CC BY
52
Scientific journal PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION
Has been issued since 2013.
Науковий журнал Ф1ЗИКО-МАТЕМАТИЧНА ОСВ1ТА
Видаеться з 2013.
http://fmo-journal.fizmatsspu.sumy.ua/
Воскоглой М. Про графiчне представлення пох/'дних // Ф'!зико-математична осв'та : науковий журнал. - 2017. -Випуск 2(12). - С. 9-16.
Voskoglou М. A Note On The Graphical Representation Of The Derivatives // Physical and Mathematical Education : scientific journal. - 2017. - Issue 2(12). - Р.9-16.
Michael Gr. Voskoglou
Graduate Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece, Patras, Greece
[email protected]; [email protected]
A NOTE ON THE GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE DERIVATIVES
Abstract. In the article at hands an alternative definition of the concept of the derivative is presented, which makes no use of limits. This definition is based on an old idea of Descartes for calculating the slope of the tangent at a point of a curve and holds for all the algebraic functions. Caratheodory extended this definition to a general definition of the derivative in terms of the concept of continuity. However, although this definition has been used successfully by many German mathematicians, it is not widely known in the international literature, nor it is used in the school book texts. After presenting Caratheodory's definition, the article closes by describing methods for calculating the derivative at a point of a function y = f(x) with the help of a suitably chosen table of values of f(x), and for designing of the graph of the derivative function f'(x) given the graph, but not the formula, of f(x). These methods are based on the graphical representation of the derivative, which should be reclaimed better in general for teaching purposes.
Key words: teaching/learning the derivatives, tangent at a point of the graph of a function, algebraic and transcendental functions, Caratheodory's definition of the derivative, graphs of the derivative functions, Maple software.
Problem formulation. Mathematical education researchers report that, although student routine performance on differentiation items is usually adequate, most of them have little intuitive or conceptual understanding of the derivative concept [1-7], etc. Many calculus students are, for example, proficient at differentiating a function and finding its critical values. However, can students conceptualize these actions and work with them if they are not presented in equation form? For example, Ferrini-Mundy & Graham [3] described student difficulties in trying to sketch the derivative of a given function presented only graphically. Many of them tried first to find an algebraic function's representation.
It seems that many students perform poorly due to their weakness to deal successfully with information about abstract concepts (e.g. functions, limits etc.) given in symbolic form, but also because they luck of the necessary cognitive schemas that could allow them to organize their knowledge on those matters [8]. Consequently, the use by the instructor of various representations of the concept of the derivative is recommended as well as the student orientation to analogous activities [9-12], etc. This is reinforced by Tall [13] who has made a strong argument for direct links between visualization and symbolization when teaching the concept of the derivative. In particular, many researchers focus their attention on the graphical representation of the derivative [3, 14, 15], etc.
On the other hand, a number of authors have used principles of the APOS (action-process-object-schema) theory and of the connected to it ACE (actions on computers, classroom discussion, homework exercises) teaching cycle for the research on the improvement of the understanding of the concept of the derivative [5. 6, 16, 17], etc. The APOS theory, which is based on Piaget's principles for learning [18], was developed in the USA during the 1990s by Ed Dubinsky and his collaborators and has been used for improving the teaching and understanding of almost all mathematical topics [16, 19-22], etc.
Giraldo, Carvalho & Tall [23] distinguish between the description of a concept, which specifies the main properties of that concept and the formal concept's definition. In particular, they note that a commonly used
ISSN 2413-158X (online) ISSN 2413-1571 (print)
description of the derivative of a function y = (x) at a point a of its domain is that it gives the slope of the tangent line to the function's graph at the point (a, f(a)). It is also recalled that another common description of the derivative is that it expresses the rate of change of the function f(x) with respect to x, while its physical meaning is connected to the speed and to the acceleration at a moment of time of a moving object under the action of a steady force. On the contrary, the formal definition of the derivative f'(a) of y = f(x) at a is given by
f'(a) = lim (!)
x — a
However, the concept of the limit is difficult to be understood by students. For example, in calculating the limit appearing in definition (!), while we initially accept that x tends to a with valuesx * a, we finally set x = a. Although this manipulation can be easily justified by the continuity of y = f(x) at a, it is frequently confusing the novices. It is characteristic that !50 whole years were required from the time that Newton (1642-1727) and Leibniz (!646-!7!6) initiated the Differential Calculus until the complete understanding of the concept of the limit and this says everything!
