CC BY
10Journal of Siberian Federal University. Engineering & Technologies, 2016, 9(8), 1314-1325
УДК 536.8
About Some Properties and Features of Differential
and Integrated Representations
in the Theory of Thermodynamic Functions
Toksan A. Zhakatayev*a, Kamalkhan E. Sakipova, Klara Sh. Kakimovab and Maralgul B. Aytmagambetovaa
aL.N. Gumilev Eurasian National University 13 K. Munitpasova Str., Astana, 010008, Kazakhstan bKaraganda State Technical University 56 Mira Boulevard Str., Karaganda, 100027, Kazakhstan
Received 27.06.2016, received in revised form 19.09.2016, accepted 14.11.2016
In article the comparative analysis of differential and integrated consideration of thermodynamic process is carried out. It is shown that use of the rule of replacement of variables of integration leads to correct output of main thermodynamic functions (an enthalpy, Helmholtz's function and Gibbs's function). It occurs through integrated consideration of thermodynamic process when parameters change in final (limited) intervals. It is established that Integrated consideration of the law of energy conservation in general view for the moving final volume of liquid or gas leads to «expanded» option of formula for the first law of thermodynamics. At the same time the equations recorded in differential form taking into account different types of technical work. Communications between the work of pushing through of some volume of gas and work connected with pressure at expansion of gas volume are shown.
Keywords: thermodynamic function, pushing through work, thermodynamic potentials, enthalpy, law of energy conservation, moving volume of gas, mobile borders, final volume, final interval of change.
Citation: Zhakatayev T.A., Sakipov K.E., Kakimova K.Sh., Aytmagambetova M.B. About some properties and features of differential and integrated representations in the theory of thermodynamic functions, J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Eng. technol., 2016, 9(8), 1314-1325. DOI: 10.17516/1999-494X-2016-9-8-1314-1325.
© Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved Corresponding author E-mail address: [email protected]
О некоторых свойствах и особенностях дифференциальных и интегральных представлений в теории термодинамических функций
Т.А. Жакатаева, К.Е. Сакипова, К.Ш. Какимоваб, М.Б. Айтмагамбетоваа
аЕвразийский национальный университет им. Л.Н. Гумилева Казахстан, 010008, Астана, ул. К. Мунайтпасова, 13 бКарагандинский государственный технический университет Казахстан, 100027, Караганда, ул. Бульвар Мира, 56
В статье проведен сравнительный анализ дифференциального и интегрального рассмотрения термодинамического процесса. Показано, что использование правила замены переменных интегрирования приводит к корректному выводу основных термодинамических функций (энтальпия, функция Гельмгольца и функция Гиббса). Это происходит при интегральном рассмотрении термодинамического процесса, когда параметры изменяются в конечных (ограниченных) интервалах. Установлено, что интегральное рассмотрение закона сохранения энергии в общем виде для движущегося конечного объема жидкости или газа приводит к "расширенному" варианту формулы для первого закона термодинамики. При этом уравнения записываются в дифференциальной форме с учетом различных видов технической работы. Показаны связи между работой проталкивания некоторого объема газа и работой, связанной с давлением при расширении объема газа.
Ключевые слова: термодинамическая функция, работа проталкивания, термодинамические потенциалы, энтальпия, закон сохранения энергии, движущийся объем газа, подвижные границы, конечный объем, конечный интервал изменения.
1. Introduction
Thermodynamic functions are widely applied in the theory of metallurgical processes and in power system - [1 - 7].
At a conclusion of the equations for the isochoric - isothermal potential of F (Helmholtz's energy) and the isobaric - isothermal potential of G (Gibbs's energy) at the same time it is possible to allocate and distinguish two approaches. It is possible to call the first approach differential - [4 -7], and the second approach - integrated - [8-12]. However in literature the distinctive and similar parties of these two aren't considered and, differing approaches at a conclusion of the main equations for thermodynamic processes aren't analyzed. In the present article we will carry out the analysis, theoretical justification and we will specify in what actually similarity and distinction of these two approaches at a conclusion of basic formulas for thermodynamic functions.
2. Decision of the task
At the beginning we will consider a conclusion of the main equations on the basis of differential ratios, following results of works [3-7].
