last two decades, their relevance to engineering, architecture, and design has also grown, positioning them as a key technology for future developments. Despite these advancements, their full potential in design education, particularly in industrial design programs, remains largely underexplored.
The integration of PMMs into design education represents a significant shift in how materials are used in the creative process. Traditionally, designers have adapted existing materials to suit their project needs, often constrained by the inherent properties of those materials. PMMs, however, introduce the possibility for designers to actively influence material behavior during the design phase, expanding the scope for innovation. This shift aligns well with the goals of interdisciplinary design thinking (IDTPMM), which encourages problem-solving through the integration of multiple disciplines, such as mechanical engineering, material science, and industrial design. By incorporating PMMs into educational curricula, design students can engage with cutting-edge technologies, fostering a more dynamic and innovative approach to solving real-world design challenges.
Despite the exciting potential of PMMs, there is a notable gap in the research regarding their application in design education. While extensive studies have examined
their mechanical properties and technical applications in engineering and robotics, few have investigated how these materials can be utilized in industrial design programs to promote interdisciplinary learning and innovation. The current body of research lacks a systematic approach for incorporating PMMs into design thinking frameworks, particularly in educational settings. This research seeks to fill that gap by developing a comprehensive model that integrates PMMs into industrial design education, highlighting the potential for these materials to not only enhance the learning experience but also to foster sustainability and creative problem-solving.
The objective of this study is to propose a structured methodology for the integration of PMMs into industrial design curricula, using interdisciplinary methods such as IDTPMM to encourage collaboration and innovation. By examining case studies that demonstrate the practical application of PMMs in design, this research will show how these materials can be used to address complex design challenges in sustainable and innovative ways. The article is structured as follows: a review of the relevant literature on PMMs, interdisciplinary design thinking, and educational methodologies a detailed explanation of the research methodology used, including the IDTPMM framework an analysis of case studies that illustrate the practical application of these concepts and a discussion of the findings and their implications for future research in design education. Through this structured approach, the study aims to bridge the gap between material science and design, offering new possibilities for the future of industrial design education
Literature Review.
Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials (PMMs).
Programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) have garnered significant attention over the last two decades, establishing themselves as one of the most innovative fields in material science. Unlike conventional materials, PMMs allow for the dynamic manipulation of mechanical properties, such as stiffness, deformation, and multistability, in response to external stimuli like heat, light, or mechanical force. Researchers such as Bertoldi et al. (2017) and Kadic et al. (2019) have contributed
foundational work, particularly in the areas of kirigami and origami-based PMMs, laying the groundwork for future research on their programmable characteristics.
Further advancements have explored the use of PMMs in a range of applications, from robotics and biomedical devices to architectural solutions. Jae-Hwang Lee et al. (2012) provided detailed analyses of the mechanical properties of metamaterials, while Yu et al. (2018) focused on lattice metamaterials and their tunable mechanical properties. The ability to program materials at both macro and micro levels has positioned PMMs as a crucial tool for multidisciplinary applications.
Interdisciplinary Design Thinking.
The integration of PMMs into design thinking is essential for fostering innovation in industrial design education. The concept of interdisciplinary design thinking (IDTPMM) merges fields such as material science, mechanical engineering, and industrial design, enabling students to develop a deeper understanding of complex problem-solving processes. Research by Liu et al. (2024) emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary methods in leveraging PMMs to create innovative solutions in design and architecture.
Educators in industrial design programs have increasingly adopted project-based learning (PBL) and interdisciplinary approaches to teach students how to utilize advanced materials like PMMs. This approach encourages students to think creatively and holistically, blending scientific principles with design innovation. The benefits of incorporating interdisciplinary design thinking into education are evident in its ability to equip students with the skills necessary to navigate the challenges posed by rapidly evolving material technologies (Meng et al., 2022).
Sustainability in Design Education.
One of the key opportunities presented by the use of PMMs in design is their contribution to sustainable practices. Sustainable design focuses on minimizing environmental impact through thoughtful material selection and process optimization. In the context of industrial design education, integrating PMMs offers a unique opportunity to enhance sustainability efforts by developing materials with tailored, programmable properties that reduce waste and resource consumption.
Scholars like Vezzoli and Manzini (2008) have long advocated for sustainability in design education, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. The adoption of PMMs can further this cause by providing students with hands-on experience in creating materials that can adapt to environmental conditions, thereby promoting sustainability at both the educational and practical levels (Daraojimba et al., 2024).
Gaps and Opportunities.
While significant strides have been made in the study of PMMs, there is a noticeable gap in research related to their systematic incorporation into design education. Although the mechanical properties of PMMs have been well documented, the application of these materials within an educational framework, particularly in industrial design programs, remains underdeveloped. The current literature focuses primarily on the technical aspects of PMMs, with little attention paid to how they can be used as a pedagogical tool for interdisciplinary learning (Liu et al., 2024).
This research aims to fill that gap by providing a comprehensive model for integrating PMMs into design education, leveraging interdisciplinary design thinking to foster innovation. By addressing the limitations of existing approaches and offering new strategies for incorporating PMMs into curricula, this study opens up new avenues for both research and practical applications in industrial design education.
Methodology.
Research Approach.
This study adopts an interdisciplinary approach to develop and integrate programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) into industrial design education. The core methodology revolves around the grafting method, which facilitates the transfer of concepts and techniques from material science and mechanical engineering into design thinking. The interdisciplinary design thinking (IDTPMM) and interdisciplinary design methods (IDMPMM) frameworks form the basis of this research, which are enhanced by interdisciplinary methodologies such as combinatorial evolutionary thinking and analogical knowledge transfer.
The grafting method is the core of the research process. It involves transferring principles and techniques from one field to another to stimulate innovation. Specifically, the "high to low" vertical grafting method transfers advanced principles from material science, such as the mechanical properties of PMMs, into the design process to foster innovation. This method ensures that cutting-edge advancements in material research can be applied in practical design contexts, allowing design students to engage with cutting-edge technologies in a systematic and accessible way.
Process Models: IDTPMM and IDMPMM.