Therefore, it is natural for one to put the question of whether or not is it possible to initially define the concept of the derivative without using the limits. In fact, as we shall see next, this is possible for the wide class of algebraic functions. Nevertheless, although this is based to an old idea of Rene Descartes (1596-1650), the corresponding definition of the derivative is not so much in use in our days, nor it is mentioned in the school texts.
The purpose of the present article is to describe this method that results to an algebraic definition of the derivative. Nevertheless, one cannot use this definition in case of the transcendental functions (trigonometric, exponential, logarithmic and many others), where the use of the traditional definition (1) becomes necessary. After all, this is actually the main difference between Algebra, where only finite processes are in use, and Mathematical Analysis, where the use of infinite processes, including the limits, becomes necessary.
The rest of this article is organized as follows: In the second Section the algebraic method of Descartes is presented for calculating the slope of the tangent at a point of the graph of an algebraic function and the resulting algebraic definition of the derivative is given. As an example, the product and the chain rule for the derivatives are proved with the help of this definition. In third Section a general definition for the derivative in terms of the concept of continuity, due to Caratheodory, is given, which is based on the previous definition for the algebraic functions. Finally, in fourth Section approximate methods of calculating the derivative at a point of a function and of designing the graph of f '(x) when the graph, but not the formula, of the function y = f(x) is given, are presented and our final conclusion is drawn.
The method of Descartes for calculating the slope of the tangent at a point of an algebraic curve. Descartes [24, 25] worked as follows for calculating the slope of the tangent at a point P (a, a2) of the parabola y = f(x) = x2: The equation of a secant line of the parabola through P is of the form
y - a2 = A(x - a), (2)
where A is its slope. Equation (2) can be also written as
x2 - a2 = A(x - a),
or as
(x + a)(x - a) - A(x - a) = 0,
or finally as
(x - a) (x + a - A) = 0.
The above secant line becomes a tangent of the parabola at P if, and only if, the multiplicity of the root x = a is greater than 1. This means that the value x = a need to be also a root of the equation
x + a - A = 0,
which gives that A = 2a. Consequently, in terms of the geometric representation of the derivative, which was developed later by Newton and Leibniz, one finds that for f(x) = x2 we have f '(a) = 2a .
It must be mentioned of course that in the era of Descartes the equation (2) of a straight line in terms of its slope was not known. This means that, in order to determine the equation of a secant line of the parabola through P, the consideration of another point of the parabola, apart from P, was needed, which makes the above procedure slightly more complicated. However, the brilliant idea of Descartes, who was a deep expert in Algebra, remains unchanged.
Generalizing the above process let as now consider a polynomial of any degree n with real coefficients of the form
y = f(x) = bnxn + bn-ixn-1 +......+ bix + bo.
For every real number a we have that f(x)-f(a)=bn(xn-an)+bn-i(xn~1-an~1)+...+bi(x-a)=bn(x-a)(xn~1+xn~2a +.... + an-1) + bn-i(x-a)(xn-2 + xn-3a +.... +an-2) +...+ bi(x-a), or
f(x) - f(a) = q(x) (x - a), (3)
where q(x) is also a polynomial with real coefficients and degree less than n.
Then, like in parabola, each secant line of the graph of the polynomial function y = f(x) through the point P
(a, f(a)) with slope equal to A, it has an equation of the form
f(x) - f(a) = A(x - a),
which using (3) could be written as
(x - a)[q(x) - A] = 0.
Therefore, applying again Descartes's argument for the parabola, one obtains that the slope of the tangent of y = f(x) at a is equal to A = q(a), which shows that f '(a) = q(a). Note that equation (3) holds even in case of a straight line
f(x) = b1x + b0
with b1 ^ 0 or b1 = 0 , where
f(x) - f(a) = b1 (x- a) and A = b1. In other words, another straight line intersects the line
y = b1x + b0
with multiplicity greater than 1, if, and only if, it coincides with it.
Now, let us consider a rational function of the form
w = ^.
g ( x )
where g(x) Kai f(x) are polynomials, with g(x) ^ 0. Then, by (3)
f(x) - f(a) = q(x) (x - a).
Therefore F(x) = f (x) (x - a) = Q(x)(x - a), where Q(x) = q(x) is a rational function. Therefore, we find
g (x) g (x)
again that
F(x) - F(a) = Q(x)(x - a).
