CC BY
41
ig Gene Material into Cells Neurobiology (Review)
anova, Master's degree Student, Laboratory Assistant, Laboratory of Genetic Engineering Technologies he Institute of Biology and Biomedicine; E.V. Borisova, PhD Student, Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Genetic Engineering Technologies of the Institute of Biology and Biomedicine;
V.A. Salina, PhD Student, Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Genetic Engineering Technologies of the Institute of Biology and Biomedicine;
A.A. Babaev, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology; Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Genetic Engineering Technologies of the Institute of Biology and Biomedicine
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, 23 Prospect Gagarina, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation
Viral vectors are modern tools for delivering genetic material into cells. Various types of viral vectors based on retroviruses, adeno-associated and lentiviral viruses, adenoviruses, herpes simplex and poxviruses are considered in this work. Adeno-associated vector systems are presented in more detail. Their main advantages (ability to integrate a target gene into the proper site of the host genome, preventing undesirable mutations; entering both dividing and nondividing cells; a wide transduction profile; low immune response; strong and stable transgene expression) have made these vectors a widely used and universal tool for transferring genes in vitro and in vivo. Possible applications of viral vectors in neurobiology are also shown.
Key words: viral vectors; adeno-associated viral vectors; helper plasmids; transfection; neurobiology.
At present, viral vectors are widely used for delivering genetic material into cells. It is owing to the specific life cycle of viruses that the first vectors (transgene carriers) began to be developed on their basis [1]. Viruses transfer foreign genes which are able to express in the infected cells [2]. Now, viruses have evolved to specialized molecular mechanisms capable of transferring effectively their genomes inside the cells which they infect [3].
A diversity of viral vectors is large, and each has its benefits and drawbacks. Presently, considerable efforts are directed to the development of viral vectors with improved safety characteristics and greater efficiency of delivering nucleic acid to the cells, and also to the provision of long-term and tissue-specific expression of the introduced genetic material. Potentially, viral vectors can be used as one of the ways of delivering genes in gene therapy of neoplasms and hereditary illnesses.
Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAV) are one of the most promising delivering vectors for gene therapy owing to their nonpathogenic properties, lack of immunogenicity on the part of a host, and tropism towards the majority of cells and tissues [4]. Adeno-associated viral vectors are very close to ideal vectors by their characteristics [5].
Viral vectors have also found their application in neurobiology as a system of effective delivery of genes to neurons and other neuronal cells in vitro and in vivo. Viral vectors make it possible to observe neurobiological functions, alter expression of the target genes, label the cells to determine their outcome, and to change physiological state of the specific cell populations. Application of viral vectors for delivering genes into the nervous system is very perspective for fundamental researches and therapeutic purposes as well.
For contacts: Ekaterina A. Epifanova, e-mail: epifa888@mail.ru
Types of viral vectors
There exist viral and nonviral systems of gene material delivery. Viral systems include vectors developed on the basis of retroviruses, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses (AAV), lentiviruses, and herpes simplex viruses (HSV). Nonviral systems comprise "naked" DNA and lipids or polyethylene glycol [4]. It does not matter which genome compose viral vectors, DNA or RNA, since they have similar life cycle which starts with the interaction with a specific receptor on the cell surface. After virion adsorption on the cell surface, the virus genome in the process of penetration is subject to "uncoating". Three molecular processes occur during the intracellular life cycle of the virus: replication of the genome nucleic acid, transcription and translation. At each stage the virus interferes with the cellular synthetic mechanisms and submits them to its own tasks, creating priorities for viral nucleic acids [6].
Neither DNA nor RNA can be used in the "naked" form for the delivery of genes to the target cells. A sugar phosphate backbone of nucleic acid molecules is located along their periphery by the polar groups towards the outside imparting them anionic properties [7]. At physiological pH values, nucleic acid carries a negative charge repelling it from the negatively charged outside surface of the cellular membrane. One more limitation to the penetration of nucleic acid into the cell is its hydrophilic property [8]. All its hydrophobic bases are turned inside the molecule, therefore it cannot penetrate through the hydrophobic barrier of the target cell [9]. In blood serum nucleic acid quickly degrades under the action of nucleases. Half life of unmodified interfering RNA in blood serum occupies 5-60 min, for DNA it lasts not more than 10 min [10]. Besides, nucleic acids are not able to identify specific target cells. Therefore, from the beginning of 1980s, vector genetic constructs are being developed to deliver genes into eukaryotic cells [11].
Retroviral vector systems
Retroviruses are referred to the group of viruses whose RNA-genome is converted to DNA in the infected cells. A retrovirus genome is formed by a positive strand RNA and includes three structural genes (gag, pol and env) flanked by long terminal repeats (LTR) [12]. LTR contain regular elements, which play a role in retrovirus penetration, are necessary for integrating DNA copy of virus genome with a host genome, and also determine the beginning and end of the virus genome. LTR controls expression of viral genes as well [13]. The envelope of retroviruses consists of a cytoplasmic membrane of the infected cell and viral proteins [14]. A specific feature of the retrovirus life cycle is reverse transcription of the virus in the infected cell using the viral RNA as a template with formation of a double-stranded DNA (provirus),
which then penetrates into the cell genome. This entry is arbitrary, and therefore the risk of insertional mutagenesis increases. As these viruses infect only dividing cells (to penetrate into the nucleus it is necessary to destroy the nuclear cell membrane, occurring during mitosis), retroviral vectors are mainly used for cell transfection ex vivo or for malignant tumor therapy [15]. The retroviral vectors are produced on the basis of provirus from which gag, pol and env genes are deleted to prevent virus reproduction and to place the desired genetic material instead. Up to 8 kb (thousand base pairs) of DNA-insert may be included into the retrovirus-based vector. For virus reproduction, the deleted viral genes (gag, pol, env), which encode viral proteins and provide virus reproduction, are incorporated into the genome of the packaging cell line on different chromosomes in such a way as to reduce the probability of reverse recombination of viral genes into the original viral genome and formation of replication-competent viruses [16].
Lentiviral vector systems
Lentiviruses are referred to the family of retroviruses and in contrast to other retroviruses infect not only dividing cells but nondividing either. The most studied lentivirus is human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Due to the ability of lentiviruses to include a large amount of genetic material (up to 8 kb) and infect dividing and nondividing cells, these viruses are perspective vectors for gene transfer in vivo [17]. HIV genome includes three structural protein genes (gag, pol, and env) and 6 regulatory protein genes (tat, rev, vpr, vpu, nef and vif) [18, 19]. Some genes may be excluded from the virus genome without reducing the virus ability to replicate and infect cells. The lentiviral life cycle is similar to that of other retroviruses excluding the ability to infect nondividing cell as well. This ability is provided by the interaction of viral preintegration complex with the nuclear membrane and transport though it [20]. The assembly of the lentiviral vector occurs in the packaging cells, which are continuous cells, synthesizing virus-specific proteins [21]. Packaging cells include packaging, vector and enveloping cassettes, which together allow the assembly of a functional viral particle [22, 23]. And their simultaneous expression does not cause formation of retroviral particles able to initiate infectious process in humans [24].
