Научная статья на тему 'When all separately band preserving bilinear operators are symmetric?'

When all separately band preserving bilinear operators are symmetric? Текст научной статьи по специальности «Математика»

CC BY
74
8
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Область наук
Ключевые слова
\SIGMA-DISTRIBUTIVE BOOLEAN ALGEBRA / VECTOR LATTICE / BAND PRESERVING OPERATOR / ORTHOSYMMETRIC BILINEAR OPERATOR / BOOLEAN VALUED MODEL

Аннотация научной статьи по математике, автор научной работы — Kusraev Anatoly G.

A purely algebraic characterization of universally complete vector lattices in which all separately band preserving bilinear operators are symmetric is obtained: this class consists of universally complete vector lattices with \sigma-distributive Boolean algebra of bands.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «When all separately band preserving bilinear operators are symmetric?»

Владикавказский математический журнал апрель-июнь, 2007, Том 9, Выпуск 2

UDC 517.98

WHEN ALL SEPARATELY BAND PRESERVING BILINEAR OPERATORS ARE SYMMETRIC?

A. G. Kusraev

To Vladimir Kojbaev on occasion of his 50th birthday

A purely algebraic characterization of universally complete vector lattices in which all separately band

preserving bilinear operators are symmetric is obtained: this class consists of universally complete vector

lattices with a-distributive Boolean algebra of bands.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 46A40, 47A65, 03C90, 06F25.

Key words: vector lattice, band preserving operator, orthosymmetric bilinear operator, a-distributive

Boolean algebra, Boolean valued model.

The aim of this note is to give an algebraic characterization of those universally complete vector lattice in which all band preserving bilinear operators are symmetric. We start with recalling some definitions and auxiliary facts about bilinear operators on vector lattices. For the theory of vector lattices and positive operators we refer to the books [1] and [7].

Let E and F be vector lattices. A bilinear operator b : E x E ^ G is called orthosymmetric if x A y = 0 implies b(x, y) = 0 for arbitrary x,y G E, see [3]. Recall also that b is said to be symmetric (or antisymmetric) if b(x,y) = b(y,x) (respectively b(x,y) = -b(y,x)) for all x,y G E. Finally, b is said to be 'positive if b(x, y) ^ 0 for all 0 ^ x,y G E and orthoregular if it can be represented as the difference of two positive orthosymmetric bilinear operators [2]. The vector space of all orthoregular bilinear operators and its subspaces are always considered with the ordering determined by the cone of positive operators.

The following important property of orthosymmetric bilinear operators is due to G. Buskes and A. van Rooij (see [3, Corollary 2]):

Proposition 1. If E and F are arbitrary Archimedean vector lattices, then any positive orthosymmetric (and hence any orthoregular) bilinear operator from E x E to F is symmetric.

A bilinear operator b : E x E ^ E is said to be separately band 'preserving if the mappings b(-, e) and b(e, ■) are band preserving for all e G E or, equivalently, if b(L x E) C L and b(E x L) C L for any band L in E. For linear band preserving operators see [1, 5, 7].

Proposition 2. Let E be an Archimedean vector lattice and b is a bilinear operator in E (i. e. b acts from E x E into E). Then the following assertions are equivalent:

(1) b is separately band preserving;

(2) b(x, y) G {x}^ n [y}±± for all x,y G E;

(3) b(x, y) ± z for any z G E provided that x ± z or y ± z;

© 2007 Kusraev A. G.

1The author is supported by a grant from Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project № 06-01-00622.

If E has the principal projection property, then (1)—(3) are equivalent to (4) and (5):

(4) nb(x, y) = b(nx, ny) for any band projection n in E and all x,y £ E;

(5) nb(x, y) = b(nx, y) = b(x, ny) for any band projection n in E and all x,y £ E.

< We omit the routine arguments, cf. [1, Theorem 8.2]. >

It was proved in [4, Theorem 4] that for each Archimedean vector lattice E there exists a unique (up to lattice isomorphism) square, i.e. a pair (E0, 0), where E0 is an Archimedean vector lattice and 0 is a symmetric bimorphism from E x E to E0, with the following universal property: if b is a symmetric lattice bimorphism from E xE to some Archimedean vector lattice F, then there is a unique lattice homomorphism $5 : E0 ^ F with b = $60. The bimorphism 0 is an example of a separately band preserving bilinear operator, see [12, Theorem 6.4].

Proposition 3. Let E be a relatively uniformly complete vector lattice with the square E0. The correspondence S ^ S0 is an isomorphism of the vector lattice Orth(E0) onto the ordered vector space of all order bounded separately band preserving bilinear operators in E.