Consequently equation (3) also holds in this case , with Q(x) a rational function having the same domain with F(x).
Further, let us consider the function f(x) = *Jx . Then, if a>0, one can write
f(x)- f(a) = VX -Va = 1 (x - a).
■\Jx + y a
Therefore, equation (3) holds again with
q(x) = 1
■v/x + Va
It is recalled here that a function is said to be an algebraic function, if it is a root, with respect to y, of an equation of the form
fn(x)yn + fn-1(x)yn-1 +......+f1(x)y + f0(x) = 0,
where n is a natural number and fn(x), fn-1(x),..., f1(x), fj(x) are polynomials, with respect to x, with real coefficients.
From the above definition it becomes evident that all the rational and irrational functions (i.e. those containing roots of rational functions of any order) are algebraic functions.
By suitably generalizing the above used arguments for rational functions, one can prove [26] that equation (3) remains true for all algebraic functions. Namely we have the following factorization lemma.
Lemma. For each a in the domain of an algebraic function y = f(x) there exists an algebraic function q(x) having the same domain with f(x), such that
f(x) - f(a) = q(x) (x - a).
As an immediate consequence of the above Lemma, one can give the following algebraic definition for the derivate of an algebraic function. Definition.
I) The derivative number at a point a in the domain of an algebraic function y = f(x) is defined by
f'(a) = q(a).
II) The derivative function y = f '(x) is defined in a suitable subset of the domain of f(x) by
f'(x) = q(x).
Example. The domain of f(x) = Jx and of q(x)= -1- is the interval [0, +), while the domain of
•Jx +y[a
f (x)= 1 is restricted to (0, + ). When a = 0, then q(x)= and equation (3) gives that -Jx = . Also, for x = 0,
2yfx yfx yfx
i -a
q (0) = _ and equation (3) is trivially written as -ya =—j=.
ja ^a
Remarks. 1) Since all algebraic functions are continuous functions, it becomes evident that the above algebraic definition of the derivative is equivalent to the classical definition (1). In fact the factorization described
by equation (3) actually raises the vagueness 0 appearing in the limit of definition (1).
0
However, if a transcendental function y = f(x) is not continuous at a, then the above limit either does not exist or it becomes infinite. Consequently, in such cases the derivative f'(a) does not exist, which means that the algebraic definition of the derivative cannot be applied in this case.
2) Note that all the known properties of the derivatives can be proved with the help of the above algebraic definition. As a first example, we shall prove here the product rule for derivatives. For this, let us consider the algebraic functions y = f(x) and y = g(x) with common domain A. Then, for each a in A, we can write
f(x) - f(a)= qi(x)(x - a)
and
g(x) - g(a)= q2(x)(x - a),
where qi(x) and q2(x) are also algebraic functions with domain A. Then
f '(a)= qi(a) and g'(a)= q2(a).
But fg(x) - fg(a)=f(x)g(x)-f(a)g(a)= f(x)g(x) - f(a)g(a)+ f(x)g(a) - f(x)g(a)= f(x)[g(x) - g(a)]+ [f(x) - f(a)]g(a)= =f(x) q2(x)(x-a)+g(a) qi(x)(x-a)=[f(x)q2(x)+g(a)qi(x)](x-a)=q(x)(x-a).
Therefore,
(fg)'(a) = q(a) = f(a)q2(a)+g(a)qi(a)=f(a)g' (a)+g(a)f'(a)= (fg'+gf')(a).
3) The proof of the chain rule is even easier. In fact, if F = f o g, with y = g(x), then applying equation (3) one finds that
F(x) - F(a) = q(x)(x - a) (4)
and g(x) - g(a) = q2(x)(x - a).
Also, for b=g(a), one finds with respect to y that
f(y) - f(b) = qi(y)(y - b).
But F(x) - F(a) = f(y) - f(b) = f(g(x)) - f(g(a)) = qi(g(x))[g(x) - g(a)] = qi(g(x))q2(x)(x - a). (5)
On comparing equations (4) and (5) one obtains that q(x) = qi(g(x))q2(x).
Therefore, q(a) = qi(g(a))q2(a) or q(a) = qi(b)q2(a).