We will write down the first law of thermodynamics in a look
dU = TdS - pdV . (1)
To both parts (1) we will add Vdp [4-7]
dU + Vdp = TdS - pdV + Vdp . (2)
We will rewrite (2) in the form of [4-7]
dU + pdV + Vdp = d(U + PV) = TdS + Vdp. (3)
From (3) follows that an enthalpy
H = U + pV (4)
is function of a condition of system and function of two independent variables [4-7]
dH = TdS + Vdp . (5)
We subtract SdT from both members of equation (1) and we will write down it in the form of [4-7]:
-SdT + dU- TdS = —pdV - SdT . (6)
From (6) follows
d(U - TS) = —pdV - SdT. (7)
From (7) it is visible that size
F=U-TS (8)
is function of a condition of system (U, S) and full differential of some function which depends on two independent V and T variables. This function F is called isochoric-isothermal potential [4-7]
dF = —pdV - SdT. (9)
Further, on the basis of the analysis of the equation for full differential
dF = (idV + (aJL) dT \avJT \dTjy
Conclusion of the known formulas is made for P, S, CV - [4-7].
We will consider an equation conclusion for isobaric and isothermal potential now. To both members of equation (1) we will add the size (Vdp - SdT) and we will write down (1) in the form of [4-7]
dU + pdV - TdS + VdP - SdT = Vdp - SdT . (10)
From (10) after transformations we will receive
d(U-TS + PV) = Vdp-SdT. (11)
Follows from formulas (4) and (11) that
d(H - TS) = dG = VdP - SdT.
(12)
Therefore
G = H-TS
(13)
is function of a condition of system and full differential of function from two independent variables
From the above it is visible that for an enthalpy of H, izokhorno-isothermal F and isobaric and isothermal G potential, a conclusion on the basis of differential ratios is represented obvious and logically consecutive. Visually are established on what independent variables they depend, you watch the equations (5), (9), (12). Formulas for final (integrated) expressions (4), (8), (13) follow from the equations for full differentials.
We will consider some results of a conclusion of the same equations on the basis of integrated consideration, so-called integrated approach now, using results of works [8-12].
At the same time at the beginning some G, F, H functions which are presented by the integrated equations (4), (8), (13) - [8-12] are just entered into consideration. Then the full differentials of these functions expressed by formulas (2), (3), (5) - (7) are calculated, (10) - (12).
Further, using the received systems of the equations in a differential form, we come to equality (1).
It is possible to call this way of the proof "reverse motion". Going from some integrated formulas (13), (8), (4), we come to the equation (1) [8-12]. Arrival to a formula (1) serves as the proof of correctness of integrated formulas. At the seeming evidence and simplicity, this way of the proof of a correctness of formulas (4), (8), (13) possesses that shortcoming what doesn't answer a question and from where have undertaken, initially from where integrated formulas (4), (8) and (13) have appeared?
There is the following question. What will be (what will change) if we consider the forward stroke of the proof given above on the basis of integration of the differential equations (1), (5), (9), (12) for final process between points 1 and 2, you watch figures 1 and 2?
In figure 1 thermodynamic process in P-V coordinates from works is shown [8-12]. The proof is carried out on the basis of consideration of thermodynamic work in two of her versions: PdV and VdP for process between two points 1-2 [8-12]. Thus, on the basis of the analysis of the schedule of thermodynamic process the following formula [8-12] is proved
Formula (14) we call integrated because final expression for H (formula 4) turns out at integration
p, T [4-7].
Useful formulas for V,S follow from the following formula for full differential - [3-7, 10]
Qi,2 = H2-H1- W1;2 ,
(14)
r2
where W12 = J1 VdP - work against pressure forces.
Fig. 1. Scheme of Thermodynamic Process in P-V coordinates [8-12].
Fig. 2. The scheme of thermodynamic process in T-S coordinates
From (14) the proof of an integrated formula (4) also follows.
Now, following the logic of calculations used in works [8-12], we will carry out a conclusion of the main integrated equations (4), (8), (13). Our difference is expressed only that we in addition use the schedule of any thermodynamic process in T-S coordinates. Change of thermodynamic functions in the intervals final (limited), fixed, between points 1-2 is considered.
In figure 2 the schedule of any thermodynamic process in T - S coordinates is shown. From consideration of this drawing it is visible that
■$1,2,3,4 + ^6,1,4,0 _ ^0,5,2,3 = ^6,1,2,5 > (15)
where S^^ - the area of a figure limited to points of i,j, k, I. On the basis of (15) we will receive that
f12 TdS + T1S1 - T2S2 = - f12 SdT. (16)
Further on the basis of (14) and (15) we will receive
j;2 TdS = T2S2 - T1S1 - J12 SdT = H2-H1- f12 VdP. (17)
Integrated formulas (8) and (13) directly follow from a formula (17).