< Follows from [12, Theorems 6.2 (2) and 6.4] and [4, Theorem 9]. >

Evidently, a separately band preserving bilinear operator is orthosymmetric. Hence, all orthoregular separately band preserving operators are symmetric by Proposition 1. This brings up the question, which can be considered as a version of Wickstead's problem (see [7, 10, 11]):

Problem. Under what conditions all separately band preserving bilinear operators in a vector lattice are symmetric? order bounded?

A Boolean a-algebra B is called a-distributive if

\j f\ bn,m = /\ \/ bn,V(n) nSN mSN neN

for any double sequence (bn,m)n,mgN in B. Other equivalent definitions are collected in [15], see also [7]. Now, we are able to state the main result of the note, cf. [10, 11].

Theorem. Let G be a universally complete vector lattice and B := B(G) denotes the complete Boolean algebra of all bands in G. Then the following are equivalent:

(1) B is a-distributive;

(2) there is no nonzero separately band preserving antisymmetric bilinear operator in G;

(3) all separately band preserving bilinear operators in G are symmetric;

(4) all separately band preserving bilinear operators in G are order bounded.

Our proof of the stated theorem uses the Boolean valued approach which consists primarily in comparison of the instances of a mathematical object in two different Boolean valued models, most commonly the classical von Neumann universe V and the Boolean valued universe V(B). All necessary information from Boolean values analysis can be found in [13].

Fix a complete Boolean algebra B and consider the corresponding Boolean valued model of set theory V(B). Let R be the field of reals inside V(B). Then Rj (with the descended operations and order, see [13]), is a universally complete vector lattice. Recall that X ^ XA denotes the standard name mapping which embeds V into V(B). It is well known that if R is the field of reals in V, then RA can be considered as a dense subfield of R inside V(B).

Lemma 1. A Boolean algebra B is a-distributive if and only if V(B) |= R = RA.

< This fact was obtained by A. E. Gutman [5, 6], see also [7]. >

Let BLn (G) stands for the set of all separately band preserving bilinear operators in G := Rj. Clearly, BLn(G) becomes a faithful unitary module over the ring G if we define gT

2-24

Kusraev A. G.

as gT : x ^ g ■ Tx for all x G G. Denote by BLra (R) the element of V(B) representing the space of all internal RA-bilinear mappings from R x R to R. Then BLra (R) is a vector space over RA inside V(B), and BLra (R)| is an external (= in V) faithful unitary module over G.

Lemma 2. The modules BLn(G) and BLra (R) j are isomorphic by sending each separately band preserving bilinear operator b to its ascent b].

< We make use of the same arguments as in [8, Proposition 3.3]. Denote by [e] the order projection onto the band {e}^. Proposition 2 implies that every b G BLn(G) is extensional:

[b(x, y) — b(u, v)] ^ [x — u] V [y — v] (x, y, u, v G G).

Therefore, (since every extensional mapping has the ascent) there exists a unique internal function P := b] from R x R to R such that V(B) = P(x, y) = b(x, y) (x, y G G). With this in mind we deduce (© and 0 stand for internal operations in R):

P(x © y, z) = b(x + y, z) = b(x, z) + b(y, z) = p(x, z) © P(y, z) (x, y, z G G) P(AA 0 x, z) = b(A ■ x, z) = A ■ b(x, z) = AA 0 P(x, z) (x, z G G, A G R).

Thus, [ P : R ^ R is a RA-bilinear function ] = 1, i. e. [P G BLra (R)] = 1. Conversely, if P G BLra (R)|, then the descent P| : G x G ^ G is extensional, since the descent of any mapping is extensional, and bilinear, since P is RA-bilinear inside V(B). Moreover, we have

(V s,t G R) st = 0 ^ P(s,t) = 0.

Interpreting this in V(B) we obtain that b = P| is orthosymmetric. Now it remains to observe that an orthosymmetric extensional bilinear operator is separately order preserving. >

Lemma 3. Let P be a subfield of R and let E be a Hamel basis of the vector space R over the field P. The general form of a P-bilinear function P : R x R ^ R is given by

P (x,y) = y" xei ye2 0(e1, e2), x xe^ y = V] Уee,

where 0 : E x E ^ P is an arbitrary function with finite number of nonzero values.

< Follows easily from the definition of bilinear operator and the properties Hamel basis. >

< Proof of the Theorem. Suppose that an order unit 1 is fixed in G and G is endowed with the multiplication that makes G an f-algebra having 1 as its unit element.

(1) ^ (4): Let b : G x G ^ G be a band preserving bilinear operator and put c:= b(l, 1). We may assume that G is locally one-dimensional, since this property is equivalent to the assertion (1) as was shown by A. E. Gutman [5]. In that event for arbitrary x, y G G there exists a partition of unity (n^in P(G) and two families of reals (s^and (t^such that x = s^n^l and y = t^n^l for all £ G S. Proposition 2 implies that b(x, y) = s^t^c for all £ G S and hence b(x, y) = cxy. Now it evident that b is order bounded.