Thus, applying the algebraic definition of the derivative one finally finds that
(f o g)'= f x' = fy' yx\
4) The common experience shows that, after proving the properties and finding the basic formulas for calculating the derivatives, students are very little interested for using the limits connected to them. In fact, their attention is then turned to the study of functions and to the design of their graphs with the help of derivatives, as well as to the other practical applications of the derivatives, which are also useful to the study of other scientific topics, like Physics, Economy, Engineering, etc. Therefore, one could be taught the derivatives on the basis of their algebraic definition first with the introduction of the difficult concept of the limits to be followed only when it becomes necessary, i.e. when it is time to calculate the derivatives of the transcendental functions [27].
Caratheodory's definition for the derivative. Let as consider a polynomial function y = f(x) in a real interval 5 of radius a. Since f(x) is a bounded function in 5, equation (3) gives that
\f(x) - f(a)\ < K|x-a|, (6)
for a suitable value of the constant K. Therefore, as the interval 5 decreases around a, the value of f(x) approximates the value f(a).
In this simple way one can introduce the concept of continuity of a function and can prove that all polynomials are continuous functions, without making a direct use of the limits. Note that inequality (6) holds for all algebraic functions [26], which means that one can prove through it the continuity of all such functions.
The famous Greek mathematician Caratheodory (1873-1950), who, among others, helped Einstein to develop the mathematical part of the Relativity Theory, introduced the following general definition for the derivative in terms of the concept of continuity [28], which extends the definition for the algebraic functions presented in Section II.
Definition. A function y = f(x) is said to be differentiate at a point x = a in its domain, if there exists a factorization of the form
f(x) - f(a) = q(x) (x - a),
where q(x) is a function continuous at a. Then the value q(a) is called the derivative (number) of y = f(x) at a and it is denoted by f '(a). Further, the function y = f '(x), defined in a suitable subset of the domain of f(x), is called the derivative (function) of f(x).
Since in the above definition q(x) is continuous at a , we have that
f '(a) = Hm_ f (X) — f (a) = Hm_ q(X(X — a) = q(a).
x — a x — a
Therefore, Caratheodory's definition is equivalent to the classical definition (1) of the derivative.
Although the above definition has been used successfully by a considerable number of German mathematicians of the era of Caratheodory and later on, it is not so widely known in the international and in
particular in the English literature, neither it is included in the school text books.
Of course, the above definition is not completely independent from the concept of the limit, which is strictly connected to the concept of continuity. Nevertheless, it has the advantage that at the first steps (algebraic functions) it does not require the use of the limits at all. Consequently, it could be reclaimed more for teaching purposes.
Approximate calculation of the derivative and design of its graph. The examples to be presented in this Section constitute part of a joint, but unpublished yet, work of the present author with V. Borji and S.H. Alamolhodaee from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, on the use of the APOS theory for the graphical representation of the derivative.
The geometric representation of the derivative of a function at a point of its domain leads to a method of calculating the derivative, if we don't know its formula, with the help of a Table of suitably chosen values of the given function. This method, which is applied in Example 1, is based on the fact that the secant line of the graph of a function y = f(x) at the points A and B approximates the tangent of the graph at A, when the point B is moving approaching to A either from the left, or from the right (see Figure 1, where B is approaching A from its right side).
Fig. 1. The point B approaches A from its right side
Example 1. Use the values of the continuous function y = f(x) given in the below Table to approximate the value of its derivative at x = 2.
Tablel. Values of y = f(x) in Example 1
x 1.9 1.99 1.999 2.0001 2.001 2.1
F(x) 3.61 3.9601 3.996001 4.00040001 4.004001 4.41
From Table 1 one observes that, as x tends to 2, f(x) tends to 4. Then the slopes of the corresponding secant lines of the function's graph approaching its tangent at (2,4) can be calculated. This is shown in Fig.2, concerning a correct student solution of this example.
Fig.2 A correct student solution of Example 1
In this way, it is finally found that that f '(2) = 4.
The method applied in Example 1, combined with the use of the proper software, can be also utilized for the approximate design of the graph of the function f '(x), given the graph, but not the formula, of f(x). For this, it suffices to calculate graphically the coordinates (x, f(x)) of n random points of the graph of f{x), where n is a sufficiently large natural number, then to calculate, as in Example 1, the corresponding values off'(x), to plot the points (x, f'(x)) in the existing coordinate system and finally to join all these points with a continuous line. The above process is illustrated in the following Example 2.
Example2. In the following figure the graph of a function f(x) (red line) is presented.in the interval [-3,3]. Design in the same interval and in the same coordinate system the graph of the derivative f'(x).