At the same time used the graphic analysis of thermodynamic process in T-S and P-V coordinates in common.
Thus we have proved that the basic thermodynamic formulas for Gibbs's function -G, Helmholtz - F and enthalpies - H it is possible to bring out of integrated consideration of thermodynamic process correctly. When all changes of the main sizes happen in final (limited, fixed) limits, points 1-2 in figure 2. From the integrated equation (17) it is also visible that variables for the G-(13) function are P and T. Therefore, integrated consideration leads without any complications to the same obvious results, as differential consideration. At the same time, the initial, starting moment is the physical law of conservation and transformation of energy expressed in thermodynamic sizes - (1).
By consideration of mechanical work which is spent for change of volume of gas the formula [813] is used
f2 Fds = f2 PdV ji ji
where F-force, N, the s-passable way, m, P-pressure, Pa, V-the volume, m3.
From the point of view of mechanics force is function from the passable way of F=F (s). From
r 2
this it follows that the following function J1 F(s)ds is integrated. It is standard. However, in
mechanics it isn't accepted to integrate as work expression J1 s(F)dF. Though, from the point of
view of mathematics the F(s) function can always have an inverse function of s(F). Therefore, by consideration of some physical processes function and an independent variable (argument) aren't rearranged by places at integration. The thermodynamics shows us that such shift by places when the argument turns into function, and function plays an argument role (an independent variable)
it makes a certain physical sense. As an important example we will give definition of entropy of
AS > J"2 (see formula (16)) where the absolute temperature of T in this case plays a role of the
integrated T=T (Q) function, the expression standing under integral, and an independent variable is the amount of heat of Q.
In this regard we had had some new, additional views on interpretation of two types of thermodynamic work of PdV, VdP and their communication with other members in the general law of energy conservation. In work [11] (paragraph 2-1) the following equations which express the first law of thermodynamics and the law of energy conservation in moving volume are presented, you look also [5-7]:
AQ = AU + P2V2 - P1V1 + + Mg(h2 - h1) + Ltech , (18)
AQ=AU + J PdV, (19)
where AQ - warmth, J, M - the mass of gas, kg, g - the acceleration of gravity, m /s2, h-height showing change of potential energy, m, w1, w2 - stream speeds in two various sections, m/s, Ltech - technical work, J.
On the basis of comparison of two various records (types) of the law of energy conservation (the law of thermodynamics) in [5-9, 11, 12] for specific work of expansion of gas the following equation is received
1 2
1 = jpdv = p2v2 - p1v1 + + g(h2 - h-d + ltech. (20)
In the equation (20) all members are carried to unit of mass, ltech=[J/kg], v=[m3/kg], l = [J/kg]. However, at a conclusion of the equation (20) in certain cases can make a mechanical mistake. In our opinion, the first law of thermodynamics in her expanded record, or in other words, the law of energy conservation in the moving volume of a gas stream taking into account different types of transformation and change of energy, it is necessary to write down in the form of (18) or in the following look
w2
dq = du + d(pv) + d — + gdh + dltech. (21)
At the same time it is necessary to consider that expansion work J pdv already contains it (is included) in gas l pushing through work lp,v , dq = [J/kg].
Presence of the following two members
= J pdv, (22)
(23)
= (P2^2 - Pl^l)
in the right part of these equations means that they also, as well as other functions
x3 = Au ,
1 2 _ w^-wl
Xa —
(24)
= g(h2- hi),
x6 = hech ^
are equivalent and absolutely independent variables for function
Aq=f(x i,x2,x3,---,xn) . (25)
At the same time we assume that there are unambiguous (continuous) inverse functions
Xi = q>i(Aq,Xj).
At the same time, from the point of view of physics of process of Xj ^ xt. Therefore, formulas (18), (21) are true. Our these representations are confirmed also by results of work [14]. Therefore, the equations (18), (21) are only expanded option of a formula (1) where possible types of change of energy of a stream of the gas moving in a potential gravitational field and other possible types of technical work are in addition considered. In other words, without formulas (18) and (21), the size x\ and x2 - formulas (20), (22) - (24) can't be connected directly among themselves in any way.
Existence of some physical law, (18), (19), (21) doesn't mean similar at all that between his independent variables surely there has to be some direct functional link of xt = ^¿(xy). In which there is no binding member Aq, watch a formula (20).