Lentiviruses have a relatively small size of a target gene insert (up to 8 kb), can provide a long-term expression of the transgene and induce a minimal immune response of a host organism [25]. Some authors do not consider these vectors to be suitable for the delivery in vivo, since they increase the risk of insertional mutagenesis. However, application of lentiviruses for the transduction of differentiated cells has a lower risk of insertional mutagenesis compared to the use of other retroviruses [26].
Adenovirus-based vector systems
Adenoviruses are a family of DNA viruses, carrying in their structure one double-stranded DNA molecule and lacking lipid membrane. Adenoviruses are divided on the basis of binding with specific sera into 51 serotypes [27], and into 6 subgroups more (from A to F) by the capacity to agglutinate erythrocytes in humans, rabbits and mice, and by oncogenicity for rodents [28]. Adenoviruses of various subgroups affect different human organs and tissues [29].
Engineering of recombinant adenoviral vectors is in many aspects similar to that of lentiviral vectors. Adenoviruses with defective replication were obtained by replacing E1 gene necessary for replication by the gene of interest, promoter and enhancer [30]. Such recombinant vectors effectively replicate in packaging cells expressing the product of E1 gene. Adenoviral vectors unable to replicate beyond the packaging cells are used to introduce transgenes in vivo [31]. Recombinant adenoviral vectors provide a very strong but short-term (5-10 days) expression of the cloned genes due to the immune response of the recipient organism [32]. To solve the problem, the second generation of adenoviral vectors was created, in which not only E1 gene but genes responsible for virus replication were also removed, remaining only elements determining genome beginning and end and viral packaging sequence [33]. Such vectors are capable of longer gene expression [14].
Adenoviruses can infect the majority of cell types (dividing and nondividing). The viral genome can accommodate 20 kb of the target gene insert, which is a sufficiently large capacity of the recombinant adenoviral vectors. Adenoviruses replicate in the nucleus of the infected cell as episomal elements and have a high transduction efficiency. Thus, for example, after direct intracranial injection of the recombinant adenovirus its capability to infect neurons, astrocytes, oligodendroglia, ependymocytes, choroidal epithelium and microglia has been revealed [34, 35].
Vector systems based on herpes simplex virus
Viral vectors based on HSV have a more simple construct than adenovirus-based vectors. The virus itself contains about 80 genes, one of which (IE3) is replaced most often during vector engineering [36]. Other genes may also be deleted, which allows for the increase of the vector size, or cloning several genes of interest. The disadvantages of the vectors based on HSV are a short-term expression of the cloned genes, toxicity for the target cells, low transduction efficiency and ability to infect only nondividing cells [37].
At present, amplicons — multiple repeating sequences of HSV including monomeric sequences organized as concatemers — are actively being used to create viral vectors [38]. Each monomer includes at least
one region of the viral DNA replication origins (oriS or oriL) and a sequence for DNA packaging into the viral particle (pac) [39]. Molecular cloning of these sequences into bacterial plasmid enables one to obtain a vector which packages DNA into HSV virion. Such vector systems are capable of including up to 150 kb of foreign DNA, which gives the opportunity to deliver several transcription units in one vector into the target cell without evoking immune response and cytopathic effect [40]. The life cycle of HSV is characterized by the two-stage process of infecting: an active stage (penetration and reproduction in the epithelial cells resulting in cell lysis) and a latent one (penetration and reproduction in the nervous cells) [41]. The cell lysis occurs due to the fact that during virus replication the formed virions leave the cell by nuclear membrane budding.
HSV, being neurotrophic and highly effective in studying retrograde and anterograde transport in CNS, can be introduced in a harmless latent state. HSV vectors have a large genetic size and can provide a long-term expression of the transgene, however, as mentioned above, their main drawback is toxicity for cells and low transduction efficiency [24].
Vector systems based on poxviruses
Poxviruses are large viruses, which contain double-stranded DNA. The poxviral vector allows the inclusion up to 25 kb of DNA nucleotides of interest without deleting the genes of the virus itself. Poxviruses-based vector systems are not so widely used, since eukaryotic promoters are not effectively recognized by the poxviral transcription mechanisms, and it is necessary to use poxviral promoters for effective expression of the recombinant genes in a recipient cell [42]. Poxviral transcripts are not subject to splicing and for this reason the DNA of interest must be represented in the form of complementary DNA. A characteristic feature of the poxvirus life cycle is the availability of its own DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which provides reading of more than a half of the viral genome during the initial and early stages of the reproductive cycle. Due to a large size and noninfectious nature of the poxviral DNA, foreign genes clone in poxviruses in vivo by recombination. Poxviruses possess natural tropism towards tumor tissues [43].
The main disadvantages of poxviruses are high immunogenicity, short-term expression and difficulties in replication in eukaryotic cells. The positive features of poxviruses are a high transduction efficiency, size and ability to infect the majority of cell types [44].
Adeno-associated viral systems and their benefits
Recombinant adeno-associated viruses are one of the most perspective delivery vectors for gene therapy and neurobiology owing to their nonpathogenic properties,
low immunogenicity on the part of a host, tropism towards the majority of the cells and tissues, high transduction efficiency and long duration of expression [45]. Their main drawback is a small vector size (up to 5 kb).
AAV are known to have 8 different serotypes. AAV2, AAV3 and AAV5 were initially isolated from monkeys [46]. AAB6 was supposed to be formed by recombination of AAV2 and AAV1, i.e. 5'-end of AAV2 fused with 3'-end of AAV1 (including two open reading frames) [47, 48]. AAV7 and AAV8 were isolated from rhesus monkey by PCR-amplification using primers obtained from the conservative regions of AAV1-AAV6 serotypes [49]. Among all eight serotypes, AAV2 is studied best and is widely used as a gene delivery vector [5].
AAV belongs to Parvoviridae family. This is a group of non-enveloped viruses containing a single-stranded DNA. The virus particle has an icosahedral (20 facets) symmetry 18-26 nm in diameter and 5.5-6.2 MDa molecular mass [50].
The most characteristic features of the nuclear structure are the groups of threefold peaks and loops located between two adjacent subunits [51]. Positively charged groups positioned along one side of each peak are responsible for binding with a cellular receptor — heparin sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) [52]. Due to a high expression of the given receptor in various tissues, binding to HSPG determines a wide spectrum of cellular specificity to AAV2 infection [53]. The loop located in the contiguous subunit also participates in binding to the HSPG cellular receptor and contains an epitope for neutralizing antibodies [5]. Neutralization of the immune response determines future successful viral vector reentry. X-ray analysis of the AAV2 particle structures opened the possibilities of altering the epitope, contained in the viral capsid proteins, and a neutralizing antibody, and performing other modifications applicable for readmission in gene therapy [54].