The IDTPMM framework organizes design thinking into a non-linear process that includes several key steps: demand analysis, ideation, prototyping, testing, and implementation. This methodology integrates PMMs as dynamic, programmable materials capable of adjusting their mechanical properties based on design requirements. By incorporating PMMs into the design process, students can shift from passive material use to active manipulation of material properties, encouraging more innovative and sustainable design solutions.
The IDMPMM framework builds on IDTPMM by introducing a systematic method for applying PMMs to real-world design challenges. This method emphasizes practical applications of PMMs in design, from constructing unit cells and analyzing mechanical properties to developing prototypes for architectural and industrial projects. IDMPMM allows designers to program material behavior, leading to more adaptable, sustainable design solutions. The process model, as seen in IDTPMM, allows iterative development, where each stage can feed back into earlier steps to improve the final product.
Case Studies and Application.
This study selects two case studies from the fields of architecture and product design to illustrate the practical application of PMMs. These case studies highlight how PMMs can be used to solve complex design challenges by introducing programmable materials that respond dynamically to environmental stimuli. By testing PMMs in real-world scenarios, the case studies demonstrate the practical benefits of integrating advanced material science with design thinking in education .
Tools and Techniques.
The analogical knowledge transfer method complements the grafting method by enabling the transformation of knowledge from one discipline to another. Instead of merely copying material science principles, this method adapts those principles to fit the context of design education, making them accessible to students and educators. Combinatorial evolutionary thinking further supports this process by encouraging the combination of previously unrelated concepts, leading to new insights and approaches in both design and material science.
In summary, the methodology leverages interdisciplinary research methods and process models to create a comprehensive framework for integrating PMMs into industrial design education. By using the grafting method alongside analogical knowledge transfer and combinatorial evolutionary thinking, this study establishes a robust foundation for the application of advanced material technologies in design curricula.
Results.
1. Overview of Findings.
The integration of programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) into industrial design education, facilitated through the interdisciplinary frameworks of IDTPMM (Interdisciplinary Design Thinking for Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials) and IDMPMM (Interdisciplinary Design Methods for Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials), has demonstrated significant success in enhancing both educational outcomes and design innovation. These frameworks provided a structured, yet flexible approach to incorporating cutting-edge materials into the design process, allowing students and educators to move beyond conventional material limitations.
A critical outcome of this integration was the transformation in how students approached material behavior and functionality. Rather than treating materials as static, passive elements, students engaged with PMMs as dynamic components, capable of responding to environmental stimuli or user interaction. This shift in perspective empowered students to explore more innovative solutions to design problems, actively programming the behavior of materials to fit specific project requirements. By
leveraging the inherent adaptability of PMMs, students were able to prototype and test designs that would have been impossible using traditional materials.
The interdisciplinary nature of the IDTPMM and IDMPMM frameworks also fostered collaboration between different fields of study. Students in industrial design worked closely with peers and instructors from engineering and material science disciplines, leading to a richer, more comprehensive educational experience. This collaboration encouraged a systems-thinking approach, where students considered not only the form and aesthetics of their designs but also the underlying mechanical and material principles that governed their functionality. This holistic understanding of design challenges equipped them with the tools to address complex, real-world problems more effectively.
Additionally, the application of PMMs in educational contexts enhanced the practical, hands-on learning experience. Students gained firsthand experience in manipulating advanced materials and witnessed how theoretical principles of mechanics, physics, and design could be applied to tangible outcomes. The iterative nature of the IDTPMM framework—where students continuously cycled through ideation, prototyping, testing, and refining—reinforced a process-oriented approach that emphasized experimentation and real-time problem-solving. As a result, students not only gained technical proficiency in working with PMMs but also developed stronger creative and critical thinking skills, which are essential for modern design practices.
In summary, the integration of PMMs using the interdisciplinary frameworks of IDTPMM and IDMPMM successfully bridged the gap between material science and design education. It allowed for a deeper engagement with both the technological and creative aspects of design, fostering innovation, collaboration, and a more comprehensive understanding of how materials can be utilized in dynamic and sustainable ways.
2. Application of PMMs in Case Studies.
Case Study 1: Architecture.
In the first case study, programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) were applied in an architectural project aimed at designing adaptive building facades capable of responding to environmental changes. The challenge in this project revolved around creating a structure that could regulate light, temperature, and ventilation dynamically, reducing energy consumption while enhancing occupant comfort. Traditional materials were insufficient for achieving this level of adaptability, necessitating the exploration of PMMs.
The interdisciplinary design team utilized the properties of PMMs to develop facades with programmable stiffness and deformation capabilities. By adjusting the material's configuration in response to stimuli such as sunlight and heat, the facade could shift between different structural forms, optimizing energy efficiency throughout the day. The use of PMMs allowed for the creation of a kinetic facade system that responded in real-time to environmental conditions, demonstrating a significant departure from static architectural solutions.
This project highlighted the ability of PMMs to address complex design challenges that traditional materials could not overcome. The programmable nature of the metamaterials enabled innovations in both aesthetics and functionality, as the facade's changing form was not only practical but also visually striking. Additionally, the integration of PMMs reduced the need for external mechanical systems, as the material itself provided the necessary adaptability. This case study illustrated how PMMs could redefine architectural design by offering flexible, self-adjusting solutions that enhance both performance and sustainability.
Case Study 2: Product Design.
In the second case study, PMMs were applied within a product design curriculum, focusing on the development of adaptive consumer products. The project tasked students with designing a product that could change shape or function based on user needs, with an emphasis on sustainability and material efficiency. The challenge
was to create a product that could perform multiple functions while minimizing material waste and maximizing user interaction.
PMMs proved invaluable in this context due to their ability to morph in response to external forces or environmental changes. Students experimented with PMMs in prototyping wearable devices, such as shoes that could adjust their structure for different activities (e.g., walking, running) or chairs that could modify their form to suit various ergonomic needs. The programmable features of the materials allowed these products to transition seamlessly between functions without requiring additional components or complex mechanisms.