It should be noted that work of pushing through of lp?v = (Pi^i ~P2V2) doesn't appear
«automatically» when replacing the variable xj on = x2 — f^2 vdp, you watch formulas (19) - (23) as it can seem in certain cases.
The matter is that work of pushing through of lp,v is absolutely independent variable in the general expression (18). Work of pressure at pushing through of liquid volume can be performed by external foreign forces.
Formulas (18), (21) can also be brought out of the general law of energy conservation in the moving final volume of liquid or gas [15 - a formula (11)], [16]. For this case we will formulate the law of energy conservation in the form of the following integrated ratio, fair for the mobile final volume of the continuous environment
dz
iP
V
( -2
w
e h---h e
p°t,g
d9 = Jpf m • wd9 + U p n • wda-V F
(26)
|qf • rda + | qmPde + |qRPd0 + Jl"^pd9,
V
V
V
Where ei - internal energy per unit mass, J/kg, epot g - the potential energy of unit of mass of liquid connected with leveling height, J/kg, w - the speed of the movement of liquid or gas, m/s, qf - a thermal flow of Fourier, W/m2, qR - a thermal stream from radiation, W/kg, qm - thermal stream from mass sources of heat, W/kg, pn - a vector of density of superficial force, Pa, fm - the mass density of volume force, N/kg, ^h - all types of technical work carried to unit of mass and to a unit of time, W/kg.
Carrying out some transformations and calculations similar to that which are carried out in work [15], we have proved that from an integrated formula (26) the equations for final thermodynamic process (18), (21) turn out. The formula (26) differs from a formula (11) from work to [15] those that at the right part there is an additional member for technical work lj^h, J/kg.
Using a formula for differentiation of the integral taken on mobile volume we will receive
d
2
d f
dx V
i -2 w
ei h---h e
pot,g
de= j
V
( (
w
w
ei J---h e
pot,g
de +
div
( ( -2 w
w -p
ei h---h e
pot,g
V v
de .
We will consider that
(27)
and
( (
div
w -p
w
ei J---h e
pot,g
V v
= w • div
( ( -2 w
ei h---h e
Pot,g
V v
/V
^ ( -2 w
+p
yy V
w
ei + _2 + eP0t,g
div (w j
d_
dz
( f -2 w
ei h---h e
Pot,g
_d_ dx
f -2 w
e+_2+epot,g
V V
+ w • div
( f -2 w
ei h---h e
pot,g
(28)
(29)
full derivative of a total energy of some final volume of the moving environment. Substituting (27) - (29) in (26), we will receive the equation
V
dx
( -2 w
ei 2 epot,g
de= Jpfm • wde + J div(pn • w)d8 + V V
+ J divqfde + J qmde + J qRd9 + J ¡J^dG - j V V V V V
( -2 ^ w
ei + — i 2
v y
div ^w j
(30)
de,
where
^ pxx pyx pzx ^
p =
Pxy pyy pzy v pxz pyz pzz
tensor of superficial pressure forces, n - a single normal to a surface of the considered volume.
As integration volume same for all members, all integrals it is possible to unite in one general integral. Rejecting integral, leaving only under integrated expression, from (30) it is possible to receive
( ~2 )] _ _ ^ _
epot,g = Pf m • w + div (Pn • w) +
(31)
( -2 >
d_ dt
w 2
divqf+qm + qR- p
w
ei h---v e
Pot,g
div (w) .
Thus, emergence of two members of the equations follows from property of mobility (expansion or compression) borders of the considered volume: 1-convective part for a full derivative
w • div
( i P V v
w
ei+ ~2+epot,g
(32)
2 - a possibility of change of a total energy of individual volume of liquid as a result of volume deformation (compression or expansion) with an invariable weight in total amount
(
\
w
ei++epot,g
div (w ).
(33)
We will accept that volume forces and thermal streams qi are absent, liquid div(w )=0 aren't squeezed. Also liquid doesn't proceed outside and doesn't flow in inside into this considered volume. Under these conditions it is possible to integrate (30), presenting her in the form
2 1 d
1
w
- + e
pot,g
2
j[div (Pn • w )]dt.