AAV2 has a single-stranded genome DNA consisting of 4,680 bases. Inverted terminal repeats containing 145 bases with a large content of GC pairs and capable of forming palindrome structure, are located both at the 5'-end and 3'-end [55]. AAV2-genome synthesizes with mRNA beginning from p19 promoter [56]. Gene cap encodes three viral proteins: VP1 (735 amino acids, 90 kDa), VP2 (598 amino acids, 72 kDa) and VP3 (533 amino acids, 60 kDa) forming a viral capsid in 1:1:20 ratio, respectively, the capsid having icosahedral symmetry and consisting of 60 subunits [57]. The three capsid proteins synthesize with one mRNA beginning with p40 promoter, and differ from each other because of alternative splicing and various start codons [58]. All three capsid proteins have the same carboxy-terminal sequences and stop-codons (Figure 1).
Inverted terminal repeats at both ends accomplish at least the three following functions. Firstly, 3'-end serves as a primer for the synthesis of a new DNA strand. Secondly, it has Rep-binding site for Rep78 and Rep68, which possess helicase, strand-specific and site-specific
ITS
AAV Genome
Pen _
ITR
PA —I
Vector Genome
'LR Pro mot er Transgano
ITR
c a
c c
G C
Q C C <J
t :
Inverted Terminal Repeat
c, n__
«¡CT :J>GIS№CCA3CaA5CGC<X:i.SJ yWOGMTSGCCM 3'
CCCA DTClCTCCCTcœKQcaCCTÇn ^tCCCTCACeGGTTGftGGTMTGATCCCCAAGtSis
C 1 1_____1
C'JCA; G C C- C G C G C G C C O C Q C Q
c- c a
TRS
Figure 1. The structure of wild-type genomes and the genome of recombinant vector AAV [59]: (a) a map of a wild-type genome AAV: 3 promoters, 4 Rep proteins and 3 Cap proteins (VP1-3); (b) typical recombinant vector AAV; (c) a detailed presentation of the secondary structure of inverted terminal repeats (ITR), Rep binding site (RBS) and terminal resolution site (TRS)
endonuclease activity [60]. Thirdly, there is a terminal resolution site there, which is identical to the sequence in chromosome 19 and serves as a sequence for integration with the virus genome [61].
The infection pathway of AAV2 includes several stages (Figure 2). Viral particles attach initially to the cell surface by binding with the receptor and coreceptor, which, in its turn, leads to internalization and inclusion into intracellular transport [62]. Then, these particles penetrate through the nuclear membrane or integrate their genomes with the genome of the host cell, or replicate their genome inside the nucleus [63]. HSPG is recognized to be the main cellular receptor for AAV2 binding [64].
The analysis of site-directed mutagenesis helped to
a
b
c
AAV particle
Binding to the receptor
-^
Gene expression
Figure 2. Life cycle of AAV2 [59]. Transduction of the target cell is initiated by binding AAV2 to the receptor on the target cell surface and coreceptor followed by internalization, entering the nucleus, DNA synthesis or integration into the genome and, eventually, gene expression
reveal the importance of the main amino acids in binding AAV2 capsid to heparin [65].
HSPG acts as the main receptor, but AAV2 also binds to coreceptor — fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) and avp5-integrin [66, 67]. FGFR1 is supposed to increase the strength of attaching the virus to the cell, while avp5-integrin is needed in endocytosis [68, 69]. After endocytosis, AAV2 viral particles get free from the endosome at low pH [70, 71]. Low pH is likely to induce conformational alterations of the viral proteins, which play a decisive role in the successful release from the endosome and entering the nucleus [72, 73].
In some nuclei AAV genome integrates into chromosome 19 as a provirus, and in others viral genomes can remain as episomes [5].
Helper plasmids. Transfection
Transfection is a process of introducing nucleic acid into human and animal cells by nonviral methods. Plasmid DNA is most commonly transferred into cells, but other macromolecules can also be translated inside the cell such as small interfering RNA, oligonucleotides, RNA, and proteins [74]. Transfection may comprise several stages, but formation of pores in the plasmatic membrane, through which extracellular material can penetrate inside the cell, is an obligatory stage [75, 76].
A standard method of obtaining rAAV includes transfection of rAAV cells by plasmid and packaging
plasmid encoding genes Rep and proteins VP [77]. Besides, cells can be coinfected by a helper virus, e.g. adenovirus, which provides accomplishment of various functions in the production of AAV [78, 79]. As a consequence, the cells produce not only AAV, but also adenoviruses that contaminate the end product (Figure 3 (a)).
The advanced method of rAAV obtaining is based on cotransfection of the cells by rAAV and helper plasmid derived from AAV and adenovirus [80-82]. In this case adenovirus is not produced (Figure 3 (b)) [80].
Helper plasmid possesses one or several functions, which are absent in a defective plasmid [84]. The transformed cells must be also infected by a supplementary virus, e.g. adenovirus, which benefits in many ways rAAV production [85-87].
Typical methods of producing rAAV vectors require cotransfection of cells by AAV2 plasmid vector and a supplementary plasmid (helper) [88].
Helper plasmid expresses genes rep and cap, and also genes encoding the products important for AAV2 production (Figure 4). A simple transfection of cells with helper plasmid and AAV2 vector is enough for successful obtaining of rAAV [83, 89].
Recombinant vectors derived from AAV2 are a perspective tool for gene therapy and neurobiology, as they are nonpathogenic and can express for a long time in different tissues [91-93].
The main properties of separation viral vectors such as dimensions of viral particles, the size of genome and insert capacity, immunogenicity, transduction efficiency and virus expression in the target cells are presented in the Table.
Application of genetic viral vectors in neurobiology
Transferring genetic information into the cells of the central nervous system has great perspectives for fundamental and clinical investigations in neurobiology [95, 96]. Since the brain represents a comprehensively organized structure, genetic manipulations in it are difficult [97]. At present, viral vectors are the vehicles most widely used for delivering genes into mature mammalian brain cells [98, 99]. Nevertheless, there does not exist an "ideal universal vector", and any brain investigations require the application of specific vector systems [100-102]. Besides, all vector systems have their own strong and weak points depending on the selected target cells and specificity of each study [103]. And the number of vectors suitable for fundamental studies exceeds the number of those which can be
IT R x IT R rep/cap Y| ITR X ITR Ad5 rep/cap Ad5
Vector plasmid AAV helper plasmid Ad helper virus Vector plasmid AAV/Ad helper plasmid
\i/ VV
o x^x
rAVV Ad
o
rAVV
b
a
Figure 3. Packaging of recombinant adeno-associated vector [83]: (a) standard protocol; rAAV particles are generated as a result of cell cotransfection, for example, by rAAV plasmid and packaging plasmid, encoding AAV2 protein Rep and VP proteins; the cells can also be transfected by a helper virus, such as adenovirus, which provides generation of AAV2 particles, and as a result the cells produce not only rAAV but adenovirus either; (b) a novel protocol; rAAV particles are generated by way of cotransfection of rAAV cells by vector plasmid and a new AAV/adenoviral (AAV/Ad) plasmid, the helper virus in this case is not produced. Here: X is a foreign gene incorporated into rAAV; ITR means inverted terminal repeats of AAV2; Ad5 are common regions for serotype 5 adenoviruses, contained in AAV/Ad helper plasmid
Figure 4. Helper plasmid (pDG) [90]: the plasmid carries all genes necessary for packaging AAV2 vectors into the capsid, i.e. genes rep and cap AAV2 and adenoviral genes VA, E2A and E4
Comparative characteristic of viral vectors
Parameters Retroviruses Lentiviruses Adenoviruses Herpes simplex virus Poxviruses Adeno-associated viruses
Particle dimension (nm) 100 100 80-120 120-300 200 20-30
Genome RNA RNA dsDNA dsDNA dsDNA ssDNA
Capacity, thousand base pairs (kb) 8 8 20 30-50 (for amplicons up to 150) 25 4.5-5.0
Titer, transducing units in ml-1 106-109 106-109 109-1013 108-1011 108-109 109-1013
Target cells Dividing Dividing Majority Non-dividing Majority Majority
Transduction efficiency Low High High Low High High
Immunogenicity Low Low High Low High Low
Integration with recipient DNA Probable Probable No No No Sometimes probable*
Expression duration Long Long Short Short Short Long
* In the cell, it is most frequently in an episomal form, sometimes integrates into genome as a provirus. In contrast to retroviruses, integration occurs strictly at a specific site. Based on [10, 13, 36, 44, 94]. dsDNA: double-stranded DNA; ssDNA: single-stranded DNA.