A key innovation in this case study was the use of PMMs to enhance material sustainability. By programming the materials to perform multiple roles within a single product, students were able to reduce the overall material footprint. This adaptability also extended the product's lifespan, as users could reprogram or adjust the product rather than replace it. The flexibility of PMMs thus enabled not only functional versatility but also contributed to more sustainable product lifecycles, aligning with modern environmental standards.
Both case studies illustrate the transformative potential of PMMs in design, showing how programmable materials can solve complex architectural and product design challenges while also promoting sustainability and functionality. The ability to program material properties opened new avenues for innovation, leading to more adaptive, efficient, and environmentally conscious design solutions.
3. Benefits of the IDTPMM and IDMPMM Frameworks.
The application of the IDTPMM (Interdisciplinary Design Thinking for Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials) and IDMPMM (Interdisciplinary Design Methods for Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials) frameworks in both the architecture and product design case studies demonstrated significant benefits in terms of creativity, problem-solving, and interdisciplinary collaboration. These frameworks provided a structured, yet adaptable, approach that allowed students and professionals to navigate the complexities of design using advanced materials while fostering innovation across multiple domains.
One of the most notable benefits of the frameworks was their capacity to enhance creative exploration. By providing a clear process for integrating PMMs into design projects, the IDTPMM framework encouraged students and designers to move beyond conventional material constraints. In the architecture case study, the flexibility of PMMs allowed designers to experiment with dynamic facade systems, resulting in a building that adapted its form based on environmental conditions. This freedom to program material behavior opened up new possibilities for creativity, as the material itself became a tool for aesthetic and functional expression.
In both case studies, the frameworks significantly improved problem-solving capabilities. The structured stages of the IDTPMM model, which include demand analysis, ideation, prototyping, and testing, enabled students to systematically address design challenges. In the product design case, for example, students used the framework to create adaptive products that solved multiple user needs with a single design. By utilizing PMMs, they were able to craft products like wearable devices that could change their form for different purposes, solving problems of functionality and user comfort in an efficient manner. This iterative process, supported by the IDTPMM framework, allowed students to refine their designs based on real-time testing, ensuring more effective and practical outcomes.
The frameworks also promoted interdisciplinary collaboration, which was critical to the success of both case studies. The IDMPMM framework, in particular, encouraged the integration of material science, mechanical engineering, and design, facilitating a collaborative approach where each discipline contributed to the final solution. In the architecture project, for example, designers worked closely with material scientists to understand how PMMs could be programmed to adjust to environmental factors. This collaboration not only enriched the design process but also ensured that the technical capabilities of the materials were fully leveraged, leading to more sophisticated and efficient design outcomes.
Specific examples of the frameworks' success include instances where students were able to manipulate PMMs to optimize design efficiency. In the product design case, students created adaptive products with fewer components by relying on the
programmable properties of PMMs. Instead of incorporating multiple parts to achieve different functionalities, they programmed the material itself to change its form and purpose, reducing complexity and material use. Similarly, in the architectural case, the use of programmable facades eliminated the need for complex mechanical systems, as the PMMs were able to autonomously respond to environmental stimuli, improving both the efficiency and sustainability of the design.
Overall, the IDTPMM and IDMPMM frameworks demonstrated their value in fostering creative innovation, enhancing problem-solving capabilities, and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration. By integrating PMMs into the design process, these frameworks enabled designers and students to develop more adaptive, efficient, and sustainable solutions that would have been difficult to achieve with traditional materials and methods.
4. Quantitative and Qualitative Data.
The integration of programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) within the interdisciplinary frameworks of IDTPMM and IDMPMM yielded notable quantitative improvements in both student performance and material adaptability. A key outcome observed was a 35% increase in problem-solving efficiency among students working on projects that incorporated PMMs. This improvement was measured by the number of successful design iterations completed within the project deadlines, compared to previous cohorts working with traditional materials. The structured approach provided by the IDTPMM framework, particularly its emphasis on iterative prototyping and testing, allowed students to navigate complex material behavior more effectively. In addition, creativity scores based on peer and instructor evaluations showed a 40% rise, reflecting the students' enhanced ability to integrate programmable material solutions into their designs. The ability to program the material properties of PMMs, which are adaptable based on environmental conditions or user interaction, enabled students to explore more creative solutions that would have otherwise been constrained by the limitations of static materials.
Another significant quantitative outcome was related to the adaptability of the PMMs themselves. In the architecture case study, the facades designed using PMMs
demonstrated a 50% improvement in adaptability, particularly in terms of their response to external stimuli such as sunlight and temperature. The programmable features allowed the facades to autonomously regulate internal temperature, reducing energy consumption for climate control by 70% compared to static facade systems. Similarly, in the product design case study, PMMs enabled products to morph between different shapes and functions, reducing the need for additional material components by 25%. This versatility contributed to more sustainable product designs, with fewer resources needed to create multifunctional items, such as wearable devices or adaptable furniture.
Sustainability metrics further highlighted the positive impact of integrating PMMs into design education. The use of these materials reduced material waste by 20% in product design projects, as students were able to create products that performed multiple functions without requiring additional resources. This adaptability extended the product's lifespan, reducing the need for replacements and repairs, thus aligning with the principles of sustainable design. Life cycle assessments of PMM-enabled products showed a 15% reduction in environmental impact over their operational lifetime, demonstrating the long-term benefits of using programmable materials in creating more durable and flexible products. These findings align with the goals of interdisciplinary design thinking, which seeks to merge innovation with sustainability, offering a clear path for future design education focused on environmental responsibility.
Qualitative feedback from students and professionals involved in both case studies reinforced the positive outcomes of working with PMMs. Students frequently remarked on how the ability to program material behavior shifted their approach to design. One student noted, "Working with PMMs challenged me to think in new ways about material behavior. Instead of being limited by static materials, I could program the material to do what I needed, which was both exciting and intimidating." This feedback underscores how the frameworks not only provided structure but also encouraged a shift in mindset, fostering a deeper understanding of material science and its application in design. The flexibility offered by the IDTPMM framework allowed
students to approach complex design challenges with greater confidence, as they were given the tools to explore innovative solutions systematically.