(34)
The analysis shows that the equation (34) can be integrated, accepting an assumption that liquid ideal which has no tangent tension, exists only the hydrostatic pressure ofpj = -p5y. In case of the one-dimensional movement from (34) have received the following equation
A(pei ) + A
< w2 ^
p -2
V y
+ A(pepot,g ) = AP +1 P(wx) 1
dw,
wx
(35)
where at each member the sign A means change in a final interval, for example Ap = p2-p1. The fact that (35) expresses the law of energy conservation is confirmed by the following check according
N ■ m J
to the theory of dimension [p] = —-= —- also expresses the work made in unit of volume at
ml ■ m mi
change of pressure upon final size. The right part of a formula (35) shows that generally the work performed by pressure forces consists of two parts: 1 work connected with change of pressure - VdP,
2 - the work connected with change of volume - PdV. Such "variety", increase in a type of work for superficial pressure is connected with transition from superficial integral to volume for expression in formulas (26), (30), (34) according to Ostrogradsky-Gauss's theorem. In other words, integrated consideration contains (includes) all possible types of works which are connected with changes of volume and pressure of gas. In this sense integrated consideration is "slightly richer", than differential consideration of thermodynamic process.
Thus, differential ratios and vice versa follow from the integrated description, these two methods of the description are absolutely equivalent with each other on the end result for thermodynamic sizes.
In work [15] it is proved that formulas (members) (32) and (33) turn out not only as a result of expansion of volume border. Leads to the same formulas also presence of a convective stream of weight and energy through the closed fixed surface which limits the set elementary volume of the ji = J p whdo, where h - an enthalpy. We will consider a well-known formula for full, substantiate derivative some physical quantity 9 - [17]
+ + + (36)
Results [15] and formula (32) show that the convective component in (36) can result: 1 changes of volume, expansion or compression of border of volume (by integrated consideration), 2 flowing or an effluence of a stream of mass of substance which it is connected are transferred with itself by a stream of this scalar ji = j p wyda.. By differential consideration when volume is considered elementary and his external borders aren't mobile.
Conclusions
1. Use of the rule of replacement of variables of integration leads to correct conclusion of the main thermodynamic functions (an enthalpy, Helmholtz's function and Gibbs's function) by integrated consideration of thermodynamic process in final intervals of change of parameters.
2. Integrated consideration of the law of energy conservation in a general view for moving final volume of liquid or gas leads to «expanded» option of formula for the first law of thermodynamics written down in differential form taking into account different types of technical and thermodynamic work.
References
[1] Zhukhovitsky A. A., Schwarzman L. A. Physical chemistry. M.: Metallurgy, 1976. 543 p. (in Russian)
[2] Krasnov K. S. (editor). Physical chemistry. M.: The higher school, 1982. 687 p. (in Russian)
[3] Daniels F., Alberti R. Physical chemistry. M.: The higher school, 1967. 780 p. (in Russian)
[4] Lushpa A. I. Fundamentals of chemical thermodynamics and kinetics of chemical reactions. M.: Mechanical engineering, 1981. 240 p. (in Russian)
[5] Nashchokin V. V. Technical thermodynamics and heat transfer. M.: The higher school, 1973. 496 p. (in Russian)
[6] Larikov N. N. Heating engineer. M.: Stroyizdat, 1985. 492 p. (in Russian)
- 1324 -
[7] Yudayev B. N. Technical thermodynamics. Heat transfer. M.: The higher school, 1988. 479 p. (in Russian)
[8] Kuzovlev V. A. Technical thermodynamics and bases of a heat transfer. M.: The higher school, 1975. 303 p. (in Russian)
[9] Kosterev F. M., Kushnyrev V. I. Theoretical bases heating engineers. M.: Energy, 1978. 360 p. (in Russian)
[10] Kireev V. A. Course of physical chemistry. M.: Chemistry, 1975. 775 p. (in Russian)
[11] Sushkin I. N. (editor). Heating engineer. M.: Metallurgy, 1973. 479 p. (in Russian)
[12] Chernov A. V., Bessrebrennikov N. N., Siletsky V. S. Bases heating engineers and hydraulics. M.: Energy, 1975. 415 p. (in Russian)
[13] Telesnin R. V. Molecular physics. M.: The higher school, 1973. 360 p. (in Russian)
[14] Abramovich G. N. Applied gas dynamics. M.: Science, 1976. 670 p. (in Russian)
[15] Zhakatayev T. A., Kakimova K. Sh. The comment to a conclusion of the energy conservation law for the final mobile and small individual volume of the continuous environment. Bulletin KarSU. Physics series. Karaganda: KarSU of E. A. Buketov, 2012, (4), 25-33. (in Russian)
[16] Loytsyansky L. G. Mechanics of liquid and gas. M.: Bustard, 2003. 840 p. (in Russian)
[17] Sedov L. I. Mechanics of the continuous environment. M.: Science, 1973. 1. 492 p. (in Russian)