Fig. 3. Graph of f(x) in [-3, 3] and representation of the points of f'(x)
Solution. For symmetry reasons (and only for this) we choose the points with x-coordinates equal to a+ k(b ~ , k =0, 1,...., n, where in our case a = -3 and b = 3. If we take, for example n = 20, the corresponding
x-coordinates are -3, -3+
6
54, -3+12 =- 48.....-3+196=54, 3.
20 20 20 20 20 20 The 21 green points of the graph off'(x) shown in Fig.3 were plotted using the Maple software. Further, for n = 200 and with the help of Maple one obtains the graph of Fig. 4 (green line).
n
Fig.4. Graph of f'(x)
Note. Fig.3 represents the graph of the function f(x)=x3.
Our last Example 3 illustrates another approximate method for designing the graph of f'(x) given the graph off(x), which can be applied with the use of pencil only.
Example 3. The graph of a function y = f(x) is given in the below figure. Observing that its tangent at the point (a, f(a)) is horizontal and its tangent at (b, f(b)) is vertical with respect to the x-axis, sketch the graph of the derivative function f'(x).
Fig.5. Graph of y = f(x) in Example 3
Solution. Since the tangent of the given graph at (a, f(a)) is parallel to the x-axis, its slope is equal to zero, which means that f '(a) = 0. Consequently, the graph of f '(x) intersects the x-axis at a.
Also, from Figure 4 one observes that f(x) is strictly decreasing in the interval (-ot, a), which means that f'(x)<0, for all x in (-ot, a). Therefore, the graph off '(x) in (-ot, a) lies under the x-axis. Further, the concavity of
f(x) in (-ot, a), is upwards, which means that f"'(x)>0. Consequently, the derivative function f'(x) is strictly increasing in (-ot , a).
In the interval (a, b), f(x) is strictly increasing, therefore f'(x)>0. Thus the graph of f '(x) lies over the x-axis. Also the concavity off(x) is upwards, which means that f'(x) is strictly increasing
Since the tangent of the graph of f(x) at b is vertical its slope is equal to + ot, therefore there is no real value for the derivative of f(x) at b, i.e. b does not belong to the domain of f'(x).
Similarly, in the interval (b, c) we have that f '(x)>0 and f''(x)<0, i.e. f'(x) is decreasing and its graph lies over the x-axis.
At the point (c, f(c)) the left and right tangents to the graph of f(x) are different, which means that f '(x) is not defined at c.
Finally, in the interval (c, + ot) f(x) is strictly decreasing and its graph turns to a straight line. Therefore the value of the derivative f '(x) is equal to a negative real constant at all points of this interval, which means that its graph is a straight line parallel to the x-axis and lying under it.
All the above lead to the draft design of the graph off '(x) presented in Fig.6.
Fig.6. A correct student response for Example 3
From the discussion performed in this paper the following conluson can be drawn:
Conclusion. The graphical representation of the derivatives finds many interesting applications that could and must be reckaimed better for teaching purposes.
References
1. Andresen, M. (2007), Introduction of a new construct: The conceptual tool "Flexibility", The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 4, 230-250.
2. Arnon, I. Cottrill, J. Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Roa, S., Trigueros, M. & Weller, K. (2014), APOS Theory: A Framework for Research and Curriculum Development in Mathematics Education, Springer, NY, Heidelberg, Dondrecht, London.
3. Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D.J., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D. & Thomas, K. (1996), A framework for research
and development in undergraduate mathematics education. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 2, 1-32.
4. Asiala, M., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E. & Schwingendorf, K.E. (1997), The development of students' graphical understanding of the derivative, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, 399-431.
5. Baker, B., Cooley, L. & Trigueros, M. (2000), A Calculus Graphing Schema, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 557-576.
6. Borji, V. & Voskoglou, M.Gr., (2016) Applying the APOS Theory to Study the Student Understanding of the Polar
Coordinates, American Journal of Educational Research, 4(16), 1149-1156.
7. Borji, V. & Voskoglou, M.Gr., (2017), Designing an ACE Approach for Teaching the Polar Coordinates, American Journal of Educational Research, 306-309.
8. Caratheodory, C. (1950), Funktionentheorie, Birkhauser, Basel.
9. Clark J.M., Cordero, F., Cottrill, J., Czarnocha, B., DeVries, D.J., St. John, D., Tolias T.& Vidakovic, D. (1997), Constructing a schema: The case of the chain rule. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 1, 345-364.