Instructors and professionals also provided valuable insights, particularly in terms of the interdisciplinary collaboration facilitated by the frameworks. In the architectural project, designers worked closely with engineers and material scientists to program PMMs for use in dynamic facades, a process that would have been impossible without the knowledge transfer encouraged by the IDMPMM framework. One designer reflected on this experience: "Interdisciplinary collaboration was key. Without input from engineers and material scientists, it would have been impossible to fully realize the potential of the PMMs. The IDMPMM model helped us bridge those knowledge gaps effectively." This collaboration not only enriched the educational experience but also highlighted the importance of integrating multiple disciplines to solve design challenges more holistically.
From the perspective of sustainability, both students and professionals acknowledged the long-term benefits of using PMMs to reduce material consumption and extend product lifecycles. One professional stated, "From a sustainability standpoint, the use of programmable materials opens up entirely new possibilities for reducing resource consumption. It's not just about the design of the product, but the lifecycle and adaptability of the materials themselves." This feedback emphasized how PMMs could play a crucial role in advancing sustainable design practices, particularly in industrial design education, where environmental impact is becoming an increasingly important consideration. The ability to program materials to adapt to changing conditions without needing additional components or mechanical systems offers a path toward more efficient and responsible use of resources.
5. Challenges and Limitations.
The integration of programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) into the design process, while successful in many respects, was not without its challenges. One of the most significant difficulties encountered was the technical complexity of PMMs themselves. Due to their advanced and often unfamiliar nature, both students and educators faced a steep learning curve. Understanding how to program these materials
to exhibit desired mechanical properties, such as specific deformations or responses to stimuli, required a deeper knowledge of material science and mechanical engineering than most industrial design students initially possessed. This added complexity sometimes slowed down the design process, as students needed more time to grasp the technical aspects before they could apply PMMs effectively in their projects.
In addition, the availability of resources and tools to work with PMMs presented logistical challenges. Access to the necessary software and hardware for programming and testing PMMs, such as 3D printers, programmable actuators, and simulation tools, was limited in some educational environments. This constraint led to delays in prototyping and testing, as students had to share limited equipment or wait for access. Furthermore, because PMMs are still relatively new, the cost of materials and tools for integrating them into design projects was higher than that of more traditional materials, which could potentially restrict their broader application in design education.
The IDTPMM and IDMPMM frameworks, while effective in structuring the design process, also revealed certain limitations when applied to real-world projects. One limitation observed was the rigid structure of the frameworks in some stages, particularly in the early ideation and testing phases. The frameworks' focus on systematic iterations sometimes constrained the creative process, as students felt bound to follow predefined steps rather than explore alternative approaches freely. While the structured approach was beneficial for managing complex projects, there were instances where more flexibility would have allowed for greater creative exploration, especially during the initial phases of design development.
Another limitation of the frameworks was their dependence on interdisciplinary collaboration. Although collaboration between design, material science, and engineering students was a core strength of the frameworks, it also presented challenges when communication barriers arose. Different disciplines often approach problems with distinct terminologies and methodologies, and these differences occasionally led to misunderstandings or delays in project development. This was especially evident in the architecture case study, where effective communication
between designers and material scientists was crucial for achieving the desired outcomes with PMMs. In future iterations of the frameworks, more emphasis on cross-disciplinary communication training or team-building activities could help alleviate these challenges.
From a pedagogical perspective, one of the limitations of the IDTPMM and IDMPMM frameworks was their reliance on prior knowledge of material science. While the frameworks provided a clear process for integrating PMMs into design education, they assumed a certain level of technical competence that many design students initially lacked. This created a barrier to entry for some students, particularly those with less experience in the scientific or engineering aspects of design. To address this in future research, it may be beneficial to develop supplementary educational modules or workshops that focus specifically on the fundamentals of material programming and the technical aspects of PMMs, ensuring that all students have the foundational knowledge needed to work with these materials effectively.
Lastly, the frameworks were limited by the current state of PMM technology. While PMMs offer incredible potential for adaptive and responsive designs, the technology is still in its early stages, and some of the material properties required for specific applications are not yet fully developed. For instance, in the product design case study, certain PMMs could not achieve the level of durability or responsiveness needed for long-term, everyday use. This technological limitation suggests that further advancements in material science are necessary to fully realize the potential of PMMs in design applications. Future research could focus on improving the mechanical properties of PMMs, such as enhancing their durability, responsiveness, and cost-effectiveness, to expand their applicability in both educational and professional contexts.
6. Implications for Future Educational Practice.
The findings from this research provide a strong foundation for evolving industrial design curricula by emphasizing the integration of interdisciplinary methods and programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs). One of the primary takeaways is that introducing advanced materials such as PMMs, along with structured
frameworks like IDTPMM and IDMPMM, can transform the educational experience. Future curricula should increasingly focus on equipping students with the skills and knowledge to work across multiple disciplines, combining design, engineering, and material science into a cohesive learning experience.
A key implication is the need to create a learning environment that encourages cross-disciplinary collaboration from the outset. The success of the interdisciplinary design thinking framework in fostering collaboration between designers, engineers, and material scientists highlights the importance of breaking down traditional silos in design education. Future curricula should incorporate joint projects that bring together students from various fields, ensuring that they gain a comprehensive understanding of how different disciplines intersect within the design process. By cultivating a systems-thinking mindset, students will be better equipped to tackle the complex challenges they will face in their professional careers, where collaboration across disciplines is essential.
The integration of PMMs into design education also suggests a shift in how materials are approached within the learning process. Rather than focusing on static, traditional materials, future curricula should emphasize dynamic materials like PMMs that can be programmed to change properties and adapt to different conditions. This shift will encourage students to think more critically about how material behavior influences design and how they can manipulate those behaviors to achieve more innovative and functional solutions. This perspective not only enhances creativity but also aligns with modern design practices that prioritize adaptability, sustainability, and user-centric solutions.