used in clinical trials [104, 105]. Now, adeno-associated, adenoviral, herpesviral and lentiviral vectors are most commonly used in neurobiology [106].
Recombinant adeno-associated viruses are vectors of several serotypes with a specific cell tropism. For example, AAV2 infect mainly neurons but not all kinds of neurons are equally well infected. Other serotypes such as AAV4 and AAV5 demonstrate different tropism and ability to diffusion [25].
Cre-recombinase in combination with Cre-dependent expression of protein and rAAV are employed for achieving transgene expression in various neuronal populations. Besides, Cre-dependent vectors showed reliable ability to retrograde infection and transgene expression [82].
Genetically encoded neuronal silencers are used to verify the participation of neuronal populations in behavioral functions [107]. For example, somatostatin-expressing cells (SST) in the Botzinger complex (ventrolateral medulla structure controlling breathing) were selectively deleted to check up their participation in respiration [108]. In this study, G proteins binding to the drosophila allastatin receptor (AlstR) were used, which can make mammal neurons silence during formation of the receptor-ligand complex by activating potassium conduction. The ligand and its receptor are unlikely to influence mammalian neurons separately. Application of rAAV2 allowed the achievement of AlstR specific expression in SST cell population.
The assessment of neuron electrical activity was widely examined to study neuronal functions and recently to characterize neuron networks. Neuron activity monitoring is a complicated task, which commonly reduces to a large-scale multi-neuron visualization of calcium level reflecting electrical activity [109]. Recombinant AAV can deliver genetically encoded calcium indicators to visualize calcium dynamics in natural conditions with a sufficient expression level for effective detection. Thus, rAAV-expression of calcium indicator camgaroo-2 was accomplished in the olfactory bulb of transgenic mice CaMKIIa-tTA under the control of tetracycline transactivator promoter element [110]. This induced expression in olfactory sensory axons and enabled the control of calcium dynamics in response to diverse aromatic substances.
The other calcium indicator, GCaMP3, was expressed in the cells of the mice motor cortex using rAAV2/rAAV5 that allowed the control of dynamic activity in the running mouse [111].
Adeno-associated viruses are also used to reveal and assess synaptic associations between the different types of neurons. For instance, such approach was used in order to distinguish projection model of the two mixed neuron populations which differ by the expression of dofamine receptor types 1 or 2 (D1R or D2R) [109]. Application of Cre-dependent viral vector and a strong promoter EF-1a made it possible to control GFP transgene in combination with the presence of genetic
modification in mice, which disclosed striking differences of strionigral and striopallidar substances [111].
HSV amplicons are utilized for expression of large genes and genes with the increased copy number. A mutant form of torsin A, for example, which is responsible for the development of torsion dystrophia and forms twisted inclusions in cytoplasmic membrane [112], can be expressed in the glioma cell culture with the help of the amplicon of the HSV [113].
In laboratory practice, lentiviral vectors with synapsin promoter contributing to the expression of the given gene in any type of neuronal cells are used [114-117]. Lentiviral vectors are also used with the promoter containing calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha with the expression in the exciting glutamatergic neurons [118, 119]. These vectors are used for optical and electrophysiological monitoring of their activity and for optogenetic stimulation as well, for example in acute drug-induced parkinsonism.
Adenoviral vectors are also applied in neurobiology, for example, in optogenetics. Thus, an optogenetic activator was created in prof. S. Kasparov's laboratory. It controls astrocyte activity through the expression of different variants of channelrhodopsin-2 to trigger extracellular events such as extracellular increase of Ca2+ concentration [120].
Conclusion
There are no ideal universal vectors, and different investigations require the application of specific vector systems. Besides, all vector systems are likely to have their own strong and weak points depending on the selected target cells and specificity of each study. In particular, the advantages of recombinant adeno-associated vectors (ability to integrate a target gene into the proper site of the host genome preventing undesirable mutations; incorporation both into dividing and nondividing cells; a wide transduction profile; low immune response; strong and stable transgene expression) distinguish them from other viral vectors and make them a popular and universal tool for gene delivery in vitro and in vivo.
Study Funding. The research was supported by the Federal Target Program "Research and development in priority areas of the development of the scientific and technological complex of Russia for 2014-2020" of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia, contract 14.581.21.0016 ("Development of methods, technologies and platforms for nervous systems research based on high-resolution informational model of the cortical brain structures", Project ID RFMEFI58115X0016).
Conflicts of Interest. The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this work.
References
1. Daya S., Berns K.I. Gene therapy using adeno-associated virus vectors. Clin Microbiol Rev 2008; 21(4): 583593, https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00008-08.
2. During M.J., Leone P. Adeno-associated virus vectors for gene therapy of neurodegenerative disorders. Clin Neurosci 1995; 3(5): 292-300.
3. Goff S.P., Berg P. Construction of hybrid viruses containing SV40 and lambda phage DNA segments and their propagation in cultured monkey cells. Cell 1976; 9(4): 695705, https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(76)90133-1.
4. Lu Y. Recombinant adeno-associated virus as delivery vector for gene therapy — a review. Stem Cells Dev 2004; 13(1): 133-145, https://doi.org/10.1089/154732804773099335.
5. Seow Y., Wood M.J. Biological gene delivery vehicles: beyond viral vector. Mol Ther2009; 17(5): 767-777, https://doi. org/10.1038/mt.2009.41.
6. Novikova N.A. Khranenie i realizatsiya geneticheskoy informatsii virusov. Uchebno-metodicheskiy material po programme povysheniya kvalifikatsii "Khranenie i obrabotka informatsii v biologicheskikh sistemakh" [Storage and realization of virus genetic information. Educational-methodical material for advanced training program "Storage and processing of information in biological systems"]. Nizhny Novgorod; 2007.
7. Nienhuis A.W. Development of gene therapy for blood disorders. Blood 2008; 111(9): 4431-4444, https://doi. org/10.1182/blood-2007-11-078121.
8. McClure C., Cole K.L.H., Wulff P., Klugmann M., Murray A.J. Production and titering of recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors. J Vis Exp 2011; 57: e3348, https://doi. org/10.3791/3348.