10. Descartes, R., La Geometrie (1637), Leiden, English translation by D.E. Smith & M.L. Latham, Open Court Publ., Chicago, 1925, reprinted by Dover, New York, 1954.
11. Ferrini-Mundy, J. & Graham, K. (1994). Research in calculus learning: Understanding limits, derivatives, and integrals, in E. Dubinsky & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research issues in undergraduate mathematics learning, pp. 19-26, Mathematical Association of America.
12. Giraldo, V., Carvalho, L.M. & Tall, D.O. (2003), Descriptions and Definitions in the Teaching of Elementary Calculus, Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 445-452.
13. Hahkioniemi, M. (2004), Perceptual and symbolic representations as a starting point of the acquisition of the derivative, Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 73-80.
14. Maharaj, A. (2005), Investigating the Senior Certificate Mathematics examination in South Africa: Implications for teaching, Ph.D. thesis, Pretoria, University of South Africa
15. Maharaj, A. (2010), An APOS Analysis of Students' Understanding of the Concept of a Limit of a Function. Pythagoras, 71, 41-52.
16. Maharaj, A. (2013), An APOS Analysis of natural science students'understanding of the derivatives, South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1-19.
17. Orton, A. (1983), Students' Understanding of Differentiation, Educational Studies in Mathematics,14, :235-250.
18. Piaget, J. (1970), Genetic Epistemology, Columbia University Press, New York and London.
19. Range, R. M. (2011), Where are limits needed in Calculus? American Mathematical Monthly, 118(5), 404-417.
20. Range, R. M. (2014), Descartes's Double Point Method for Tangents: An Old Idea Suggests New Approaches to Calculus, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 61(4), 387-389.
21. Roorda, G., Vos, P. & Goedhart, M. (2009), Derivatives and applications; development of one student's understanding, Proceedings of CERME 6, Available at www.inrp.fr/editions/cerme6.
22. Tall, D. (1993), Students' Difficulties in Calculus, Plenary Address, Proceedings of ICME-7, 13-28, Québec, Canada.
23. Tall, D. (2010), A sensible approach to the calculus, Plenary talk, National and International Meeting on the Teaching of Calculus, Puebla, Mexico, available at http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/downloads.html.
24. Thompson, P.W. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 229-274.
25. Van Schooten, F. (1661), Geometria a Renato Des Cartes, Gallice Edita, Amsterdam.
26. Voskoglou, M.Gr. (2013), An Application of the APOS/ACE in Teaching the Irrational Numbers, Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 30-47.
27. Uygur, T. & Ozda?, A. (2005), Misconceptions and difficulties with the chain rule, The Mathematics Education into the 21st century Project, Malaysia: University of Technology, available at http://math.unipa.it/~grim/21_project/21_malasya_Uygur209-213_05.pdf.
28. Zandieh, M.J. (2000), A Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Student Understanding of the Concept of Derivative, CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 8, 103-122.
ПРО ГРАФ1ЧНЕ ПРЕДСТАВЛЕННЯ ПОХ1ДНИХ Воскоглой М. Гр.
Вищий навчально-технолог'чний iHcmumym Зах'дноУГреци, Патрас, Гре^я Анота^я. У cmammi дано альтернативне визначення поняття пох'дноУ, в якому не використовуеться поняття границ. Це визначення фунтуеться на '¡деУ Декарта для обчислення нахилу дотичноÏ до кривоÏ в точц i справедливе для вах алгебра/чних функ^й. Каратеодор'1 розширив це визначення до загального визначення похдноÏ в терм>нах неперервност'1. Проте, хоча це визначення yспiшно використовувалося багатьма шмецькими математиками, воно не було широко в'>домим у м'жнародн'ш лiтератyрi i не використовувалося у шюльних пдручниках. Також у сmаmmi описано методи обчислення поздно)' функцп y = f (x) в точц за допомогою побрано)' таблиц значень функцп' y = f (x) та методи побудови графiка поздно)' функцп y = f'(x) за графком функцп y = f (x), а не за ÏÏ формулою. Ц методи фунтуються на граф'нному представлены пох'дноУ, що можна активно використовувати у навчанн'1.
Ключовi слова: вивчення пох'дноУ, дотична до графiка функцп в точц, алгебраÏчнi i трансцендентн функцп, визначення пох'дноУза Каратеодор'1, графiк помдноУ функ^й, програма Maple.