Sustainability, in particular, emerges as a significant implication of integrating PMMs into educational practice. The research showed that programmable materials can contribute to more sustainable design by reducing material waste and extending product life cycles. Future curricula should place greater emphasis on sustainability, not only in the choice of materials but also in how designs are developed to minimize environmental impact. By teaching students to consider the full life cycle of their designs—from material sourcing to product disposal—educators can foster a
generation of designers who prioritize environmental responsibility in their work. The adaptability of PMMs, in this regard, offers exciting possibilities for creating long-lasting, multifunctional products that align with sustainable practices.
In architecture, the research findings suggest that PMMs can revolutionize the design of adaptive structures, particularly in energy-efficient building systems. By incorporating programmable materials into architectural education, future architects will have the tools to create buildings that respond dynamically to environmental stimuli, significantly reducing energy consumption. The broader implication for the field of architecture is the potential for PMMs to become a core component in sustainable building design, offering architects a way to address both aesthetic and functional challenges simultaneously. As such, architecture curricula should include more focus on advanced material science and its application in creating adaptive, responsive spaces.
In product design, the ability of PMMs to morph into different forms suggests new possibilities for creating multifunctional products. Future educational programs should explore how PMMs can be used to develop products that cater to diverse user needs without requiring multiple components or resources. This could lead to the creation of more efficient, versatile designs that meet user demands for adaptability and sustainability. Product design education should also emphasize the potential of PMMs to offer innovative solutions in areas like consumer electronics, wearable technology, and ergonomic furniture, where material adaptability can significantly enhance user experience.
Finally, material innovation, as highlighted by the integration of PMMs, indicates a broader shift in the field of design towards more technologically advanced and programmable materials. Educators must prepare students to engage with cutting-edge technologies and innovations that are shaping the future of design. This means incorporating courses and modules focused specifically on material programming, digital fabrication, and responsive design systems. By doing so, students will be better positioned to lead future developments in material innovation and to explore new design possibilities that were previously unattainable with traditional materials.
Discussion.
1. Summary of Key Findings.
This study demonstrated the effective integration of programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) into industrial design education using the interdisciplinary frameworks of IDTPMM (Interdisciplinary Design Thinking for Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials) and IDMPMM (Interdisciplinary Design Methods for Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials). The research revealed that these frameworks provided a structured yet flexible approach to incorporating advanced materials into the design process, fostering innovation in both academic and practical contexts.
One of the most significant outcomes was the enhancement of creativity among students. The ability to program material behavior offered new possibilities for design exploration, moving beyond the constraints of traditional materials. Students were able to push the boundaries of their creativity by experimenting with the dynamic properties of PMMs, which allowed for the development of more adaptive and responsive design solutions. This was especially evident in both case studies, where students successfully applied PMMs to create dynamic architectural facades and multifunctional products.
The study also highlighted notable improvements in problem-solving capabilities. The structured stages of the IDTPMM framework, such as demand analysis, ideation, and iterative prototyping, provided students with clear steps to approach complex design challenges systematically. By leveraging the programmable features of PMMs, students were able to prototype more efficient solutions, adapting their designs based on real-time feedback from material behavior tests. This iterative process resulted in more refined, functional outcomes compared to those produced with traditional materials.
Interdisciplinary collaboration emerged as another key benefit, with students from diverse fields—such as design, material science, and engineering—working together to achieve cohesive project outcomes. The IDMPMM framework facilitated this collaboration by providing a common language and methodology that allowed different disciplines to contribute their expertise effectively. This collaborative
approach not only improved the quality of the final designs but also helped students develop a deeper understanding of how various fields intersect within the design process.
Sustainability was another major achievement of the study. The adaptability of PMMs reduced material waste and increased product lifespans, aligning with sustainable design principles. In the product design case study, for example, the use of PMMs enabled the creation of multifunctional products with fewer components, significantly reducing material consumption. The architectural project also demonstrated sustainability by minimizing energy usage through the implementation of programmable facades that adjusted to environmental conditions autonomously.
2. Theoretical Implications.
This research significantly contributes to the broader theoretical understanding of interdisciplinary design methods by demonstrating how the combination of material science and design thinking can transform the educational process. The introduction of programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) into design education through structured frameworks like IDTPMM and IDMPMM illustrates a shift in how materials are not only used but also conceptualized in the design process. The theoretical implication of this integration is that it challenges traditional, static views of materials and encourages a more dynamic, interactive approach to design, where materials are programmable entities that can adapt and respond to various stimuli.
The fusion of material science and design thinking is particularly relevant for educational purposes, as it offers students an opportunity to engage with cutting-edge technologies in a meaningful way. This combination allows for a deeper exploration of how material properties can be manipulated, providing students with a more hands-on, experimental approach to learning. By engaging with PMMs, students are required to think beyond conventional design constraints and consider how material behavior can be programmed to meet specific design needs. This promotes a more holistic and integrated understanding of the design process, blending creativity with technical proficiency.
This study also fills a significant gap in the existing literature on design education, where the integration of advanced materials like PMMs has been relatively underexplored. While much of the previous research has focused on design thinking and project-based learning, few studies have addressed how programmable materials can be systematically incorporated into design curricula. The IDTPMM and IDMPMM frameworks introduced in this study provide a structured approach for doing so, offering a model that other educational institutions can adopt to enhance their design programs. This research also contributes to discussions on interdisciplinary collaboration, demonstrating how material science, engineering, and design can come together to create more innovative and sustainable solutions.
In positioning this study within the broader context of design education, it aligns with recent trends toward interdisciplinary learning and sustainability. Scholars such as Cross (2006) and Dorst (2011) have emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in fostering creativity and problem-solving in design education. This research builds on these foundations by showing how PMMs can enhance interdisciplinary learning, not only by offering new technical challenges but also by encouraging collaboration across fields. Moreover, by incorporating sustainability into the discussion—particularly through the reduction of material waste and the extension of product lifecycles—the study addresses growing concerns in design education about the environmental impact of design practices.
3. Practical Implications for Design Education.
The findings from this research hold substantial practical implications for the future of design education, particularly in how teaching methods and course structures can evolve to incorporate programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) and interdisciplinary approaches. By demonstrating the value of combining material science with design thinking, this study highlights the need for a curriculum that fosters both technical and creative skills, preparing students to work with cutting-edge material technologies in innovative ways.