9. Davidson B.L., Stein C.S., Heth J.A., Martins I., Kotin R.M., Derksen T.A., Zabner J., Ghodsi A., Chiorini J.A. Recombinant adeno-associated virus type 2, 4, and 5 vectors: transduction of variant cell types and regions in the mammalian central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97(7): 3428-3432, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.977.3428.
10. Boeckle S., Wagner E. Optimizing targeted gene delivery: chemical modification of viral vectors and synthesis of artificial virus vector systems. AAPS J 2006; 8(4): E731-E742, https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj080483.
11. Giacca M., Zacchigna S. Virus-mediated gene delivery for human gene therapy. J Control Release 2012; 161: 377388, https://doi.org/10.1016/jJconrel.2012.04.008.
12. Daniel R., Smith J.A. Integration site selection by retroviral vectors: molecular mechanism and clinical consequences. Hum Gen Ther 2007; 19: 557-556, https://doi. org/10.1089/hum.2007.148.
13. Nemunaitis J., Edelman J. Selectively replicating viral vectors. Cancer Gene Therapy 2002; 9: 987-1000, https://doi. org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7700547.
14. Verma I.M., Naldini L., Kafri T., Miyoshi H., Takahashi M., Blomer U., Somia N., Wang L., Gage F.H. Gene therapy: promises, problems and prospects. Nature 1997; 389(6648): 239-242, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56947-0_13.
15. Lode H.N., Reisfeld R.A. Targeted cytokines for cancer immunotherapy. Immunol Res 2000; 21(2-3): 279-288, https:// doi.org/10.1385/ir:21:2-3:279.
16. Jolly D. Viral vector systems for gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther 1994; 1(1): 51-64.
17. Verhoeyen E., Cosset F.L. Surface-engineering of lentiviral vectors. J Gene Med 2004; 6(S1): 83-94, https://doi. org/10.1002/jgm.494.
18. Zhang X.Y., La Russa V.F., Reiser J. Transduction of bonemarrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by using lentivirus vectors pseudotyped with modified RD114 envelope
glycoproteins. J Virol 2004; 78(3): 1219-1229, https://doi. org/10.1128/jvi.78.3.1219-1229.2004.
19. Federici T., Kutner R., Zhang X.Y., Kuroda H., Tordo N., Boulis N.M., Reiser J. Comparative analysis of HIV-1-based lentiviral vectors bearing lyssavirus glycoproteins for neuronal gene transfer. Genet Vaccines Ther 2009; 7(1), https://doi. org/10.1186/1479-0556-7-1.
20. Tang Y.Q., Yuan J., Osapay G., Osapay K., Tran D., Miller C.J., Ouellette A.J., Selsted M.E. A cyclic antimicrobial peptide produced in primate leukocytes by the ligation of two truncated a-defensins. Science 1999; 286(5439): 498-502, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.498.
21. Frecha C., Szecsi J., Cosset F.L., Verhoeyen E. Strategies for targeting lentiviral vectors. Curr Gene Ther 2008; 8(6): 449-460, https://doi.org/10.2174/156652308786848003.
22. Cockrell A.S., Kafri T. Gene delivery by lentivirus vectors. Mol Biotechnol 2007; 36(3): 184-204, https://doi. org/10.1007/s12033-007-0010-8.
23. Pluta K., Kacprzak M.M. Use of HIV as a gene transfer vector. Acta Biochim Pol 2009; 56(4): 531-595.
24. Cronin J., Zhang X.Y., Reiser J. Altering the tropism of lentiviral vectors through pseudotyping. Curr Gene Ther 2005; 5(4): 387-398, https://doi.org/10.2174/1566523054546224.
25. Wanisch K., Yanez-Munoz R.J. Integration-deficient lentiviral vectors: a slow coming of age. Mol Ther 2009; 17(8): 1316-1332, https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2009.122.
26. Coura R. Viral vectors in neurobiology: therapeutic and research applications. In: Molecular Virology. Moses P. Adoga (editor). InTech; 2012; p. 75-89, https://doi.org/ 10.5772/32492.
27. Russell W.C. Adenoviruses: update on structure and function. J Gen Virol 2009; 90(1): 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1099/ vir.0.003087-0.
28. Roberts D.M., Nanda A., Havenga M.J., Abbink P., Lynch D.M., Ewald B.A., Liu J., Thorner A.R., Swanson P.E., Gorgone D.A., Lifton M.A., Lemckert A.A., Holterman L., Chen B., Dilraj A., Carville A., Mansfield K.G., Goudsmit J., Barouch D.H. Hexon-chimaeric adenovirus serotype 5 vectors circumvent pre-existing anti-vector immunity. Nature 2006; 441(7090): 239-243, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04721.
29. Segerman A., Arnberg N., Erikson A., Lindman K., Wadell G. There are two different species B adenovirus receptors: sBAR, common to species B1 and B2 adenoviruses, and sB2AR, exclusively used by species B2 adenoviruses. J Virol 2003; 77(2): 1157-1162, https://doi.org/10.1128/ jvi.77.2.1157-1162.2003.
30. Pichla-Gollon S.L., Lin S.W., Hensley S.E., Lasaro M.O., Herkenhoff-Haut L., Drinker M., Tatsis N., Gao G.P., Wilson J.M., Ertl H.C., Bergelson J.M. Effect of preexisting immunity on an adenovirus vaccine vector: in vitro neutralization assays fail to predict inhibition by antiviral antibody in vivo. J Virol 2009; 83(11): 5567-5573, https://doi. org/10.1128/jvi.00405-09.
31. Zaiss A.K., Machado H., Herschman H.R. The influence of innate and pre-existing immunity on adenovirus therapy. J Cell Biochem 2009; 108(4): 778-790, https://doi.org/10.1002/ jcb.22328.
32. Sakurai F. Development and evaluation of a novel gene delivery vehicle composed of adenovirus serotype 35. Biol Pharm Bull 2008; 31(10): 1819-1825, https://doi.org/10.1248/ bpb.31.1819.
33. Sharma A., Li X., Bangari D.S., Mittal S.K. Adenovirus receptors and their implications in gene delivery. Virus
Res 2009; 143(2): 184-194, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j. virusres.2009.02.010.
34. Akli S., Caillaud C., Vigne E., Stratford-Perricaudet L.D., Poenaru L., Perricaudet M., Kahn A., Peschanski M.R. Transfer of a foreign gene into the brain using adenovirus vectors. Nat Genet 1993; 3(3): 224-228, https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0393-224.
35. Davidson B.L., Allen E.D., Kozarsky K.F., Wilson J.M., Roessler B.J. A model system for in vivo gene transfer into the central nervous system using an adenoviral vector. Nat Genet 1993; 3(3): 219-223, https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0393-219.
36. Hukkanen V. Herpesvirus vectors in gene therapy. Open Virol J 2010; 4(3): 94-95, https://doi.org/10.2174/18743 57901004030094.
37. Bienkowska-Szewczyk K., Szewczyk B. Expression of genes coding for viral glycoproteins in heterologous systems. Acta Biochim Pol 1999; 46(2): 325-339.