(4) ^ (3): A separately band preserving bilinear operator in G is order bounded by (4) and hence orthosymmetric; therefore, it is symmetric by Proposition 1.

(3) ^ (2): Any separately band preserving bilinear operator is symmetric by (3) and hence it is equal to zero, provided that it is also antisymmetric.

(2) ^ (1): Assume that B is not a-distributive. Then RA = R by Lemma 1 and a separately band preserving antisymmetric bilinear operator can be constructed on using Lemma 3. Indeed, a Hamel bases E of R over RA contains at least two different elements ei = e2. Define a function 0 : E x E ^ R so that 1 = 0(ei, e2) = — 0(e2, ei), and 0(ei, e2) = 0 for all

other pairs (e',e2) € E x E (in particular, 0 = 0(ei,ei) = 0(e2,e2). By Lemma 3 fio can be extended to an RA-bilinear function ¡3 : R x R ^ R. The descent b of ¡3 is a separately band preserving bilinear operator in G by Lemma 2. Moreover, b is nonzero and antisymmetric, since ¡3 is nonzero and antisymmetric by construction. This contradiction proves that RA = R and B is a-distributive. >

Corollary 1. There exists a nonatomic universally complete vector lattice in which all separately band preserving bilinear operators are order bounded and hence symmetric.

< It follows from the above Theorem and the following result by A. E. Gutman [5, 6]: there exists a nonatomic locally one-dimensional universally complete vector lattice. >

A bilinear operator b : GxG ^ G is called essentially nontrivial if nb = 0 implies n = 0 for any band projection n € P(G). The definition of a locally separable measure space see in [9].

Corollary 2. Let (fi, X, be a nonatomic locally separable measure space and let L^(fi, X,^) be the vector space of all equivalence classes of (almost everywhere equal) real measurable functions. Then there exists an essentially nontrivial separately band preserving antisymmetric bilinear operator in L^(fi, X,^).

< The proof goes in much the same way as in [9]. >

References

1. Aliprantis C. D., Burkinshaw O. Positive Operators.—New York: Acad. Press, 1985.

2. Buskes G., Kusraev A. G. Representation and extension of orthoregular bilinear operators // Vladikavkaz Math. J.—2007.—V. 9, № 1.—P. 16-29.

3. Buskes G., van Rooij, A. Almost /-algebras: commutativity and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality // Positivity.—2000.—V. 4.—P. 227-231.

4. Buskes G., van Rooij A. Squares of Riesz spaces // Rocky Mountain J. Math.—2001.—V. 31, № 1.— P. 45-56.

5. Gutman A. E. Locally one-dimensional K-spaces and a-distributive Boolean algebras // Siberian Adv. Math.—1995.—V. 5, № 2.—P. 99-121.

6. Gutman A. G. Disjointness preserving operators // Vector Lattices and Integral Operators (ed. S. S. Kutateladze).—Dordrecht etc.: Kluwer, 1996.—P. 361-454.

7. Kusraev A. G. Dominated Operators.—Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.

8. Kusraev A. G. On band preserving operators // Vladikavkaz Math. J.—2004.—V. 6, № 3.—P. 47-58.

9. Kusraev A. G. Automorphisms and derivations in the algebra of complex measurable functions // Vladikavkaz Math. J.—2005.—V. 7, № 3.—P. 45-49.

10. Kusraev A. G. Automorphisms and derivations in universally complete complex /-algebras // Siberian Math. J.—2006.—V. 47, № 1.—P. 97-107.

11. Kusraev A. G. Analysis, algebra, and logics in operator theory // Complex Analysis, Operator Theory, and Mathematical Modeling (Eds. Yu. F. Korobeinik, A. G. Kusraev).—Vladikavkaz: Vladikavkaz Scientific Center, 2006.—P. 171-204.

12. Kusraev A. G. Orthosymmetric Bilinear Operators.—Vladikavkaz: IAMI VSC RAS, 2007. (Preprint).

13. Kusraev A. G., Kutateladze S. S. Boolean valued analysis.—Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.

14. Kusraev A. G., Tabuev S. N. On disjointness preserving bilinear operators // Vladikavkaz Math. J.— 2004.—V. 6, № 1.—P. 58-70.

15. Sikorski R. Boolean Algebras.—Berlin etc.: Springer-Verlag, 1964.

16. Wickstead A. W. Representation and duality of multiplication operators on Archimedean Riesz spaces // Compositio Math.—1977.—V. 35, №. 3.—P. 225-238.

Received March 2007 AnATOLY Kusraev

Institute of Applied Mathematics and Informatics Vladikavkaz Science Center of the RAS Vladikavkaz, 362040, RUSSIA E-mail: [email protected]

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.