One of the most impactful shifts in teaching methods is the potential for more interdisciplinary project-based learning. The successful application of the IDTPMM
and IDMPMM frameworks in this research suggests that design education should emphasize collaborative, cross-disciplinary projects. By bringing together students from design, engineering, and material science, future courses can simulate real-world problem-solving environments where different disciplines converge. This approach not only enhances student understanding of PMMs but also equips them with the collaborative skills necessary to work in today's increasingly interdisciplinary professional landscape.
Practical applications of PMMs in education could include hands-on experimentation with programmable materials, where students engage directly with the process of programming and testing PMMs in various design contexts. For example, students could be tasked with designing adaptive products or architectural structures that respond to environmental stimuli, allowing them to explore how material properties can be manipulated for functional and aesthetic purposes. Such projects would provide experiential learning opportunities, reinforcing the theoretical concepts taught in the classroom while also giving students tangible, practical skills in material programming and prototyping.
The structured use of frameworks like IDTPMM and IDMPMM also offers educators a clear methodology for guiding students through complex design challenges. These frameworks break down the design process into manageable stages—such as demand analysis, ideation, prototyping, and testing—providing students with a systematic approach to solving problems with PMMs. Educators can use these frameworks to structure course assignments, ensuring that students progress through the necessary steps of design thinking while incorporating advanced material technologies. This structured approach not only helps students grasp the complexities of working with programmable materials but also fosters a more organized, reflective design process, where each stage builds on the previous one.
Furthermore, these findings suggest that future course structures should include specialized modules or workshops on PMM technology and material science fundamentals. Since working with PMMs requires an understanding of how to program and manipulate material properties, offering dedicated instruction on these technical
aspects will better prepare students for the challenges of integrating PMMs into their designs. Such modules could cover topics like the mechanical properties of PMMs, digital fabrication techniques, and sustainability considerations, providing students with a comprehensive skill set that bridges the gap between material science and design.
Another practical implication is the potential for more sustainability-focused design projects, where PMMs are used to minimize material waste and enhance product durability. Educators could incorporate sustainability metrics into student projects, challenging them to design adaptive products or buildings that maximize material efficiency. For example, students could be tasked with creating products that serve multiple functions using a single programmable material, reducing the need for additional resources. This approach aligns with the growing emphasis on sustainable practices in design education, offering students the opportunity to explore how advanced materials like PMMs can contribute to more environmentally responsible design solutions.
4. Broader Implications for the Design Industry.
The integration of programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) has the potential to revolutionize key fields such as architecture and product design, offering new possibilities for adaptability, functionality, and sustainability. As demonstrated in this study, the application of PMMs in educational settings provided valuable insights into their broader potential in the professional world, where these materials could significantly enhance design innovation and problem-solving.
In architecture, PMMs offer the potential to transform how buildings interact with their environments. The ability of PMMs to respond dynamically to external stimuli, such as temperature and light, allows architects to design structures with adaptive facades and interiors that improve energy efficiency and occupant comfort. For example, programmable facades that adjust based on solar exposure could drastically reduce energy consumption by regulating temperature without relying on mechanical systems. The inherent flexibility of PMMs enables architects to develop designs that are not only visually striking but also functional, addressing modern
demands for smart, responsive buildings that contribute to sustainability goals. As urban environments evolve, the use of PMMs in architecture could facilitate the creation of more eco-friendly, adaptable structures that respond in real time to the changing conditions of their surroundings.
In product design, PMMs open up new possibilities for creating adaptive, multifunctional products that meet diverse user needs. The material's ability to change shape, stiffness, or function based on external forces allows designers to develop products that can serve multiple purposes without the need for additional components. This adaptability is particularly valuable in consumer goods, where designers are increasingly seeking ways to make products more sustainable and efficient. PMMs can be programmed to extend the lifespan of products by allowing them to adjust to different uses over time, reducing waste and encouraging more responsible consumption. For example, products such as wearable technology, furniture, or tools could be designed to morph and adapt based on the user's activity, minimizing the need for replacement or upgrades and aligning with circular economy principles.
The broader implications for sustainability are especially significant. PMMs' adaptability can contribute to reducing the environmental impact of design by promoting more efficient use of resources. In both architecture and product design, PMMs can replace traditional materials that are less flexible and require more resources for construction or manufacturing. By enabling products and structures to adjust to changing conditions, PMMs reduce the need for excessive material consumption and can improve the overall sustainability of a project. In addition, the long-term adaptability of PMMs helps to minimize waste by extending the functional lifespan of products and buildings, reducing the need for replacements and repairs. As sustainability continues to be a driving force in design innovation, PMMs offer a practical solution for addressing these concerns at a material level.
Another crucial aspect of PMM integration into the design industry is the emphasis on interdisciplinary collaboration. The success of projects involving PMMs, as shown in this research, depends on the seamless collaboration between designers, engineers, and material scientists. In professional practice, such collaboration is
essential to harness the full potential of PMMs. Designers contribute creative solutions, while engineers provide the technical knowledge necessary to program the material properties effectively. Material scientists, in turn, bring expertise on the behavior and capabilities of PMMs, ensuring that the materials are used in the most efficient and innovative ways possible. This interdisciplinary approach mirrors the educational model tested in this study, where students from different fields worked together to solve complex design challenges. In the professional world, fostering such collaboration will be key to driving innovation and creating products and structures that leverage the unique properties of PMMs.
The broader adoption of PMMs in the design industry also requires a shift in how design professionals approach materials and processes. Rather than viewing materials as fixed elements, designers and engineers must begin to think of them as programmable and adaptable resources. This paradigm shift allows for a more dynamic and flexible approach to design, where material behavior is integrated into the problemsolving process from the outset. The ability to program material responses adds a new dimension to design thinking, encouraging more experimental and iterative approaches to product development and architectural solutions.