38. Burton E.A., Fink D.J., Glorioso J.C. Gene delivery using herpes simplex virus vectors. DNA Cell Biol 2002; 21(12): 915-936, https://doi.org/10.1089/104454902762053864.
39. Fink D.J., Glorioso J.C. Herpes simplex viral vectors in gene therapy. In: Encyclopedia of life sciences. Wiley-Blackwell; 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902. a0005739.pub2.
40. Sena-Esteves M., Saeki Y., Fraefel C., Breakefield X.O. HSV-1 amplicon vectors — simplicity and versatility. Mol Ther 2000; 2(1): 9-15, https://doi.org/10.1006/mthe.2000.0096.
41. Laquerre S., Argnani R., Anderson D.B., Zucchini S., Manservigi R., Glorioso J.C. Heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding by herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoproteins B and C, which differ in their contributions to virus attachment, penetration, and cell-to-cell spread. J Virol 1998; 72(7): 61196130.
42. Sandvik T., Tryland M., Hansen H., Mehl R., Moens U., Olsvik O., Traavik T. Naturally occurring orthopoxviruses: potential for recombination with vaccine vectors. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36(9): 2542-2547.
43. Zeh H.J., Bartlett D.L. Development of a replication-selective, oncolytic poxvirus for the treatment of human cancers. Cancer Gene Ther 2002; 9(12): 1001-1012, https:// doi.org/10.1038/sj.cgt.7700549.
44. Davidson B.L., Breakefield X.O. Viral vectors for gene delivery to the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4(5): 353-364, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1104.
45. Somia N., Verma I.M. Gene therapy: trials and tribulations. Nat Rev Genet 2000; 1(2): 91-99, https://doi. org/10.1038/35038533.
46. Berns K.I. Parvoviridae. The viruses and their replication. In: Virology. Fields B.N., Knipe D.M., Howley P.M. (editors). 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia; 1996; p. 2173-2197.
47. Rutledge E.A., Halbert C.L., Russell D.W. Infectious clones and vectors derived from adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotypes other than AAV type 2. J Virol 1998; 72(1): 309-319.
48. Xiao W., Chirmule N., Berta S.C., McCullough B., Gao G., Wilson J.M. Gene therapy vectors based on adenoassociated virus type 1. J Virol 1999; 73(5): 3994-4003.
49. Gao G.P., Alvira M.R., Wang L., Calcedo R., Johnston J., Wilson J.M. Novel adeno-associated viruses from rhesus monkeys as vectors for human gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99(18): 11854-11859, https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.182412299.
50. Zhou X., Muzyczka N. In vitro packaging of adeno-associated virus DNA. J Virol 1998; 72: 3241-3247.
51. Zolotukhin S., Byrne B.J., Mason E., Zolotukhin I., Potter M., Chesnut K., Summerford C., Samulski R.J., Muzyczka N. Recombinant adeno-associated virus purification using novel methods improves infectious titer and yield. Gene Ther 1999; 6(6): 973-985, https://doi.org/10.1038/ sj.gt.3300938.
52. Clark K.R., Liu X., McGrath J.P., Johnson PR. Highly purified recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors are biologically active and free of detectable helper and wild-type viruses. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10(6): 1031-1039, https://doi. org/10.1089/10430349950018427.
53. Young S.M., Samulski R.J. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) site-specific recombination does not require a Rep-dependent origin of replication within the AAV terminal repeat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98(24): 13525-13530, https:// doi.org/10.1073/pnas.241508998.
54. Douar A.M., Poulard K., Stockholm D., Danos O. Intracellular trafficking of adeno-associated virus vectors: routing to the late endosomal compartment and proteasome degradation. J Virol 2001; 75(4): 1824-1833, https://doi. org/10.1128/jvi.75.4.1824-1833.2001.
55. Sun J.Y., Anand-Jawa V., Chatterjee S., Wong K.K. Immune responses to adeno-associated virus and its recombinant vectors. Gene Ther 2003; 10(11): 964-976, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3302039.
56. Grimm D. Production methods for gene transfer vectors based on adeno-associated virus serotypes. Methods 2002; 28(2): 146-157, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1046-2023(02) 00219-0.
57. Büning H., Ried M.U., Perabo L., Gerner F.M., Huttner N.A., Enssle J., Hallek M. Receptor targeting of adeno-associated virus vectors. Gene Ther 2003; 10(14): 1142-1151, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301976.
58. Balagüe C., Kalla M., Zhang W.W. Adeno-associated virus Rep78 protein and terminal repeats enhance integration of DNA sequences into the cellular genome. J Virol 1997; 71(4): 3299-3306.
59. Russell D.W., Kay M.A. Adeno-associated virus vectors and hemalology. Blood 1999; 94(3): 864-874.
60. Tsai T.H., Chen S.L., Xiao X., Liu D.W., Tsao Y.P. Gene therapy for treatment of cerebral ischemia using defective recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors. Methods 2002; 28(2): 253-258, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1046-2023(02)00230-x.
61. Young S.M., McCarty D.M., Degtyareva N., Samulski R.J. Roles of adeno-associated virus Rep protein and human chromosome 19 in site-specific recombination. J Virol 2000; 74(9): 3953-3966, https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.74.9.3953-3966.2000.
62. Hildinger M., Auricchio A., Gao G., Wang L., Chirmule N., Wilson J.M. Hybrid vectors based on adeno-associated virus serotypes 2 and 5 for muscle-directed gene transfer. J Virol 2001; 75(13): 6199-6203, https://doi. org/10.1128/jvi.75.13.6199-6203.2001.
63. Chao H., Liu Y., Rabinowitz J., Li C., Samulski R.J., Walsh C.E. Several log increase in therapeutic transgene delivery by distinct adeno-associated viral serotype vectors. Mol Ther 2000; 2(6): 619-623, https://doi.org/10.1006/ mthe.2000.0219.
64. Snyder R.O. Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery. J Gene Med 1999; 1(3): 166-175, https://
doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-2254(199905/06)1:3<166::aid-jgm34>3.0.co;2-z.
65. Wu P., Xiao W., Conlon T., Hughes J., Agbandje-McKenna M., Ferkol T., Flotte T., Muzyczka N. Mutational analysis of the adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) capsid gene and construction of AAV2 vectors with altered tropism. J Virol 2000; 74(18): 8635-8647, https://doi.org/10.1128/ jvi.74.18.8635-8647.2000.
66. Xie Q., Bu W., Bhatia S., Hare J., Somasundaram T., Azzi A., Chapman M.S. The atomic structure of adeno-associated virus (AAV-2), a vector for human gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99(16): 10405-10410, https:// doi.org/10.1073/pnas.162250899.
67. Xie Q., Somasundaram T., Bhatia S., Bu W., Chapman M.S. Structure determination of adeno-associated virus 2: three complete virus particles per asymmetric unit. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2003; 59(6): 959-970, https://doi.org/10.1107/s0907444903005675.