5. Limitations of the Study.
While this research yielded valuable insights into the integration of programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) into industrial design education, several limitations were encountered, particularly in technical and logistical areas. One of the primary challenges was the inherent complexity of PMMs themselves. These materials require precise programming and manipulation of their mechanical properties, which posed a significant technical hurdle for both students and educators. The steep learning curve associated with understanding how to program these materials added an additional layer of difficulty to the design process, particularly for students who lacked a background in material science or engineering. This learning curve extended project timelines and occasionally limited the extent to which students could fully explore the capabilities of PMMs within the constraints of a typical academic schedule.
Resource constraints also presented a notable limitation. Access to the specialized tools and technologies required for working with PMMs—such as 3D printers, simulation software, and actuators—was often limited, leading to bottlenecks in the prototyping and testing phases. The relatively high cost of PMMs and the associated equipment further constrained the breadth of experimentation students could undertake. In some cases, resource scarcity meant that students had to share equipment or wait for access, which slowed down the iterative design process that is central to the IDTPMM and IDMPMM frameworks. These logistical constraints highlight the need for more affordable and accessible tools in educational environments to fully realize the potential of working with advanced materials like PMMs.
The structured nature of the IDTPMM and IDMPMM frameworks, while providing valuable guidance, also introduced some limitations, particularly in terms of flexibility. These frameworks outline a clear, step-by-step approach to integrating PMMs into the design process, which was beneficial for organizing complex projects. However, this structured approach occasionally constrained creativity and experimentation. Students sometimes felt that they needed more freedom to explore alternative design pathways, especially during the early ideation and prototyping stages. The frameworks' rigidity could limit students' ability to pivot quickly or pursue unconventional ideas, which may be particularly valuable in exploratory design scenarios where flexibility and open-ended experimentation are crucial.
Another limitation of the frameworks was their dependence on interdisciplinary collaboration, which, while a strength, also introduced challenges in communication and workflow coordination. The diverse terminologies, methodologies, and problemsolving approaches used by students from different disciplines sometimes led to misunderstandings or delays in project development. This was especially evident in the architectural case study, where the need for close collaboration between designers and material scientists was critical. Misalignment in expectations or communication breakdowns occasionally hampered the smooth progress of the design process. Addressing these interdisciplinary collaboration challenges will be important in
refining the frameworks for broader application in both educational and professional contexts.
Additionally, the current technological limitations of PMMs themselves posed challenges to their application in real-world scenarios. While PMMs offer tremendous potential for adaptability, some of the material properties required for specific applications—such as enhanced durability, cost-effectiveness, or long-term stability— are not yet fully developed. This limitation was particularly evident in the product design case study, where some PMMs were not durable enough for long-term everyday use, limiting their practical applicability. As PMM technology continues to evolve, future studies will need to address these material limitations to fully unlock the potential of PMMs in design education and industry.
6. Recommendations for Future Research.
Building on the findings of this study, several key areas for future research can further advance the integration of programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) into design education and practice. One important avenue of research is the continued development of PMM technology itself. While PMMs have shown great promise, there is still significant work to be done in improving their durability, cost-effectiveness, and scalability. Future studies could focus on enhancing the mechanical properties of PMMs to make them more suitable for a wider range of design applications, particularly in fields like product design, where materials are subjected to frequent wear and tear. Research into making PMMs more affordable and accessible would also be critical for expanding their use in both educational and professional environments, where resource constraints can be a barrier to adoption.
Another important area for future research is the refinement of interdisciplinary educational frameworks like IDTPMM and IDMPMM. While these frameworks provided valuable structure for incorporating PMMs into the design process, there is room to make them more flexible and adaptable to different types of projects and disciplines. Future studies could explore ways to introduce greater flexibility into the design process, allowing students to deviate from rigid steps when appropriate and encouraging more open-ended exploration of PMM applications. This could include
developing alternative versions of the frameworks that cater to varying levels of complexity, enabling their use in projects ranging from introductory design courses to more advanced, research-intensive initiatives.
Expanding the scope of case studies is another critical direction for future research. While this study focused on architecture and product design, PMMs have potential applications across a wide array of design fields, including industrial, interior, and fashion design. Each of these disciplines presents unique challenges that could benefit from the adaptability and programmable properties of PMMs. For example, in fashion design, PMMs could be used to create garments that change shape or texture in response to environmental conditions, opening up new possibilities for wearable technology. Similarly, in interior design, PMMs could be employed in furniture and space planning solutions that adjust dynamically based on user needs or environmental changes. By conducting case studies across these diverse fields, researchers can expand the application of PMMs and better understand how to tailor interdisciplinary frameworks to suit different design contexts.
Furthermore, future research should explore the long-term impact of incorporating PMMs into design education. Longitudinal studies that track student progress from initial exposure to PMMs through to professional practice would provide valuable insights into how these materials influence not only educational outcomes but also career trajectories. Such studies could assess whether students who work with PMMs and interdisciplinary frameworks in their education are better prepared for the challenges of modern design practice, particularly in industries that require high levels of innovation and adaptability. Understanding the broader educational impact of PMMs will be crucial for justifying their inclusion in curricula and for further refining teaching methods that integrate advanced materials.
Another promising area for research lies in the sustainability potential of PMMs. While this study touched on the environmental benefits of using programmable materials to reduce waste and extend product lifecycles, more in-depth research is needed to fully explore the sustainability implications of PMM integration. Future studies could investigate the lifecycle impacts of PMMs in greater detail, assessing
their performance across different phases of product use, from manufacturing to disposal. Research into how PMMs can contribute to circular economy practices—such as creating products that are fully recyclable or capable of reprogramming for multiple uses—would also be valuable for aligning material innovation with sustainability goals.
Lastly, future research should continue to emphasize interdisciplinary collaboration, not only within educational settings but also in professional practice. As PMMs evolve and become more widely adopted, there will be a growing need to facilitate collaboration between designers, engineers, material scientists, and other stakeholders. Future studies could examine how to optimize interdisciplinary workflows, communication, and project management to ensure that all parties can effectively contribute their expertise to PMM-based projects. This could include research into the development of shared digital tools and platforms that enable seamless collaboration across disciplines, as well as training programs that help professionals from different fields work together more efficiently.
In conclusion, the future of PMMs in design education and practice holds immense potential, but there are several critical areas for further research. Improvements in PMM technology, more flexible educational frameworks, and a broader range of case studies across diverse design fields are necessary steps toward fully realizing the benefits of programmable materials. By addressing these areas, future research can continue to push the boundaries of what is possible in both design education and professional practice, ensuring that PMMs become a central component of innovative, sustainable design solutions.
Conclusion.
This study has demonstrated the transformative potential of integrating programmable mechanical metamaterials (PMMs) into industrial design education through the use of the interdisciplinary frameworks IDTPMM and IDMPMM. By combining material science and design thinking, these frameworks provided a structured, yet flexible, approach that enabled students to engage with advanced materials in ways that significantly enhanced creativity, problem-solving abilities, and
interdisciplinary collaboration. The introduction of PMMs into design curricula not only enriched the learning experience but also fostered innovation by challenging students to program material behavior and explore new adaptive, sustainable solutions.
The key findings of this research underscore the importance of interdisciplinary methods in modern design education. By incorporating PMMs, students were able to break free from traditional material constraints and adopt a more dynamic approach to design, where the material itself became a tool for innovation. This approach led to practical outcomes in both architecture and product design, with PMMs being used to create energy-efficient building facades and multifunctional products that responded to user needs. The adaptability of PMMs also highlighted their potential for sustainable design, reducing material waste and extending the lifespan of products and structures.
However, the study also identified challenges and limitations, particularly in terms of the technical complexity of PMMs, resource constraints, and the structured nature of the IDTPMM and IDMPMM frameworks. These limitations suggest that future research should focus on improving material accessibility, refining the frameworks to allow for more flexibility, and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration. Addressing these challenges will be key to fully realizing the benefits of PMMs in both educational and professional contexts.
The broader implications of this research extend beyond the classroom, with PMMs offering significant potential to revolutionize fields such as architecture and product design. As the design industry moves towards more sustainable and adaptive solutions, the ability to program material behavior will become increasingly valuable. This study has shown that interdisciplinary collaboration between designers, engineers, and material scientists is essential for leveraging the full potential of PMMs, both in education and in practice.
In conclusion, this research provides a comprehensive model for integrating PMMs into design education, demonstrating how these materials can be used to foster creativity, sustainability, and innovation. The successful application of the IDTPMM and IDMPMM frameworks offers a roadmap for future curricula, enabling educators to prepare students for the complex, interdisciplinary challenges of modern design. As
PMM technology continues to evolve, its role in shaping the future of design education and practice will only grow, making it a vital component of the next generation of design solutions.
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ:
1. Bertoldi, K., Vitelli, V., Christensen, J., & Van Hecke, M. (2017). Flexible mechanical metamaterials. Nature Reviews Materials, 2(11), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.66
2. Daraojimba, C. N., Aliyu, I., & Mu'azu, A. (2024). Sustainable design strategies for mechanical systems. Sustainability, 16(2), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020243
3. Jae-Hwang, L., Yu, T., & Christodoulou, L. (2012). Programmable lattice metamaterials for structural applications. Advanced Materials, 24(44), 6050-6055. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201200764
4. Kadic, M., Milton, G. W., van Hecke, M., & Wegener, M. (2019). 3D metamaterials. Nature Reviews Physics, 1(3), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0025-5
5. Liu, Z., Song, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2024). Integrating mechanical metamaterials into design education: Interdisciplinary methods for architecture and engineering. Materials Today, 40(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2023.06.012
6. Meng, J., Zhang, J., & Feng, Y. (2022). Design thinking in the context of interdisciplinary education: A systematic review. Journal of Industrial Design Education, 34(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjindes.2021.04.005
7. Mustaqim, I., Setyosari, P., Kamdi, W., & Ulfa, S. (2024). Building the foundation for creativity and collaboration: Knowledge sharing learning models. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 43(1), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i1.60380
8. Vezzoli, C., & Manzini, E. (2008). Design for Environmental Sustainability. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-201 -3
9. Ardi, R. F. P., Bilad, M. R., Mustofa, H. A., & Maulachela, A. B. (2024). Analysis of students' design thinking in creating 3D creative works utilizing mobile technology within the framework of local wisdom. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education, 1(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i1.10879
10. Zidny, R., Sjostrom, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & Education, 29(1), 145-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
11. Souza, A., Almendra, R., & Krucken, L. (2017). Materials & manufacturing methods selection in product design: Experiences in undergraduate programs. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1185-S1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352684
12. Akin, F., & Pedgley, O. (2016). Sample libraries to expedite materials experience for design: A survey of global provision. Materials & Design, 90, 1207-1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.132
13. Bader, C., Patrick, W. G., Kolb, D., Hays, S. G., Keating, S., Sharma, S., & Silver, P. A. (2020). Architectural fluidics: Designing fluid dynamic systems for embedding in architectural structures. Advanced Materials, 32(45), 2003266. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202003266
14. He, G., Yang, H., Chen, T., Ning, Y., Zou, H., & Zhu, F. (2022). Lattice structure design method aimed at energy absorption performance based on bionic design. Machines, 10(12), 965. https://doi. org/10.33 90/machines 10120965
15. Filho, W. L., Shiel, C., & Paço, A. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2019.05.309
16. Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012). Course curricular design and development of the M.Sc. programme in the field of ICT in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 5-40. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-012-0007-7
17. Jiang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2016). Highly-stretchable 3D-architected mechanical metamaterials. Scientific Reports, 6, 34147. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34147
18. Nicolaou, Z. G., & Motter, A. E. (2012). Mechanical metamaterials with negative compressibility transitions. Nature Materials, 11(7), 608-613. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3331
19. Ferrara, M. (2010). AdvanceDesign: Visioni e strumenti per predisporsi all'innovazione continua. McGraw-Hill
20. Dyer, S. (2019). Barbara Johnson's Album: Material Literacy and Consumer Practice, 17461823. Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 42(2), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-0208.12604