68. Doria M., Ferrara A., Auricchio A. AAV2/8 vectors purified from culture medium with a simple and rapid protocol transduce murine liver, muscle, and retina efficiently. Hum Gene Ther Method 2013; 24(6): 392-398, https://doi. org/10.1089/hgtb.2013.155.
69. Mietzsch M., Grasse S., Zurawski C., Weger S., Bennett A., Agbandje-McKenna M., Muzyczka N., Zolotukhin S., Heilbronn R. OneBac: platform for scalable and high-titer production of adeno-associated virus serotype 1-12 vectors for gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther 2014; 25(3): 212222, https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2013.184.
70. Grieger J.C., Samulski R.J. Adeno-associated virus vectorology, manufacturing, and clinical applications. Methods Enzymol 2012; 507: 229-254, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386509-0.00012-0.
71. Jooss K., Chirmule N. Immunity to adenovirus and adeno-associated viral vectors: implications for gene therapy. Gene Ther 2003; 10(11): 955-963, https://doi.org/10.1038/ sj.gt.3302037.
72. Nair H.P., Young L.J. Application of adeno-associated viral vectors in behavioral research. Methods 2002; 28(2): 195-202, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1046-2023(02)00223-2.
73. Ponnazhagan S., Mahendra G., Kumar S., Thompson J.A., Castillas M. Conjugate-based targeting of recombinant adeno-associated virus type 2 vectors by using avidin-linked ligands. J Virol 2002; 76(24): 12900-12907, https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.76.24.12900-12907.2002
74. Peel A.L., Zolotukhin S., Schrimsher G.W., Muzyczka N., Reier P.J. Efficient transduction of green fluorescent protein in spinal cord neurons using adeno-associated virus vectors containing cell type-specific promoters. Gene Ther 1997; 4(1): 16-24, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300358.
75. Groskreutz D., Schenborn E.T. Reporter systems. In: Recombinant protein protocols. Methods in molecular biology. Springer Nature; 1997; p. 11-30, https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-481-x:11.
76. El-Andaloussi N., Endele M., Leuchs B., Bonifati S., Kleinschmidt J., Rommelaere J., Marchini A. Novel adenovirus-based helper system to support production of recombinant parvovirus. Cancer Gene Ther 2010; 18(4): 240-249, https:// doi.org/10.1038/cgt.2010.73.
77. Rabinowitz J.E., Rolling F., Li C., Conrath H., Xiao W., Xiao X., Samulski R.J. Cross-packaging of a single adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 2 vector genome into multiple AAV serotypes enables transduction with broad specificity. J Virol
2002; 76(2): 791-801, https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.76.2791-801.2002.
78. Dubielzig R., King J.A., Weger S., Kern A., Kleinschmidt J.A. Adeno-associated virus type 2 protein interactions: formation of pre-encapsidation complexes. J Virol 1999; 73: 8989-8998.
79. Wistuba A., Kern A., Weger S., Grimm D., Kleinschmidt J.A. Subcellular compartmentalization of adeno-associated virus type 2 assembly. J Virol 1997; 71(2): 1341-1352.
80. Holehonnur R., Luong J.A., Chaturvedi D., Ho A., Lella S.K., Hosek M.P., Ploski J.E. Adeno-associated viral serotypes produce differing titers and differentially transduce neurons within the rat basal and lateral amygdala. BMC Neurosci 2014; 15(1): 28, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-15-28.
81. Nicolas A., Jolinon N., Alazard-Dany N., Barateau V., Epstein A.L., Greco A., Buning H., Salvetti A. Factors influencing helper-independent adeno-associated virus replication. Virology 2012; 432(1): 1-9, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.virol.2012.05.027.
82. Rothermel M., Brunert D., Zabawa C., Diaz-Quesada M., Wachowiak M. Transgene expression in target-defined neuron populations mediated by retrograde infection with adeno-associated viral vectors. J Neurosci 2013; 33(38): 15195-15206, https://doi.org/10.1523/ jneurosci.1618-13.2013.
83. Grimm D., Kern A., Ritter K., Kleinschmedt J.A. Novel tools for production and purification of recombinant adenoassociated virus vectors. Hum Gene Ther 1998; 9(18): 2745-2760, https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.1998.9.18-2745.
84. Kotin R.M. Large-scale recombinant adeno-associated virus production. Hum Mol Genet 2011; 20(R1): R2-R6, https:// doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr141.
85. Khan I.F., Hirata R.K., Russell D.W. AAV-mediated gene targeting methods for human cells. Nat Protoc 2011; 6(4): 482501, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.301.
86. Dong B., Moore A.R., Dai J., Roberts S., Chu K., Kapranov P., Moss B., Xiao W. A concept of eliminating nonhomologous recombination for scalable and safe AAV vector generation for human gene therapy. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41(13): 6609-6617, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt404.
87. Chiorini J.A., Afione S., Kotin R.M. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 5 Rep protein cleaves a unique terminal resolution site compared with other AAV serotypes. J Virol 1999; 73(5): 4293-4298.
88. Kay M.A., Manno C.S., Ragni M.V., Larson P.J., Couto L.B., McClelland A., Glader B., Chew A.J., Tai S.J., Herzog R.W., Arruda V., Johnson F., Scallan C., Skarsgard E., Flake A.W., High K.A. Evidence for gene transfer and expression of factor IX inhaemophilia B patients treated with an AAV vector. Nat Genet 2000; 24(3): 257-261, https://doi. org/10.1038/73464.
89. Grimm D. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotypes as vectors for human gene therapy. In: Research advances in virology. Vol. 1. Samal S.K., Liebler-Tenorio E., Delsert C., Paton D. (editors). India: Global Research Network; 2000; p. 91-114.
90. Grimm D., Kay M.A., Kleinschmidt J.A. Helper virusfree, optically controllable, and two-plasmid-based production of adeno-associated virus vectors of serotypes 1 to 6. Mol Ther 2003; 7(6): 839-850, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1525-0016(03)00095-9.
91. Synder R.O., Xiao X., Samulski R.J. Production of recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors. In: Current
protocols in human genetics. Dracopoli N. (editor). New York: John Wiley; 1996; Chpt. 12.1; p. 1-20.
92. Xu Z., Shi C., Qian Q. Scalable manufacturing methodologies for improving adeno-associated virus-based pharmaprojects. Chinese Science Bulletin 2014; 59(16): 18451855, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0197-6.
93. Wright J. Product-related impurities in clinical-grade recombinant AAV vectors: characterization and risk assessment. Biomedicines 2014; 2(1): 80-97, https://doi. org/10.3390/biomedicines2010080.
94. Lentz T.B., Gray S.J., Samulski R.J. Viral vectors for gene delivery to the central nervous system. Neurobiol Dis 2012; 48(2): 179-188, https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.nbd.2011.09.014.
95. Kamimura K., Suda T., Zhang G., Liu D. Advances in gene delivery systems. Pharmaceut Med 2011; 25(5): 293306, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03256872.
96. Auricchio A. Exchange of surface proteins impacts on viral vector cellular specificity and transduction characteristics: the retina as a model. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10(26): 30753081, https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.26.3075.
97. Snyder R.O., Im D.S., Muzyczka N. Evidence for covalent attachment of the adeno-associated virus (AAV) rep protein to the ends of the AAV genome. J Virol 1990; 64(12): 6204-6213.
98. Paterna J.-C., Bueler H. Recombinant adeno-associated virus vector design and gene expression in the mammalian brain. Methods 2002; 28(2): 208-218, https://doi. org/10.1016/s1046-2023(02)00225-6.
99. Kaspar B.K. Retrograde viral delivery of igf-1 prolongs survival in a mouse ALS model. Science 2003; 301(5634): 839-842, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1086137.
100. Chatterjee S., Li W., Wong C.A., Fisher-Adams G., Lu D., Guha M., Macer J.A., Forman S.J., Wong K.K. Jr. Transduction of primitive human marrow and cord blood-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells with adeno-associated virus vectors. Blood 1999; 93: 1882-1894.
101. Hermonat P.L., Muzyczka N. Use of adeno-associated virus as a mammalian DNA cloning vector: transduction of neomycin resistance into mammalian tissue culture cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81(20): 64666470, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.20.6466.
102. Polinski N.K., Gombash S.E., Manfredsson F.P., Lipton J.W., Kemp C.J., Cole-Strauss A., Kanaan N.M., Steece-Collier K., Kuhn N.C., Wohlgenant S.L., Sortwell C.E. Recombinant adenoassociated virus 2/5-mediated gene transfer is reduced in the aged rat midbrain. Neurobiol Aging 2015; 36(2): 1110-1120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neurobiolaging.2014.07.047.
103. Weger S., Wistuba A., Grimm D., Kleinschmidt J.A. Control of adeno-associated virus type 2 cap gene expression: relative influence of helper virus, terminal repeats, and Rep proteins. J Virol 1997; 71(11): 8437-8447.
104. Tiesjema B., Adan R.A.H., Luijendijk M.C.M., Kalsbeek A., la Fleur S.E. Differential effects of recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated neuropeptide Y overexpression in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and lateral hypothalamus on feeding behavior. J Neurosci 2007; 27(51): 14139-14146, https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3280-07.2007.
105. Nakai H., Storm T.A., Kay M.A. Recruitment of single-stranded recombinant adeno-associated virus vector genomes and intermolecular recombination are responsible for stable transduction of liver in vivo. J Virol 2000; 74(20): 9451-9463, https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.74.20.9451-9463.2000.
106. Kearns W.G., Afione S.A., Fulmer S.B., Pang M.C., Erikson D., Egan M., Landrum M.J., Flotte T.R., Cutting G.R. Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAVCFTR) vectors do not integrate in a site-specific fashion in an immortahzed epithelial cell line. Gene Ther 1996; 3(9): 748-775.
107. Betley J.N., Sternson S.M. Adeno-associated viral vectors for mapping, monitoring, and manipulating neural circuits. Hum Gene Ther 2011; 22(6): 669-677, https://doi. org/10.1089/hum.2010.204.
108. Tan W., Janczewski W.A., Yang P., Shao X.M., Callaway E.M., Feldman J.L. Silencing preBötzinger Complex somatostatin-expressing neurons induces persistent apnea in awake rat. Nat Neurosci 2008; 11(5): 538-540, https://doi. org/10.1038/nn.2104.
109. Tian L., Hires S.A., Mao T., Huber D., Chiappe M.E., Chalasani S.H., Petreanu L., Akerboom J., McKinney S.A., Schreiter E.R., Bargmann C.I., Jayaraman V., Svoboda K., Looger L.L. Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators. Nat Methods 2009; 6(12): 875-881, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1398.
110. Hasan M.T., Friedrich R.W., Euler T., Larkum M.E., Giese G., Both M., Duebel J., Waters J., Bujard H., Griesbeck O., Tsien R.Y., Nagai T., Miyawaki A., Denk W. Functional fluorescent Ca2+ indicator proteins in transgenic mice under TET control. PLoS Biol 2004; 2(6): e163, https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020163.
111. Kravitz A.V., Freeze B.S., Parker P.R., Kay K., Thwin M.T., Deisseroth K., Kreitzer A.C. Regulation of parkinsonian motor behaviours by optogenetic control of basal ganglia circuitry. Nature 2010; 466(7306): 622-626, https://doi. org/10.1038/nature09159.
112. Hewett J., Gonzalez-Agosti C., Slater D., Ziefer P., Li S., Bergeron D., Jacoby D.J., Ozelius L.J., Ramesh V., Breakefield X.O. Mutant torsinA, responsible for early-onset torsion dystonia, forms membrane inclusions in cultured neural cells. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9(9): 1403-1413, https://doi. org/10.1093/hmg/9.9.1403.
113. Bragg D.C., Wilbur J.D., Breakefield X.O. Expression of mutant and wild-type torsinA in human glioma cells by HSV amplicon vector-mediated gene transfer. In: Proc. 32nd Annual Meeting Society for Neuroscience. Orlando, Florida, USA; 2002.
114. Hioki H., Kameda H., Nakamura H., Okunomiya T., Ohira K., Nakamura K., Kuroda M., Furuta T., Kaneko T. Efficient gene transduction of neurons by lentivirus with enhanced neuron-specific promoters. Gene Ther 2007; 14(11): 872-882, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3302924.
115. Nathanson J.L., Yanagawa Y., Obata K., Callaway E.M. Preferential labeling of inhibitory and excitatory cortical neurons by endogenous tropism of adeno-associated virus and lentivirus vectors. Neuroscience 2009; 161(2): 441450, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.032.
116. Van Hooijdonk L.W., Ichwan M., Dijkmans T.F., Schouten T.G., de Backer M.W., Adan R.A., Verbeek F.J., Vreugdenhil E., Fitzsimons C.P. Lentivirus-mediated transgene delivery to the hippocampus reveals sub-field specific differences in expression. BMC Neurosci 2009; 10(1): 2, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-2.
117. Yaguchi M., Ohashi Y., Tsubota T., Sato A., Koyano K.W., Wang N., Miyashita Y. Characterization of the properties of seven promoters in the motor cortex of rats and monkeys after lentiviral vector-mediated gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther Methods 2013; 24(6): 333-344, https://doi. org/10.1089/hgtb.2012.238.
118. Dittgen T., Nimmerjahn A., Komai S., Licznerski P., Waters J., Margrie T.W., Helmchen F., Denk W., Brecht M., Osten P. Lentivirus-based genetic manipulations of cortical neurons and their optical and electrophysiological monitoring in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101(52): 18206-18211, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407976101.
119. Seeger-Armbruster S., Bosch-Bouju C., Little S.T.C., Smither R.A., Hughes S.M., Hyland B.I., Parr-Brownlie L.C.
Patterned, but not tonic, optogenetic stimulation in motor thalamus improves reaching in acute drug-induced parkinsonian rats. J Neurosci 2015; 35(3): 1211-1216, https:// doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3277-14.2015.
120. Figueiredo M., Lane S., Stout R.F., Liu B., Parpura V., Teschemacher A.G., Kasparov S. Comparative analysis of optogenetic actuators in cultured astrocytes. Cell Calcium 2014; 56(3): 208-214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2014.07.007.
